Different plan for same SQL in different version of DB

Hello,
At client side i have upgraded database from 11.2.0.1.0 to 11.2.0.2.0 . and after that i am facing performance related issue.
is this happen because of up-gradation ?
for testing i have created two different version db (i.e 11.2.0.1.0 to 11.2.0.2.0 ) with same volume and same parameter. now i am executing same query then i am getting different plan.
please help me to resolve this issue..

Which issue? CBO is upgraded with every new release! So, yes, execution plans may change because of that.
And sensible DBA's first upgrade a test database.
Also no statement is to be seen.
Secondly, you can always set optimizer_features_enable to the lower release.
Finally, please look up 'upgradation' in an English dictionary. You won't find it!!!
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Similar Messages

  • Different 'execution plans' for same sql in 10R2

    DB=10.2.0.5
    OS=RHEL 3
    Im not sure of this, but seeing different plans for same SQL.
    select sql_text from v$sqlarea where sql_id='92mb4z83fg4st'; <---TOP SQL from AWR
    SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ENDUSERID","LASTLOGINATTEMPTTIMESTAMP","LOGINSOURCECD","LOGINSUCCESSFLG",
    "ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORYID","VERSION_NUM","CREATEDATE"
    FROM "BOMB"."ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY" "ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY";
    SQL> set autotrace traceonly
    SQL> SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ENDUSERID","LASTLOGINATTEMPTTIMESTAMP","LOGINSOURCECD","LOGINSUCCESSFLG",
    "ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORYID","VERSION_NUM","CREATEDATE"
    FROM "BOMB"."ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY" "ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY"; 2 3
    1822203 rows selected.
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 568996432
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1803K| 75M| 2919 (2)| 00:00:36 |
    | 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY | 1803K| 75M| 2919 (2)| 00:00:36 |
    Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    133793 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    76637183 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    1336772 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    121482 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    1822203 rows processed
    ===================================== another plan ===============
    SQL> select * from TABLE(dbms_xplan.display_awr('92mb4z83fg4st'));
    15 rows selected.
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3015018810
    | Id | Operation | Name |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | |
    | 1 | COLLECTION ITERATOR PICKLER FETCH| DISPLAY_AWR |
    Note
    - rule based optimizer used (consider using cbo)
    Statistics
    24 recursive calls
    24 db block gets
    49 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    1529 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    492 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    15 rows processed
    =========second one shows only 15 rows...
    Which one is correct ?

    Understood, second plan is for self 'dbms_xplan'.
    Anyhow I opened a new session where I did NOT on 'auto-trace'. but plan is somewhat than the original.
    SQL> /
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    SQL_ID 92mb4z83fg4st
    SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ENDUSERID","LASTLOGINATTEMPTTIMESTAMP","LOGINSOURCECD","
    LOGINSUCCESSFLG","ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORYID","VERSION_NUM","CREATEDATE" FROM
    "BOMB"."ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY" "ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY"
    Plan hash value: 568996432
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 2919 (100)| |
    | 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY | 1803K| 75M| 2919 (2)| 00:00:36 |
    15 rows selected.
    I am just wondering, which plan is the accurate and which I need to believe ?

  • How to Maintain two different prices for same material in different qty?

    Dear all,
    How to maintain two different prices for same material in different batch quantities in purchase order(ie.,info record)?
    (Vendor is supplying quantities in 2 different batches & also in different prices)
    Expecting valuable reply.
    Jeyakanthan

    In a PO you can create 2 items, and each item can be maintained with a different price in the conditions.
    In info record it is not possible to have different prices for the same period, except for scales.
    so if you have a price of e.g. 2 USD for 1000 kg and 1,90 USD for 2000 kg then you can maintain this in scales, but you still have to have 2 items in the PO so that each one can individually find its price.
    Alternative you can create contracts (as well with more than one item) to reflect the different prices and batches.

  • How to maintain different prices for same item in different organizations

    hi all,
    We have noticed that the list price of an item at Item Validation Org level is getting defaulted when creating requisitions. We want to maintain different prices for the item for different organizations, so that the prices will be properly defaulted to requsitions depending on supplier and receiving org.
    We found one way of doing this. Using contract purchase agreement and Advanced Pricing price lists. Can anyone please let us know if there is any other way of achieving this??
    Also, I have a question regarding Advanced pricing Price Lists. I performed following steps.
    1.Set the QP: Licensed for Product profile to Purchasing
    2.Create and approve a contract purchase agreement in Oracle Purchasing
    3.Define Price Lists and Price List Lines (optional)
    4.Define sourcing rules and ASLs to automatically default source information onto requisition lines. Associate Contract to ASL.
    5. This will enable Oracle Advanced Pricing integration in the following Oracle Purchasing functionality:
    Requisition pricing
    Purchase order pricing
    But when I create requisitions, the price from price list is not getting defaulted automatically. In requisitions form, if I go to source tab and select source as a Contract Purchase Agreement, then the price from price lists is getting defaulted. Is there any way where the source for the requisition can be automatically defaulted to Contract and the price can be picked from price lists??

