Unusable cause very slow automatic query

SQLdeveloper frequently freeze up for minutes in our development instances (EE 11.2.0.3), which have an huge amount of schema, objects and synonyms.
Freezing is due to following query, I suppose automatically issued in order to discover accessible objects:
/*+ NO_SQL_TRANSLATION */
SELECT 'SCHEMA' type, username owner, username object_name, null column_name, null column_id, null data_type
FROM all_users
WHERE rownum <=50 and username like :1 union all /*+ NO_SQL_TRANSLATION */
SELECT object_type type, owner, object_name, null column_name, null column_id, null data_type
FROM all_objects
WHERE object_type ='TABLE' and object_name not like 'BIN$%' and rownum <=50 and object_name like :2 union all /*+ NO_SQL_TRANSLATION */
SELECT object_type type, owner, object_name, null column_name, null column_id, null data_type
FROM all_objects
WHERE object_type ='VIEW' and object_name not like 'BIN$%' and rownum <=50 and object_name like :3 union all /*+ NO_SQL_TRANSLATION */
select 'TABLE' type, SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV','CURRENT_SCHEMA') owner, synonym_name object_name, null column_name, null column_id, null data_type
from all_synonyms
where synonym_name like :4 and rownum <=50 and owner in (SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV','CURRENT_SCHEMA') ,'PUBLIC')
The query is from a SQLDeveloper v. 3.2.09, but we had similar problems with older versions.
I tried ad-hoc profile with EM's sql tuning advisor, but the gain in minimal. Looking at execution plain seems like the major problem is the union with the all_synonyms views, actually slow by itself (a known issue with our architecture since Oracle DB 10.2.0.4, as far as I remember).
Are there any workarounds to avoid the query or any parameter to force it using instead "user_synonyms"? Synonyms of other users are rarely intresting in object tree panel, we gladly gladly renounce to them...

This forum is actually for SQL*Developer questions. Your qustion is about SQL and performance and should probably be posted in the SQL and PL/SQL forum.
You can verify if it is SQL*Developer issue (possible but unlikely) by running it in another evironment like SQL*PLUS.
However, since we are here anyway ...
I performed searches in Google, My Oracle Support, and the 11gR2 documentation for NO_SQL_TRANSLATION and found nothing of any use. Did you mean NO_QUERY_TRANSFORMATION? If the hint you are using does not exist it will be ignored and by itself cause no problems. If it does exist (unlikely because there are lists of undocumented hints to be found on the internet) it shoud probably not be used since nothing is known about it. Does anything happen if you remove it and run the query?
Post an execution plan of your SQL.
A visual scan of your query (hard because it was unformatted)0
1. lever SQL joined by unions. hard to read since the UNION operators were randomly placed in the SQL
2. Multiple queries against data dictionary. If not queried by keys reading data dictionary tables can be slow

