Verizon FIOS what a horrible experience​!

God I feel so appalled and disappointed at Verizon​ FIOS beyond disbelieve.
I had been a Verizon customer for several years and sadly the customer service has gone down the drain in recent years. My biggest dilemma started after some of the channels I paid for stopped working for an unknown reason. After spending several hours with technical support and tearing my rooms apart, flipping my five (5) set- up boxes upside down in order read the serial #’s to Verizon support so that they can do something with my account, they finally told me they needed to dispatch a technician to fix the issue. While I was on the phone with support and checking the information I realized they had been charging me for 7 set-up boxes and I only have 5???
Anyway, a technician showed up in my house a couple of days later and ran some tests and said the problem was the outside wiring so he went outside to fix it. He got three of my boxes fixed but the one located at the attic (my son’s room) he could not fix. He said the issue was the small COAX to RJ45 converter box my son was using to connect his desktop computer and X-Box to the internet. Mind you this small converter box was given to me by Verizon about 5 years ago so I don’t have to run Ethernet cables to the attic for Internet access and it had been working just fine for all these years. After a long testing period with the set-up box in the attic the technician came to the conclusion the issue was actually the set-up box itself and therefore he replaced it. What really bothers me is he never put the little converter box back and instead took it with him, leaving my son without Internet?
The following day I realized only 4 of my 5 set-up boxes were working and after tracing cables outside my home I found out the technician changed the existing coax splitter with a 4 Way Coax Splitter instead therefore leaving the cable for my fifth set-up box hanging (disconnected)??.
So after calling Verizon again and after a very long phone call they finally agreed to dispatch a technician to correct the problem with the fifth set-up box. Needless to say a new technician came to my home and despite me requesting them to bring back my son’s little converter box, they never returned it, leaving me with a very unhappy, upset, and Internet-less teenager at home.
Few days later I accessed my Verizon FIOS account to check my bill and make the payment for the new month, but just to notice my bill doubled?? It was a bit over ~$549.03 and I had no idea why?? So I called Verizon AGAIN and after escalating this issue to the manager (Sue employee ID: {Edited for privacy}) she informed me my account was closed and a new account was opened?? (without notifying me?). After she reviewed my account she informed me, several times, my current balance was $0 (zero) because I was given a credit of $544 for the times Verizon was charging me for extra set-up boxes and because they have changed my account without notifying me. She said my online account was not in sync with their database and this is why I was only able to see the ~$549.03 balance, even though her database showed a zero balance. She kindly promised to call me back as soon as the new online account is in sync with their databases so she can inform me that everything has been taken care of. She also said it would only be a couple of days before she can call me…
Needless to say I never received a call back from her and it has been more than two weeks now.
To top it all up I received a bill from FIOS today (4/1/2013) where Verizon is charging me $979.50???
I called Verizon support immediately (around 9:17 PM EST) and after the customer service rep. (a lady with initials MC) could not figure out my bill, I requested to speak with the manager. So she placed me on hold and politely told me she would find a manager who could assist me. What she didn’t realize is she did not MUTE her phone and I heard how disrespectfully she made fun of me, my tone of voice, my accent and how laud she was laughing with her co-workers at my expense???.
After all the “fun” she had at my expense she came back to the line to “politely” tell me she was still looking for a manager…
Anyway, finally she put Tracy {Edited for privacy} (Desk ID: {Edited for privacy}) on the line whom claimed to be the manager, but now I am not sure anymore. She took a quick glance at my account and after I told her I just want Verizon to remove their equipment from my home because I just had it with them, she asked me if I could give her until tomorrow noon to check my account again and get back to me because she was seeing charges in my “NEW” account for new equipment and labor costs???
As you can tell I am extremely frustrated and disappointed at Verizon FIOS because not only they are playing with my bill, my account, my servicers, but they are also disrespectful, making fun at their customers who just happened to call and ask for help with their bill. This has become a nightmare for me and I just want Verizon FIOS to come and pick up their boxes so I could go back to some other service provider that could at least treat me with respect, they way customers should be treated, after all we are the ones who PAY for their services.
I am also afraid since Verizon FIOS doesn’t seem to care about anything they may push to rip me off and attempt to collect the $979.50 they are now charging me so I am seeking for legal help. If anyone knows how I should best handle this situation please let me know.
Regards,
Angel.

Dear AnneS,
I don't need to go to any other "private" forum to request what is my right to challenge my outrageous bill.
I had asked Verizon to remove their equipment from my home because I am closing this account.
Fortunately I am now working with consumer protection support to challenge the incredibly high bill Verizon is still attempting to collect from me.
Angel.   

Similar Messages

  • Soooo Frustrated setting my iPad - what a horrible experience this has been

    This is my first and probably last Apple experience. I got an iPad. I went to set it up. Guess what, first you have to download iTunes. Are those instructions in the iPad. NO. After downloading the iTunes app, then I have to register then I have HAVE to give credit card information. Are you fricking joking. I already paid you $500.00 for the iPad. You should NOT need my credit information to setup the iPad. Then I get to the **** page and I get a session timeout and must start all over. You have no idea how ****** off I am right now.
    Hearing how great the iPad is, I can tell you, I'm not pleased one bit. Two hours into this, and still the iPad is not working. This experience has been terrible!

    First off it says right on the outside of the box it needs iTunes.
    Second, it was asking for CC info because you were setting up an iTunes account, which is not mandatory in installing iTunes. But if you want to buy apps, music, books from iTunes, etc. you'll need the account. You can set one up without a credit card.
    Third, your network time out is being caused either by your firewall or your antivirus/antispware software. Temporarily disable all of them and try again.
    I am assuming you are using a Windows PC. In your settings it would be helpfull if you added this information.

