Tuning Parameter : BALANCING

Hi,
We have been using the below 2 paramters to increase the Parallel Processing of Queues.
TUNING    EO_INBOUND_PARALLEL
TUNING    EO_OUTBOUND_PARALLEL
Now we are interested to Evenly distribute the Messages in the increased no of Queues with the below 2 Parameters.
TUNING  B_EO_IN_PARALLEL
TUNING  B_EO_OUT_PARALLEL
Parameter  BALANCING
The parameter BALANCING activates the entries for the parameters B_EO_IN_PARALLEL_SENDER, B_EO_OUT_PARALLEL, and B_EO_IN_PARALLEL. If the queues are redistributed,  it is automatically deactivated so that the messages can be processed 'normally' again.  To prevent locking conflicts, therefore, exit the editing mode for configuration maintenance once you have set the parameter.
Possible Values
0 (deactivated), 1 (activated)
we have to created BALANCING Parameter with value "1". It immeditely turns into "0". It never turns back to "1" although Queues are not balanced.
Is BALANCING automatic process of Balancing (or) We have to Manually turn on Balancing to "1" whenever we see a particualr Queue Overloaded.
Thanks,
Tanuj
Edited by: Tanuj Kumar Bolisetty on Jan 2, 2008 4:12 PM

Hi,
In EO_INBOUND_TO_OUTBOUND, you can specify the TUNING category so that a message is not placed in the outbound queue as usual; instead the message is processed and sent entirely in the inbound queue.
Refer the configuration parameter for it
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/28/68073c8e56f658e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
How to check message got processed in the inbound queue,,?
You can refer SMQ1 SMQ2 and ragister in SMQR
I think you could monitor it in SXMB_MONI provided you have set the Trace level properly i.e. 1 in SXMB_ADM --> Integration Engine ---> Specific configuration --> Trace and Log have to set current value as 1.
Set EO_INBOUND_TO_OUTBOUND=1 if
- outbound calls take too long (as this blocks processing queues)
- receiver is not fast enough (also prevents receiver overload)
- expensive CBR (content based routing) is used (reason: if an error occurs the whole pipeline must be re-processed)
Set EO_INBOUND_TO_OUTBOUND=0 if
- only IDoc/Rfc outbound adapters are used (as tRfc layer is fast and can handle quotas)
- receiver is fast and can’t get overloaded
- no expensive CBR (content based routing) is used
Thanks
Swarup
Edited by: Swarup Sawant on Feb 26, 2008 6:33 AM

Similar Messages

  • Tuning parameter to cater number of users

    Hi Folks,
    I am in a set up of the new database where i need to set the tuning parameter to cater/serve 2000 concurrent users.
    what could be the tuning parameter's that i need to setup .
    database connection pool size = ?
    max process= ?
    also do we need to have a down time for this operation?
    any suggestion is highly apprciated .
    we have oracle 11g database on linux environment .
    Thanks in advance .
    Edited by: 790072 on 15/05/2012 18:53

    790072 wrote:
    Hi Thanks for the quick reply ,
    what could be the configuration parameters for this ?
    say for example if i give the parameter
    max process= 2000
    and database connection pool size = 2000
    will this going to serve 2000 concurrent users?What about background server session?
    What about application batch jobs?
    It appears you have little real world experience with connection pooling & OLTP environments.
    While there might be 2000 "concurrent" users, there rarely or NEVER will be 2000 concurrent SQL.
    Most of the time while a user is in front of a keyboard, the session & keyboard are 100% IDLE!

  • Message Packaging feature and PI Integration engine tuning

    Hi Folks,
    I am trying to tune up the IEngine.
    1. Do i need to restart the system whenever i make a change to any of the IE parameter. eg: EO_OUTBOUND_PARALLEL
    2. Can someone help me by giving the useful transaction codes that I would need from a system prospective to check/measure the performance of the system.
    Eg. CPU utilization, Dialogue processes free/used,
    Message packaging is a new feature with PI 7.1
    Can someone please guide me on how to implement this step by step?
    Your inputs are very much appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Hank

    Hello,
    1. Integration engine tuning - No, you dont need to restart the system after changing a integration engine tuning parameter in SXMB_ADM, its a online change.
    2. system performance - use transactions st03 and st06 (cpu and workload). db02 for database. sm66, sm51 (work process)
    3. message packaging - check out this document for step by step configuration and a case study of message packaging
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10b54994-f569-2a10-ad8f-cf5c68a9447c?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    hope this helps.
    regards,
    francis

