Unrestricted quantity not reducing in MMBE

When we are reserving materials through maintenance order (IW31),
we can see the reserved quantity through MMBE.
but the unrestricted quantity remains the same and does not reduce.
This is not correct. If we are reserving a material in the maintenance
order, then its unrestricted quantity should reduce and the reserved
quantity should increase.
This is not happening in our current scenario.
For e.g
if there is a material A and it has unrestricted quantity as 2.
If i reserve 1 quantity through maintenance order.
Then its unrestricted quantity should reduce to 1 and reserved quantity should increase to 1.
but when we view the MMBE transaction, it shows quantity 2 in unrestricted and 1 in reserved.
Shouldn't the unrestricted quantity reduce to 1??
Please advise.

Hi,
I have done further investigation and found something further wrong with this.
E.g, Material A has unrestricted stock as 5.
I createa a reservation for 1 through maintenance order.
So, effectively, unrestricted stock = 4 and reserved  stock = 1 (total = 5)
But SAP (MMBE) is showing unrestricted stock = 5 an reserved stock = 1 (That means I have quantity 6 in total !!!!!!!!!! which is wrong)
Now, I do an unplanned goods withdrawal agains cost center for quantity 5. SAP lets me do it. Ideally, it should give me altleast a warning that quantity 1 is reserved.
Now when i do my planned goods issue for the maintenance order, it gives error 'deficit stock'.
This is wrong business process!! If i have reserved quantity 1, how can somebody else issue it??
Please advise,
Many thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Quantity not reducing in MD04

    Hi All,
    I had a purchase order of 1500. For that i did inbound delivery of 400. But quanity is still showing as 1500 for P.O in md04.
    What could be the possible reason for it?
    Regards,
    D.Dutta

    Hello,
    Run this SAP standered program in the SE38 transsaction.
    Prg - RM06CO20, first try in TEST run.
    If it is not run pls. check the 0 or O.
    thanks

  • WM-PP Production supply quantity is not reduce after Confirmation and GRN

    HI
       Iam configured the WM-PP,  Against production i did material staging, TR-TO Process and Grn . But the raw material stock is not
      reduced from the Storage type 100. kindly suggest me where i missed the configuration...
      with regards
       dinesh

    Hi experts,
    Please provide your expert comments

  • WM-production order supply quantity is not reduced after confirmation,GRN

    Dear Gurus
                   i am configured the WM-PP , in the production order after material staging and TR-TO process , i did confirmed the
                   production order and GRN.  Raw material stock is not reduced from the storage type 100.... 
                   kindly, suggest me where i missed the configuration.
    BR
    DEVA

    Hi Ismini,
    For the first question, there could be several reasons, like for example, 13.1 is not week 4. So if the consumption parameters did not allow forward for at least around 7-10 days (to get to the date of the first day in week 4), then consumtion didn't take place. Another reason could be that you defined planning strategy 10 for the material AFTER the sales order was already created.
    Point 2: I really don't know he details of these LTP scenarios that you mention.
    Point 3: if it really is from 2007 I think that you can delete the PIR without fear.
    Regards,
    Mario

  • Lot not show in MMBE quality insspection

    Dear expert
    i make planing for halb material  against 04 origin and also active inspection 04 or lot will be generated against 101 movement type. Now lot will be show on QA32 but not shown in MMBE in Quality inspection its quantity show only unrestricted stock.
    i want to show this quantity in quality for MMBE
    Because quality inspector take decision
    Please guide me
    Regards
    Priya
    Edited by: sapqm01 on Aug 26, 2010 12:57 PM

    Dear Vishal
    Thanks a lot. Now i understand thanks again and again
    regards
    priya sharma

  • Material availability check not consider the MMBE stock correctly

    Dear Experts,
    Thanks for your continuous support.
    I have one clarification ,at the time of process order raised COR1 - Click Material availability check after that massage had come in all material check available , but system wise some of the Bill of materials having not stock in MMBE ? What is the reason for the issue, with out stock material also given the status ok in ATP.
    At the time of confirmation i have put some loss qty , where is the way of display in loss qty after that confirmation.
    I need the report for one month process order confirmation list with order qty, confirm qty, delivered qty, &Loss qty ? Loss qty details only i am seeing kindly give the guidance if any t.code for display loss qty against the process order.
    Thanks,
    N.Umapathy

    Hi N.Umapathy,
    "Click Material availability check after that massage had come in all material check available , but system wise some of the Bill of materials having not stock in MMBE ? What is the reason for the issue, with out stock material also given the status ok in ATP."
    There can be an available quantity even if there is no stock in MMBE for that material.
    A simple example:
    Production order created with component X.
    Component X has a required quantity of 100.
    There is no stock in MMBE for material X.
    However, there is a planned receipt of stock (maybe in the form of a purchase document for example) of 100.
    In this case, it is possible that the availability check will confirm 100 is available even if it is not in MMBE.
    Another contributor on here, Jürgen L has written a very good blog on this here:
    Unrestricted use stock not equal to available stock
    Hope this helps.

