Upgrading to a different plan
Hi,
At the moment all I require is InDesign CC, my current versions of Photoshop and Illustrator will suffice for a while. If I was to purchase an InDesign CC Membership and wanted to upgrade to the full plan say in 6 months, would there be a price penalty to pay?
Many thanks
Paul
Upgrade single to all Cloud http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1235382 may help
Similar Messages
-
I broke my old phone a few days ago, and my phone number doesn't have an upgrade until the summer of next year. My dad offered me his upgrade, since he doesn't need a new phone and it would save me a few hundred dollars. Is it possible for me to go into the Apple store and purchase a new iPhone when I'm using an upgrade from a different phone number? I already cleared it over with the people at Verizon, who told me I could switch the upgrade over online.
There are 2 issues here.
Some carriers REQUIRE a data plan in order to use an iPhone on their network. This requirement will vary from carrier to carrier. The iPhone is designed to be constantly connected. If you do not manually go in and turn off cellular data (not just 3G) The phone will attempt to connect to the Internet over the cellular data network. If you have your carrier specifically block these requests, you shouldn't be charged for them. If not, it could end up costing you lots of money you didn't expect. The other thing that will happen is things like visual voicemail will not work (if the carrier supports it to begin with) and you will get lots of messages about not being able to connect to cellular data if you're not in range of WiFi you can connect to. MMS messaging also will not work.
The second issue surrounds the statement: "use the iphone 4 with a standard cdma phone plan".
It is NOT possible to purchase an unlocked CDMA iPhone. ALL CDMA iPhones are locked to Verizon. -
Different plan for same SQL in different version of DB
Hello,
At client side i have upgraded database from 11.2.0.1.0 to 11.2.0.2.0 . and after that i am facing performance related issue.
is this happen because of up-gradation ?
for testing i have created two different version db (i.e 11.2.0.1.0 to 11.2.0.2.0 ) with same volume and same parameter. now i am executing same query then i am getting different plan.
please help me to resolve this issue..Which issue? CBO is upgraded with every new release! So, yes, execution plans may change because of that.
And sensible DBA's first upgrade a test database.
Also no statement is to be seen.
Secondly, you can always set optimizer_features_enable to the lower release.
Finally, please look up 'upgradation' in an English dictionary. You won't find it!!!
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA -
CBO generating different plans for the same data in similar Environments
Hi All
I have been trying to compare an SQL from 2 different but similar environments build of the same hardware specs .The issue I am facing is environment A, the query executes in less than 2 minutes with plan mostly showing full table scans and hash join whereas in environment B(problematic), it times out after 2 hours with an error of unable to extend table space . The statistics are up to date in both environments for both tables and indexes . System parameters are exactly similar(default oracle for except for multiblock_read_count ).
Both Environment have same db parameter for db_file_multiblock_read_count(16), optimizer(refer below),hash_area_size (131072),pga_aggregate_target(1G),db_block_size(8192) etc . SREADTIM, MREADTIM, CPUSPEED, MBRC are all null in aux_stats in both environment because workload was never collected i believe.
Attached is details about the SQL with table stats, SQL and index stats my main concern is CBO generating different plans for the similar data and statistics and same hardware and software specs. Is there any thing else I should consider .I generally see environment B being very slow and always plans tend to nested loops and index scan whereas what we really need is a sensible FTS in many cases. One of the very surprising thing is METER_CONFIG_HEADER below which has just 80 blocks of data is being asked for index scan.