  • FREELIST TUNING(FREELIST의 CONTENTION 확인 방법)

    제품 : ORACLE SERVER
    작성날짜 : 2002-05-15
    Freelist Tuning(Freelist의 contention 확인 방법)
    ==================================================
    PURPOSE
    Freelist Tuning은 Process Freelist 와 Freelist Group의 contention을 최소화하기 위한 것이다.
    Explanation
    1. Freelist의 종류(Bul. 11101)
    : Freelist는 master freelist, process freelist, transaction freelist가 있다.
    (1) Master freelist: Oracle의 내부 메커니즘에 의해 자동으로 생성되며
    모든 process가 access할 수 있고 commit된 transaction에 의해
    transaction freelist의 free block을 포함한다.
    (2) Process freelist: Create시에 storage option에 freelist 설정시 생성되는 freelist로
    process는 자신에게 할당되어 있는 process freelist에 대해서만 사용 가능하다.
    master freelist 와 마찬가지로 committed free blicks을 포함하며,
    동시작업이 많은 환경에서 master freelist의 header의 contention을
    줄이위한 목적으로 사용된다.(8.1.6 이상 부터는 alter command로 freelist 변경이 가능하다.)
    (3) Transaction freelist: 모든 transaction에게 할당되는 freelist로
    하나의 segment에 최소한 16개의 transaction free list가 있으며,
    블럭이 찰 때까지 필요에 따라 증가된다.
    transaction내의 update/delete작업에 의해 free된 블럭을 포함하며,
    current(active) transaction 만이 자신의 freelist를 사용하게 된다.
    transaction이 commit이 되면, transaction freelist에 있던 block은
    master나 process freelist로 옮겨진다.
    2. Process freelist contention
    : Single intance에서 한개의 master freelist만을 사용하게 될 경우
    freelist contention이 발생될 수 있다.
    그러므로 object생성시에 여러개의 process freelist를 사용하도록
    freelist를 설정하게 되면 한 table에 대해 동시에 free block를 찾게 됨으로써
    발생하는 contention을 줄일 수 있다.
    : Freelist를 효과적으로 이용하려면 oracle에 의해
    extent가 자동으로 allocation되는것을 최소화하고
    extent를 object 생성시에 정의를 하는 것이 좋다.
    이유는 table에 자동으로 extent가 할당되는 경우 master pool(common pool)에
    block을 추가하게 되므로 contention을 야기시킬 수 있다.
    3. Freelist group contention
    : OPS환경에서 instance간의 freelist contention을 줄이기 위해 freelist group를
    설정할 수 있다. group의 수는 OPS의 node수와 동일하게 설정하는것이 일반적이다.
    4. Freelist Tuning Parameter
    1) PCTUSED
    2) PCTFREE
    3) Process freelist
    4) Fresslist group
    5. Freelist contention 확인 방법
    : v$waitstat와 v$system_event에서 buffer busy wait event를 찾고
    v$session_wait에서 waiting중인 session의 file#, block# 를 통해
    object name과 freelist 갯수를 알아낸다.
    1) v$waitstat 에서 data block, segment header value가 높고
    v$system_event에서 buffer busy waits 에서 total_wait, total_time이 높으면
    freelist contention 을 의심해 보아야 한다.
    SVRMGR> select * from v$waitstat;
    SVRMGR> select * from v$system_Event;
    2) v$session_wait에서 buffer busy waits 에서
    대기중인 session의 P1(file#), P2(block#), P3(id)를 찾아
    object name과 freelist 갯수를 찾는다.
    SVRMGR> select * from v$session_Wait;
    SVRMGR> select segment_name, segment_type
    from dba_extents
    where file_id=file#
    and block between id and id + block#;
    위에서 확인한 segment_name과 segment_type을 이용하여
    freelist 갯수를 확인한다.
    SVRMGR> select segment_name, freelists
    from dba_segments
    where segment_name=segment
    and segment_type=type;
    3) Freelist tuning
    : Freelist 의 default 갯수는 1이고 적절한 갯수는 동시에 동일한 table(index, cluster...)에
    insert를 할 수 있는 process의 갯수로 지정하는것이 적당하다.
    일반적으로 CPU 수 만큼 설정하면 충분하다.
    6. 그외 event
    (1) select * From v$waitstat; 에서 buffer busy wait 인 class가 data block일 경우
    Solution) pctfree/pctused를 바꾸거나 DB_BLOCK_SIZE를 줄여서 block당 rows수를 줄인다.
    (2) select * From v$waitstat; 에서 class가 segment header일 경우
    Solution) freelists를 사용하시거나 freelists의 수를 늘려준다.
    table이 정기적으로 커지는 경우 너무 작은 extent size는 header에 contention을 일으킬수 있다.
    이럴경우 table의 extent size를 늘려 주시는 것을 고려해 보아야 한다.
    (3) select * From v$waitstat; 에서 class가 undo header일 경우
    Solution) rollback segment당 transaction수를 줄이기 위해서
    rollback segments 를 더 추가한다.
    (4) select * From v$waitstat; 에서 class가 undo block일경우
    Solution) exclusive mode에서 rollback segments를 더 크게 만들어야 한다.
    Reference Ducumment
    Note. 76702.1
    Note. 1029850.6

