Version of jvm.dll compatible with 64-bit development on Visual Studio 2013?

Hi. I am building a 64-bit C++ application under Visual Studio 2013. I am using jvm.dll to call Java methods from within the application. The issue is that the version of jvm.dll that is distributed with Java 7 and Java 8 are compiled with Visual Studio 2010 (and thus rely on the msvcr100.dll runtime library). This makes it very dangerous to use with a Visual Studio 2013 application which uses msvcr120.dll (mixing runtime libraries is a very big no-no). I am seeing random memory errors as a result, at the JNI interface level.
Is there any way to get a version of jvm.dll that is compiled with Visual Studio 2013 and is thus dependent on msvcr120.dll?
Thanks,
Dan

Hello,
As per your description, remote deployment is not possible for server side code in sharepoint so if you are using server object model then you won't be able to debug or deploy your solution from visual studio.
VS is not required to installed on UAT/prod server but you need sharepoint along with visual studio in same development machine to develop any custom webpart.
Once you deploy your custom webpart on site then you will be able to see that webpart in webpart gallery and that gallery is also available in designer so it means you can also add your custom webpart from designer to any page.
Correct me if i misunderstood you
Hemendra:Yesterday is just a memory,Tomorrow we may never see
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help

Similar Messages

Intermittent import library generation failure building 64-bit binary in Visual Studio 2013

I have a 64-bit c++ project that randomly fails to build because the import library generation silently fails in the link step. I have scoured the "diagnostic level" log trying to find some hint at why the import library
fails to be created, but there doesn't seem to be any information.
It's pretty random. When it fails, I can do a clean build and everything builds. After a successful build, I can do another clean rebuild and see it fail again.
The 32-bit version consistently builds fine. I see the 64-bit problem regularly in any configuration (Release or Debug).
I'm running VS2013 Update 2 RC.
Any hints on how to debug this? Is this a known issue for which there is a patch?