show parameter optimizer
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
**Environment**
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Note: : There are slight difference in the no of records in the attached sheet.However, I wanted to tell that i have tested with exact same data and was getting similar results but I couldn't retain the data untill collecting the details in the attachment
TEST1 COMPARE TABLE LEVE STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS BLOCKS LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET 3607425 167760 5/02/2013 22:11
METER_CONFIG_HEADER 3658 80 5/01/2013 0:07
METER_CONFIG_ITEM 32310 496 5/01/2013 0:07
NMI 1899024 33557 18/02/2013 10:55
REGISTER 4830153 101504 18/02/2013 9:57
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET 1607456 19137 18/02/2013 15:48
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER 5110781 78691 18/02/2013 9:56
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT 1425890 42468 18/02/2013 13:54
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS BLOCKS LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET 4133939 198570 16/02/2013 10:02
METER_CONFIG_HEADER 3779 80 16/02/2013 10:55
METER_CONFIG_ITEM 33720 510 16/02/2013 10:55
NMI 1969000 33113 16/02/2013 10:58
REGISTER 5837874 120104 16/02/2013 11:05
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET 1788152 22325 16/02/2013 11:06
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER 6101934 91088 16/02/2013 11:07
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT 1447589 43804 16/02/2013 11:11
TEST ITEM 2 COMPARE INDEX STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME UNIQUENESS BLEVEL LEAF_BLOCKS DISTINCT_KEYS AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY CLUSTERING_FACTOR NUM_ROWS
ASSET IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK NONUNIQUE 2 9878 67 147 12982 869801 3553095
ASSET IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 7291 2747 2 639 1755977 3597916
ASSET SYS_C00102592 UNIQUE 2 12488 3733831 1 1 3726639 3733831
METER_CONFIG_HEADER SYS_C0092052 UNIQUE 1 12 3670 1 1 3590 3670
METER_CONFIG_ITEM SYS_C0092074 UNIQUE 1 104 32310 1 1 32132 32310
NMI IDX_NMI_ID NONUNIQUE 2 6298 844853 1 2 1964769 1965029
NMI IDX_NMI_ID_NK NONUNIQUE 2 6701 1923072 1 1 1922831 1923084
NMI IDX_NMI_STATS NONUNIQUE 1 106 4 26 52 211 211
REGISTER REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM NONUNIQUE 2 12498 795 15 2899 2304831 4711808
REGISTER SYS_C00102653 UNIQUE 2 16942 5065660 1 1 5056855 5065660
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3667 1607968 1 1 1607689 1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SDP_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3811 668727 1 2 1606204 1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET SYS_C00102665 UNIQUE 2 5116 1529606 1 1 1528136 1529606
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER SYS_C00102677 UNIQUE 2 17370 5193638 1 1 5193623 5193638
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4406 676523 1 2 1423247 1425890
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 7374 676523 1 2 1458238 1461108
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT SYS_C00102687 UNIQUE 2 4737 1416207 1 1 1415022 1416207
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME UNIQUENESS BLEVEL LEAF_BLOCKS DISTINCT_KEYS AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY CLUSTERING_FACTOR NUM_ROWS
ASSET IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK NONUNIQUE 2 8606 121 71 16428 1987833 4162257
ASSET IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 8432 1780146 1 1 2048170 4162257
ASSET SYS_C00116157 UNIQUE 2 13597 4162263 1 1 4158759 4162263
METER_CONFIG_HEADER SYS_C00116570 UNIQUE 1 12 3779 1 1 3734 3779
METER_CONFIG_ITEM SYS_C00116592 UNIQUE 1 107 33720 1 1 33459 33720
NMI IDX_NMI_ID NONUNIQUE 2 6319 683370 1 2 1970460 1971313
NMI IDX_NMI_ID_NK NONUNIQUE 2 6597 1971293 1 1 1970771 1971313
NMI IDX_NMI_STATS NONUNIQUE 1 98 48 2 4 196 196
REGISTER REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM NONUNIQUE 2 15615 1273 12 2109 2685924 5886582
REGISTER SYS_C00116748 UNIQUE 2 19533 5886582 1 1 5845565 5886582
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4111 1795084 1 1 1758441 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SDP_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4003 674249 1 2 1787987 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET SYS_C004520 UNIQUE 2 5864 1795130 1 1 1782147 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER SYS_C004539 UNIQUE 2 20413 6152850 1 1 6073059 6152850
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3227 660649 1 2 1422572 1447803
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 6399 646257 1 2 1346948 1349993
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT SYS_C00128706 UNIQUE 2 4643 1447946 1 1 1442796 1447946
TEST ITEM 3 COMPARE PLANS
ENVIRONMENT A
Plan hash value: 4109575732
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 6 | 900 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:04 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN ANTI | | 1 | 137 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:03 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| NMI | 1 | 22 | | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 131 | | 95137 (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 109 | | 95132 (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ASSET | 36074 | 1021K| | 38553 (2)| 00:07:43 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 90361 | 7059K| 4040K| 56578 (2)| 00:11:19 |
