U201CRG23 Part II posting error
Hello Gurus,
1. My client is created one PO with 100 qty on dated 13/05/2010
2. And he has done the 1st GR (101) with 50 qty on dated 13/05/2010 and posted pat1 and II, when I opened GR doc in MIGO in that excise invoice number 1481 and date is 23/03/2010. And Part II (500811601) posting dated 14.05.2010
3. After that he has also done the 2nd GR (101) with remaining 50 qty on dated 27/05/2010 and posted part1and part II now in that excise invoice number is same (1481) but date is different 23/03/2010 and Part II posting (500811614) Dated 30/05/2010
4. Then he has done cancellation 1st GR (102) with 50 qty on dated 27/05/2010. And he has done the some of Vendor down payment.
Now all quantity is consumed and while doing MIRO for 2nd GR he is getting error u201CRG23 Part II posting yet not doneu201D u2013 Message no. 8I478
Hence i m suggested to client do is cancel both GR and part II also and again do GR fresh for all the qty which you had received then capture & post part II in J1IEX then post MIRO it will allow to post and MM ( Qty) & FI ( value) will be match.But he is saying all material is consumed and not able to do for cancel the GR.
Kindly provide the solution pls..
Regards
Rahul
Please follow the following procedure to avoid such kind of problems.
1) Whenever u want to cancel the Excise Invoice Number whose Part 1 & 2 has been posted.first cancel the Material Document so that u can reverse the PART 1 Entries.
2)Then repost the excise invoice so that PART 2 entries also gets nullified.
3) Then cancel the Excise invoice number so that its status becomes Cancelled from Posted.
After following the above procedure u should do the reentry of capturing/posting the Excise invoice.
If u have followed the step 1 & 2 ,but not the step 3 ,then the error comes in MIRO that RG23 PART2 posting not yet done.
This is the very common problem in Excise posting as people normally dont follow the Step 3.
Regards,
Satpal Mujawar
Similar Messages
-
During cancelation of MIRO document giving error message "RG23 Part II post
Dear guru's,
I am facing a tipical issue while i am going to reverse the MIRO document it is giving error "RG23 Part II posting not yet done" .
Senario is -- user has created MIGO with Myp103 and then 105, system promted excise tab and excise ref. and excise date is their .
But no Part1 generated.
So no part2 .
Now A/c has passed the bill and fi doc generated. Now we want revrse this bill (MIRO) and respectively MIGO (105/103 ) and again capture it with correct excise entry.
we want to understand, How this happned at 105 why part1 not generated and with out part2 how bill passed.
now waht can bo done to reverse this.
thanks in advance.
AjeetHello,
Please check the status of excise invoices if they are "In process" stage. Unless the status is "Posted" you will not be allowed to do MIRO. Further, select only those line items which belong to excise invoice.
Another possibillity of the error could be that the user must have changed the excise invoice date after it was referred in MIGO.
If so, to avoid such issues and to stop the users from doing the above, please review the notes : 1285986, 1346926, 1406505.
I hope this helps.
Thanks and regards,
Suresh. -
To have error msg for RG Part II posting
Dear All gurus,
presently in our system for invoice posting we have defined check for RG Part II posting as WARNING only. I want to hav it as ERROR msg. That is untill user has done Part II posting, system shud not save invoice. I checked system msgs in SPRO> MM>Log. Inv. Verification--> Def Attrbuted of System Msgs, but I cud not find that msg there. Can anyone guide me where can I change this msg to error msg.
Warning Message is as follows
RG23 Part II posting not yet done
I checked in OBA5
Message no. 8I478
Thanks
Edited by: sapsarang on Aug 7, 2009 2:02 PMHI,
U can do it thru
LG --> Tax on Goods Movement - India -- Tools -- Message Control .. here check 8I 478 is ava or not? if ava change the status into Error . if not ava, slect new entry and create for this msge nbr -
Error-RG23 Part-2 posting not yet done in MIRO
Hi Expert,
While doing MIRO, i am getting Error-RG23 Part 2 posting not yet done.
While analysis, i came to know that, user did 101 and then 102 and then J1IEX in 2014.
After that did new MIGO-101 in 2015 with same Excise Number-00917.
When i go to J1IEX and enter Vendor Excise Invoice-00917, it shows 2 Lines 2013-In Process and 2014-Posted.
So whether Error in MIRO is due to Excise Invoice for 2013
If yes what activity can be done for Excise Invoice for 2013What ever the case, If the Material document is canceled through MIGO then Excise invoice has to be Posted and Canceled in J1IEX provided Part 1 and Part2 were captured earlier for the Excise invoice.
Now in your case, Could you tell us whether you had posted Part 1 and Part 2 for the 101 Material document posted earlier in year 2013.