Similar Messages

  • Zimbra login is very slow - SQL query takes 35+ seconds

    Hi,
    my Zimbra login process remains very slow, 35-40 seconds with only a single user using it. I have Beehive set up as directory synchronized, with about 6500 users in it. However, I and a couple of colleagues the only ones making any use of it for testing. With just one person logging in, the following SQL query takes about 35 seconds to execute:
    SELECT /*+ LEADING(rf rf_pp) USE_NL(rf_pp) INDEX_ASC(@rf_connect_by rf@rf_connect_by (ws_real_folders.parent_eid ws_real_folders.eid)) */ RF.ENTERPRISE_ID AS
    ENTERPRISE_ID, RF.SITE_ID AS SITE_ID, RF.ENTITY_TYPE AS ENTITY_TYPE, RF.EID AS EID, RF.LOCK_ID AS LOCK_ID, RF.CACHE_ID AS CACHE_ID, RF.CACHE_TS AS
    CACHE_TS, RF.CACHE_SQ AS CACHE_SQ, FLOOR(RF.SECURE_CHECK/10) AS ACCESS_TYPES, RF.PARENT_ENTITY_TYPE AS PARENT_ENTITY_TYPE, RF.PARENT_EID AS
    PARENT_EID, RF.NAME AS NAME, RF.OWNER_ENTITY_TYPE AS OWNER_ENTITY_TYPE, RF.OWNER_EID AS OWNER_EID, RF.CREATED_ON AS CREATED_ON,
    RF.CREATOR_ENTITY_TYPE AS CREATOR_ENTITY_TYPE, RF.CREATOR_EID AS CREATOR_EID, RF.MODIFIEDON AS MODIFIED_ON, RF.MODIFIED_BY_ENTITY_TYPE AS
    MODIFIED_BY_ENTITY_TYPE, RF.MODIFIED_BY_EID AS MODIFIED_BY_EID, RF.VISIBILITY AS VISIBILITY, CASE WHEN (BITAND(:B13 , :B12 ) = :B12 ) THEN CAST(MULTISET(
    SELECT METADATA_CEN
    FROM OCS_ENTITY_METADATA_CENS_2_V META
    WHERE META.ENTITY_EID = RF.EID ) AS OCS_COLLAB_ID_TBL_T) ELSE CAST(NULL AS OCS_COLLAB_ID_TBL_T) END AS METADATA_CENS, CASE WHEN
    RF_PP.LAST_ACCESSED IS NULL THEN 'N' WHEN RF.MODIFIEDON > RF_PP.LAST_ACCESSED THEN 'U' ELSE NVL(RF_PP.RELATIVE_STATUS, 'N') END AS CHANGE_STATUS,
    RF.PROPERTIES AS PROPERTIES_CLOB, RF_PP.PROPERTIES AS VIEWERPROPERTIES_CLOB, RF.DESCRIPTION AS DESCRIPTION
    FROM (
    SELECT /*+ QB_NAME(rf_connect_by) no_connect_by_cost_based */ RF.ENTERPRISE_ID ENTERPRISE_ID, :B4 SITE_ID, :B3 ENTITY_TYPE, RF.EID EID, RF.LOCK_ID LOCK_ID,
    RF.ORA_ROWSCN CACHE_ID, RF.CACHE_TS CACHE_TS, RF.CACHE_SQ CACHE_SQ, RF.PARENT_TYPE PARENT_ENTITY_TYPE, RF.PARENT_EID PARENT_EID, RF.NAME
    NAME, RF.OWNER_TYPE OWNER_ENTITY_TYPE, RF.OWNER_EID OWNER_EID, RF.CREATED_ON CREATED_ON, RF.CREATOR_TYPE CREATOR_ENTITY_TYPE,
    RF.CREATOR_EID CREATOR_EID, RF.MODIFIED_ON MODIFIEDON, RF.MODIFIED_BY_TYPE MODIFIED_BY_ENTITY_TYPE, RF.MODIFIED_BY_EID MODIFIED_BY_EID,
    RF.VISIBILITY VISIBILITY, RF.PROPERTIES PROPERTIES, RF.DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION, RF.IS_HIDDEN IS_HIDDEN, LEVEL LEVEL_NUM, COALESCE (
    (SELECT :B10 * 10 + 1
    FROM AC_ENTITIES AEI
    WHERE RF.EID = AEI.EID AND ( 1 = DECODE(AEI.SENSITIVITY_EID, :B9 , 1, 0) AND 1 = DECODE(AEI.OWNER_EID, :B8 , 1, 0) AND 1 = DECODE(AEI.AT_READ, :B7 , 1, 0) AND 1 =
    DECODE(AEI.AT_DISCOVER, :B6 , 1, 0) AND 1 = DECODE(AEI.LOCAL_ACL_ID, :B5 , 1, 0) ) ) ,
    (SELECT ACV.ACCESS_TYPES * 10 + ACV.IS_ALLOWED
    FROM AC_CHECK_ONE_OF_V ACV
    WHERE ACV.EID = RF.EID ) ) SECURE_CHECK
    FROM WS_REAL_FOLDERS RF
    WHERE RF.IS_HIDDEN = :B2 START WITH RF.PARENT_EID = :B1 CONNECT BY PRIOR RF.EID = RF.PARENT_EID ) RF, WS_RF_PRVT_PROPERTIES RF_PP
    WHERE RF.EID = RF_PP.EID (+) AND :B11 = RF_PP.VIEWER_EID (+) AND 1 = BITAND(RF.SECURE_CHECK, 1) ORDER BY RF.LEVEL_NUMIt has ID atrvjdrmz2v6d in Enterprise Manager, and I've tried tuning it with the SQL tuning advisor in EM. I did the statistics gathering mentioned in another thread yesterday, to see if that helped - doesn't seem liked it. I'm running Database 11.1.0.6 and Beehive 1.5.1 in the build from the day it released.
    Any hints? I'll post this to MetaLink as well, unless someone has some immediate idea what's wrong :-)