  • Web Server Tuning

    Hi there,
    Actually I have a full iPlanet solution up running on Solaris 8 environment, which contains:
    -     iPlanet Application Server 6.5
    -     iPlanet Directory Server 4.1
    -     iPlanet Web Server 4.1
    -     iPlanet Integration Server (EAI) 2.6
    -     iPlanet Portal Server 3.0
    And I want to monitor the Web Server performance and to tune the required parameters.
    So that, firstly I want to know what is the services that I should monitor to make sure that the Web Server is up and running and performing well.
    And then, I want to know if there is any tool which can help me evaluate the Web Server performance and find out the proper tuning parameter in case if it is needed.
    Many Thanks

    The Performance Tuning Guide for iWS4.1 will be able to help get you started:
    http://docs.sun.com/source/816-5679-10/index.html

  • Application Server Tuning

    Hi there,
    Actually I have a full iPlanet solution up running on Solaris 8 environment, which contains:
    -iPlanet Application Server 6.5
    -iPlanet Directory Server 4.1
    -iPlanet Web Server 4.1
    -iPlanet Integration Server (EAI) 2.6
    -iPlanet Portal Server 3.0
    -Netegrity Site Minder
    And I want to monitor the Application Server performance and to tune the required parameters.
    So that, firstly I want to know what is the services that I should monitor to make sure that the Application Server is up and running and performing well.
    And then, I want to know if there is any tool which can help me evaluate the Application Server performance and find out the proper tuning parameter in case if it is needed.
    Many Thanks

    There are some tuning tips available at the following url :
    http://docs.sun.com/source/816-5794-11/index.html
    hope this might help a bit !!

  • Load balancing BW data loads

    Hi all,
    I have a BW 3.5 system running on Oracle 9.2.0.5.
    What I would like to do is to set BW to pick a particular R/3 application server for my data loads.
    Is it possible?
    Best Regards
    Mark

    Hi Mark,
    Load balancing can be done at BW side to pick any specific application server.
    You have an SAP BW system with several (application) servers. You would like to distribute the workload of the data loads and other data warehouse management activities in a way that fits your needs best. This could mean that you would like to have all processes distributed across all available servers or that you would like to have one dedicated server for these processes.
    Check: [Load Balancing|http://www.scribd.com/doc/7838988/KnowHow-to-SAP-BW-Data-Load-Performance-Analysis-and-Tuning]
    [Load balancing 1|http://rapidshare.com/files/157988927/load_balancing_in_BW_data_loads.pdf]
    Hope it Helps
    Srini

  • Is there any way to harden Dovecot against POP/IMAP denial of service attacks?

