Using a Behringer Mixer w/ Logic

Ok, here's the deal. The only experience I've had with digital audio is Garageband, which I've used for over a year, and have had great results with, but I decided I wanted to try out something better, so I went for Logic Express, naturally. I have a Behringer Eurorack UB1202 Audio Mixer. I know it is in working condition because when I used it in Garageband, it worked like a charm. No setting up, nothing. Just plug it in and I'm done.
However, when I have the exact same setup in Logic, the program won't even acknowledge the fact that any sound is being produced at all. I have the mixer hooked up via a 1/4 cable connected to a Monster cable adaptor, which is then plugged into my Powerbook's audio-in port. If anyone can help me get this mixer set up without using too much jargon I'm unfamiliar with, that would be great.

Ok, as it says that you need to do what I said first.
Lets do this from the start, open logic if you haven't modified the autoload song lets just use that.
Find yourself an "Audio" track, it'll say Audio 1(or 2 etc) on it. Click on it.
In the bottom left of the screen you'll see a fader for this channel with a couple of boxes above the fader. These tell you where the signal is being "routed" to and from. The top one is the input, where the sound is coming from, an the one below is the output telling you where it's being played out of.
So set the input on the channel to Input 1. (if you can't see these boxes and the fader or "The Channel Strip" press 2 and you'll see the entire mixer) Then on that channel press the "rec" button right at the bottom of the channel strip.
This now means that channel and that channel only are ready to record with. If you are still not getting a level on the meter in logic, or sound coming through you probably need to look at the setup.
Go to the logic preference for Audio. Click on "Drivers" and make sure it's all set to your internal sound module, and everything seems to be ON, if you want to be able to hear the sound of your bass through the computer itself make sure the "Software Monitoring" check box is lit.
Logic takes a little bit more setting up to get it to do what you want but thats because it's capable of so much, you have to tell it what one of it's many talents to use. Where as garageband is far simpler.
If this doesn't help then you must be way off. Try taking a look at the thread i wrote called "Basic Tips for New Users" it details everything I just said above and more.

Similar Messages

  • Using a digi003 mixer with logic

    i just purchase logic the other day and i cant figure out how to use my digi003 mixing board with it. does logic even support the digi003? the guy at sam ash told me that it did.

    Ok - select an audio track in Logic. In it's channel strip, in the Input box, select the first input that Logic says your system sees.
    Click on either the red record enable button, or the yellow input monitor button. Play your source through the mixer - do you get levels in Logic? If not, repeat for whatever other inputs are available in the input menu.
    If none of those pass signal, then you need to look at the routing setup on the Alesis mixer to make sure you are routing signals correctly. Unfortunately I don't know that particular device, but check it's manual for how to route channels to the computer.

  • Anyone using a Behringer BCF2000 w/ Logic Express??

    I'd sure like to get my hands on a decent control unit and the Behringer BCF2000 fits the bill and the budget. I was curious if anyone here is using this unit and could tell me how easy it is to setup in Logic.
    Thanks,
    Brad

    I use the BCF2000 with Logic Express, and it works perfectly. Fortunately, since the firmware update (available on the Behringer homepage), the BCF2000 supports emulation of Logic Control, meaning you get to save yourself a lot of hassle assigning the individual knobs. Personally, I'd recommend it, since it seems to be the only control surface that offers nice features for reasonable pricing. My only problem is that the faders aren't touch-sensitive, meaning you sometimes have to fight with them if you've got automation data. Apart from that, great piece of equipment to have.
    Hope that helps,
    IKEA

