Trigger event on First Call

I use one event structure and would like to trigger (one or more) event case when I first run the VI.
How can I do that correctly?
Thanks

Here's another common idea. Use your timeout case in the event structure as an initialization case. Do this by setting the timeout to zero for the first loop iteration and -1 on every subsequent iteration.
Message Edited by Jarrod S. on 03-13-2007 05:14 PM
Jarrod S.
National Instruments
Attachments:
Init.PNG ‏4 KB

Similar Messages

How to send file as attachment and call RFC to trigger event in ECC?

Hello,
A file is retrieved from FTP into PI (w/ NO MAPPING required - just pass through) and placed on the ECC appl. Server. Then, a RFC is made to trigger an event to process the file in ECC. However, a RFC cannot be called in the graphical mapping if there is no mapping required.
I have seen this Blog, u201CFile to R/3 via ABAP Proxyu201D, http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1847. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] But we are told not to touch the file as it will be converted in ECC by a program.
Also, I read that using ABAP proxy-PI-FTP, I can do a pseudo mapping, simple one node, (just so a RFC can be triggered) and also pass the file as an attachment. Letu2019s say this works:
Question 1: What configuration steps in the FTP adapter that will allow me to u201Calsou201D send the file as an attachment?
Question 2: (Continue with ABAP proxy option) How do I control where will it be deposited so that the program can access it?
Question 3: If this is not the best approach, how many steps would I need to do it in BPM (i.e. pick up the file from FTP, place it on appl server, and trigger a RFC to call an event to process file)?
Thanks for any suggestions!
John_Xi

I have read those two help file and was able to use it in the ABAP proxy code. Thanks.
This is the current outcome. I totally understand that SAP PI communicates via XML. So when PI picks up a file that contains XML tags, the Inbound proxy is triggered. I can see its processing in SM50. However, when I give the Sender FTP adapter a non-XML file to pick up, the Inbound Proxy does not trigger. The file itself should be read into memory so that I can save it to the application server via ABAP code (with no mapping). That is why there is no operation mapping
The reason I am using using FTP to ABAP proxy is because I need to call a subsequent RFC step to process the file. Else, I will just use FTP to File Adapter scenario.
Question 1: I am thinking that that file is the attachment. Is that where I am incorrect and I still need to send in an XML file with the attachment as an addition?
Question 2: Is this the best approach or should I use BPM? If BPM, what steps do I need?

No "before new record saved" trigger event in workflow definition ?

Hello,
I have following problem: I have to make a simple integration, where products have information about available quantity of given product . Assume we have field - it is called "Available amount" and it tells how many products are on stock. Now suppose we have created an opportunity, and we want to add Opportunity Product Revenue - we're selecting product and then quantity. I want to make OCOD to display message and prevent from adding opportunity product revenue, when its quantity is greater than "Available amount" field which is present in associated product record. I've created small C# application and used workflows to create Integration events. It works - but not exaclty how I want it - when I add a new record the workflow generates integration event - but I'd like to generate integration event before a record is created, also I'd like to show a notification from OCOD. But for "revenue" we do not have a trigger event called for example : "before new record saved" - we have only "when new record saved" and "before modified record saved".

Hi,
From your requirement, it seems you, want some kind of check. Did you try puting this validation on field level, i guess you would need to join fields and compare in field validation. So, whenever user creates a new record this validation kicks and user is notified of the error.

First call attempt fails with 12000; reason="Routes available for this request but no available gateway at this point"

