Vendor Evaluation on Purchasing Group

Hi SAPER'S
Could anyone tell me the if we can run vendor evaluation on Purchasing Group or can we get the report on Purchasing Group after vendor evaluation run.
Full points guranteed.
Regards.

Hi
No it is not possible.
Purchasing group is not an organisational element.
If you want to evaluate based on the plant , that can be done using enhancments.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Similar Messages

Vendor Responsibility for Purchasing Groups

Hi experts!
We should assign vendor responsibility for purchasing groups, what means depending on which vendor / source-of-supply is selected in the shopping cart the correct purchasing group is assigned.
Do you have any idea how to handle this in SAP standard?
Can we use a BADI to help out?
Many thanks for your ideas.
Best regards,
Corinne

Hi
Lots of BADIs are there, which can help out ->
BBP_PGRP_ASSIGN_BADI EBP Purchasing Documents: Assign Purchasing Group(s)
BBP_PGRP_FIND Shopping Cart: Determine Responsible Purchasing Group(s)
<u>Related links to check out -></u>
Re: How to assign purchasing organization to a vendor using the GUI interface??
Multiple purchasing group responsibility?
Re: SRM 5.0 - Assign user to multiple purchasing groups?
Re: Purchasing Group and User Assignment
How can we change the purchasing group which it is maintained in R/3?
vendor not intended for a puchasing org
<u>Other related BADIs -></u>
BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI
BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI
Hope this will definitely help.
Regards
- Atul

Vendor evaluation in purchase order (vendor unknown)

Hi!
I created 2 new evaluation criteria for vendor evaluation.
When i go to tcode ME25 "create PO vendor unknown", I assign the source of suplly and click on "vendor evaluation" my 2 new criterias do not appear in the "Ranking list of vendors".
Any ideas?
Regards.

I think the new vendor is having a different pricing schema than the old vendor. Check the pricing schema for the old vendor (in purchasing view in field 'Schema Group. vendor) and compare it to the new vendor. I think they're different.
If it is then what i think happening is the user already input the price for the condition type in pricing schema A, then the vendor is changed and the new pricing schema is kiciking in thus making the old condition type missing.
Try to either:
A. Change to the old vendor back,
B. Change the pricing schema of the new vendor to be the same with old vendor

Vendor Evaluation using Material Group

Dear all
Kindly let me know whether Vendor evalation is possible using material Group.
Regards
M.Chandra mohan

Dear all
What I mean to say it, we do not have follwoing master in our company.
Material master, Vendor master & Pur.Info records,I did not know what configuration has been there in PRD server,But once we gave Authorization to our user regarding Vendor Report, they are getting the Vendor evaluated automatically,So I thought It is taking the material Group as a reference for Evaluation,That why i requesting your guy how we can do configuration in related to Vendor Evaluation.
Regards
M.Chandra mohan

Vendor Evaluation Purchasing Group wise

Dear Friends,
My clients Requirement is to evaluate vendors based on Product group wise.
I can use dedicated Buyers(purchasing group) for particular product group.
What is the possibility of evaluating vendors Purch. group wise in SAP.
Best Regards
Krishna

Hi ,
In Standard SAP , Vendor Evaluation is done at the purchase organisation level.All the data required for vendor evaluation is stored in the system acordingly.
In case you want to do vendor evaluation at purchase group level , you can acheive by custom developed program only.
In case , the same vendor is used by more than one purchase group ... There is no system check to control this . But the vendor master is maintained at the purchase organisation level that is why standard SAP is performing Vendor evaulation at the purchase organisation level..
Regards
Mani

Vendors per purchasing group

Hello
How can I get a list over vendors per purchasing group in SAP?
The solutions I've read about here in the past does not work.
regards
André

assignment of purchasing group to vendors is not best practice and never saw it anywhere
the field in LFM1 (vendor master purchasing data view) is only taken into account if you did not assign a purchasing group to the material master.
the process of procurement is starting with demand for a material, the requisition has already to go to a purchasing group before the purchasing group does the source determination.
It could only be different if you have fixed sources per material and purchasing groups in the vendor master instead of the material master, then the source determination could happen in the MRP run.
If you never maintained in purchasing group in a vendor master, then you can only analyze existing PO to find a link between purchasing group and vendor.
One way to analyze this in SAP would be transaction TAANA.
Just click the execute button in TAANA, enter EKKO table and click the multiple selection for the variant field. In next screen click the ad-hoc variant button.
In the next screen select the fields purchasing group and vendor number and purchasing group, then click continue and execute your selection.
You will get a list with any vendor/purchasing group combination you ever had in a PO

Equal weighting AND   Unequal weighting in Vendor Evaluation ?