  • Mission Control - What a horrible experience

    First off, I am a long time OSX user dating back to the initial release.
    Each iteration of the the OS has generally built upon the features of the prior version, and usually included new, exciting, usable features.
    Mission Control in Lion adds some new functionality for workspace and application window management.  It's another way to get around.
    Apple's mistake?  Removing Expose and Spaces.
    Has a single solitary person at Apple actually used Mission Control on a dual display setup?  No - Let me rephrase - I mean have they actually *used* it to get anything done?
    While in Mission Control, I can't move a window from the right display to the left?  Really?  What were you thinking, Apple?
    While in Mission Control, I can't see which display on the left goes with which display on the right?  How am I supposed to quickly move a window to the right monitor for an application shown on a left monitor?  No - Really - Try it.
    While in Mission Control, I can't see all of my application windows - Just some lame (and I mean LAME) stack of a couple of windows for the application.  Yes, I know I can swipe and see a little bit more, but I can never see all of them.
    Expose and Spaces could handle ALL of that above, and did it logically, and without any fuss.
    Mission Control isn't just "inconvenient", it is downright painful!
    Please - Please - Please - Put the option of Expose and Spaces back.  Mission Control may be "cool" for some configurations (laptops, etc), but for those of us who use OSX daily to get work done, it takes a multi-display Mac and makes it useless.
    Oh - And full screen apps?  Did ANYONE at Apple test that idea on dual display Macs?  Did you happen to notice that the full screen app makes the second monitor a fancy paperweight?

    I agree too.
    This is what I've sent to https://www.apple.com/feedback/macosx.html
    Feel free to use portions of the text to send your own feedback.
    Takes just a few seconds and probably helps to improve Mission Control. At least we have no other chance of pushing things.
    Dear Apple,
    having used Apple Systems since OS 7, it is a real pain to see, what you have done to the usability of Mac OSX with the switch to Mission Control.
    Has anyone of your engineers ever tried to use Mission Control on a dual display setup? I don't think so, otherwise you immediately should have realized, how broken it is:
    • You can't move a window from one display to the other.
    • You can't move windows between desktops. Instead you first have to go to each source desktop and move the windows from there to your destination desktops.
    • Usually you think in "dual display desktops" not in individual left and right desktops. The organization in Spaces, showing left and right display side by side, was logical. In Mission Control you permanently have to match left and right displays of a desktop by reading the desktop number or even worse count their position, aka. 3rd desktop from left.
    • You can't use your second display in full screen mode as it only shows a gray pattern. Unbelievable!
    I admit, Mission Control and Fullscreen Mode have their place on a MacBook Air, but for a big screen, dual display setup they are completely useless in their actual state.
    Currently reverting back to Snow Leopard is the only way to work efficiently with a dual display setup due to these flaws in Mission Control.
    I dearly ask you to bring back Spaces to Lion or bring over the missing functionality of Spaces to Mission Control, before Snow Leopard becomes unsupported by current software.
    I'm really disappointed, that even in 10.7.2 none of these issues are addressed.

  • What a horrible way to treat customers. I was due for updates on my phones and thought I should maybe check some other prices but have been with Verizon for 20 yrs so ended up there. I got 2 new IPhones 5s and the wife couldn't decide what she wanted so s

    What a horrible way to treat customers. I was due for updates on my phones and thought I should maybe check some other prices but have been with Verizon for 20 yrs so ended up there. I got 2 new IPhones 5s and the wife couldn’t decide what she wanted so she stayed with old phone but this locked me into a new 2 yr contract . Within a wk one of the new iPhones started turning on and of like 10 –15 times a day. Wk 2 it turned off and would not turn on again . It was my sons who was in college at the time so we talked and he took it in to a Verizon store where he was told I need to come in since the account was in my name. He was away from home , Verizon could see on account it was his phone they said it was not abused, they could not even turn it on , they sold me the phone give him another phone maybe even a loaner till he gets another. So now I need to go to store and explain to 3 different people this is my phone and my son has it and I need a new one. what a waste of time after about 2 hrs and talking to different people and yes they said there were notes on his account from other person he had talked to from different store. So I finally walk out with a receipt in hand and being told I would have a new phone in a couple days. As I sat in my vehicle thinking this is stupid I looked at my receipt and noticed it said droid on it so back into Verizon I went. The salesman said that’s what your son has on his account. My son had activated a friends old phone so he has one since VERIZON REFUSED to give him one. Another hr 3 people and yes they can see he had a new iPhone and notes on it from other store. Sometimes sorry just doesn't do it. I was now late for a appointment . Now I walk out and have been told I will get a new iPhone in the mail in about 2 wk Yes 2 wks   again I bought it there just give me a new one and you send old one back. I will also get a new droid that I have to send back because they said they cant cancel it  . In about 3 days I get the Droid and sent it back Verizon mistake and a waste of my time . After waiting over 2 wks and not receiving a new iPhone back to Verizon I went . I am now bitter at Verizon after doing 20 yrs of business with them. 3 people 1 hr later I was told it got delivered to my post office . I got the tracking num called the post office and they say o yes that was the droid. Go back in to Verizon another hr of explaining I walk out being told I will get a new iPhone in a couple of days, We’ll see . Once again I got the phone in your store just give me a new one . Do you realize how much of my time you have wasted ? do you care? O what is Your Policy ? How many Billion did you make last year ? I am Locked into a new 2 yr contract . Why don’t you just release me ? After 20 yrs do you think I will ever renew my contract ?