|* 10 | HASH JOIN | | 52977 | 3414K| 2248K| 50654 (2)| 00:10:08 |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN | | 39674 | 1782K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 39439 | 1232K| | 22584 (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 4206K| 56M| | 17490 (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT | 675K| 12M| | 9412 (2)| 00:01:53 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET | 1178K| 15M| | 4262 (2)| 00:00:52 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_NMI_ID_NK | 2 | | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 17 | VIEW | | 39674 | 232K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 18 | HASH JOIN | | 39674 | 1046K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 19 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 39439 | 500K| | 22584 (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 4206K| 56M| | 17490 (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_HEADER | 3658 | 47554 | | 19 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_ITEM | 7590 | 68310 | | 112 (2)| 00:00:02 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
3 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
4 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
7 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD" AND "SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
8 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
9 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
10 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
11 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
12 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
13 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
18 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
19 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
20 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
22 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
ENVIRONMENT B
Plan hash value: 2826260434
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN ANTI | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 176 | 56855 (2)| 00:11:23 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 163 | 36577 (2)| 00:07:19 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ASSET | 1 | 44 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 131 | 9834 (2)| 00:01:59 |
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 87 | 9830 (2)| 00:01:58 |
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 74 | 9825 (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 52 | 9820 (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| METER_CONFIG_HEADER | 1 | 14 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 33 | 116 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_ITEM | 1 | 19 | 115 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 13 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C00116570 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT | 723K| 13M| 9699 (2)| 00:01:57 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | NMI | 1 | 22 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_NMI_ID_NK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET | 1 | 13 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_SLA_SDP_SK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 76113 | 2378K| 26743 (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 5095K| 63M| 20245 (2)| 00:04:03 |
| 22 | VIEW | | 90889 | 443K| 47021 (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 23 | HASH JOIN | | 90889 | 2307K| 47021 (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 24 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 76113 | 966K| 26743 (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 25 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 5095K| 63M| 20245 (2)| 00:04:03 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
3 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK" AND
"SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
4 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD")
5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
9 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
10 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
12 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
13 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
17 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
18 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
19 - access("SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
20 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
23 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
24 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
25 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:16 PM
Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:18 PMHi Paul,
I misread your question initially .The system stats are outdated in both ( same result as seen from aux_stats) .I am not a DBA and do not have access to gather system stats fresh.
select * from sys.aux_stats$
SNAME PNAME PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO STATUS NULL COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTART NULL 02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTOP NULL 02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO FLAGS 1 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEEDNW 1321.20523 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOSEEKTIM 10 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOTFRSPEED 4096 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN SREADTIM NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MREADTIM NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEED NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MBRC NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MAXTHR NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN SLAVETHR NULL NULL -
Two different plans in TEST & Prod
hi,
we have a problem in production database where we find some sql statements running very slow.
but if you run same SQL statement in TEST it runs < 2 secs.
Production DB Prod.SchemaA is exported into TEST DB as Test.SchemaA
When study the explain plan, we find Prod explain plan is different than test. if you create sql profile, by copying TEST explain plan, it would run faster in Production.
