Two plant but common product

Dear all,
I have two plant say A and B. Now if one customer give me order of 100 units then system should check the dependent material stock from both plant and should suggest me that were i should release the production order.
Phalgun Patel

Phalgun,
Surely you are joking. Even if I were disposed to share such a proprietary solution with you, I would be prevented by the various non-disclosure agreements I have signed. I never publish enhanced solutions in these forums.
You can start by creating the functional specs for the solution you require. Then, hand them off to your internal developers.
Companies that are unable to manage the task of creating customized solutions for themselves normally engage an experienced consulting company to perform the task for them.
Best Regards,
DB49

Similar Messages

Exists function- For common products in two sets

Hi All ,
I have this below mdx query , where i want the common products that were submitted in december 2014 and present in the following two sets
i) First Set : List of apps which are set by required attribute in ManualReview dimension as "true" ,result attribute is "fail" for them and Submitted date is
December 2014
ii) Second set : List of products where IsAutopassed is "True" and Submitted date is
December 2014 .
Below is the mdx query for this. But i am not able to get common products out of these two sets . i.e. i want to implement the sql functionality of
SELECT * FROM SET1 WHERE PRODUCTID IN ( SELECT PRODUCTID FROM SET2)
SELECT
non empty
EXISTS(
[DimProduct].[ProductId].[ProductId].members,[DimManualReview].[Required].&[True],
[DimResult].[Result].&[Fail],
[DimSubmittedDate].[Calendar Date Hierarchy].[Year].&[Calendar 2014].&[Quarter 4, 2014].&[December 2014]
[DimProduct].[ProductId].[ProductId].members, [DimProductSubmission].[IsAutoPassed].&[True],
[DimSubmittedDate].[Calendar Date Hierarchy].[Year].&[Calendar 2014].&[Quarter 4, 2014].&[December 2014]
) ) ON ROWS,
non empty [Measures].[ProductCount] ON columns
FROM RAD
Please help me in getting in to a right direction.

Hi NedunuriRajesh,
According to your description, you want to get the common member from two sets. Right?
In this scenario, I suggest you use INTERSECT() the intersection of two input sets. Please try the MDX below:
SELECT
non empty
INTERSECT(
[DimProduct].[ProductId].[ProductId].members,[DimManualReview].[Required].&[True],
[DimResult].[Result].&[Fail],
[DimSubmittedDate].[Calendar Date Hierarchy].[Year].&[Calendar
2014].&[Quarter 4,
2014].&[December 2014]
[DimProduct].[ProductId].[ProductId].members,
[DimProductSubmission].[IsAutoPassed].&[True],
[DimSubmittedDate].[Calendar Date Hierarchy].[Year].&[Calendar
2014].&[Quarter 4,
2014].&[December 2014]
ON ROWS,
non empty [Measures].[ProductCount]
ON columns
FROM RAD
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Simon Hou
TechNet Community Support

I need to add a new computer and take off a old one but can't find the site or place to turn it off i can only have two computers but i got three please help let me know where to go to shut one off to put the new one on?

i need to add a new computer and take off a old one but can't find the site or place to turn it off i can only have two computers but i got three please help let me know where to go to shut one off to put the new one on?

Hello,
the way is written there Activation & deactivation help >>> (see there only to understand the procedure) Common activation problems >>> "Activation limit reached for [product]. This serial number has already been activated on 2 computers." "Maximum activations exceeded."
>>> How to deactivate or sign out >>> A single license for Adobe software lets you install the applications on two computers—for example, at home and at the office. However, you can use the software on only one computer at any given time.
If you want to install the software on a third computer, deactivate the software on the computer on which you will no longer use the software. Then, activate the software on the new computer.
Hans-Günter

Master data maintenance for two plants

Dear All,
there are two plants having same materials on both plants. sohow can we maintain aster data for both plants,
should we create MICs for both plants,
and inspection plan for both plants