    Simple process. If an iPhone go to the Apple Store and not Verizon
    the phone from Verizon will be a refurbished device and not new unless under the 14 day worry free guarantee
    good luck

  • Bad experience with Verizon Fios Internet and Customer Service

    I had an extremely bad experience with Verizon Fios Internet service and I will never use Verizon again. 
    In August 2014, I called and installed the Verizon Fios Internet and phone bundle. I asked the customer agent several times if I will be charged anything before the installation of the Internet and phone service. She said, 'No, we will only start charging after the Internet and phone are installed at your apartment'. I went to the store and picked up the router and phone and installed it at home by myself. The router did not work. I called Tech support and they said it will take several days for another available agent to come and look into the issue. I decided to discontinue the service and closed the account that same night.
    At the end of the month, I received a bill of $80 of activation fee for the internet service. Nothing was ever activated, my internet router did not work, and I got charged an activation fee for a service that I did not even start using. From August to December, I called customer service over 10 times and some of them said they will waive it while the others said it's a non-refundable activation fee. One lady said, 'Ma'am, the activation fee starts when you placed the order, the warehouse received it and packed the router in the boxes....' Isn't that ridiculous? If that's the case, please ask all your customer representative to say a clause before new customers open their account: Are you aware that you will be charged a non-refundable activation fee once you open the account regardless of whether or not you use the service or not. 
    So after 3 months (November 2014), I decided to get out of all these troubles and paid off my $80 activation fee. They put the bill in the collection agency and I called them and paid the overdue balance. Then in December 2014, I received a statement saying I have a $3.11 overdue balance. The collection agency told me that they will charge me for the whole activation fee and a $3 transaction fee for the transaction. So now Verizon came back and said I owed them the $3 because I paid the collection agency their transaction fee. 
    I am very disappointed and furious about the whole Verizon operating system. Charging a customer for an activation fee for a service s/he has not consumed or used does not make any business sense. In addition, they do not know how to coordinate with the collection agency on overdue bills. Give the customer a heads-up that they will be charged a transaction fee on top of the overdue balance, and that transaction fee does not count towards clearing the balance. 
    I have completely lost my confidence in Verizon albeit the many good feedback from my friends. 

    Hi crystallau52,
    Sorry you are having difficulty. An agent with access to your account will reach out to you directly by email, private message in the Forums and/or the billing telephone number on your Verizon account for more information or to help you resolve your issue.

  • Switching from At&t to Verizon - Absolutely horrible experience

    I have been an At&t customer for 2 years and decided to switch to Verizon on August 16th. I ordered Droidx through Verizon store and the guy entered the wrong address. The phone was not delivered and sent back to the warehouse. Now, I already started receiving bills even though I dont have the phone. After going to the store many times and fighting on phone with Verizon support they decided to credit the bill. Now, to get Droidx I was asked to pay 350 again as they said the money would be credited back to my account immediately as soon as the phone is received by the warehouse. 
    Today I called up Verizon support and they informed me that they would send a cheque. The problem with support and the  {word filter avoidance} verizon store is they keep giving me the wrong information. I am still paying money to At&t because of this mistake. In the end, I am losing money and time. Here is what i feel about verizon: At&t are openly shameless about the fact that they have poor customer support while Verizon shows that it has good customer support but in reality they are worse than At&t. I regret the decision to switch and I wish someone could fix these issues.

    You have 30 days to cancel your Verizon service less a $35 restocking fee and possibly an activation fee on your phone line.  I would reccomend that you do this if you don't like the level of service you're getting from Verizon.
    What you are experiencing is basically how they do business, so if that's not satisfactory, they want you to leave.

  • Verizon FiOS Early Termination Fee and Very Poor Customer Service

    I posted this as a reply to an earlier thread... but think it deserves a little more attention....  please read.  Thank you.
    Re: Verizon FiOS Early Termination Fee -- Salesman AND Manager lied
    ‎08-09-201402:03 PM
    This is one organization that I will never do business with agan. You live and learn these days!!  They are insisting on charging me the early termination fee of $110.00 even though Verizon DOES NOT offer service in the area I am moving to this August.  My conversation with them today started like this:........ I asked if they had service at my new residential address. They indicating they did not and then I was immediately transferred  to their "disconnect" department.   In this "disconnect" department.....  I was told I would have to pay that termination fee anyway regardless of the fact that Verizon does not offer service in that area.  This was stated per someone named "Jay" representing Verizon....  This Jay  would NOT even consider waiving the termination fee at all...  so I asked to speak with his supervisor and got some complete jackass named Freddy who also  tells me I must take the HD Set Top boxes to a "corporate" UPS location and that they will not waive my termination fee just because??   So I asked for his last name... which he did not give me... but did give what he said was his employee ID number.  ( who really knows if that was a legitimate ID number anyway)  So why is it that  they would not  be willing to waive the fee??  For me ...it  is simple to explain..... Because I complained about  it.... that is why!!   Verizon is very wrong here and this "Freddy" character should be immediately fired.  The company's customer service  does need an immediate overhaul....  and this Freddy  guy is playing with the good name of what once was a very reputable company.   However... now.... because Verizon  have no legimate process for immediate or quick complaint resolutions,  they are  quickly becoming a company that many people do not want to do business with anymore.  I had a similar experience with  Verizon Wireless as well;  when I cancelled their service earlier this year..... It is not that the fee that bugs me so much.... even though it makes little sense......It is Verizon's lack of professional customer service and the questionable ethics of many of this company's representatives that has left such a distaste that I will never do business with them anymore.  Just my 2 cents... for what it might be worth.

