Quantity not reducing in MD04

Hi All,
I had a purchase order of 1500. For that i did inbound delivery of 400. But quanity is still showing as 1500 for P.O in md04.
What could be the possible reason for it?
Regards,
D.Dutta

Hello,
Run this SAP standered program in the SE38 transsaction.
Prg - RM06CO20, first try in TEST run.
If it is not run pls. check the 0 or O.
thanks

Similar Messages

  • Unrestricted quantity not reducing in MMBE

    When we are reserving materials through maintenance order (IW31),
    we can see the reserved quantity through MMBE.
    but the unrestricted quantity remains the same and does not reduce.
    This is not correct. If we are reserving a material in the maintenance
    order, then its unrestricted quantity should reduce and the reserved
    quantity should increase.
    This is not happening in our current scenario.
    For e.g
    if there is a material A and it has unrestricted quantity as 2.
    If i reserve 1 quantity through maintenance order.
    Then its unrestricted quantity should reduce to 1 and reserved quantity should increase to 1.
    but when we view the MMBE transaction, it shows quantity 2 in unrestricted and 1 in reserved.
    Shouldn't the unrestricted quantity reduce to 1??
    Please advise.

    Hi,
    I have done further investigation and found something further wrong with this.
    E.g, Material A has unrestricted stock as 5.
    I createa a reservation for 1 through maintenance order.
    So, effectively, unrestricted stock = 4 and reserved  stock = 1 (total = 5)
    But SAP (MMBE) is showing unrestricted stock = 5 an reserved stock = 1 (That means I have quantity 6 in total !!!!!!!!!! which is wrong)
    Now, I do an unplanned goods withdrawal agains cost center for quantity 5. SAP lets me do it. Ideally, it should give me altleast a warning that quantity 1 is reserved.
    Now when i do my planned goods issue for the maintenance order, it gives error 'deficit stock'.
    This is wrong business process!! If i have reserved quantity 1, how can somebody else issue it??
    Please advise,
    Many thanks.

  • WM-PP Production supply quantity is not reduce after Confirmation and GRN

    HI
       Iam configured the WM-PP,  Against production i did material staging, TR-TO Process and Grn . But the raw material stock is not
      reduced from the Storage type 100. kindly suggest me where i missed the configuration...
      with regards
       dinesh

    Hi experts,
    Please provide your expert comments

  • WM-production order supply quantity is not reduced after confirmation,GRN

    Dear Gurus
                   i am configured the WM-PP , in the production order after material staging and TR-TO process , i did confirmed the
                   production order and GRN.  Raw material stock is not reduced from the storage type 100.... 
                   kindly, suggest me where i missed the configuration.
    BR
    DEVA

    Hi Ismini,
    For the first question, there could be several reasons, like for example, 13.1 is not week 4. So if the consumption parameters did not allow forward for at least around 7-10 days (to get to the date of the first day in week 4), then consumtion didn't take place. Another reason could be that you defined planning strategy 10 for the material AFTER the sales order was already created.
    Point 2: I really don't know he details of these LTP scenarios that you mention.
    Point 3: if it really is from 2007 I think that you can delete the PIR without fear.
    Regards,
    Mario

  • Planned ind.requirement is not reduced during processing of the goods issue

    Hello to all,
    I am facing a problem.
    We are using make to stock production with strategy 10 (LSF).
    On 1.12.2006 the ind.requirement (LSF) is entered for week 4.2007 (I see that from schedule line history) for the material A.
    In the system at that time there were a sales order which needed that material A in exact quantity the LSF was. The GI of the delivery were on 13.01.2007.
    The LSF still exist in the system and it can be seen in MD04.
    Before running every MRP, a planning scenario is being created and run. From MS04 I can see that the LSF exists since then in all scenarios except from 3.
    The schedule line history of the LSF has only its creation (1.12.2006).
    Can you please explain to me the following:
    1. why in the first place the LSF did not reduce after the GI of delivery?
    2. the LSF does not exist in olny 3 scenarios. how it could disappear (delete) and appear (create) again without history displays that changes?
    3. If I delete the LSF I think I will not have a problem. Correct?
    Thank you in advance for your help.
    IX

    Hi Ismini,
    For the first question, there could be several reasons, like for example, 13.1 is not week 4. So if the consumption parameters did not allow forward for at least around 7-10 days (to get to the date of the first day in week 4), then consumtion didn't take place. Another reason could be that you defined planning strategy 10 for the material AFTER the sales order was already created.
    Point 2: I really don't know he details of these LTP scenarios that you mention.
    Point 3: if it really is from 2007 I think that you can delete the PIR without fear.
    Regards,
    Mario

  • LP type delivery not shown on MD04

    Why LP type delivery document is not visible on MD04 screen? and can we make it visible?