    No speedup, the 35-40 seconds is for normal logins - and it's very consistent, at least if the database is otherwise idle. Immediately logging out and back in gives me the same wait, and the same query shows up in the Enterprise Manager interface.
    It seems it might be related to Workspaces - from EM:
    "PL/SQL Source (Line Number)          BEE_CODE.WS_REAL_FOLDER_PKG (2998)"

  • Very Slow SQL query - Fast in SSMS

    We have a very simple query that executes instantly in SSMS, returning about 45,000 rows.  Whenever I run the same query on a CFM page it takes about 47 seconds to execute.
    I've tried reindexing, turning it into a stored procedure, etc.. but nothing seems to help.   My other queries are also running a little slower, but not nearly as noticeable because they are smaller queries.
    I have an additional CF10 server that seems to run the query perfectly fine on a test page.
    The query is pretty much this:
    Select X,Y,Z
    FROM TABLE
    WHERE BLAH BLAH BLAH
    Can someone offer me some advice on what can cause this or how to find the issue?
    Thanks!

    Just an update.  It ended up being "something" to do with the CF machine, although still not sure what exactly.
    Ended up solving the issue by installing CF on identical hardware and patching to the same windows and CF versions.   The site is now running like a champ and loading pages in less than 1 second.
    Steve, I have a dynamic filter that I run a query of query on the 45k rows to generate.  Once the first option is selected, it takes the distinct rows from the original query were x = selection and there can be 10-12 sub options to narrow down inside of that data.  It seems to load much faster this way than by returning to SQL server each time a response is selected.
    Thanks for your suggestions.  Hopefully we don't have the issue again... whatever it was.

  • SSRS report running very slow but query is very fast in SSMS

    I am running a very basic report. I am just retrieving some data from a table and I am using a parameter in the Where clause of the query. The query runs fast (in less than 5 secs) if I hardcode the parameter in the SSRS query but if it's left as a dynamically
    chosen parameter the query takes over 5 minutes to render. I have read a little about "Parameter Sniffing" but I am not sure if that applies to my case since I am only using a TSQL query and not a SP.
    Any feedback would be appreciated.
    PS: My query looks like below:
    Select Col1, Count(*)
    From Tbl1
    Where Col2 = @Para1
    Group By Col1
    KK

    Hi Kk,
    Is your data retrieval takes time or report rendering takes time? Run this query in your report server database to get the above two. Select * From Executionlog2
    Check the timings data retrieval time, processing time, and report rendering time.
    If data retrieval takes time,
    Give some default values to filters (parameters).
    If parameter rendering takes time
    Choose different options for parameter selection. Instead of multiselction of parameter, use like etc.
    Let me know which causing this problem after running the SQL profiler or executionlog query so that I can help you more. Or you can use SQL profiler to check what query takes more time.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Creating text boxes is causing VERY slow performance