    I have also had horrible service with Verizon customer service and their ETF.  I moved to a new area that Verizon fios does not cover.  When I moved into the new house a few weeks ago, I attempted to cancel their service, but I was told I had to keep it until my phone number was ported to Charter.  I called Verizon to cancel my internet/Fios TV only and they said it would be taken care of.  
    Charter sent a request to them on 11/24/14 to port my phone number and Verizon denied the request a week later.  I initially thought it was Charter messing up the port but come to find out, it was Verizon.  I called Verizon on 12/08/14 and I was told they denied the port due to an "outstanding" bill.  Well that bill was for the month in advance, which doesn't make sense because I had already canceled the service.  So they were charging me for the phone, internet, and TV at an empty house.  Verizon made me pay the bill so I could get my phone number ported. I paid the fee and they said the the number  was ready to be ported.  On 12/10/14 I received a call from Charter saying Verizon denied the port AGAIN!!!.  So I called Verizon and according to them, Charter never requested the number.  That doesn't make sense because I’m sure Charter is doing everything they can because they aren't being paid until that number gets ported over.
    I asked the Verizon agents to give me something in writing so I could put it back on Charter but they refused to do so.  (Charter gave me written proof documenting Verizon denying the port, so I know Verizon was lying.)  So after dealing with Verizon and their laziness I canceled my phone number, which will cause me a lot of heartache in the future.  The agent then asked if I was canceling the FIOS TV and Internet.  I told him it should have already been canceled, but it wasn't.  So they said it will cancel today after they already took my money for the month.  
    I asked to speak to a supervisor and they agent said, "Why, she wont be able to do anything."  I asked him again and he finally agreed to transfer me over.  After a 10 minute wait a lady named Karyn I believe, answered the phone.  I explained to her how my phone number was not being ported and she said "We don’t block a port, Charter must have messed it up.”  I asked her for written documentation and she refused to provide me with anything.  I explained to her the reason why I had to move into a new house, due to work and my safety and she said, “Well if your military I could help you but I’m sorry I cant.”  She said the only way to get out of paying for the ETF, is if I was deployed over seas fighting a war.  Then she said if someone were to die, she could waive the fee...thats ridiculous.  
    I asked her if I was going to have to pay for the past few weeks of my service, even though I tried to cancel it and they held up my order and she said, “Ill credit you $11.00.”  Thats nothing when my bill is $150.00 a month.  She did nothing to help even though Verizon dropped the ball on this.  Over all I am very disgusted with the employees and supervision with Verizon and I will most likely never to business with them again, unless they admit their mistakes and make it right.  I have given them thousands of dollars and hours of my time and this is how they repay you.  Oh and by the way, they want me to drive down to the UPS store and return their boxes for them.  So they can inconvenience me further. 

  • Pros and Cons of Verizon FiOS TV vs Comcast

    I recently (two weeks ago) switched from Comcast to Verizon FiOS TV in the Portland, OR area and I have mixed feelings about it.  There are several things that are better, but also many that are worse than Comcast.
    I'll get the bad things out of the way... and maybe I'm wrong about a few of them:
    CONS
    -- My most expensive Mitsubishi TV that has worked fine on everthing via HDMI for the past 6 months (Comcast Motorola HD DVR, PS3, Wii, Wireless Media Extender) will not work via HDMI with the Verizon Motorola STB.  Green screen of death.  I don't have any optical audio cables, so I'm currently running with component cables and regular audio (which sucks).  This is horrible.
    -- Changing channels sometimes doesn't work.  This happens when I'm flipping through channels using the Channel +/- buttons.  I'll hit + and the on screen display will say it has changed channels, but the previous channel's video and audio are still on the screen.  I have to change to the next channel and back again to get it to synch up.  This happens a lot.
    -- The DVR skip buttons are nearly worthless to the impatient (read: me).  If you hit the skip button too fast, it either doesn't skip at all or causes the video to go blank.  On my other TV which is working via HDMI, this makes it have a green screen of death and I have to turn the TV off and back on.  This is a big deal for me.  I'm used to hitting the skip button quickly a set number of times to skip past known lenghts of commercial breaks.  I simply can't do that with Verizon.  I have to hit the skip, wait a couple of seconds, hit the skip again, wait a couple of seconds, hit the skip again, oops... it didn't skip... I must not have waited long enough, hit skip again.  THIS IS INFURIATING.
    -- If I have rewound back into a certain channel's buffer, as far as I can tell there is no way to immediately return to live TV.  Comcast's remote had a LIVE button that would skip to the end of the buffer without clearing it.  The only way I've figured out to do it is change channels then come back to the original channel, but this sometimes clears the buffer so that isn't acceptable.
    -- I can't adjust the end time of an already recording program.  This comes up frequently, especially with sporting events and programs that have been delayed because of sporting events preceding them.  I'll sit down in the middle of a show and start playing the recording from the beginning but notice the basketball game before it is still finishing.  I want to extend the end time of the recording so I can start watching it immediately from the end of the basketball game and not have to worry about whether it will be in the buffer or not.
    -- If I have two succesive shows set to record, there are several seconds dropped between the two shows in the recordings.  Comcast would miss one maybe two seconds... Verizon misses almost 10.  Why does this matter?  Well, sometimes shows run a little long and with Comcast I would be guaranteed to see the end of that program on the beginning of the next recording.  Not so with Verizon.  For example, The Daily Show and The Colbert Report.  Frequently the "moment of zen" at the end of The Daily Show is a few seconds after the end time of the show.  I could always see it at the beginning of the Colbert Report recording with Comcast. Now it is completely gone on the Verizon recordings.  South Park always runs several seconds long, but now I miss the end of every episode because it's not at the beginning of the Reno 911 recording.  THIS IS REALLY INFURIATING.
    -- Whether or not a show is New is not easily discernable from the guide.  The "New" icon needs to be one of the ones that show up in the guide listing, not just the info screen.  Having to hit the Info button to tell if a show is new or not really annoys me.
    -- The DVR does not offer to automatically extend the end time for live events as Comcast's did.  I have to go through several annoying steps to extend the end time.
    PROS
    -- I can record sporting events as a series, which Comcast didn't let me do.  This is great!  I no longer have to go through the guide and manually record English Premier League, Champions League or MLS games.  I just set up series recordings.  This, I REALLY like.
    -- The channel selection is way better (more HD, more music, more sports)
    -- I don't have to buy the entire latin language channel package just to get Gol TV which has english audio too.  THANK YOU!
    -- The series recordings do a much better job with cable shows that repeat a gazillion times a week than Comcast's did.  I couldn't even set many cable shows to be series recordings on Comcast or it would fill up my DVR.  THIS IS EXCELLENT.
    -- Changing what series are being recorded or their priority doesn't cause all the shows you removed from the recording schedule to magically appear back in the schedule to be recorded like Comcast's DVR does.  THIS ROCKS.
    So, there are several things I like a lot better than Comcast but there are also many things I hate about Verizon so far.  Coupled with the fact that my FiOS router just stopped working last night (blinking red light) requiring a new router to be sent meaning I'll have no internet all weekend (I'm at work right now), the fact that they still haven't buried the fiber and the fact that the installer lied to me about the green screen of death on my Mitsubishi, I'm seriously second guessing my decision to switch.