Hi Anna, thanks for the reply. Yes, this does reproduce in MSBuild if you specify a rebuild. As mentioned previously, if you do a clean and build, even through MSBuild, the build succeeds every time.
There's no way for me to create a sample project. Our codebase is quite large and this doesn't reproduce for simple example projects.
There is no error message when the iTunes.lib import library fails to build. The import library is used in a dependent project and that fails in a way you would probably expect (complains about a missing .lib)...
Here's the relevant section from my diagnostic build output.
16> Tracking command: (TaskId:92)
16> C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\12.0\bin\Tracker.exe /a /d "C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\12.0\bin\FileTracker.dll" /i C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\intermediates\iTunesLauncher\iTunesLauncher.tlog /r "C:\USERS\PSANSONE\ITUNES\BUILDRESULTS\DEBUG64\BIN\ITUNES.LIB|C:\USERS\PSANSONE\ITUNES\BUILDRESULTS\DEBUG64\INTERMEDIATES\ITUNESLAUNCHER\APPLEAPPLICATIONSUPPORT.OBJ|C:\USERS\PSANSONE\ITUNES\BUILDRESULTS\DEBUG64\INTERMEDIATES\ITUNESLAUNCHER\ITUNESLAUNCHER.OBJ|C:\USERS\PSANSONE\ITUNES\BUILDRESULTS\DEBUG64\INTERMEDIATES\ITUNESLAUNCHER\ITUNESLAUNCHER.RES|C:\USERS\PSANSONE\ITUNES\BUILDRESULTS\DEBUG64\INTERMEDIATES\ITUNESLAUNCHER\VISUALSTUDIOPREFIX.OBJ"
/b MSBuildConsole_CancelEvent293fb138735a4f31a04ade4d72d60766 /c "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\VC\bin\x86_amd64\link.exe" /ERRORREPORT:PROMPT /OUT:"C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\bin\iTunes.exe" /INCREMENTAL:NO
/NOLOGO comctl32.lib libcmtd.lib libcpmtd.lib shlwapi.lib kernel32.lib user32.lib gdi32.lib winspool.lib comdlg32.lib advapi32.lib shell32.lib ole32.lib oleaut32.lib uuid.lib odbc32.lib odbccp32.lib /NODEFAULTLIB /MANIFEST:NO /DEBUG /PDB:"C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\bin\iTunes.exe.pdb"
/SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS /STACK:"1048576","262144" /TLBID:1 /DYNAMICBASE /FIXED:NO /NXCOMPAT /IMPLIB:"C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\bin\iTunes.lib" /MACHINE:X64 C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\intermediates\iTunesLauncher\iTunesLauncher.res
16> C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\intermediates\iTunesLauncher\AppleApplicationSupport.obj
16> C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\intermediates\iTunesLauncher\VisualStudioPrefix.obj
16> C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\intermediates\iTunesLauncher\iTunesLauncher.obj
16> C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\bin\iTunes.lib (TaskId:92)
16>LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input file 'C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\bin\iTunes.lib'
Here's the relevant part of the build log from the linker step that should build iTunes.lib (the import library that fails to build).
15> Creating library C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\bin\iTunes.lib and object C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\bin\iTunes.exp (TaskId:92)
15>Done executing task "Link". (TaskId:92)
15>Task "Message" (TaskId:93)
15> Task Parameter:Text=iTunesDLL.vcxproj -> C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\bin\iTunes.dll (TaskId:93)
15> Task Parameter:Importance=High (TaskId:93)
15> iTunesDLL.vcxproj -> C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\bin\iTunes.dll (TaskId:93)
15>Done executing task "Message". (TaskId:93)
15>Done building target "Link" in project "iTunesDLL.vcxproj".: (TargetId:209)
15>Target "MetaGenInputsOutputs" skipped, due to false condition; ('$(EnableManagedIncrementalBuild)' == 'True') was evaluated as ('false' == 'True').
15>Target "ComputeMetaGenInputs" skipped, due to false condition; ('$(CLRSupport)'!='' and '$(CLRSupport)'!='false') was evaluated as ('false'!='' and 'false'!='false').
15>Target "MetaGen" skipped, due to false condition; ('@(MetaGen)' != '') was evaluated as ('' != '').
15>Target "ComputeLinkImportLibraryOutputsForClean: (TargetId:210)" in file "C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\V120\Microsoft.CppBuild.targets" from project "C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\iTunes\Projects\iTunesDLL.vcxproj" (target "_Link" depends
on it):
15>Task "WriteLinesToFile" (TaskId:94)
15> Task Parameter:File=C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\intermediates\iTunesDLL\iTunesDLL.tlog\iTunesDLL.write.1u.tlog (TaskId:94)
15> Task Parameter:
15> Lines=
15> ^C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\iTunes\Projects\iTunesDLL.vcxproj
15> C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\bin\iTunes.lib
15> C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\BuildResults\Debug64\bin\iTunes.exp (TaskId:94)
15> Task Parameter:Encoding=Unicode (TaskId:94)
15>Done executing task "WriteLinesToFile". (TaskId:94)
15>Done building target "ComputeLinkImportLibraryOutputsForClean" in project "iTunesDLL.vcxproj".: (TargetId:210)
15>Target "AfterLink: (TargetId:211)" in file "C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\V120\Microsoft.CppBuild.targets" from project "C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\iTunes\Projects\iTunesDLL.vcxproj" (target "_Link" depends on it):
15>Done building target "AfterLink" in project "iTunesDLL.vcxproj".: (TargetId:211)
15>Target "_Link: (TargetId:212)" in file "C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\V120\Microsoft.CppBuild.targets" from project "C:\Users\psansone\iTunes\iTunes\Projects\iTunesDLL.vcxproj" (target "_BuildLinkAction" depends on it):
15>Done building target "_Link" in project "iTunesDLL.vcxproj".: (TargetId:212)

What is the latest version of Java/JRE that Is compatible with AMD64 bit Wi

New to the AMD64 bit windows platform. What is the latest version of JRE that is compatible with AMD64 bit windows 2003 Enterprise edition and Standard Edition Server and where can I download it.

Check out JCK 6u1 at:
http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp

Is RoboHelp compatible with 64-bit Windows 7?