But you are then making the same product using 4 different methods! That is terrible from a quality perspective. If I'm a customer I don't want to have to worry about what plant made it. It totally goes against having standard specs. Quality should be consistent across plants. You can manufacture it however you want, but the quality control, i.e. the tests and specs used must all be the same across all plants. Its one of the reasons SAP is designed the way it is. (One exception may be if a country requires a specific test for a product that other countries don't.)
As far as changing specs and adding/deleting characteristics, those aren't things that should be changing very much. Testing and specs should be pretty static data once it is created. Coordinating changes shouldn't be that difficult. Even when using separate plans you still need interplant coordination. The last thing you want is to wind up with 4 different specs being used across 4 different plants.
It also means anything like COA's or certificates have to be managed much differently with a much higher level of maintenance. Using any features of batch management are almost totally wiped out. You could maintain separate plans and utilize the same MIC's however and use batch management. But using separate MICS would really hurt the usage of batch classification. Comparing quality between plants becomes much, much harder. Reports can't be consistent.
My biggest objection is not that you would want to do this. I can understand that there may be a unique sitiation out there that requires separate plans and maybe separate MICS as well. But you told the poster that it was required to use separate inspection plans at different plants.
I know not everyone sees and knows everything about everything. I certainly don't and I've made mistakes. But if we are going to post advice and solutions, we need to try and make sure it's correct information.

Billing in Stock Transfer between two plants of two different company codes

Hi Friends,
I am doing the scenario of stock transfer between two plants of different company codes.
I have some issues in Billing for this..
What are the settings do i need to to for Pricing in SD point of view.
Ex:
Supplying         /         Receiving
Com.Code:2000     /        CompanyCode:1000
Plant:2100              /         Plant:1100
SA:2000/10/00      /          SA:1000/10/00
I created Customer 5555 w.r.t sales area of supplying company code (2000/10/00)
I created Vendor 7777 and assigned Supplying Plant 2100 in add purchasing data.
In IMG Settings:
Define Shipping Data for Plants: In Receving Plant i assigned customer 5555 and sales area blank
                                                    In Supplying Plant i assigned customer blank and sales area as 2000/10/00
Create Checking Rule: Standard(B SD Delivery)
Define Checking Rule: Standard(Avallability-01assigned to checking rule B)
Assign Delivery Type and Checking rule: Document type(NB)-Supplying Plant(2100)-Delivery Type(NLCC)-Checking Rule-(B)
Assign Doc Type:Supplying Plant(2100)-Receving Plant(1100)-Doc type(NB)
What are Pricing settings in SD i have to do?????????
Process:
ME21N->VL10B->VL02N(PGI)->VF01(IV)->MIGO->MIRO
I have gone through many threads in Forum but confusion in Pricing Part..
Some are mixing with the inter company sales proces..
Pls guide me..
With Regards

Do the following steps for STO Customizing:-
1. Create a customer master record for the issuing plant.
2. Create a vendor master record for the issuing plant, and enter customer account number in the Customer field on the Control screen.
3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 for the receiving plant.
4. Assign the plants to the customer master record in Customizing for Materials Management (MM), by choosing Purchasing <Purchase Order < Set Up Stock Transport Order< Plants.
The Process Flow would be as follows :-
Create a stock transport order, following the standard procedure, and send the order to the issuing plant.
Issuing plant has processes your order, and when it is ready to ship,the storeperson at the issuing plant issues the goods using a transfer posting. The excise clerk there creates an excise invoice.The excise supervisor verifies and posts the excise invoice.It then sends the goods to you, together with the excise invoice.
Once the goods arrive, you follow the standard procedure for incoming excise invoices:
The excise clerk captures the excise invoice, using the stock transport order as the reference document. The storeperson enters the goods receipt, again using the stock transport order as the reference document.Alternatively, you can first enter the goods receipt and then capture the excise invoice.
The excise supervisor then posts the excise invoice.
Best Regards,
Ankur

Stock Transfer B/W Two Plants ( 303 & 305 )