    Yeah that's exactly why HBO says no HD On Demand, even though it makes zero sense since it's no different than watching a regular HD broadcast. I don't find it too big of a deal though considering all of the HD HBO channels Fios has combined with HBO airing everything a million times a week. Plus, if it keeps HBO from putting those annoying logos and banners like the other premium channels (Starz, Showtime, etc.) then I'm fine with it. If I'm paying extra money for a channel, it shouldn't have those in my opinion. HBO and Fios will have to add more HD On Demand for free relatively soon in order to stay competitive. It should be an easy thing for them to do.
    The SD picture is better with a 7216 DVR than the 6416 DVRs. I also switched from Comcast and the SD picture with my 7216 is very noticeably better than Comcast's boxes, so I'd try playing around with your settings or switching to a 7216 box if you don't have one. Almost everybody I've talked to thinks their SD picture is better than comcast's. Mine, although not as clear as HD obviously, isn't pixelated or blurry at all. Even G4, a channel owned by Comcast, is greatly improved over Comcast's signal. G4 on Comcast was almost unwatchable it was so pixelated. Since Fios is fiber, they don't hav e to compress and degrade the signal as much as Comcast does .

  • Sudden increase in Verizon FIOS internet & digital voice problems. No resolutions.

    We have had Verizon FIOS internet since Jan. 2008.  It has been reasonably reliable.  No disconnects... until mid-Dec 2012 when they started with a vengeance.  E-mail connections dropped (we had to re-start Outlook).  Usually, we couldn't "see" them in internet connections, but ping tests proved that they were occurring between aboaut 4 p.m. and midnight, rarely, if ever, during other hours of the day.
    We have had Verizon FIOS digital telephone (conversion from analog) for about one year.  It has reasonably reliable until mid-Dec when multiple problems occurred:  no stutter tone for voice mail, no notification on telephone "screen" for voice mail, no callers' names on "screen" (only "Out of Area"), and so on.  Each time, Verizon re-sets "the line" and it's okay for 24 to 36 hours, maybe 48 hours, if we're lucky.
    We've called repair over 20 times, which is above and beyond what sane people would do.  Now, we've had EEE-NUFF.
    Has anyone had the same experiences?  If yes, how did you resolve them?
    We're ready to chuck Verizon, but we haven't heard anything good about the few competitors around here.  That is, we don't want to go from the frying pan into the fire, BUT we want the above-noted problems fixed. 
    Thank you.

    We have had Verizon FIOS internet since Jan. 2008.  It has been reasonably reliable.  No disconnects... until mid-Dec 2012 when they started with a vengeance.  E-mail connections dropped (we had to re-start Outlook).  Usually, we couldn't "see" them in internet connections, but ping tests proved that they were occurring between aboaut 4 p.m. and midnight, rarely, if ever, during other hours of the day.
    We have had Verizon FIOS digital telephone (conversion from analog) for about one year.  It has reasonably reliable until mid-Dec when multiple problems occurred:  no stutter tone for voice mail, no notification on telephone "screen" for voice mail, no callers' names on "screen" (only "Out of Area"), and so on.  Each time, Verizon re-sets "the line" and it's okay for 24 to 36 hours, maybe 48 hours, if we're lucky.
    We've called repair over 20 times, which is above and beyond what sane people would do.  Now, we've had EEE-NUFF.
    Has anyone had the same experiences?  If yes, how did you resolve them?
    We're ready to chuck Verizon, but we haven't heard anything good about the few competitors around here.  That is, we don't want to go from the frying pan into the fire, BUT we want the above-noted problems fixed. 
    Thank you.