I'm having a problem with RoboHelp/RoboSource (posted about elsewhere in the forum) and in response to a support query, I received a message stating that RoboHelp is not compatible with 64-bit Windows 7.
Quoting: "Please ensure that Windows 7 is not 64 bit, as RoboHelp is not compatible."
This seems to be in conflict with the blog posting by Ankur Jain, Product Manager - RoboHelp, (http://blogs.adobe.com/techcomm/2009/12/adobe_robohelp_8_now_supports_windows_7_also.html) in which he states "I'm pleased to inform you that Adobe RoboHelp 8 now also supports Windows 7. With this, RoboHelp 8 is now compatible with Microsoft® Windows® XP with Service Pack 2 (Service Pack 3 recommended) or Windows Vista® with Service Pack 1 or Windows® 7."
Now, Mr. Jain doesn't specify 32-bit or 64-bit Windows 7, but considering the detail in his posting regarding service packs, I'd expect that a blanket statement like RH is compatible with Win 7 would mean both 32-bit and 64-bit, unless otherwise stated.
Some questions:
1) Is RH compatible with 64-bit Win 7 or not?
2) What about RoboSource? Is it compatible with Windows 7? If so, which versions? 32-bit or 64-bit?
Also, the tech person said that we also need to try running RoboHelp in "simplified mode." What exactly is that?
Thank you in advance!

Hi again
I'm wondering if the "Simplified" bit is stemming from this Adobe Knowledge Base article?
Click here to view
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 within the day - $24.95!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcerStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

PSE 9 - is it compatible with 64-bit Windows 7?

Hi everybody
Have spent hours trying to find an answer to this, but without success: - are Photoshop Elements 9 and Premiere Elements 9 (as sold in the UK) compatible with the 64-bit version of Windows 7? I hope they are, because I know my old PSE 3 and Premiere 1 are not. And my new Windows 7 64-bit PC should be delivered within the next week.
Thanks in advance for your help.

Thank you for the suggestion, but I happened to speak with an Adobe support person and he was unsure about the success with PSE 9. I also did some further searching and found Microsoft DO NOT recommend the installation of Office 2010 64 bit! I wish they had put this on their installation message. The blog from Microsoft further mentioned there is no performance increase of Office 64 over 32. So I bit the bullet, uninstalled Office 2010 64 and installed the 32 bit version. Well PSE 8 that I have works like before. Obviously the problem is compatibility, so anyone even thinking of installing the 64 bit version of Office, stay away from it. In passing I had the same problem with Quickbooks Pro 2010 as I had with PSE 8 which disappeared when I went of Office 32.
I would hope that Adobe is looking into the 64 bit version which would be compatible with Office. Not really knowing how it works, it would seem that PSE X would run better if it had access to more than 4 GB of memory.

NI-RIO 4.0 not compatible with 64-bit LabVIEW?

Hi,
I have a 7841R multifunction RIO card. I'm currently installing the evaluation version of LabVIEW to test it out. I've got 64-bit LabVIEW successfully installed and I had installed NI-RIO 3.6 (which was on the disk that came with the card). In the process of installing other features (I believe the C interface for FPGA or something) I discovered that I needed NI-RIO 4.0. I uninstalled NI-RIO 3.6, downloaded NI-RIO 4.0 and now I'm attempting to install it. I get the following message a few steps into the process:
Important note about NI-RIO support for LabVIEW (64-bit Versions)
A 64-bit version of LabVIEW was detected on your system. This version of the NI-RIO driver does not support 64-bit versions of LabVIEW. However, this version of NI-RIO is fully compatible with 32-bit versions of LabVIEW installed on 64-bit operating systems.
Is there a version of NI-RIO 4.0 that supports 64-bit versions of LabVIEW? If so, could you point me to it?
Or should I install the 32-bit version of LabVIEW?
Thanks for the help!
Cheers,
tom
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hey Tom,
Unfortunately we do not have a RIO driver that is compatible with our 64-bit LabVIEW Development software. If you need to use the RIO driver, you should install the 32-bit version of LabVIEW and build your applications in that development system. Sorry for the confusion initially during the installation process!
Ben N.
Applications Engineering
Certified LabVIEW Developer

How can I download an older version of i tunes compatible with my i book G4 on os x 10.4 ?

how can I download an older version of i tunes compatible with my i book G4 on os x 10.4 ?