We've installed a new Audiocodes Mediant 1000B gateway for our customer. They only have about 6 users enabled for Enterprise voice and using Lync for all calls. They have an intermittent problem whereby the first call attempt to a number on the
PSTN fails with 12000; reason="Routes available for this request but no available gateway at this point". There is only one PSTN gateway installed. All routes point to this gateway. What I found initially is that the calls
were failing after 10 seconds which is the default "failovertimeout" in the OutboundRouting.exe.config. I found this post http://voipnorm.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/lync-2010-gateway-timeout-call-failures.html and
changed the value to 20 seconds. Subsequent failures failed after 20 seconds (the new value). The interesting thing is that the second attempt even a couple of seconds later succeeds. My Lync server event log has 46046 "A call to a PSTN
number failed due to non availability of gateways." for the failed call and 46047 "A PBX gateway is now responding to requests after some failures." for the successful call moments later.
My environment is Lync 2010. A single enterprise edition Front End with collocated mediation. The server is virtual and in a different physical location to the gateway. The two sites are connected via a LES1000. The RTT between the
sites is very low so it isn't necessarily networking.
In the Syslog output on the Audiocodes we don't see the call even reach the gateway. It's likely that Lync has simply marked the gateway as down and doesn't route the first call. Then it wakes up and marks it as up and routes the next call.
Update wise I'm on 4.0.7577.183, 199 and 217 for those that are up to date and the only components that are behind say that 223 is available. Those being Core Components, Lync Server, Conferencing Server and Web Components.
As I said, this is intermittent, apparently doesn't happen for every user (which I don't buy), but is easily replicated on request.
I definitely think changing the failovertimeout value has reduced the number of failures. But realistically I don't want users sitting there for 20 seconds before their call fails. Or 19 seconds for the call to route.
I've found a few posts on this and similar issues. I don't get the 25051 or 25052 errors.
Any help gratefully appreciated.
Regards
Randy Chapman
Best Regards Randy Chapman

Try to change the value of Failovertimeout to 1000.
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Event structure - "first run"

Dears all,
how can I manage the "first time" of an event structure?
See the VIs enclosed.
Thanks a lot at all.
Attachments:
Event structure - first time.llb ‏44 KB

You don't need to mess with dynamic events. Simply add a timeout event to the event case you want to trigger.
Feed the timeout terminal from a shift register initialized with zero and wired a -1 to the shift register on the right.
The event case will immediately trigger once due to timeout. After that, the timeout will be infinite.
(See attached image)
Also have a look at my old post. The need for a generic "initialize event" has been discussed long ago in more detail, but I can no longer find the thread.
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .
Attachments:
FirstRun.gif ‏11 KB

Bootsplash trigger events

on the bootsplash webpage it says to
trigger events during bootup
we suggest that you add a function to your init scripts that is called every time an init script is started. This can either be done in the runlevel scripts themselves or by the script/program scheduling it (i.e. /etc/init.d/rc)
function rc_splash()
test "$SPLASH" != "no" && test "$_rc_splash" -eq 1 && /sbin/splash "$1"
progress=$(( $progress + 1 ))
when adding the rc_splash call to your runlevel script scheduler, do it
about like this:
for i in $runrc/S${rex}*; do
# send information to bootsplash handler.
rc_splash "$i start"
done
but where is the archs program scheduling file., as i dont seem to see a /etc/init.d/rc, im tying to get the Default Linux theme at bootsplashes webpage to work.. i got everything to work except silent mode to display the silent Jpeg and gradient bar
thanks
-bolero