  • Success with adding an external eSATA drive to a Verizon FIOS DVR

    August 4, 2012 - Success with adding an external eSATA drive to a Verizon FIOS DVR
    I just upgraded from a Comcast DVR to a Verizon FIOS DVR.   I upgraded because my old DVR was limited to 500GB (1/2 TB) on the internal drive and the new FIOS DVR allowed for a much larger external eSATA drive.   Selecting a viable external drive for the FIOS DVR was easier said than done.  The three drives listed on the Verizon web site as compatible with FIOS DVRs are no longer manufactured by western digital and are not available on the market.
    The DVR that I received from Verizon was a Cisco "CHS 435 HD DVR" that came with a 500GB (1/2 TB) internal drive.   This is one of their "Multi-Room DVRs" that allows other set top boxes (not DVRs) to watch videos recorded on it.
    I selected a western digital "WD30EURS" eSATA disk drive because it was a follow on product to one of the three listed as acceptable by Verzion on their web page and it was 3TB in size.  I ordered from amazon.com for $170.99.  This drive is a "bare drive" so it does not come with an external encloser or a eSATA cable.  
    According to the Western Digial web site this is a AV-GP drive:  "These drives are designed to last in high temperature always-on, streaming digital audio/video environments such as PVR/DVR, IPTV, and video surveillance systems."
    http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/library/AAG/ENG/2178-771131.pdf 
    I got a "Macally G-S350SU Hi-Speed eSata/USB2.0 External Storage Enclosure for 3.5inch SATA HDD" to hold the drive for $34.39.  I chose this one because it does not use a fan that could cause continious noise.  The box is made out of metal so it cools itself as long as it is exposed to air (not covered up).  This box comes with an external power supply that has a small transformer that plugs into a wall outlet.
    Then I needed a eSATA cable.  I got a "StarTech 6-Feet Shielded External eSATA Cable M/M (ESATA6)" for $6.50 and a 3-foot version for $5.90.  I went with the longer one so that the cable would be less likely to become accidentally unplugged if I need to move the drive or the DVR.  The cables and the drive houseing came from the same Amazon provider so it saved me on shipping. The drive came from Amazon/Western Digial directly but they do not have external housings or eSATA cables on that site.
    The total cost was $255.56 including shipping for all these items.  
    I went with the largest (3TB) drive from western digial's AV-GP line to avoid a future upgrade from a smaller drive to a larger drive.   There is no way to copy videos from one external eSATA drive to another drive because they are formatted by the FIOS DVR in a propriatary format.  That would mean that any future upgrade would require losing all recorded files during an upgrade.  That also means that there is no way to back up the contents of the drive to protect yourself from hard drive failure.
    The installer who setup the DVR did not want me to plug in the drive while he was there and explained that I was on my own when I attached this kind of personal device to the DVR.  When I plugged in the new eSATA drive it was automatically discovered.  I was asked by the DVR if I wanted to format the new drive.  I answered yes and within 2 hours the drive completed formatting.   I did not watch the boring format so it could have finished faster.   
    When I started recording new videos they go directly to the external drive automatically and avoids the internal drive.  It had no trouble recording two HD shows and playing a recording at the same time.  I now have 20 hours of HD video recorded and the 3TB external drive is 17% full.  So far my experience with the external drive has been great.   No problems or issues.   Learning the new remote control, new DVR menu system, and web browser control of the DVR from a laptop is another story.  It will take some time to figure out how to make all the new features work.
    It took me a while to figure out how to make this work since the verizon web site made useless suggestions and pointed me to products that are not available any more.  I could not tell if this really would work until I plugged it in and then I was pleasantly suprised that it did.  I have had this working for 3 days without any issues.  I hope this post makes it easier for you to add an external eSATA drive to your DVR.
    Here are the three items ordered from Amazon to make this work:
    Western Digital 3 TB AV-GP 3 TB SATA 2 Intellipower 64 MB Cache Bulk/OEM 3.5-Inch Internal Bare Driv...
    Macally G-S350SU Hi-Speed eSata/USB2.0 External Storage Enclosure for 3.5inch SATA HDD
    StarTech 6-Feet Shielded External eSATA Cable M/M (ESATA6)

    You are right. I can only access 2TB of my 3TB external drive. That gives me a total of 2.5 TB counting the internal (0.5 TB) and external (2.0 TB) drives. This is a significant improvement over the just the 0.5 TB internal drive. I have not been able to find a reason for this limitation. Cisco and Verizon do not mention any limits that I can find. I hope that a future BIOS upgrade could provide access to more space but this would probably require me to reformat the drive and lose everything recorded.
    I paid $170.99 for the 3 TB WD30EURS drive at amazon. I could have gotten away with spending only $116.99 for the 2 TB WD20EURS drive. Not worth returning at this point so I will stay with it. Makes me glad I didn't buy the most expensive 6 TB external  monster drive available from another company.
    I bought: 3TB drive: Western Digital 3 TB AV-GP 3 TB SATA 2 Intellipower 64 MB Cache Bulk/OEM 3.5-Inch Internal Bare Drive WD30EURS by Western Digital
    I could have bought: 2TB drive: Western Digital AV-GP 2 TB SATA II Intellipower 64 MB Cache Bulk/OEM Internal Hard Drive - WD20EURS by Western Digital
    Details of what I learned:
    The external 2 TB drive now has 41 hours of HD video recorded and claims to be 34% full (66% free). My estimate would allow me to have aprox 120 hours of HD on the external drive (2TB) and 30 hours of HD on the internal drive (500GB) for a total of 150 hours of HD. This will keep me happy for the near future.
    There is a hidden "diagnostic menu" that is not normally accessible or documented by CISCO or Verizon. This menu has a lot of interesting info on the inner working of the DVR. There was an obscure reference to this menu on another forum.
    To access this diagnostics menu:
    1) Get the DVR into normal live tv mode (no menu, no guide, no pause ...)
    2) Go to the Cisco CHS 435 HD DVR (not the remote control) and press these buttons on the front of the DVR: Press both the Left Arrow "<-" button and "OK" button at the same time and hold them both down for aprox 5 seconds.
    3) The "Verizon FiOS TV Diagnostics Menu" menu will appear. The menu can then be used by the remote control.
    4) I chose "D03 Memory / HDD" and then "Hard Disk Information" and finally "OK"
    A five page disk report appeared. With a little bit of interpretation I discovered:
    The Internal Drive is know as "drive 1/hdc1" has 461 GB total space with 454 GB free.
    The External Drive is split into two partitions "hdc2" and "hdc3" (aka two mount points).
    "drive 2/hdc2" has 1007 MB total with 317 GB free
    "drive 3/hdc3" has 1007 MB total with 974 GB free
    The normal DVR menu has an "Eject" feature that allows you to stop the external drive and make it safe to remove it from the DVR without losing anything via an unplanned drive removal. This can be found at "DVR" button on remote then "Settings"->"External Hard Drive"->"Eject".