Hi MM Experts.....
Im working with the scenario of two plant stock transfer ie., 303 & 305 and in need to control the posting date of 305 should be gerater or equal to the reference document ie., 303.
There is a field LFBNR - Document No. of Reference Document but i cannot find the reference doc number ie., 303 on that.
Im tried to figure out the reference document in the MKPF & MSEG table but i couldn't only for 303 & 305 document alone.
Please suggest me ......
Regards
MM-L.Senthil Kumar

There is no link between 303 and 305.
One moves stock from a storage location into in-transit, while the other posts from in-transit to a storage location.
Depending on the time one needs to transport the material physically, you can have stock of several movements done with 303 in in-transit.
Further you are looking for a way to restrict posting with an earlier receipt date than issue date, but this just assumes that the GR folks are working wrong, while the people who perform the goods issue are doing everything right.
You better analyse your process and talk with the receivers why they enter a earlier date. I doupt that they are doing this to mess around. I would even guess they are doing it because they received the goods at this earlier date, but could not perform the GR because the goods issue folks had not done their job.

One Material with two Different In-House Production Days

Dear Experts,
We have 1 semi-finished material (HALB) that is common to two different locations (production version) with two different in-house Production days. How can we separate the 2 different in- house prod. days for this specific material? Could we setup in the production version? if not, could you give us an advice.
Ex:
JDXZ011111 with Prod. version I000 = 3 days
JDXZ011111 with Prod. version X000 = 1 day
We are hoping for your help..
Thank you.
Regards,
Marnelli

Dear Mamelli,
1.You cannot maintain the in-house production time in the production version.
2.In-house production time in days can be maintained in MRP2 view.
3.If Lead time scheduling is carried out at the time of MRP run then the system uses the in-house time for the calcualtion onf basic
start and end dates.Based on the routing data the system proposes the production start and end time.
4.Generally exception messages 64 Production finish after order finish
63 Production start before order start are shown after MRP run.
5.If basic scheduling is carried out then the system proposes only the basic dates.
Regards
S Mangalraj

Automatic creation of transportation lane between two Plants or location

Hi,
I am aware that when we cif Inforecords from R/3 to APO new transportation lanes automatically gets created between the Plant and Vendor.
The isssue which i am facing is that i want transportation lanes to be created between two plants . The TL should be created automatically. I could find the below details from sap help.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm41/helpdata/EN/3e/dfaf376ed96c21e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Transportation Lanes with Reference to R/3 Material Master Record
Storing a special procurement type with procurement type F: External Procurement and special procurement U: Stock Transfer (in the MRP 2 view of the R/3 material master record), means that the material has to be procured externally from another plant (supplying plant) or transferred from another plant.
To also be able to perform stock transfers for this material in the SAP APO system, there has to be a transportation lane from the supplying plant to the receiving plant. If you have transferred a material with this special procurement type from the SAP R/3 system, the SAP APO system automatically creates a corresponding transportation lane from the supplying plant to the receiving plant for the supplying plant (from the special procurement type) and material/plant combination. The transportation lane is given the creation indicator u201CSu201D for special procurement.
I am not able to make sense of special procurement U: Stock Transfer (in the MRP 2 view of the R/3 material master record),
Is this Special procurement some sort of customization as i could not find U: Stock Transfer in my implementation.
Please help me understand this. What exactly should i do to create TL between Plants automaticcaly through Cif.

You need to define setting in IMG for this from source to Target location.
Follow this path :
Production->Material Requirements ->Master Data->Define Special Procurement Type
example :
Plant      1004
SP type    40   Stock transfer (proc.from alter.plant)
Procurement type     F    External procurement
Special procurement U    Stock transfer
Plant                1039
Manish

STO - Two plants within Different Company Codes

Hello,
Kindly help me out with this case, i want to create a STO for two plants within DIFFERENT company codes, so i've created all the required configuration and master data including creating the supplying plant as a vendor and the ordering plant as a customer, also all master data is maintained in both plants and i tried the scenario on the IDES system and it works okay so i know i'm on the right procedures. The problem is that i create the PO, but when i go to Transaction Code VL10B to create the delivery it gives me an error ( Delivery with no Line item not allowed ) even though there is more than enough stock in the storage location. Kindly help me out.