  • Logic Pro 7 Mix Bus -- Mixing in Logic Pro 7.0 -- Something is wrong

    Ok, Maybe its just me, or my crappy audio interface, or both. anyways, heres my issue.
    Heres the scenario,
    I have approx 30 tracks, a handful of exs's, eq's on most channels, everything is fine, the track is sounding great and i cant complain. I have done many mixes with a modest amount of tracks 30-60 tracks and they sound great.....
    however,
    I am working on this one song that is pushing close to 100 tracks. the mac is holding up nicely, however.... there are parts in the song where i have many elements playing simultaneously. The recordings sound good when solo'd. nice level, minimal eq, very light compression if needed.
    when i let all the tracks play together, my mix sounds like crap.....it sounds so smashed, colorless, lifeless, kinda dead sounding. as if it had no depth.
    I have never had this problem before. I have mixed lots of music in logic pro 7.
    I feel as if all the calculated numbers in the mix bus are not adding up correctly.
    MY AUDIO INTERFACE...
    Digi Mbox2
    yes i know, IMHO its a POS
    I am forced to have it because there are still some PT sessions that i need access to,
    I want an Apogee Ensemble
    anyways
    has anyone ever had a mixbus issue?
    am i gonna have to take this project to an PTHD room?
    or perhaps a good analog mixroom?
    there have been quite a few mixes that i have done on this system that went straight to the mastering lab and then published...
    this track is kickin me in my a$$
    Thanks
    Nicktunez Inc
    G5quad 10GBram 2x250GBHDD   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   mbox2, BigKnob, Gen1031a, NS10s

    jord, hi, yes i used to use them heaps, but the arrangements and track count were smaller as well.
    unfortunately, when you have to sub grp many more sections for an orchestra as well i noticed a degradation in sound from them to the summing buss.
    i checked all the ADC settings and so on.
    so i reverted to trk > stereo sum.
    i use groups to control sub levels.
    i sort of liken this to the similar use on an analog console.
    when trkg, we'd use the monitor mixer and the main chnl strps would be used for mix down.
    to me, it was quite noticable that the quality changed/dropped when the main chnl strps were used. one or two were ok, but 40 became too colored.
    the monitor mixer was less complex with less circuitry. cleaner.
    this is where i stopped using eq a lot, mid 70s, and now i focus on well recorded sounds first.
    anyway, i sure this wouldn't worry most people.

  • Can anyone tell me the how to use the "ducking" process in Logic Pro 8?

    Howdy,
    I've tried following the directions in the manual but I just can figure out the steps necessary to use the ducking process in Logic 8. For those who aren't sure what ducking is it's for instance, when you want a guitar track's volume to be reduced when a vocal track is active. As an example, there is a way to trigger the volume reduction in the guitar track(s) using a compressor in the vocal track. Whenever the singer is singing it automatically reduces the volume in the guitar track. I'm just not sure how to do this. Any help with the steps involved would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Mark

    Well, the theory is you run say, the mix , through the 'ducker' or as I like to call it, the 'motherducker', then you simply sidechain say, a kick drum. That is to say, you route your kick to a bus or aux channel, preferably routed to a different output, then assign that bus or aux as your sidechain input in the ducker. The theory is that the through signal will duck on receipt of the sidechained kick.
    Frustratingly, this ducker is the buggiest thing since a bug landed on a buggy while loading it into the back of a VW bug. It just doesn't work. well it works for a bit and then stops working. Or the kick comes through the ducker as well. Or some other manifestation of complete crapness. Come on Apple, sort it out - it's the sound that everybody wants!
    Sorry Mark L1

  • Sony Tape Deck-Behringer Mixer  UB 802 interface

    I'm having a problem obtaining the audio in Garage Band from the Sony Tape deck I have connected to the Behringer UB 802 mixer connected to my Mac.
    On the mixer I have a jack output from the main output to the Audio line-in of the Mac.
    Whats odd is that with my microphone connected to the mixer, I have no problem obtaining audio in Garage Band . The only problem I have is with the Sony Tape deck (TC-D5) trying to obtain audio. I'm using an analogue tape deck.
    Thanks in advance to anyone who has any helpful insight in obtaining an audio feed in Garage Band from a tape deck via
    The Behringer UB802 mixer.
    John
    Mac Pro 2.66 GHZ, 1 GB RAM, 250 GB HD Mac OS X (10.4.9) Garage Band 3, Behringer UB802 Mixer, Sony TC-D5 tape deck
    Mac Pro 2.66 GHZ, 1 GB RAM, 250 GB HD   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   Garafge Band 3, Behringer mixer UB 802, Sony Tape Deck TC-D5