    Hi,
    Sure, that is why it is worth checking it is correct.
    A selection rule consists of certain MRP elements and stocks that are grouped together to a rule. Only the MRP elements that are selected in the selection rule are displayed, of the MRP elements that are displayed, only those flagged as relevant to availability in the selection rule are used to calculate the quantity available and the ranges of coverage. Only the stocks defined in the selection rule are used to calculate unrestricted-use stock, etc
    The display filter controls the display of the MRP list and the stock/requirements list. The system displays MRP elements only in the time period defined in the display filter. Within this period, the system displays MRP elements only for the segments selected in the display filterm so check your filter setting, deliveries could be excluded. This reduces the data in the list to a clear selection.
    Also, check that define MRP views has not been populated, this could affect user views.
    Thanks.

  • REM MFBF Scrap posting not reflecting in MD04

    Hi All,
    If I am doing yield posting from MFBF i can see reduced quantity in MD04.
    If I am doing scrap posting from MFBF quantity is not getting reduced from MD04.
    how can i achieve it via ABAP coding. pleae help with any exit or sample code.
    Thanks,
    Chinna

    Hello Chinna,
    Please refer below thread for your issue
    Scrap rate is set in bom but can't be consumed in REM
    I hope this information helpful to you
    Regards
    Umesh Mali
    Message was edited by: Caetano Almeida

  • Open orders should not update in MD04

    Hi, SD gurus,
    I have the below requirement,
    My business scenario is
    when  total open sales order quantity crosses a particular number(Ex:1000 Pcs) in a month, after that whatever the sales order we create it should not update in MD04.
    Our Business process,
    1. Creating a sales order
    2. Allocation run (here system will execute Credit check, availability check, and listing an Exclusion etc. here we need to enter sales order no, plant, allocation type)
    3. Creating a delivery
    4. Invoicing the customer
    Note:
    Usually when we de check MRP type and allocation in Scheduline category system should not update in MD04, but if we de check this as for our business process system should  not execute Allocation run
    Thanks in Advance
    Yuvaraj.

    Respected Lakshmipathiji,
    Thanks for your clarification but i have query here..
    ""if the users are ready to do this manually once a line item exceeds 1000 pcs a month, well and good""
    How users will check material wise?(suppose if sales order contains more than 100 line items and each line item will have its own requirement updates--will they do this material wise?)
    Is there any report which give the Status on Requirements for group of materials(MD04 status) in Standard SAP??
    Phanikumar

  • How can make PIR in period of adjustment not visible in MD04

    Dear guru ,
    I have defined a period of adjustment for planned independent requirements.
    These pir are visible in MD04 but they arenu2019t influent for mrp.
    I want to make these pir not visible in MD04 
    I donu2019t want to delete the pir because I want to maintain history of planned and withdrawn quantity.
    How can I do that ?
    Thanks is advance.

    Hi,
    A suggestion:
    Split the requirements into 2 lines (i.e. 2 versions), one line which is active, but does not contain the requirement which you do not want & the other which is not active & contains the reqmt which you do not want in MD04.
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • Srap quantity should reduce planned order quantity

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a scenario here and i wanted to know if this can be technically achieved .
    1.We have IDOC flowing from legacy system and it consists of both good quantities produced and scrap quantities produced .
    2.Good quantity produced must be reported as a reporting point confirmation. Scrap quantity produced must be reported as reporting point scrap.  Scrap quantity produced must also reduce the planned order planned order quantity.
    3.Function module currently calls BAPI 'BAPI_REPMANCONF1_CREATE_MTS’ to post good Pieces Produced, can the same BAPI be used to call the scrap quantity and reduce the planned order ?
    I have tried 'BAPI_PLANNEDORDER_CHANGE’ to achieve this scenario but still the planned order quantity is not getting reduced.
    I want to know the feasibility to achieve this in technical or functional side .
    Kindly help me to solve this problem , rewards would be generous enough for people who solve my problem.
    Regards,
    PKP