    Can oyu not make it an organization level item and specify the proce there instead of keeping it a master level item?
    Regards,
    Utsav.

  • Different results for same query on different servers

    1. database being converted from 7.3.4 to 9.2
    2. query is executed on both servers
    3. different results!
    The tables and data are the same, and indexes are setup on new server. EXPLAIN PLAN was run on both but with (predictably) widely different results.
    I know, not much detail here, but has anyone ever ran into anything like this?
    Thanks,
    Pat

    Folks,
    Here is the relevant information for this problem. The attributes have been changed for confidentiality. If you need any other information let me know.
    Thanks,
    Pat
    Query:
    SELECT
    one,two,three,four,a.five,six,seven,
    a.eight,a.nine,
    to_char(ten,'99999.99'),to_char(eleven,'99999.99'),
    to_char(twelve,'99999.99'),to_char(thirteen,'99999.99'),
    fourteen,fifteen,sixteen,seventeen,eighteen,
    nineteen,twenty,twentyone
    FROM
    table1 a,
    table2 b
    WHERE
    a.five = b.five
    AND one = 'X'
    AND six = ' '
    AND three != 12345
    AND three IN
    (SELECT DISTINCT
    three
    FROM table3
    WHERE
    one = 'X'
    AND twentytwo = 'XYZ'
    AND twentythree != 0
    AND twentyfour != 0
    AND twentyfive = 'Y'
    AND (a.five IN
    (SELECT DISTINCT
    five
    FROM table1
    WHERE
    one = 'X'
    AND three IN (12345)
    Table1:
    one          varchar2(1)     not null     PK
    two          varchar2(20)     not null     PK
    three          number(5)     not null     PK
    four          number(2)     not null     PK
    five          number(6)     not null     PK
    six          varchar2(4)     not null     PK
    seven          number(4)     not null
    eight          varchar2(8)     not null
    nine          date          not null
    ten          number(7,2)
    eleven     number(7,2)
    twelve     number(7,2)
    thirteen     number(7,2)
    Table2:
    five          number(6)     not null     PK
    fourteen     varchar2(5)     not null
    fifteen     varchar2(5)     not null
    sixteen     varchar2(2)     not null
    seventeen     varchar2(35)     not null
    eighteen     varchar2(4)     not null
    nineteen     varchar2(2)
    twenty     varchar2(1)
    twentyone     number(6)
    Table3:
    one          varchar2(1)     not null     PK
    twentytwo     varchar2(12)     not null     PK
    two          varchar2(20)     not null     PK
    three          number(5)     not null     PK
    four          number(2)     not null     PK
    twentysix     number(2)     not null     PK
    twentyfive     varchar2(1)     not null
    nine          date          not null
    twentythree     number(13,8)     not null
    twentyfour     number(12,8)     not null
    twentyseven     varchar2(1)     not null
    eight          varchar2(8)     not null
    Explain - Oracle9i (default, with CBO):
    SELECT STATEMENT
    RECURSIVE EXECUTION SYS_LE_3_0
    RECURSIVE EXECUTION SYS_LE_3_1
    TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION
    HASH JOIN
    HASH JOIN
    HASH JOIN
    TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_AB874A
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
    BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS
    BITMAP AND
    BITMAP MERGE
    BITMAP KEY ITERATION
    TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_AB874A
    BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
    INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
    BITMAP MERGE
    BITMAP KEY ITERATION
    TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6602_AB874A
    BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
    INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX04
    TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6602_AB874A
    TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE2
    Query results - Oracle9i (with CBO):
    X|A | 1| 0| 22| | 1|08-MAR-02|XYZ | | 24.00| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
    X|B | 2| 1| 22| | 7|04-DEC-01|XYZ | | 3.25| 8.00| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
    X|C | 3| 1| 22| | 1|14-AUG-02|XYZ | | 10.35| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
    X|D | 4| 1| 22| | 6|11-JUL-02|XYZ | | .00| 13.90| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
    X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
    X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
    X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
    X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
    X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
    (approximately 4550 rows returned)
    Explain - Oracle9i (ALTER SESSION SET OPTIMIZER_METHOD=RULE;):
    SELECT STATEMENT
    MERGE JOIN
    SORT JOIN
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    VIEW VW_NSO_1
    SORT UNIQUE
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE3
    INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE3INDEXPK
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
    INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE2
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN TABLE2INDEXPK
    SORT JOIN
    VIEW VW_NSO_2
    SORT UNIQUE
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
    INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
    Explain - Oracle 7.3.4:
    SELECT STATEMENT
    MERGE JOIN
    SORT JOIN
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    VIEW
    SORT UNIQUE
    TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE3
    INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE3INDEX03
    TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE1
    INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
    TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE2
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN TABLE2INDEXPK
    SORT JOIN
    VIEW
    SORT UNIQUE
    TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE1
    INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
    Query results - Oracle 7.3.4:
    X|A | 1| 0| 22| | 1|08-MAR-02|XYZ | | 24.00| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
    X|B | 2| 1| 22| | 7|04-DEC-01|XYZ | | 3.25| 8.00| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
    X|C | 3| 1| 22| | 1|14-AUG-02|XYZ | | 10.35| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
    X|D | 4| 1| 22| | 6|11-JUL-02|XYZ | | .00| 13.90| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
    X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
    (approximately 1150 rows returned)
    Indexes (used):
    TABLE1INDEX03     (three)
    TABLE1INDEX04     (five)
    TABLE2INDEXPK     (five)
    TABLE3INDEXPK     (one,twentytwo,two,three,four,twentysix)
    Discussion:
    Notice the repeating result for X,E,5,5,23,.... in the Oracle9i retrieval using CBO.
    The execution of this query returned approximately four times the number of rows as
    Oracle 7.3.4 using RBO. This is a function of how many "fours" there are in table3
    that have matching "threes and fours" in table1. If you put a DISTINCT clause at the
    very front of the query (SELECT DISTINCT one,two,three ....) then the result is
    accurate and the same as Oracle 7.3.4. In one execution of this query, 27,000 rows
    are expected to be returned, but the server returned over 1 million rows!
    When RBO was used on Oracle9i, the results were identical to the ones on Oracle 7.3.4.