    It doesn’t happen very often, but every so often a script kiddie on the Internet hits Dovecot's POP ports on our mail server hard enough to bring mail service to a crawl such that legit users can’t log in to retrieve their mail.  I would say that with our 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo Mac Mini Server, when we receive sustained POP login attacks that exceed ten logins per second, then eventually Dovecot gets swamped with so many requests that legit users are excluded.  [Our server runs runs OS X Server 10.6.8-10K549, by the way, and Dovecot 1.1.2apple0.5 is installed as determined by running “dovecotd --version”.  We keep the mail sever up to date with all available Apple software updates on a weekly basis, so we have the latest and greatest security updates.]
    Here’s the problem: I’ve been studying the Dovecot 1.x Wiki at http://wiki1.dovecot.org/ and finding a number of parameters that *sort* of address this denial-of-service vulnerability, but none that appear to harden Dovecot in a similar fashion as ssh or sftp are hardened.  By this, I mean that when ssh or sftp detect multiple login attempts originating from the same address above some threshold, then future login attempts are ignored for a solid fifteen minutes no matter what the login name was in the attempts.  I’d like something similar for Dovecot.
    I am aware of the “mail_max_userip_connections” setting which can be set independently for POP and IMAP service (see http://wiki1.dovecot.org/MainConfig?highlight=%28mail_max_userip_connections%29).  This almost does what I want in that it indeed restricts the number of logins for a particular user coming from a single IP address.  The problem is that the script kiddies typically scatter their attacks over hundreds of different login names and they may only attempt three or four logins per user name.  What I really want is a parameter which starts to ignore logins no matter what the user name if too many come from a single IP address at the same time.  Against this, I also need to balance my mail server restrictions to allow perhaps five or ten of my users with laptops to be behind a remote firewall, so all of their legit logins may hit my server perhaps three to ten at a time which could potentially look like an attack if my tuning parameter is set too low.  What I’d really like to find is a tuning parameter that excludes concerted attacks without excluding my legitimate users.  I also don’t want to invest in extremely expensive (>$10,000) “smart” firewalls that adaptively look for this type of attack, such as are offered by Netgear and other networking equipment manufacturers.
    By examining /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf on my mail server, it seems that Apple’s defaults are to set IMAP mail_max_userip_connections to 20, and for POP to leave the mail_max_userip_connections parameter commented out.  Would there be any downside to enabling POP's mail_max_userip_connections to 20 as well?  Offhand I can’t see how this would affect my users.  Unfortunately, I also think that if I set the POP mail_max_userip_connections to 20 this won’t have any effect on the attackers since they typically won’t try 20 different passwords for the same login name in a given attack.  I’ll post a segment of a log showing an actual attack that occurred today from the San Bernadino School District that I’ve since blocked in my network’s firewall, but it will illustrate the type of hard-core denial-of-service attack that I’m referring to.  The login attempts were coming in fast, around forty-per-second, and my mail service went down in a matter of minutes as a result.  [Yes: I will report this user…  I haven’t gotten around to it yet with other issues.]
    Any thoughts?