  • Planned ind.requirement is not reduced during processing of the goods issue

    Hello to all,
    I am facing a problem.
    We are using make to stock production with strategy 10 (LSF).
    On 1.12.2006 the ind.requirement (LSF) is entered for week 4.2007 (I see that from schedule line history) for the material A.
    In the system at that time there were a sales order which needed that material A in exact quantity the LSF was. The GI of the delivery were on 13.01.2007.
    The LSF still exist in the system and it can be seen in MD04.
    Before running every MRP, a planning scenario is being created and run. From MS04 I can see that the LSF exists since then in all scenarios except from 3.
    The schedule line history of the LSF has only its creation (1.12.2006).
    Can you please explain to me the following:
    1. why in the first place the LSF did not reduce after the GI of delivery?
    2. the LSF does not exist in olny 3 scenarios. how it could disappear (delete) and appear (create) again without history displays that changes?
    3. If I delete the LSF I think I will not have a problem. Correct?
    Thank you in advance for your help.
    IX

    Hi Ismini,
    For the first question, there could be several reasons, like for example, 13.1 is not week 4. So if the consumption parameters did not allow forward for at least around 7-10 days (to get to the date of the first day in week 4), then consumtion didn't take place. Another reason could be that you defined planning strategy 10 for the material AFTER the sales order was already created.
    Point 2: I really don't know he details of these LTP scenarios that you mention.
    Point 3: if it really is from 2007 I think that you can delete the PIR without fear.
    Regards,
    Mario

  • I would like to know how to get the unrestricted quantity excluding actual customer ordr quantities on a given group of items?

    I would like to know how to get the unrestricted quantity excluding actual customer ordr quantities on a given group of items?

    Hi , Welcome to the HP Forums!
    It is a terrific place to find answers and tips!
    For you to have the best experience in the HP forum I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide.Learn How to Post and More I grasp you would like to replace the keyboard and would like the part number and where to purchase one. Here is a link to the HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC Maintenance and Service Guide .  Please note chapter 3, page 20, item 2 for the replacement keyboard part numbers. You stated you were having a difficulty locating where to purchase the part.  Here is a link to  HP Notebook PCs - Ordering HP Certified Replacement Parts for your convenience. You can also try a Google search with the part number for other vendors that may have one.   To say thanks for replying please click the thumbs up icon below. If this has addressed your query please choose solution provided to help other people locate this information.   Best of Luck!

  • Error while TO creation LT10 - Putaway quantity not zero

    Hi All,
    I am trying to create a Transfer order via LT10 (or via LQ02) where the available stock is available. The error log that I see says - "Putaway quantity not zero", Message no. L1605.
    The stock Scenarion is like below:
    Total stock                   15
    Avail.stock                   15
    Stock for put.                40
    Pick quantity                  0
    What I understand for any stock transfer to happen there should be Available Stock. Now I want to use this 15 qty for further processing by using transaction LT10 or may be LQ02. Why does standard SAP not allow this?
    If I do the stock transfer via LT01 for above scenario it does allow us to use the available stock.
    The error is coming from below code of program RLS10034
    *........Quants mit einzulagernden Mengen nicht markierbar!............
      if itab-einme ne 0.
        itab-ikone = sym_locked.
        itab-msgid = 'L1'.
        itab-msgno = '605'.
        itab-msgty = 'E'.
      endif.
    Pls advice why the check is there in place when it could have been avoided and how to remove this check?
    Thanks,
    Ravi Sabhachandani

    yes you are right there is a check and with standard SAP that is not possible you need to look for alternate method.Never came across this type of scenario in past however my suggestion is to have a look on the below function module and user exit that might be helpful
    L_TO_CREATE_POSTING_CHANGE
    MWMTOAU3 for posting change notices
    Even if you are able to mange this with some custom code I see a operation issue there
    LQ02 is help to the change the stock from one stock type to another (or quant characteristic) as per your test data if I will transfer the 15 pc from unrestricted to Quality and later on the transfer order of 40 get's confirmed (which is having the unrested stock) in the same  bin (this depend on the configuration of mixing) how the worker will come to know which is quality reject or which is unrested by looking physically
    Total stock                   15
    Avail.stock                   15
    Stock for put.                40
    Pick quantity                  0

