Updating Exchange 2010 to SP3

Hi,
I'm going to install Sp3 on my Exchange 2010 server today. I've already done the install on my test system and it went fine.
I have a question though. I am running a DAG. The docs I find online all say to move the databases to another node when running the update. Is this solely to keep users up and running or is it necessary to to in order for the upgrade to run properly.
I ran the upgrade on TEST without moving databases around and it seems to have worked fine (only a few users on my TEST system though).
Thanks,
Nacht

If you are running a DAG, your databases would automatically fail over when the system is rebooted. However, if you don't want any surprises, it's common practice to move everything over prior to the patching, then move back afterward. Here's a typical patching
process:
Mailbox Server patching procedures (patch DR Servers first, then Mailbox Servers last):
Install update on DR servers and reboot
On the A node in the primary site, open EMS and run this command to check the status of indexes:
Get-MailboxDatabaseCopyStatus | Fl name, contentindexstate
It should look like this for all databases:
Name             
: DB01\ServerA
ContentIndexState : Healthy
If the content index state is not healthy, run this command for each database that isn't healthy:
Update-MailboxDatabaseCopy "DB01\ServerA" -CatalogOnly
Repeat this check on the B node for the primary site, and if all is healthy, proceed to next step
On the A node in the primary site, open EMS and move active mailbox databases to the B node:
Move-ActiveMailboxDatabase -Server ServerA -ActivateOnServer ServerB -MountDialOverride:none -confirm:$false
Refresh EMC and select each DB moved, then check copy status, copy queue length and replay queue length (everything should be healthy or mounted and all queues should be at
zero)
Once databases are verified running on the B node, install patch/update on A node and reboot
Check event logs and services on the A node once it's back online
On the B node, open EMS and move all databases from B to A
Open or Refresh EMC and select each DB moved, then check copy status and queues
Once databases are verified running on the A node, install patch/update on the B node and reboot
Check event logs and services on the B node once it's back online
On the A node, open EMS and browse to
D:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\Scripts> and run this script to automatically put all databases on A node that have an activation preference of 1 on that server and leave all databases
on the B node that have an activation preference of 1 for that node
.\RedistributeActiveDatabases.ps1 -DagName DAG1 -BalanceDbsByActivationPreference -confirm:$false
Check Failover Cluster Manager:
On one of the mailbox servers, go to Start > Failover Cluster Manager, expand the DAG, then click on DAG1.contoso.local
Current Host Server (which server holds the Primary Active Manager role) should be either the A or B node. If it is the DR node, run the following command from an elevated command prompt:
cluster.exe DAG1.contoso.local group “Cluster Group” /moveto:ServerA (or ServerB)

Similar Messages

  • Change to Exchange 2010 after SP3, Update 5 installed

    After updating Exchange 2010 from SP3 Update 2 to Update 5, a change has occurred for users with SendAs and Full Access to other mailboxes. Version 14.3 (build 123.4).
    Before the Update, after giving a user these permissions to another user's mailbox, the mailbox would show in their Outlook 2010 client, and everything worked as expected.
    After Update 5 was installed, when users select the other user's mailbox, they get a message "the folders are not available," or the connection to the Exchange server is not working." They can access their own mailbox with no issues.
    The other mailbox has to be added to the Outlook client via Account Settings, Account Settings, Change, More Settings, Advanced tab, Add the other mailbox. The mailbox then shows up twice on the client, but only the one that has been added works,
    the original still gives the same error.
    Lou H.

    Hi,
    I have seen some people have the same issue with you. After upgrading to Rollup 5, they need to add others' mailboxes that they have full access permission and send as permission manually on Outlook. But when they upgrade Outlook to 2010 SP2, this issue
    is solved. I recommend you upgrade your Outlook to 2010 SP2 and check the result.
    Besides, I'm not sure what changes after Rollup 5 lead to this issue, there is no official article explain it, thanks for your understanding.
    Hope it helps.
    Best regards,
    If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Updating exchange 2010 accounts after provisioning

    Hi Guys,
    I am looking for the information on modifying exchange 2010 accounts information once we provisioined an exchange 2010 account.
    For example, renaming the mailbox in exchange2010 when there is a change in the lastname like that. All of the "UPDATED" tasks
    were given as "Required for completion". So, did not understand how the "UPDATED" tasks will work.
    Will exchange 2010 support email attribute as multi-valued?
    And how the move mailbox will work? Please provide some information.
    Thanks for your help.

