VERY VERY slow performance!!! HELP, DW 8

I have a brand new MacBook Pro running Dreamweaver 8.0, just
downloaded last week. I am in the middle of a big project adding
basic content to a new site. EVERYTHING I do takes a VERY long time
to complete. For instance, i can be waiting several minutes to
change a text, one word, to Bold; this happens in both of the spilt
windows, code and design screens.
I have seen nothing stating that this product is not Macintel
happy, is this the case? How can anyone get anything done? To work
around I have installed DW 8.0 in my windows within Parallels, but
it is very messy as PS is in the Mac OS... my preferred FTP is in
the Mac OS, etc.
Any thoughts would be hugely appreciated! Thanks!

Radmacdaddy,
Are you sure that you have latest version of DW8 version
8.0.2 instead of 8.0? If not, be sure to download the latest
version to bring your DW8 to current.
quote:
Originally posted by:
Radmacdaddy
I have a brand new MacBook Pro running Dreamweaver 8.0, just
downloaded last week. I am in the middle of a big project adding
basic content to a new site. EVERYTHING I do takes a VERY long time
to complete. For instance, i can be waiting several minutes to
change a text, one word, to Bold; this happens in both of the spilt
windows, code and design screens.
I have seen nothing stating that this product is not Macintel
happy, is this the case? How can anyone get anything done? To work
around I have installed DW 8.0 in my windows within Parallels, but
it is very messy as PS is in the Mac OS... my preferred FTP is in
the Mac OS, etc.
Any thoughts would be hugely appreciated! Thanks!

Similar Messages

  • Formatted Search with DI  leads to a very slow performance - HELP....

    Hello There
    I have defined some formatted search in OPCH - everything is working fine.
    I have added some logic to this form via the DI.(handlling 1 item press_event), and I get a very very slow performance - the ADDON-EXE jumps TO 230MEGA of memory, and entering values to each row in the tables/item in the form takes about 15 seconds.
    Any suggestions?
    RGDS
    HAGAI

    Hi Hagai,
    Normally an addon written using the DI would take up 60-80MBs.
    Are you filtering out all events except for the item press event for the form? If you are not filtering events then this can have quite a drastic affect on performance.
    What logic have you got behind the press event? If the addon exe is ballooning out to 230MB then it suggests that there is either a problem with a memory leak or that an error is occuring in the code. I would recommend putting try/catch clauses at suitable places in the code and maybe specifically setting objects to null and calling the .NET garbage collector to try and minimise the potential for memory leaks.
    Are you sure that it is the combination of the formatted search and the addon that is causing the problem, i.e. if you take away the formatted search but leave the addon do you still get poor performance or does everything speed up?
    Hope this helps,
    Owen

  • MD5 and RSA - Slow performance  - Help / Views Required

    Hi,
    I am facing a problem while signing a message.The
    scenario is:
    I have to create 20,000 messages to be sent to
    clients. I am encrypting the message using MD5 and
    RSA.
    But when i am encrypting via RSA it takes about 20
    mins to encrypt the 20k messages.I dont know why its
    taking so much time. I have max 4-5 mins to manipulate
    and send messages. The sample code is as follows:
    ur earliest help will be quite helpful.
    Thanks in advance
    Hassan
    ************** Source Code ****************
    import java.io.IOException;
    import java.math.BigInteger;
    import java.security.KeyFactory;
    import java.security.MessageDigest;
    import java.security.Signature;
    import java.security.PrivateKey;
    import java.security.spec.RSAPrivateKeySpec;
    import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
    public class Signer {
    ******************************************