    i've read the threads about how slow indesign cc has been from last year.  i would assume this issue had been fixed by now, so i just switched our
    whole company over from cs5 to cc.  we are a prinitng company that makes calendars with many text boxes, and indesign cc is about 1/2 as fast
    as cs5 was in creating these from scratch.  i've noticed the more text boxes, whether used or blank, causes it to slow even more.  i can't do anything
    without it lagging and pausing, which is not productive whatsoever.
    is there any fix at all to this or is this ever going to be fixed?  i have found no solution. 
    we have 32 gb ram and decently fast macs (not the newest but decent), but processing speed can't be the issue when it seems everyone is having these same problems.  (we do not have retina dislplays, just normal samsung monitors)
    we have tried saving new files out as the new cc version but that doesn't help.
    try it for yourself.  make an 8 1/2 X 11 document with 100 step and repeated text boxes.  even left blank, the whole programs slows down.
    i need help, or else i have no choice but to roll everyone back to cs5.

    You did receive the file.  You already replied to me about the issue.  See below.
    Since I have last spoken with you I did download os 10.7.5, and I will work with it today to see if it's any faster.  Unfortunately as I predicted it  "broke" 2 of our other powerpc applications that I absolutely have to have, so that's a whole other set of issues that this has caused me.
    I will let you know if I still have the same performance issues.  This is the last thing I can try because I cannot upgrade this mac to 10.8.  If the performance isn't better I guess I'll just be forced to go back to CS5.
    Chris Smith
    Drum-Line Graphics Dept. Manager
    800-284-2456 Ext. 133
    Hi Chris,
    We are officially NOT supporting 10.6.8. The official supported platforms of Mac are 10.7 onwards.
    I too would recommend that you upgrade as we haven't performed much testing on 10.6.8. It currently works but the outcome may not be nice as you are already facing.
    Maybe you can try upgrading to 10.7 or 10.8, your mac may support these platforms and so does InDesign.
    Thanks
    Javed

  • Very slow select query-

    Hi Guys,
    First of all apologies for the long post…
    I have written a query to fetch some data but it’s really slow…
    SELECT di.doc_no       doc_no,
           di.doc_class    doc_class,
           di.doc_sheet    doc_sheet,
           di.doc_rev      doc_rev
    FROM  dia_table di, pi_table pi
    WHERE pi.user_id = 'alain'
    AND   (1 IN (SELECT 1
                 FROM   spg_table s, ur_table r
                 WHERE  r.identity     = pi.user_id
                 AND    r.role         = s.role
                 AND    s.privilege_id = 'ADMINISTRATOR' )
    OR ( (di.edit_access = 1 OR di.view_access = 1) AND  di.person_id = pi.person_id )
    OR ( (di.edit_access = 1 OR di.view_access = 1) AND (di.person_id   = '*') )
    OR ( (di.edit_access = 1 OR di.view_access = 1) AND (di.group_id IS NOT NULL)
          AND
         (1 IN   (SELECT 1 
                  FROM   dgm_table  
                  WHERE  group_id = di.group_id 
                  AND  ( person_id = pi.person_id OR person_id = '*' ) ) )
         )This will take more than 3 hours to run…
    dia_table - 1400000 records
    pi_table - 2500 records
    spg_table - 20 records
    ur_table - 12000 records
    dgm_table - 1500 records
    Can you please advice on what kind of modifications that I could do to improve the above query…
    To get an idea I have the following results also…
    1.
    SELECT count(*)
    FROM  dia_table di, pi_table pi
    WHERE di.doc_no LIKE '10012%';
    If I run the above query (with out the where clause and with a extra condition to reduce the time to execute the query) it will return 481381 records within 4 seconds.
    2.
    SELECT count(*)
    FROM  dia_table di, pi_table pi
    WHERE pi.user_id = 'alain'
    AND   (1 IN (SELECT 1
                 FROM   spg_table s, ur_table r
                 WHERE  r.identity     = pi.user_id
                 AND    r.role         = s.role
                 AND    s.privilege_id = 'ADMINISTRATOR' )
    OR ( (di.edit_access = 1 OR di.view_access = 1) AND  di.person_id = pi.person_id )
    OR ( (di.edit_access = 1 OR di.view_access = 1) AND (di.person_id   = '*') )
    OR ( (di.edit_access = 1 OR di.view_access = 1) AND (di.group_id IS NOT NULL) )
    AND di.doc_no LIKE '10012%';
    This will return 241999 records within135 seconds. (Without the final AND clause)
    3.
    SELECT count(*)
    FROM  dia_table di, pi_table pi
    WHERE pi.user_id = 'alain'
    AND   (1 IN (SELECT 1
                 FROM   spg_table s, ur_table r
                 WHERE  r.identity     = pi.user_id
                 AND    r.role         = s.role
                 AND    s.privilege_id = 'ADMINISTRATOR' )
    OR ( (di.edit_access = 1 OR di.view_access = 1) AND  di.person_id = pi.person_id )
    OR ( (di.edit_access = 1 OR di.view_access = 1) AND (di.person_id   = '*') )
    OR ( (di.edit_access = 1 OR di.view_access = 1) AND (di.group_id IS NOT NULL)
          AND
         (1 IN   (SELECT 1 
                  FROM   dgm_table  
                  WHERE  group_id = di.group_id 
                  AND  ( person_id = pi.person_id OR person_id = '*' ) ) )
    AND di.doc_no LIKE '10012%';
    This will return 32299 records in 461 seconds. The extra condition (AND di.doc_no LIKE '10012%') was used to reduce the overall time taken so that I could see the execution times more quickly.I really appreciate any help/comments/advices you guys can provide…

