Usage of FR1/FR2/FR3/FR4 transaction with PO having account assignment K

Hello,
I'm currently having problem regarding the usage of the accounting scheem impacted by FR1/FR2/FR3/FR4 itransaction n OBYC.
1- When the PO is linked to a material, all the transaction are impacted (acct key  / accrual key " in M/08). ==> OK
2- When the PO is done with material group and account assignment K "cost center", only the accrual key is taken in M/08. The expense account used is the one linked to the material group in OMQW  and then OBYC GBB/VBR. ==> KO.
Can you please advice me how we can manage freight and custom MM price condition for PO with accoutn assignment K, in order to get the correct expense freight account and customs exepnse account @ GR level.
Thank you for your help.

Hi,
I had this problem as well; it was fixed recently by SAP. Implement these notes (some could be irrelevant for your configuration):
0001140456  MODIF:FMCF108 during reassignment with FMCT/FMJ2 
0001229929  FMCG/FMCB:Reassignment of Payment Lines (VT 57) 
0001263965  Incorrect GR/IR FM account assignment derivation for service 
0001264478  Reassignment: Incomplete error messages 
0001299672  Reassignment:Incorrect Changes to Earmarked Fund Document 
0001381343  Reassigning document chains 
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

  • PO with single & multiple account assignment

    Hi expert,
    I got one PO with single & multiple account assignment. How should I book invoice. I try using MIRA for items with multiple acct and MIRO for items with single acct. I works but can I do it in one shot instead of splitting. If so, how?
    One more thing: if I got invoice saved in MIRA but without any items. It can't be changed. It say it is schedule by background. How could I change it?
    Thx

    Hi
    You can use MIRO to check book the invoice for both single account assignment and mulitple acc assignment.
    You have to select the lay out Account assignment with cost center.
    For Multiple account assignment you can see the Button in the line item, click it to maintain the multiple account assignment.
    Hope it helps.
    Thanks /Karthik

  • SNC : Error while creating Subcon PO with Order (F) account assignment cat

    Hi,
    I am trying to implement Outsourced Manufacturing scenario with ECC 604 and SNC 7.0
    We would like to demonstrate "Real Time Consumption" once a phase has been completed for WO in SNC.
    For this, it is necessary create Subcon PO with A/c assignment category F. While trying to create PO, i get the following error:
    1. Acct assignment determination is not poss.in the account assgnmnt manager
    Message no. IAOM220
    Diagnosis
    Errors occurred during the determination of the account assignment in the account assignment manager. Thus it is not possible to determine the account assignment.
    2. Characteristics for Controlling object have errors
    Message no. IAOM034
    Diagnosis
    There are errors in the characteristics that are transferred when creating or changing a Controlling object.
    System Response
    Processing stopped.
    Procedure
    Look at the messages prior to this object in the error log. They give an indication as to which characteristics have errors.
    3. Hierarchy level 01 not defined in business scenario Outsourced Manufacturing
    Message no. IAOM027
    Diagnosis
    In business scenario 'Outsourced Manufacturing', hierarchy level 01 was accessed. There is no key characteristic defined for this hierarchy level.
    System Response
    Processing is terminated.
    Procedure
    Inform SAP or the provider of the business scenario, if the business scenario was not provided by SAP.
    If you are responsible for the business scenario yourself, check the definition of the business scenario.
    Settings specific to CO order that have been maintained:
    IAOM1 - Maintain Controlling Scenario
    IAOM2 - Maintain Controlling Integration
    KA02 - Default Cost assgnmnet
    Tick RT consumption in ME11 (Vendor Purchasing Info Record).
    Any idea???
    Regards,
    Sandeep

    Dear,
    Did you also experience the following?
    We are at the following step in the scenario:
    Supplier confirms production progress =>Manufacturingworkorderproductionprogressnotification XML is generated => POST component consumption is executed in the R/3 system (ECC 6 EHP4).
    We see the following problems after posting the component consumption
    -     table EKBE_SC is not filled
    -     in transaction kkf3 => CO production order => no booking/posting of progress
    -     Component consumption is reflected in an outbound delivery with movement type 543, but it is missing the link with the purchase order+item (see screenshot below) => as a result any post issue booking is not possible.
    Thanks for your help.
    Kindr regards,
    Stefan Hemeryck

