Validation of non-qualifier

Hello experts
I have a validation problem on my qualified table.
From the main table, containing customers I have a qualifier called Customer Numbers. It only has one non-qualifier called organization. It represents the internal organisation at the company and a customer can have different customer numbers depending on the organization.
Organizations can be: Org A, Org B etc.
Customer number is a text field.
Other qualifiers exist but they are not important for the validation.
I need to make sure that all customer numbers that are created have a text field that is not blank.
I can get it to work if there is only one qualified link but if I have several I'm not able to get a consistent satisfactory result.
This is an ok example:
Organization   Customer Number    Other data
Org A          12345              XYZ
Org B          67890              XYZ
Org A          67890              XYZ
This is not allowed since the customer number for org B is blank:
Organization   Customer Number    Other data
Org A          12345              XYZ
Org B                             XYZ
Org A          67890              XYZ
I have looked at [this thread|Validation Help; without luck.
I have also tried the HAS_ANY_VALUES() function but it doesn't seem to work with IS_NOT_NULL. Any help would be appreciated.
BR
/Alexander

>
Udya Jisna wrote:
> IF(IS_NULL(<qualifier:customer_number>), NOT(IS_NOT_NULL(<qualifier:customer_number>)), TRUE)
One thing to consider here is that the semantics of IS_NULL and IS_NOT_NULL have changed in MDM 5.5 SP06 (see page 4 of the release notes: https://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700001124542007E ). Therefore, the correct implementation depends on the MDM version you're using. If it's below SP06, you'll have to keep in mind to change the validation expression during an upgrade. If you're using SP06 (or already MDM 7.1), Udya's advice to use IS_NULL resp. IS_NOT_NULL should be the better way to go.
Best regards,
Dennis

Similar Messages

  • CS6 Design Standard Serial Number is valid, but a qualifying product could not be found...?

    I am attempting to reinstall CS6 Design Standard after a computer upgrade, however the Application Manager won't take my serial number.  In particular, when I enter the serial number, I receive the following error message:
    Serial Number you provided is valid, but a qualifying product could not be found on this computer.
    When I enter the serial number for one of the products that should be eligible for the upgrade, I receive the error message:
    This serial number is not for a qualifying product.  Please try another.
    I've attempted this on a couple of machines with the same result.  I've also attempted to install CS6 Design Standard after installing numerous other products: CS5 Design Premium, CS5 Design Standard, CS3 Design Standard... and none of these were found as qualifying products.
    I'm attempting this on OS X 10.9.3, on numerous MacBook Pro configurations from the past four years.  It is plugged into the network, and the connection is active.  I haven't seen anything in Console that is related.
    Is there someone from Adobe that I can contact to get verification of this Serial Number, and what product it would be attached to?
    Thanks,
    shane.

    The Serial Number you have is a upgrade Serial Number from a older version.
    So when you try to install, you have to insert the Serial Number for CS6 Design Standard and on the next screen, you need to choose the old product from drop down list and enter the Serial Number for that.
    It is not necessary to install the old application before installing CS6 Design Standard , all you need is the Serial Number for the old version.
    If still you have issue, you can contact the support as mentioned by Steve.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html

  • Trying to Reinstall CS6 Master "Serial Number you provided is valid, but a qualifying product could not be found on this computer"

    I re-downloaded CS6 after cleaning my computer and when I enter the Serial Number I get this message "Serial Number you provided is valid, but a qualifying product could not be found on this computer". From other posts I saw that someone contacted support but I can't find a number anywhere that I can call. Hoping someone can help me ASAP due to these programs being essential for my business.

    You can try contacting Support thru chat though I do not know if they are available on weekends.
    For the link below click the Still Need Help? option in the blue area at the bottom and choose the chat option...
    Serial number and activation chat support (non-CC)
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service1.html ( http://adobe.ly/1aYjbSC )

  • What is the need to combine non qualifiers during IMPORT

    Hi Experts,
    I want to know the need to combine the non qualifiers during import in the match records field.
    what is the significance of it?
    Thanks in advance.
    Sandhya.

