UD without result recording

Can I skip the step of result recording and only I want usage decision for some purchsed items?
Is it mandatory to do result recording?
Thanks
SD

Please follow the following steps,
For the material for which . u dont want to do result recording and just do UD
1. When u assign inspection type to the material , just uncheck the follwing check box for inspection type
a) Inspection by Tasklist
b)Automatic Assignment
c) Check Char.
The advantage of this would be , that while doing UD u will not see any open characterstic  pending for ur input.
Thus RED / BLUE color info could be avaoided

Similar Messages

  • Preventing UD without results recording

    HI,
    We are able to do force closing of the inspection lots without results recording by registering the UD directly. How to prevent this? i.e. we dont want to register UD for lots without result recording for all the characterisitics. With User status we cannot achieve this because if we register results for some characteristics also the system status will be updated.
    Regards,
    Ravi Kumar C.

    hi
    yes as Mr.Shyamal mentioned, you can get through User status and in MIC slect the Required Characteristic radio button on control indicators,
    If you set this indicator, the inspection characteristic must be inspected.
    This means that you can only make a usage decision for the inspection lot after you have confirmed inspection results for this inspection characteristic.
    -pl check
    -ashok

  • Without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decesion

    Hi
    without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decision.I think it is possible through user status. Please tell the procedure .
    Thanks and regards,
    vairavan

    Dear vairavan,
    You can check for the authorisation object.I can't remember that authoriation object right now.But surely you can restrict that with authorisation object.
    Anyone knows the authoristaion object.
    Regards,
    Sunil Patil

  • QA32 Without results recording system should not allow UD

    Dear All,
    Here we have only incoming inspection. For that i have activate 01 insp type in material master and respective master data also maintained. My problem is Once GRN has done its has gone to QA32. From there first i am doing results recording and save it. After that i was not able to do UD. Then i have gone to INspection lot change the user stantus to INIT then only system will allow me to do UD.
    Any automatic setting is there to be achieve this one. Whenever i wil do results recording no need to chagne the profile status or anything then i will do UD.
    Could you pls help me to resolve this issue.

    If you used the standard SAP process described here:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20fbc091-ea3a-2b10-f0a3-877ffbf36436?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    You shouldn't have to do anything except make sure all the required characteristics have a status of 5.
    You shouldn't have to manually mark the inspection lot complete.
    FF

  • QA13..Inspection lot status should be UD without result

    Hello Guys,
    One of our client want report  to show for the inspection lot for which UD is done, And there is no results in the Result column in Transaction:QA13,Those records need to display in the report.
    But report was developed ,we are getting only the valuated once without result and ud is done.One more requirement is that non valuated once with UD,Without result should also display in the report.
    Normally logic is like this from table :QALS with ud we are passing to QAMR table..But we are not getting the non valuated once in this table.
    Can any one explain how we need to get the non valuated once in the report.Is there any table or Function Module where we can able to look into.
    Regards
    Kumar

    Dear Kumar,
    Without result recording has many interpretations. Suppose you have 2 MICs (LENGTH and WIDTH) in a particular lot and you have to enter 5 readings for each MIC. Letu2019s have a look on following cases.
    1.     Not a single reading is entered for any of the MICs.
    2.     Readings have been recorded for all samples for only 1 or partial MICs. (All the 5 readings for LENGTH are entered and no readings are entered for WIDTH)
    3.     Partial readings are recorded for all MICs. (2 readings for LENGTH and 3 readings for WIDTH are recorded)
    4.     All the readings have been entered but none of the MICs have been valuated up to status 5. (5 readings for LENGTH and WIDTH entered but you have not valuated / closed MIC)
    The logic for report changes based on above assumptions.
    1.     If you do not get data in QAMR table, it means result recording is not all done. Not for a single reading is entered.
    2.     QAMR is for getting the information about Results Record Status. i.e. whether MIC is set for processing or MIC is closed and valuated.
    3.     I think, you must explore QASE table also. QASE if for individual MIC readings.
    4.     Test the effect of result recording in both the tables for a particular inspection lot and develop logic accordingly. But the definition of NO RR should be finalized first.
    Regards,
    Anand Rao

  • Usage decision vs result recording.