17.01.2010     Stock                            10.500,000      0,000      10.300,000
13.01.2010     Order     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.300,000
13.01.2010     Deliv.     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.300,000
17.01.2010     StLcSt     SLFR     10.500,000      0,000      10.300,000
13.01.2010     Order     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.300,000
13.01.2010     Deliv.     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.300,000
17.01.2010     BtchSt     123     10.500,000      0,000      10.400,000
13.01.2010     Deliv.     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.400,000
17.01.2010     BStLoc     123       /SLFR     10.500,000      0,000      10.400,000
13.01.2010     Deliv.     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.400,000
This is the whole table.
This is what i got. i believe that it is an availability check problem, i just can't see what is the solution.
SLFR is the Storage location of the issuing plant.

Intrastat for goods movement between two plants

Dear All
I have question need your help.
Now we have two plants located in different countries, one plant is in NL (Netherlands), another plant is in DE (Germany).
And we transfer stock from NL to DE in SAP by MIGO(301). But actually this belongs to Import/Export business.
So we need to report to Intrastat system. So we need to do the intrastat declaration.
But could you tell me how I can realize the intrastat in SAP system.
Currently we manually do the intrastat.
Regards
Eva

For intrastat reporting you need to add a condition type in your pricing procedure GRWR.
Requiremnet routine 8 . Alct condition base value formula need to be created to read net value, if net value is zero then to read cost price.
Helpful links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/fr/2b/274520995111d1b4e30000e82d81b0/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/34/60b19dae724effe10000009b38f91f/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/34/60b1a0ae724effe10000009b38f91f/content.htm
Document on configruation:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&oi=spellmeleon_result&ct=result&cd=1&ved=0CBIQhgIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scmexpertonline.com%2Fdownloads%2FKees%2520Intrastat%2520download%25201-23-07.doc&rct=j&q=configurationforlegalreruiementsintrastat&ei=16n2S6HEEoqdlgfFlY2_CA&usg=AFQjCNFWXtBMAjyjJK9ZmxKuIj_3KEABaw
Hope this is helpful
Regards
Sai

DIMP - Two materials in same Production Order

Hello experts
anyone knows if it is possible combine two materials in one production orders with DIMP component?
The scenario is for print flexible packaging, in one flexo printing machine we can print 2 different product with similar structure and characteristics like width, weight, colors and so on.
This FERTs consume the same raw materials (BOPP Film, same colors of ink). the last process is cut the roll for obtain two different flexible packaging.

Dear Ismael,
You will have to test it, but i believe it's possible.
If the order BOM has co-product, then settlement will have 2 entries. You can change the ratio over there, to settle to one material. So, the costing will happen accoridnlgy. There's no change in logistic process.
Another option is to change BOM prior to creating the order, if you know the details beforehand. But, correcting master data is not a right practise.
Thanks
Prem

Stock transfer between two plants within same company code at price

Hello,
Hello
I have a scenarios. One plant is selling a part to other plant at a margin. Both plants belongs to the same legal entity.
How can I map this scenario in SAP?
What will be the cost of my part in these two plants?
What mechanism I would use to transfer the stock from supplying plant to the buying plant?
Your urgent reply is appreciated.
Thanks,

Hi Pream
You can do it through Intra Company STO, but in this scnerio the libility never gets generated to the receiving plant because it is transfer from one pocket to other. but you can always transfer the goods on the assessable valu. you have to maintain the ***. value in J1ID, then while bill system picks the same ***. value in UTXJ condition.
But if you want to salel at a margin then use SO-PO i.e. create PO from receiving plant and against sale order, do the delivery of the material to the respective plant.
I think this will help you.
In case of any qurty feel free to contact
Girish