    Here’s a ten second snippet from my mail server's log, showing how intense the login frequency was from the attacker, and also how (s)he was "scattering" the login names used which I suspect would be quite hard to filter out using POP's mail_max_userip_connections parameter.  The attack lasted from 1:43:39 through a server restart at 1:50:18, and even about a minute later.  The attack stopped at 1:51:36 before I was able to add a firewalling rule to my router or to exclude logins from the 163.150/16 subnet from my router [FYI — that's the San Bernadino Country School District, according to http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-163-150-0-0-1/pft ].
    Any thoughts on how to block this type of POP attack in Dovecot?
    [FYI — I changed my actual server name to 'myserver' and the actual admin name to 'Administrator'.]
    Jan 13 13:43:39 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(root,163.150.246.27): user account: root not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:39 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](admin,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:39 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(admin,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: admin
    Jan 13 13:43:39 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(webmaster,163.150.246.27): Credentials could not be verified username or password is invalid.
    Jan 13 13:43:39 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](user,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:39 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(user,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: user
    Jan 13 13:43:39 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](test,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:39 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(test,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: test
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](web,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(web,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: web
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(www,163.150.246.27): user account: _www not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(administrator,163.150.246.27): user account: Administrator not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(root,163.150.246.27): user account: root not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](admin,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(admin,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: admin
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](sybase,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(sybase,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: sybase
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](informix,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(informix,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: informix
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(root,163.150.246.27): user account: root not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(webmaster,163.150.246.27): Credentials could not be verified username or password is invalid.
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle8,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle8,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle8
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(backup,163.150.246.27): user account: backup not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(root,163.150.246.27): user account: root not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(webmaster,163.150.246.27): Credentials could not be verified username or password is invalid.
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](lizdy,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(lizdy,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: lizdy
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](test,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(test,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: test
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](user,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:40 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(user,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](web,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(web,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: web
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](admin,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(admin,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: admin
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(www,163.150.246.27): user account: _www not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](server,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(server,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: server
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](test,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(test,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: test
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](data,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(data,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: data
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(administrator,163.150.246.27): user account: Administrator not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](web,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(web,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: web
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(webmaster,163.150.246.27): Credentials could not be verified username or password is invalid.
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](user,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(user,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](account,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(account,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: account
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(www,163.150.246.27): user account: _www not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](sybase,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(sybase,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: sybase
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](test,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(test,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: test
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](access,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(access,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: access
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(administrator,163.150.246.27): user account: Administrator not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](web,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(web,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: web
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](pwrchute,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(pwrchute,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: pwrchute
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](informix,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(informix,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: informix
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(www,163.150.246.27): user account: _www not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](sybase,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(sybase,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: sybase
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle8,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle8,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle8
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(administrator,163.150.246.27): user account: Administrator not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](informix,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(informix,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: informix
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](test,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(test,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: test
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](admin,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(admin,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: admin
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(backup,163.150.246.27): user account: backup not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](user,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(user,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(webmaster,163.150.246.27): Credentials could not be verified username or password is invalid.
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(root,163.150.246.27): user account: root not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](lizdy,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(lizdy,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: lizdy
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle8,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle8,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle8
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](sybase,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(sybase,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: sybase
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(backup,163.150.246.27): user account: backup not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](server,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(server,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: server
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](user,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(user,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(root,163.150.246.27): user account: root not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](admin,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(admin,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: admin
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](informix,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:41 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(informix,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: informix
    Jan 13 13:43:42 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](lizdy,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:42 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(lizdy,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: lizdy
    Jan 13 13:43:42 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](admin,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:42 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(admin,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: admin
    Jan 13 13:43:42 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](data,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:42 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(data,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: data
    Jan 13 13:43:42 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle8,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:42 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle8,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle8
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(webmaster,163.150.246.27): Credentials could not be verified username or password is invalid.
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(backup,163.150.246.27): user account: backup not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](user,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(user,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](access,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(access,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: access
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](pwrchute,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(pwrchute,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: pwrchute
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](server,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(server,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: server
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](server,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(server,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: server
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](data,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(data,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: data
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](lizdy,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(lizdy,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: lizdy
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(root,163.150.246.27): user account: root not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](account,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(account,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: account
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](test,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(test,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: test
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](web,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(web,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: web
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](access,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(access,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: access
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](admin,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(admin,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: admin
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](account,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(account,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: account
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](data,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(data,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: data
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(www,163.150.246.27): user account: _www not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](admin,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(admin,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: admin
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(administrator,163.150.246.27): user account: Administrator not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(www,163.150.246.27): user account: _www not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle8,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle8,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle8
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(administrator,163.150.246.27): user account: Administrator not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle8,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:44 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle8,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle8
    Jan 13 13:43:46 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(webmaster,163.150.246.27): Credentials could not be verified username or password is invalid.
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](data,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(data,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: data
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](lizdy,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(lizdy,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: lizdy
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](admin,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(admin,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: admin
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(backup,163.150.246.27): user account: backup not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](user,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(user,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](admin,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(admin,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: admin
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](test,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(test,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: test
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](web,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(web,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: web
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](account,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(account,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: account
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(www,163.150.246.27): user account: _www not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](admin,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(admin,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: admin
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(backup,163.150.246.27): user account: backup not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle8,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle8,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle8
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](web,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(web,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: web
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](web,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(web,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: web
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](informix,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(informix,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: informix
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](oracle,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(oracle,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: oracle
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](test,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(test,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: test
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](lizdy,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(lizdy,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: lizdy
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(backup,163.150.246.27): user account: backup not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(www,163.150.246.27): user account: _www not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](sybase,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(sybase,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: sybase
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(administrator,163.150.246.27): user account: Administrator not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(root,163.150.246.27): user account: root not enabled for mail
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](sybase,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(sybase,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: sybase
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](informix,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(informix,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: informix
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](sybase,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(sybase,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: sybase
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od[getpwnam_ext](server,163.150.246.27): No record for user
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(server,163.150.246.27): lookup failed for user: server
    Jan 13 13:43:48 myserver dovecot[72]: auth(default): od(www,163.150.246.27): user account: _www not enabled for mail

  • Lightroom 5.2 64-bit not using all of computer's resources?