  • CBO generating different plans for the same data in similar Environments

    Hi All
    I have been trying to compare an SQL from 2 different but similar environments build of the same hardware specs .The issue I am facing is environment A, the query executes in less than 2 minutes with plan mostly showing full table scans and hash join whereas in environment B(problematic), it times out after 2 hours with an error of unable to extend table space . The statistics are up to date in both environments for both tables and indexes . System parameters are exactly similar(default oracle for except for multiblock_read_count ).
    Both Environment have same db parameter for db_file_multiblock_read_count(16), optimizer(refer below),hash_area_size (131072),pga_aggregate_target(1G),db_block_size(8192) etc . SREADTIM, MREADTIM, CPUSPEED, MBRC are all null in aux_stats in both environment because workload was never collected i believe.
    Attached is details about the SQL with table stats, SQL and index stats my main concern is CBO generating different plans for the similar data and statistics and same hardware and software specs. Is there any thing else I should consider .I generally see environment B being very slow and always plans tend to nested loops and index scan whereas what we really need is a sensible FTS in many cases. One of the very surprising thing is METER_CONFIG_HEADER below which has just 80 blocks of data is being asked for index scan.
    show parameter optimizer
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
    optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
    optimizer_index_caching integer 0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
    optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
    optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
    **Environment**
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE     10.2.0.4.0     Production
    TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    Note: : There are slight difference in the no of records in the attached sheet.However, I wanted to tell that i have tested with exact same data and was getting similar results but I couldn't retain the data untill collecting the details in the attachment
    TEST1     COMPARE TABLE LEVE STATS  used by CBO          
    ENVIRONMENT A
    TABLE_NAME     NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS     LAST_ANALYZED
    ASSET     3607425     167760     5/02/2013 22:11
    METER_CONFIG_HEADER     3658     80     5/01/2013 0:07
    METER_CONFIG_ITEM     32310     496     5/01/2013 0:07
    NMI     1899024     33557     18/02/2013 10:55
    REGISTER     4830153     101504     18/02/2013 9:57
    SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     1607456     19137     18/02/2013 15:48
    SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     5110781     78691     18/02/2013 9:56
    SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     1425890     42468     18/02/2013 13:54
    ENVIRONMENT B
    TABLE_NAME     NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS     LAST_ANALYZED
    ASSET     4133939     198570     16/02/2013 10:02
    METER_CONFIG_HEADER     3779     80     16/02/2013 10:55
    METER_CONFIG_ITEM     33720     510     16/02/2013 10:55
    NMI     1969000     33113     16/02/2013 10:58
    REGISTER     5837874     120104     16/02/2013 11:05
    SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     1788152     22325     16/02/2013 11:06
    SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     6101934     91088     16/02/2013 11:07
    SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     1447589     43804     16/02/2013 11:11
    TEST ITEM 2     COMPARE INDEX STATS  used by CBO          
    ENVIRONMENT A
    TABLE_NAME     INDEX_NAME     UNIQUENESS     BLEVEL     LEAF_BLOCKS     DISTINCT_KEYS     AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     CLUSTERING_FACTOR     NUM_ROWS
    ASSET     IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     9878     67     147     12982     869801     3553095
    ASSET     IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     7291     2747     2     639     1755977     3597916
    ASSET     SYS_C00102592     UNIQUE     2     12488     3733831     1     1     3726639     3733831
    METER_CONFIG_HEADER     SYS_C0092052     UNIQUE     1     12     3670     1     1     3590     3670
    METER_CONFIG_ITEM     SYS_C0092074     UNIQUE     1     104     32310     1     1     32132     32310
    NMI     IDX_NMI_ID     NONUNIQUE     2     6298     844853     1     2     1964769     1965029
    NMI     IDX_NMI_ID_NK     NONUNIQUE     2     6701     1923072     1     1     1922831     1923084
    NMI     IDX_NMI_STATS     NONUNIQUE     1     106     4     26     52     211     211
    REGISTER     REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM     NONUNIQUE     2     12498     795     15     2899     2304831     4711808
    REGISTER     SYS_C00102653     UNIQUE     2     16942     5065660     1     1     5056855     5065660
    SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3667     1607968     1     1     1607689     1607982
    SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SDP_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3811     668727     1     2     1606204     1607982
    SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     SYS_C00102665     UNIQUE     2     5116     1529606     1     1     1528136     1529606
    SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     SYS_C00102677     UNIQUE     2     17370     5193638     1     1     5193623     5193638
    SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4406     676523     1     2     1423247     1425890
    SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     7374     676523     1     2     1458238     1461108
    SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     SYS_C00102687     UNIQUE     2     4737     1416207     1     1     1415022     1416207
    ENVIRONMENT B
    TABLE_NAME     INDEX_NAME     UNIQUENESS     BLEVEL     LEAF_BLOCKS     DISTINCT_KEYS     AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     CLUSTERING_FACTOR     NUM_ROWS
    ASSET     IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     8606     121     71     16428     1987833     4162257
    ASSET     IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     8432     1780146     1     1     2048170     4162257
    ASSET     SYS_C00116157     UNIQUE     2     13597     4162263     1     1     4158759     4162263
    METER_CONFIG_HEADER     SYS_C00116570     UNIQUE     1     12     3779     1     1     3734     3779
    METER_CONFIG_ITEM     SYS_C00116592     UNIQUE     1     107     33720     1     1     33459     33720
    NMI     IDX_NMI_ID     NONUNIQUE     2     6319     683370     1     2     1970460     1971313
    NMI     IDX_NMI_ID_NK     NONUNIQUE     2     6597     1971293     1     1     1970771     1971313
    NMI     IDX_NMI_STATS     NONUNIQUE     1     98     48     2     4     196     196
    REGISTER     REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM     NONUNIQUE     2     15615     1273     12     2109     2685924     5886582
    REGISTER     SYS_C00116748     UNIQUE     2     19533     5886582     1     1     5845565     5886582
    SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4111     1795084     1     1     1758441     1795130
    SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SDP_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4003     674249     1     2     1787987     1795130
    SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     SYS_C004520     UNIQUE     2     5864     1795130     1     1     1782147     1795130
    SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     SYS_C004539     UNIQUE     2     20413     6152850     1     1     6073059     6152850
    SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3227     660649     1     2     1422572     1447803
    SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     6399     646257     1     2     1346948     1349993
    SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     SYS_C00128706     UNIQUE     2     4643     1447946     1     1     1442796     1447946
    TEST ITEM 3     COMPARE PLANS     
    ENVIRONMENT A
    Plan hash value: 4109575732                                             
    | Id  | Operation                       | Name                   | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |                                             
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                        |    13 |  2067 |       |   135K  (2)| 00:27:05 |                                             
    |   1 |  HASH UNIQUE                    |                        |    13 |  2067 |       |   135K  (2)| 00:27:05 |                                             
    |*  2 |   HASH JOIN                     |                        |    13 |  2067 |       |   135K  (2)| 00:27:05 |                                             
    |*  3 |    HASH JOIN                    |                        |     6 |   900 |       |   135K  (2)| 00:27:04 |                                             
    |*  4 |     HASH JOIN ANTI              |                        |     1 |   137 |       |   135K  (2)| 00:27:03 |                                             
    |*  5 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| NMI                    |     1 |    22 |       |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |                                             
    |   6 |       NESTED LOOPS              |                        |     1 |   131 |       | 95137   (2)| 00:19:02 |                                             
    |*  7 |        HASH JOIN                |                        |     1 |   109 |       | 95132   (2)| 00:19:02 |                                             
    |*  8 |         TABLE ACCESS FULL       | ASSET                  | 36074 |  1021K|       | 38553   (2)| 00:07:43 |                                             
    |*  9 |         HASH JOIN               |                        | 90361 |  7059K|  4040K| 56578   (2)| 00:11:19 |                                             
    |* 10 |          HASH JOIN              |                        | 52977 |  3414K|  2248K| 50654   (2)| 00:10:08 |                                             
    |* 11 |           HASH JOIN             |                        | 39674 |  1782K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |                                             
    |* 12 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL    | REGISTER               | 39439 |  1232K|       | 22584   (2)| 00:04:32 |                                             
    |* 13 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL    | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   |  4206K|    56M|       | 17490   (2)| 00:03:30 |                                             
    |* 14 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL     | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT |   675K|    12M|       |  9412   (2)| 00:01:53 |                                             
    |* 15 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL      | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET      |  1178K|    15M|       |  4262   (2)| 00:00:52 |                                             
    |* 16 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN         | IDX_NMI_ID_NK          |     2 |       |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |                                             
    |  17 |      VIEW                       |                        | 39674 |   232K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |                                             
    |* 18 |       HASH JOIN                 |                        | 39674 |  1046K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |                                             
    |* 19 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL        | REGISTER               | 39439 |   500K|       | 22584   (2)| 00:04:32 |                                             
    |* 20 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL        | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   |  4206K|    56M|       | 17490   (2)| 00:03:30 |                                             
    |* 21 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL           | METER_CONFIG_HEADER    |  3658 | 47554 |       |    19   (0)| 00:00:01 |                                             
    |* 22 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL            | METER_CONFIG_ITEM      |  7590 | 68310 |       |   112   (2)| 00:00:02 |                                             
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):                                             
       2 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")                                             
       3 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")                                             
       4 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")                                             
       5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))                                             
       7 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD" AND "SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")                                             
       8 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                             
       9 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")                                             
      10 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")                                             
      11 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")                                             
      12 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR                                              
                  SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                             
      13 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                             
      14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                             
      15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                             
      16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")                                             
      18 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")                                             
