Different plan for same SQL in different version of DB
Hello,
At client side i have upgraded database from 11.2.0.1.0 to 11.2.0.2.0 . and after that i am facing performance related issue.
is this happen because of up-gradation ?
for testing i have created two different version db (i.e 11.2.0.1.0 to 11.2.0.2.0 ) with same volume and same parameter. now i am executing same query then i am getting different plan.
please help me to resolve this issue..
Which issue? CBO is upgraded with every new release! So, yes, execution plans may change because of that.
And sensible DBA's first upgrade a test database.
Also no statement is to be seen.
Secondly, you can always set optimizer_features_enable to the lower release.
Finally, please look up 'upgradation' in an English dictionary. You won't find it!!!
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA
Similar Messages
-
Different 'execution plans' for same sql in 10R2
DB=10.2.0.5
OS=RHEL 3
Im not sure of this, but seeing different plans for same SQL.
select sql_text from v$sqlarea where sql_id='92mb4z83fg4st'; <---TOP SQL from AWR
SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ENDUSERID","LASTLOGINATTEMPTTIMESTAMP","LOGINSOURCECD","LOGINSUCCESSFLG",
"ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORYID","VERSION_NUM","CREATEDATE"
FROM "BOMB"."ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY" "ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY";
SQL> set autotrace traceonly
SQL> SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ENDUSERID","LASTLOGINATTEMPTTIMESTAMP","LOGINSOURCECD","LOGINSUCCESSFLG",
"ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORYID","VERSION_NUM","CREATEDATE"
FROM "BOMB"."ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY" "ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY"; 2 3
1822203 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 568996432
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1803K| 75M| 2919 (2)| 00:00:36 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY | 1803K| 75M| 2919 (2)| 00:00:36 |
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
133793 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
76637183 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1336772 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
121482 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1822203 rows processed
===================================== another plan ===============
SQL> select * from TABLE(dbms_xplan.display_awr('92mb4z83fg4st'));
15 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3015018810
| Id | Operation | Name |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | |
| 1 | COLLECTION ITERATOR PICKLER FETCH| DISPLAY_AWR |
Note
- rule based optimizer used (consider using cbo)
Statistics
24 recursive calls
24 db block gets
49 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1529 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
492 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
15 rows processed
=========second one shows only 15 rows...
Which one is correct ?Understood, second plan is for self 'dbms_xplan'.
Anyhow I opened a new session where I did NOT on 'auto-trace'. but plan is somewhat than the original.
SQL> /
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 92mb4z83fg4st
SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ENDUSERID","LASTLOGINATTEMPTTIMESTAMP","LOGINSOURCECD","
LOGINSUCCESSFLG","ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORYID","VERSION_NUM","CREATEDATE" FROM
"BOMB"."ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY" "ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY"
Plan hash value: 568996432
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 2919 (100)| |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ENDUSERLOGINATTEMPTHISTORY | 1803K| 75M| 2919 (2)| 00:00:36 |
15 rows selected.
I am just wondering, which plan is the accurate and which I need to believe ? -
How to Maintain two different prices for same material in different qty?
Dear all,
How to maintain two different prices for same material in different batch quantities in purchase order(ie.,info record)?
(Vendor is supplying quantities in 2 different batches & also in different prices)
Expecting valuable reply.
JeyakanthanIn a PO you can create 2 items, and each item can be maintained with a different price in the conditions.
In info record it is not possible to have different prices for the same period, except for scales.
so if you have a price of e.g. 2 USD for 1000 kg and 1,90 USD for 2000 kg then you can maintain this in scales, but you still have to have 2 items in the PO so that each one can individually find its price.
Alternative you can create contracts (as well with more than one item) to reflect the different prices and batches. -
How to maintain different prices for same item in different organizations
hi all,
We have noticed that the list price of an item at Item Validation Org level is getting defaulted when creating requisitions. We want to maintain different prices for the item for different organizations, so that the prices will be properly defaulted to requsitions depending on supplier and receiving org.
We found one way of doing this. Using contract purchase agreement and Advanced Pricing price lists. Can anyone please let us know if there is any other way of achieving this??