    Hi Alex,
    Thanks for the reply.
    i need a small clarification about the same. as per my understanding the NON QUALIFIERS are text fields so how do they effect the value in the qualified fields? or should the NON Qualifiers be lookup fileds (in your example company code and Plant)
    Case 1 - if the Non qualifiers are of type lookup:
    Then based on the combination of the qualifiers how can we define the valid values in the qualifier fields
    Eg: if company code is 2000 (where company code is Non qualifiers of type lookup) then the available dropdown value for plant field should only be P001 and P002 (Whare plant field is qualifier)
    Case 2: If the Non qualifiers are of type lookup :
    Then how does the value in the Non qualifier decide the available values in the Qualifiers. 
    Please help me understand the above two scenerios
    Regards,
    SS

  • "Schema validation found non-data type errors" error when passing a string value to date field in infopath

    Hi,
    I have an infopath web brower enabled form. In the form i have a date field.
    I am passing the data from the database to that field using the C# code.
    But, as the field from database is coming as string, i am getting an error, and i am not able to assign the value.
    I get the date value from database as "3/25/2011 12:00:00 AM"
    I used the below code:
    [CODE]
    if (objInfopathFormcData.myRecievedDate != null)
      myRoot.SelectSingleNode("/my:myFields/my:field97", NamespaceManager).SetValue(objInfopathFormcData.myRecievedDate);
    [/CODE]
    I am getting the error as "Schema validation found non-data type errors".
    How to set the value for a date field in Infopath.
    Thank you

    HI,
    I fixed it:
    Below code is used to fix:
    [CODE]
    XPathNavigator xfield = null;
    DateTime dtmyRecievedDate;
    dtmyRecievedDate = Convert.ToDateTime(objInfopathFormcData.myRecievedDate);
    if (objFormcData.FcCompletionDate != null)
    xfield = myRoot.SelectSingleNode("/my:myFields/my:field97", NamespaceManager);
    DeleteNil(xfield);
    xfield.SetValue(dtmyRecievedDate.GetDateTimeFormats().GetValue(5).ToString());
    // method to delete xsi:nil
    private void DeleteNil(XPathNavigator nav1)
    if (nav1.MoveToAttribute("nil", "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"))
       nav1.DeleteSelf();
    [/CODE]
    Thank you

  • How can we do the validation for non visible records in table control.

    Hi Experts,
      I have a table control which displays list of material details. I have a button to upload the material details from excel file to table control directly. I have to validate all the customers which are exist in the table. But my item (Material) table control displays only 5 rows i.e only 5 entries are visible in module pool screen. The validation is done for 5 records only in PAI event, but i need to do validation for rest of the records too (Which are not visible on items table), if validation fails then needs to display error message.
      How can we do the validation for non visible records in table control.
    Regards,
    Bujji

    Hi,
    try validating material before displaying it in table control...'
    Rgds/Abhhi

  • Values of Non-Qualifiers (lookups) not auto-converting.

    We've been trying to use Import Server to automatically import records (XML) that had data for qualified lookup tables. Apparently there is an issue with namespaces in both the schema that we mapped to and the source field.
    After removing the namespaces, we now have an issue with the non-qualifier that uses a lookup table not automapping it's values and thus retaining the compound field at the Customer main level.
    First, the Partner Function is mapped to the Partner Function flat lookup table. At this level, the value auto-converts and the green dot is visible to the left. 
    Second, at the Customer Partner qualified lookup, the Partner Function is again mapped to the Partner Function lookup. This time, however, the values do not automatically convert and the "AUTOMAP" button must be manually pushed for them to map. The other non-qualifiers (CustomerID, PartnerNum, PartnerSAP_ID) are also mapped and their values auto-convert (green dot).
    Finally, at the Customer main level, all of the non-qualified field from the Customer Partner table are mapped and all auto-convert except for the Partner Function field. This requires us to manually push "Automap". Then, and only then, does it allow us to right click on one of the fields and create the compound field to map to the Customer Partner field. Again, the value mapping is not automatic but must be done manually.
    This map is then saved and ImpMgr closed. When the IM is reopened with the same map, the compound field is not recreated due to the fact that the Partner Function values did not convert. Once these are redone manually, then and only then can the compound field be recreated and value mapped.
    When this same map is used in the Import Server, the error is that the qualified fields cannot be mapped. This brings us back to the lookup fields not value mapping. Likewise, if this same file is opened in Import Manager mannually, and the map applied, it STILL does not convert the values and the Compound Field for the Qualified L/Up table is dropped. 
    We are using MDM 5.5 SP4 Patch 3.