If you had posted Part 1 and Part 2 then you have to Post the Excise invoice and Cancel the same in J1IEX. If not, the status would be In process always.If you do not want to cancel the Excise invoice, you only have the following options.
1) Configure the message as a Warning Message for Certain user and ask the user to Post MIRO.
2) change the status of the excise invoice in J_1IEXCHDR, J_1IEXCDTL, J_1IGRXREF. -
RG 23 Part II posting not done
RG 23 Part II posting not done-this error is coming while doing MIRO.Pls solve.
P1175357 wrote:
RG 23 Part II posting not done-this error is coming while doing MIRO.Pls solve.
HI,
Can You elaborate your question?.
AND also once check the seetings in spro->img->Logistics - General->Tax on Goods Movements->India->Maintain Excise Groups
in that dont check the post ei in migo and save
after completion of migo
do j1iex for capture the value
after that do miro.
Thanking you. -
HI
We capture excise during MIGO and without posting part2 we try to do MIRO then the system should give error/warning
"part2 posting not done yet"
Where do we activate this ?
Thank YouHi Aditi,
No custom development is required. SAP provides a standard confugurable message 8I 478 which can be configured to be an error message for MIRO per user.
The message 8I 478 is a configurable message & it works under the condition that excise invoice has been captured but not posted,
............................................................it does NOT work when excise invoice is not captured....in situations like
only part 1 posted, or no excise entry made for a particular PO/GR.
Please use the user exit given in the note :
858772 > RG 23 Part II message not coming during MIRO
This note will allow you to write you own logic on when & what parameter the system should consider to get the message in MIRO.
Regards.. -
Dear Gurus,
plz help me
i have made GR with Part 1 post but iam not able to make Part2 post through Tr code J1IEX but the error is throughing " Cenvat Amount is not Reserved".
all tables updated except Part2 table is not updated.
Plz suggest waiting for ur valuable solution.
[email protected]
Regards
Ashokwhat are u doing? are you trying to reverse the part2?
In J1IEX you select the post by drag down and in second coloumn select either vendor excise invoice or internal excise invioce and press enter.........
Simulate the CENVET and post the document...........
Sachin -
Only RG23 A/C Part-2 Posting for free goods
Hi Gurus,
Hi Every one, how are you, i have one requirement from client.
1. this case is for free goods, where client wanted to take credit for material purchase ie only part-2 entry should get posted,
2. Liabilities should not get posted.
As per my understanding or solution given to client.
Both Part-2 & liabilities for vendor is getting posted,
can you please help me to resolve the issue.
full points will be awarded if found usefull.
Thanks & Regards
Manoj K SinghHi,
During Part II posting of Excise Duties for Capital Goods, Debit GL Accounts are determined via ETT CAPE and Credit GL Accounts are getting determined via ETT GRPO.
So check A/c determination for ETT CAPE and GRPO both in path SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Account Determination > Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction & SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Account Determination > Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction -
How to catch Posting error in File to IDoc Scenario?
I have successfully completed File to IDoc Scenario. Now I am interested in catching posting error. i.e., if mapping goes well and when IDoc is being sent to Recipient system then if any posting error is encountered, then a mail should go to a recipient.
Can anybody suggest the solution.
Regards,
Suraj KumarHi Suraj,
this can be done by triggerring an alert to the recipient.chk out these links to trigger a alert
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/01/14/alert-management--improving-monitoring-of-your-landscape
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/01/14/alert-management--improving-monitoring-of-your-landscape
regards
jithesh -
GR/IR Posting Error CKMLGRIR025 - Purchase Order History Inconsistent
Hi Everyone.
We currently have a posting in our GRIR for a Feright Condition Value against a Purchase Order which gets the above error when trying to post in MR11.
The Diagnosis of the error reads:
"The purchase order history contains differences between the goods receipt and invoice receipts/Account maintenance for the order item in the field Difference Quantitiy (= 43.804 TO) and Difference Value (= -342.77)
The purchase order history for this tiem is inconsistent"
When looking at this Freight Condition information in the Purchase Order I can not see why this item has resulted in this error in MR11.
Has anyone else seen this error come through in their system, and do you have any ideas on how to fix this.
Thanks
HayleyWe are experiencing the same issue with the GRIR Posting Error CKMLGRIR025 - puchase order history inconsistent. The actual message that we receive is Puchase Order history already inconsistent -->Quantity 1.00 EA Value 0.65-USD.
We reviewed SAP Note 708649 which also recommends using transaction MIRO with the corresponding default quantity and value o. However, we are not able to enter an Invoice for the "default qty & value 0", as SAP gives me error message M8278 "You are not allowed to have zero lines" (just like Haley commented). In reviewing this thread, I did not find the solution to the error message M8278 "You are not allowed to have zero lines" . Could someone help me understand?