    I have my mic/headphone combo plugged into the mic XLR connection of the Behringer mixer. I don't believe the Mac Pro has an internal microphone.
    Thanks for any help on getting this going. When connected to the line input of my Sony PC I have no problem obtaining the audio feed from the tape deck that is connected to the mixer via the two RCA tape-in plugs.

  • Headphone Mixes from Logic

    I am considering rationalising my studio to a mixerless set up ( see Jim Frazier's comments in a recent thread http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=8174674#8174674)
    I bring live projects from studios and add over dubs such as vocals, horns, percussion etc. I have a simple headphone monitoring system which is perfect for up to 4 musicians to record to what is already in Logic - say a horn section and percussionist.
    So far all monitoring in my set up has run from the mixing desk which is the hub of all the inputs and outputs via a loom to my MOTU 828 - but my ideas have been opened up by comments such as Jim's ( see above thread) where he describes an essentially mixerless set up involving such devices as a Mackie Big Knob or Presonus + an Apogee Ensemble + A control Surface ( Mackie or Euphonix type thing)
    I have 3 questions:
    i) Practically speaking what is the best way to plug mics and line inputs into the back of the audio interface. Do most 'mixerless' studios use some kind of rack patch bay.. or am I exaggerating the hassle of having to lean over a rack where the inputs for mic are facing the wrong way?
    ii) Is it practical and easy to create separate software mixes ( say one for horn section and one for percussionist) in Logic and route them to headphones via outputs of the Presonus/Mackie Big Knob type studio control box? Do you use Software Monitoring and is latency an issue here?
    iii) Could someone just confirm the basic bits of gear that one needs to do this: ie Mac + Audio Interface + Patch Bay (?) + Studio Control Box + Control Surface
    many thanks to anyone who can contribute
    m s

    Hi ms,
    I'd be curious what the other "mixerless" guys are doing as well, but I can tell you how I'm managing things here.
    In my studio, I have dedicated mic pres, so I don't plug my mics into an audio interface. The mics get plugged from the mic preamps right to the converters, which in my case, is a Apogee Rosetta 800, as well as Lavry 4496's.
    I have XRL jacks out in the studio, and these jacks have their cable run through the wall, and into the control room, where they terminate to a patch bay. I also have the ins and outs of my mic pres, and hardware compressors coming up at the patch bay, as well as the I/O's of my converters. Basically, any piece of gear in my control room with an input and output is set-up to be available at the patch bays.
    So when I plug a mic into the XLR wall jack out in the studio, I simply connect patch cables at the patch bay, to designate whatever signal flow I want for that session. This is how the "big" studios have done it for decades, and once you take the time and money to set this up, you'll kick yourself for not doing it sooner.
    I too, do all overdubs here at my studio, Any live tracking with a rhythm section, is always done elsewhere. But aside from me recording my own guitars, I too often work with percussionists, horn sections, string players, and vocal groups, sometimes as many as 6 to 8 singers at a time.
    My solution for having separate headphone mixes without a mixer was to get a dedicated headphone system. I ended up going with the Hear Technologies Hear Back system.
    http://www.heartechnologies.com/hb/hearbackintro.htm
    This system can send something like ten different audio paths to the Hearback satellite mixers, where the talent out in the studio can customize their mix to their hearts content. However, I don't ever give anyone THAT much control . I keep it pretty simple... a stereo mix of the track, a "more me" knob, so they can control their voice or instrument level within the track, and I also give a reverb send, so they can add reverb to their voice or instrument, without me ever having to hear it in the control room.
    This system is fed from the separate outputs of my converters, and my Logic template that all songs start from is set-up so that all my Aux tracks are feeding this headphone hub in the manner I described above. So all routing does take place from within Logic.
    I do monitor with software monitoring on, but it wasn't until I got the Apogee Symphony system that I was able to do that reliably. Before the Apogee system, I used the Total mix latency free software that came with my RME FF800, much like the cue mix software that came with your MOTU piece. But monitoring in software outside of Logic always felt "left footed" to me. I MUCH prefer the DAW work like a tape machine as far as that aspect goes.
    And I do have to admit, it's finally nice to be able monitor through Logic, in real time, with no perceivable latency at all. I went 6 years without a mixer, waiting for technology to allow this type of performance from a native system. The Apogee Symphony card along with the 8 core MacPro finally got me there.
    And as I mentioned in that thread you linked to, I use a Presonus Central Station as talkback to the talent, as well as a master control room volume knob, and speaker selector.
    All in all, it's working out really, really well.
    I will say though, that having a dedicated hardware mixer is not necessarily a "bad" thing, and until you have a system where latency THROUGH Logic is basically undetectable, I would move slowly, and cautiously. It's imperative that the talent be able to hear their instrument or voice as they are used to. Any detectable latency, even a small amount, WILL deteriorate a performance, no matter what any body tries to tell you. And, it makes your studio appear "semi-pro".
    Latency free software like Cue Mix or Total Mix can make the mixerless studio a reality though, when throughput latency is detectable. It worked for me for years.
    If I can answer any more questions, don't hesitate to ask...