I have now gotten the progress bar to work. After trying a couple different approaches, this is my best shot. In /etc/rc.d/functions I extended stat_busy(), stat_done() and stat_fail() to look like this:
stat_busy() {
echo -ne "$C_OTHER$PREFIX_REG $C_MAIN$1$C_CLEAR "
deltext
echo -ne " $C_OTHER[${C_BUSY}BUSY$C_OTHER]$C_CLEAR "
[ "$BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS" -a "$BOOTSPLASH_DELTA" ] &&
BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS=$(($BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS+$BOOTSPLASH_DELTA))
stat_done() {
deltext
echo -e " $C_OTHER[${C_DONE}DONE$C_OTHER]$C_CLEAR "
[ "$BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS" -a -w /proc/splash ] &&
echo "show $BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS" > /proc/splash
stat_fail() {
deltext
echo -e " $C_OTHER[${C_FAIL}FAIL$C_OTHER]$C_CLEAR "
[ "$BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS" -a -w /proc/splash ] &&
echo "show $BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS" > /proc/splash
The idea is that $BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS holds the current value of the progress bar (which is in the range 0 - 65535) and $BOOTSPLASH_DELTA is the amount to increase the progress counter with on each stat_busy. These values are initialized in rc.sysinit like this:
[ "$BOOTSPLASH_SYSINIT" ] ||
BOOTSPLASH_SYSINIT=`grep -c -e stat_busy -e status /etc/rc.sysinit`
[ "$BOOTSPLASH_LOCAL" ] ||
BOOTSPLASH_LOCAL=`grep -c -e stat_busy -e status /etc/rc.local`
BOOTSPLASH_DAEMONS=`echo ${DAEMONS[@]} | sed 's/![^ ]*//g' | wc -w`
BOOTSPLASH_ALL=$(($BOOTSPLASH_SYSINIT+$BOOTSPLASH_LOCAL+$BOOTSPLASH_DAEMONS))
BOOTSPLASH_DELTA=$((65535/$BOOTSPLASH_ALL))
BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS=$((65535-$BOOTSPLASH_ALL*$BOOTSPLASH_DELTA))
I put this right before the point where local file systems are mounted, because the progress bar can't be updated before /proc is accessible. Another option is to initialize these variables in the beginning of rc.sysinit to make earlier stat_busy calls get counted, but the updates won't be visible before /proc is mounted anyway.
Because there is no way to export these variables from rc.sysinit to init's environment, rc.multi has to calculate them from scratch. Also the loop that starts daemons has to increase the counter because the daemon scripts can't export the new values. My full rc.multi script looks like this:
. /etc/rc.conf
. /etc/rc.d/functions
[ "$BOOTSPLASH_SYSINIT" ] ||
BOOTSPLASH_SYSINIT=`grep -c -e stat_busy -e status /etc/rc.sysinit`
[ "$BOOTSPLASH_LOCAL" ] ||
BOOTSPLASH_LOCAL=`grep -c -e stat_busy -e status /etc/rc.local`
BOOTSPLASH_DAEMONS=`echo ${DAEMONS[@]} | sed 's/![^ ]*//g' | wc -w`
BOOTSPLASH_DELTA=$((65535/($BOOTSPLASH_SYSINIT+$BOOTSPLASH_LOCAL+$BOOTSPLASH_DAEMONS)))
BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS=$((65535-($BOOTSPLASH_LOCAL+$BOOTSPLASH_DAEMONS)*$BOOTSPLASH_DELTA))
export BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS BOOTSPLASH_DELTA
# Start daemons
for daemon in "${DAEMONS[@]}"; do
if [[ `echo $daemon | grep '^[^!]' | wc -l` -eq 1 ]]; then
/etc/rc.d/$daemon start
BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS=$(($BOOTSPLASH_PROGRESS+$BOOTSPLASH_DELTA))
fi
done
if [ -x /etc/rc.local ]; then
/etc/rc.local
fi
Like I mentioned in my previous post, it's hard to know how many steps the bar is going to need. Especially rc.sysinit is full of conditional stat_busy statements. Therefor I made it possible to specify $BOOTSPLASH_SYSINIT (number of steps in rc.sysinit) in rc.conf. With the current rc.sysinit script this value is calculated as 19, but on my system rc.sysinit only executes 8 of the steps after the point where /proc is mounted.
The code presented here doesn't display text for the different stat_busy calls. I kind of had that working as well, but the texts were written on top of each other (old text wasn't erased) and you had to source the bootsplash-theme to get the text's font and position - it wasn't pretty.
I hope somebody finds this useful, and I might make a bootsplash package that includes the splash utils, an Arch theme and patches for the init scripts.
-bogomipz

No navigation but to the first called target

I have added links to the business partner factsheet with contact person as target. The first call runs smoothly but afterwards this contact partner will be the only one to be navigated to.
Here is the crucial part of the coding:
lr_nav_descr = cl_crm_ui_descriptor_obj_srv=>create_entity_based(
        ir_entity           = lr_entity
        iv_ui_object_action = if_crm_ui_descriptor_object=>gc_action_display
        iv_component        = 'BP_CONT_MAIN' ).
lr_navigation = cl_crm_ui_navigation_service=>get_instance( me ).
if lr_navigation->is_dynamic_nav_supported(
    ir_descriptor_object = lr_nav_descr ) = abap_true.
lr_col->insert(
    iv_bo    = lr_nav_descr
    iv_index = 1 ).
raise event history_trigger.
lr_navigation->navigate_dynamically( lr_col ).
endif.
Let me clarify the situation:
factsheet(Person A) -> Person A // Win!
factsheet(Person B) -> Person B // Fail!
lr_entity contains the correct data for navigation. I suppose that there is something like a navigational cache that has to be cleared. Anyone knows something about this?
Kind regards
Roman
Edited by: romanglass on Oct 28, 2010 11:20 AM Clarification