    Hi Santosh,
    Yes, it's true, it would simplify a lot. Unfortunately it can't be done.
    These are high-end, high value and small life-cycle components and some packaging materials. Packaging materials are relatively easy to stock for one week or more but the other components should only be stocked to a minimum level.
    Moreover, suppliers of high-end components do not feel the need to respect scheduled delivery dates because they "own" the market, so we can't be sure when stock will be available. The high demand for this components also adds more uncertainty because there might be only (unplanned) partial deliveries during the week as of production is available and distributed for us and other supplier's vendors.
    Oh, and a production lot can really be of as low as 40 units in some cases.
    Well anyway, I've tried the ATP approach but immediately run into a problem. In the morning I might be assembling a component (A) for the afternoon and I have a delivery scheduled for the morning of another component (B). I can't plan the afternoon production of a product with both components. Even being 2-3 days, in some very frequent cases we should immediately start production as soon as components arrive.
    So ATP isn't very adequate even in the shortest time-frame to plan production in this scenario.
    Thanks a lot for your input Santosh, it was worth a shot. Right now I can't see an option other than copy SAP_PP_009 to a new heuristic that reduces planned orders to component availability or to use a very small maximum lot size for these short production runs.
    Regards,
    Edgar

  • After delivery aslo PIR are not reduced

    Hi
    I am using strategy 10.normally in 10 strategy PIRS will be reduced after Delivery.
    after delivry also the PIRS are not reduced but  the stock is reduced.
    why it is happenning.
    plz give me the solution immediately.
    Regards
    Srinivas