Thks Niel. Any idea about the following issue ?
Dowload i tunes according to the link you sent went well, I did recover my i tunes.
But now i photo identified my device i phone 4s but i tunes doesn't, what can I do ?
Marcodk

Would pages '09 version 5.1 be compatible with Mac OS 10.7.5?

Some pages files I got require Pages 5.1, but my Mac Pro could not be upgraded to Mavericks, so I am stuck with Mac OS 10.7.5. Would pages '09 version 5.1 be compatible with Mac OS 10.7.5?

Pages 09 isn't 5.1. It is 4.x. Pages 09 works on your Mac but Pages 5.x doesn't. You are better off using Pages 09 as it has about 100 more features than PAges 5 has!!!

Is there a version of Firefox mobile compatible with Samsung galaxy precedent mobile phone?

Looking for a version of Firefox mobile compatible with Samsung galaxy precedent

What OS do you have?
Unfortunately the Firefox App is not working properly with 2.1 systems. Here are the bugs to follow their statuses: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?order=Importance;list_id=2400841;short_desc=2.1;query_format=advanced;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr;product=Fennec;product=Fennec%20Native

"Error code 0xc000035a Attempting to load a 64-bit application, however this cpu is not compatible with 64-bit mode" when I load Windows 7 [64bit] on an older iMac(with Parallels 6)? Any solutions that don't mean buying a new iMac?

"Error code 0xc000035a Attempting to load a 64-bit application, however this cpu is not compatible with 64-bit mode"
when I load Windows 7 [64bit] on an older iMac(with Parallels 6)? Any solutions that don't mean buying a new iMac?

You should probably post your question on the Parallels forums: http://forums.parallels.com

What version of illustrator is compatible with MAC OS X 10.68

Hello,
I would know what version of illustrator is compatible with MAC OS X 10.68.
I use a MAC BOOK, with this computer I don't use OS X Mavericks !
Thanks.
Bye Bye.

bluejul,
You can see which versions are compatible here:
http://helpx.adobe.com/illustrator/system-requirements.html

Which versions of Illiustrator are compatible with InDesign CS 5.5?

which versions of Illiustrator are compatible with InDesign CS 5.5?

Thank you for your reply Peter. I have InDesign CS 5.5 and need to use Illustrator with it to update the data in graphs. I know CS5.1 works, and am wondering if earlier versions (back to CS or Illustrator 10) would work as well to edit and re-save my graphs for use in the InDesign document. Ultimately I need to incorporate the updated graphs in my document using InDesign 5.5, so that’s the compatibility I want to understand.

What are versions of Internet Explorer compatible with Dreamweaver CS5.5 ?

What are versions of Internet Explorer compatible with Dreamweaver CS5.5 ?

Hello,
just to be safe you should test or validate your website there for example:
http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage and
CSS - http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
HTML - http://validator.w3.org/
JavaScript - http://www.jslint.com/
PHP - http://phpcodechecker.com/
Hans-Günter

What version of FCEx is compatible with early 2008 mac book W/ 10.6.8

I need to find out what version of FCEx
is compatible with a early 2008 mac book.
Processor : 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
OS version 10.6.8
I know Apple has dropped FC support
but I'm looking on line for a copy
but need to know what version I need to be looking for

Niel,
Thank you, I just located a copy FCEx 3.5 & 4.0 closed box for next to nothing
so then all should work.
thanks
Ray

What version of iDVD is compatible with OS X 10.5.8? I get an error message that iDVD 5.0.1 is not compatible with OS X 10.5.8.

What version of iDVD is compatible with OS X 10.5.8? I get an error message that iDVD 5.0.1 is not compatible with OS X 10.5.8.

It won't mess up anything. The preference file contains the preferences you set in iDVD such as this:
Follow this to delete the iDVD preference file:
1 - delete the IDVD preference file, com.apple.iDVD.plist, that resides in your
User/Home()/Library/ Preferences folder.
2 - delete IDVD'S cache file, Cache.db, that is located in your
User/Home()/Library/Caches/com.apple.iDVD folder.
Click to view full size

Version of jvm.dll compatible with 64-bit development on Visual Studio 2013?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for