Varient condition is not picked in the pricing procedure.

Dear Friends,
I am creating a sales order where, I am getting a message that VA00 condition is not determined. I analyze the pricing,and find out that the condition record is not determined by the system. Message number is 106. I already maintained the condition record for VA00.
Thanks,
Abhishek Kumar

Hi,
Only if you have created the variant and assigned the same in VK11 then the system will fetch that during pricing
otherwise for VA00 manual entries has a priority so you can add the condtion type manually and give the value to it manually.

Similar Messages

Condition Type not displaying on the pricing procedure

Hello We are copying a sales order contract with reference to a sales order but we want a condition on the contract pricing procedure to be determined. Now I know I could redetermine pricing by selecting these option but we can't do that as there could be a year difference so we need the old pricing. B Carry out new pricing C Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others e.g. Sales Order Pricing Procedure XXXX Conditions ZPR0 Conditions ZHD1 Create Contract with reference to sales order Contract Pricing Procedure yyyyy Conditions ZPR0 Conditions ZHD1 Conditions ZNEW In the analysis the condition ZNEW has the "Condition without condition record (not relevant)" As I mention in new pricing it appears

Hi Roy,
Trust you are doing good,
I have gone through the question which you have asked but its not clear what do you want to exactly do.
Pricing Procedure XXXX Conditions ZPR0 Conditions ZHD1 Create Contract with reference to sales order Contract Pricing Procedure yyyyy Conditions
Here you talking about two different pricing procedures..or you talking in terms of pricing values.
Please highlight.
Thank you,
Regards
SRT

Last conditon type is not active in the pricing procedure

Hi gurus,
In the standard system, when there are multiple Condition types exists in the pricing procedure for the same condition class ( Example : Price) then the value of the last condition type should be active and rest all should be inactive. Where as in my case i have 4 pricing condition types , instead of last condition type 3rd condition type is being active. Can any one suggest what would be the reason for this and how to make sure that last condition type is set as active?

I found that as the condition value is less than the condition base value , even though conditon type was last in the list it was not set as active. This can be seen by selecting the condtion type in the pricing details and then click on the details icon ( Lens ) .

Condition PR00 not appeared in customized pricing procedure

Hi Gurus
I have customized Pricing Procedure RVAA01 to ZVAA01.
ZVAA01 is already consists of PR00 & PB00 condition types.
I have also maintained the condition record (VK11) for the sales orgDist. ch material+customer combination.
But Billing doesn't show the PR00 condition at all.
How to fix this issue.
Regards
RG

hi R G ,
Please whether the system is using the same pricing procedure for billing document that of the sales order- (i am assuming that in sales order it is populating the conditon typwe pr00)by going to the condtions tab in vf01
if yes it should flow check in ovkk what is the pricing procedue that is allocated to the combination of sales areadoppcupp(cust pric proc.),
here dopp(doc pric proc) of sales order and bill should be same like A
upadate me with the above findings so that i can propse the other solution
revert if helpful
Mohit Singh

Rebate fixed amount condition in the pricing procedure

Hi SD Gurus,
i'm using rebate fixed amount conditions (Lum sum).
The situation from a business point o f view is the following: i pay the customer 1000$ once he made something.
This kind of condition is not relevant for accruals since they have to be built manually (manual accrual). As a consequence i'm note sure if this condition shoul be put in the pricing procedure used for invoices. In the other and for sure this condition should be inserted in the pricing procedure for manual accrual/credit note.
What is your point of view!!
Thanks
C

if you are going to use Rebate, then there is no need to add condition type in standard pricing procedure, if you have designed your pricing procedure, include condition types for rebates as in standard pricing procedure.
This condition type is linked to Rebate type.
I think you first try the scenario in IDES and then do the same settings as per yoru requirement.
If you want step-by-step procedure for rebates will help you
Please refere the thread
rebate documentation
Regards
Jitesh