  • Error while creating Subcon PO with Order (F) account assignment cat

    Hi,
    I am trying to implement Outsourced Manufacturing scenario with ECC 604 and SNC 7.0
    We would like to demonstrate "Real Time Consumption" once a phase has been completed for WO in SNC.
    For this, it is necessary create Subcon PO with A/c assignment category F. While trying to create PO, i get the following error:
    1. Acct assignment determination is not poss.in the account assgnmnt manager
    Message no. IAOM220
    Diagnosis
    Errors occurred during the determination of the account assignment in the account assignment manager. Thus it is not possible to determine the account assignment.
    2. Characteristics for Controlling object have errors
    Message no. IAOM034
    Diagnosis
    There are errors in the characteristics that are transferred when creating or changing a Controlling object.
    System Response
    Processing stopped.
    Procedure
    Look at the messages prior to this object in the error log. They give an indication as to which characteristics have errors.
    3. Hierarchy level 01 not defined in business scenario Outsourced Manufacturing
    Message no. IAOM027
    Diagnosis
    In business scenario 'Outsourced Manufacturing', hierarchy level 01 was accessed. There is no key characteristic defined for this hierarchy level.
    System Response
    Processing is terminated.
    Procedure
    Inform SAP or the provider of the business scenario, if the business scenario was not provided by SAP.
    If you are responsible for the business scenario yourself, check the definition of the business scenario.
    Settings specific to CO order that have been maintained:IAOM1 - Maintain Controlling Scenario
    IAOM2 - Maintain Controlling Integration
    KA02 - Default Cost assgnmnet
    Tick RT consumption in ME11 (Vendor Purchasing Info Record).
    Any idea???
    Regards,
    Sandeep

    well it seems to be an CO issue
    please check if the g/l is maintained as cost element
    also check the setting s of account assignment catergory F and let us on which modifier key is maintained there make sure in OBYC-GBB the g/l is maintained for the material valuation class and which should be cost lement

  • BAPI_ENTRYSHEET_CREATE with "No Multi Account Assignment" and above 99 item

    Hiii Gurus,
    I am facing a problem.
    I have an ALV with fields  Service NO. , Order No.. etc.
    Now i have to select all records or some from ALV  to create Entrysheet.
    Now the problem is if i selected less then 99 items from My ALV of different    Service no.
    then it works ok.
    I have to select all and to create Service Entry sheet.
    It is creating problem
    some orders are not processed
    the requirement is for   1service no. =  99  order will process.
    the initial screen of TCODE ML81N should be   ( 99 * Service No ) Line Items..
    Please Help

    Hi Jain,
    Could you please let us know the soultion how you resolved yourself.
    Thanks,
    Satheesh

  • Problem with G/L accounts assignation

    Hi, everybody,
    Soe time ago my client asked me to create a new Material Group. I created it in "SPRO --> Logistics - General --> Material Master --> Settings for Key Fields --> Define Material Groups"
    Then i assigned Valuation Class to material group in OMQW transaction and assigneded G/L account number in OBYC, Transaction Key GBB and General modification VBR.
    But still the assignement doesn't work. My client tried to issue a invoice and it doen't post to the needed G/L account, as a matter of fact it doesn't take any G/L account.
    Any ideas?

    Hi,
        VBR is for the consumption posting, this is usually posted by the outbound delivery.  The invoice usually only posts the sales revenue.
    Since no posting is generated the invoice type is probably set to not FI relevant.
    It seems that you want the invoice to create the comsumption posting,in this case i would suggest posting in the SD Forum,someone there may be able to help you.
    Kind regards

  • FR1 and FR3

    Hi
    I ve a scenario, For FRB1 condition type if am putting FR1 in account key and FR3 in accrual key .
    2 nd scenario, i am putting FR3 for both account key and accruals.
    What is the difference? pls explain

    Hi
    Freight clearing (FR1),
    provision for freight charges (FR2),
    customs duty clearing (FR3)
    If you use FR1 as account key & FR3 as accrual key then two accounts are trigerred at the time time of GR posting & invoice posting
    If you use FR3 as account & accrual then only one account is trigerred at the time of GR & invoice posting
    FR1, FR2, FR3, FR4 are to be used based on the Delivery cost condition type.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • GR for purchase order with Account assignment E