    In exchange connector, all of the UPDATED tasks were given as required for completion. I believe required for completion will needed only for create user task not for all of the updated tasks.It depends on the requirement. Generally we make these task as Required for Completion only.
    If I want to update exchange 2010 mailbox, I just need to update mail atribute in AD. Is that correct?Right now, I am not sure which attribute we have to modify for renaming mailbox and whether it is supported with OOTB connector or not.
    If not then you need to extend the connector functionality but I have seen couple of threads on Google which talks about Renaming Mailbox in Exchange.
    And
    So, did not understand how the "UPDATED" tasks will work.SO I have given you link that how OIM triggers UPDATED task in any Process Defn.
    Required for Completion means: Whether task should be completed for completing the process/operation or not. It is nothing to do with UPDATED Task trigger.

  • AutoDiscover not working after Exchange 2010 SP2 - SP3 update.

    Hi Everyone, 
    I'm sorry if this is a really simple thing, but i've played around for hours and exhausted google.
    I run a 2010 exchange server for everyone at the office, and today I updated from 2010 SP2 to SP3.
    The problem I have is auto discover no longer accepts anyones username or password. If you set the account up on the client machine by manually entering the details everything works great.
    All the DNS records are correct and have been working for 2+ years. I have recreated the Autodiscovery virtual directory in EMC.
    If i manually browse to mydomain/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml, when asked for a username and password it says it incorrect. I can then log in to OWA with the same credentials and it works. 
    Thanks,
    Garrett
    The Microsoft Connectivity Analyzer is attempting to retrieve an XML Autodiscover response from URL https://mydomaincom.au:443/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml for user mydomain.com.au.
    The Microsoft Connectivity Analyzer failed to obtain an Autodiscover XML response.
    Additional Details
    An HTTP 401 Unauthorized response was received from the remote Unknown server. This is usually the result of an incorrect username or password. If you are attempting to log onto an Office 365 service, ensure you are using your full User Principal Name (UPN).
    HTTP Response Headers:
    Transfer-Encoding: chunked
    Connection: keep-alive
    Content-Type: text/html
    Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:44:51 GMT
    Set-Cookie: __cfduid=dc0261b4643b5dbe27f750bbc28bfef7c1429663490; expires=Thu, 21-Apr-16 00:44:50 GMT; path=/; domain=.macarthurcs.com.au; HttpOnly
    Server: cloudflare-nginx
    WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate,NTLM,Basic realm="mydomain.com.au"
    X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
    CF-RAY: 1dad4d701ae911c5-SJC
    Elapsed Time: 3357 ms.
    Attempting to test potential Autodiscover URL https://autodiscover.mydomain.com.au:443/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml
    Testing of this potential Autodiscover URL failed.

    Hi,
    Based on my knowledge, the above issue is caused by the loopback check being enabled. Please follow the steps below to disable loopback on the CAS servers:
    1. Run regedit, in Registry Editor, locate and then click the following registry key:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa
    2. Right-click Lsa, point to New, and then click DWORD Value.
    3. Type DisableLoopbackCheck, and then press ENTER.
    4. Right-click DisableLoopbackCheck, and then click Modify.
    5. In the Value data box, type 1, and then click OK.
    6. Quit Registry Editor, and then restart your computer.
    Hope this can be helpful to you.
    Best regards,
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Updating Exchange 2010 SP2 to SP3