    Hi,
    Ive got a question. I have the following custom-built lightroom and photoshop machine:
    -Windows 8 64-bit
    -8092 Mb 1600Mhz RAM
    -Intel i7 2600k Quadcore processor with 8 logical processors running at 4Ghz
    -Corsair SSD that stores Lightroom catalog.
    When I am creating 1:1 previews from a Nikon D800 (Huge 74Mb RAW files) Lightroom only uses about 25% of my CPU power (sometimes it tops out at around 50% for a second) and about 3.3GBs of RAM
    which results in relatively slow performance. Why isnt Lightroom using more resources? It barely is using the workhorse components I put in this machine.
    Ive added a screenshot from the performance monitor during the generation of 500+ 1:1 previews.
    Is there anything I can do to help it? Generating 500+ Full 14bit RAW files from the D800 could surely benefit from using the computers' full computing capabilities?
    Thanks,
    Morgan

    Check the CPU area of Resource Monitor and see what the individual core usage, is, and whether they are being simultaneously used or not.
    LR appears to export images sequentially, too; however, when an individual image is being rendered, 7 of 8 of the cores of my quad Xeon appear to be in use to 80-90% for a moment, so at least the CPU-intensive part of the process is using multiple threads.
    The source and destination of the images are a USB2-attached hard-drive so there is an I/O bottleneck, but the total-CPU is jumping between 33% and 66% most of the time, and in resource-monitor, I can see the usage of the 7 of 8 cores rising and falling in unison, so it’s not like something is using only one by swapping amongst them, they are almost all being used.
    What’s doesn't appear to be happening is the rendering phase of one image overlapping the I/O phase of another image, where you have to run multiple exports in parallel to have that occur.
    Generally, it appears that images are processed one-by-one whenever you tell LR to do an operation on a group of images, but within the processing of a specific image, certain CPU-intensive phases are highly multithreaded.
    I too, wish I could tell LR to do things more in parallel when multiple images were involved, but it does require a different way of organizing operations on multiple images, and apparently LR is not architected this way. 
    The way Exports work on my computer, I see images written in order, one by one, and I see the CPU usage, across most of the cores, peaking once per image.  To me this suggests the following processing is occurring for each image and the entire process for one image must complete before the next image is started:
    Select next image to work on, read-image, multithread-render, write-image, repeat until no more images.
    Think about what LR could do to keep things busier.  There could be three processing threads each performing a portion of the Export process for each image, and the pacing set by each phase not getting too far ahead of the subsequent phase:
    1 Read-thread:  Wait until there are less than X images waiting to be rendered, read new image into memory, send that image to render queue, repeat until no more images.
    2 Render-thread:  Wait until there is at least one image to render but also less than Y images waiting to be written, multithread-render the waiting image, send it to write-queue, repeat until no more images.
    3 Write-thread: Wait until there is at least one image to write, write the next image from write queue, repeat until no more images.
    There are two tuning parameters, X as the number of images to read into memory, and Y as the number of images to render into memory before waiting for previously-rendered images to be written out.
    If the reading is slower the the CPU-rendering (an I/O bottleneck), then the process would appear to be single-threaded, because we're always waiting on more data to be read in before the CPU can be used.  The fact that you can speed up Exporting by running two or three simultaneously, suggests reading is not the slowest thing occurring.
    The X and Y limiting parameters are needed in case the render or writing is much slower than the reading; otherwise, reading and rendering each use some memory per image and all the memory on the computer would be exhausted, waiting for the writing process to catch up, and memory swapping would start to occur which would interfere with the writing process, and grind things to a halt.
    If X and Y were set to 1 or 2 images, each, then the process would be reasonably efficient with memory because we wouldn't be queuing up too many images in memory waiting for them to be rendered or written, but we also would be overlapping the reading and writing of images with the rendering of images, just to keep things as busy as possible.
    Another factor is that memory is being used to store image data when it is passed between the various stages, so if memory is slow, then it wouldn't matter how much overlapping of the I/O and CPU there was.
    Different sized images, simple or complex operations being applied, and different system configurations will impact balance of I/O and CPU and Memory and it would be nice to LR to be able to automatically, or at least by power-user tuning parameter adjustments, adapt to each by using some parallel image processing with tunable parameters at least as sophisticated as outlined, above, it if doesn't already do so.

