Vendor Evaluation through ME63

Hi all,
Kindly give me the configuration steps for Vendor Evaluation.  The specific requirement is
only for two main criteria  1. Quantity - subcriteria  GR/IR inspection & Rejection/Complaint
2. Delivery - subcriteria Ontime Delivery & Quantity Reliability.
During evaluation,  the score of the vendor should be calculated as 50% of Quality Score + 50 % of Delivery score.
Warm Regards,
Sadashivan

Hi,
Check below links...
Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
Edited by: Julfikar Ali on Apr 13, 2009 1:30 PM

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history

    Dear all,
    I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
    For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
    Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
    Vendor XYZ
    Material ABC
    For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
    For 2010 Maket price 8.2  Effective price 8.5
    Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
    Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
    Vendor XYZ
    Material DEF
    For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
    For 2010 Maket price 20  Effective price 22
    Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
    When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
    5     Price behavior     5.0     10
    5     Price behavior     10.0     15
    5     Price behavior     20.0     20
    5     Price behavior     50.0     20
    5     Price behavior     99.0     10
    5     Price behavior     5.0-     50
    5     Price behavior     10.0-     100
    5     Price behavior     50.0-     20
    5     Price behavior     99.0-     10
    Pls help me resolve the issue
    Regards.
    Milind Dugade

    Hi Siva,
    [Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Reward if helpful.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Naveen Dasari
    Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

  • Vendor evaluation - individual calcualtion logs

    hi ,
    can anybody help me how to get individual calculation logs  for vendor evaluation in ME63, ME65
    when i clicked on  Goto >>> individual logs (all logs )  ... no data is coming.
    any settings needs to be done for this to get  this calculation logs .
    pls help
    Thanz in  advance
    Aparji

    ya .  i tried for sub criteria also .
    all logs not coming

  • Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

    Dear Friends,
    I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
    Regards,
    Saurav

    Dear Friend,
    Kindly go through the below documents,
    Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

  • Perform VENDOR EVALUATION for MORE THAN ONE VENDORS at a time

    Hello all,
    Please guide for any process where i can perform Vendor Evaluation for MORE THAN ONE vendors AT A TIME.
    At my location there are around thousand vendors, which are to be evaluated, and difficult to perform the evaluation process one-by-one.
    (ME61/ME62/ME63)
    Detailed replies with various possibilities would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Joy Ghosh

    The vendor evaluation for some thousand vendors at the same time has already been in SAP long before they developed LSMW. The purpose of LSMW is to load data from a legacy system, of course you can (mis-)use it for a lot other things.
    But you should not always use LSMW if you are to lazy to go thru the SAP standard menu to find a transaction like ME6G
    There you define a job that runs RM06LBAT report.
    You first have to define a selection variant for this report. this can be done in SE38 by entering the report name, select variant, clicking display, then entering a name for the variant and clicking Create.

  • Goods receipt sub critaria in vendor evaluation

    In vendor evaluation there is one sub-critaria goods receipt under main critaria quality, in this how system calcutae the tax.
    i went through the sap help doc, in this it is mentiaoned that
    "When you run an automatic re-evaluation for a vendor, the system selects all the incoming inspection lots for the vendor that lie within the validity period and calculates the average of the scores. The result is the vendor's score for the quality of goods received."
    i m not understand with this. plz specify in your words and where we maintain the validity period?

    Hi,
    In the sub-criteria Goods Receipt, system dows not calculate tax. In the main criteria of Quality, if your material is maintained for quality inspection type 01, then system creates inspection lots for GRN. The score of each inspection lot is calculated based on you settings (For example based on usage decision). The system then saves these scores of each inspection lot. These scores are then averaged out for all the inspection lots those lie within the validity periods.
    Hope this helps,
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • Tables for vendor evaluation data

    Hai,
        I want to know the tables in which vendor evaluation data is being stored, and I need to get vendor evaluation data through my RFC, can u suggest me the procedure how I need to do it.
                                 Thank you
                                  Regards
                                    Srinivas

    Dear,
    You ask a whole Vendor evaluation concept you need to read the help and do customizing depend on the requirement, then you evaluate the vendor using ME61 or ME6G.Almost all of your question need customizing setup first
    below is the guide book :
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf

  • Vendor Evaluation by Material and Material Group wise

    Dear Folks,
    Customer requirement is to see subcriterion level scores of Vendor
    Evaluation according to material, Material group wise. But the
    datasource provided by SAP is providing the data according to
    Purchasing Organisation level and Vendor level (0MM_PUR_VE_01).Is it
    Possible to break the scores according to material group and material
    as TC in r/3: ME6B provides ranking based on Main Criterion level
    scores. If possible, what is the logic?
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi Anil,
    Thanks for ur reply.
    But Customer requires vendor evaluation data through Automatic route.
    0MM_PUR_VE_02 caters to semi-automatic data which needs to be configured in r/3, and customer doesn't want to do that. Is there any other solution.

