Value category wise budget and actuals display in S_ALR_87013558 report

Hello PS consultants,
There is a requirement in my project, where the business users want to see the report on hard budgeted cost element group , soft budgeted cost element group and total in different rows. In my project, there is one value category which has been made exempt from availabilty control(for repairable spares) and there are others which are under availability control. Also, the business wants to see all the columns as per S_ALR_87013558 report in the new report per the 2 categories of cost element group and total (but the budgeting here is done as per the WBS level, so how to satisfy this need also). The S_ALR_87013558 report gives the various value categories, but only assigned values against it(as budget is not against cost element). Also, in this report , it is not possibel to exclude one value category to see only the hard budgeted cost element group.
Please help.
Regards

Thanks Sam.
But my requirement is to exclude one particular value category, as it is not possible to include all the value categories in the report as there are large number of value categories. Is there any way to exclude one value category?
Thanks Abdul.
But if I suppress the value category , then it will be suppressed from the central level in PS and hence, it will not be included in any calculations in any of the standard report. Is there any way to suppress one value category from only one report, without affecting other reports?
Please help.
Regards

Similar Messages

Report for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item

Dear Experts,
Is there any standard tcode for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item level for the month.
there is one tcode s_alr_87013127 but user has to double click in order to get line item details.
I want to see line item wise breakup/bom wise target and cost cost as well as qty.
Thanks in advance.
regards
RK

Dear experts,
I am still looking for a revert.
regards
RK

COST ELEMENT WISE BUDGETING AND AVAILABILTY CONTROL

Dear Experts,
I am looking at Cost Element wise Budgeting and Availabilty control in internal Order, Availabilty control also should be Cost element wise.
Regards
Deendayal

Dear Surya Narayana,
Thanks for your prompt response, well i know that Budgeting is at summary level, want to just explore any other way out, is there any possibilty to link planning to budget as plannig is done on cost element wise.
you can also send me the details of budgeting and avaiilability control at dayal05 at gmail.com.
regards
Deendayal
Edited by: DEENDAYAL RAMACHANDRAN on Mar 3, 2009 2:15 PM

How can i subtract budget and actuals amount from gl_balances in discoverer

I have a problem with a discoverer report.
The table is GL_BALANCES (Financials), and i tried to subtract data of current year and last year, same month, or data from actuals and budgets amounts.
Data from actuals have the "A" code in the ACTUAL_FLAG field, and budgets amounts have a "B" code. I construct a cross-tab report with ACTUAL_FLAG field in the "X" axis and the accounts segments in the "Y" axis (From GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS). The problem is: How can i substract budget and actuals amounts? Is the same field but differents columns in report.
I cannot use analytics function because the version of database does not support that .
Somebody told me: "...You need to construct a custom folder to handle this..."
I don't want to finish the reports in Excel...
Thanks.

Hi Miguel
You can either create a database view or custom folder to do this using aliases for the two joins to the same table.
For example, you need something like this in the body of the SQL:
select
act.code_combination_id,
nvl(act.period_net_dr,0) actual_net,
nvl(bgt.period_net_dt,0) budget_net,
nvl(bgt.period_net_dt,0) - nvl(act.period_net_dr,0) diff,
act.period_name
from
gl_balances act,
gl_balances bgt
where
act.set_of_books_id = bgt.set_of_books_id and
act.code_combination_id = bgt.code_combination_id and
act.period_name = bgt.period_name
Of course you will still need to add your own joins to get the code combinations but I trust you get the gist.
Hope this helps
Regards
Michael

Re:budgeting and actuals in sem/bps

Hai,
Good morning.
Can anyone please tell me the difference between budgeting and actual information in sem/bps.
prasad

Hi,
The key data that you enter in the planning area is only for time dependent characteristics and attributes. For the hierarchies in the characteristic relationships the current data is used.
If you still want to use a time dependent hierarchy for modeling the characteristic relationships you could use a characteristic relationship type exit. In the exit you can read the hierarchy with the proper date.
Best regards,
Gerd Schoeffl
SAPNetWeaver RIG BI EMEA

Ship-to party wise Bill to party display any standard report?