  • Cannot use duplicate table name error in AMDP

    Hi Experts,
    I'm developing an application which has the following architecture
    SAP UI5->Gateway->ABAP Managed DB procedures(AMDP)->HANA SP(Stored Procedure)
    We are having a very peculiar problem where the gateway service works inconsistently for the same input data.
    i.e If I execute the same service n number of times, I get the results successfully for say n-3 times but the other 3 times I get a "RFC Error :Error while executing Database procedure"
    There is no change in the input data or DB table data during all the executions.
    Running the stored procedure stand alone in HANA studio works all the time.
    We tried executing the AMDP from SE24 and the same behavior occurred.
    When trouble shooting we found that the exception occurs inside the AMDP when the call db procedure statement is executed.
    Could you please advise what could be the possible reason for this any tuning parameter/unavailability of db connections?
    Or could you please suggest some other troubleshooting mechanism by which we can zero in on the cause?
    When I go in the debug mode I can see the exact error as
    cannot use duplicate table name:  [288] SAPXXX.ZCL_PLAN_MAINTENANCE=>GET_COMP_TYPE#stub#20140905055908: line 15 col 3 (at pos 492): cannot use duplicate table name exception:
    where ZCL_PLAN_MAINTENANCE=>GET_COMP_TYPE is the AMDP class and method. SAPXXXis the schema.

    I reported this to Adobe customer support on 11/29, and here is their response:
    Wednesday, December 5, 2007 12:51:27 PM PST
    Hello John,
    Thank you for contacting Adobe® Web Support for assistance with Adobe
    Photoshop Elements® 6.0.
    I understand that images are deleted if you accidentally try to move
    them to a folder that already includes a file of the same name.
    Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I was able to replicate
    this behavior as well. The best method to report errors of this nature
    is using the following form on our website:
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
    I will report this to the product team through my channels. You may want to submit this issue through the web form as it goes directly to the product development team.
    I hope this information helps to resolve your issue. If you require
    further assistance with this issue, please update your web case with
    complete details, including what steps you have applied and any error
    messages you are receiving.
    You may also call Technical Support at (800) 642-3623. We are available from 6:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday - Friday, Pacific Time.
    Kind regards,
    Alan C.
    Adobe Web Support

  • XI 3.0 queues stop and deactivate

    Hi,
    We are getting everyday the same problems with XBTO* queues.
    With a set of Idocs (about 200-500) entering in XI 3.0, usually LUW's are stoped in queues XBTO* (scheduled for outbound).
    We have registered this type of queues and the properties are:
       - Type: R
       - Mode: D
       - Max Runtime: 60
       - Attemps: 30
       - Pause: 300
    Are these properties ok?
    How can I improve the performance of the queue processing?
    Is there any option (job or something like this) to reactivate automatically the queues that are stoped?
    In transaction Display Registered XI Queues, I can see that XBTO* has 4,5% time.
    Thank you
    Best regards
    Luis

    The following talk about resource allocation for RFC:
    Note 74141
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/62/73241e03337442b1bc1932c2ff8196/frameset.htm
    Your total # of DIA WPs should be greater than the number of all other types of WPs according to the above docs.
    That means that it should be greater than 10. There are also other tuning parameter in the note and the help section listed above that you may need to set. They control what % of the DIA WPs RFC processes can use compared with logged in users.

  • Error in communication channel javaxresourse.Resourseexception

    We are getting an error in communication channel javax.resourse.Resourseexception. We are send a payload witn size in excess of 10mb. I also have a message which is in delivering status for quite some time now after which our communication channel stopped working and startwd to give tthis error. Could it because of this message ? Or i need to increase size parameter . In which tcode or place wherei can see the permited file size. I am new to pi and and seeing this error for tje firat time . Request your  help

    >Could it because of this message ? Or i need to increase size parameter . In which tcode or place wherei can see the permited file size. I am new to pi and and seeing this error for tje firat time . Request your help
    Go to SXMB_ADM and click integration engine configuration -> click edit mode configuration -> see the tuning parameter EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT set and value of it. If it not set, talk to basis to set the this tuning parmeter and value desired.
    Search SDN on this topic for further details

  • Focus on field in row created with CreateInsert action

    I have an ADF Faces page that opens with an empty view object - backed table. A 'New' button (createinsert action) is used to create new records. When the user clicks 'New' I'd like the focus to go to the first field on the newly created row.
    I don't believe the afh:body level parameter InitialFocusId is an option since the field doesn't exist when the page is first rendered. Any ideas on how to achieve this functionality?
    Thanks

    Right now the view object for this table has the Tuning parameter 'No Rows' set. I'm assuming having one blank row in the table when the page is rendered would make it easier to set the focus to a particular field. Any suggestions on how to achieve that?