Downloading the pricing procedure

Hi Gurus,
I am new to the Middleware.
I have defined the new pricing procedure in ECC 6 and I require downloading the same pricing procedure to CRM 5. What are the initial objects I have to us for initial download?
I have used the following things in the pricing procedure
     56 Sales org. of order/plant Condition Table     Standard one
     PI02 Sales org/plant            Access Sequence      Standard one
     I have defined 6 condition types.
     I have created the condition records for the condition types that where in the pricing procedure.
Can any body help me out?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
You told me that for the particular download use T.C - R3AR2 when I go there I found lot of objects but I am not sure which object i have to use? How to find the right object
If i want to download the Z00001 pricing procedure, 56 condition table , z001 to z10 condition table and condition records for the condition types.
I have also used the following things in the pricing procedure they are
In the subtotal column of the pricing procedure I have used
     1          Carry over value to KOMP-KZWI1
     A     Carry over price to KOMP-CMPRE (credit price)
     B     Carry over value to KOMP-WAVWR (cost)
In the requirement column of the pricing procedure I have use
     2     Item with pricing
     4     Cost
In the Condition formula for alternative calculation type column of the pricing procedure I have used
     2       Net Value
     11     Profit margin
Thanks in advance

Price was not picking from the Condition type for Item Category 'P' in PO

Hi Experts,
I Created one condition type based on Material and WBS which price was fixed based on this
I used the Purchase Order having Item Category P or Q Price should pick from the condition type where I mapped the WBS Element and Material.
The Net price was not picking from the Condition type Record. Why? What should be the Problem?
Whether my logic is correct or not?

The Scenario: I want to fix the Material price base on each WBS Element for a Project. For each WBS Element the Price will be various for same material.
Please help on this.
Thanks
Muthukumar

Hi,
In standard configuration you cannot set item delivery date as a pricing data.
Maybe you shoud look at SAP enchancement - in dedicated structures you can pass additional item data (structure KOKMP).
IMG link:
Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Define Price Determination Process -> System Enhancements
hope it helps.
regards,
wojciech

Gross price for BASB Condition is not picking in Purchase Order invoice tab

Hi Gurus
In taxinj -- conditional base column i added 362 and
in pricing procedure for gross price in subtotal column i added 6
but even though when i click invoice tab while creating Purchase Order i am not getting gross price for BASB condition same as gross price in pricing procedure it is picking some different value such as either net value or manual excise from pricing procedure JEXC condition value.
what went wrong.
Rgds
Shrikant Kamat.

Hi Saplearner's
Is there any body who will focus on this issue
I have maintained all this accordingly, but the problem lies over here
Pb00-- 100
ra01--- 2 discount
net-- 98
jexc(16%)--15.68 ( MANUAL EXCISE)
net amount including tax-- 113.68
freight(2%)-- 1.96
Actual-- 115.68.
BASB-- 115.68 ( It should be 100)
In short i have given summary above, now let me explain
when i am giving 100 as gross price,discount-2 and if i dont give JEXC, then BASB is coming 100 that is correct.
when i am giving 100 as gross price, discount 2 and if i give JEXC , then BASB is picking as 115.68.
Problem is here when we give JEXC manual excise.
Rgds
Kamat.
Edited by: shrikant kamat on Feb 16, 2009 2:09 AM
Edited by: shrikant kamat on Feb 16, 2009 2:09 AM
Edited by: shrikant kamat on Feb 16, 2009 2:10 AM
Edited by: shrikant kamat on Feb 16, 2009 11:57 PM

PO not picking up the Price from Info Record ???

Hi,
Pricing Procedure and the Schema Grp is defined in Schema Determination in SPRO.
Schema Grp has been assigned in the Vendor Master.
Price has been maintained in the PB00 condition type in the Condition Supplements screen, but shows 'Zero' in the 'Purchasing Org. Data 1' screen of Info Record.
However, while creating PO the system does not pick up the Price from the Info Record and both the Condition Types PB00 and PBXX appears and display the Amount as 0.00 ? Also the system does not take the value entered in the 'Net Price' field and the Price can only be entered manually in the Conditon Type in the Conditions Tab ?
Can anyone help in resolving this issue ?
Lucky.

