Use taxcode on item level via Punch-out

Hi,
We use the SRM 5.0 classic scenario.
We also make use of a punch-out catalog where many shopping carts (SC) are ordered.
The behaviour now is that the there is no tax code in a position in the back-end order. Because of the use of the classic sc the tax calculation is done in the back-end, with the result that the tax code has to be added manualy by the purchaser.
Is there a way to use the tax code from the item in the punch-out catalog and add that to the PO on item level?
If not, what is the alternative?
Kind regards,
Jorgen

Hi all,
Is there no body ho has experience in this mather?
Regards.

Similar Messages

Mapping Networkdrive using GPO and Item-Level Targeting - Same Letter in two groups

Hi.
I'm using one GPO to Map networkdrives, we are using it with Item-Level Targeting which targets on Security Group, so a Member of "SecurityGroup" gets the Drive, we have several drives and we are using all the Letters that are available, now I'm
in a pickle and need help with If a User is part of two Security Groups that uses the same letter to map the drive, Example: User1 is a part of two security groups "Drive-Sales" and "Drive-Account" these two Security Groups uses the same
Letter in the GPO to map the drive, so if the User is in both Groups he only gets the "Sales Drive" but not "Account Drive".
So what I need is that can the GPO assign next Available letter on the computer that "user1" is logged on, and can it be signed on the "Account Drive". ?
Hope you understand what I'm going for
Kind Regards
Haflidi Fridthjofsson.

> we are using all the Letters that are available
You should eventually switch to DFS Namespaces and Access based
enumeration - so each user will have the DFS root assigned and can only
see the subfolders he has access to.
> So what I need is that can the GPO assign next Available letter on the
> computer that "user1" is logged on, and can it be signed on the "Account
> Drive". ?
Yes: Create another assigment with an ILT of "user is member of BOTH
groups" and use "next available" in this assignment.
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

Multiple items not getting transfered from Punch out

Hi,
I need your help in fixing an issue with punch out.
When we select more than one item in the punch out and when it is getting transferred to SRM shopping cart, we could see only one item in the shopping cart. We are facing this issue with only one punch out.
While trasnfering item(s) from this punch out, we are getting the message "Number of external bid is empty" in SLG1 log. I have checked the XML file sent by the punch out and there I could see all the items that has been selected. But once it gets transfered to SRM shopping cart, it is transfering only one item.
Not sure if this is a problem in SRM or punch out. If it is a problem in SRM then I hope it should occur with all the punch outs. But we are facing this issue with only one punch out.
I am trying to debug this process in SRM. For that I need to know the exact BADI or BAPI which is receiving the items from punch out. Could you please help me in that?
Also I would like to know, is there anything would happen after the XML file has been generated in punch out and before it has been received by OCI.
We are in SRM 4.0 with extended classic scenario.
Thanks,
Arun

Dean,
We have implemented that BADI. As I mentioned earlier, problem is occuring with only one punch out we are using. With other punch outs it is working fine. More over, when I tried to debug through this BADI I am getting a dump error:
No additional external fashion for New ABAP debugger available
What happened?
The ITS services u201Ebbpsc03" had to be interrupted because the WebAs sent the following error message.
Error message: "No additional external fashion for New ABAP debugger available". Message type: "E"
Error analysis
It became receive an error message of the WebAs. For the reason picture of the error message (program: u201ESAPMSSY3" Dynpro number: 131) no Template was found, must interrupted become the ITS services
therefore. Remove if possible the mistake cause. First if the mistake cause is removed and therewith the error message is sent by the WebAs no longer, again lauffähig is these ITS services.
Do you have any idea what the dump is?
Thanks,
Arun

Issue with transfering items from punch out

Hi All,
We are using a punch out for ordering shopping carts. It is working fine for all the users but not for one of the user. That user is able to open punch out site in her system and able to select the items in that punch out. But when she clicked on "checkout" button in that site, it is not transferring the items to the shopping cart. Rather it give internet explorer error" Page cannot be displayed". I believe, this is not a punch out or SRM issue. It should be an issue with the user's system settings.
But I am not sure where to check? Is it something that the cookies need to be enabled in user's system? Could you please help me with your suggestions?
Thanks,
SS

Hi,
You could perform a HTTP trace (using HTTP watch) and compare the OCI data in POST method for both users (the correct and incorrect ones).
Perhaps there is some additional/missing information being passed from catalog to SRM.
Kind regards,
Ricardo

