Valuation strategy 2 rejected by activity valuation

Dear all,
I wish to close the PM order.Balance of the PM order is ZERO.
System displays the error
Valuation strategy 2 rejected by activity valuation
Message no. CK295
Diagnosis
Price strategy 2 is not allowed for the application. It is not possible to find average standard rates with an actual cost estimate.
Kindly suggest any possible solution!
Thanks and regards,
Satyajit

Satyajit,
I'm fairly sure it just cannot find a rate to use that is valid for the time period in which the posting date falls. Long text of your message says:
It is not possible to find average standard rates with an actual cost estimate
Look at KP26 but maybe another transaction. Also check with your CO people.
-Paul

Similar Messages

Re-set release strategy of rejected PO,after doing respective changes to po

Hi friends,
I have created release strategy for Purchase order with release indicator 6 (Changeable, new rel. if new strat. or value change/outputted), and with 3 release codes (3 approvers)..
Now in this case, After Rejection of a approver (creator of po will get an mail telling that its rejected). After rejection, the creator has did required changes and save the PO.
However the release strategy is not reset...So i want to know how to reset the release strategy in this case..
Where as in case after the approval, if creator do any changes in purchase order then release strategy is resets...
Here PO printout is possible only after the final approval...
Pls give some inputs in fixing this issue..
Thanks in advance....
Regards
Shashidhar...

Hi
What are the characteristics of your strategy?
Try to change one of them save and then rechange it to the original
eg.
If the strategy depends for example on the Purchasing Group (PG)
i mean according to different PG's different strategies working
then with ME22N change the PG save and rechange it again to the original.
or
for example If the strategy depends on Materail Groups (MG)
then do the change with MG
With ME22N change the MG save and rechange it again to the original.
I guess this will trigger the strategy again.
Hope it helps
Best Regards

Approve / reject review activity from mail notification

Hi SM Expert,
It's possible to approve or reject review activities from mail notification on Lotus Notes ?
Thanks

If lotus notes can send e-mails - YES.
Maybe this helps:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager/archive/2011/02/08/tricky-way-to-handle-review-activity-approvals-with-the-exchange-connector.aspx
Patrick Wahlmüller

PO release strategy, ref: plant and activity

Hi,
for PO release M_EINK_FRG is the object.
but along with this we need to give M_BEST_BSA & M_BEST_WRK, the activity is 02(change).
my concern is, if we give him the same objects authorization, he will be in a position to change the PO also, along with releasing the PO.
do we have any control for the same?

Hi,
In that case create seperate Z roles according to
Combination of Rel Code,Pur Grp,and plant combination
You can have that role with combination of all these objects with limited
authority specific to plant and or doc type
And assign these seperate roles to each user id
Try this and confirm
BR
Diwakar

Strategy for rejecting rows

Hi,
I have a problem that would like to bring up for discussion. I have a solution in mind, but would like to listen to other suggestions.
Product   Type   Test1   Test2   Test3   Test4   Test5
YTP1       A        1.0       2.0      3.3
YTP1       A        8.0       9.0      7.0
YTP1       B        5.0       6.0      7.0
BBP1      C         2.1      4.7       6.7
BBP2      A        4.5       4.7      6.8The problem statement is:
Suppose the table A above shows the testing results of a particular Product,Type group. Test1, Test2, Test3, Test4...Test10 are the test attributes. A product,type group is said to pass the test if Test1, Test2, Test3, ...Test10 all satisfied a certain criteria.
The criteria for Test1, Test2,...,Test10 are found in 10 seperate table for a Product,Type group. So, the tables look like this:
For Test1-Test10 look like this:
Product   Type   Pass_criteria
YTP1       A       2
YTP1       B       3
BBP1      C       4
BBP2      A       5So, let's assume that pass when the test attribute is less than the pass_criteria. (this criteria may change to less than, greater than etc)
What are the ways to scan the table A(1 million rows) and get those rows that pass?