    Hi Sabre,
    I have compiled the simple code from JCE tutorial for DES. The output text it is showing is different than input text.
    Is there any problem going on in tutorial's example ?
    Regards
    Hamid
    ******** output **************
    the original cleartext is: [B@13a328f
    the encrypted text is: [B@337838
    the final cleartext is: [B@119cca4
    ******** Code ************
    public class jCypher {
    private static Cipher desCipher = null;
    public static void main (String[] args) throws NoSuchAlgorithmException,
    InvalidKeyException, IllegalBlockSizeException, NoSuchProviderException,
    BadPaddingException, NoSuchPaddingException, Exception
    //Creating a Key Generator and Generating a Key
    //public static KeyGenerator getInstance(String algorithm);
    KeyGenerator keygen = KeyGenerator.getInstance("DES");
    SecretKey desKey = keygen.generateKey();
    // Creating a Cipher
    // Cipher.getInstance(Transformation);     
    // c1 = Cipher.getInstance("RSA/ECB/PKCS1Padding");     
    desCipher = Cipher.getInstance("DES/ECB/PKCS5Padding");
    // Cipher.init(int opmode, Key key);
    desCipher.init(Cipher.ENCRYPT_MODE, desKey );
    // Cleartext
    byte[] cleartext = "This is small Text for testing".getBytes();
    System.out.println("the original cleartext is: " + cleartext.toString());
    // Encrypt the cleartext
    // encrypted or decrypted data in one step (single-part operation)
    // public byte[] doFinal(byte[] input);
    byte[] ciphertext = desCipher.doFinal(cleartext);
    System.out.println("the encrypted text is: " + ciphertext.toString());
    // Initialize the same cipher for decryption
    desCipher.init(Cipher.DECRYPT_MODE, desKey );
    // Decrypt the ciphertext
    byte[] cleartext1 = desCipher.doFinal(ciphertext);
    System.out.println("the final cleartext is: " + cleartext1.toString());
    } // End main()
    }

  • The query is performing very very slow, can any one please help me tue this

    SELECT h.ROWID row_id, e.preparer_user_id
    FROM arsarc.ars_sv_reconciliation e,
    arsarc.ars_sv_reconciliation_accts a,
    arsarc.ars_sv_acct_status_history h
    WHERE e.rec_id = :b1
    AND e.rec_id = a.rec_id
    AND e.ledger_id = h.ledger_id
    AND a.ccid = h.ccid
    AND e.preparer_user_id <> h.preparer_user_id
    AND h.fiscal_year + h.fiscal_period >= e.fiscal_year + e.fiscal_period
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 2851427911
    | Id  | Operation                     | Name                           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT              |                                |    60 |  7740 |  6282  (11)| 00:00:08 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN                    |                                |    60 |  7740 |  6282  (11)| 00:00:08 |
    |*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN            | PK_RECONCILIATION_ACCTS        |   104 |  4160 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   3 |   NESTED LOOPS                |                                |   178K|    15M|  6243  (10)| 00:00:08 |
    |   4 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ARS_SV_RECONCILIATION          |     1 |    23 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  5 |     INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | PK_ARS_SV_RECONCILIATION       |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    |*  6 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ARS_SV_ACCT_STATUS_HISTORY     |   178K|    11M|  6241  (10)| 00:00:08 |
    |*  7 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN          | ARS_SV_ACCT_STATUS_HISTORY$LPY | 62094 |       |  5243  (11)| 00:00:07 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       1 - access("A"."CCID"="H"."CCID")
       2 - access("A"."REC_ID"=TO_NUMBER(:B1))
       5 - access("E"."REC_ID"=TO_NUMBER(:B1))
       6 - filter("E"."PREPARER_USER_ID"<>"H"."PREPARER_USER_ID")
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
       7 - access("E"."LEDGER_ID"="H"."LEDGER_ID")
           filter("H"."FISCAL_YEAR"+"H"."FISCAL_PERIOD">="E"."FISCAL_YEAR"+"E"."FISCAL_PERIOD")

    Hi,
    the plan isn't showing any problem (the cost isn't high) so it's not possible to use it to troublehshoot the query. Please provide more information: 4-digit Oracle version, and depending on the version, either SQL real-time monitor report or dbms_xplan output with rowsource stats (option "iostats last" after running your sql with ALTER SESSION SET STATISTICS_LEVEL = ALL).
    Also, when reporting a performance problem it would be wise to avoid expressions like "very, very slow" replacing them with something more useful like "my query is taking 2.5 hours to retrieve 30k rows".
    Best regards,
    Nikolay