  • LQ02 (RLLQ0200) Putaway quantity not zero

    Scenario:
    o Two KANBAN control cycles (WM Replenishment Strategy) for a material
    o u201CCombine posting changesu201D-set in the customizing (Stor. Location Control in Warehouse Mgmt)
    o Stock determination active / IM-311 mvtype used for WM-KANBAN-replenishement
    o Both KANBAN control cycles set to u201Cemptyu201D such that two transfer orders (dest stor. type 150 KANBAN) created
    o One of the transfer order is confirmed
    o Available material on stock is K consignment (special stock type)
    Problem
    It is not possible to execute the WM903/IM411K-posting via LQ02 if there are two transfer orders and only one of the transfer order is confirmed.
    Error message u201CPutaway quantity not zerou201D (status icon locked within LQ02)
    The system allows the WM903/IM411K-posting via LQ02 only after both transfer orders are confirmed.
    LQ01 is able to execute the posting change (related to the confirmed KANBAN TO) with IM-311-K mvtype. But I don`t want to have consignment stock in the IM-destination storage location therefore the WM903/IM411-K-posting needs to be done before the 311-IM-posting.
    Thank you in advance!

    yes you are right there is a check and with standard SAP that is not possible you need to look for alternate method.Never came across this type of scenario in past however my suggestion is to have a look on the below function module and user exit that might be helpful
    L_TO_CREATE_POSTING_CHANGE
    MWMTOAU3 for posting change notices
    Even if you are able to mange this with some custom code I see a operation issue there
    LQ02 is help to the change the stock from one stock type to another (or quant characteristic) as per your test data if I will transfer the 15 pc from unrestricted to Quality and later on the transfer order of 40 get's confirmed (which is having the unrested stock) in the same  bin (this depend on the configuration of mixing) how the worker will come to know which is quality reject or which is unrested by looking physically
    Total stock                   15
    Avail.stock                   15
    Stock for put.                40
    Pick quantity                  0

  • Srap quantity should reduce planned order quantity

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a scenario here and i wanted to know if this can be technically achieved .
    1.We have IDOC flowing from legacy system and it consists of both good quantities produced and scrap quantities produced .
    2.Good quantity produced must be reported as a reporting point confirmation. Scrap quantity produced must be reported as reporting point scrap.  Scrap quantity produced must also reduce the planned order planned order quantity.
    3.Function module currently calls BAPI 'BAPI_REPMANCONF1_CREATE_MTS’ to post good Pieces Produced, can the same BAPI be used to call the scrap quantity and reduce the planned order ?
    I have tried 'BAPI_PLANNEDORDER_CHANGE’ to achieve this scenario but still the planned order quantity is not getting reduced.
    I want to know the feasibility to achieve this in technical or functional side .
    Kindly help me to solve this problem , rewards would be generous enough for people who solve my problem.
    Regards,
    PKP

    Hi Santosh,
    Yes, it's true, it would simplify a lot. Unfortunately it can't be done.
    These are high-end, high value and small life-cycle components and some packaging materials. Packaging materials are relatively easy to stock for one week or more but the other components should only be stocked to a minimum level.
    Moreover, suppliers of high-end components do not feel the need to respect scheduled delivery dates because they "own" the market, so we can't be sure when stock will be available. The high demand for this components also adds more uncertainty because there might be only (unplanned) partial deliveries during the week as of production is available and distributed for us and other supplier's vendors.
    Oh, and a production lot can really be of as low as 40 units in some cases.
    Well anyway, I've tried the ATP approach but immediately run into a problem. In the morning I might be assembling a component (A) for the afternoon and I have a delivery scheduled for the morning of another component (B). I can't plan the afternoon production of a product with both components. Even being 2-3 days, in some very frequent cases we should immediately start production as soon as components arrive.
    So ATP isn't very adequate even in the shortest time-frame to plan production in this scenario.
    Thanks a lot for your input Santosh, it was worth a shot. Right now I can't see an option other than copy SAP_PP_009 to a new heuristic that reduces planned orders to component availability or to use a very small maximum lot size for these short production runs.
    Regards,
    Edgar

  • Quantity not updating in storage location

    Dear one and all,
    For a Sales order  and Delivery order , System has not reduced the entire qty from a storage location after making the invoice.  System reduced only part qty. The balance qty is still remaining in the storage location.
    Plz guide what all needs to be checked.
    Thanks & regards
    Sharad

    Dear GSL & Lakshmipati,
    Thanks for ur responses.
    One last question -
    I have an order wherein there are some physical items:
    - they are not value/text/service items
    - item cat/sch line cat automatically determined
    - sch line cat is relevant for deliv but not for MRP (no movement type defined) in customization
    - there Goods Movement Status is showing as complete (C)  in Delivery
    - there doc flow is showing as "confirmation of service"
    - all the items are completely delivered & invoiced
    - no batch split is occuring
    How will you keep track of such items (in storage loc.)? Why would you have such items?
    Thanks & regards
    Sharad