  • Port-forwarding or UPnP on VERIZON FIOS modem/router

    I'm trying to help someone access his home network remotely from another location. he just got the new Verizon FIOS network.
    i'm new to the world of port-forwarding and UPnP forwarding, but have learned a lot in a short period of time.
    I can easily setup port-forwarding and UPnP forwarding (necessary to setup the afp file sharing, screen sharing, etc) on Linksys routers that have those capabilities.
    My friend just got the new Verizon FIOS network installed. It is smoking fast both up and down. We figured out that the box Verizon provided him (it's a fairly huge thing) is an internet modem, a router, and a wireless router all in one.
    And once we accessed its control panel, I definitely saw places where we could configure port-forwarding........
    but it's not quite as straightforward as it is on a Linksys router in that, on a Linksys, if I want to open a specific port, like 5900, for screen sharing, I can easily type in the numbers 5900 and type the IP address of the computer on my LAN that I wish to forward port 5900 traffic to.......or I can do this with UPnP forwarding....either way it is simply and fully controllable.
    But on this Verizon box, it seems to have most standard ports and protocols stored in presets that you must choose from. For example, if I wanted to setup port forwarding for FTP traffic, I would choose FTP from the dropdown menu and then the router would automatically know to forward port 21 to the computer of my choice.
    but we specifically want to turn on AFP for apple file sharing, which is port 548. On the Linksys, i could simply type port 548. But this Verizon router does not show a service called AFP. It has a nice LONG menu of many different pre-set options, but AFP is not one of them. Would it be called something else on a device like this that is obviously not specifically designed to know Apple's file sharing protocol?
    So would anyone know what kind of service I should look for that opens port 548 for file sharing?
    Anyone have experience with these new Verizon routers/modems yet? I'd really love to find a way to type everything in manually, but I dunno if that's possible on this unit.
    i know there's a lot here. thank you to anyone who knows about this and can shed some light

    That doesn't work because applications that initiate outbound connections are given randomly assigned 5-digit port numbers (e.g., 49144) through which the CLIENT communicates. The "well known" port numbers like 548 for afp, 22 for ssh, 80 for web servers, etc., are for the SERVER function to which the server daemon listens. Example: you don't send the request to download your email from your pop 110 (or 995 when using SSL), or from your imap 143 (or 993 when using SSL); that's the port number at the DESTINATION server to where your traffic is delivered, i.e., the port to which that SERVER is listening for incoming traffic. Same for when you send mail, you send from some randomly assigned five-digit port number TO the smtp server's port 25. You can see this by launching Terminal.app from an admin-privileged account and typing sudo tcpdump -i en1 (use en1 for airport, en0 for wired ethernet) and looking at the packet transmissions' headers.

  • Airport Extreme (802.11n) and Verizon FIOS

    I have Verizon FIOS, previously connected with their Actiontec Wireless router. I removed that router and connected to a Belkin Pre N router no problem.
    Today I purchased the new Airport Extreme and my intent was to use it as the only connection point for FIOS. However I can't get it to connect to the internet. I get the flashing amber light no matter what.
    I verified with Verizon that I am on DHCP, not PPPoE, and that's how it worked/works with the Belkin. The only way I can get it to work with the Airport Extreme is if I put the AEBS into Bridge Mode disable the radio on the Belkin and connect the Belkin to the AEBS.
    I've also updated the AEBS to Firmware 7.1.1 to see if that helped, no dice.
    Does anyone have any experience with the Airport Extreme Base Station working with Verizon FIOS?
    I'd appreciate any assistance you might be able to provide.

    For anyone who wants to know I got this working.
    I reset the AEBS and left all connections and the router unpulgged overnight. This morning I reconfigured the router (DHCP) with my desired security settings reconnected and powered up and now everything's functioning as it should using only the Airport Exteme Base Station. No more bridging!

  • 2nd Gen iPod Touch Reboots Westell 9100EM Verizon FiOS Router

    I've been round and round with Verizon FiOS with no answers yet.
    My iPod Touch 2nd Gen 16GB 3.0 will connect successfully to my FiOS router wirelessly...but as soon as I try to access my mail or any internet site my router reboots. I just got FiOS a week or so ago. They have replaced the router but I still have the same issue. I never had this problem with my cable provider that I had in the past and using my Linksys WRT54G router. As a test, I connected my Linksys to my FiOS router as an access point and turned the wireless off on my FiOS router. As soon as attempted to get my mail on the iPod...the FiOS router rebooted again...but not the Linksys. I have tried using WPA w/TKIP (which I used on my Linksys) as well as WEP (although I don't like WEP).
    I'm a Systems Engineer by trade and do this kind of troubleshooting for a living but this has me stumped. Anyone else experience this or have any ideas?

    Wow, I never have heard of a device causing a router to reboot. I've got one idea about what could be happening but it is too strange to be the cause. Try updating the router DNS addresses to something that works - like OpenDNS.
    Also, I would ask Verizon for another router. Other people certainly don't have this problem.