    Hi,
    I'm trying to migrate our Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 to different server but first I need to update it. I managed to update from SP1 to SP2 without any major problems but now I'm trying to update form SP2 to SP3.
    Update fails when it goes to Client access role phase. In ExchangeSetup log I have following error messages:
    [07.03.2014 07:39:27.0982] [2] Active Directory session settings for 'precompile-ManagedBinary' are: View Entire Forest: 'True', Configuration Domain Controller: 'MASTER.domain.local', Preferred Global Catalog: 'MASTER.domain.local', Preferred Domain Controllers: '{ MASTER.domain.local }'
    [07.03.2014 07:39:27.0982] [2] Beginning processing precompile-ManagedBinary -BinaryName:'C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\bin\microsoft.exchange.addressbook.service.exe'
    [07.03.2014 07:39:27.0982] [2] Starting: C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v2.0.50727\ngen.exe with arguments: install "C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\bin\microsoft.exchange.addressbook.service.exe" /queue /nologo /verbose
    [07.03.2014 07:39:28.0247] [2] Process standard output: Installing assembly C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\bin\microsoft.exchange.addressbook.service.exe
    Catastrophic failure (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8000FFFF (E_UNEXPECTED))
    [07.03.2014 07:39:28.0263] [2] Process standard error:
    [07.03.2014 07:39:28.0263] [2] Process standard error: Retry(1/3): exception: Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.TaskException: Process execution failed with exit code -1.
    [07.03.2014 07:39:29.0292] [2] Process standard output: Installing assembly C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\bin\microsoft.exchange.addressbook.service.exe
    Catastrophic failure (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8000FFFF (E_UNEXPECTED))
    [07.03.2014 07:39:29.0292] [2] Process standard error:
    [07.03.2014 07:39:29.0292] [2] Process standard error: Retry(2/3): exception: Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.TaskException: Process execution failed with exit code -1.
    [07.03.2014 07:39:30.0322] [2] Process standard output: Installing assembly C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\bin\microsoft.exchange.addressbook.service.exe
    Catastrophic failure (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8000FFFF (E_UNEXPECTED))
    [07.03.2014 07:39:30.0322] [2] Process standard error:
    [07.03.2014 07:39:30.0322] [2] Process standard error: Retry(3/3): exception: Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.TaskException: Process execution failed with exit code -1.
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0367] [2] Process standard output: Installing assembly C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\bin\microsoft.exchange.addressbook.service.exe
    Catastrophic failure (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8000FFFF (E_UNEXPECTED))
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0367] [2] Process standard error:
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0367] [2] [ERROR] Unexpected Error
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0367] [2] [ERROR] Process execution failed with exit code -1.
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0367] [2] Ending processing precompile-ManagedBinary
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0367] [1] The following 1 error(s) occurred during task execution:
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0367] [1] 0. ErrorRecord: Process execution failed with exit code -1.
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0367] [1] 0. ErrorRecord: Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.TaskException: Process execution failed with exit code -1.
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0367] [1] [ERROR] The following error was generated when "$error.Clear();
    $fullPath = [System.IO.Path]::Combine($RoleInstallPath, "bin\microsoft.exchange.addressbook.service.exe");
    precompile-ManagedBinary -BinaryName $fullPath;
    " was run: "Process execution failed with exit code -1.".
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0367] [1] [ERROR] Process execution failed with exit code -1.
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0367] [1] [ERROR-REFERENCE] Id=AddressBookComponent___6f3e1aaa7a2d468a9f3e83382ec479b2 Component=EXCHANGE14:\Current\Release\Shared\Datacenter\Setup
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0383] [1] Setup is stopping now because of one or more critical errors.
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0383] [1] Finished executing component tasks.
    [07.03.2014 07:39:31.0383] [1] Ending processing Install-ClientAccessRole
    I have tried couple of times and rebooted the server without success. Any help?
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    I'm running SBS2011 and was not able to use ExBPA.
    I ended to create new domain + exchange to my enviroment since I had backed up data from server previously.
    Thank you

  • Need to update Exchange 2010 to SP1 from base

    I need to update my base install of Exchange 2010 to SP1 and eventually SP2. This sits on a 2008 R2 server. in reading other upgrade articles, there are references to needing hotfixes at the server level - 2008 R2. There are about 5 hot fixes referenced
    to upgrade to SP1 and I would assume there are a few others for the update to SP2.
    Currently the 2008 R2 server is patched via Windows update through February 2014 (including SP1 for the server). Given that, can I assume that the hot fix updates have been incorporated into other updates/patches along the way for the Windows 2008 R2
    server? Or do i still have to install each of those hotfixes manually?
    Also, in one of the patches, it spoke of needing, or using .net framework 2.0 and 3.51. currently my system has 4.5.1 on it. do i need 2.0 and 3.51 for SP1 to be installed and work correctly?
    thanks
    dave