  • Vendor Evaluation formula

    Dear All,
                   Kindly give me the vendor evaluation formula.
    I have configured the vendor evaluation with the following weighting factors:
    Price : 30%
    Quality: 50%
    Delivery : 20%
    i want to know how it is calculating internally in SAP .i want the formula for thes
    Regards
    Kumar.

    Hi,
    please go through the following link. there is a document given by SAP.
    COIN error during MB1A transaction code
    this document explains all the formulae you are asking.
    agian there are many threads which discuss about the various problems faced in this functionality and there you may find the explainations related to it with the formulaes.
    regards,
    Adwait Bachuwar

  • Regarding vendor evaluation

    Hello Gurus,
    Can any one tell me about the vendor evaluation.
    What is the transaction code for vendor evaluation?
    Reg/ Shankar G

    Hi shankar,
    please go through this: step by step guide
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    Please check whether you concidered all these points in your configuration
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97dda414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97f3e414511d188fc0000e8322f96/content.htm
    Regards,
    Hareesha

  • What is differnace betweem vendor evaluation & vendor analysis

    Hi,
            What is differnace betweem vendor evaluation & vendor analysis? Please, any one can elaborate it?
    ( In domain they have different terminology)
    if there is differnce between these two term, How we do in SAP MM. I mean is there any Tcode for this?
    Regards,

    Pls go through the below link..
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/VendorEvaluationin+MM-PUR
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68747605
    BR

  • Does Cremas Idoc supoprt Vendor Evaluation

    Hello,
    My requirement is such that, whenever a Vendor Evaluation i done,
    The report ME6F, the same needs to be sent to a Non-SAP system through IDoc or Proxies.
    We have PI as the middleware.
    so is there any specfic Idoc for vendor Evaluation or does Cremas Idoc have provision for the same.
    Or are there any BAPI available that can be used in ABAP Proxies.
    Regards,
    Abhishek

    Hello,
    My question is, as you mentioned that CREMAS support Vendor Evaluation.
    I am asking which is the segment, which has the relevant fields or vendor evaluation.
    Regards,
    Abhishek

  • Vendor Evaluation Period Selection

    Dear Sir,
    We use ME63 for Vendor Evaluation , here we do not find any option to give  the period over which Vendor should be Evaluated . We have a requirement that Vendor Evaluation must be based upon the Purchases made during period 1-DEC-2007 to 31-DEC-2008 .
    Kindly guide us , as how can be achive it please .
    Rgds
    B Mittal

    Hi
    Standard SAP does not provide you such a facility, wherein you can run the vendor evaluation for a specific date range.
    There is a days selecion criteria in customizing settings for a purchasing organization wherein you specify the no. of days which needs to be considered for reporting from the current date, the documents that are posted within that date range from the current date are only taken into consideration for vendor evaluation.
    You can manually maintain the number of days in the customizing, which needs to be considered for scores calculation.
    Thanks
    E.Avudaiappan.

  • How to add criteria in vendor evaluation

    Hi friends,
    For vandor evaluation , I wants to add 'Criteria' how can i add it.
    Regards,
    Mahesh.

    Hi Mahesh,
    Vendor Evaluation comes with the standard main criterions Price,Quality,Delivery and Services and Sub criterias.
    It's possible to add the criteria through config.
    Regards,
    Bijoy Kumar S.P.

  • Price level in vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    I have created 1st PO with price 50 and checked the ME63, system showed score for price level as 40. Then I made another PO with price 55 and checked ME63, system displayed the same score 40,
    While there is change in price of 10 %, so I was expecting score of 10 .
    Can anyone explain about this.

    Hi,
    Following is the calculation procedure for
    1) Price Level -
    If you have maintained market price for the material, the system checks vendor's price level with the market price, otherwise it compares the vendor's price with average price of material by all vendors. Then the price variance is calculated in percentage. The score is awarded for this price variance as per settings in your system configuration. This process is repeated for all the materials supplied by the vendor. The overall score is the average of all these scores.
    2) Price Behaviour -
    System checks market price / average price of the material for last year as well as for current year. System calculates the percentage change for the market price. System repeats this procedure for price of material by vendor. Then system compares these two values & calculates percentage variance. The score is awarded for this variance as per system configuration. The overall score is the average of all these scores of the materials.
    3)Online Delivry statistics -
    System calculates the difference between scheduled delivery date in PO & actual delivery date & calculates the percentage variance. The score is awarded as per settings in system configuration. This process is repeated for each P.O. & overall score is average of all these values.
    Hope the answer is helpfull. For more details, you can avail online help at site http//:help.sap.com on subject Vendor Evaluation.
    Regards,
    Prashant Kolhatkar

Maybe you are looking for