  • CATM transaction_System error: quantity not completely distributed

    Hello,
    When i execute the transcation CATM(entering of time), system was displaying the error in SM12/SM13 as "System error: quantity not completely distributed".
    but when i checked the accounts and the cost were transferred. so shall i repeat the transcation CATM again any?
    Question: while doing CATM transcation, why the error is displaying??
    Please be noted that i referred note 100690.
    Service PO is cretaed for 1 PC and service enetry sheet is created.
    The goods issue quantity (EKET-WAMNG) at schedule line level deviates from the quantity of goods received actually posted (according to the PO history).
    EKBE-quantity - 1PC
    EKET-WAMNG- 0 PC
    Process: MM and HR module was linked in the business process.
    In a Purcahse order , personnel number(HR module) need to maintain for our vendor. then service PO is cretaed and service enetry sheet is careted.
    Regards,
    Pabbati Obulesu

    Hi Pabbati Obulesu
    Have you already run the relevant correction report from note 100690? Was there any change to the table entries?
    Also check the consistency between the GR postings and the status of the SES.

  • HOw to restrict a quantity not to be transfered

    Hi Gurus,
    It is possible to restrict a quantity not to be transfered until its Result recording and UD is not completed. I have a scenario in which PO is generated using Movement type 103, Lot is created, but not cleared( Result recoding/UD not done). Now Store has transfered material using MIGO (Movement type 105) to some location.
    Idealy it should not be transfered untill unless its inspection lot is not cleared.

    Hi,
    You need to carry out the following steps:
    1. Remove the authorization of movement type 105 from store person's id.
    2. In the customization,  go to QM--> QI --> Inspection Lot completion --> define inventory posting, over here, confirm the the entry of movement type 105 for the VMENGE01 and GR blocked stock.
    3. So, whenever you carryout the usage decision and stock posting, material will be moved to un-restricted stock from usage decision only.
    Thanks
    SUMIT GUPTA

  • How to restrict the delivery quantity not more than target quantity?

    Dear Gurus,
    How to restrict the delivery quantity not more than target quantity in a scheduling agreement? I think there are 2 methods.
    1. I found that setting 0 in Overdelivery Tolerance Limit in Info Record is not effective. Why?
    2. I want to set E for the message but can't find the place. The message is generated when entering and saving quantity as delivery quantity that is larger than target quantity. How can I set E to a message (067, as I remember)
    Any other effective method? Please advice. Thanks.
    Regards,
    David

    Dear all,
    It is not OK after checking everywhere you mentioned. I tested in 2 clients. In the development enviroment client, it works whatever E or W. In test enviroment, it does not work (meassge is W).
    I think there must be somewhere besides of those you menetioned.
    I notes that SAP help for the overdelivery tollerance setting of scheduling agreement: 
    Overdelivery Tolerance Limit
    Percentage (based on the order quantity) up to which an overdelivery of this item will be accepted.
    Dependencies
    If you have set the indicator in the Partial delivery/Item field to 'D' (partial delivery allowed), this takes priority. It makes no sense to define a tolerance limit for overdelivery in such case.
    Where can I see: 'the indicator in the Partial delivery/Item field to 'D' (partial delivery allowed)'? I want to check it.
    Pls help! Thanks.
    Regards,
    David

Maybe you are looking for

  • Line item document flow shows net value of the item

    Line item document flow shows the value of the item with currency instead of the quantity. Any inputs on how this is getting displayed instead of the quantity being displayed? Additional information: In this case, the line item is a third party item

  • Regarding Java Mapping

    Hi, I am new to java mapping. I just want to know what files I have to upload in IMPORTED ARCHIVES in Integration Repository to run the mapping properly. Thanks In Advance. Yaseen.

  • Problem with Blur filters in effects browser

    Has anyone had a problem with the blur filters? Whenever I try to skim or apply any blur effect it freezes the viewer. Other effects are fine. Other functions of FCPX still work ok. The audio is ok, skimming works etc but the viewer is frozen. FCP th

  • I want to use jdbc to connect MS SQL SERVER

    hi, I want to use jdbc to connect MS SQL SERVER,not the jdbc-odbc bridge. I download the driver from MS,deploy it,but when I connect the database such as: <%Class.forName("com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver");%> <%String sConnStr="jdbc:micr

  • Metro ethernet configuration

    Months agao I had a 10MB metro ethernet link installed between two of my locations within 3 miles of each other. The link is fiber with a conversion module to copper, 10MB ethernet. I have the link on one end coming into a fastether port on a cisco 2