    Hi Dave,
    I recommend you install Exchange 2010 SP3 directly. There is no need to upgrade to Exchange 2010 SP1 and then to SP2.
    Service Packs are cumulative, Exchange 2010 SP3 include all fixes included in previous RUs and service packs. Here is a blog for your reference.
    Released: Exchange Server 2010 SP3
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/02/12/released-exchange-server-2010-sp3.aspx
    Since Windows updated through February 2014, you don't need to install each of those hotfixes manually.
    Besides, I would like to verify if you download .net framework 4.5.1 from website. There is no need to install it that way. You just need to open Server Manager, add .Net Framework 3.5.1 feature.
    Hope my clarification is helpful.
    Best regards,
    Amy
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Update Exchange 2010 from 14.1.218.15 to SP2

    HI All,
    We are using Exchange server 2010, it is recently deployed in the production environment, I want to know what is the process to apply patches and SP update on exchange server.
    As we are running exchange 2010 SP1 14.1.218.15 and should I apply SP 2 diretly on it or I have to apply from
    Update Rollup 1 to Update Rollup 7-v3 for Exchange Server 2010 SP1
    first and then apply SP2,
    Your suggestions are required.
    Regards
    Sameer

    As lynn said you don't need to apply RU's as you can directly install the latest service pack.
    Please note that Support for SP1 & SP2 (Exchange 2010) is ended and hence i recommend you to upgrade to SP3.
    You should upgrade your Exchange 2010 server roles in the following order:
    Client Access
    Hub Transport
    Unified Messaging
    Mailbox
    Edge Transport
    Also, while patching CAS Servers, Internet Facing CAS Servers should have to be patched first. In case if you have CAS Servers in CAS Array then you will have to remove the CAS Server from the array while patching and should add CAS Server back to CAS Array
    after patching/reboot.
    For more information about patching/upgrading exchange you can refer: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/library/bb629560(v=exchg.141).aspx
    Pavan Maganti ~ ( Exchange | 2003/2007/2010/E15(2013)) ~~ Please remember to click “Vote As Helpful" if it really helps and "Mark as Answer” if it answers your question, “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your
    question. ~~ This Information is provided is "AS IS" and confers NO Rights!!

  • Cannot install KB982867 while trying to Upgrade exchange 2010 to SP3

    I  just had to reinstall Server 2008 standard with Exchange 2010. I am now trying to install SP3 on Exchange and got all the hotfixs but the KB982867. I go to the link on the install screen and it take me to a Archive page. I did find on the web a download
    for the hotfix but it will not install. It turns out to be net frame works 4.0. This is the message I get.  KB2532942 does not apply, or is blocked by another condition on your computer. I currently have installed net frameworks 3.5 SP1 and 4.5.1 . This
    is the message I am getting during the install.    Client Access Role Prerequisites
    Failed
    Error:
    Install hotfix Microsoft Knowledge Base article 982867 from http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/KB982867.
    Click here for help... http://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/ms.exch.err.default(EXCHG.141).aspx?v=14.1.218.11&e=ms.exch.err.Ex28883C&l=0&cl=cp
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:14
    Thanks
    Zman

    Hi Zman,
    Before you install KB2532942, you must have the .NET Framework 4 installed to apply this hotfix rollup.
    The related KB for your reference:
    Hotfix rollup package 2532942 is available for Windows Communication Foundation for the .NET Framework 4
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2532942
    If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to post back.
    Best regards,
    Eric

  • Update Exchange 2010 - Things to Consider?

    I also like to run BPA and check the event logs and system resources before installing any Exchange updates. If the VM has been up for a while, give it a reboot first. I usually check the release notes too: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3049853

    We haven't updated our exchange 2010 server in a long time.
    In the Update queue is 'Update Rollup 10 for Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 3'
    Anything to consider or watch out for before pulling the trigger?
    It's running on Server 2012 standard as a VM.
    Thanks for all input!
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

  • EWS 1.2, Exchange 2010 SP2/SP3 - Appointment message body gets wrecked on update