    If I am right, you have done a PGI and still able to see the sale order/purchase order alive in MD04.
    If this is your problem area,
    Use SDRQCR21
    <b><u>Instructions for Using SDRQCR21</u></b>
    •<u>Material and Plant</u>
    If you enter selection criteria for "Material" or "Plant," the report processes the requirements according to this selection only. If you do not enter a selection criterion, the report processes all sales and delivery requirements.
    By severely restricting the selection criterion "Material," you may be able to reduce the runtime of the report. In general, selecting the "Plant" criterion only does not shorten the runtime period. For more information, see the section entitled "Performance of SDRQCR21".
    •<u>Data transfer</u>
    Select the "Data transfer" parameter so that the report updates the requirements on the database.
    If you execute the report without selecting the data transfer parameter, the report simulates the update only (that is, it checks the requirements and issues a log, but it does not make any changes). In this way you can also use SDRQCR21 as a pure check report for sales and delivery requirements.
    •<u>Compare</u>
    Always select the "Compare" parameter to improve the performance (runtime) and to restrict the scope of the log.
    The report then corrects, deletes and creates only the requirements affected by the correction. If you do not select the parameter, the report completely reconstructs the database (for the materials/plants selected).
    •<u>Planning entry</u>
    If you select the "Planning entry" parameter, the report creates planning file entries (entries for the planning run) for the materials/plants affected (and relevant according to the MRP type).
    •<u>Processing for material</u>
    If you select the "Processing for material" parameter, the report saves the requirements (database commit) one after the other for each material/plant, instead of saving all the requirements in one step. Correspondingly, the log issued by the report is also sorted according to material and plant.
    •<u>No parallel processing with a data transfer!</u>
    Only execute the SDRQCR21 report with a data transfer once you have made sure that no-one will process sales documents or deliveries (for the materials/plants according to the selection) whilst the report is running, either in the foreground (dialog) or in the background (rescheduling, collective run for creating deliveries, EDI-IDoc and so on)!
    Reason: The report does not read or set blocks. It therefore produces correct results only if no other program updates sales or delivery requirements, or checks availability while the report is running. If you execute the report with a data transfer during production operation, the system may even generate new requirement errors!
    Additional Information: If you run the SDRQCR21 report twice at the same time, enter the relevant selection criteria Material/Plant for the same reason, so that they do not overlap during simultaneous processing.
    •<u>     Recommendation</u>
    To execute the SDRQCR21 correction report easily, securely and completely, do not enter any selection criteria for "Material" or "Plant," select all four checkboxes and make sure that the report is not running during production operation. If runtime problems or other problems occur, see the following explanations in the sections entitled "Performance of SDRQCR21" and "Solving SDRQCR21 Problems."
    •     <u>Comments</u>
    o     Even if you execute the report without a data transfer, you should still select the "Compare" parameter.
    However, it is irrelevant whether you select the "Planning entry" parameter in this case, since the report without a data transfer does not create any planning file entries.
    o     The "Compare," "Planning entry" and "Processing for material" parameters are available as of R/3 Release 3.1I only.
    <u>Performance of SDRQCR21</u>
    The report may require a long runtime. Since you can only execute it at specific times (you cannot use parallel processing, that is, you cannot execute the report with a data transfer during normal production operation), bottlenecks may occur.
    In this case, attempt the following solutions:
    •     Execute the report with a data transfer only for materials with requirement errors. To do this, proceed as follows:
    o     <u><b>Step 1</b></u>: Execute the report without a data transfer and without the selection criteria 'Material/Plant', but with 'Compare' and with 'Processing for material'. You can also do this during production operation.
    o     <u><b>Step 2</b></u>: Outside production operation , execute the report with a data transfer only for those materials (or material/plant combinations) for which step 1 logged requirement errors.
    o     <u><b>Step 3</b></u>, only if you use total requirements (Table VBBS, daily/weekly requirement) and not individual requirements (Table VBBE):
    Outside of production operation , repeat step 1 without 'Processing for material' for test purposes. The report should no longer log any errors.
    o     <b><u>Comment 1</u></b>: If step 1 logged several materials with requirement errors, repeat it (several times if necessary) with selection(s) according to these materials. By repeating the step in this way, the system may log fewer materials with requirement errors. (During production operation, the report usually logs more requirement errors than actually exist. If data was transferred, the report would then create new errors.) Carry out step 2 only for those materials for which the report has logged permanent requirement errors.
    o     <u><b>Comment 2</b></u>: If the time outside production operation is insufficient for step 2, divide the step into several substeps. That is, divide the material list determined in step 1 into sections that do not overlap and execute the report for each corresponding subsection. You can execute these substeps in succession, if necessary over several days, or partially at the same time depending on your system capabilities.
    o     <b><u>Comment 3</u></b>: If, contrary to expectations, step 3 logs materials with requirement errors, (repeatedly) treat this step as step 1 of a new correction process. Outside production operation, reduce the list of materials with requirement errors as described in comment 1, and so on.
    •     Do not select the 'Planning entry' parameter.
    The report then does not create any new planning file entries (see above). However, you must be aware of the risks involved in doing this!
    •     Archive sales documents and deliveries.
    We recommend that you archive sales documents and deliveries. Document archiving reduces the database for the SDRQCR21 report and for other programs, and therefore significantly improves performance.
    •     Optimize database performance.
    The tables that the report uses to approximately preselect the relevant document items are the most important:
    o     VBUK and VBUP (without a selection according to Material/Plant)
    o     VAPMA, VLPMA and VBUP (with a selection according to Material/Plant)
               The report still reads entries from tables VBAK, VBAP, VBEP, LIKP, LIPS, as well as VBPA, VBUP and VBFA (if necessary).
    Finally, it reads and updates tables VBBE (requirement individual records) or VBBS (totals records for each day/week).
    Solving SDRQCR21 Problems
    •     Document status
    The report returns correct results only if the statuses of the documents affected are correct (with regard to reference, delivery, goods movement, reason for rejection). This prerequisite is usually met. Only if you have good reason to suspect that the statuses are inconsistent or that the report has returned incorrect results because of inconsistencies, see Note 207875 and/or 506510, to check and, if necessary, correct the statuses of sales documents and/or deliveries.
    •     Item Material Index
    If you enter the 'Material' or 'Plant' selection criteria, the report returns correct results only if the document items affected are contained correctly in the relevant material index (VAPMA, VLPMA). This prerequisite is usually met. Only if you have good reason to suspect that the index is inconsistent, that the report has returned incorrect results because of inconsistencies, or that the report terminated with SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC because of inconsistencies, check the TVIND Customizing table and see Note 128947 and/or 33267 for information about correctly reconstructing the material index.
    •     ATP server: After the run of SDRQCR21 (if you use the ATP server), you must load the requirements for the combinations from material and plant for which SDRQCR21 was started to the ATP server.