  • Acrobat very Slow performance (50% CPU usage)

    My acrobat 9 PRO (9.3.2) has suddently started to use 50% of my CPU usage everytime a *.pdf document is opened.
    It is the task Acrobat.exe which is the problem. This results in VERY slow performance and I cannot use the review function without adobe is crashing!
    This has not always been a problem!
    Does anyone know why this is happening?
    I have tried to uninstall and reinstall acrobat, without any luck!
    Thanks
    Peder

    You probably have the same problem as I do. I use version 9.3.3 on a fairly powerful machine with Windows vista. In my case, the problem is related to the weblink.api (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/675941?tstart=0). I also uninstalled, reinstalled, repaired - nothing helps.

  • Lion: very slow performance of my macbook pro

    very slow performance.
    went to terminal, did the top command, and got following results (mind you, ONLY have Safari and of course Terminal open):
    Processes: 96 total, 4 running, 9 stuck, 83 sleeping, 419 threads      19:07:17
    Load Avg: 1.99, 1.81, 1.59  CPU usage: 2.36% user, 5.21% sys, 92.41% idle
    SharedLibs: 1660K resident, 0B data, 0B linkedit.
    MemRegions: 15947 total, 2662M resident, 47M private, 209M shared.
    PhysMem: 695M wired, 2175M active, 1083M inactive, 3953M used, 13M free.
    VM: 250G vsize, 1093M framework vsize, 699065(68) pageins, 1724738(881) pageouts
    Networks: packets: 70104/55M in, 66648/10M out.
    Disks: 966630/9347M read, 327765/18G written.
    PID   COMMAND      %CPU  TIME     #TH  #WQ  #POR #MREG RPRVT  RSHRD  RSIZE
    4058  top          5.2   00:03.32 1/1  0    28   29    912K   216K   1620K
    4055  bash         0.0   00:00.02 1    0    20   23    356K   216K   1112K
    4052  CVMCompiler  0.0   00:00.30 1    0    30   69    7780K  220K   16M
    4051  login        0.0   00:00.08 2    1    33   63    928K   216K   2184K
    4049  Terminal     0.3   00:01.34 7    3    128+ 164+  7580K+ 13M    15M+
    4042  ocspd        0.0   00:00.02 1    0    26   33    420K+  276K   1376K+
    4041  WebProcess   0.0   00:04.35 7    3    119  201   16M-   10M    26M-
    4039  Safari       1.1   00:09.44 12   3    193  413   47M-   20M    81M-
    3958  spindump_age 0.0   00:00.02 2    2    38   55    356K   220K   1100K
    3956  spindump     1.3   00:42.93 16/1 13   228  145   46M+   15M    53M+
    3953  aosnotifyd   0.0   00:00.18 3    1    53   279   2064K  3532K  6156K
    3939  AddressBookM 6.8   06:59.11 4    1    68   4067+ 2131M- 3308K  1554M-
    3895  lsboxd       0.0   00:00.06 2    2    49   69    1156K  6820K  3292K
    3031  cookied      0.0   00:01.36 2    1    42   82    2028K  268K   3
    every minute or so the computer blocks, every 3 or 4 hours I have to restart etc.
    any suggestions?

    ok, stopped syncing in System preferences and even (horror) deleted the file which reappeared in seconds.
    now waiting to see if stopping the syncing helps - though computer is now working a bit better, the info on Activity Monitor would indicate it is not a real improvement
    473           AddressBookMobileMeSharingAgent          me          1,4          4          1.020,0 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    312           helpd          me          0,4          65          358,9 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    0           kernel_task          root          1,1          76          336,6 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    459           Mail          me          0,4          9          276,2 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    194           java          root          0,1          30          162,4 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    405           Safari          me          0,5          12          120,0 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    407           Safari Web Content          me          0,2          7          100,3 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    195           WindowServer          _windowserver          0,5          7          64,4 MB          Intel (64 bit)

