Using "Error Correction"

When importing a CD using “Apple Lossless Encoder” is ok to leave the preference set to “Use error correction when reading Audio CDs”? I know it slows the transfer down but is the quality compromised in any way? Even on pristine CDs?

I always use the error correction. The optical drive does it's own error correction, but the software takes it one step further. I don't see it reducing the speed of an import by a significant amount. But since you're clearly a major audiophile, it seems like you would rather be safe than sorry and do the error correction no matter how pristine you think your CDs are.

Similar Messages

Import Settings, Use error correction

I just read that the "Use error correction when reading Audio CDs" box in iTunes Import Settings should really be on, (even though it's slower).
on this page http://www.kenrockwell.com/apple/itunes.htm It's copyright 2006
Is this really the case?

Hi
An up for this topic.
Always the same question : use correction or not.
Nobody knows today how this function works (except Apple may be...)
When error correct is off : in case of problem, Is the player works like a cd player, creating a /making a new information or does he pass many times until having the good information.
When error correction is on : In case of problem what happend ? does he pass many times (thats why its slower...) until having the good information ?
The way is having bit perfect at the end even it is long...
An idea ?

ITunes Will Not Play Entire CDs Unless Error Correction Switched Off!

I was having problems with iTunes in that it would only play 2 tracks on a CD before iTunes froze and had to be Force Quit.
On the advice of a poster on this Apple Discussions Forum I went into: iTunes>Preferences>Advanced>Importing and unchecked the "Use error correction" button. Voila, my iTunes will now play complete CDs.
But surely this is not right? It has been suggested to me that this is a software issue and that I should carry out an archive and install of Leopard.
What do you think?

+4. Windows blue screen comes up to check the FAT32 drive to see if there are any errors. There is nothing.+
what numerical and text codes are you getting with it? (ie 0x[zeros/letters/numbers] CAPSANDUNDERSCORES)
if the blue screen mentions a specific file, let us know what that is called too. (exact spelling, please.)
here's a reference on the sorts of things i'm asking about:
Troubleshooting Windows Stop Messages

Error Correction for iTunes?

When importing CDs into iTunes there is an option for Use Error Correction. There is a minimal explanation under Help as to what it does but not as to how. Does anyone know how the Error Correction process works. Is there a check against a data base comparing the rip against others to verify accuracy? Any details you can provide is appreciated.
My interest in knowing is maintaining the highest quality and most accurate iTunes library possible.

found in another discussion on another forum:
David Charlap
Don Hurter asks what "Use error correction when reading Audio CDs" does.
Audio CDs have error correction codes on the disc, so that errors (like manufacturing defects, scratches, fingerprints, and even some copy protection schemes) can often be played through without corrupting the sound.
When you rip a CD, the computer reads the raw audio data from the disc. Typically, it just reads the audio samples and ignores the error-correction codes, assuming that the data will be good. This means that if there are any errors on the disc, those errors will become defects in the sound (typically heard as pops or clicks.)
When you turn on the "use error correction" feature, iTunes will process the error correcting codes along with the audio samples, using them to correct any errors it finds. If your computer is fast enough (relative to the drive's audio-extraction speed), you won't notice a slowdown (but you may notice an increase in CPU usage.) If the computer is not that fast, using error correction will slow down the ripping.
JGG

'You Are Not Using The Correct Type of Phone Cord' Error

Having a issue with my fax on my HP Officejet Pro 8500 wireless. Tried to send a fax, it received a send error. I ran fax test and it came back with "You are not using the correct type of phone cord". Nothing has changed since I last fax'd but I check the lines and connection, everything appears ok. Phone jack is connected to 1-line and Officejet '2-ext' is connected to the phone. I use a dedicated phone # and the Officejet is set to auto answer. I can call out and receive calls on the phone connect to the Officejet. My assumption is that since I can use the phone without issue there is nothing wrong with the phone line. Any ideas?
This question was solved.
View Solution.

I was having the same problem. I'm using a the 2 wire phone cord provided with the printer and still getting this error. Turns out that it related to have a phone extension plugged into the printer. If I unplug the telephone form the extension jack on the back of the printer, then the fax test passes. I was even using a 2 wire cord on the phone extension but it seems that simply having a telephone plugged into the extension jack will cause this error.
Run the test without a telephone plugged into the printer's extension jack and you should be fine.
Worked for me!