Any one know
Ship-to party wise Bill to party display any standard report?
Thanks in Advance.
Shailendra

hi
can you please let us know your requirment??
if you want to get BILL TO PARTY assgined to SHIP TO PARTY then use table KNVP where you can pass Ship to party and select Partner Functn = WE (SH)
you will get all the RE(BP) for that customer
or you can develop Z report also

What is the difference between list display and grid display in alv report

Hai genious
i am a new of the abap, i dont know the alv report, i have a small doubt, can u please tell me what is the main difference between list display and grid display in alv report
thanks&regards
chinnu

Hi ,
1. For all practical purposes, they are the same.
2. Some differences:
a) from abap coding point of view,
alv list is done with Function modules,
alv gris can also be done with FM,
but can also be done using OO concepts.
b) Alv grid (using oo concept) requires
designing the screen layout .
Hence, in one screen, we can show more
then one alv grid
(we cannot show more than
one alv list on one screen)
c) ALV grid uses ActiveX controls
present on the Presentation Server.
Hence, it consumes More Memory
on the presentation server.
d) ALV LIST is Display Only.
Whereas
ALV Grid Can Be made EDITABLE for entry purpose.
e) In alv grid, these options are possible,
but not in alv list.
without horizontal lines
without vertical lines
without cell merging during sorts
display total lines above the entries
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Mamta
Edited by: Mamta Verma on Nov 27, 2008 6:41 AM

Employee wise Budget and Expense Tracking in FM-BCS

Hi Experts,
We have Activated FM-BCS to one of our client for budget tracking. Our client needs Employee wise expenses tracking for better and effective control. There is a requirement of capturing the budget Amount and Actual Amount on the basis of Expenses wise, Department Wise and Employee wise. For Example: Client wants to maintain the budget Employee wise Department wise and Expenses. Like
Employee No (PERNR): 1234
Department (Cost Center): Marketing
Expenses (GL Code): Telephone Expenses
Grouping of Expenses: Operating Expenses
Tracking Method: How much one Employee 1234 has budget for Telephone expenses and how much he has spend over a particular period.
So we have mapped as follows in FM-BCS to address the above issue:
Cost Center = Fund Center
GL Code = Commitment Items
Group of Expenses = Fund
Through FMBB, we have given the budget values as follows:
Fund+Fund Centers+Commitment Items. And actuals also we could capture.
But we are not able to map the Employee numbers in FM. How to accommodate / map the employee nos to FM Account Assignments. Can we map employee numbers to Funded Programs (700 employees in number and Overhead GL codes are around 50)
Regards,
Babjee

Hi,
To start with, choosing 'fund' for representing group of expenses, does not make much sense. Your expenses are already mapped by commitment items, being representative object for G/L. If you want to group those, you can use simple hierarchy of commitment items. 'Fund', when used properly, belongs more to budget domain, rather than to the expenses. For example, it could represent the source of the budget.
Secondly, having budget control on employee level sounds bit strange. Is your client going to budget 700 employees with different combinations of G/Ls? For what reason? And what happens if employee exceeds the budget? They won't pay him? All this does not make much sense. I understand, if you want to collect statistical data on the expenses made by employees. You can do it either via CO (internal order) or via self-developed reports based on PERNR.
Regards,
Eli

The fixed value date is empty and not displayed in the VA05 report

Hi SD Gurus,
With in the Sales Order in the line item level in the billing tab we have the fixed value date (VBKD - VALDT) were entered.
But when we try to execute the report VA05 were the fixed value date column shows empty (i.e without the date it shows the blank). Can you any one help me with regard.
We would like to fix this problem.
Thanks in advance for providing solution to this query.
Thanks and Regards,
SAP-SD group

Hi janarthanam,
Ok.
Goto t-code SQVI,SAP Quickviewer.
Give a name to your query and enter description ,etc.
Next enter the table from which you want to fetch data,ie,VBKD .
Select "Layout mode" for displaying data on the SAP screen or "Basis mode " if you want to extract the data to a word doc,excelsheet or a flat file.
Next you can select the fields you want to display into your report,their position and ascending/descending order,Here make sure u select
the field u need to display ie. the fixed value date ( VALDT) .
also select the fields u wish to have in the selection criteria.
Enter these required information and u would get a report on the SAP screen or in your desired format.
Hope it will suffice you.
For any queries ,your are welcomed.
Thanks,
Umesh.