  • Very very slow broadband , someone please help

    Hi have come here as a last resort , i have been a bt internet/broadband user for over 10 years have had broadband for a long time , we often in our house have me playing games online on the pc , the kids have the xbox 360 and the mrs will have the ipad all hooked up at the same time with no problems ,
    then friday the broadband dropped and we had a orange flashing light ,
    it came back on about 5 mins later and ever since it is very very slow , i have tryed resteing and rebooting the router , it connects to the internet just fine but everything is running ar a snails pace , tryed calling them which is a nightmare trying to explaine to a call center guy , they told me to hang up for a line test and they would call me back and havnt bothered
    i have done the line test online it it comes back as ok , we have noticed some nose on the phone line from today
    can anyone please give me some advice?
    here is btspeed check results:
    FAQ
    <script type="text/javascript"></script> Test1 comprises of Best Effort Test: -provides background information.
    Download  Speed
    80 Kbps
    0 Kbps
    250 Kbps
    Max Achievable Speed
     Download speedachieved during the test was - 80 Kbps
     For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 50-250 Kbps.
     Additional Information:
     Your DSL Connection Rate :160 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 448 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
     IP Profile for your line is - 135 Kbps
    If you wish to discuss these results please contact your ISP.
    If you are experiencing problems with specific applications, servers or websites please contact your ISP for assistance.
    Your test has completed please close this window to exit the performance tester.
    Please visit FAQ section if you are unable To understand the test results.
    http://speedtest.net/result/1379380863.png

    have phoned them 4 times now (2 times on 151) and they ensure me they have tested the line and i have no fault , they set up remote asstent and the guy did a soft restart of my hub which seemed to work , he then tryed to get me a better d/l speed but it whet back to a poor one again , so he again did a soft restart and i now get this:
    ADSL line status
    Connection Information
    Line state
    Connected <script type="text/javascript"></script>
    Connection time
    0 days, 00:40:50
    Downstream
    352 Kbps
    Upstream
    448 Kbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI
    0/38
    Type
    PPPoA
    Modulation
    G.992.1 Annex A
    Latency type
    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up)
    11.4 dB / 21.0 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up)
    21.4 dB / 12.0 dB
    Output power (Down/Up)
    1.0 dBm / 1.5 dBm
    the downstream and upstream numbers are both better but it has made no differnace, every page i go to takes ages to load (if they load at all) and the ipad wont load at all , this is now getting silly i have wasted around 6 hrs of my time tonight trying to fix this and now just feel like canceling and ordering from eleswhere as i know the messing i will have to go through in the morning to explaine this from the start to a new call center worker all over again
    i was led to belive that bt staff would help me if i posted here hence why i did so but even this is looking like a total waste of my time , (no dissrepect to you imjolly for your help)