Hi Experts,
Can u pls explain me this small issue with Vendor Evaluation weighting
SPRO - IMG - MM - PURCHASING - VENDOR EVALUATION - Maintain Purchasing Organization Data - SELECT PURCH .ORG -
DOUBLE CLICK ON Weighting - THERE IS I AM SEEING THIS LIST BELOW - Equal weighting AND   Unequal weighting
REPETING. my client wants vendor evaluation   Unequal . so i have to delet the Equal weighting 5 line or what to do ?
can u pls explain me.
01 Equal weighting 01 Price 1
01 Equal weighting 02 Quality 1
01 Equal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 1
01 Equal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
01 Equal weighting 05 servicio 1
02 Unequal weighting 01 Price 1
02 Unequal weighting 02 Quality 1
02 Unequal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 2
02 Unequal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
02 Unequal weighting 05 servicio 1
Thanksin Advance,
Anthyodaya.

Hi Priyanka,
thank you for the reply . but finalley my question is
my client wants Unequal weighting .
so i have to delete that Equal weighting lines or not .?
i mean line of below list .which is in BOLD letters. ?
01 Equal weighting 01 Price 1
01 Equal weighting 02 Quality 1
01 Equal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 1
01 Equal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
01 Equal weighting 05 servicio 1
02 Unequal weighting 01 Price 1
02 Unequal weighting 02 Quality 1
02 Unequal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 2
02 Unequal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
02 Unequal weighting 05 servicio 1
can u pls explain me.
Thanksin Advance,
Anthyodaya.

Delivery rating in vendor evaluation

Can I know on what logic system calculates the delivery rating, for schedule agreement which has more than one schedule lines.
Regards,
M.M

Dear Magesh,
This is for On time delivery:
===========================================================
At the time of a goods receipt against a purchase order, the system checks whether the delivery was on time or late:
GR date - delivery date = date variance
If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity is to be taken into account.
It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
If a value exists, it is used. If no value exists, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If there no such value in this case either, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If no value exists, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery date adhered to, the variance is zero and the system awards the highest points score for the relevant goods receipt.
If the delivery is not on time, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
In the process, the system searches for the standardizing value as follows:
It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
If a value exists, it is used. If not, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value in this case either, one of the following values is used:
in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value, one of the following values is used
in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
The new score is then included in the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor Date variance defined in Customizing.
When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendor's score for "On-Time Delivery Performance".
If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and included in the existing score for on-time delivery performance for the vendor
Adherence to Conf. Date :
===========================================================
1. When a goods receipt is posted for an order item, the system checks whether open inbound deliveries exist for the order item, i.e. inbound deliveries for which no goods receipts have yet been recorded.
If open inbound deliveries exist, the system checks whether the date previously notified by the vendor has been adhered to or whether the goods receipt date differs from the date thus confirmed:
GR date - date confirmed by vendor in shipping notification = date variance
2. If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity has been defined in Customizing.
a. If you have not set a minimum delivery quantity, goods receipts representing partial deliveries will also be included in the calculation of the score.
b. If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
c. If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery is on time, the variance is zero. This means that the system awards the maximum score for the goods receipt.
3. If the delivery date is not in accordance with the notified one, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
4. The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
5. The new score is then merged with the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor On-time delivery performance/Timeliness of service provision (defined in Customizing for Vendor Evaluation under Purchasing organization data for Vendor Evaluation).
6. When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendors score for adherence to the confirmation date.
If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and merged with the existing score for adherence to the confirmation date for the vendor.
Regards,
w1n

Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation

Hi,
Vendor evaluation is maintained. But it does not get updated automatically after GR. We have to update them one by one (ME61/ME63). Is there a way to automatically revaluate multiple vendors at the same time.
Regards,
Pratap

Hello,
If you want to evaluate vendors on a large scale, the system offers standard analysis to meet with your needs. They are transactions ME6B, ME6C, and ME6D. YOU can access these transactions via the front-end SAP menu Logistics>MM>Purchasing>Master Data>Vendor Evaluation>List Displays. For details about these standard analysis
report, you can read the online documentation at SAP Liabrary>Logistics>MM>Information System>MM Vendor Evaluation>Reports and Analyses in Vendor Evaluation.
What data will be taken into account in vendor evaluation is defined by the applicability period (period in calendar days) in IMG Customizing >MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation. Note: The applicability period is not taken into account with respect to all vendor evaluation criteria. It is therefore not designed to restrict the period to a certain year.
Example:
If you enter the value 150 here, the system will take into account data from the past 150 days for vendor evaluation purposes. Data that is more than 150 days old will not be included in the evaluation process.
Next, after a configuration change, you will have to rebuild table S013 to get data before the configuration into vendor evaluation with transaction OLI3. I have attached note 64636 which describes the process of rebuilding your statistics.
Regards,