Hi Lucky
1.Routine 6
This is an example of a pricing requirement. This requirement is met if the condition exclusion indicator is not equal to 'X'. This requirement can be assigned to a condition type in the pricing procedure to ensure that it is not accessed when a condition record with exclusion indicator 'X' has already been found. Condition exclusion is a general tool that can be used to exclude conditions from pricing based on previous conditions that have been found in the pricing procedure. This requirement is intended for use in MM pricing versus SD pricing. For SD pricing, a variation of requirement '2' should be used which would also check to see if the item category is relevant for pricing
2. You have define all your supplementory condition in supplementory pricing procedure and you have to assign this supplementory procedure to your Condition type PB00.Then all these conditions will be displayed at item level for selection in drop down.
Since the supplementory conditions are dependent on PB00, you have assign to the PB00.
If you maintain the values for these conditions in info record, these values will be copied from info to PO.
Regards
Ramakrishna

Suggestion for not picking up the same record

Hi All,
I have a plsql procedure that picks up the records from the same table from multiple threads. Different threads should not pick up the same record.
Current Logic:
I am locking the row that has been picked up the current thread and the next thread should pick up the next row but unfortunately i have a problem here, The inner query will pick up the same record until the status of that particular row is changed since I am picking them up in a FIFO order.
I am not able to add the lock row in the inner query since oracle does not support it. Is there any other way to do it simpler?
XXRM_ARM_HEADER
header_id
service_id
XXRM_ARM_LINES
line_id
header_id
status
Query
SELECT dl.header_id, dl.line_id
FROM xxrm_arm_header dh, xxrm_arm_lines dl
WHERE dh.header_id = dl.header_id
AND dh.service_id = 4
AND dl.status = 'REQUEST_RECEIVED'
AND dl.line_id = (SELECT LINE_ID
FROM ( SELECT dl.line_id
FROM xxrm_arm_lines dl,
xxrm_arm_header dh
WHERE dh.header_id = dl.header_id
AND dl.status = 'REQUEST_RECEIVED'
AND dh.service_id = 4
ORDER BY dl.line_id ASC)
WHERE ROWNUM = 1)
FOR UPDATE OF dl.status NOWAIT SKIP LOCKED

Robert Angel wrote:
forgive me if I am naive, but why wouldn't each thread updating its selected rows with a nowait and if exception pick the next range mechanism work?It is not that simple. You can get race conditions between threads as they process the same rows in the same order attempting to "beat" one another by being the first to lock it. The more threads there are, the potentially worse this situation.
There's also the issue of performance. The thread concept (aka parallel processing) in this respect has a single primary aim. Increase performance and scalability. But does it?
How is I/O reduced when 50% or more of the reads done by the thread (to find a row to process) is wasted I/O as rows being read have already been locked by other processes/threads?
The fact remains that if you give the same set of rows to a bunch of threads (e.g. DBMS_JOB processes) for processing, they will contend for the same rows. There will be overheads. There will be wasted I/O.
So what I am suggesting is each thread; -
1. Look for rows unprocessed, I usually use atribute field in e-Business suite for this purpose
2. Attempt to update them with nowait, to INPROCESS
3. If 2 fails, try the next range - repeat until 2 is possible or end of rangeAnd step 3 is the one that will waste I/O and waste time - as the time it spend looking for a row to process could have been spend on actually processing a row.
4. You could also improve this by specialising each thread to have its own preferences, if there exists a mechanism that would mean fair distribution between the threads..Yes, and this is a key factor to removing contention between threads, reducing their I/O overheads and reducing their time being spend on finding unprocessed rows to lock and process.
Then there's Oracle technical issues. On 11gr2 for example, despite using skip locked or nowait (that cannot be used together in a single clause like in 10g), I'm seeing deadlocks when threads contend for the same rows. Same code works fine in 10g without deadlocks. So the approach one chooses need careful testing on that specific Oracle version to ensure it behaves as expected and meets the performance requirements.
Bottom line is that parallel processing is not as straight forward as simply slapping a nowait clause onto a select statement in order to skip locked rows.