Also, I have a question regarding Advanced pricing Price Lists. I performed following steps.
1.Set the QP: Licensed for Product profile to Purchasing
2.Create and approve a contract purchase agreement in Oracle Purchasing
3.Define Price Lists and Price List Lines (optional)
4.Define sourcing rules and ASLs to automatically default source information onto requisition lines. Associate Contract to ASL.
5. This will enable Oracle Advanced Pricing integration in the following Oracle Purchasing functionality:
Requisition pricing
Purchase order pricing
But when I create requisitions, the price from price list is not getting defaulted automatically. In requisitions form, if I go to source tab and select source as a Contract Purchase Agreement, then the price from price lists is getting defaulted. Is there any way where the source for the requisition can be automatically defaulted to Contract and the price can be picked from price lists??Can oyu not make it an organization level item and specify the proce there instead of keeping it a master level item?
Regards,
Utsav. -
Different results for same query on different servers
1. database being converted from 7.3.4 to 9.2
2. query is executed on both servers
3. different results!
The tables and data are the same, and indexes are setup on new server. EXPLAIN PLAN was run on both but with (predictably) widely different results.
I know, not much detail here, but has anyone ever ran into anything like this?
Thanks,
PatFolks,
Here is the relevant information for this problem. The attributes have been changed for confidentiality. If you need any other information let me know.
Thanks,
Pat
Query:
SELECT
one,two,three,four,a.five,six,seven,
a.eight,a.nine,
to_char(ten,'99999.99'),to_char(eleven,'99999.99'),
to_char(twelve,'99999.99'),to_char(thirteen,'99999.99'),
fourteen,fifteen,sixteen,seventeen,eighteen,
nineteen,twenty,twentyone
FROM
table1 a,
table2 b
WHERE
a.five = b.five
AND one = 'X'
AND six = ' '
AND three != 12345
AND three IN
(SELECT DISTINCT
three
FROM table3
WHERE
one = 'X'
AND twentytwo = 'XYZ'
AND twentythree != 0
AND twentyfour != 0
AND twentyfive = 'Y'
AND (a.five IN
(SELECT DISTINCT
five
FROM table1
WHERE
one = 'X'
AND three IN (12345)
Table1:
one varchar2(1) not null PK
two varchar2(20) not null PK
three number(5) not null PK
four number(2) not null PK
five number(6) not null PK
six varchar2(4) not null PK
seven number(4) not null
eight varchar2(8) not null
nine date not null
ten number(7,2)
eleven number(7,2)
twelve number(7,2)
thirteen number(7,2)
Table2:
five number(6) not null PK
fourteen varchar2(5) not null
fifteen varchar2(5) not null
sixteen varchar2(2) not null
seventeen varchar2(35) not null
eighteen varchar2(4) not null
nineteen varchar2(2)
twenty varchar2(1)
twentyone number(6)
Table3:
one varchar2(1) not null PK
twentytwo varchar2(12) not null PK
two varchar2(20) not null PK
three number(5) not null PK
four number(2) not null PK
twentysix number(2) not null PK
twentyfive varchar2(1) not null
nine date not null
twentythree number(13,8) not null
twentyfour number(12,8) not null
twentyseven varchar2(1) not null
eight varchar2(8) not null
Explain - Oracle9i (default, with CBO):
SELECT STATEMENT
RECURSIVE EXECUTION SYS_LE_3_0
RECURSIVE EXECUTION SYS_LE_3_1
TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION
HASH JOIN
HASH JOIN
HASH JOIN
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_AB874A
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS
BITMAP AND
BITMAP MERGE
BITMAP KEY ITERATION
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_AB874A
BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
BITMAP MERGE
BITMAP KEY ITERATION
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6602_AB874A
BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX04
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6602_AB874A
TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE2
Query results - Oracle9i (with CBO):