Vendor Evaluation in MM

Hi All
Can u tell me the Detail process of Vendor Evaluation in MM
Regards
Manju

HI,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
You can also refer http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97e4f414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Thanks & Regards,
Kiran

Vendor evaluation - General Service and support

Hi
What are the subcriteria that can be under General Service and support?
How the scores are calculated for this?\
If manual where can we enter the scores for these?
Regards
Soumen

Hi,
Following are the answers for your questions.
What are the subcriteria that can be under General Service and support?
Ans: - Subcriteria can be defined by us as per our requirement but SAP has provided following 2 Subcriteria;
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
How the scores are calculated for this?
Ans: - For above 2 subcriteria, you can assign a scoring method as following;
C Determination from quality rating of service
D Determination from timeliness rating of service
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Criteria > Here maintain subcriteria for Service criteria and assign the scoring method
At the time of processing Service Entry Sheet, under "Vendor evaln" Tab, you will have option to enter scores for the following subcriteria
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
Once you enter scores here, it will get calculated in ME61, if automatic evaluation is configured for above 2 subcriteras
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation > Here for Service criteria and it's subcriteria do not activate manual maintenance indicator
If manual where can we enter the scores for these?
Ans: - And if you want to maintain values manually for Service criteria and subcriteria then activate the manual maintenance indicator in above config path and then maintain it duirng ME61 (Vendor Evaluation)

Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

Dear Gurus,
Pls explain me Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

Hi,
Vendor evaluation is the process of analyzing and assessing the performance of the external vendors. In this processes vendors are allowed to score in different criteria and the highest points scored by vendor is selected for procurement.
Follow the bellow steps:
1. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Weighting Keys
Select.Equal Weighting or Unequal Weighting
2. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Criteria
Price,
Quality,
Delivery,
Service
For each criteria you will have Sub criteria
Criteria Sub-Criteria
Price, 1.Market Price,2. Price List
Quality, 1.Goods receipt,2.Quality Audit
Delivery 1.On time deliver,2. Confirmation, 3.Shipment Intructions
Service 1. Innovative, 2. Flexibility
3. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Scope List.
4. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Maintain Purchasing Organization Data
5. ME61
With above, you need to explore urself and read SAP help files.
Note: Follow the below link and check saphelp file
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
Regards,

Vendor Evaluation Price Level For services

Hi expert, I've seen that the Main Criterion "Price" is just for materials, and I wanted to know whether there is a way of Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria for services.
I also wanted to know if there is any other standar criterion for evaluating services.
Thanks !!

Hi,
Subcriteria can be defined by us as per our requirement but SAP has provided following 2 Subcriteria;
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
For above 2 subcriteria, you can assign a scoring method as following;
C Determination from quality rating of service
D Determination from timeliness rating of service
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Criteria > Here maintain subcriteria for Service criteria and assign the scoring method
At the time of processing Service Entry Sheet, under "Vendor evaln" Tab, you will have option to enter scores for the following subcriteria
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
Once you enter scores here, it will get calculated in ME61, if automatic evaluation is configured for above 2 subcriteras
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation > Here for Service criteria and it's subcriteria do not activate manual maintenance indicator
And if you want to maintain values manually for Service criteria and subcriteria then activate the manual maintenance indicator in above config path and then maintain it during ME61 (Vendor Evaluation)

Vendor Evaluation Automatically

Dear all
        Kindly sent the related Document both configuration & end user details for Vendor evaluation.
Urgent Please.

Hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing:
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion     Key 01 Key 02
Price                   1      5
Quality                 1      5
Delivery                1      2
Gen. service/support    1      1
Ext. service provision 1      2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendors score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
regards,
sasi

Very imp vendor evalution

please provide me the relevant configeration settings step by step for vendor evalution.
regards
meena

1. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Weighting Keys
2. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Criteria
Price,
Quality,
Delivery,
Service
For each criteria you will have Sub criteria
Criteria Sub-Criteria
3. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Scope List.
4. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Maintain Purchasing Organization Data
5.Run ME61
Note: Follow the below links
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf

Vendor Evaluation on Purchasing Group

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for