      19 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR                                              
                  SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                             
      20 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                             
      21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                             
      22 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')                                             
    ENVIRONMENT B
    Plan hash value: 2826260434                                   
    | Id  | Operation                            | Name                   | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |                                   
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K  (2)| 00:20:47 |                                   
    |   1 |  HASH UNIQUE                         |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K  (2)| 00:20:47 |                                   
    |*  2 |   HASH JOIN ANTI                     |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K  (2)| 00:20:47 |                                   
    |*  3 |    HASH JOIN                         |                        |     1 |   176 | 56855   (2)| 00:11:23 |                                   
    |*  4 |     HASH JOIN                        |                        |     1 |   163 | 36577   (2)| 00:07:19 |                                   
    |*  5 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     | ASSET                  |     1 |    44 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |                                   
    |   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                   |                        |     1 |   131 |  9834   (2)| 00:01:59 |                                   
    |   7 |        NESTED LOOPS                  |                        |     1 |    87 |  9830   (2)| 00:01:58 |                                   
    |   8 |         NESTED LOOPS                 |                        |     1 |    74 |  9825   (2)| 00:01:58 |                                   
    |*  9 |          HASH JOIN                   |                        |     1 |    52 |  9820   (2)| 00:01:58 |                                   
    |* 10 |           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| METER_CONFIG_HEADER    |     1 |    14 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |                                   
    |  11 |            NESTED LOOPS              |                        |     1 |    33 |   116   (2)| 00:00:02 |                                   
    |* 12 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL        | METER_CONFIG_ITEM      |     1 |    19 |   115   (2)| 00:00:02 |                                   
    |* 13 |             INDEX RANGE SCAN         | SYS_C00116570          |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |                                   
    |* 14 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL          | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT |   723K|    13M|  9699   (2)| 00:01:57 |                                   
    |* 15 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | NMI                    |     1 |    22 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |                                   
    |* 16 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IDX_NMI_ID_NK          |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |                                   
    |* 17 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET      |     1 |    13 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |                                   
    |* 18 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN            | IDX_SLA_SDP_SK         |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |                                   
    |* 19 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN              | IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK  |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |                                   
    |* 20 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | REGISTER               | 76113 |  2378K| 26743   (2)| 00:05:21 |                                   
    |* 21 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL                | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   |  5095K|    63M| 20245   (2)| 00:04:03 |                                   
    |  22 |    VIEW                              |                        | 90889 |   443K| 47021   (2)| 00:09:25 |                                   
    |* 23 |     HASH JOIN                        |                        | 90889 |  2307K| 47021   (2)| 00:09:25 |                                   
    |* 24 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | REGISTER               | 76113 |   966K| 26743   (2)| 00:05:21 |                                   
    |* 25 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   |  5095K|    63M| 20245   (2)| 00:04:03 |                                   
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):                                   
       2 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")                                   
       3 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK" AND                                    
                  "SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")                                   
       4 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD")                                   
       5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                   
       9 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")                                   
      10 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                   
      12 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')                                   
      13 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")                                   
      14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                   
      15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))                                   
      16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")                                   
      17 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                   
      18 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")                                   
      19 - access("SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")                                   
      20 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR                                    
                  SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                   
      21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                   
      23 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")                                   
      24 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR                                    
                  SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')                                   
      25 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:16 PM
    Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:18 PM