X|A | 1| 0| 22| | 1|08-MAR-02|XYZ | | 24.00| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|B | 2| 1| 22| | 7|04-DEC-01|XYZ | | 3.25| 8.00| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|C | 3| 1| 22| | 1|14-AUG-02|XYZ | | 10.35| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|D | 4| 1| 22| | 6|11-JUL-02|XYZ | | .00| 13.90| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
(approximately 4550 rows returned)
Explain - Oracle9i (ALTER SESSION SET OPTIMIZER_METHOD=RULE;):
SELECT STATEMENT
MERGE JOIN
SORT JOIN
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
VIEW VW_NSO_1
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE3
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE3INDEXPK
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN TABLE2INDEXPK
SORT JOIN
VIEW VW_NSO_2
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
Explain - Oracle 7.3.4:
SELECT STATEMENT
MERGE JOIN
SORT JOIN
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
VIEW
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE3
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE3INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN TABLE2INDEXPK
SORT JOIN
VIEW
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
Query results - Oracle 7.3.4:
X|A | 1| 0| 22| | 1|08-MAR-02|XYZ | | 24.00| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|B | 2| 1| 22| | 7|04-DEC-01|XYZ | | 3.25| 8.00| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|C | 3| 1| 22| | 1|14-AUG-02|XYZ | | 10.35| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|D | 4| 1| 22| | 6|11-JUL-02|XYZ | | .00| 13.90| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
(approximately 1150 rows returned)
Indexes (used):
TABLE1INDEX03 (three)
TABLE1INDEX04 (five)
TABLE2INDEXPK (five)
TABLE3INDEXPK (one,twentytwo,two,three,four,twentysix)
Discussion:
Notice the repeating result for X,E,5,5,23,.... in the Oracle9i retrieval using CBO.
The execution of this query returned approximately four times the number of rows as
Oracle 7.3.4 using RBO. This is a function of how many "fours" there are in table3
that have matching "threes and fours" in table1. If you put a DISTINCT clause at the
very front of the query (SELECT DISTINCT one,two,three ....) then the result is
accurate and the same as Oracle 7.3.4. In one execution of this query, 27,000 rows
are expected to be returned, but the server returned over 1 million rows!
When RBO was used on Oracle9i, the results were identical to the ones on Oracle 7.3.4. -
CBO generating different plans for the same data in similar Environments
Hi All
I have been trying to compare an SQL from 2 different but similar environments build of the same hardware specs .The issue I am facing is environment A, the query executes in less than 2 minutes with plan mostly showing full table scans and hash join whereas in environment B(problematic), it times out after 2 hours with an error of unable to extend table space . The statistics are up to date in both environments for both tables and indexes . System parameters are exactly similar(default oracle for except for multiblock_read_count ).
Both Environment have same db parameter for db_file_multiblock_read_count(16), optimizer(refer below),hash_area_size (131072),pga_aggregate_target(1G),db_block_size(8192) etc . SREADTIM, MREADTIM, CPUSPEED, MBRC are all null in aux_stats in both environment because workload was never collected i believe.
Attached is details about the SQL with table stats, SQL and index stats my main concern is CBO generating different plans for the similar data and statistics and same hardware and software specs. Is there any thing else I should consider .I generally see environment B being very slow and always plans tend to nested loops and index scan whereas what we really need is a sensible FTS in many cases. One of the very surprising thing is METER_CONFIG_HEADER below which has just 80 blocks of data is being asked for index scan.