@Return - Help with displaying error correctly

Hi,
I'm trying to use the @Return function to block users from entering a negative value in the 'FTE' member of the 'F T E' dimension. When I run the below from Business Rules menu it displays the error correctly in a window. However when I run when it's attached to a webform which I need, the error displays as:
Error Detected while attempting to run job: AAA - Non Discretionary Allocation - Budget.
ADF_FACES-60097: For more information, please see the servers' error log for an entry beginning with: ADF_FACES-60096:Server Exception during PPR, #3
So my question is why does it work perfectly from Business Rules menu but not from the Webforms?
Fix ( "No FTE" )
         "512100" (
         If(@ISMBR("8900"))
         If("FTE" < 0)
         @RETURN( @CONCATENATE(
                             @CONCATENATE("Negative values are not allowed as input into the dimension 'F T E' for member:[", @NAME(@CURRMBR("F T E"))),
                             "]. Please input a value greater or equal to zero to continue.")
         , ERROR);
        ELSE
         @Round("FTE" * "Avg School Principal Salary"->"No Dept"->"Preliminary (Rolled)"->"No Fund"->"No Program",-2);
         Endif Endif )

Is that your real script? If you are only looking at "No FTE" (assuming it is from "F T E" dimension) why currmbr?
What is 8900 and 512100 are they accounts? If so why are you opening 512100 and checking for 8900?
If I were you and trying something like this and hit and error, I would try to put a value and see if that works or not. So if FTE<0 put 1 else put the formula.
Regards
Celvin

G/L account 400044 cannot be used - Error

Hi All,
Could you please get me a solution on the following scenario where the G/L Account has been created in the CoA and Ccode and been correctly assigned in OBYC But,the following error occurs when I create a PR..
G/L account 400044 cannot be used (please correct)
Message no. ME045
Diagnosis
Comparison of the field selection strings from the G/L account 400044 and the account assignment category K reveals that there is an incompatible combination of field selections for the field selection group 'Earmarked Funds'.
The G/L account field selection is stored in table T004F; that for the account assignment is stored in table T162K.
Procedure
Please enter a correct G/L account
Regards,
Deepak.

Hi
Goto FS00 and enter the GL account and select create/Bank/interest tab and identify the FSG.
Goto OBC4 and select above FSG and goto Additional account assignments and check the field earmarked funds field status
Goto Tcode OME9 and select K and check the status fo the field.
Both are different.
Cheers
Srinivas

G/L account 156116 cannot be used (please correct)

Dear all,
When i create a PO from a PR (of Third party sale process), i get an error:
G/L account 156116 cannot be used (please correct)
Message no. ME045
Diagnosis
Comparison of the field selection strings from the G/L account 156116 and the account assignment category X reveals that there is an incompatible combination of field selections for the field selection group 'CO/PP order'.
The G/L account field selection is stored in table T004F; that for the account assignment is stored in table T162K.
Pls give me your suggestion.
Thanks,

> G/L account 156116 cannot be used (please correct)
> Message no. ME045
Go to FS00 and Select your Account and In Create / Bank / Interest Tab Double Click on Field Status group and Check the Business area Field is Set to Optional Entry. (If its set Dont Change any thing)
Now Go to OME9 and Select your Account Assignment X and Double Click and Check the Business area is set to Optional Entry. (If its Not Set then Change the Same and Save)
Logic is Both Business area Settings should be Same.
Regards,
Ashok

5C00 error correction on MG8120

Can I fix error 5C00 on my MG8120?

Okay so last night was a really interesting adventure in DV land. I found out more than I ever thought I would ever want to know about DV (wiki dv to see) and HDV. I guess error correction is an on-tape thing and the error correction never makes it to FCP (the camera doesn't send it, but uses it to fix the signal before it gets sent out via firewire). I was capturing from camera to Macbook then straight to a firewire drive I had (my macbook is basically a "pass-thru"). Turns out the problem was a bent or broken wire in the cable itself (we finally put it on a multitester and I forget which, but one of the wires was giving us a lot of resistance). New cable = no more lost frames.
I want to thank everyone for their helpful questions, you got me thinking in the right direction.

Error Correction doesn't work

Using WIn Vista, AMD AM2 6000+
This is a fresh install (actually tried twice incase it was a problem with the Vista install). I can't load ANY cd with error correction on and with it off, I get skipps in the files.
iTunes version 7.3.1.3
It works great in XP

Using WIn Vista, AMD AM2 6000+
This is a fresh install (actually tried twice incase it was a problem with the Vista install). I can't load ANY cd with error correction on and with it off, I get skipps in the files.
iTunes version 7.3.1.3
It works great in XP

Error correction

Can anyone recommend an error correction programme which I can download and use with itunes? I find itunes own error correction does not always work and downloaded tracks which were fine on the CD, skip once downloaded.