  • Very slow performance, need assistance

    I have a program that has very slow performance (and I mean SLOW).  I was hoping somebody could tell me how to improve the performance.  I know where it hangs up (at LOOP AT it_detail INTO wa_detail.) but I'm not sure what I need to do to make it quicker.  Any help would be appreciated.
    TABLES: vbak,
            vbpa,
            adrc.
    TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_detail,
             vbeln TYPE vbak-vbeln,
             erdat TYPE vbak-erdat,
             vdatu TYPE vbak-vdatu,
             adrnr TYPE vbpa-adrnr,
             sa_name TYPE adrc-name1,
             sa_street TYPE adrc-street,
             sa_city TYPE adrc-city1,
             sa_state TYPE adrc-region,
             sa_zip TYPE adrc-post_code1,
             sa_tel TYPE adrc-tel_number,
             kunnr TYPE vbpa-kunnr,
             ag_name TYPE kna1-name1,
             ag_street TYPE kna1-stras,
             ag_city TYPE kna1-ort01,
             ag_state TYPE kna1-regio,
             ag_zip TYPE kna1-pstlz,
             ag_tel TYPE kna1-telf1,
             vkbur TYPE knvv-vkbur,
             we_num TYPE likp-kunnr,
             we_name TYPE kna1-name1,
             we_name2 TYPE kna1-name2,
             we_street TYPE kna1-stras,
             we_city TYPE kna1-ort01,
             we_state TYPE kna1-regio,
             we_zip TYPE kna1-pstlz,
             we_tel TYPE kna1-telf1,
           END OF ty_detail.
    DATA: it_detail TYPE TABLE OF ty_detail WITH KEY vbeln adrnr kunnr we_num,
          wa_detail LIKE LINE OF it_detail.
    DATA: addressnum TYPE vbpa-adrnr,
          temp_kunnr TYPE likp-kunnr.
    * S E L E C T I O N - S C R E E N
    SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK required WITH FRAME TITLE text-002.
    SELECT-OPTIONS:  s_vdatu FOR vbak-vdatu OBLIGATORY.    "Req delivery date
    SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK required.
    SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK temp WITH FRAME TITLE text-001.
    SELECT-OPTIONS:  s_auart FOR vbak-auart OBLIGATORY.
    PARAMETER:  p_parfun TYPE vbpa-parvw DEFAULT 'Z5' OBLIGATORY.
    SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK temp.
    *INITIALIZATION.
    *  REFRESH s_auart.
    *  CLEAR s_auart.
    *  s_auart-sign = 'I'.
    *  s_auart-option = 'EQ'.
    *  s_auart-low = 'OR'.
    *  APPEND s_auart.
    *  s_auart-low = 'ZDT'.
    *  APPEND s_auart.
    * END OF SELECTION SCREEN
    * M A I N - B O D Y
    *Main select statement.
    SELECT a~vbeln a~erdat a~vdatu c~adrnr c~kunnr
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_detail
        FROM vbak AS a
          INNER JOIN vbap AS b
              ON b~vbeln = a~vbeln
          INNER JOIN vbpa AS c
              ON c~vbeln = b~vbeln
    *          AND c~posnr = b~posnr
                   WHERE a~auart IN s_auart
                   AND a~vdatu IN s_vdatu
                   AND c~parvw = p_parfun.
    LOOP AT it_detail INTO wa_detail.
      SELECT SINGLE name1 street city1 region post_code1 tel_number
          FROM adrc INTO (wa_detail-sa_name, wa_detail-sa_street, wa_detail-sa_city, wa_detail-sa_state,
                            wa_detail-sa_zip, wa_detail-sa_tel)
          WHERE addrnumber = wa_detail-adrnr.
      SELECT SINGLE name1 stras ort01 regio pstlz telf1
          FROM kna1 INTO (wa_detail-ag_name, wa_detail-ag_street, wa_detail-ag_city, wa_detail-ag_state,
                            wa_detail-ag_zip, wa_detail-ag_tel)
          WHERE kunnr = wa_detail-kunnr.
      SELECT SINGLE c~kunnr INTO temp_kunnr
          FROM vbpa AS a
              INNER JOIN lips AS b
                ON b~vgbel = a~vbeln
              INNER JOIN likp AS c
                ON c~vbeln = b~vbeln
                WHERE a~vbeln = wa_detail-vbeln.
      wa_detail-we_num = temp_kunnr.
      SELECT SINGLE name1 name2 stras ort01 regio pstlz telf1
          FROM kna1 INTO (wa_detail-we_name, wa_detail-we_name2, wa_detail-we_street, wa_detail-we_city, wa_detail-we_state,
                            wa_detail-we_zip, wa_detail-we_tel)
          WHERE kunnr = wa_detail-we_num.
      SELECT SINGLE vkbur FROM knvv INTO wa_detail-vkbur
          WHERE kunnr = wa_detail-kunnr.
      MODIFY it_detail FROM wa_detail.
    ENDLOOP.
    PERFORM display.
    INCLUDE zpartner_displayf01.
    Regards,
    Davis

    Hi Davis,
      The culprit is the select inside the loop.
    YOu should use for all entries instead .
    I will show for one select, you do similar thing for others:
      SELECT addrnumber name1 street city1 region post_code1 tel_number
          FROM adrc INTO table itab_adrc
    for all entries in it_detail
          WHERE addrnumber = it_detail-adrnr.
    sort itab-adrc by addrnumber.
    LOOP AT it_detail INTO wa_detail.
    read table it_adrc with key addrnumber = wa_detail-adrnr.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
    move fiedls of it_adrc into wa_detail.
    endif.
    ENDLOOP.