Issue in using custom discount condition type in pricing agreement at Service Contract line item level

Hello
We are facing an issue while using a Z discount condition type in price agreement at service contract line item level.
A Z Condition type has been created in ECC and assigned to the pricing procedure. This pricing procedure is downloaded in CRM and determined in the service contract.
A condition maintenance group using this Z condition type is created in CRM and assigned to service contract item category.
Condition records are created in CRM for this condition type/condition maintenance group for specific products along with sales org and discount percentage.
But when the price agreement(using this condition type) is used at the item level of a service contract, the system throws errors (related to product/unit of measure and sales org, even though no issues seem to be there)and thus the price agreement is not allowed to be used.
If anyone has worked on such kind of scenario, please get in touch, I will share more details for the same.
Regards
Ankit Arora

Dear Ankit,
Once the pricing procedure is downloaded, please maintain the document pricing procedure at service contract header level, and maintain the customer pricing procedure at business partner sales area billing data.
In spro, maintain the pricing procedure for the combination of sales area, document pricing procedure, customer pricing procedure.
Please crosscheck whether the condition table is active or not.
Regards,
Maddy

Validating Product Category on SC Trasfer from punch-out catalog

Hi,
We have a requirement to validate Product Category of the shopping cart items transferred from punch-out catalog items. This requirement will allow us to put controls on vendors from publishing items that are not approved for their product category codes.
One way to achieve this is by adding validations in BAdI BBP_CATALOG_TRANSFER and maintaining valid vendor product categories in a custom table.
I tried to use the Extended Attributes in Org plan of Vendor. I tried testing with that in sandbox and did not seem to work.
Another option I can think of is to add attributes for ProductCategoryCode on Org plan of vendor and validate in BBP_CATALOG_TRANSFER instead of using custom tables.
Please let me the best way to achieve this.
Thanks,
Suren

Hi
We have done this long time back...
By using the combination of BADIs -
BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI and
BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI, this csn be done..
Read the relevant SAP documentation of these BADIs using SE18 Transaction, which will definitely help in coding the logic as per the business requirements..
Regards
- Atul

Removing invoice block at line-item level

Hello SAP gurus
I've been asked by a client to create a way to delete invoice blocks at a line item level via workflow. The workflow sends a workitem for each blocked line-item that the invoice has. What I need to do now is create custom code that will delete a single line-item block instead of removing the block at the header level. This header-level block deletion will only occur when all the line item blocks are cleared.
I know there are a few programs that exist for doing this at the header level (BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_RELEASE, MRM_INVOICE_RELEASE_UPDATE, running a MRBR BDC, etc.), but so far I haven't found a standard SAP code to make this possible at the line-item level. I am aware that making changes to standard SAP table records is heavily not recommended (if not practically forbidden), but the client is insisting they want this functionality and soon. Is there another way of making this line-item block deletion without resorting to modifying the RSEG/RBKP/RBKP_BLOCKED tables? Thanks a lot for your help.
Regards,
-Juan Ramos

Hi,
If you want to split the deliveries in to number of nvoices general configuration is in Item category use Billing relevence = K (Delivery-related invoices for partial quantity).
At the time of creating Invoice in VF01 give the delivery number and click the selection list on the right side top.
You can split based on your line items.
Thanks,
Sree.Manam

Data/field line item / PO item level

Hello,
I would like to know which field I could use at SC item level to store a reference number for each line item.
This reference number should also be transfered to the PO line item in the backend.
Regards,
Lina
Edited by: lina shaiek on Nov 7, 2011 10:50 AM

Hi Sumith,
Good Day,
NetValue will be Dynamic Calculation. you will not get Old Netvalue directly from the table but you have workaround.
In table CDHDR and CDPOS those are change history tables.
in that you will have Changes history related to SalesOrder.
We have to pass
Objectclas = VERKBELEG
Objectid = Sales Order Number then
you can pass value into CDPOS
Objectclas = VERKBELEG
Objectid = Sales Order Number then
changenr = CDHDR-CHANGENR
then find changes relevent to Netvalue and obtain the Old Net value.
All the best.
Best Regards,
KSK