    Hello Christiane,
    Yes, this is a very important point and I should have noted it in my original post. Yes, my Default Batch Handling settings are:
      Yes - Automap unmapped values
      Add - Unmapped Value Handling
    Plus:
      Replace - Default multi-valued update
      Append - Deault qualified update
      None - Default matching qualifiers
    Also, in my mdis.ini file, my settings are:
      Automap Unmapped Value = True
      Unmapped Value Handling = Add
      Always Use Unmapped Value Handling = True
    It used to work when we were in SP4, Patch 2, but have since upgraded to Patch 3, Hotfix 2(?) and can't get it to work.
    Thanks for helping!
    Don

  • Validation for Non-AlphaNumeric characters

    Hi All,
    I want to do Validation for Non-Alpha Numeric characters.
    While saving record, Name should only allow alphanumeric(letters and numbers only) characters, No special characters.
    How to do this?
    Plz help
    Thanks,
    Sk

    SK
    In EOImpl file in setter method of Name you can write below logic
    import java.util.regex.*;
      public void setLastName(String value)
        Pattern p = Pattern.compile("[^a-zA-Z0-9]");
        Matcher m  = p.matcher(value);
            if (m.find()){
                System.out.println("last Name"+value);
                throw new OAException("Special Characters Not allowed in Name", OAException.ERROR);
           setAttributeInternal(LASTNAME, value);
      } Hope it helps!!!!
    Thanks
    AJ

  • Non-qualifier Auto Id

    Hello
    we have a qulaified lookup table with all fields set as Qualified except one which is an AutoId field.
    How do we handle the mapping of the qulaified lookup field in the the main table for the auto id seeing as we will not have a source field?
    Do we need to map all the Qualified fields or just the qualified fields that are display field?
    We keep getting the following error on import:
    Import failed. Cannot import qualifiers because the qualified lookup field is not mapped.
    Import action: Create
    Source record no: 1
    Kind Regards
    C

    Hello
    The senario is as follows:
    Main table record Customer has a field of type qualifed lookup called Search key id. The qualified table is used to maintain a list of search keys per customer.
    Lookup table is as follows:
    Id        AutoID   Non-Qualifier
    Key     Text      Qualifier
    Status Text      Qualifer.
    We recieve on import:
    Customer Number  and map to Customer Number (main table)
    Key Value and map to Key (qualified lookup table)
    Status Value and map to Status (qualified lookup table)
    We add a field "search Key" on import and map to search key (main table)
    The question is how do we handle the AutoId field? E.g. If we import 3 search keys
    for a customer autoid runs from 1 to 3 the qulaified lookup table
    We keep getting an error when we try this. (see org. message)
    Kind Regards
    Con

  • After 6 tries to load Photoshop CS6 on my new laptop, I keep getting the following message after I enter my valid serial number: "Serial number you provided is valid but a qualifying product could not be found on this computer."  What I'm, trying to do is

    After 6 tries to load Photoshop CS6 on my new laptop, I keep getting the following message after I enter my valid serial number: "Serial number you provided is valid but a qualifying product could not be found on this computer."  What I'm, trying to do is download the qualifying product which I purchased just a year ago?  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

    I contacted Adobe support Chat and they confirmed the serial number and gave me a response code number to enter. Once that was entered the product downloaded immediately. The whole process took 10 minutes.  Thank you for your response. I'm all good now.

  • Sorting the Non qualifier values.. Is it Possible!!

    Hi Experts,
    I have a qualified table.
    week day -> Non qualifier
    Time In -> Qualifier
    Time out -> Qualifier
    The Week day Field is fileed with all 7 days of the week.
    Monday, Tuesday,wednesday,Th..... sunday
    Wehave 2 issues here..
    1) In DM qualified lookup selection for a record, i can see it is autiomaticallyy sorted Based on Alphabetical order..
    that is Friday, Monday, Saturday, Sunday, thursday, Tuesday, Wednesday.
    we require this to be in Monday to Sunday order..
    2) Also i selected Monday first and gave timein time out values, and for the same record when i ALSO select Friday and provided Time in and Time out values and once i Hit save, then i can see that Friday is seen first and Monday is seen Next to it.
    Which means it is also saving the Entries for Qualified table in a Non qualifier Alphabetical sorting order.
    Can we get rid of this??
    User should see the Qualifid Lookup selection box in Monday to sunday order
    Once user selects the any of the values in non qualifiers they should be seen in Monday to Sunday order once they save.
    Note: Sort Type option at Non qualifier Field level did not help.
    did anyone face similar issue??
    KR
    John