show parameter optimizer
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
**Environment**
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Note: : There are slight difference in the no of records in the attached sheet.However, I wanted to tell that i have tested with exact same data and was getting similar results but I couldn't retain the data untill collecting the details in the attachment
TEST1 COMPARE TABLE LEVE STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS BLOCKS LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET 3607425 167760 5/02/2013 22:11
METER_CONFIG_HEADER 3658 80 5/01/2013 0:07
METER_CONFIG_ITEM 32310 496 5/01/2013 0:07
NMI 1899024 33557 18/02/2013 10:55
REGISTER 4830153 101504 18/02/2013 9:57
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET 1607456 19137 18/02/2013 15:48
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER 5110781 78691 18/02/2013 9:56
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT 1425890 42468 18/02/2013 13:54
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS BLOCKS LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET 4133939 198570 16/02/2013 10:02
METER_CONFIG_HEADER 3779 80 16/02/2013 10:55
METER_CONFIG_ITEM 33720 510 16/02/2013 10:55
NMI 1969000 33113 16/02/2013 10:58
REGISTER 5837874 120104 16/02/2013 11:05
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET 1788152 22325 16/02/2013 11:06
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER 6101934 91088 16/02/2013 11:07
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT 1447589 43804 16/02/2013 11:11
TEST ITEM 2 COMPARE INDEX STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME UNIQUENESS BLEVEL LEAF_BLOCKS DISTINCT_KEYS AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY CLUSTERING_FACTOR NUM_ROWS
ASSET IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK NONUNIQUE 2 9878 67 147 12982 869801 3553095
ASSET IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 7291 2747 2 639 1755977 3597916
ASSET SYS_C00102592 UNIQUE 2 12488 3733831 1 1 3726639 3733831
METER_CONFIG_HEADER SYS_C0092052 UNIQUE 1 12 3670 1 1 3590 3670
METER_CONFIG_ITEM SYS_C0092074 UNIQUE 1 104 32310 1 1 32132 32310
NMI IDX_NMI_ID NONUNIQUE 2 6298 844853 1 2 1964769 1965029
NMI IDX_NMI_ID_NK NONUNIQUE 2 6701 1923072 1 1 1922831 1923084
NMI IDX_NMI_STATS NONUNIQUE 1 106 4 26 52 211 211
REGISTER REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM NONUNIQUE 2 12498 795 15 2899 2304831 4711808
REGISTER SYS_C00102653 UNIQUE 2 16942 5065660 1 1 5056855 5065660
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3667 1607968 1 1 1607689 1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SDP_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3811 668727 1 2 1606204 1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET SYS_C00102665 UNIQUE 2 5116 1529606 1 1 1528136 1529606
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER SYS_C00102677 UNIQUE 2 17370 5193638 1 1 5193623 5193638
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4406 676523 1 2 1423247 1425890
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 7374 676523 1 2 1458238 1461108
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT SYS_C00102687 UNIQUE 2 4737 1416207 1 1 1415022 1416207
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME UNIQUENESS BLEVEL LEAF_BLOCKS DISTINCT_KEYS AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY CLUSTERING_FACTOR NUM_ROWS
ASSET IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK NONUNIQUE 2 8606 121 71 16428 1987833 4162257
ASSET IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 8432 1780146 1 1 2048170 4162257
ASSET SYS_C00116157 UNIQUE 2 13597 4162263 1 1 4158759 4162263
METER_CONFIG_HEADER SYS_C00116570 UNIQUE 1 12 3779 1 1 3734 3779
METER_CONFIG_ITEM SYS_C00116592 UNIQUE 1 107 33720 1 1 33459 33720
NMI IDX_NMI_ID NONUNIQUE 2 6319 683370 1 2 1970460 1971313
NMI IDX_NMI_ID_NK NONUNIQUE 2 6597 1971293 1 1 1970771 1971313
NMI IDX_NMI_STATS NONUNIQUE 1 98 48 2 4 196 196
REGISTER REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM NONUNIQUE 2 15615 1273 12 2109 2685924 5886582
REGISTER SYS_C00116748 UNIQUE 2 19533 5886582 1 1 5845565 5886582
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4111 1795084 1 1 1758441 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SDP_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4003 674249 1 2 1787987 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET SYS_C004520 UNIQUE 2 5864 1795130 1 1 1782147 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER SYS_C004539 UNIQUE 2 20413 6152850 1 1 6073059 6152850
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3227 660649 1 2 1422572 1447803
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 6399 646257 1 2 1346948 1349993
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT SYS_C00128706 UNIQUE 2 4643 1447946 1 1 1442796 1447946
TEST ITEM 3 COMPARE PLANS
ENVIRONMENT A
Plan hash value: 4109575732
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 6 | 900 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:04 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN ANTI | | 1 | 137 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:03 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| NMI | 1 | 22 | | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 131 | | 95137 (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 109 | | 95132 (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ASSET | 36074 | 1021K| | 38553 (2)| 00:07:43 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 90361 | 7059K| 4040K| 56578 (2)| 00:11:19 |
|* 10 | HASH JOIN | | 52977 | 3414K| 2248K| 50654 (2)| 00:10:08 |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN | | 39674 | 1782K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 39439 | 1232K| | 22584 (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 4206K| 56M| | 17490 (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT | 675K| 12M| | 9412 (2)| 00:01:53 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET | 1178K| 15M| | 4262 (2)| 00:00:52 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_NMI_ID_NK | 2 | | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 17 | VIEW | | 39674 | 232K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 18 | HASH JOIN | | 39674 | 1046K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 19 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 39439 | 500K| | 22584 (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 4206K| 56M| | 17490 (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_HEADER | 3658 | 47554 | | 19 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_ITEM | 7590 | 68310 | | 112 (2)| 00:00:02 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