If you don't mind MP3s you could use Windows Media player or Real Player. I used to get pretty good results with Realplayer when I used the MP3 format. Now I stick with AAC I get good results with iTunes.
But there is plenty of ripping software out there, I haven't tried any thing else myself, but I guess others will have recommendations.
I forgot to mention that error correction can itself introduce problems and is best left off unless needed.
Message was edited by: polydorus

Generating BCH Codes for Forward Error Correction

Has anybody created VIs for generating BCH (Bose-Chaudhuri-Hochquenghem) error correction codes?
I need to generate the codes for a 16 bit data packet.
I've found samples in C on the web (http://www.eccpage.com/) but nothing in LV.
Thanks,
-dave

I hate to bump a topic that is over 6 years old, but I am in need of a simple BCH encoding algorithm and do not have the toolbox which provides this. I only need the encoding algorithm so I am hoping to implement this .VI posted here.
I have slightly altered the cleaned up version that was posted to have the inputs/outputs in a format that I expect, but I am worried that it is not correctly calculating the BCH code. This is my first time working with BCH codes, but I need to implement the CCSDS version using n = 63, k = 56 7-bit BCH code with generator polynomial G(x) = x^7 + x^6 + x^2 + 1.
I think when using 0xC5C5C5C5C5C5C5 as my input message the 7 bit BCH is supposed to be 0x43, but I am getting 0x00. Could someone with more experience than me see if I did something obviously wrong? Or know of a way to validate a BCH encoding algorithm, so I know if what I did was correct. I attached my modeified .vi. Thanks!
Attachments:
BCH_3.vi ‏24 KB

Is it possible that my update stats used only correct tables?

Whenever there is a schedule maintenance run I receive a error:
Executing the query "UPDATE STATISTICS [Perf].[PerfHourly_F65954CD35A54..." failed with the following error: "Table 'PerfHourly_F65954CD35A549E886A48E53F148F277' does not exist.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet"
property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly.
Is it possible that my update stats used only correct tables?
Thanks

Use below script ...(change if required)
USE [dbname]
go
DECLARE @mytable_id INT
DECLARE @mytable VARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @owner VARCHAR(128)
DECLARE @SQL VARCHAR(256)
SELECT @mytable_id = MIN(object_id)
FROM sys.tables WITH(NOLOCK)
WHERE is_ms_shipped = 0
WHILE @mytable_id IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
SELECT @owner = SCHEMA_NAME(schema_id), @mytable = name
FROM sys.tables
WHERE object_id = @mytable_id
SELECT @SQL = 'UPDATE STATISTICS '+ QUOTENAME(@owner) +'.' + QUOTENAME(@mytable) +' WITH ALL, FULLSCAN;'
Print @SQL
EXEC (@SQL)
SELECT @mytable_id = MIN(object_id)
FROM sys.tables WITH(NOLOCK)
WHERE object_id > @mytable_id
  AND is_ms_shipped = 0
END
Or use below for required table only but it will not execute only generate script, make change as per ur requirements:
SELECT X.*,
ISNULL(CASE
    WHEN X.[Total Rows]<=1000
    THEN
      CASE
        WHEN [Percent Modified] >=20.0
        THEN 'UPDATE STATISTICS ' + [Schema Name] + '.' + [Table Name] + ' WITH ALL, FULLSCAN --20% Small Table Rule'
      END
    WHEN [Percent Modified] = 100.00
    THEN 'UPDATE STATISTICS ' + [Schema Name] + '.' + [Table Name]     + ' WITH ALL, FULLSCAN --100% No real Stats Rule'
    --WHEN X.[Rows Modified] > 1000
    --THEN 'UPDATE STATISTICS ' + [Schema Name] + '.' + [Table Name]     + ' WITH ALL, FULLSCAN --1000 Rows Modified Rule'
    ELSE
      CASE
        WHEN X.[Total Rows] > 1000000000 --billion rows
        THEN CASE
               WHEN [Percent Modified] > 0.1
               THEN 'UPDATE STATISTICS ' + [Schema Name] + '.' + [Table Name]     + ' WITH ALL, FULLSCAN -- 1B Big Table Rule'
             END
        WHEN X.[Total Rows] > 100000000 --hundred million rows
        THEN CASE
               WHEN [Percent Modified] > 1.0
               THEN 'UPDATE STATISTICS ' + [Schema Name] + '.' + [Table Name]     + ' WITH ALL, FULLSCAN -- 100M Big Table Rule'
             END
        WHEN X.[Total Rows] > 10000000   --ten million rows
        THEN CASE
               WHEN [Percent Modified] > 2.0
               THEN 'UPDATE STATISTICS ' + [Schema Name] + '.' + [Table Name]     + ' WITH ALL, FULLSCAN -- 10M Big Table Rule'
             END
        WHEN X.[Total Rows] > 1000000    --million rows
        THEN CASE
               WHEN [Percent Modified] > 5.0
               THEN 'UPDATE STATISTICS ' + [Schema Name] + '.' + [Table Name]     + ' WITH ALL, FULLSCAN -- 1M Big Table Rule'
             END
        WHEN X.[Total Rows] > 100000     --hundred thousand rows
        THEN CASE
               WHEN [Percent Modified] > 10.0
               THEN 'UPDATE STATISTICS ' + [Schema Name] + '.' + [Table Name]     + ' WITH ALL, FULLSCAN -- 100K Big Table Rule'
             END
        WHEN X.[Total Rows] > 10000      --ten thousand rows
        THEN CASE
               WHEN [Percent Modified] > 20.0
               THEN 'UPDATE STATISTICS ' + [Schema Name] + '.' + [Table Name]     + ' WITH ALL, FULLSCAN -- 10K Big Table Rule'
             END
        END
END,'') AS [Statistics SQL]
FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT
        DB_NAME()   AS [Database],
        S.name      AS [Schema Name],
        T.name      AS [Table Name],
        I.rowmodctr AS [Rows Modified],
        P.rows      AS [Total Rows],
        CASE
          WHEN I.rowmodctr > P.rows
          THEN 100
          ELSE CONVERT(decimal(8,2),((I.rowmodctr * 1.0) / P.rows * 1.) * 100.0)
        END AS [Percent Modified]
FROM
        sys.partitions P
        INNER JOIN sys.tables T ON P.object_Id = T.object_id
        INNER JOIN sys.schemas S ON T.schema_id = S.schema_id
        INNER JOIN sysindexes I ON P.object_id = I.id
WHERE P.index_id in (0,1)
AND I.rowmodctr > 0
) X
WHERE [Rows Modified] > 1000
ORDER BY [Rows Modified] DESC
Please click "Propose As Answer"
if a post solves your problem, or "Vote As Helpful" if a post has been useful
to you