  • USB mixer and Logic Studios

    I am curious how Logic Studios would see a USB mixer. Does it see the entire mixer as one input or each channel on the mixer separately. For example, if I used a regular mixer and hooked it into the microphone jack, everything coming from that mixer would be one single signal. Does a USB mixer work the same way, or does the software see each channel separately. For example, could I put an effect on only one channel without effecting the others? I am slowly piecing together a little mini recording studio and this would help me determine whether it is worth the extra money to get a USB mixer. Does a USB mixer off any other benefits over a regular mixer?

    Hi,
    Which mixer are looking to use?
    Have you read that mixers' manual yet?
    That more than anything in this forum, will answer your question.
    Cheers

  • Can we use WHO columns in Business Logic implementation

    Hi,
    Can we use WHO columns for business logic implementation..?
    From one table I need to pick up the latest record. I have a ActionDate column in the table which stores the date of the action.
    But on the same day there can be multiple action records. ie Multiple records have same ActionDate.
    Select * from action_table where action_date=(maximum action_date)
    The above query will return more than 1 record.
    Now can I use the Creation_Date which is a WHO column to identify the latest record..?
    Will it introduce any issues if I use creation_date WHO column?
    Usage of WHO column in application logic, Is it against the Standards ?
    Thanks a lot.

    I guess you are talking about populating the value using the history column creation_dt from EO.
    If so, you can use then. We are using them in all our applications to populate WHO columns of our table.
    Infact as far as I know, even Oracle application uses them.
    They generally populate the timestamp, so you may need to format them when doing date comparisons.
    Hope that helps.
    Amit