3 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
4 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
7 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD" AND "SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
8 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
9 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
10 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
11 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
12 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
13 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
18 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
19 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
20 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
22 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
ENVIRONMENT B
Plan hash value: 2826260434
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN ANTI | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 176 | 56855 (2)| 00:11:23 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 163 | 36577 (2)| 00:07:19 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ASSET | 1 | 44 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 131 | 9834 (2)| 00:01:59 |
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 87 | 9830 (2)| 00:01:58 |
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 74 | 9825 (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 52 | 9820 (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| METER_CONFIG_HEADER | 1 | 14 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 33 | 116 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_ITEM | 1 | 19 | 115 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 13 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C00116570 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT | 723K| 13M| 9699 (2)| 00:01:57 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | NMI | 1 | 22 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_NMI_ID_NK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET | 1 | 13 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_SLA_SDP_SK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 76113 | 2378K| 26743 (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 5095K| 63M| 20245 (2)| 00:04:03 |
| 22 | VIEW | | 90889 | 443K| 47021 (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 23 | HASH JOIN | | 90889 | 2307K| 47021 (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 24 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 76113 | 966K| 26743 (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 25 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 5095K| 63M| 20245 (2)| 00:04:03 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
3 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK" AND
"SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
4 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD")
5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
9 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
10 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
12 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
13 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
17 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
18 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
19 - access("SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
20 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
23 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
24 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
25 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:16 PM
Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:18 PMHi Paul,
I misread your question initially .The system stats are outdated in both ( same result as seen from aux_stats) .I am not a DBA and do not have access to gather system stats fresh.
select * from sys.aux_stats$
SNAME PNAME PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO STATUS NULL COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTART NULL 02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTOP NULL 02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO FLAGS 1 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEEDNW 1321.20523 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOSEEKTIM 10 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOTFRSPEED 4096 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN SREADTIM NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MREADTIM NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEED NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MBRC NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MAXTHR NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN SLAVETHR NULL NULL -
Using different templates for the desktop and phone versions of the same blog
I have a site which was created in Adobe Muse and is hosted on Business Catalyst.
I have created both a desktop and a phone versions of the site.
I want to know how I can integrate the blogs that I currently have on the desktop site with the phone version that I just did, using different templates for the desktop and phone versions of the same blog. This is in order to ensure that visitors to the blogs on the website are directed to the templates that render correctly for the devices they are using.
My current approach has been to create both a desktop and phone versions of the blogs. The problem with this however, is that the dates are different and the comments are separated between the two blog versions!
I have also tried enabling mobile templates in BC, but still couldn't find a way to specify the mobile versions of the templates for the same blog?
To recap my problem, I basically need a solution where the same blog uses different templates for desktop and mobile (both templates use different navigation headings and menu styles)
Thanks.There can be few reason for this, including page contents links or contents used in phone/tablet version.
Please provide the site url , also try to publish the site as a trial site in Business Catalyst with all layouts which would help to isolate the issue.
Thanks,
Sanjit -
Different Schemas in different environments for same tables used in a Universe
Hi,
I have a Universe in Development where I have tables pointed to a schema (DW) in DEV but in TEST/INT I have the same tables under a different schema (TESTDW). So when I promote the Universe & reports from DEV to TEST, I will be getting errors as the schema is incorrect. So we need to find a way so that we can define the schema globally instead of having it at the individual table.