Document flow linkage between 2 sales orders at item level

Hi,
I am trying to generate a doc flow linkage together 2 sales orders at the header and item levels. This should happen when we create a new sales order, where it generates a doc flow with reference to an existing sales order.
My problem is that the doc flow does get created at the header and item levels using 'CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN', but the existing sales order is created as the 'Next document' in the doc flow. We need it the other way round - it should be as the preceding document.
Anyone ideas how I can achieve this ? If so, any help would be appreciated. I am on CRM 4.0.
Regards,
Vishal
Edited by: Vishal Narayan on Jan 14, 2010 4:45 PM

Hi
I am afraid you cannot do that converstion for the existing orders. BP at header level are enabled at teh document type level, while BP at item level is done at item category. So both are independent. Mostly it is advisabel to use BP at item level only.
If you are already using item level BP, and want to mvoe to header BP, then only future transactions can be executed with BP at header level. Existing item level BPlans will remain so in the system.

AD-hoc approver n step item level shopping cart workflow

Hi
We are on latest version of SRM and using n step item level SC approval workflow.
The scenario goes like this:
-     Requester creates shopping cart and workflow goes for two step approval.
-     In the approval preview the requester is able to see both levels of approvers, which is correct.
-     Requester now selects second level approver and replaces him with a ad-hoc approver. WE DO NOT WANT THIS. Requester should NOT be able to replace an approver determined by approval badi. However should be able to extend approval step with ad-hoc approver say third level approver a ad-hoc approver. Also he should be able to change AD-HOC approvers ONLY.
Thanks
Joe

Jo,
You may be able to achieve it in the BADI BBP_WFL_SECUR_BADI .
You can use the Business Add-In (BAdI) BBP_WFL_SECUR_BADI to determine whether
A shopping cart can be changed during the approval process
The approval workflow restarts when changes are made to the document
A reviewer/approver can be added or changedThese are the call scenarios (see import parameter SCENARIO).
Regards,
Suren

Punch out catalog displays Error screen when template SC is used using item

Hi,
We use a punch out catalogs for certain vendors.
For reordering same types of material our users have created template shopping carts for punch out catalog items. When users are trying to create SC from those template SCs the screen ends up in error in the vendor's catalog screen.
There are no data related issues involved here. The same material can be ordered from catalogs without using template SCs.
Is there any configs to be done in SRM side to make it work or the vendor catalog site has to make certain settings at their end ?
Please advise.
BR,
Sambit

Hi,
OCI has following functions.
+ OCI normal transfer - transfer items after user search
+ OCI validation - transfer items in background when catalog items are copied from SC
+ OCI detail - display the specific item detail in catalog when detail icon is selected in SC
+ OCI cross catalog search - background item search
Please check OCI specification.
SAP Supplier Relationship Management - SAP SRM Open Catalog Interface (B2B-OCI) [original link is broken]
Regards,
Masa

Change item level security using wwsbr_api.modify_item

Hi.
Im using wwsbr_api.modify_item for change item level security.
Its code for change type access for item of my procedure
l_masterid := portal30.wwsbr_api.modify_item(
p_master_item_id => 7061,
p_item_id => 7062,
p_caid => 136,
p_folder_id => 1,
p_display_name => 'test',
p_region_id => 5,
p_access_level => portal30.wwsbr_api.item_access,
p_text => 'test change item security',
p_addnewversion => true, -- My content area have item versioning
level is audit
After execute my procedure access type = folder.
I see in wwv_things table new record
masterthingid = 7061,
id = 7064,
security = 'folder'
How to change item level security programmatically?
Thanks

Jerry,
Please forgive me for persisting with this, and thankyou for your continued patience, but let me try to explain the issue I'm having in another way...
I have a function that calls wwsbr_api.modify_item to change, say, the description. In this case "description" is the one and only thing I want to change about the item. As you've described above, I am able to query most things associated with the item (via wwsbr_all_items, wwsec_api.grantee_list, etc) so that I can pass current values to the wwsbr_api.modify parameters. However, I haven't found a way to query the current level of access control for a given item (i.e. wether it is currently set to ITEM_ACCESS, FOLDER_ACCESS, or null). As documented, I can force the item to be ITEM_ACCESS or FOLDER_ACCESS. However, I don't want to force a value and as we have concluded, passing null will nullify the current state.
So, in summary, an answer to this question will solve my problem:
Is it possible to query the current access control level of an item (either directly via one of the published views or indirectly via one of the views)?
If the answer is yes - great that solves my problem. How please?!?!?
If the answer is no - this must be a bug is it would mean that it isn't possible to use wwsbr_api.modify_item without inadvertently altering the current access control level of the item.
Again thanks for your patience...
Mark