Stock Transfer Between two plants within same company code

Hello,
We are using scenario-'Stock transfer between two plants within same company code. Scenaro is like Plant A is receving plant and Plant B is delivering Plant.
Plant A release PO for 100 nos to Plant B
Plant B issues 100 nos (via delivery) to Plant A
But Plant A receives only 50 nos physically so they do Goods receipt for 50 nos , but document got generated for 100 nos (when plant B issues material).
Now Plant A do not want to receive remaining 50 nos physically, but wants to reduce material document which got created when goods issue posted by plant B
Now stock in transis (mb5t) is 50 nos.
How to reduce this material document. or any another alternative solution for this?
Thanks,
Shailesh

Hi There
Reversal of partial is not possible ,
But you can use the Mov Type 557 and 558 to do the adjustments in Stock in transit qty
Few more details on STO adjustments
Hi There
it can be settle in many ways,,,
1. Receive the goods as 100 and Scrap the 50 nos from the received plant,,- If the receiving plant is responsible
2.Revert the PGI/Transfer movement(Vl09) and send the 50 nos again from the supplying plant- of the Supplying plant is responsible,
3.Also we have the movement type 557 and 558 without doing the above two steps you can correct the qty from stock in transit itself,,
4. also you can check the below similar thread
STO - material lost during tranfer from plant A to plant B
5. If above are not ok, then receive the goods as 100, And raise the STO as your plant as supplying plant and receiving plant is (Supplied 50 nos less) plant,, Do the process without sending the material.. in this way that 50 nos can be adjusted,,
6.Here is some more details
557 Issue from stock in transit (adjustment posting)
Only use this movement type (also the reversal movement type) under the following circumstances:
Using movement type 557, you can correct purchase-order-independent stock in transit if
- a good receipt cannot be posted to a purchase order without stock in transit, even though there is still stock in transit according to the purchase order history
- stock in transit still exists, even though there are no open stock transfer orders for the particular material
This movement type may ONLY be used in the cases mentioned above after careful analysis, to correct stock in transit that has rounding errors.
This movement type may not be copied.
Note!
Before using this movement type, note the following:
- 392205 Analysis stock in transit / Correction if split valuation
Possible special stock indicators:
E, Q
7. As previous post says if you have the note for this issue you can use that also
You can use any one of the way to solve the issue, Hope it helps
Cheers
Senthil P

Upgrade on SAP Plant Maintenance and Product Data Management

Hi Gurus,
I assigned to a upgrade project for Plant Maintenance and Product Data Managemet modules.
Please guide me what are the steps to follow and provide more information on this ...
Thanks in advance!!!!!!!!!
Regds,
RK

Hello Kurni,
In PDM/PLM latest version is PLM 7.0.
There are many new functionalities available in this version.
Earlier version can be accessed from SAP GUI, but the latest one can be accessed from Portal/NWBC.
DMS side many notes have to be applied as you will be instaling EHP4.0 as part of the upgrade.
ECM side some standard reports are missing in PLM 7.0, which were available in ECC6.0.
Regards
Prasad K

I have never dropped, sat on or did anything out of the normal use of my apple product but my product was in my pocket one day at school and it turned out to be bent is this a manufacting defect

I have never dropped, sat on or did anything out of the normal use of my apple product but my product was in my pocket one day at school and it turned out to be bent is this a manufacting defect?

I have two old ipod classics ( 6 and 7 years old), an ipod nano, the original iphone, iphone 3gs, iphone 4, iphone 4s and an iphone 5. All still work just fine.
You may be the exception.
Apple Tops Customer Satisfaction Again, Samsung Gains (AAPL)
Apple tops in customer satisfaction for 8th year | The Digital Home ...
Apple Tops Customer Satisfaction Again, Samsung Gains ...
Apple No. 1 in customer satisfaction for 8th year: report - MSNBC.com
Apple Still Reigns Supreme In Customer Satisfaction - TechnoBuffalo
Apple keeps top spot in customer satisfaction - Computerworld

Two plant but common product

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for