Video/Photo Editing on the Mac Mini (question mark?)

I recently discovered the Mac Mini and immediatly thought "what a great thing, a cheeper version of a mac that i can use to edit things like video and potentialy pictures!"
However, it has been brought to my attention that the mini might not be the most powerful machine and potentialy incapable of handeling video/photo editing due to a less powerful graphics card.
My question pretty much is, can I effectivly edit on a mac mini or is there a way to upgrade the video card to make it more capable?
thanks

Welcome to Apple Discussions!
One of the users in my system bought a mini specifically for video work - and it works extremely well. The on-board graphics don't obstruct effective use of the system for this sort of work at all, and in fact video work is perfectly feasible on systems with vastly inferior graphics cards than the one used in the mini, so that should not be a concern. The same is true of photo editing.
It's certainly true that the mini isn't the most powerful Mac of course, but to put that in context, the current Intel minis are on a general par in processing power to the top of the range G5 powermacs of 3 years ago - many of which are still in use in demanding circumstances. The mini's drawbacks are the lack of internal expansion options and the relatively slow hard drive, but a the former can be largely overcome by adding desired components externally, such as extra hard drives and burners, and the impact of the second can be mitigated to a significant degree by maxing out the RAM. Thus a 1.6 mini with 2Gb RAM will perform rather better than a 1.8 mini with the stock 512Mb.
In practice, the video card is good for all tasks short of 3D gaming - which is just as well since it's embedded on the logic board and thus cannot be replaced!

Similar Messages

  • Who is using the mac mini 2.6 gig i7 to edit video?

    Who is using the mac mini 2.6 gig i7 to edit video? (16 gigs ram)
    I will be using Premiere Pro cs6 (Hoping I can utilize The Adobe Cuda Core acceleration...anyone know?)
    also
    Gonna be using Final Cut 7
    1920-1080P, AVCHD Format. Probably gonna convert to pro-res or mpg2 before editing
    * Is the mac mini going to suit my purposes?
    * Not sure what to do about drives?? Solid state? Sata? Thunderbolt

    I use a 2012 mac mini server 2.0 i7 (quad core) 8GB ram as a second edit station with FCP 7. It works just peachy.
    I doubt the CUDA engine is going to do much for you in Premiere. You need a beefy video card designed for CUDA and the mini doesn't have one.
    Cut ProResLT and you can use FW800. Anything heavier, you'll want to go thunderbolt.
    x

  • New Hard Drive: Mac Face/Question Mark on boot

    I installed a new hard drive in my fathers iBook G4 1.33 GHz and installed Leopard. I instantly had problems after the installation was complete and the computer restarted. I got the Mac Face/Question Mark for a second and then it booted to the installation CD.
    I used disk utilities to verify and repair the disk and permissions which both finished successfully. I tried to reboot with the same result: Mac Face/Question Mark for a second and then it booted to the installation CD. I decided to erase and reinstall Leopard. Installation complete - Restart - Mac Face/Question Mark. I decided to turn if off for the night.
    I powered up in the morning with short-lived success, as I got the Leopard Welcome video. I set up the system and did some software updates, which eventually required a restart. Boom. Mac Face/Question Mark. I decided to hold the option key on my next restart to see if I could select the hard drive installation over the install CD. I was able to do so, and it booted fine to the hard drive. I continued my software updating, installed some more software like iLife '08, Firefox, Open Office, Stuffit Expander, etc. After all my installation and updating, the system operates great, except when I have to start up. I still have the Mac Face/Question Mark.
    I have a theory that the hard drive jumper is set incorrectly, but I don't want to waste 45 mins. cracking the thing open to find out. Can anyone confirm? I'm open to all other theories, of course.

    No jumper means Cable Select (CS). This would mean that the cable from the motherboard to the drive has a blue connector at the motherboard and a black connector on the end where the drive plugs in. The gray connector in the middle is the Slave position. Master/Slave relationship is determined by where on the cable the device is plugged in.
    The CS cables and the setting was not used very often until around 2004 or 2005. Until that time all of the connectors on the cable were the same color and the Master/Slave setting was determined by the jumper on the drive.
    It's very possible that you are trying to use a drive that's been setup for the newer systems as Cable Select, when actually you should force the drive to be a Master by installing a jumper on the proper pins.
    Are there two deviced on the cable besides the motherboard, and are all of the connectors the same color? Or is the connector that plugs into the motherboard black? Then you are probably not looking at a CS buss.

  • I have a Macbook Pro 13.3 i5 w/ no hdmi port. How can I connect my Mac to TV to watch video, photo ?  Is the Thunderbolt port a mini display port where I can use a mini display port to HDMI cable? If not, what are my options??

    I have a Macbook pro 13.3 w/ i5 that has no hdmi port. I want to be able to connect the Mac to my TV set to watch Video, Photos and files from Mac to TV.
    Is the Thunderbolt port similar to a display port or mini display port? Can I use thunderbolt port to connect thru a mini displayport to HDMI cable or converter?
    Been trying to locate a USB to HDMI cable or converter (at a reasonable price) but all I found is a displayport or mini displayport to HDMI cable/converter.
    What other options are available ?
    Thanks a lot for your assistance.