Would doing this in SQL faster than say, in pl/sql using row by row checking?PL/SQL is usually slower than SQL. If the vast majority of rows are likely to fall at the first hurdle then possibly the time you would save by avoiding subsequent lookups might be quicker.
Which suggests an alternative approach:
SELECT product, type
FROM
    ( SELECT product, type FROM tablea a, test1 t1
     WHERE a.product = t1.product and
           a.type = t1.type and
           a.test1 < t1.pass_criteria
      INTERSECT
      SELECT product, type FROM tablea a, test2 t2
           WHERE a.product = t2.product and
                 a.type = t2.type and
           a.test2 < t2.pass_criteria
     INTERSECT
      SELECT product, type FROM tablea a, test3 t3
           WHERE a.product = t3.product and
                 a.type = t3.type and
           a.test3 < t3.pass_criteria
     INTERSECT
     INTERSECT
           SELECT product, type FROM tablea a, test10 t10
                WHERE a.product = t10.product and
                      a.type = t10.type and
                a.test10 < t10.pass_criteria
)With cases like these the easiest way of saying whiich is the faster approach comes down to trace and benchmarking. I wouldn't like to say the above is faster than John's suggestion; I hesitate to bet agaibnst JWS.
Cheers, APC

Thread pool rejecting threads when I don't think it should, ideas?

Hi,
I have a server application in which I only want a specific number of simultaneous requests. If the server gets more then this number it is suppose to close the connection (sends an HTTP 503 error to the client). To do this I used a fix thread pool. When I start the server and submit the max number of requests I get the expected behavior. However if I resubmit the request (within a small period of time, e.g. 1-15 seconds after the first one) I get very odd behavior in that some of the requests are rejected. For example if I set the max to 100 the first set of requests will work fine (100 requests, 100 responses). I then submit again and a small number will be rejected (I've seen it range from 1 to 15 rejected)....
I made a small app which kind of duplicates this behavior (see below). Basically when I see is that the first time submitting requests works fine but the second time I get a rejected one. As best as I can tell none should be rejected....
Here is the code, I welcome your thoughts or if you see something I am doing wrong here...
<pre>
import java.util.concurrent.*;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
public class ThreadPoolTest {
     static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger();
     public static class threaded implements Runnable {
          @Override
          public void run() {
               System.out.println("In thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getId());
               try {
                    Thread.sleep(500);
               } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                    System.out.println("Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getId()
                              + " interuptted");
               System.out.println("Exiting run: " + Thread.currentThread().getId());
     private static int maxThreads = 3;
     private ThreadPoolExecutor pool;
     public ThreadPoolTest() {
          super();
          pool = new java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor(
                    1, maxThreads - 1, 60L, TimeUnit.SECONDS,
                    new ArrayBlockingQueue<Runnable>(1));
     public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
          ThreadPoolTest object = new ThreadPoolTest();
          object.doThreads();
          Thread.sleep(3000);
          object.doThreads();
          object.pool.shutdown();
          try {
               object.pool.awaitTermination(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
          } catch (InterruptedException e) {
               // TODO Auto-generated catch block
               e.printStackTrace();
     private void doThreads() {
          int submitted = 0, rejected = 0;
          int counter = count.getAndIncrement();
          for (int x = 0; x < maxThreads ; x++) {
               try {
                    System.out.println("Run #: " + counter + " submitting " + x);
                    pool.execute(new threaded());
                    submitted++;
               catch (RejectedExecutionException re) {
                    System.err.println("\tRun #: " + counter + ", submission " + x
                              + " was rejected");
                    System.err.println("\tQueue active: " + pool.getActiveCount());
                    System.err.println("\tQueue size: " + pool.getPoolSize());
                    rejected++;
          System.out.println("\n\n\tRun #: " + counter);
          System.out.println("\tSubmitted: " + (submitted + rejected));
          System.out.println("\tAccepted: " + submitted);
          System.out.println("\tRejected: " + rejected + "\n\n");
</pre>

First thank you for taking the time to reply, I do appreciate it.
jtahlborn - The code provided here is a contrived example trying to emulate the bigger app as best as I could. The actual program doesn't have any sleeps, the sleep in the secondary thread is to simulate the program doing some work & replying to a request. The sleep in the primary thread is to simulate a small delay between 'requests' to the pool. I can make this 1 second and up to (at least) 5 seconds with the same results. Additionally I can take out the sleep in the secondary thread and still see the a rejection.
EJP - Yes I am aware of the TCP/IP queue, however; I don't see that as relevant to my question. The idea is not to prevent the connection but to respond to the client saying we can't process the request (send an "HTTP 503" error). So basically if we have, say, 100 threads running then the 101st, connection will get a 503 error and the connection will be closed.
Also my test platform - Windows 7 64bit running Java 1.6.0_24-b07 (32bit) on an Intel core i7.
It occurred to me that I did not show the output of the test program. As the output shows below, the first set of requests are all processed properly. The second set of requests is not. The pool should have 2 threads and 1 slot in the queue, so by the time the second "request" is made at least 2 of the requests from the first call should be done processing, so I could possibly understand run 1, submit #2 failing but not submit 1.
<pre>
Run #: 0 submitting 0
Run #: 0 submitting 1
Run #: 0 submitting 2
In thread: 8
In thread: 9
Exiting run: 8
Exiting run: 9
     Run #: 0
     Submitted: 3
     Accepted: 3
     Rejected: 0
In thread: 8
Exiting run: 8
Run #: 1 submitting 0
In thread: 9
Run #: 1 submitting 1
     Run #: 1, submission 1 was rejected
     Queue active: 1
     Queue size: 2
Run #: 1 submitting 2
     Run #: 1
     Submitted: 3
     Accepted: 2
     Rejected: 1
In thread: 8
Exiting run: 9
Exiting run: 8
</pre>