Workflow not picking in the agent

Hi SRM Experts,
We are doing an SSp implementation on SRM50. Here we are stuck with the workflow for shopping cart approval. We have done all the settings including the event linkage activation and agent determination.
But here the workflow works fine if we manually assign the agent. otherwise it is not picking up the agent and it shows'Adhoc Agent not found'. What could be the reason for the same. Please suggest.
Thanks & Best Regards
Raj

please check wether the start conditions for the workflow are active
at the following location
transaction --> SPRO --> Supplier Relationship Management --->SRM Server ---> Cross Application Basic Settings ---> SAP Business Workflow --> Define conditions for starting workflows.
which workflow are you using?
1) one step
2) two step
3) N- STep
>
Further to the above please check wether the manager has been maintained for the requestor in ppoma_bbp.
In the case of classic workflows --> managers are determined by the system from org structure.
Edited by: khan voyalpad usman on Feb 21, 2008 8:39 PM

Condition type date should be same to the pricing procedure date

hi
i have an problem
the problem is that condition type date is not same to the pricing procedute date
details of the problem
1. created a sales order the pricing date is 01.04.2006
2. when i go conditions in the sales order, as i go for details of the condition type date the is 04.04.2006
this date should be same ie 01.04.2006
give the solutions and relevant fields or procedure for this i will be greatful to all of u
bye

Braja,
Check this
Goto the billing plan tab in the corresponding line item and check the rule that is determined. Now go to the configuration of this rule table by using the path
SPRO>SD> Billing> Billing Plan> Define rules for determining dates and choose your Applicable rule and click on the details.
There you will see the Calendar ID field where you will have to maintain the applicable factory calendar. I think this should work and your billing date on the item relevant for billing plan should be the same as the other item.
Hope this helps,
Ravin

The pricing procedure in Sales order is not getting copied into invoice

The pricing procedure in Sales order is not getting copied into invoice.
I have created a document type (pricing procedure),based on the document type ,pricing procedure determination is done.
So while creating sales order the pricing procedure is determined but when invoice is created the pricing doesnt refelect in the invoice.How to over come this problem

Hi
Please check the in OVKK, weather you have maintained correctly or not.Also check in the Billing document type details what is the Document pricing procedure that has been maintained.
Regards
Srinath

Conditions mutually exclusive in the Pricing Procedure

Hello,
I want to define two conditions in the pricing procedure, but I don't want them to be determined at the same time in the billing document. One of them has an access sequence and it isn't always determined, and the other one doesn't have access sequence and is always determined, but I want that the last to be active only when the first one isn't. Is there any way to do this without developing a condition to put it in the requirement field?
Thank you,
Silvia

Try to use the Condition Exclusion For Groups Of Conditions in the pricing customizing.
Create 2 groups, one assigned to the first condition and the other to the second, then assign the exclusion procedure to the you pricing schema.
The exclusion procedure should be D, that means:
Exclusive procedure: If a condition type from the first group exists
in the document, all conditions types that are found in the second
group are set to inactive.
Pls. reward points if helpful
Regards
Roberto

System is not picking up the WBS element from Asset in PO.

Hi,
While creating Purchase Order with account assignment category
as "A"(i.e.Asset), system is not picking up the WBS element from Asset
Master, even though it is defined in the asset master.
Please help.
Thanks,
Ninad

Hello Ninad,
Please, see the SAP Note 21583. I think it might be of help for your case.
Best regards,
Esther.

Varient condition is not picked in the pricing procedure.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for