I know we can repoint the schemas, etc but i need to avoid extra work in other environments.
Known Solutions: Promote the reports to TEST, then select all the tables & change the schema by Right Clicking the selected tables and selecting Change Qualifier/Owner.
One of the few reasons, I don't want to follow this route, because I have lot of derived tables which I need to change it manually by editing the SQL Statement, & also If I add new tables or columns again in future & promote them to TEST, then again I have to change the schema.
Did anyone faced this kind of issue?Is there any other way that we can use like Begin_Sql , etc?
(FYI, I am using BO4.0 SP5)Mark, Thanks a lot for your concern. We actually have same schema name across all 3 environments but there is a huge project going on in my company which is kind of hard to explain, so our team has decided to go ahead with a different names for schemas as 2 different teams will be working on paralelly on these schemas & they will combine them after a year or so. (I know this is not a solution)
Thanks Swapnil for Synonyms solution. Your solution might have worked, if we were using BO 4.1 SP5 but unfortunately we are using BO 4.0 and in this version I can't view any synonym tables in the universe. -
Hi all,
I am new in manufacturing and we want to implement functionality of generating single move order for same component among different job using component pick release. Can any one help in this.
we are using oracle R 12.1.3 version.
For example. We create finish good XYZ which is build in WIP item. We create discrete jobs for XYZ suppose JOB1,JOB2,JOB3 multiple job we can create for XYZ item. in these JOB suppose component abc is similar with 5 quantity. so our goal is to generate 1 move order for all three JOBS with 15 quantity of abc component.
please help me to achieve this goal. Immediate Reply will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
user11152750PranitSaha
Thanks For your reply. Can you please tell me in detail how can I group as I am new. How using MRP we can group same component from different job in single move order for delivering that component to shop floor.
Thank you.. -
Different View for same document library on a Wiki Page
Hi,
I am developing a Provided hosted app which have a functionality to create a document library with two Views. Also we need to show this document library in a wiki page with two different views.
I am using CSOM (C#). I am able to create the document library and the two views programmatically. But when I add the document library in the wiki page the default view (All Documents) is shown for both the web parts. There is an hidden view created with
the WebPartDefinition from the xml provided through code.
Through CSOM we are able make a View as default with the link below.
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/90433/add-document-library-xsltlistviewwebpart-using-csom-or-web-services
In my case both the webparts will get the same view, where I need different view for same document library in a wiki page.
Also I tried to update the web parts with the following code.
string viewString = @"<View Name='{0}' MobileView='TRUE' Type='HTML' Url='/SitePages/Home.aspx' Level='1' BaseViewID='1' ContentTypeID='0x' ImageUrl='/_layouts/15/images/dlicon.png?rev=23' >
<Query><Where><Eq><FieldRef Name='KeyDocument'/><Value Type='Boolean'>1</Value></Eq></Where></Query>
<ViewFields><FieldRef Name='FileLeafRef'/><FieldRef Name='DocumentOwner'/><FieldRef Name='Modified'/>
<FieldRef Name='_UIVersionString'/><FieldRef Name='Editor'/></ViewFields>
<RowLimit Paged='TRUE'>30</RowLimit><JSLink>clienttemplates.js</JSLink><XslLink Default='TRUE'>main.xsl</XslLink>
<Toolbar Type='Standard'/></View>";
WebPartDefinition wpd = wpfound.FirstOrDefault();
string formattedstring = String.Format(viewString, wpd.Id);
wpd.WebPart.Properties["XmlDefinition"] = formattedstring;
wpd.SaveWebPartChanges();
web.Context.ExecuteQuery();
I created two views (viewString) as shown above.
The above code did not throw error, but it did not update the web part.
Please advise how to move forward.Hi Samir,
When we click outside of the list view webpart on a webpart page (or allitems.aspx page) with containing multiple webparts, the list view webpart will lose the focus, and the selected items will be deselected, this is by design.
You can look at the following article with using the approach/workaround of Javascript to prevent the specified list view webpart from losing focus.