Hi Arun,
this seems to describe exactly my situation and while debugging it seems to attack the right problem. Only thing is that the correction is officially already applied. Coding tells me otherwise ...
Thank you for your help!
Kind regards
Roman
@sumit This is not the solution, I have already tried. But this was my first guess, too.

Restriction to trigger event

Hi all,
I need to implement a workflow to document management. When the employee complete a document, like a contract or some what, it set the status of document to 'Z1' and then trigger the workflow to several managers to approve the document. During the steps of approval, the managers may change the status too, in this situation, I don't want the workflow to be triggered again. So can I restrict the trigger event by some conditions? Only the 'DOCUMENT_CHANGED' event triggered and document status is 'Z1', trigger the workflow, other status, not trigger.
Of course, I can add an condition step to be the first step of workflow to filt the ones whose status is other than 'Z1'. But this will lead to so many waste workflows.

Hi,
Go to transaction SWETYPV, then find your event and workflow. double click on that. You will see the field to put in check function module. You can create a function module with a code to filter only status Z1.
Cheers,
Chaiphon

IPhone 4s call waiting; how do I get back to the first call?

When I'm on a call and a second call comes in I tap "hold current call and answer." I get connected to the second call and the first call is put on hold. But when I am done with the second call, how do I get back to the first call? I can't find any way to get back to the call that is on hold. I usually end up hanging up on both calls. Not good.
Also, how do I switch back and forth between two calls? How do I put the second call on hold, go back to the first call to tell that person I must call them back, then return to the second call?

http://support.apple.com/kb/TA38607?viewlocale=en_US
Good Luck

CoCreateInstance returns 0x8007007e (Module could not be found) for the first call only at system startup on Windows 2008 Enterprise SP2

Hi Guys,
I'm experiencing a problem with CoCreateInstance, where it returns error 0x8007007e.
The code is something like this:
HRESULT hRes = S_OK;
CComPtr<IMyInterface> spObj;
if(FAILED(CoInitialize(NULL))) { /* quit */ }while(FAILED(hRes = spObj.CoCreateInstance(CLDIS_MyClass, NULL, CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER)))
// LogFailure(hRes);
Sleep(10);
The problems occurs only on a single machine having Windows 2008 Enterprise SP2 installed (it works fine on other machines / OS versions). It happens only during the system startup (this is a Windows Service) and only for the first call of the CoCreateInstance.
The second call always succeeds.
The problem does not occurr when starting the service manually from Services.
I did some investigation using Process Monitor and found that the HKCR\CLSID\[CLSID of MyClass]\LocalServer32!LocalServer32 registry value is accessed before the failure. The registry value exists - it is added by the Windows Installer during
installation.
If I remove the registry value then the CoCreateInstance always succeeds.
I've been trying to lookup for some documentation on HKCR\CLSID\...\LocalServer32!LocalServer32 but haven't found anything useful other than it's a "Windows Installer Entrypoint". I assume that the Windows Installer does some integrity checks when
calling CoCreateInstance for such class and this fails for some reason but currently I fail to find the reason.
Can anyone help finding out what's the root cause of the 0x8007007e error here, please? Any help or tip is much appreciated.
Many thanks!
Marcin.