    Hi All Guru,
    I am new in QM , was MM & PP support. I am confused here about the usage decision vs result recording.
    I do understand in QM there's inspection lot , in order to release the inspection lot , i should released the UD.
    So what's the different between this both ?
    Can i have inspection lot without result recording ?
    Or can i have inspection lot without UD ?
    Please help to clarify my confuse.
    Thank you

    Hi Crag ,
    Thanks for understand because i am totally new in QM.
    I won't use QM for Notification here. I will use QM for stock transfer & QM in Delivery before PGI.
    As i know the basic requirement of QM 
    Setup the Master Data (QM View & all QM relavant data) ---> Type of inspection (which will determine which type of inspection to carry out ) -----> Inspection Lot Configuration --->Configuration for UD ----> Configuration for COA.
    Master data that which required
    Material master QM view,
    Master inspection characteristics,
    Task lists or inspection plans
    Code, Code groups and Selected sets.
    Quality info-record
    My Question :
    By having the above setup and configuration , without result recording can i have the COA to print out for either Post Process Inspection (Final FG) or Inspection at Delivery ?
    With the Master Data which i mention as above , is it sufficient for me to activate
    Post Process Inspection (Final FG - QM PP)
    QM Inspection at Delivery (QM /SD)
    QM stock transfer with inspection type 08.
    Hope to hear from you.
    Thank you

  • Result Recording for inprocess lot

    Hello SAP gurus.
    For in process inspection lot i have 3 operation for testing my requirment is if i goning for result recording for second operation without result recording for first operation system should restrict me. we are using 100 inspection point for inprocess inspection please suggest how can we do this?
    Regards.

    Dear,
    Goto OPK4 -Select order type /Plant - Select 'Generally valid setting' for 'Operation sequence-Select 'Error when operation sequnce is not adhered  and also QM Error message if no inspection result exists.
    Or you can use the exit CONFPP05 PP order conf.: Customer specific enhancements when saving .
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Result Recording for In Process Inspection

    At the time of taking Usage Decision for In Process Inspection, system gives warning message if Results have not been recorded. Can this Warning message be changed to Error message so that user could not able to take UD without recording the results.
    Thanks in advance
    Srini

    Dear Srini
    1)Use status profile for restricting the user to do UD without doing RR. use this link for doing it
    Link: [https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20fbc091-ea3a-2b10-f0a3-877ffbf36436]
    2) you can use this auth object for doing the same restriction - Q_INSP_FIN
    Link: [Re: Preventing UD without results recording]
    Regards
    Gajesh

  • Status profile for Result recording & UD

    Hi
    I am using a status profile for restricting the UD (QM_L_004)without result recording. The stages are INIT and QFIN with the required settings.
    But users even after doing result recoding are getting an error while choosing the UD code. The error is Close Inspection - Complete. I have maintained this status on QFIN as ALLOWED and SET. I checked for authorisation (SU53) and found that it is giving for Object category QL1 for status profile ( QM_L_004).
    I request you all to please give me the details on this object category. Where it is linked & also should i extend the other object category QL2, QL3 and what will be its effects.
    we have issue of people not attaching MICs in inspection plan and giving only UD. I want to address this issue also
    Thanks In advance

    Dear,
    Suppose status no. for 1st one is 10 and for next one is 20. so for 1st one you put lowest and highest value 10 to 10. same way for secone one put 20 to 20.
    Now initially 10 is active now for second status put set when RR staus has acieved. In the same prohibit UD. Means select that button in which it does not allowed. This setting is only for status no. 10.
    Now setting for second status press set button wheen RR done. So it will get activated when RR done. Now in this select UD allowed radio button.
    Do this way, it will work.
    Regards,
    Kaushal Rai

  • Result Recording without release of physical sample

    Hi,
        SAP Gurus,
        I have one query regarding result recording for some lots.
       I have created one sample drawing procedure and assigned to inspection plan.
       In SDP I have maintained primary size factor 1, Fixed number 1, Acc.to smplng scheme-PM, Insp. severity-4.
       In pooled sample  size factor 1, Fixed number 1.
      At header level Consider No. of Containers Tick, Confirmation Required Tick, Used in Task List Tick.
    I have done One GR for raw material and assigned that inspection plan to the created 01 origin 01through QA02.
    One primary and pooled sample is created in CRTD status. I have not release the sample.
    When I go to QE11 for result recording system assigns the physical sample by default and branch me direatly to the result recording screen.
    My query is that, i have acivated confirmation required tick in SDP then system should not accept the sample which is in created status and should not allow me to do result recording. But system is skiping this and allowing me to do Result recording.
    Please let me know what necessary settings i have forgot.
    Thanks in advance,
    Harriesh

    Dear Shyamal,
                   The scenario i mapped is that, I need to release the sample manually. User should not go for RR without sample release.
    It is working fine also. But for few lots it is not asking the sample release. It ir skiping the sample status stage and directly going to RR.
    Please let me know way system is behaveing like this for few lots only.
    Thanks and regards.
    Harriesh.

  • No results Recording without UD

    Friends,
    My client requirement is that, there should not be any results recording without any usage decision in case of inspection activities of procured raw material ?
    Is there any setting available?  P. guide

    Hi,
    Refer this wonderful article. [http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20fbc091-ea3a-2b10-f0a3-877ffbf36436?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
    Regards,
    Anand

  • Result field greyed out in result recording

    Hi,
    In Inpspection plan of a material I have two operations.
    In QA11 (result recording), I am able to enter the results and save for the first operation.
    But for the second operation, the result field is greyed out. I can see the MICs there and I can even save the result but without entering anything in the result field.
    Why is this field greyed out?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Raghu

    It is an issue of key dates.
    Problem solved.