FM to get actual line items, budget and actual amounts for a given IO num.

Hello Experts,
I am currently doing a report to show the actual and budget amounts for a given internal
order number. Now, my processing takes a long time so I need to know if there are any
available FM's for this.
I am checking transactions: S_ALR_87013019 and KO03.
Hope you can help me guys.Thank you and take care!

Hi Rob,
I am actually modifying my colleague's program and based on my checking, it is taking a very long time to fetch the relevant line items for a given IO(internal order) in tables BSIS and BSAS. Below is the code:
SELECT bukrs
         belnr
         budat
         aufnr
         dmbtr
         shkzg
INTO TABLE it_pdate1
FROM bsis
WHERE bukrs IN s_bukrs
AND budat IN r_budat_p
AND aufnr IN s_aufnr.
SELECT bukrs
         belnr
         budat
         aufnr
         dmbtr
         shkzg
APPENDING TABLE it_pdate1
FROM bsas
WHERE bukrs IN s_bukrs
    AND budat IN r_budat_p
    AND aufnr IN s_aufnr.
SORT it_pdate1 BY aufnr.
DELETE it_pdate1 WHERE aufnr EQ space.

PLM table for Internal Order budget, Actual Cost and Actual Hrs

Dear all
In cProjects version 4.0, we have integration with existing ECC 6.0. We create Internal Order manually and assign it to cProjects.
One cProject having one Internal Order.
Resource Planning part is managed in cProjects while Actual Time keeping(CATS with reference to Internal Order), budgeting of Internal Order, Material and Service Procurement which is done against Internal Order is managed in ECC. ECC and PLM are separate systems.
We have RFCs established to transfer actual hrs, budget and actual cost data from ECC to PLM.
Which is the ABAP table in PLM where we get linking of cProject with Internal Order and also actual hrs, budget and actual cost data in PLM system?
Thanks & Regards
Ashish

actual hrs, budget and actual cost data in PLM system?
Its not there, actual hours can be found in DPR_Task but it needs to be transferred by running a report.
The planned cost etc is also calculated at runtime and passed on to Costing object in ECC (Int order/PS)
Actual hours will be in CATSDB in ECC
needless to say actual cost will also be there in ECC and not in PLM, PLM only displays at runtime based on RFC.
If you want to try, Break the RFC and try to check the Evaluation..
Niranjan

Group wise Budget.

Hi,
Our client wish to implement Group wise Budget and MIS report available on Group wise Budget. Example, under Salary Budget head 10 items are there. Instead of putting 10 items value individually in Budget they will put total value of salary in Budget i.e, group wise of salary budget. Is this group wise budget possible through Internal Order and how?
Regards,
Samrat
Edited by: Samrat Roy on Feb 4, 2010 11:10 PM

Hi Pradeep,
In our business scenario as service industry there is only Cost Centre and Profit Center is available from SAP in Controlling. There is no internal order. At present only actual items are post both Cost Centre and Profit Centre. There is no planning both cost center and profit center. Our client wish to introduce Groupwise budget i.e, planning from cost side only. No revenue planning they are interested at present. This is the actual scenario. So there is a cost center group, under the Cost Center group individual cost center is availale. Under each of the Cost center multiple cost element may or may not be avallable according to actual entry post. Therefore under cost centrer 1 if 5 cost elements are available as A,B, C,D and E and total cost say Rs 100000(each cost element Rs 20000). My requirement is instead of putting 5 planning cost separately against each cost element A, B, C, D, and E in Plan cost column under same cost center 1 we want to put total planning cost say Rs 150000. Is it possible ? If possible kindly guide me.
Thanks & Regards,
Samrat