    Hi,
    I used a Integer field called Code.
    which has 1-7 numbers.
    Name                 :     Code
    Monday                     1
    Tuesday                   2
    Wednesday              3
    thursday                   4
    Friday                       5
    Saturday                   6
    Sunday                     7
    These 2 fields are Non qualifiers, But in Portal we have hidden the Code field.
    This way the sorting worked.
    Closing thread.
    KR
    John

  • Fetching Non Qualifier value frm main table

    Hi All,
           I have a requirement where I need to get 3  Non-Qualifier value present in the Main table .
           These 3 Non-Qualifier values are present in 1 Qualified Table.
            Kindly send me some sample code for this scenario
    awaiting for your reply
    Regards

    Hi Sudheendra,
                  Get the record result set by serching one particular column(other than field of type qualified) of the main table.
    then follow the steps.
    QualifiedLookupValue LVAL =(QualifiedLookupValue) temprs.getRecords()[0].getFieldValue(repoSchemacmd.getRepositorySchema().getTableSchema("mainTableName").getField("MaintableFieldName").getId());
    QualifiedLinkValue[] qlinks = LVAL.getQualifiedLinks();
    for (int k = 0; k < qlinks.length; k++) {
       //check whether qualifiercolumn is Display field or not.
       if(displayField){
       RecordId RID[] = new RecordId[1];
       RID[0] = qlinks[k].getLookupId();
            ResultDefinition rd =new ResultDefinition(repoSchema.getTable("qualifertableName").getId());
            rd.setSelectFields(repoSchemacmd.getRepositorySchema().getTableSchema("qualifertableName").getDisplayFieldIds());
            RetrieveRecordsByIdCommand retrievedRecords =new RetrieveRecordsByIdCommand(conAccessor);
           retrievedRecords.setSession(userSessionID);
           retrievedRecords.setIds(RID);
           retrievedRecords.setResultDefinition(rd);
              try {
                   retrievedRecords.execute();
                  } catch (CommandException e) {
              Record[] rec = retrievedRecords.getRecords().getRecords();
                     for (int m = 0; m < rec.length; m++) {
                         //if the field value is String.
                        String Value = qlinks[k].getQualifierValue(repoSchemacmd.getRepositorySchema().getFieldId(tableName,column)).toString();
      else{
           //if columt type in qualifier table is StringValue.
           String value1 =qlinks[k].getQualifierValue(repoSchemacmd.getRepositorySchema().getFieldId("qualifertableName","qualifiercolumn")).toString();
    Regards,
    Sandeep.

  • Error message " The serial number you entered is valid, but a qualifying product annoy be found on this computer" appears. Unable to reinstall CS5.5 on my macbook pro after Hard disk crashed & was replaced.

    Error msg " The serial no you entered is valid,but a qualifying product cannot be found on this computer" appears. Can't reinstall CS5.5 onto Macbook pro after Hard disc crashed & was changed.

    It is not clear if you understand what that message is indicating.  It is telling you that you need to identify the older version of whatever CS5.5 upgrade you are installing to prove that you qualify for the upgrade.  This could be CS5, CS4, etc.
    Error "This serial number is not for a qualifying product" | CS6, CS5.5, CS5
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/error-serial-number-qualifying-product.html

  • Serial number you provided is valid, but a qualifying could not be found on this computer

    I want to install Encore from the Adobe CS6 Production Premium that I own but when I enter my password, it says "Serial number you provided is valid, but a qualifying could not be found on this computer". Another user had this problem but it was resolved privatly. How can I use my software?

    You are trying to install Production Premium CS6 upgrade version which is asking for previous version of this production.
    Fortunately you have the production premium CS5 full version also purchased & registered.
    You need to install that serial number ir resrespective of the fact whether it is installed on this system or not.
    You can get the serial number in your account of www.adobe.com.
    Regards
    Rajshree

  • I am trying to activate our adobe in-design and we are getting a message "serial number you provided is valid but a qualifying product could not be found on this computer"

    I am trying to activate our adobe in-design and we are getting a message "serial number you provided is valid but a qualifying product could not be found on this computer"

    Hi there!
    Are you certain that the serial number is for InDesign? And the correct version?
    Please feel free to PM me if you wish to verify the serial number.
    Thanks,
    Amy

Maybe you are looking for