Reg. G/L account 221004 cannot be used (please correct)

Dear All
In our IDES system I am trying to raise Process order with E & L combination,If I do so,the following error occured.
Please help me.
"G/L account 221004 cannot be used (please correct)
Message no. ME045
Diagnosis
Comparison of the field selection strings from the G/L account 221004 and the account assignment category E reveals that there is an incompatible combination of field selections for the field selection group 'Earmarked Funds'.
The G/L account field selection is stored in table T004F; that for the account assignment is stored in table T162K.
Procedure
Please enter a correct G/L account."
Thanks
Rajakumar

Hi:
It seems that Fund Management has been activited.Please consult your FICO Consultant.
You may have to change the GL Account or deactivate Fund Management.
Please let me know if you need more information.
Assign points if necessary.
Regards
MSReddy

G/L account 200010 cannot be used (please correct) Message no. ME045

HI All,
When I am trying to create PO for purchasing an asset from MM, I am getting below error.
I have chosen "A" in Account Assingment Category and given Asset number.
GL 200010 is APC GL Account defined corrected.
G/L account 200010 cannot be used (please correct)
Message no. ME045
Diagnosis
Comparison of the field selection strings from the G/L account 200010 and the account assignment category A reveals that there is an incompatible combination of field selections for the field selection group 'Asset number / subnumber'.
The G/L account field selection is stored in table T004F; that for the account assignment is stored in table T162K.
Procedure
Please enter a correct G/L account.
Can you pls advice me.
Niranjan Yandamuri
Edited by: Yandamuri Niranjan on Jan 14, 2012 7:57 AM

Dear expert
The message ME045 is raised whenever there is an inconsistency between the G/L account field selection setup in table T004F and the account assignment field selection setup in table T162K. This is same as explained in the long text of the error message.
Please re-check the following:
Adjust the field status definition of table T162K to the field selection in Financial Accounting (table T004F). Proceed as follows:
1. Determine the item of the field in question in the field selection string. You obtain this information from table TMODU, in the 'MODIF' column in transaction SE16.
2. Edit table T162K using transaction SM31 and change the position of the field status definition in question. An optional entry '.' might be a good starting point in many cases.
Or better
Please, kindly try this:
.- In transaction FS03 check for the relevant G/L account number and the relevant Company Code, the Field Status Group (under the tab for 'Create / bank / interest').
.- For this Field Status Group and Company Code check the customizing transaction OBC4.Under the 'Additional account assignments' group see the setting maintained.
.- Now check with OME9 for your account assignment category 'A'
Are these two settings the same ones? Just in case, please set both of them to 'Optional' and re-test the system behavior afterwards.
Re grads
Ajeesh.s

Using "Error Correction"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for