GL code FC wise budget

Presently we are using the Fund Center and Committment item mode to upload budget in fund managment and also we are able to get the report committment item wise and Fund center wise for analysis.
Want to know is there any option to upload budget Fund center and GL code combination as we are looking at analysis GL code wise
Is there any link from where we will be able to get the report - FC-Committment item-GL code wise budget vs actual data.
with regards
sathya

Hi,
GL Account is a FI module master data and committment items belong to Funds Management module. The only way to achieve you objective is to create every GL account as a committment item.
Rgds
Shivram.

Reg:Planned and Actual POC

Hi,
I have one requirement in progress analysis that system can find out the date wise planned and actual POC e.g:-
A1 activity having ear start date -01.03.2011 fin date- 15.03.2011
A1 Actual date-01.03.2011 to 03.03.2011 processing =30%
But when i run CNE1 and putting To Period =march 2011 and then cne5 system is showing result month wise planned and actual poc.
My requirement is to get planned POC as per date .If i will select for 3 days then planned POC also comes for 3 days and not for 15 days(01-mar to 15-mar)
We want to use progress analysis for activity date only
Progress version-100
Planned method- Time Proportionality.
Actual Method-Degree of processing from confirmation
So when we confirmed the activity 30% then in actual POC it is showing 30 and in plan also for 3days(01.03.2011 to 03.03.2011).
With Regards
Rohit Prakash

Hi,
Please read the following link
<Link deleted by moderator>
Hope this will help you
BR
Anjali
Edited by: Virendra Pal on Mar 3, 2011 12:34 PM
No spoon feeding please - Rohit should be able to search himself

Budget Scenarios - Actual Value

Good Morning,
When I setup values in the budget scenarios for expense or cost accounts I have incorrect values in the "Actual" column. The system doesn't update the real (actual) values correctly. I'm with SAP B1 2007 PL42.
The problem is that, when I choose "yes" when the system displays following message: "Account XXXXX has transactions in the systems. Do you want to restore the account's accumulators?", the system does not update correctly the current G/L accounts bookkeeping balance to the Actual column...
Do you know the reason or what can I do to solve this?
Thank you.
Susana Cunha

Hi,
To get the Actual Column corrected, the whole row has to be deleted of the G/L Account with the wrong Budget and then the Budget has to be determined again for this G/L Account. This way after pressing the yes or yes to all at pop-up window questions;
'Transactions found in the system for account XXX. Would you like to restore accumulators for this account?'
Also please check the following
Please check out the document on the Knowledge Base which covers your
question. Go to:
https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/smb/sbo/documentation ->
Select 2004 and -> How-To Guides 2004 A & 2004.2 B ->
Budget in Release 2004 A
The section titled 'Defining Budget after the Commencement of
Activity' (page 12 of 18) explains the message "Restore Account
Accumulator". I have copied the section below:
Defining Budget after the Commencement of Activity:
You can define a budget for accounts against which operations have been
performed.
These operations are: bookkeeping operations, as well as open purchase
orders and open purchase delivery notes.
After entering an amount, and clicking Update, the following message is
displayed: "Transactions found in the system for account XXX. Would you
like to restore accumulators for this account?
-Selecting "Yes" or "Yes to All" restores the accumulator for the
afore-mentioned account on the basis of the transactions and open
documents found in the system. The result is inserted in the Actual and
Future columns.
-Selecting "No" or "No to All" leaves the Actual and Future columns
empty.
If you select "No" or "No to all", transactions created after the budget
was defined will also not appear in the columns representing the
balances. However, the budget reports will always show the cumulative
balance since the beginning of the year.
Regards
Vikas
SAP Business One Forums Team
Edited by: Vikas Rastogi on May 5, 2009 6:10 PM

Value category wise budget and actuals display in S_ALR_87013558 report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for