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/44360/list-view-loses-focus-when-additional-webpart-added-to-page
//Set focus on our list web part
var webPart = document.getElementById('WebPartWPQ1');
WpClick({target: webPart});
//Prevent it from losing focus
SP.Ribbon.WebPartComponent.$3_1.deselectWebPartAndZone = function() { };
Thanks
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support -
Create wip jobs for same item with different routings.
My scenario is , i am having 2 production lines for the same End item. If both lines are available to use, then WIP jobs have to be created for both lines. If either one is available then WIP job has to be created only for that line. Please suggest the setups for this. This way i can increase the production rate.
HI Jey-2013,
In your organization, you first need to define Bills and Routings for the item/items. Now to use two routings for 1 item, you need to define Alternate Routing.
For that go to BOM>Setup> Alternates and create an Alternate name for the second routing.
Then Go again to BOM>routing and use the Alternate name for the item to create a different Routing. After that you will have two different routings for same item.
Whenever you create a job in WIP, you will have an option to choose either the default or the original routing. This way you can accomplish your goal of using different routings as and when required. Hope this helps you. Kindly let me know
Regards,
Bhargav -
How to make Different Price for same product in one Sale Order
How can i customizing my system?
I need to sale for different price same product A in one sale order. And price condition type cant be manually. i can separate them by position. for ex. in first position: product A is one price and in 2nd product A with discount. i tried to do it by changing a price group for 2nd position to determinate a discount condition but it generates invoice split.
Someone have any suggestions?Hi
you can have it automatically determined after some custo and using userexit_pricing_prepare_tkomp in MV45AFZZ and RV60AFZZ.
The idea is to use ítem category field (PSTYV) as a part of pricing data to determine different prices for same material by changing manually ítem category when creating a sales order
- you'll need to create a new ítem category copied from the one you´re using and do all assignments
- add field PSTYV, if not there, to pricing field catalog. This thread has an example on how to and coding required for userexits
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1693234
- Adjust your pricing sequence as per new table
- Maintain specific prices in new table for materials with this new ítem category
Finally, when creating a sales order change, when required, default ítem category by new one to get specific price for material.
Regards,
JM -
I have installed adobe CC on two different computers for same account so I can work at two different places. I uploaded files to it yesterday and I can't find it on the CC folder on second computer. What can I do?
Hi DeafScientist,
Please try the below mentioned links.
Creative Cloud Help | Browse, sync, and manage assets
Error: "Unable to sync files"
Creative Cloud File Sync | Known issues
Kindly revert if you are unable to sync files.
Thanks,
Atul Saini -
Engineering and Manufacturing Org has different name for same item
Dear All,
I have an Engineering department generally Create items and configure bills, routings then, transfer all to Manufacturing org.
My client has typical requirement as follows...
Engineering and manufacturing department has different name for same item.
Eg: Item A in Manufacturing org may be called as Item AA in Engg org. I have to maintain 2 names for same item. How to map this requirement in R12.
Regards,
SaravananCan oyu not make it an organization level item and specify the proce there instead of keeping it a master level item?
Regards,
Utsav. -
Multiple plans for my SQL- Which one is following?-11gr2
11gr2, windows-64-bit
I have one sql_id part of 3rd part application, need to tune it. When I tried to get its execution plan im seeing multiple plan_plan values. That means, multiple plans for
same sql_id
How could we know that which plan my sql_id is following.?