    We're seeing a very irritating issue with EWS and Exchange when updating the message body on an Appointment. To head it off, it does not appear to be the bug detailed here:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dhruvkh/archive/2012/05/18/sending-appointments-from-ews-apps-where-did-my-html-go.aspx
    It happens on both 2010 SP2 and SP3. We're creating Appointments with some HTML formatting the message body. Nothing fancy, just a few tables and a little bit of inline styling (since a css style header disappears into a black hole when you try to use it
    as part of the Appointment message body). We're able to make a nice-looking message body that goes out in the meeting requests. Well, with the exception of downlevel text at the top, but there doesn't seem to be much we can do about that short of a double-tap
    save.
    The problem comes into play if we need to update the message body on the Appointment. All of this is automated, so the user cannot directly edit it. If we make any changes to the message body, it completely wrecks the HTML. It's still an HTML-formatted message,
    but much of the styling is lost and it looks awful. This happens without fail when we alter the message body of an Appointment with any considerable level of HTML formatting. BodyType is HTML, of course. I've done some digging on the best body algorithm and
    some of the MAPI properties related to it. Some interesting bits of note:
    When the Appointment is first saved, PidTagRtfInSync is true. PidTagNativeBody is 2, which indicates an RTF message. PidTagBody is present. PidTagRtfCompressed is present. However, PidTagBodyHtml is not present. After updating the Appointment with a message
    body edit, PidTagBodyHtml is present, but now PidTagRtfInSync is false and PidTagNativeBody is 3.
    If PidTagBodyHtml is set directly as an extended property instead of setting the message body via the EWS Appointment object, then the formatting is wrecked right out of the gate. At least it's consistent that way...
    Attempting to set PidTagNativeBody manually had no effect.
    When viewing the PR_BODY_HTML contents between a good and bad message, the good one will contain the transformed HTML. It doesn't look much like what we had initially handed to it, but gets changed in the conversion process. The bad one is much closer to
    what we wrote in actual HTML, but has still had much of the styling removed. It's as if creating the Appointment does the RTF conversion, but any subsequent changes use a completely different code path serverside and there does not appear to be any way around
    it short of even more guess and check with EWS and Exchange chewing up HTML. This is complicated by being unable to find any documentation that details how and what gets changed, discarded, etc in the process.
    This will always affect requests, but only seems to affect Appointments in the calendar of attendees if the body includes the downlevel text. Appointments without the downlevel text appear to survive updates with their formatting intact. Appointments with
    downlevel text get their formatting wrecked with updates.
    Has anyone run into this before? It was painful enough when we found that our previously-used email HTML formatter wouldn't work with EWS and everything had to be inlined, but now it seems that there are even more inexplicable problems to get around. Is
    there a way to update the message body without this happening?

    Ugh... hopefully I can ask you gentleman how to solve my issue.
    I recently implemented code to allow our users to turn-on HTML-encoding for when our Sync'ing app goes to add/update items for them into Exchange.
    If thev'ye turned-on HTML formatting, when I create a CalendarItemType's (in C# based off the EWSProxies.EWS.Itemtype) the Body.Value is being set with a string which contains very minimal HTML tags... just <br>'s instead of "\r\n" and for
    URL link values we are embedding into the text, I'm encapsulating those within an <a href> 
    Example: <a href="http://TheWebSite.com/EventDisplay.aspx?uri=1234">Event Display Link</a>
    My problem is... when I retrieve an item from Exchange... there is a huge amount of extra HTML encoding it wraps around everything! 
    By inspecting in the debugger... I've discerned that :
    For Appts... the main bunch of text that I inserted in an item when originally creating it is contained just within the <div> tag.
    For Tasks... the main bunch of text that I inserted in an item when originally creating it is contained just within the <body> tag (and on these there is no <div> tag created).
    I was able to use the HTML Agility Pack and load this Body.Value string into the enhanced HtmlDocument object.  I first attempt to parse first for the <div> nodes contents. If the <div> is not-null that's an Appt.  If the <div>
    is null, I instead parse out the <body> nodes contents, and those are Tasks.
    I noticed for Appts :
    For every <br> tag I had in my original text.. it appends two consecutive "\r\n" 's after it!  No problem I can just do a Replace("\r\n", "")  and zap those. But then the <a href> I have in there... it
    encapsulates it with a <font> node where it sets a color for the link and also an underline <u> node.  I can handle the <u> nodes easy enough with a Replace("<u>","") and a Replace("</u>", ""); 
    But what about the damn <font> node?  It's in the format of <font color=\"blue\"></font> and I'm sure the \"blue"\ part could be different for every user.
    I noticed for Tasks :
    It prepends a "\r\n" just inside the begininng<body> tag. Each of the original <br> tags gets an "\r\n" appended behind it.  and for the TaskType for the <a href> node IT DOES NOT encapsulate it with the <font>
    and <u> nodes as it does for the Appt.
    How can I stop it from changing the Body content when retrieving it?  Will it not change anything if I go the extra mile and make sure to wrap everything with an <html> and <body> node when initially creating the items?
    Any and all help on this issue is sorely appreciated.
    Thank You,
    -G