    Hi... hope this will be a help to provide a suggestion…
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 2456893396
    | Id  | Operation                      | Name                      | Rows  | Byt
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |                           |  1332K|
    |   1 |  CONCATENATION                 |                           |       |
    |*  2 |   FILTER                       |                           |       |
    |   3 |    MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN        |                           |   517 | 284
    |*  4 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DIA_TABLE                 |     1 |
    |*  5 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | DIA_PK                    |     1 |
    |   6 |     BUFFER SORT                |                           |  2393 | 263
    |   7 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL         | PI_TABLE                  |  2393 | 263
    |   8 |    INLIST ITERATOR             |                           |       |
    |*  9 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | DGM_PK                    |     1 |
    |* 10 |   FILTER                       |                           |       |
    |  11 |    MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN        |                           |   897 | 493
    |* 12 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL          | DIA_TABLE                 |     1 |
    |  13 |     BUFFER SORT                |                           |  2393 | 263
    |  14 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL         | PI_TABLE                  |  2393 | 263
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    |  15 |    INLIST ITERATOR             |                           |       |
    |* 16 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | DGM_PK                    |     1 |
    |* 17 |   FILTER                       |                           |       |
    |* 18 |    HASH JOIN                   |                           | 46630 |  25
    |  19 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL          | PI_TABLE                  |  2393 | 263
    |* 20 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL          | DIA_TABLE                 |   139K|  60
    |  21 |    INLIST ITERATOR             |                           |       |
    |* 22 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | DGM_PK                    |     1 |
    |* 23 |   FILTER                       |                           |       |
    |  24 |    NESTED LOOPS                |                           | 64224 |  34
    |  25 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| PI_TAB                    |     1 |
    |* 26 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | USER_ID_UX                |     1 |
    |  27 |       NESTED LOOPS             |                           |     1 |
    |* 28 |        INDEX FULL SCAN         | SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE_GRANT_PK |     1 |
    |* 29 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN       | FND_USER_ROLE_RUNTIME_PK  |     1 |
    |* 30 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL          | DIA_TABLE                 |  1284K|
    |  31 |    INLIST ITERATOR             |                           |       |
    |* 32 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | DGM_PK                    |     1 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Edited by: Napster on Oct 20, 2009 1:13 AM