    Hi Paul,
    I misread your question initially .The system stats are outdated in both ( same result as seen from aux_stats) .I am not a DBA and do not have access to gather system stats fresh.
    select * from sys.aux_stats$
    SNAME     PNAME     PVAL1     PVAL2
    SYSSTATS_INFO     STATUS     NULL     COMPLETED
    SYSSTATS_INFO     DSTART     NULL     02-16-2011 15:24
    SYSSTATS_INFO     DSTOP     NULL     02-16-2011 15:24
    SYSSTATS_INFO     FLAGS     1     NULL
    SYSSTATS_MAIN     CPUSPEEDNW     1321.20523     NULL
    SYSSTATS_MAIN     IOSEEKTIM     10     NULL
    SYSSTATS_MAIN     IOTFRSPEED     4096     NULL
    SYSSTATS_MAIN     SREADTIM     NULL     NULL
    SYSSTATS_MAIN     MREADTIM     NULL     NULL
    SYSSTATS_MAIN     CPUSPEED     NULL     NULL
    SYSSTATS_MAIN     MBRC     NULL     NULL
    SYSSTATS_MAIN     MAXTHR     NULL     NULL
    SYSSTATS_MAIN     SLAVETHR     NULL     NULL

  • Using different templates for the desktop and phone versions of the same blog

    I have a site which was created in Adobe Muse and is hosted on Business Catalyst.
    I have created both a desktop and a phone versions of the site.
    I  want to know how I can integrate the blogs that I  currently have on the desktop site with the phone version that I just did, using different templates for the desktop and phone versions of the same blog. This is in order to ensure that visitors to the blogs on the website are directed to the templates that render correctly for the devices they are using.
    My current approach has been to create both a desktop and phone versions of the blogs. The problem with this however, is that the dates are different and the comments are separated between the two blog versions!
    I  have also tried enabling mobile templates in BC, but still couldn't find a way to specify the mobile versions of the templates for the same blog?
    To recap my problem, I basically  need a solution where the same blog uses different templates for desktop and mobile (both templates use different navigation headings and menu styles)
    Thanks.

    There can be few reason for this, including page contents links or contents used in phone/tablet version.
    Please provide the site url , also try to publish the site as a trial site in Business Catalyst with all layouts which would help to isolate the issue.
    Thanks,
    Sanjit

  • Different Schemas in different environments for same tables used in a Universe

    Hi,
    I have a Universe in Development where I have tables pointed to a schema (DW) in DEV but in TEST/INT I have the same tables under a different schema (TESTDW). So when I promote the Universe & reports from DEV to TEST, I will be getting errors as the schema is incorrect. So we need to find a way so that we can define the schema globally instead of having it at the individual table.
    I know we can repoint the schemas, etc but i need to avoid extra work in other environments.
    Known Solutions: Promote the reports to TEST, then select all the tables & change the schema by Right Clicking the selected tables and selecting Change Qualifier/Owner.
    One of the few reasons, I don't want to follow this route, because I have lot of derived tables which I need to change it manually by editing the SQL Statement,  &  also If I add new tables or columns again in future & promote them to TEST, then again I have to change the schema.
    Did anyone faced this kind of issue?Is there any other way that we can use like Begin_Sql , etc?
    (FYI, I am using BO4.0 SP5)

    Mark, Thanks a lot for your concern. We actually have same schema name across all 3 environments but there is a huge project going on in my company which is kind of hard to explain, so our team has decided to go ahead with a different names for schemas as 2 different teams will be working on paralelly on these schemas & they will combine them after a year or so. (I know this is not a solution)
    Thanks Swapnil for Synonyms solution. Your solution might have worked, if we were using BO 4.1 SP5 but unfortunately we are using BO 4.0 and in this version I can't view any synonym tables in the universe.

  • How to generate single move order for same components amongs different job using component pick release

    Hi all,
           I am new in manufacturing and we want to implement functionality of generating single move order for same component among different job using component pick release. Can any one help in this.
    we are using oracle R 12.1.3 version.
          For example. We create finish good XYZ which is build in WIP item. We create discrete jobs for XYZ suppose JOB1,JOB2,JOB3 multiple job we can create for XYZ item. in these JOB suppose component abc is similar with 5 quantity. so our goal is to generate 1 move order for all three JOBS with 15 quantity of abc component.
    please help me to achieve this goal. Immediate  Reply will be appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards
    user11152750

    PranitSaha
            Thanks For your reply. Can you please tell me in detail how can I group as I am new. How using MRP we can group same component from different job in single move order for delivering that component to shop floor.
    Thank you..