Now our question is why optimizer goes through two different plans when the schema structure same and data almost same in two databases?
Note that, we have two almost identical schema's in Production. Prod.SchemaA and Prod.SchemaB has same object names but some Prod.SchemaB may have small difference in indexes/constraints.
Users would run same SQL statement both in Prod.SchemaA & Prod.SchemaB time to time.
thanks
nealYou can have a clear picture about the accuracy of your statistics by getting the execution plan from memory into the TEST and PROD environment. You can proceed as follows
PROD> alter session set statistics_level=ALL;
PROD> execute your query;
PROD> select * from table (dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null,null, 'ALLSTATS LAST'));
TEST> alter session set statistics_level=ALL;
TEST> execute your query
TEST> select * from table (dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null,null, 'ALLSTATS LAST'));
This will give an execution plan showing the estimations(E-Rows) done by the CBO and the Actual (A-Rows) rows generated allowing you to judge the accuracy of your statistics.
The predicate part of the execution plan can also show inportant information.
Best regards
Mohamed Houri
www.hourim.wordpress.com -
Creation Of A Single Purchase Requisition From Different Planned Orders
Hi,
After MRP run i get different Planned Orders for different raw materials . My requirement is that can i combine all the Planned Orders for diiferent materials into a single Purchase Requisition.This is a urgent requirement.
If useful i will award points.
Regards
JimmyHi,
it is not possible to combine with planned orders for different materials into single PR but differet PR can combine into a single Purchase Order.
pls let me know any clarification.
thanks
mohan
Message was edited by:
Mohan Ramalingam -
I bought a 16gb iphone 5 about 3 months ago and got applecare. yesterday I had to get on a different plan within the same company so i traded in my phone and got a new 32gb iphone 5. can i transfer my applecare to this new phone or would I have to buy it again?
As this is a WW forum with different AppleCrare offerings you need to specify which Country
as in North America has AppleCare+ and everywhere else AppleCare ,very different products
So to avoid incorrect guidance suggest you specify Country -
I used an upgrade from a different phone to purchase a new iPhone. How do I assign that phone its original number (not the one that it was upgraded from)?
Phone number of the device is assigned by the carrier.
Ask the carrier. -
SQL query with different plans
Hi,
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
I cannot paste the query plan due to company policies. I can see issue with the query plan, where it is doing partition range scan (with hash join) on one environment due to which it has full table scan, on and nested loop on the second environment with Index range which is fast as compared to partition range scan.
I have checked the stats,looks updated.
Any thoughts,...How, exactly, did you check the statistics? Did you just check when they were generated? Or did you check whether they were actually (more or less) the same?
Is it an issue with bind variable peeking?
Are there optimizer-related parameters that are different either for the databases or for different systems?
Have you looked at a 10053 trace to see how the slower system is evaluating the faster plan?
Unfortunately, without more information, it's going to be nearly impossible for us to help you narrow down the problem. We can speculate about things that might cause one environment to generate a different plan but we're blind to the details that would help us figure out which factors are actually influencing your particular systems.
Justin -
CK11n with activity prices from different plan versions
Hello,
We are looking for a simple & practical way to calculate a standard cost estimate for a material using activity prices from different CO plan version.
In the valuation variant of the costing variant the CO plan version is determined from where the activity prices are taken, eg version 0
So, we want to cost the same material using the activity prices of a different plan version, eg 90, or 91 ... but without using a different costing variant per CO plan version(so without having to create/customize a separate costing variant per CO plan version)
Is this possible?
Can we use costing versions in this respect?
Many thanks
AlainHi,
Thanks for quick feedback ... but how do you assign this valuation variant in the costing version... ?
Can you enter is in CK11n? or what transaction needs to be customized?
Thanks, Alain -
Question : Different planning strategies in SAP PP
Hi PP gurus ,
Help me in understanding purpose with suitable example different planning strategies say Strategy 10 , 11 , 20 , 30 , 26 , 40 and 50 . Find below an
example for which how the above said strategies will act wrt .