  • Cisco RV 120W VERY slow performance and being unreachable

    Hello!
    I have strange issues with my RV 120W, which I bought after the recommendations from a Cisco/Linksys pre-sales support. I'm using this unit for SOHO environment with two clients (computers) connected and a few mobile clients. Nothing special and nothing complex. I replaced my WRT610N router with this one on behalf of the VPN features, the RV 120W offers.
    Before initial setup I upgraded firmware to it's latest (1.0.1.3).
    The issues I'm having with this thing are:
    - very slow WLAN performance. And I mean - very, very slow. After doing some analysis I'm having a drop from 10Mbit/s to a stable speed of only a few houndrets of kilos per second. Even less. An average, constant speed test show no more than 50-80 kB/s. And I have a 20/20Mbit link.
    - very slow WAN - LAN performance. Although not as slow as WLAN, even LAN is somehow slow with an average throughput from WAN to LAN show no more than 15Mbit/s.
    - WAN IP address - host cannot be reached. After setting up the router to be able to echo the PING and be remotely managed, I can achive both services JUST for about 20 seconds after the unit reboots. After those 20 seconds, remote management sessions are timed out and the host is unreachable. But If I reboot the router again, I get it to work again - for no more than 20 seconds.
    As this is my first (more) professional router, I'm not really sure if I've got my VPN setup correctly. I cannot get it my VPN to work either and I can't tell if these issues are related.
    Any help would be appriciated.
    Thanks

    Hey Juka,
    Sorry your having issues with the rv120w.
    I seen that you upgraded the firmware on the rv120w when you got it.  I always do a factory reset of the device when upgrading the firmware.  I will first backup my configs, factory reset the device, then reload the configs. 
    Try that since you did do a firmware upgrade to see if the device speeds up for you.
    The wireless issues you were describing, I would do a wireless scan using a wireless analysis software like INSSIDER or something like it, that way you can see the wireless channels that are being used and set your router manually to a channel that has no or the least congestion.
    Try this and let us know what you get.

  • AIR application performance is very bad(slow)

    I have an AIR application developed using Flash CS3. The
    issue is application performance is very bad(slow) when the OS
    (Windows XP) display property setting is in 16 bit color mode. When
    the display property setting is changed to 32 bit color mode
    applications performance is good and faster.
    Application has used lots of color gradients, tween
    animations.
    System Configuration:
    Windows XP (SP2)
    1 GB RAM
    INTEL P4 , 1.5 GHz Processor Speed.
    Can any one explain that is there any issue with Flash Player
    or AIR runtime.

    quote:
    Originally posted by:
    cyberKafka
    I also understand that creating windows via AS (not MXML)
    could help a bit (apparently a lot with memory allocation. have not
    tested myself thou.)
    Do you have a link for any more info on this? Sounds
    interesting.

  • Very slow performance AMD athlon processor

    Hi,
    I'm working on Windows 2000 environment with an AMD athlon +3000 processor, and 1.5GB RAM.
    I just installed VMware 5.0 and Linux AS 3. As soon as I rebooted the virtual machine and after having installed Linux, the guest OS (Linux) performance is very very poor.
    Do you have any suggestion about how to solve this issue?
    Thanks
    Gilson Sirvas

    Where does the Oracle software come into the picture? If this is a generic vmware issue please post on VMware's community forums..
    http://www.vmware.com/community/
    that will be much more effective.
    In general defragmenting the HD is very helpful, also allocating more memory to the Guest OS will make things run faster. look in the vmware.log make sure IO is not taking too long, look for things like:
    Jun 12 04:24:11: vmx| SCSI0:0: Command WRITE(10) took 7.347 seconds (ok)
    that means that a single IO took 7 seconds, that's very very slow.. move the VM to a faster (internal) HD.. Finally check with vmware, there might be an issue with the AMD processor, not sure...
    If you figure it out and the solution is interesting, please take the time and post here so that others can benefit.
    good luck,
    Saar.