  • Urgent: WAD performance is very slow than query performance

    Hi,
       If i execute the report(using query with variables) which contains 8,50,000 records in WAD then its taking more than 900 seconds and say Connection timed out at the end.
      If i execute the same query in Query designer using Web browser then it will take 400 seconds to show all the data in hierarchy or tabular view.
      I've done tuning using RSRT on query read mode and persistent mode etc..
      Can you please help me?
    THanks in advance. Points will be given...
    Reg,
      Varun

    Varun,
    Did you ever solve the performance issue of WAD report.  We are having the same issue of WAD performance lot slower than executing just as a Query.
    Thanks

  • BSIS performance is very Slow in query

    Dear All,
    How to increase performance for the following query BSIS
    select    a~saknr as glcode
                b~txt50 as gldesc
                into corresponding fields of table it_final
                from skb1 as a
                inner join skat as b
                on asaknr = bsaknr
                where a~saknr in p_glcode
                and   a~bukrs eq company
                and   b~spras eq 'EN'
                and   b~ktopl eq 'ABIX'.
      sort it_gl by saknr.
    the above query get 220 G/L accounts.*
      if not it_final[] is initial.
        select
             bukrs
             hkont
             augdt
             augbl
             zuonr
             gjahr
             belnr
             buzei
             budat
             werks
             kostl
             aufnr
             shkzg
             dmbtr
             prctr
             into corresponding fields of table it_bseg
             from bsis
             for all entries in it_final
             where bukrs eq company
             and   prctr eq s_prctr
             and   gjahr eq s_year                                                     
             and   hkont eq it_final-glcode
             and   budat in s_budat                    "BETWEEN fromdt AND todt .
    *above query taken above 30 minutes in production.
    give me suggestions to tune query .
    Regards,
    Moon
    Edited by: GoldMoon on Jan 13, 2010 4:35 PM

    Hi GoldMoon,
    (1)
    Refer to your last posting, seems that you've created index which wouldn't help your query performance.
    You need to create index from the field which supplied from your 'WHERE' condition. So if I follow your initial posting in this thread, your index should contains:
    - BUKRS (which will be compared with your company variable)
    - PRCTR (which will be compared with your s_prctr variable)
    - GJAHR (which will be compared with your s_year variable)
    - HKONT (which will be compared with your glcode value in your it_final[])
    - BUDAT (which will be compared with your s_budat range/select option.
    And to follow the BSIS field order, the above index field need to be arranged as follow
    - BUKRS
    - HKONT
    - GJAHR
    - BUDAT
    - PRCTR
    (2).
    Try not to use 'INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS' as it will increase table-memory overhead, but use 'INTO' and make sure the field list and internal table fields is in the same order.
    So, once the index has been created, and 'INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS' has been changed to 'INTO' your selection should looks like this:
    IF NOT it_final[] IS INITIAL.
    SELECT bukrs
              hkont
              augdt
              augbl
              zuonr
              gjahr
              belnr
              buzei
              budat
              werks
              kostl
              aufnr
              shkzg
              dmbtr
              prctr
        FROM bsis
         INTO TABLE it_bseg
          FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_final
    WHERE bukrs eq company
        AND hkont eq it_final-glcode
        AND gjahr eq s_year
        AND budat in s_budat
        AND prctr eq s_prctr.
    ENDIF.
    Hope it helps

  • Urgent: WAD performance is very slow than query level execution

    Hi,
    If i execute the report(using query with variables) which contains 8,50,000 records in WAD then its taking more than 900 seconds and say Connection timed out at the end.
    If i execute the same query in Query designer using Web browser then it will take 400 seconds to show all the data in hierarchy or tabular view.
    I've done tuning using RSRT on query read mode and persistent mode etc..
    Can you please help me?
    THanks in advance. Points will be given...
    Reg,
    Varun

    Please advice...
    or
    Send some usefule links.
    Regards,
      Varun

  • What is causing very slow outgoing mail on new iphone 5?