  • Verizon FIOS Intermitte​nt Packet Loss Problem - How to Convince Verizon Support it's NOT ME

    Hi,
    I have been having a problem with Verizon FIOS Internet AND Phone since Thursday afternoon.
    Basically I have intermittent outages several times a day of 15-40 seconds where my download doesn't work, but upload still does. This happens on BOTH my phone and internet. Therefore it's not my router or computer equipment causing the problem.
    Here's what happens:
    - On the internet: I have a periodic download problem where I can receive no data for about 15 - 40 seconds. After that it returns to normal
    - On the phone: If I'm on the phone at the same time then during that period of internet loss I also can not hear anything that the person I am talking to says. However they can hear me just fine (ie. download only problem)
    I have been talking to Verizon technical support and they have blamed my router and ONT. I have tried switching off the router, and using a different one. Also they have replaced the ONT twice.
    * This problem occurs on BOTH the phone and internet at the same time. This clearly suggests the problem is not in my own house.
    In fact I know exactly where the problem lies. I did a traceroute to google below:
    Tracing route to google.com [74.125.113.106]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
      1     4 ms     1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.1
      2     5 ms     4 ms     4 ms  L300.NWRKNJ-VFTTP-122.verizon-gni.net [74.105.157.1]
      3     9 ms     8 ms     7 ms  G2-0-0-1822.NWRKNJ-LCR-08.verizon-gni.net [130.81.133.156]
      4    11 ms     8 ms     7 ms  P15-0.NWRKNJ-LCR-07.verizon-gni.net [130.81.30.148]
      5     9 ms     6 ms     7 ms  so-5-0-0-0.NWRK-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.29.8]
      6     7 ms     6 ms     7 ms  0.so-7-0-0.XL3.EWR6.ALTER.NET [152.63.19.177]
      7     9 ms    10 ms     9 ms  0.so-1-0-1.XL3.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.0.213]
      8     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  TenGigE0-6-0-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.22.41]
      9    33 ms    31 ms    35 ms  google-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.62]
     10     8 ms    11 ms    10 ms  209.85.252.215
     11    18 ms    17 ms    16 ms  209.85.249.11
     12    31 ms    29 ms    29 ms  209.85.241.222
     13    30 ms    29 ms    29 ms  209.85.241.207
     14    41 ms    39 ms    34 ms  209.85.243.1
     15    27 ms    27 ms    29 ms  vw-in-f106.1e100.net [74.125.113.106]
    Trace complete.
    Then I pinged each device for hops 2-4. When the problem occurs the first one in the hop - 74.105.157.1 - runs fine. The second device - 130.81.133.156 - times out, and all other devices further down the chain time out. This clearly suggest that the device:
    130.81.133.156 has major problems.
    I have mentioned this to tech support, but they have no way for me to send them logs. Apparently the support technicians at Verizon can not be trusted with even the most basic of tools like email and the web. They also shield me from the NT (Network technician), who is so special that even the tech support guys are only allowed to text chat with him, not actually talk to him. I have enough logs here to clearly show what the problem is.
    The latest from tech support is that they are sending yet another guy by my house tomorrow to witness this problem firsthand. Then he will call support that will text chat with the NT, and MAYBE they'll start thinking it's not me.
    My main question here is: "How do I get Verizon to believe it really could be a problem in their own network?"
    Here are some threads from last year that explain exactly the same problem I'm having. So it wasn't just me:
    http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-TV-Technical-Ass​istance/Verizon-FIOS-intermittent-connection-drops​...
    http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/Intermi​ttent-Network-Timeouts/m-p/28138
    One person said Verizon finally fixed it by replacing a PON card. I'm not sure if this is the same problem as that though.
    I am an avid Starcraft player and this is driving me crazy because I am getting dropped from my games all the time. Also phone conversations suck when there's these big lags where I can't hear who I'm talking to.
    I have had Verizon FIOS internet for 3 years now and this is the first problem I've ever had with it. But I'm starting to get majorly frustrated at how long it's taking to resolve the problem.
    Here is a sample of the ping logs I was talking about for different devices all at the same time.
    Device 2 in the Trace Route:
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
    Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=126
    Device 3 in the Trace Route:
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=253
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
    Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=253
    Device 4 in the Trace Route:
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
    Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
    Any help, thoughts, suggestions, etc would be great appreciated!
    ~David

    I understand your logic, but you have not eliminated 74.105.157.1 as the problem.  It could be allowing packets out, like outside callers hearing you, but not allow them back in. Since you have results pinging out, trying ping back in. Use this packet loss tool.  You do not need to catch it when it's not working because this tool will ping your IP address (and all the hops in between) for up to 7 days. You will easily see when packet loss is occurring.
    If it can successfully ping 74.105.157.1 when the problem occurrs, then 130.81.133.156 is not the issue. This may not help dealing with the personalities at Verizon, but it will help definitively knowing which device is the issue.

  • How do I set up a Apple TC with a Verizon FIOS wireless modem model  Actiontec 424wi F series.  Does the wifi in the modem have to be shut off and will it effect the FIOS tv?

    How do I set up an Apple TC with a Verizon FIOS wireless modem model MI424wr F.  Does the wifi have to be turned off in the modem and then bridge it to the TC?  Will FIOS tv be effected?

    Your first call should be to Verizon support to ask them if you turn off the wireless on the Actiontec router....will it affect any of the features/functions of the FIOS system?
    If yes, then it would be best to leave the Actiontec router "as is" and connect the Time Capsule using Ethernet in Bridge Mode as a back up device only (wireless is turned off on the Time Capsule).
    If you want to use the dual band (and likely much faster) wireless capability of the Time Capsule, then you should turn off the wireless on the Actiontec device to help prevent wireless interference effects that will likely occur when two wireless routers are in close proximity to each other.
    Again, the Time Capsule would be connected to the Actiontec router using an Ethernet connection from one of the LAN <-> ports on the Actiontec router to the WAN port (circle icon) on the Time Capsule. Configure the Time Capsule in Bridge Mode as well in this type of configuration.
    Bottom line....what Verizon says will pretty much dictate how you can set up the TIme Capsule.

Maybe you are looking for