  • Different View for same document library on a Wiki Page

    Hi,
    I am developing a Provided hosted app which have a functionality to create a document library with two Views. Also we need to show this document library in a wiki page with two different views.
    I am using CSOM (C#). I am able to create the document library and the two views programmatically. But when I add the document library in the wiki page the default view (All Documents) is shown for both the web parts. There is an hidden view created with
    the WebPartDefinition from the xml provided through code. 
    Through CSOM we are able make a View as default with the link below.
    http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/90433/add-document-library-xsltlistviewwebpart-using-csom-or-web-services
    In my case both the webparts will get the same view, where I need different view for same document library in a wiki page.
    Also I tried to update the web parts with the following code.
    string viewString = @"<View Name='{0}' MobileView='TRUE' Type='HTML' Url='/SitePages/Home.aspx' Level='1' BaseViewID='1' ContentTypeID='0x' ImageUrl='/_layouts/15/images/dlicon.png?rev=23' >
    <Query><Where><Eq><FieldRef Name='KeyDocument'/><Value Type='Boolean'>1</Value></Eq></Where></Query>
    <ViewFields><FieldRef Name='FileLeafRef'/><FieldRef Name='DocumentOwner'/><FieldRef Name='Modified'/>
    <FieldRef Name='_UIVersionString'/><FieldRef Name='Editor'/></ViewFields>
    <RowLimit Paged='TRUE'>30</RowLimit><JSLink>clienttemplates.js</JSLink><XslLink Default='TRUE'>main.xsl</XslLink>
    <Toolbar Type='Standard'/></View>";
    WebPartDefinition wpd = wpfound.FirstOrDefault();
    string formattedstring = String.Format(viewString, wpd.Id);
    wpd.WebPart.Properties["XmlDefinition"] = formattedstring;
    wpd.SaveWebPartChanges();
    web.Context.ExecuteQuery();
    I created two views (viewString) as shown above.
    The above code did not throw error, but it did not update the web part.
    Please advise how to move forward.

    Hi Samir,
    When we click outside of the list view webpart on a webpart page (or allitems.aspx page) with containing multiple webparts, the list view webpart will lose the focus, and the selected items will be deselected, this is by design.
    You can look at the following article with using the approach/workaround of Javascript to prevent the specified list view webpart from losing focus.
    http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/44360/list-view-loses-focus-when-additional-webpart-added-to-page
    //Set focus on our list web part
    var webPart = document.getElementById('WebPartWPQ1');
    WpClick({target: webPart});
    //Prevent it from losing focus
    SP.Ribbon.WebPartComponent.$3_1.deselectWebPartAndZone = function() { };
    Thanks
    Daniel Yang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Create wip jobs for same item with different routings.

    My scenario is , i am having 2 production lines for the same End item. If both lines are available to use, then WIP jobs have to be created for both lines. If either one is available then WIP job has to be created only for that line. Please suggest the setups for this. This way i can increase the production rate.

    HI Jey-2013,
    In your organization, you first need to define Bills and Routings for the item/items.  Now to use two routings for 1 item, you need to define Alternate Routing.
    For that go to BOM>Setup> Alternates and create an Alternate name for the second routing.
    Then Go again to BOM>routing and use the Alternate name for the item to create a different Routing. After that you will have two different routings for same item.
    Whenever you create a job in WIP, you will have an option to choose either the default or the original routing. This way you can accomplish your goal of using different routings as and when required. Hope this helps you. Kindly let me know
    Regards,
    Bhargav

  • How to make Different Price for same product in one Sale Order

    How can i customizing my system?
    I need to sale for different price same product A in one sale order. And price condition type cant be manually. i can separate them by position. for ex. in first position: product A is one price and in 2nd product A with discount. i tried to do it by changing a price group for 2nd position to determinate a discount condition but it generates invoice split.
    Someone have any suggestions?

    Hi
    you can have it automatically determined after some custo and using userexit_pricing_prepare_tkomp in MV45AFZZ and RV60AFZZ.
    The idea is to use ítem category field (PSTYV) as a part of pricing data to determine different prices for same material by changing manually ítem category when creating a sales order
    - you'll need to create a new ítem category copied from the one you´re using and do all assignments
    - add field PSTYV, if not there, to pricing field catalog. This thread has an example on how to and coding required for userexits
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/1693234
    - Adjust your pricing sequence as per new table
    - Maintain specific prices in new table for materials with this new ítem category
    Finally, when creating a sales order change, when required, default ítem category by new one to get specific price for material.
    Regards,
    JM

  • Folder is empty on second computer. I have installed adobe CC on two different computers for same account so I can work at two different places. I uploaded files to it yesterday and I can't find it on the CC folder on second computer. What can I do?

    I have installed adobe CC on two different computers for same account so I can work at two different places. I uploaded files to it yesterday and I can't find it on the CC folder on second computer. What can I do?

    Hi DeafScientist,
    Please try the below mentioned links.
    Creative Cloud Help | Browse, sync, and manage assets
    Error: "Unable to sync files"
    Creative Cloud File Sync | Known issues
    Kindly revert if you are unable to sync files.
    Thanks,
    Atul Saini

  • Engineering and Manufacturing Org has different name for same item

    Dear All,
    I have an Engineering department generally Create items and configure bills, routings then, transfer all to Manufacturing org.
    My client has typical requirement as follows...
    Engineering and manufacturing department has different name for same item.
    Eg: Item A in Manufacturing org may be called as Item AA in Engg org. I have to maintain 2 names for same item. How to map this requirement in R12.
    Regards,
    Saravanan

    Can oyu not make it an organization level item and specify the proce there instead of keeping it a master level item?
    Regards,
    Utsav.