  • Time event C019 integration with results recording

    Hi ,
          Posted this in the QM forum and got no response so reposting it here.  I am asking for a discrete manufacturing scenario. Does any one know how to integrate CO19 time event confirmation with the results recording transaction. Usually on the mfg floor the mfg people will do in process inspection. They are used to more of a clock in clock out way of working. They clock into the operation, they do the manufacturing activities and then they do the inspection activities. Once both are done they clock out and the material moves to the next operation. I knoe we can tie in manufacturing confirmation (CO11N) transaction with the results recording for inspection points. But I am looking to tie in the CO19  time event transaction to do the clock in clock out and tie it with the inspection point results recording transaction. The operators on the floor do not want to go to mutliple transactions to record thier time on that operation. Do you know how that can be done and if its even possible ?
    Also do we have to use inspection points or can we do it without inspection points ?.
    Thanks

    GS, Time events are always tied to a record group technically and this prohibits free/extended usage of the transaction compared to say CO11N.
        Explore further on the details provided in the sap help site which states,
    'You can only confirm quantities when you confirm processing time events.
    You can only confirm activities that cannot be assigned to a particular record type group (Set-up,processing, teardown) by using the time event ‘Variable activity’. The confirmed value is assigned to corresponding value in the standard value key parameters'..

  • Inprocess Inspection & result recording

    Hi all,
    We are implementing QM.
    The requirement of client is to carry out inprocess inspection(preferable without inspection plan) including result recording & defect recording & that to with quiet ease.
    Help me with the basic settings.
    Also to have the relevant report to analyse the inspection activities.
    We are using developed T code for operation confirmation, in the back end it is co11n only. So also elaborate the consequences of the same if any.
    Mangesh

    Ramanuj/ Murali,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Let me explain the process in details.
    We are having around 10 operations.
    We need to carry out inprocess inspection for 8 operation starting from 3rd operation.
    The inspection to be carried out is like length- 5 cms, shape- ok or not ok, if not ok then what is the defect, assay- 90%, if below 90% then defective like this.
    I have assigned inspection type 03 in QM view in the material master.
    Inspection lot is also getting created.
    I am stuck up at result recording & defect recording.
    So kindly guide me how to map this in details.
    Efforts would be appreciated.
    SmanS

  • CRTD CHCR SPRQ-how to do result recording for that lot.

    Hi All,
    i am having issue.
    i did  GRN,lot is created with this status-CRTD CHCR SPRQ
    i tried for Result recording but  error is showing.
    Then came to know QP01 is not assigned for that material.
    then i created the QP01,but still i am not able to to Result Recording to that Lot.
    is any way to do that.without cancell the lot can we do.
    Regards,
    siddharth shanker

    Hi,
    Your lot is at created status so you need to relesed lot. May be insection plan /task list has not been assigned to lot.
    In Qa32 go in inspection lot Change ( Or T code -QA02 ) .where in tab Inspection specification tab click on task list/speci where you can assign plan theri ( You can assign plan with usage that you have created plan  )
    Save transaction.
    refresh QA32 then try result.
    Regards
    SANIL
    See QP02 with what usage you have cretaed plan.
    as earlier I told you in QA02 tasl inspec tab  in usage field select same usage by which you have created inspection plan.in QP01.
    Regars
    SANIL
    Edited by: Sanil Vadke on Mar 29, 2010 8:40 AM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Using Sun Web Server 6.1 from the IDE

    Using JSE 8 with Sun Web Server 6.1 set as the target container, I have a SUNWS61deployment.xml file created. That didn't exist in JSE 7. Is it WS 6.1 SP4 or SP5 -related ? I also have ws61-sun-web.xml with a simple <sun-web-app/> tag (empty deployme

  • 500 Internal Server Error while creating expense trip

    Hi, We have recently applied the following patches in the system: SAP ESS 600 SP13 SAP MSS 600 SP13 SAP PCUI_GP 600 SP13 Now we are getting the following 500 internal server error on clicking 'Save and Send' while creating Expences from the portal. T

  • Ibots

    Hi OBIEE Experts, I have few query's in OBIEE(10.1.3.4.1) version. I have install OBIEE (10.1.3.4.1) successfully in AIX server, I had configured SSO successfully in the same server. I have done scheduler configuration also then i am able to start ./

  • Fields "Completed" and "Completed Date" not available in Activity WSDL

    Hello All, We dont find the fields "Completed" and "Completed Date'" in Generic / Custom WSDL provided by OnDemand Any idea on the reasons? Any suggestions / workaround to query the above fields using Webservices? We tried guessing the integration ta

  • How does one increase Dreamweaver text of my reading material?

    How does one increase the Dreamweaver text size for it's instructions etc.?