Ex : You have Unrestricted stock of say X = 100 pcs and stock in quality
inspection is X = 10 pcs .
You have PIR ( X ) = 100 pcs , Production order( X ) = 50 pcs ,
Sales order( X ) = 150 pcs , Production order against sales order (X) =150
pcs , Inprocess (X) = 30 Units , sales order stock (X) = 25 units .
Thanx in advance
Regards,
RajRaj,
Have you gone through the help doc for planning strategies:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/cb/7f9b7043b711d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
In overall terms:
In make to stock - 10, 11, 40
In MTS the general stock and general prod orders in warehouse are considered incalculating the net requirement. The diff between 10 and 11 is that in 11 irrespective of Warehouse stock prod takes place as per Planned Ind requirements. But in 10 the warehouse stock is considered.
In MTO (20/ 50):
The sales order stock and prod order w.r.to sales order aone is considered.
Hope this will give you an overall idea.
regards
ram -
The same query but different plan?
Hi all
I don't understand why the same query but Oracle use different plan
explain plan for select far.id,fab.id
from agent_body fab
INNER JOIN agent_ref far ON (far.bodyid = fab.id)
WHERE fab.id=72449;
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 18 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 18 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 2 | PARTITION HASH SINGLE | | 1 | 6 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 4 | 4 |
|* 3 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_AGENT_BODY | 1 | 6 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 4 | 4 |
| 4 | PARTITION HASH ALL | | 1 | 12 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 4 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| AGENT_REF | 1 | 12 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 4 |
|* 6 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IXAGRAD | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 4 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("FAB"."ID"=72449)
6 - access("FAR"."BODYID"=72449)
AND
explain plan for select far.id,fab.id
from agent_ref far,agent_body fab
where fab.id=far.bodyid and far.id=2219306;
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 18 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 18 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 2 | PARTITION HASH SINGLE | | 1 | 12 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 3 | 3 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| AGENT_REF | 1 | 12 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 3 | 3 |
|* 4 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_AGENT_REF | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 3 | 3 |
| 5 | PARTITION HASH ITERATOR | | 3348K| 19M| 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
|* 6 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_AGENT_BODY | 3348K| 19M| 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
4 - access("FAR"."ID"=2219306)
6 - access("FAB"."ID"="FAR"."BODYID")
Can anyone explain to me?
Thanksuser554265 wrote:
Hi all
I don't understand why the same query but Oracle use different plan
explain plan for select far.id,fab.id
from agent_body fab
INNER JOIN agent_ref far ON (far.bodyid = fab.id)
WHERE fab.id=72449;
AND
explain plan for select far.id,fab.id
from agent_ref far,agent_body fab
where fab.id=far.bodyid and far.id=2219306;
Can anyone explain to me?Perhaps this makes a difference...
WHERE fab.id=72449; and
and far.id=2219306; Essentially the two queries ARE different. -
Screen saver won't start since Lion upgrade. Two different machines, same issue.
Screen saver won't start since Lion upgrade. Two different machines, same issue. Help
For anyone following this thread, I've found a solution to my problem. Turns out that a cute widget called FishTank appears to be the culprit. With it running in Dashboard (even when I don't see Dashboard) the Screensaver and Sleep functions don't work. I turned it off, not because I'm clever, just because I tired of it, and voilà, Screensaver and Sleep are now working. It can stay in my widgets list without any problem, it just can't be turned on. I'm going to delete it anyway, however.
Hope this points the way to solutions for some of the rest of you!
Cheers!
Keith -
I have a Adobe CC Photography plan and I would like to Upgrade for the Complete plan, What should I do? my account is Brazilian
Adobe only sell the latest version of Creative Suite which is CS6 so you can't buy CS5 anymore. Upgrades are also only available from CS5 to CS6 so CS3 wouldn't qualify anyway.