  • How to SIMPLY use the %DIMENSION_TO_SET% variables into logic scripts

    hello,
    I'm using a prompt of type "COPYMOVE" or "COPYMOVEINPUT". In this type of prompt, there are 2 columns of dimension members list, one for defining the "source zone" and one for defining the "target zone" of logics.
    The left colum of the prompt (for source zone) feeds the variables %DIMENSION_SET% : %ACCOUNT_SET%, %ENTITY_SET%, %CATEGORY_SET%, etc...and these variables can be used in the logic scripts in *XDIM_MEMBERSET instructions for example.
    The right colum of the prompt feeds the variables %DIMENSION_TO_SET% : %ACCOUNT_TO_SET%, %ENTITY_TO_SET%, %CATEGORY_TO_SET%, etc...and I don't know how to SIMPLY use these variables in the logic scripts.
    I've found a tricky way to do that but I meet 2 problems :
    - it is complicated
    - the multi-info instruction (BEGININFO/ENDINFO) seems to be bugged as blank lines are added all the time in the code and sometimes I have to wait for minutes when I try to modifiy the package code through BPC for excel eData/modify package menu.
    So the question is how to SIMPLY get the %DIMENSION_TO_SET% variables into logic scripts and use them ? Thanks, R.
    Here is the tricky package code I use at this time (I build one function for each %DIMENSION_TO_SET% variable and I pass these functions to the logic) :
    PROMPT(COPYMOVE,,,,"ACCDETAIL,ACCOUNT,CATEGORY,DATASRC,ENTITY,TIME,YEARS")
    TASK(Execute formulas,USER,WS-WW\PlauchuR)
    TASK(Execute formulas,APPSET,US)
    TASK(Execute formulas,APP,SV)
    TASK(Execute formulas,SELECTION,D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\US\SV\PrivatePublications\PlauchuR\TempFiles\FROM_1561_.TMP)
    TASK(Execute formulas,TOSELECTION,D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\US\SV\PrivatePublications\PlauchuR\TempFiles\TO_1561_.TMP)
    BEGININFO(%FSS%)
    *FUNCTION TARGETACCDETAIL=%ACCDETAIL_TO_SET%
    *FUNCTION TARGETACCOUNT=%ACCOUNT_TO_SET%
    *FUNCTION TARGETCATEGORY=%CATEGORY_TO_SET%
    *FUNCTION TARGETDATASRC=%DATASRC_TO_SET%
    *FUNCTION TARGETENTITY=%ENTITY_TO_SET%
    *FUNCTION TARGETTIME=%TIME_TO_SET%
    *FUNCTION TARGETYEARS=%YEARS_TO_SET%
    ENDINFO
    TASK(Execute formulas,FORMULASCRIPT,%FSS%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,LOGICFILE,D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\US\SV
    ..\AdminApp\SV\_TEST.Lgf)
    TASK(Execute formulas,RUNMODE,1)
    TASK(Execute formulas,LOGICMODE,1)
    Edited by: ALEXANDRE BEDIER on Jun 16, 2010 3:15 PM

    hello,
    finally I've discovered that there is no need of BEGININFO instruction.
    One can pass several functions to a logic with one FORMULASCRIPT task. The functions definitions have to be separated by instructions. See below :
    PROMPT(COPYMOVEINPUT,%FTARGETS%,,"select source and target zone for category and datasource.","ACCDETAIL,ACCOUNT,CATEGORY,DATASRC,ENTITY,TIME,YEARS")
    TASK(Execute formulas,FORMULASCRIPT,*FUNCTION TACCDETAIL=%ACCDETAIL_TO_SET% *FUNCTION TACCOUNT=%ACCOUNT_TO_SET% *FUNCTION TCATEGORY=%CATEGORY_TO_SET% *FUNCTION TDATASRC=%DATASRC_TO_SET% *FUNCTION TENTITY=%ENTITY_TO_SET% *FUNCTION TTIME=%TIME_TO_SET% *FUNCTION TYEARS=%YEARS_TO_SET%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,USER,%USER%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,APPSET,%APPSET%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,APP,%APP%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,SELECTION,%SELECTIONFILE%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,LOGICFILE,%APPPATH%\..\AdminApp\%APP%\_TEST.LGF)
    TASK(Execute formulas,RUNMODE,1)
    TASK(Execute formulas,LOGICMODE,1)
    Then one will be able to use the functions TACCDETAIL, TCATEGORY, TACCOUNT,... in the logic script.
    Edited by: ALEXANDRE BEDIER on Jun 24, 2010 10:31 AM
    Edited by: ALEXANDRE BEDIER on Jun 24, 2010 10:33 AM

  • We are recording 2 voices over an instrumental track. Every time there is a rest in the vocal part the volume of the instrumental track noticeable increases. Is this fixable? We are using Alesis multi mix 8 with 2 microphones.