    Hi, I just got the new iphone 5 and set up mail with the auto options that the iphone gives me. It's for Gmail and yahoo. I can receive just fine on both, but both have issues sending. It will take 5-10 mins to send an email. I've done everything I've read that is supposed to fix it... delete accounts, set up again, shut down phone, restart, etc, etc. I've scoured the interwebs and can't find a solution. 
    If I set up gmail through the microsoft exchange, it works, but why won't it work through the pre-set up gmail account? Any ideas? Is it something to do with the SMTP?  HELP!
    Thanks...

    Another way to continue using assistive touch and reducing the lag completely is to go to Settings>General>Assistance>Increase contrast>On
    This solved it for me but I am hoping its just a part time fix as I enjoy the translucent visuals. Increase contrast basically takes away the layering found across the OS. My lock button is broken so I am forced to use assistive touch and this is really the only thing I can do rightnow. Try it out it should work well for you if you're willing to make a small sacrifice.
    However, Apple should adress this issue as the iPhone 5 should be able to handle this kind of load from the OS without any issues especially considering that the 5C, which comes preloaded with iOS7 has the same internal hardware.
    Hope this helps you, for the time being until Apple, hopefully, fixes this issue.

  • Aperture suddenly becomes very slow opening library

    Hi.
    I've got only 100 or so photos, and Aperture suddenly becomes very slow, it take a couple of minutes now to open the library.
    Just before this started to happen, I got a very short massage, saying something like, "It's repairing some files."
    I wonder if there are some corrupt files there, causing very slow opening the program.
    Is there any way to check this and fix this problem?
    I'm using 3.4.3, and OS 10.8.3.
    I appreciate your help.
    Hiro

    I'm surprised nobody has responded to this yet. Hopefully you have already figured it out, but if you double click on the aperture library while holding down the option and command keys, Aperture will bring up a dialog that gives you three options for dealing with potential library issues: repair permissions, repair the library or rebuild the library. You should try them in that order, and it is a good idea to back up your library first (especially before rebuilding the library).
    Hope this helps.

  • 10g Form - first execute query - very slow

    I have the following issue:
    Enter an application
    open a form in enter query mode
    first time execute query is very slow (several minutes)
    every other time it's quick (couple seconds or less)
    I can leave the form, use other forms within the app, come back and query is still quick. It's only the first time after initially launching the app.
    Any ideas what might be causing this?

    We have the same application running in 6i client/server DB-9i in production. We are testing the upgraded application that is 10g forms on OAS DB-10g. We don't have the issue in the current production client/server app.

  • DISTINCT cause slowness in query

    hi ,
    I am using Oracle 9i
    I have a query that returns abt 200k record in 2 mins w/o running the DISTINCT clause
    SELECT  DISTINCT * FROM (
    SELECT A.ID ,
                    A.NAME
                    A.STG
                    A.NUM
                    A.CNT,
                    C.FLG
      FROM RS_TBL A,
           (SELECT DISTINCT T.ID
               FROM HST1 T
              WHERE (T.TIMESTAMP >= TRUNC(SYSDATE, 'HH') OR
                    T.TIMESTAMP >= TRUNC(SYSDATE, 'HH') - 1)
               AND T.ID IS NOT NULL) B,
           SOURCE.PRD C
    WHERE A.ID = B.ID
       AND B.ID = C.ID
    )however, when i put in the distinct , it became very slow , waited for abt 30 mins and results not returned
    anyway for me to fine tune it ?
    pls advise