Activating Business Content

Expeerts,
I am about to start development in BI 7.0.
1. What should I activate first in Business Content? Should I activate all info objects first ? Or the identified cubes(data targets) and while doing so then collect the relevant info objects as well?
2. For master data objects and for transaction data objects which have SAP ECC datasources, what should be the strategy of collection and activation? Do I activate them in all 3.x format and then migrate them one by one? Or should I migrate them during BI activation itself? If I do the latter, do I end up losing the code in the transfer rules and update rules?
Your inputs are highly appreciiated.
Thanks

Hi Sheweta,
For your first question, I recommend collecting Infocubes along with the objects in the data flow, while installing the business content.
For second one,
Mostly all the business content data flow available in 3.x version only. So do it in 3.x version. There is no need to migrate the data flow to 7.0. In case that is needed, do it on case to case basis.
Hope I have answered your queries.

Workflow WS00000038 Purch.Req - Event REJECTED not triggered

Hi Friends!
(SAP ECC 6.0)
(Tcode SWE3 - BUS2009-REJECTED is active)
When using WS00000038 Purchase requisition we have problem when an item is REJECTED.
the Event that is triggered is BUS2009-SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED. This leads to that the Workflow end up with status COMPLETED and NO further handling of the actual Rejection that were made.
IF BUS2009-REJECTED were triggered instead, then WS00000038 would have followed another path in the workflow which is to handle the REJECTION via another TASK.
Why is BUS2009-REJECTED not triggered when button "REJECT" Requisition is pressed (ME54N).
Best regards
Henrik

In this aproval step within WS00000038 it is actually ME54N that is called.
The result in the task of the workflow is an EXTERNAL EVENT that is triggered.
In my case it is BUS2009-SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED that is triggered instead of BUS2009-REJECTED.
this is what causes my Workflow WS00000038 to choose the wrong path.
Does anyone have a solution of how to get BUS2009-REJECTED triggered via ME54N when I actually press button to REJECT and then SAVE.
Best reg
Henrik

User exit ML81N.....Name of user exit to trigger 'Release Strategy'..urgent

Hi Guys,
ML81N work in a manner such that if the net amount for any PO/Service entry is less than $2500 then its 'Release Strategy' tab is not active.
I have a requirement where i have to make that tab active and select the Lowest Release Strategy when the amount is less than $2500.
Can anyone please tell me the name of the user exit that controls the 'Release strategy'.
Points will be awarded...
Thanks
Rahul

Hi
Your settlement rule says "Settle to Cost Center" only.... I dont think any user exit can help in this case, if you want to settle occasioanlly to 2 cost objects
Try with these options
Option A
1. Remove the 100% validation tick in the settlement profile...
2. Maintain 2 settlement rules... i.e. One with Cost center and another with PSG... If any warning comes, ignore it
3. Execute settlement now
Option B
1. Maintain settlement rule with PSG as settlement receiver
2. In the same Settlement rule, Menu GO TO > DETAILS and maintain Cost Center also....
3. Now execute settlement...
Option C
1. Maintain settlement rule with PSG as settlement receiver
2. In the same Settlement rule, populate Cost Center also as a Valid Characteristic
3. Now execute settlement...
BR,Ajay M

User exit for Release Strategy in PM Work Order

Dear all,
Please help me with the following issue:
My client want to change the approval route of the release strategy of the Work Order. The release is based on the PM Activity Type. Now, I am brand new on the project, I have no documentation and I have no access to CMOD so I don't know where to find the cusomised release strategy for change it.
Please, can you advise on this?
Thank you very much.
Sorin