  • Just updated PS CS 5 and it is very very slow... HELP!

    One week ago, I have updated from PS CS3 to CS5. I am liking CS5, but is very very slow at everything. I am running Bridge and PS and that is it. Can anyone help me?
    Thanks.

    My CS 5 is slow, also. I've upgraded from CS3 on my iMac G5; running 10.5.8. (2GB RAM). I use Illustrator, Photoshop, and InDesign and all three are slow and sluggish. Very slow to open and kinda slow to perform tasks. In PS, my files range from smaller images to quite large images. I did install the 12.0.1 update and it doesn't seem to have changed this much. I don't use Font Agent or Third Party Plugins. Any additional suggestions? Thanks.

  • IPhone turning off during Phone Call with iOS 4 and very slow performance!!

    Ever since the update, my phone has been switching itself off during a conversation.
    Has any one else experienced this problem since the update???
    Do you have a solution, if so please post it and help me!!!
    Also, the phone has been going very slow.
    Keyboard appearing 20 seconds later, after opening a new note and overall slow performance.

    Thread here :
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2471090&tstart=15

  • Slow Performance or XDP File size very large

    There have been a few reports of people having slow performance in their forms (tyically for Dynamic forms) or file sizes of XDP files being very large.
    These are the symptoms of a problem with cut and paste in Designer where a Process Instruction (PI) used to control how Designer displays a specific palette is repeated many many times. If you look in your XDP source and see this line repeated more than once then you have the issue:
    The problem has been resolved by applying a style sheet to the XDP and removing the instruction (until now). A patch has been released that will fix the cut and paste issue as well as repair your templates when you open them in a designer with the patch applied.
    Here is a blog entry that describes the patch as well as where to get it.
    http://blogs.adobe.com/livecycle/2009/03/post.html

    My XDP file grow up to 145mb before i decided to see what was actually happening.
    It appears that the LvieCycle Designer ES program sometimes writes alot of redundant data... the same line millions of times over & over again.
    I wrote this small java program which reduced the size up to 111KB !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (wow what a bug that must have been!!!)
    Here's the sourcecode:
    import java.io.BufferedReader;
    import java.io.BufferedWriter;
    import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
    import java.io.FileReader;
    import java.io.FileWriter;
    import java.io.IOException;
    public class MakeSmaller {
    private static final String DELETE_STRING = "                           <?templateDesigner StyleID aped3?>";
    public static void main(String... args) {
      BufferedReader br = null;
      BufferedWriter bw = null;
      try {
       br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(args[0]));
       bw = new BufferedWriter(new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter(args[0] + ".small")));
       String line = null;
       boolean firstOccurence = true;
       while((line = br.readLine()) != null) {
        if (line.equals(DELETE_STRING)) {
         if (firstOccurence) {
          bw.write(line + "\n");
          firstOccurence = false;
        } else {
         bw.write(line + "\n");
         firstOccurence = true;
      } catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
       e.printStackTrace();
      } catch (IOException e) {
       e.printStackTrace();
      } finally {
       if (br != null) {
        try {
         br.close();
        } catch (IOException e) {
         e.printStackTrace();
       if (bw != null) {
        try {
         bw.close();
        } catch (IOException e) {
         e.printStackTrace();
    File that gets generated is the same as the xdp file (same location) but gets the extension .small. Just in case something goes wrong the original file is NOT modified as you can see in the source code. And yes Designer REALLY wrote that line like a gazillion times in the .xdp file (shame on the programmers!!)
    You can also see that i also write the first occurrence to the small file just in case its needed...