    Hello All
    I am having a scenario where in the BOM structure is as under: A->B->C--->D, D is the raw material, C is the component produced in-house, B is the material which we procure through subcontracting, in the material master of C SPK:30 is used for subcontracting, & A is in-house produced material with purely MTO scenario (20 - strategy).
    Once the sales order of A is there we run MRP for it, as per the master data settings described above we get purchase requisition for D & when I convert it to purchase order it is having account assignment as E.
    This is all well but the moment I try to save it, system throws an error stating: 'G/L account 20500100 cannot be used (please correct)". This G/L account is of raw material itself.
    Can you please guide me to overcome this problem.
    I am looking forward to listen from you soon.
    Regards,
    J K Tharwani

    Hi
    Check the OBYC settings for this transaction, assign the correct G/L for this transaction. Try to get the help from MM consultant to resolve this.
    Check in BSX Transaction for the invetroy posting.
    Check the G/L account it is exist for your company code.
    Take the G/L account which is coming in the error message and go to FS00 t code select tab Create/blank/interest , there you will have field status group just double click on that . It will take you to field status group display in that check the combination of the selection.
    Thanks
    S.Murali
    Edited by: S. Murali on Jun 26, 2009 5:07 PM
    Edited by: S. Murali on Jun 26, 2009 5:19 PM

  • MIRO invoice creation with the Personnel Number in account assignment

    I am using BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE for creating an Invoice using MIRO transaction.
    In MIRO transaction-> PO reference-> Multiple account assignment-> we have the personnel number: In BAPI table-parameter ACCOUNTINGDATA and ITEMDATA is used to populate the account assignmet data but this structure doesn't have the Personnel Number field (PERSON_NO).
    How can i create an Invoice with the Personnel Number in Account assignment, Is there any Userexit or BADI is available ?
    Thanks,
    Fract
    Edited by: fract_get on May 23, 2011 6:49 PM

    You can use EXTENSIONIN parameter from tables. There are BADI's related to this but don't know the name of badi. Please search forum for or use transaction code SE84 to search the BADI's/
    you can check the badi: INVOICE_UPDATE and method 'before_save or something similar to map to db table fields.
    See this thread to understand how extension parameters works.
    bapi_salesorder_simulate extension bape_vbap standard field
    Edited by: Sampath Kumar on May 23, 2011 11:28 AM

  • Equipment with no location or account assignment data

    Hi experts,
    In our solution, we are using equipment records without functional locations or account assignments.  Yet I still see records for each equipment in ILOA with a new account assignment number (ILOAN).  Is this standard SAP or is there a way (in config maybe) to avoid the automatic creation of these records in ILOA. 
    EQUZ contains a record for each equipment with a difference ILOAN as well.
    Thanks,
    Paula

    Paula,
    A new ILOA record is created for the equipment each time you change the Location data. This then used as part of the equipment history (usage list, change logs, etc).
    Certain fields can be configured (via IMG) to create new records.
    If you don't change these fields, then it won't create new ILOA records. Therefore you will have one ILOA record for each EQUI/EQUZ record.
    There is nothing much you can do about this without modifying SAP standard code. And in any case it would be unwise since we do not know the knock-on effects. Nor do you know if you may need this functionality in the future...
    Many clients have millions of equipment records, each with multiple ILOA records. This should not affect the system if it is "sized" correctly...
    PeteA

  • Two iPhone's with one iTunes account?

    Hi,
    Can someone tell me what will happen with my iTunes account assign to iPhone if I will give that iPhone away and buy new one. To be precise I am planning to buy new iPhone in June/July through O2 here in UK and give old one to my wife who is got Pay as You go SIM card from O2 as well, which work fine with my iPhone now (even data transfer but that cost £3/Mb at this moment!). I just wonder what will happen to all my Apps in my iTunes account when I will try sync these two iPhones then? I guess it’s not possible to share the same account between two iPhones. What are my options here?
    Thanks in advance.

    There is nothing that prevents you from sharing or using the same iTunes account with more than one iPhone. If your wife has her own iTunes account, when syncing this iPhone with iTunes when she is logged in to her account will transfer her iTunes account to the iPhone for access with the iTunes store and app store on the iPhone.