  • Multiple plans for my SQL- Which one is following?-11gr2

    11gr2, windows-64-bit
    I have one sql_id part of 3rd part application, need to tune it. When I tried to get its execution plan im seeing multiple plan_plan values. That means, multiple plans for
    same sql_id
    How could we know that which plan my sql_id is following.?
    SQL> set lines 300
    SQL> set pages 50
    SQL> select * from TABLE(dbms_xplan.display_awr('5z1r29wc6514q'));
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    SQL_ID 5z1r29wc6514q
    SELECT INVOICE_ID,min(CHARGE_DATE),MAX(CHARGE_DATE),
    sum(TOTAL_EXCL_VAT),sum(case when instr(LEVEL2,:"SYS_B_0")>:"SYS_B_1"
    then SUM_QUANTITY else :"SYS_B_2" end) as KB from
    RATOR_CDR.INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE I  INNER JOIN SUBSCRIPTION S ON S.ID =
    I.SUBSCRIPTION_ID  inner join SERVICE S1 on S1.SUBSCRIPTION_ID=S.ID
    WHERE INVOICE_ID in (SELECT id from  RATOR.INVOICE WHERE
    invoice_number is  null) and  S1.PHONE_NUMBER=:1   and LEVEL1=:2  group
    by  INVOICE_ID
    Plan hash value: 216300602
    | Id  | Operation                            | Name                  | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |                       |       |       |  1350 (100)|       |          |       |
    |   1 |  HASH GROUP BY                       |                       |   333 | 40293 |  1350   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
    |   2 |   HASH JOIN                          |                       |   333 | 40293 |  1348   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                      |                       |       |       |            |       |          |       |
    |   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                     |                       |  1638 |   161K|   866   (0)| 00:00:11 |       |       |
    |   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                    |                       |     1 |    34 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   6 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | SERVICE               |     1 |    23 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   7 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN              | SERVICE__PHONE_NUMBER |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   8 |       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | SUBSCRIPTION__ID_PK   |     1 |    11 |     0   (0)|       |          |       |
    |   9 |      PARTITION RANGE ALL             |                       |  1684 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    17 |
    |  10 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN               | IDL_SUB_ID            |  1684 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    17 |
    |  11 |     TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE   |  1581 |   103K|   864   (0)| 00:00:11 |     1 |     1 |
    |  12 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | INVOICE               |  6048 |   118K|   481   (1)| 00:00:06 |       |       |
    SQL_ID 5z1r29wc6514q
    SELECT INVOICE_ID,min(CHARGE_DATE),MAX(CHARGE_DATE),
    sum(TOTAL_EXCL_VAT),sum(case when instr(LEVEL2,:"SYS_B_0")>:"SYS_B_1"
    then SUM_QUANTITY else :"SYS_B_2" end) as KB from
    RATOR_CDR.INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE I  INNER JOIN SUBSCRIPTION S ON S.ID =
    I.SUBSCRIPTION_ID  inner join SERVICE S1 on S1.SUBSCRIPTION_ID=S.ID
    WHERE INVOICE_ID in (SELECT id from  RATOR.INVOICE WHERE
    invoice_number is  null) and  S1.PHONE_NUMBER=:1   and LEVEL1=:2  group
    by  INVOICE_ID
    Plan hash value: 1282779260
    | Id  | Operation                            | Name                  | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |                       |       |       |  1392 (100)|       |          |       |
    |   1 |  HASH GROUP BY                       |                       |   325 | 39000 |  1392   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
    |   2 |   HASH JOIN                          |                       |   325 | 39000 |  1391   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
    |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | INVOICE               |  5972 |   116K|   550   (1)| 00:00:07 |       |       |
    |   4 |    NESTED LOOPS                      |                       |       |       |            |       |          |       |
    |   5 |     NESTED LOOPS                     |                       |  1794 |   175K|   840   (0)| 00:00:11 |       |       |
    |   6 |      NESTED LOOPS                    |                       |     1 |    34 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   7 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | SERVICE               |     1 |    23 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   8 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN              | SERVICE__PHONE_NUMBER |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   9 |       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | SUBSCRIPTION__ID_PK   |     1 |    11 |     0   (0)|       |          |       |
    |  10 |      PARTITION RANGE ALL             |                       |  1836 |       |    48   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    18 |
    |  11 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN               | IDL_SUB_ID            |  1836 |       |    48   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    18 |
    |  12 |     TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE   |  1722 |   110K|   838   (0)| 00:00:11 |     1 |     1 |
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------also, Any suggestions to tune this query
    Thanks

    Harry wrote:
    11gr2, windows-64-bit
    I have one sql_id part of 3rd part application, need to tune it. how do plan on modifying 3 ^rd^ party application?

Maybe you are looking for