Thank you! -
Hi SAP gurus,
I am facing posting error fi_tax_chk_pricing_data
error code 13 builder tax2.
plz help mehi
u get this error when u have not specified the county while creating the company code go to OX02 and give country for the company code. this solves your problem
rgds
sree -
MR11 GR/IR Posting Error - PO History Inconsistent - error message M8278
Dear experts,
We have the problem as described in SAP note 708649. Error CKMLGRIR025 - Purchase Order History Inconsistent
This has also been described in this thread
Re: GR/IR Posting Error CKMLGRIR025 - Purchase Order History Inconsistent
We also have the issue on posting an invoice "default qty & value 0" in MIRO, receiving error M8278 "You are not allowed to have zero lines".
However, so far we are not able to correct this eg do not know how to continue to clear the GR/IR
Any help or hints on this matter would be appreciatedHi,
please note that the error message M8 278 is only issued if there is
zero amount in ALL document lines.
This means that you can post MM-documents with zero lines. But only if
there are other lines with amount > 0. The reason for this system
behaviour is, that every time a MM-Invoice is posted, an FI-Document is
created. In FI-Documents it isn't allowed to have zero lines.
So if you have an MM-Document with only zero lines, the Fi-document
can't be created and the error message is issued.
I hope I could help you further
Best regards
Erika -
Miro posting error : RG23 posting not yet done.
Dear Experts,
IN GR DOES NOT CAPTURE EXCISE INVOICE, that means part 1 not done & in po also does not apply excise duty BUT AT THE TIME OF MIRO POSTING ASKS PART II POSTING NOT YET DONE.
PLEASE HELP.
THANKS,
Sachin.
Edited by: sachin shelke on Dec 6, 2008 6:48 AM
Edited by: sachin shelke on Dec 6, 2008 6:52 AMHi,
Ask the concerned taxation team to do the part II entry through J1IEX and then do the MIRO.
Regards -
guys,
i get this posting error when i try to create a purchase order.... please some one help on this??
tnx
wiz
Posting only possible in periods 2009/09 and 2009/08 in company code 2000
Message no. M7053
Diagnosis
The posting date entered is not within one of the permitted posting periods (current period/previous period).
This can be due to one of two reasons:
The correct current period has not been set in the system.
For the system, the first of the entered periods is the current period. At the beginning of a new period, your systems administrator must change the current period in the material master record, using the function "Shift periods". This has not yet been done.
You have entered a wrong date in the field "Posting date".
Procedure
Check the posting date and correct it if necessary. If your input is correct, inform your systems administrator that the "period shifting" (period-end closing) process has not yet been completed. Copied from M8022Hi,
The problem was due to posting period is not open for posting yet.
I believe you are trying to create PO for Oct 2009. But your posting period was open for Sept 2009 and Aug 2009.
Go to tcode MMRV to check for company code 2000, current period 09 2009, previous period 08 2009.
Go to tcode MMPV, enter the company code 2000, period 10 and fiscal year 2009, select "Check and close period" and execute.
Go to tcode MMRV to check again for company code 2000, current period should be 10 2009, previous period 09 2009.
You should be able to create a PO by now. If you still fail to do so, please contact your FI to open FI period via tcode OB52.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
JT -
General Ledger Posting Error (GLT2 051) No accounting transaction variant
Hello SAP Gurus-
When testing lockbox in FLB2, I received the following error message:
General Ledger Posting Error (GLT2 051) No accounting transaction variant assigned to FB01/ /LB
We are on ECC 6.0
I created a new Document Type LB
I created a new G/L account for Lockbox clearing and AR
How do I fix this?
Thank you!Hi,
Assign a transaction variant for the document type you created in Transaction code GSP_VZ3. Also, make sure that the GL accounts affected are assigned with item categories in GSP_LZ2.
Thanks
Aravind
Maybe you are looking for
-
I updated my iPhone 3GS with the new IO6 update last night and when it rebooted, my mobileme email account had been deleted along with all of my emails. I am unable to add the account again despite copying the settings on my ipad. There must be a way
-
Personalisation in InDesign 5.5
Hello, we would like to use personalisation in inDesign on Windows but there are some features missing that prevent us from diong so. For example, producing single files (1,000 pdfs from a csv file with 1,000 entries) that are all named using a colum
-
LaserJet M1212 nf - Error Msg: Used supplies in use
How can I stop my printer sending this message when I am using a non HP Toner? When this message is active I can not scan. This question was solved. View Solution.
-
Okay, here's something that I've never experienced before, and it happened after installing the 10.5.2 update. I can scan an image to the HP Photosmart Studio with no problem. However, when I hit "accept," and the final scan is saved to whatever imag
-
How to pass more that 3 items in Column Link
Hi, I need to pass 4 items as link values from page 1 to page 2 . Under Report Attributes-> Column Attributes -> Link I cannot set more than 3 items. Can some please advice the best method of passing more than 3 values from page 1 to page 2. Thanks i