  • Quantity not updating in storage location

    Dear one and all,
    For a Sales order  and Delivery order , System has not reduced the entire qty from a storage location after making the invoice.  System reduced only part qty. The balance qty is still remaining in the storage location.
    Plz guide what all needs to be checked.
    Thanks & regards
    Sharad

    Dear GSL & Lakshmipati,
    Thanks for ur responses.
    One last question -
    I have an order wherein there are some physical items:
    - they are not value/text/service items
    - item cat/sch line cat automatically determined
    - sch line cat is relevant for deliv but not for MRP (no movement type defined) in customization
    - there Goods Movement Status is showing as complete (C)  in Delivery
    - there doc flow is showing as "confirmation of service"
    - all the items are completely delivered & invoiced
    - no batch split is occuring
    How will you keep track of such items (in storage loc.)? Why would you have such items?
    Thanks & regards
    Sharad

  • Sales orders not appearing in MD04

    Hi,
    Certain sales orders are not appearing in MD04. They belong to a particular sales organization. What could  be the reason and how to resolve such thing.
    regards
    sachin

    sachin arora wrote:>
    > Hi,
    >
    > Certain sales orders are not appearing in MD04. They belong to a particular sales organization. What could  be the reason and how to resolve such thing.
    >
    > regards
    >
    > sachin
    Hi Sachin,
    MD04 is the stock requirement listing.
    Normally it would not list general sales order that is Make to STOCK scenarion. It would not list those sales order as that requirment is taken care by PIR (planned independant Requirment).
    However in scenarios like MTO (Make to Order) or Plan to assemble to name a few. MD04 will list the sales order.
    For that you need to change the STRATEGY GROUP in Material Master to Planning with Asembly or Make to Order in MRP3 Tab.
    Once you save the sales order for such a material it will get listed in MD04.
    Hope it helps.
    Thanks & Regards
    Abhishek Swarup

  • Open PO item is not visible in MD04

    Dear Expert,
    We have one scenario that one PO contain 3 line item which having Open PO Qty. but for line item 20 we have completed open qty i.e.40 & PR is also there. but it is not showing in MD04 & Also not visible in MIGO while doing GR
    so please suggest what we need to do this will be visible.
    Regards,
    Ishwar

    Dear Subhash,
    Thanks for your reply
    Status of line item is OPEN
    Changes has been done in PO & also Version is set with Completed Indicator
    Plz suggest
    Regards,
    Ishwar

  • Sales order not shown in MD04 and product view

    Hi All,
    Sales order is created,but its not showing in MD04 and RRP3,The material type is X0.
    I checked the status of the sales order that is blocked for authorization,Is there any other reason for this.
    Regards,
    Prabhu

    Hi,
    In the sales order, please check the item category in the schedule lines.
    If the item category is CN, then you cannot see the requirements in MD04.
    The item category is determined from the MRP type set in the material master. Since it was ND earlier, the Item category  in the sales order became CN.
    Had the sales order been created after changing the MRP type, the Item category would have been CP and you can see the requirements in MD04.
    You can change the item category in the schedule line to CP and the requirements will be transferred to MD04.
    Once they are in MD04, they would automatically come to RRP3, provided the material exists in the active integration model.
    Regards,

Maybe you are looking for

  • Icloud storage for more backup

    I bought extra icloud backup storage with credit card, and apple already deducted my credit card meaning already charged money to my card, but i waited about half an hour already, still the storage plan not reflected to have the extra space i bought,

  • Unable to open Itunes in Windows 7

    Hello... I've got Itunes 9.2, and it will not open in Windows 7 64bit. I've tried removing & reinstalling it but still won't open, no error messages or anything. Any idea why it won't open and how to fix the issue? Thanks........ Glenn

  • ITunes 7.7.1.11 won't upgrade - no error

    When I launch iTunes, or click "Check for updates", I get the normal dialog saying, "A new version of iTunes (8.0.1) is available. Would you like to download it now?" I click the button that says "Download iTunes" and nothing happens. My iTunes softw

  • BW iview security

    Hi,      Requirement: When the portal user copies the URL of the BW report iview and pastes to a new browser after logging off, logon prompt should appear before the report is displayed.      What I did: Changed the Property Category - Load; Cache le

  • Consume a Web Service in ABAP

    Hi, We have a Web Service URL on PI. Run time of this Web Service in a Portal Server. We need to access the Same URL from ECC using ABAP Programming? Can any one tell me how we can call the same Web Service? I need to pass few values to the web servi