I'm afraid you are out of luck. -
I'm no longer eligible to upgrade to the Edge plan now for 6 months???
I made a partial payment of $200 on a past due account on a Friday night, I have 6 smartphones on 12 GB plan. Financial Services is closed over weekend, I'm a pro at that by now, and I decided to wait until Monday. On Monday, my phones were already shut off. I called immediately and paid the remainder of the past due and explained that it was my fault for not contacting them sooner. They pretty much dismissed my reason, charged me the additional $90 reconnection fee, and restored services.
Three days later, I'm in Verizon and wanting to upgrade 2 of the lines to the new Edge plan and buy 2 iPhone 5c's. All's good and then, NO! YOU CAN"T DO THAT!!!??? What? Why?
Your lines were temporarily interrupted and you are no longer eligible for upgrade to the EDGE plan for 6 months. I asked them to reconsider this as I have no history of service interruptions and good payment history. They say there's nothing they can do for me, sorry.
I talk to AT&T about the new plans they offer and they're more than happy to set me up with 2 lines of service, bill credits, etc. so I call Verizon to see if there is any way to avoid me dropping accounts as they come due. They act surprised that I would consider switching carriers, but I explained I'm paying too much per month and it's not like it's appreciated anyway. I'm willing to stay with Verizon, but just wanted to switch plans to save a little bit of money.
I'm not asking for much, maybe a free pass on failing to set up a payment arrangement, but nothing else. They're unwilling to work with me and now I'm going to have to keep switching carriers as the contracts expire. And all because they can't pretend to work with me.
Is it just me? Am I being unfair of the situation?
Thanks for letting me rant!Well, I've resolved the problem, kinda.
I uninstalled Flash CS5 and AE CS5 last night, then reinstalled them. I then opened one of the AE files with the "junk" SWF in it, and nothing had changed.
I then tried to import one of the questionalbe SWFs into AE on another machine and the same problem. But I could import a SWF made on that machine into AE (running on that system).
Then I brought that SWF back to my system, and was able to successfully imported it into AE. I then imported one of the questionable SWFs made before the software reinstall, and got the 72px black square. So I opened the FLA made a new SWF and happened to move it to the desktop. I was able to successfully import that SWF.
This is where it gets weird. I then made a new SWF and left it in the local folder with the FLA and tried to import it. black box again. I then drag-copied that SWF back to the desktop and I was able to import that.
So at the moment, it seems to have something to do with the location of the SWF in relation to the AE file? That's the best that I can figure at the moment. Though I'm not sure why this would, or should, be a factor. I wish I had tried this before doing all the software uninstall/reinstalls… but I never would have thought that it could have been an issue.
Thanks again for your prompt input yesterday.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Sender Mail Adapter ASMA issue - due to limitation of length upto 200 only.
Hi, I have a scenario where i have to pull the emails from the mail server using sender mail adpater with XIPAYLOAD as message protocol. Also i am setting the "Set Adapter Setting Messgae Attributes" for retrieving values form header such as SHeaderC
-
Plumtree ob dispatcher service error - while starting the service
Could not start the plumtree job dispatcher service service on local computer Error 1069: The service did not stsrt due to a logon failure
-
I followed the instructions on the Web site to uninstall Photo shop elements 12 in windows 8.1 and when I did as it said there was no box to tick for deactivation so I carried on.. Can I just go ahead and install on another computer ?
-
Problem in client export and import (SCC8)
Hi, I was asked to copy client 300 data on one AIX server to client 210 on another AIX server. I have done the client export thru SCC8, transferred those files to other server thru ftp, added those requests to the import queue on target server. As an
-
Internet Explorer 10 problem, Windows 8
on my start screen, internet explorer works, but when i pin it to the taskbar, the one on the task bar does not work. When i click on the one on the task bar, internet explorer pops up and everything seems fine, but there is no website. The page is j