    hi ,
    i have rewrite the query
    SELECT BB.* FROM (
    SELECT DISTINCT  A.ID
                    A.NAME
                    A.STG
                    A.NUM
                    A.CNT,
                    C.FLG
      FROM RS_TBLA , SOURCE.PRD C
       WHERE A.ID = C.ID) BB
    WHERE EXISTS (
           SELECT 'X'
               FROM HST1 T
              WHERE (T.TIMESTAMP >= TRUNC(SYSDATE, 'HH') OR
                    T.TIMESTAMP >= TRUNC(SYSDATE, 'HH') - 1)
               AND T.ID IS NOT NULL
               AND BB.ID = T.ID)and it has indeed become faster , got the full results under 4 mins
    but i really dun understand if EXISTS is the cause that made it faster here ?
    i would thought that a normal join like select a.* from a , b , c
    where a.id = b.id and b.id = c.id will in fact be the "fastest"
    i am a bit confused abt when to really use a normal join , an EXISTS or IN as sometimes those that are supposedly "slower" for example IN clause (because each record in main table will cause the same sql to be executed) actually works better
    pls advise

  • Oracle query / view performing very slow.

    Hello,
    I had created a view in my application for example
    CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW EmpTransfer
    ( EMPID,EMPNAME,EMPMANAGER,EMPDOB,EMPTRANSFER)
    AS
    SELECT EMPID,EMPNAME,EMPMANAGER,EMPDOB,EMPTRANSFER
    FROM EMP ;
    After couple of months if we changed a columnname in the table EMP and added a new column.
    We changed column name EMPTRANSFER to OldEMPTRANSFER and added a new column as NEWEMPTRANSFER.
    The indexes were recreated on OldEMPTRANSFER and new index is creatd on NEWEMPTRANSFER column.
    the view is again recreated.
    CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW EmpTransfer
    ( EMPID,EMPNAME,EMPMANAGER,EMPDOB,OldEMPTRANSFER,NEWEMPTRANSFER )
    AS
    SELECT EMPID,EMPNAME,EMPMANAGER,EMPDOB,OldEMPTRANSFER ,NEWEMPTRANSFER
    FROM EMP ;
    This view is working as expected but some times this view is working very slow.
    The performance of this view is randomly slow.
    Is it possible that column name change will cause slowness...?

    What's the explain plans for both before and after the column change? It could possibly be running slow the first time because of a hard parse due to the query change, which will remain until it's in the shared_pool.
    Edited by: DaleyB on 07-Oct-2009 04:53

  • What does 'include render files' option mean for when I duplicate a project. I deselected it and the duplicated file is very slow so maybe this has affected it. It's a shame cause original project is deleted. Have I lost the rendered files? Thanks

    What does 'include render files' option mean for when I duplicate a project. I deselected it and the duplicated file is very slow so maybe this has affected it. It's a shame cause original project is deleted. Have I lost the rendered files? Thanks

    Yes, if you duplicate without the render files and delete the original project you lose the render files. But render files get recreated - automatically if you have it set in the preferences (which is the default option). It just takes time.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error when i try to open any quicktime file...

    First it comes up with the error for that file like Alert Quicktime cannot open the file: "Prison.break.S01E10.HDTV.Xvid.LOL.avi" an unknown error has occured (-1856) then i press ok then a second error comes up Alert Quicktime cannot open the file:

  • Problem in struts validator

    hai I have a problem while using the struts validator in my program. It gives the error as: HTTP Status 404 - Servlet action is not available type Status report message Servlet action is not available description The requested resource (Servlet actio

  • Problems with the download of an application.

    I'm trying to download Adobe after effects CC for mac Adobe Creative Cloud, but remains locked and gives me error. In the Layers palette in Adobe Creative Cloud a wheel continues to turn. I have Mac OS 10.7.5 and an iMac 27 "3.4 Ghz processor with In

  • Dropbox & mycloud

    Hi guys, Quick question I need to transfer quite a lot of photo's from and to a dropbox account using my My mirror. Now I would like to know if there is a way to do so without having to keep my computer on because it takes a lot of time. I've found t

  • Adobe Acrobat subscription validation error.

    I subscribed to monthly Adobe Acrobat and installed it.  However, now whenever I open the program this pops up: "Your Acrobat subscription cannot be validated.  Please see here for more information: http://www.adobe.com/go/acro_install_license_valida