SQL> set lines 300
SQL> set pages 50
SQL> select * from TABLE(dbms_xplan.display_awr('5z1r29wc6514q'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 5z1r29wc6514q
SELECT INVOICE_ID,min(CHARGE_DATE),MAX(CHARGE_DATE),
sum(TOTAL_EXCL_VAT),sum(case when instr(LEVEL2,:"SYS_B_0")>:"SYS_B_1"
then SUM_QUANTITY else :"SYS_B_2" end) as KB from
RATOR_CDR.INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE I INNER JOIN SUBSCRIPTION S ON S.ID =
I.SUBSCRIPTION_ID inner join SERVICE S1 on S1.SUBSCRIPTION_ID=S.ID
WHERE INVOICE_ID in (SELECT id from RATOR.INVOICE WHERE
invoice_number is null) and S1.PHONE_NUMBER=:1 and LEVEL1=:2 group
by INVOICE_ID
Plan hash value: 216300602
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 1350 (100)| | | |
| 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 333 | 40293 | 1350 (1)| 00:00:17 | | |
| 2 | HASH JOIN | | 333 | 40293 | 1348 (1)| 00:00:17 | | |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1638 | 161K| 866 (0)| 00:00:11 | | |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 34 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SERVICE | 1 | 23 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SERVICE__PHONE_NUMBER | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 8 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | SUBSCRIPTION__ID_PK | 1 | 11 | 0 (0)| | | |
| 9 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 1684 | | 46 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 17 |
| 10 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDL_SUB_ID | 1684 | | 46 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 17 |
| 11 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE | 1581 | 103K| 864 (0)| 00:00:11 | 1 | 1 |
| 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | INVOICE | 6048 | 118K| 481 (1)| 00:00:06 | | |
SQL_ID 5z1r29wc6514q
SELECT INVOICE_ID,min(CHARGE_DATE),MAX(CHARGE_DATE),
sum(TOTAL_EXCL_VAT),sum(case when instr(LEVEL2,:"SYS_B_0")>:"SYS_B_1"
then SUM_QUANTITY else :"SYS_B_2" end) as KB from
RATOR_CDR.INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE I INNER JOIN SUBSCRIPTION S ON S.ID =
I.SUBSCRIPTION_ID inner join SERVICE S1 on S1.SUBSCRIPTION_ID=S.ID
WHERE INVOICE_ID in (SELECT id from RATOR.INVOICE WHERE
invoice_number is null) and S1.PHONE_NUMBER=:1 and LEVEL1=:2 group
by INVOICE_ID
Plan hash value: 1282779260
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 1392 (100)| | | |
| 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 325 | 39000 | 1392 (1)| 00:00:17 | | |
| 2 | HASH JOIN | | 325 | 39000 | 1391 (1)| 00:00:17 | | |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | INVOICE | 5972 | 116K| 550 (1)| 00:00:07 | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1794 | 175K| 840 (0)| 00:00:11 | | |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 34 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SERVICE | 1 | 23 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SERVICE__PHONE_NUMBER | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 9 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | SUBSCRIPTION__ID_PK | 1 | 11 | 0 (0)| | | |
| 10 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 1836 | | 48 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 18 |
| 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDL_SUB_ID | 1836 | | 48 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 18 |
| 12 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE | 1722 | 110K| 838 (0)| 00:00:11 | 1 | 1 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------also, Any suggestions to tune this query
ThanksHarry wrote:
11gr2, windows-64-bit
I have one sql_id part of 3rd part application, need to tune it. how do plan on modifying 3 ^rd^ party application?
Maybe you are looking for
-
I just loaded Lion on our iMac 2 days ago and it was the worst thing I have ever done. How do I uninstall or remove it and go back to Snow Leopard? I can't get any help right now due to time zones. I have an Apple Care account that isn't doing me any
-
SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1 plus attachment
Hi; i´m using FM SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1 to send email with 3 attachments, the problem is with the result size of the 3 XLS files in the attachment. The first XLS attachment file code: lt_packing_list-transf_bin = 'X'. lt_packing_list-head
-
I've read in a lot of forums about people having problems with ibook displays but I haven't been able to find anything that quite matches my problem. My Ibook has been dropped a number of times and survived - it has numerous small cracks and the bott
-
User without the Chief position in org id to view the resources under him.
Hi, The requirement is: A person who is playing the role of a crew leader should be able to fill the time sheet of his crew. This person will not be given the chief position for the org id that he is tagged to. There will be different person who will
-
RE: Big Log Files resulting in Out Of Memory of serverpartition
To clean a log on nt, you can open it with notepad, select all and delte, add a space ans save as... with the same file name on unix, you can just redirect the standard input to the file name (e.g.: # > forte_ex_2390.log (Should work with nt but i ne