  • Fonction HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION very slow performance in bacth job

    Hi all experts!
    Does any one having a problem with slow performance while using the fonction HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION and running in batch mode for a big population of data ?
    I have tried to use          
        nocommit         = 'X' as parameter in the fonction HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION
    and calling after each update.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
          EXPORTING
            wait = 'X'.
    And the performance is very long.
    I also remarque that if we run for a small population like less than 500 employees then it finish within 20 mins. But If I ran for a polulation of 5000 employees then it take more than 6 hours = 3600 mins. ?
    Thanks for your answer.
    Hugo Nguyen

    Call Function module 'HR_PSBUFFER_INITIALIZE' After each call to HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION.
    Refer [link|http://brookshireconsulting.com/technical_update.html] for more information.
    I have tried it my own and it do improve the performance,.
    Hope this improves the performace for you as well.
    Regards
    Shital

  • Very, very slow performance

    Lightroom's performance on my computer has become, at times, intolerably slow.  After rebooting my iMac and not opening any other programs or browsers, it just took about eight minutes to import 23 files, and a few more minutes to build 1:1 previews.  When things are running fine this might take one minute.  (I always build 1:1 previews on import and this happens with recently imported files as well as older ones, so it's not a question of having to build previews on the fly.)  I've had extremely slow performance ("Loading") just moving from one photo to another in the Library and Develop modules or moving from one module to another, typically up to about 90 seconds, or when LR is "preparing the file" for export or edit in PS.  But not always -- sometimes it's quite zippy -- and there's no pattern that I can see.  Generally when this is occurring, memory "pressure" and CPU usage are normal, but it happens when usage is minimal as well.  Occasionally there is a spinning beach ball but not usually. 
    My catalog has about 30k photos and very few presets of any kind.  Probably 75% of these files have never been edited at all.  I don't make hundreds of local adjustment, rarely more than ten in one image.  I have about 40 Smart Collections with an average of several hundred images each.  I rarely use Smart Previews.  I optimize and back up the catalog every time I exit LR, which is a few times a week.  My file/folder structure is simple and clean:  /Pictures/year/day.
    I'm running LR 5.4 on a mid-2011 iMac, 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7, with 16GB of memory.  I have the Lightroom catalog and previews on the main drive, which is a 250GB SSD with about 100GB free.  (Problem happened when my catalog was on different internal drive, too.)  My pictures folder is on an internal drive with over 100GB available.  I have the maximum cache size set to 50GB.  I'm running Mavericks but it was just as slow under Mountain Lion.  It was just as slow in earlier versions of Lightroom, major and minor.  Other programs/apps run just fine on my computer, including Photoshop.  (Generally, LR's performance is the same whether or not PS is running.)  The only performance issue I've noticed since switching to Mavericks is that Finder stalls for several seconds every once in a while.
    I've seen this Lightroom problem referred to on various forums, including Adobe forums, for a long time now -- years -- and I've never seen a definitive fix.  I think I've answered all of the questions that are usually asked.  Is there any solution to this?  I use LR 30-40 hours per week.  I'm tearing my hair out and the option of moving to another program would be the very last resort, but I might have to do that. 

    I don't use your same workflow, and I assume you're shooting RAW. However,  after I have built 1:1 previews in LR (which takes a LONG time), when I click on a file to decide if it's sharp or not, it still takes 5-10 seconds for each file to load. And my computer isn't slow, and I have the same issue on my laptop, which is new and fast. I haven't seen a satisfactory answer to this problem, nor much acknowledgement from Adobe. My files are from a Nikon D7100 with 24 megapixels, so the file size is likely a factor.
    If you are shooting the type of subjects where you use 1:1 previews primarily to determine sharpness, you could consider Photo Mechanic (unfortunately it costs $150) as the first step in your workflow. It uses the embedded jpg files in the RAW file, so it loads 1:1 jpg previews almost instantly. Sports and nature photographers use this product all the time, mostly to delete losers.

Maybe you are looking for