  • Async proxy to soap messages to be processed like EOIO

    Hi,
    I have a proxy to soap interface. What I want is to route these message these message through one queue in IE level so that, these would be sent to the receiver in order. Also doing this confirm that at the AE level, they would be delivered in order?
    I looked at the tuning parameter for eo_outbound_parallel with the reveiver id, but it is routing all the messages to the receiver system in one queue. but I want this only for one interface.
    any ideas?
    thanks.
    Sri

    This is what I have observed -
    Asynchronous interfaces.
    Maintain Order at Runtime checked in the interface determination.
    It is an enhanced interface determination producing at the most 3 messages.
    When the mapping produced just one message -
    In RWB when I checked for the messages processed under integration engine, I found Quality of Service - EO.
    At the adapter engine level also the quality of service is - EO
    The converstion ID in this case is blank
    When the mapping produced more than one message -
    In RWB when I checked for the messages processed under integration engine, I found Quality of Service - EO.
    At the adapter engine level also the quality of service is - EOIO
    The converstion ID in this case is non blank. (this is different at different times. But all of the message generated at the same mapping split have the same value)
    So what I understood is, only when there are multiple messages getting generated from the split mapping, only then the AE takes care that only these messages (generated at that instance) would be delivered in order.
    Any other observations are welcome.
    VJ

  • Handling Adapter Errors

    I have a BPM that receives Soap messages sends a synchronous response then sends them to an R3 system.  Inside the BPM, around the send step I have a block with an Exception handler to catch any errors that are generated by the call so that I can retry sending the message. 
    However, when an error occurs, eg the R3 system is taken down for maintenance, I get an XI error which does not get thrown back to the BPM exception handler.
    Has anyone else got this to work or have any suggestions?
    Thanks
    Ian

    Hi Ian,
    You can set the Integration Server to automatically retry any deliver any messages failed due to a comms issue. In the Integration Server administration SXMB_ADM, run the option for Integration Engine configuration.
    In here, click on <b>Specific Configuration</b>. Add an entry for category TUNING parameter IS_RETRY_LIMIT with a value of say 25.
    This will force the Integration Engine to attempt 25 retries for delivery.
    This retry interval is 2 minutes and is not changeable.
    The message will be displayed in SXMB_MONI with a different icon instead of a red flag.
    Does this help at all ?
    Cheers
    Colin.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem in Tabstrip Control

    Hi All, i had created an Custom Infotype. In that infotype i had created Tabstrip control with 2tabs. Each Tab contain 4 fields. When creating( F5) a record in transaction PA30, it allowing me create a record and the record is available in Data base

  • Isight problem with windows

    hi i have a serious problem with my isight... i installed win xp using the boot camp,after 1 month the isight is stopped working and i found under the device manager "DFU Loader" i did the SMC and PRAM,it works maybe for 2 or 3 days then the same pro

  • Imix rating still not working

    Win XP, itunes 7.0.1, brand new dell c521 with latest drivers, obviously clean install. Italian itunes store. Same issue as with previous pc: imix rating screwed up. If I rate an imix 5 stars, it turns out to be 1. Anything from 4 stars to 1 gives a

  • PL/SQL After submit process - best practice?

    I have after submit process which fires PL/SQL procedure. In this PL/SQL procedure I do some updates and would also like to generate some XML output and send it to browser so that user can save it in file. What I'm asking is, what is proper way to ha

  • Why doesn't Time Machine work after upgrading OS to 10.7.5?

    I have late 2007 MBP 3.1 and late 2008 iMac both of which I upgraded with the combo client software release recently.  Now I cannot get Time Machine to work on either machine. I use a Seagate 1.5 TB firewire external drive for backups - it checked ou