  • GR going to wrong GL account for PO Item with Account Assignment Category M

    Hi Experts,
    I need some help on GR posting for PO Item with M as AAC.
    PO1 for material ABC with M as  Account Assignment Category, when I book GR for this Item, the GL document generated as below.
    Dr: PRD  (Cost Price Differences)
    Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
    The material ABC price control is "S" and already have standard cost.
    For another material DEF which have ascetically same master data as  ABC and got a similar PO2 with M as Account Assignment Category.
    But the GR document as below.
    Dr: BSX (Inventory)
    Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
    How can be one same setting got so different results, is there any data in Material or PO make these differences?
    Actually the results for material DEF is what we want, how could I avoid the GR results for material ABC.
    Thanks~

    Thanks you Mukthar,
    I have checked all the information and porcess for both material and did a lot of testing in testing system.
    Here is what I found.
    Case
    Material ABC  SO: 1111   PO: 6666 (ACC:M)
    Material DEF  SO:2222    PO: 7777(ACC:M)
    All the information in material mast data, SO, PO are the same.
    The differences is that:
    PO:6666 post GR before Material ABC's standard price release. So the first GR document as below
    Dr: PRD  (Cost Price Differences)
    Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
    This is correct document without material stand cost.
    The problem we reverse the fist GR document, release standard cost for Material ABC. Then re-do the GR. but the GL document still book into  PRD instead of BSX.
    If I create a new SO:3333 and PO:8888 (with ACC M) for material ABC now.
    The GR could be book into BSX.
    It seem like once the PO got GR with 0 standard cost, even I relesed a new price for the material and re do the GR, it still take the previous 0 cost to book inventory which make all the amount into PRD.
    Quite Strange

  • PO Error in Process with Multiple account assignment

    Hi ,
    I am working with Extended Classsic scenario.
    Problem is with PO with Multiple account assignement.
    There is only one user who is getting problem with one particular account assignement "CCC" - Cost Center RP.. . When PO gets created with this particular AAC , it goes into "Error in process" only for one user.
    In RZ20 it shows messsage as "Please enter quantity or percentage for account assignment" & "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set f or multi acct. assgt.".
    On other hand , other users are able to order the PO with the same AAC without any error.
    What could be the reason behind this only for one user ?
    Regards,
    Sheetal

    Hi ,
    I have checked it intially and both are identical.
    Initialy the problem was, user had entered 128 times AA line items  ( added & deleted ) in the PO while in the SC it was having only 64.... Our system accepts line items till 99 , so i asked him to delete the items above 99 ..
    So after that POs error has gone and it went for approval..
    But after approval it again went into error in process
    Sheetal

  • Subcontract GI with account assignment Q

    hi guys,
    I have a problem in subcon GI to vendor with account assignment Q (project specific).if i am raising a PO with item category L and with out any account assignment, i this case i am able to do GI in ME2O.
    But, with account assignment Q, It is not appearing In ME2O.
    thanks in advance
    vikram

    You cannot do hat because subcontacting itself is a special stock(when you do GI), hence you can have two specila stock indicator for the same stock( Q and subcontracting)
    If you want to send it to vendor then you need to release the stock from Q stock to unresticted then go GI-541(o),, then if you Do GI then system will transfer from UN stock to specila stock i.e. subcontactor stock)
    please come back if you need furthur information

  • BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER - PR with account assignment

    Hi Gurus,
    When I transfer Stock PR the system correctly creates a Shopping Cart without Account Assignment. But if the PR has an account assigment, for example Cost Center K, I get the following error in SLG1 on SRM side:
    No logical system for FI is maintained; inform system admin.
    Message no. BBP_PD055
    We need to create the shopping cart in SRM with the same account assignement that has the Purchase Requisition in R/3. In the SRM customizing the determination of the GL Account is via Product Category. Do I have to maintain this configuration or leave empty?
    Thanks
    Ezequiel

    Hi Muthu,
    I am not using any Badi for this. The issue is like you said:
    PR without acc *** --> Works fine --> SC Created
    PR with acc *** --> Error message.
    I have set up SYS attribute with both R/3 backend Logical system and SRM Logical system.
    Also configured "Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignment Category". Tried with the following set of entries:
    Category ID / Source System / AcctAssCat / GL Account / Default
    ProdCat      /            R3           /          CC       /                      /      x
    Category ID / Source System / AcctAssCat / GL Account / Default
    ProdCat      /         SRM           /          CC       /                      /      x
    Category ID / Source System / AcctAssCat / GL Account / Default
    ProdCat      /            R3           /          CC       /                      /      x
    ProdCat      /         SRM           /          CC       /                      /      x
    br
    Ezequiel

Maybe you are looking for