Hi Marcin,
This forum is mainly for talk about the product use related issue and not the best place to talk about the develop issue, for the develop issue we can post in MSDN forum for
the further help and your issue may need capture a dump then for the further analysis it is not an efficient way to work in this community since we may need more resources which is not appropriate to handle in the community. I‘d like to suggest that you submit
a service request to MS Professional tech support service so that a dedicated Support Professional can further assist with this request.
MSDN forum
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home
Please visit the below link to see the various paid support options that are available to better meet your needs.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?id=fh;en-us;offerprophone
Thanks for your understanding and support.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

How to quickly pick up a 2nd call and drop the first call

If I am on a phone call, and then a second call comes in, then how can I quickly pick up the second call and DROP the first call? I can do it if I put the first call on hold but then I have two calls going. If I simply END the first call, then it takes 5 or 6 seconds for the second call to come in. Several times I have lost the second call because it took too long to transition over.

never mind i did a direct chat with a skype rep and got my answer which is no.

Verizon's iPhone 4S is dropping the first call almost all the time?

Hi.
I have a verizon iPhone 4S.
Everytime I make the first call to someone, I don't hear anything.
When I end that call and try calling again, it works.
This has been happening almost all the time.
I tried letting the phone app turned on but it doesn't solve the problem.
I'm not sure if other carrier's iPhones are having this problem.
Does anyone know what the problem is to this?
Thank you very much.

I tried letting the phone app turned on but it doesn't solve the problem.
What does that mean?
Try a reset by pressing the home and sleep buttons until you see the Apple logo, ignoring the slider. Takes about 5-15 secs of button holding and you won't lose any data or settings.
If still a problem, restore.
If still a problem, take it in to Apple for a warranty replacement.
IMO, you'll probably end up taking it in to Apple but the other steps are worth trying.

Skype Windows client hangs for the first call - co...

Hi,
Skype on my Windows 8.1 (depending on its mood) hangs for the first call. It will keep ringing and ringing till it times out, during that time I am not able to hang up the call as well, the red hang up button doesnt work and we have to let the call go on till it drops on its own. Then on the second try it connects perfectly fine. This happens most of the times, there are only a few days where it connects on the first try otherwise its always the 2nd time.
Please let me know what could be the possible solution for this one?
Thanks

Hi Marcin,
This forum is mainly for talk about the product use related issue and not the best place to talk about the develop issue, for the develop issue we can post in MSDN forum for
the further help and your issue may need capture a dump then for the further analysis it is not an efficient way to work in this community since we may need more resources which is not appropriate to handle in the community. I‘d like to suggest that you submit
a service request to MS Professional tech support service so that a dedicated Support Professional can further assist with this request.
MSDN forum
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home
Please visit the below link to see the various paid support options that are available to better meet your needs.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?id=fh;en-us;offerprophone
Thanks for your understanding and support.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Cannot pick up calls on wait, Cannot make a second call holding the first call

I have a really weird problem with my iPhone 5S. (iOS 7.1)
1. When I am on a call, I am not able to pick up a second call that is on wait. I can see the second call, I can hear the beep sounds but as soon as I pick up, the call freezes in 00.00 time, and My first caller is still active, not on hold.
2. When I am on a call, I am not able to make a second call placing the first call on hold. The second call disconnects immediately with 3 beeps.
3. I am able to see the incoming calls on wait, when I am already on a call. I am able to hear the beeps coming in. SO it means the call waiting is on (Tried turning it on/off/on too.) But when I pick up the call, the above problem comes in.
What have I tried to solve this: (None of them helped)
1. I tried a hard reset of my iPhone (Holding Power and Home button)
2. I tried toggling the Call waiting button
3. I tried resetting network settings.
4. I called my Operator for assistance. I am using Airtel, India. They told me to dial this code - *43# . I tried it and it gave me this screen. But the problem is not solved yet.
Is there anybody here who is facing the same issue with your iPhone? I never had this problem with my iPhone 4.

Make sure you do not have "Do Not Disturb" turned on. This feature will block the first call, but is someone calls right back it will be put through.
On the iPhone, go to Settings/Do Not Disturb
Make sure you do not have Do Not Disturb turned on manual or scheduled.

CME - Second Call Drop the first call

Greetings,
Anyone ever seen something like this?
I get a call on my extension, and when I receive a call on another phone, the first call (in my Phone) drops.

I'm seeing this also with IPC softphone version 8.6.
Has anyone resolved this issue?

Trigger event on First Call

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for