  • Updating Exchange 2010 SP2 to SP3UR9

    Dear Experts,
    I am currently preparing my SBS 2011 for a migration to Server 2012 R2 with Exchange 2013 installed. On my SBS 2011 I ran the Best Practices Analyzer 1.3 and it mentions that "the most recent Update Rollup is not installed". In the Exchange
    Management Console I see that I have Version 14.2 (Build 247.5) installed.
    I have seen that there is an Exchange SP3 along with Update Rollup 9 available. I have installed all Windows Updates - no Exchange rollups were installed. Should I update to 2010SP3UR9? How do I best perform this update - install 2010SP2RU8, then 2010SP3
    and finally 2010SP3UR9?
    Thanks for your help.

    You have to upgrade to 2010 SP3 first, then upgrade to the latest RU after that.
    I would also ask in the SBS forums as sometimes there are special considerations around upgrades.
    Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

  • Exchange Upgrade from exchange 2010 to SP3 - error

    Organization Preparation
    Failed
    Error:
    The following error was generated when "$error.Clear();
    install-ExchangeSchema -LdapFileName ($roleInstallPath + "Setup\Data\"+$RoleSchemaPrefix + "schema0.ldf")"was run: "There was an error while running 'ldifde.exe' to import the schema file
    'C:\Windows\Temp\ExchangeSetup\Setup\Data\PostExchange2003_schema0.ldf'. The error code is: 8224. More details can be found in the error file:
    'C:\Users\dimallick\AppData\Local\Temp\ldif.err'".
    There was an error while running 'ldifde.exe' to import the schema file
    'C:\Windows\Temp\ExchangeSetup\Setup\Data\PostExchange2003_schema0.ldf'. The error code is: 8224. More details can be found in the error file:
    'C:\Users\dimallick\AppData\Local\Temp\ldif.err'
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:01
    Preparing Setup
    Cancelled
    Stopping Services
    Cancelled
    Languages
    Cancelled
    Remove Exchange Files
    Cancelled
    Preparing Files
    Cancelled
    Copy Exchange Files
    Cancelled
    Language Files
    Cancelled
    Restoring services
    Cancelled
    Languages
    Cancelled
    Hub Transport Role
    Cancelled
    Client Access Role
    Cancelled
    Mailbox Role
    Cancelled
    Management Tools
    Cancelled
    Finalizing Setup
    Cancelled

    Hi,
    Have you checked DareDevil's suggestion? Have you resolved this issue?
    If there is any update, please feel free to post here for further research.
    Best regards,
    Belinda
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 SP3 OWA with certificate based authentication

    Hi,
    I have a bizarre problem in my customer’s environment. Maybe someone has an idea.
    Exchange 2010 with SP3, latest cumulative Update installed.
    The problem I’m having is that when I enable Certificate based authentication (require client certificate option in IIS) on OWA and ECP virtual directories in conjunction with forms based authentication (this is the requirement – the user
    must have a client certificate and type in username and password to log in to OWA), the result is that after the user selects the certificate he wants to use, he is logged into OWA automatically, but cannot use the website, because it’s being constantly automatically
    refreshed (or redirected to itself or something like that). The behavior occurs with all users, with any browser. If client certificate is on required, forms based authentication works just fine. If I switch to “Basic Authentication” and enable client certificate
    requirement, then OWA act’s as it should be – so no problems. The problem only occurs when authentication type is forms based and client certificates are required.
    I have tried the exact same settings (as far as I can tell) on one other production server and one test server, and encountered no such problems.
    Anyone – any ideas?