Dear,
to have release strategy based on "PM ACTIVITY TYPE", i suggest you two ways
Option-1:
1) Have permit system with classification as per the approval hierarchy.Create permits as per approval levels.
2) Once maintenance order is created, system will assign the permits to that maintenance order at the time of saving.
3) Now approvers will approve the permit with respect to Maintenance order PM activity type.
Note: If your client wants to have mailing functionality to their out look or other mails, put logic in save exit after assignment of permits to maintenance order, with the help of ABAPER and also the sequence of approving the permits.
Option-2:
1) Create user status profile as per approval hierarchy with number assignment.
2) Create "Authorization code" for the user status number.
3) Provide "Authorization code" to the SAP user ids as per approval hierarchy.
or
If you have only one app rover, provide authorization of creating order to one user and "Releasing" the order to other user.
Regards,
pardhu

ML81N Enhancement to trigger the 'Release Strategy'..very urgent !!

Hi Guys,
ML81N work in a manner such that if the net amount for any PO/Service entry is less than $2500 then its 'Release Strategy' tab is not active, because the minimum value should be 5000$ to trigger the 'Release Strategy'.
I have a requirement where i have to make that tab active and select the Lowest Release Strategy (the one for 5000$) even when the amount is less than $2500.
I have already tried with the ser exit EXIT_SAPLEBND_003, its a blank user exit and the structure available is CESSR.
Can any one tell me how to activate the 'Release Strategy' tab and the lowest Release stratedy should be selected ????
What i have investigated is that once i will set the Release Strategy to the lowest Release stratedy then that tab will automatically become active.
Please tell me how to select the lowest Release strategy using the CESSR structure ?
Points will be awarded...
Thanks
Rahul

Use this exit.
MM06E005

Where do I enter the Activation Key

Just picked up iWork with an online purchase. I cannot get the thing to ask for an Activation Key. The AK was eMailed to me. But all it asks for is a serial #. The thing always rejects my Activation Key, and tells me to enter a correct serial #.
anyone have an idea?

HI, The Pre-Installed Microsoft office installed in the unit is a Trial Version. If you have paid for the full version only then it will be pre-installed otherwise you have to purchase the full version.

Putaway strategy user exit

Hi all,
My storage type putaway strategy user exit is active for storage type. Can anybody tell me which user exit it is?

Hi
Can you please explain me whether we can create our own put away strategy based on the MRP(Maximum Retail Price) of a material.?
>it means same material having different MRP should not get merged into a single bin.
I cannot use it at batch level because my batch characters are on monthly basis.E.X. 200812,200901,200902.
>it always happens that different batches will quite often have same MRP.So if i use at batch level then i loose lot of space in my WH because it keeps booking the fresh GR into to next empty bin
>but i dont want to store them into separate bins as i loose space in my WH.
>Instead i want to store the materials having same MRP (belonging to either same batch or different batch) in a same bin and different MRP into different bins irrespective of batches.!!
>can i develop a put away strategy satisfying this requirement.??
thanks in advance for your response on this.
regards
Venkat
Edited by: VENKATARAJCK on Jun 26, 2009 10:29 AM

PRAA - List of Rejected personnel numbers

HI There,
After executing transction PRAA i'm getting a list of Rejected, Blocked, active employees. (see pics below). Is there any function module or table that I can access to get this list? I need the list of rejected employees to be used in a custom report.
http://imgur.com/lfTuo.jpg
http://imgur.com/D3NfV.jpg
Thanks!
Garth

As far as I can make out it is simply an output of the report displayed in spool, and is not actually stored anywhere. If you are running in the foreground and and have exited the report, you can no longer view the rejected personnel numbers.
I guess, if you are skilled in ABAP, you could call the program in test mode, with the same selection criteria in your custom report and intercept the program where it is writing the error and rejected lists and display the data into your own program output.

Sales order not reflecting in the stock reqmt list

we have a MTO scenario.after the sales order is created we are not able to see the sales order in the stock requirement list.kindly please help.

Hi
following are the reason
1) Check requirement type in sale order and strategy group in material master.
2)if reason for rejection is activated in sales order.
3) cancel the sale order
4) schedule line category should be CP in sales order
Edited by: surendra patil on Dec 29, 2008 7:30 AM
Edited by: surendra patil on Dec 29, 2008 7:33 AM

Valuation strategy 2 rejected by activity valuation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for