    We are recording 2 voices over an instrumental track. Every time there is a rest in the vocal part the volume of the instrumental track noticeable increases. Is this fixable? We are using Alesis multi mix 8 with 2 microphones.

    Badger33rk wrote:
    Every time there is a rest in the vocal part the volume of the instrumental track noticeable increases.
    turn the Ducking menuItem off

  • Using time machine to backup Logic Projects

    Hi
    I was wondering if it is possible to use time machine to backup my Logic Projects. I have a seperate internal drive that I use to keep all my user data on, like my Logic projects. I want to use time machine to back up these projects onto a external firewire drive.
    Can timemachine only backup your systems drive and therefore I would need to have my Logic projects based stored on it?

    Yes - time machine can back up any drive. I am using 3 drives: system drive, a USB2 drive for Time machine backups and a firewire 800 drive for Logic Studio projects, instruments, samples, audio, etc. TM backs up my system and FW drives to the USB drive.
    Time machine options (in system preferences) allow you to exclude/include drives so you just need to set it to include your second internal drive.
    The only thing I'm not sure of is whether this effects the loop browser. Oddly, when I was experimenting with using aliases for Apple loops, Logic actually found the TM backup files when it couldn't locate the original GB loops! After some file moving and index deleting I cleared all loops but now I have duplicate entries again in Logic - possibly due to TM, but I have not verified this.
    -Scott

  • I there, my question is quite simple, I would like to know if the "apple remote control" can be used with a mac mini and , if so, it can be used to control also the "logic pro" functions (e.g. record, start, stop etc). Thks a lot, Danilo

    I there, my question is quite simple, I would like to know if the "apple remote control" can be used with a mac mini and , if so, it can be used to control also the "logic pro" functions (e.g. record, start, stop etc). Thks a lot, Danilo

    Good work, thanks for the report.

  • The interface you are trying to use is related to a logical schema that no

    "The interface you are trying to use is related to a logical schema that no longer exists"
    I'm facing this error when importing a project on Designer connect to a new work repository.
    I have an TEST Data Integrator environment and now I need to move objects already created to a new DEV environment. I've created a new master and work repository with distinct ID's according note https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=130:14:4335668333625114484::::p14_database_id,p14_docid,p14_show_header,p14_show_help,p14_black_frame,p14_font:NOT,423815.1,1,1,1,helvetica
    Any ideas?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Nothing occurs. My steps:
    1) Export Master Repository from 1st environment (topoloy -> export master repository)
    2) Create Master Repository on 2nd environment (through repcreate.bat)
    3) Export Topology (1st environment)
    4) Export all projects (1st environment)
    5) Import Topology (2nd environemtn) ----> com.sunopsis.core.n: This import action has been cancelled because it could damage your repository (problem with the identifier sequences)
    Is this sequence of operations correct?
    Thanks

  • Should i use a separate HDD for Logic?

    I've read some info that using a separate drive for Logic improves performance, so it is an option I am thinking of taking. BUT does having an external drive connected via firewire800 actually outperform the internal drive (performing all tasks) connected by SATAII?
    Should I keep Logic Pro and all it's loops etc on the main/os drive with just the projects on an external one?
    or, install Logic on the external drive?
    Also, I'm wondering if my 2008 2.4GHz 20' iMac can have 2 internal drives installed, possibly small SSDs?
    Message was edited by: Miles Allen

    Hi,
    it is most convenient to have an external 7.200 RPM firewire 800 drive for recording audio (or even better a second internal within a Mac Pro ), while keeping Logic installed on the System drive (you won't be able to install Logic elsewhere, anyhow). You could, however, install some of Logic's additional content on an external drive if HD space is an issue, but that has nothing to do with recording performance.
    For heavy audio recording, keep the drive you want to record to a dedicated drive.
    SSD is nice, but expensive. Think twice if you really, really need it.
    Fox

Maybe you are looking for