    Hi McWax,
    According to your description and test, I understand that all accounts cannot login OWA when select require client certificate.
    Is there any error message when open OWA or login? For example, return error ”HTTP error: 403 - Forbidden”. Please post relative error for further troubleshooting.
    I want to confirm which authentication methods are used for OWA, Integrated Windows authentication or Digest authentication? More details about it, for your reference:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb430796(v=exchg.141).aspx
    If you select another authentication method, please check whether Client Certificate Mapping Authentication services is installed, and also enabled in IIS, please refer to:
    http://www.iis.net/configreference/system.webserver/security/authentication/clientcertificatemappingauthentication
    To prevent firewall factor, please try to sign in OWA at CAS server. Besides, I find a FAQ about certificate:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998424(v=exchg.80).aspx
    Best Regards,
    Allen Wang

  • Windows 8.1 Mail app and Exchange 2010 EAS partnership - "Make Windows user account an Administrator" to meet security requirements?

    As the title says,  I have a new Windows 8.1 based device which I'm trying to connect to my Exchange 2010 box (SP3 Update Rollup 2).  I currently have my iphone set up as an EAS client with no problems.  I have an EAS policy on my mailbox
    with the following settings surrounding passwords :
    Require Password, Require Encryption, Allow Simple Password, Time without user input - 10 minutes.  Allow non-provisional devices is also checked.
    The Windows 8.1 device has Bitlocker enabled, which meets the encryption requirement - I know this because the 1st time I tried this it moaned about Bitlocker needing to be enabled to meet requirements, though at that time the local user account on the Windows
    8.1 device was an admin level account so it never mentioned this issue, it worked normally.
    Now, while using a std user account on the Windows 8.1 device and trying to connect up via EAS, it complains that my local windows user account must be an ADMIN level account to meet the security requirements...?
    Anyone encountered this?

    Did anyone solve this problem? I'm also struggling with this issue.
    this is still a problem. I'm just hitting it now and it's not doing much for management's love of Microsoft devices.
    Evidently, it has to be an admin to set the policies on the device to match the policies on the EAS. And once set, a user can be changed back.
    But this is seriously not cool. Don't the "app" folks and the enterprise folks talk to each other?

  • Exchange 2010 Activesync Quarantine message to admin missing ECP URL?

    Hi folks,
    I have recently enabled the Active Sync quarantine feature in Exchange 2010 (running SP3) and it is working perfectly. However, a co-worker states that during his testing roughly a year ago, the message sent to administrators advising of the device being quarantined
    contained a URL that you could click, it would take you to the ECP page where you would need to click approve. I have posted the message received currently by admins below, does anyone know why the URL is not embedded or is there another step somewhere I missed?
    Is it possible that SP3 or another Exchange related update removed the URL from the message?
    The Exchange ActiveSync service has quarantined the mobile phone listed below. It won't be able to synchronize Exchange content until you take action.
    To perform an action for this device, select the device from among the quarantined devices displayed on the ActiveSync Access tab in the Exchange Control Panel.
    Information about the device that triggered this notice:
    User: [email protected]
    Device model: Q10 xxxxxxxx
    Device type: BlackBerry
    Device ID: xxxxxxxxxxx
    Device OS: BlackBerry 10
    Device user agent: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Device phone number: *******9502
    Device IMEI: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Exchange ActiveSync version: 14.1
    Device policy applied: Default
    Device policies status: AppliedInFull
    Device access state: Quarantined
    Device access state reason: Global
    Device access control rule:
    Sent at 11/19/2014 11:21:33 AM to [email protected]
    I should also mention that when I run "Get-EcpVirtualDirectory -server xxxxxxx | format-list" the internal URL is correct (https://webmail.domain.com/ecp) and the external URL is blank (which is fine by me).

    I should also mention that when I run "Get-EcpVirtualDirectory -server xxxxxxx | format-list" the internal URL is correct (https://webmail.domain.com/ecp) and the external URL is blank (which is fine by me).
    Hi,
    Good that you mentioned that, cause that is the reason why you don't get a link in the Quarantine message sent to the AdminRecipient.
    Martina Miskovic

Maybe you are looking for