Mapping drive using GPO does not obey to Item-level targeting

Dear all,
We are mapping drive using Item-level targeting based on security group (User Configuration > Preferences > Windows Settings > Drive Maps) with the following settings:
Action: Replace
Run in logged-on user's security context: <Checked>
Item-level targeting: <Checked>
So if user is member of Group_X then he/she will have drive X mapped on his computer.
Problem now is that (even if reconnect is unchecked), drive will stay mapped when we remove a user from this group.
Is this the normal behavior ? did I missed something ?
or even worst, imho, should I add a new drive properties which would say to delete the drive if user does not belong to the relevant group ?
-> double targeting query for a single drive
-> what's the point of Replace / Reconnect then ?
Thanks in advance for your opinions!
/behd
[EDIT: Forgot to specify Win2008R2 AD, Win7 Pro clients but doubt that it'll be of any interest for this case]

Drive mapping should not remain after you remove the user from the group.
What I suspect is, that at first, the "reconnect" was checked then the user got the policy and tattooed the reconnect value. after that it doesn't matter that "reconnect" was removed.
Try the following:
Logon with test user, make sure no drive mapping exist (disconnect if necessary).
Create a new policy with drive map - make sure reconnect is not checked, and apply it for the test user.
Make sure no other drive mapping policy exist for that user.
Login with the test user, make sure drive was mapped.
Log off that user, remove it from the group, wait for AD replication and log on again (sometimes another log off \ log on required).
Please take a moment to Vote as Helpful and/or Mark as Answer where applicable. Thanks.

Item level targeting via printer preferences

I am trying to do item level targeting via printer preferences. I have tried numerous ways numerous times and cannot get this to work. I currently have 120 printers I am trying to assign via terminal server client ip range, workstation IP range , for different
sites, and also group permissions to those printers.
I have one printer I have the following setting (all the other printers follow this example depending on location and user
this collection is true
the terminal session is Remote Desktop Services with Client TCP/IP address between 10.4.1.1 and 10.4.1.254
Or the IP address range is 10.4.1.1 - 10.41.254
AND the user is a member of the security group SKIN\grpMIllennium
OR the user is a member of the security group SKIN\grpPrtSDCPerReceipt
However when I test this I am connecting from a 10.2.2.203 address but yet still get this printer. How can I limit this to only those IP addresses?

I am trying to do item level targeting via printer preferences. I have tried numerous ways numerous times and cannot get this to work. I currently have 120 printers I am trying to assign via terminal server client ip range, workstation IP range , for different
sites, and also group permissions to those printers.
I have one printer I have the following setting (all the other printers follow this example depending on location and user
this collection is true
the terminal session is Remote Desktop Services with Client TCP/IP address between 10.4.1.1 and 10.4.1.254
Or the IP address range is 10.4.1.1 - 10.41.254
AND the user is a member of the security group SKIN\grpMIllennium
OR the user is a member of the security group SKIN\grpPrtSDCPerReceipt
However when I test this I am connecting from a 10.2.2.203 address but yet still get this printer. How can I limit this to only those IP addresses?

How to use Item Level security

I am working on portal 9.0.2.6.18.
I have a folder with 1000 items. I want to grant groupA
access to 997 items and
(Group B,GroupA) access to 3 items.
How do i do this.
Here is what i tried:
1.enabled item level security on folder
2.granted folder level access to groupA and groupB
3.Changed access of 997 items to grant access to GroupA
4.Did nothing to the 3 items which i wanted to give access to GroupA,GroupB
Is there a better way of achieving this?
I am not really comfortable granting folder level access to groupB, because if i miss overwriting privileges of an item (in step 3), then groupB will have access to that item. I would love to change just 3 items because they are the exception.
How is this feature supposed to be used?
Thanks
Harish

Martin,
Thanks for the reply. I just cited 1000 items folder as an example. We have various complex combination of security requirements for folders and items. So creating sub-folders for each combination will not work for me.
Everytime the security requirements change we have to move the items around, which can confuse users. And sometimes we have to create sub-folders to workaround the item-level security problems even when there is no logical business classification to a set of items.
Harish

Use taxcode on item level via Punch-out

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for