    Thunderbolt uses a Mini DisplayPort adapter to send video and audio to HDMI. Here's some on Amazon http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_c_2_8?url=search-alias%3Dcomputers&field-ke   ywords=mini+displayport+to+hdmi&sprefix=mini+dis%2Caps%2C249#/ref=nb_sb_noss?ur l  =search-alias%3Dcomputers&field-keywords=mini+displayport+to+hdmi+with+audio&rh =  n%3A172282%2Cn%3A!493964%2Cn%3A541966%2Ck%3Amini+displayport+to+hdmi+with+audio

  • How can I split the video port of an older Mac Mini so I can use both the 922-6199 DVI to RCA, S-Video Adapter and a Cinema Display?

    How can I split the video port of an older Mac Mini so I can use both the 922-6199 DVI to RCA, S-Video Adapter and a Cinema Display?

    Which exact Mini?
    At the Apple Icon at top left>About this Mac.
    Then click on More Info>Hardware and report this upto but not including the Serial#...
    Hardware Overview:
    Model Name: iMac
    Model Identifier: iMac7,1
    Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
    Processor Speed: 2.4 GHz
    Number Of Processors: 1
    Total Number Of Cores: 2
    L2 Cache: 4 MB
    Memory: 6 GB
    Bus Speed: 800 MHz
    Boot ROM Version: IM71.007A.B03
    SMC Version (system): 1.21f4

  • I am going to buy a mac mini i7 with 3 thunderbolt displays for forex trading. the question is if i use bootcamp and run windows on the mac mini will the displays still run the same way as if i was running it on Lion?

    I am going to buy a mac mini i7 with 3 thunderbolt displays for forex trading. the question is if i use bootcamp and run windows on the mac mini will the displays still run the same way as if i was running it on Lion?

    No idea if Windows will do it, but you can run Windows without Bootcamp & have OSX available at the same time, which should give you all the Monitors that OSX uses.
    Parallels...
    http://www.parallels.com/
    VmWare Fusion...
    http://www.vmware.com/mac

  • Can the mac mini i7, 8gigs ram,  edit avchd 1920/1080p without having to convert it?

    Can the mac mini i7, 8gigs ram,  external FW800 drive, edit avchd 1920/1080p without having to convert it?
    Can you scrub the TL at 5x speed and not have it stutter?

    By default it converts it to ProRes 422, though you can specify other codecs.
    Why convert it?
    Although FCP X can handle AVCHD natively, AVCHD being a "delivery" codec is not really suitable for editing.
    ProRes is designed specifically for ease of editing especially with complex effects and colour correction.
    If your editing is going to be fairly basic you can get away with leaving your media as AVCHD.
    Note also that an hour of ProRes is around 50GB !

  • Which is a better performer, the macbook air or the mac mini?

    Which one performs better, the late 2013 macbook air (standard configuration: 4GB RAM, dual core i5 1,3 Ghz CPU) or the mac mini core quad core i7, 4GB RAM with a regular hard disc?

    LowLuster 
    No Air model can be as fast as a Mini with a quad core i7 CPU. Can't happen.
    I didnt solicit your opinion, and it IS a fact, .....skilled users here on this board will and DO TELL other users OFTEN that:
    "outside of processor core use (video/ photo etc.) you will NOT NOTICE ANY DIFFERENCE on X computer vs. slower Y computer"
    I have a 8 month old QUAD core Mac Mini and it is , as I said above "noticeably not ONE BIT" faster than my current 2013 macbook Air with 8gig.
    My quad core came with 4gig of RAM as I recall, I immediately tossed in 16gig.
    Notice the word "noticeably"
    Your subjective hyperbole aside, you are wrong......., those above yourself and myself (point wise,...as Ogel has stated, Clinton has stated, and others) state this fact very often regarding ---"outside of processor core use (video/ photo etc.) you will NOT NOTICE ANY DIFFERENCE on X computer vs. slower Y computer"
    Its not my opinion, its a fact, namely additionally that I stated "noticeably"   - "my quad core mac mini on MOST EVERYTHING (which is most things since 'most things' are NOT photo and video editing) is not "noticeably" ONE BIT faster than my Macbook Air.
    "most things" people do (most people) on their computer does NOT involve photo and video editing (photoshop pro, final cut pro etc etc)
    This is a fact, that AS SUCH most people WILL NOT notice any difference in general computer use between a quad core mac mini (for example) and a entry level macbook Air. (SSD vs. HD speeds aside).       Nobody is going to notice faster youtube, or Word use, or websurfing, Acrobat Pro, Quicktime play, general APPS that havent changed much in 7 years.
    Dont curse on these family boards please, its uncouth.
    Peace

  • Is the mac mini server the same hardware as the other mac minis (except for the quad core i7 and dual hard drives) with different software or is it configured differently?

    I have a mac mini with an i7 dual core processor. It is perceptably slower than my macbook pro with a quad core i7. Does the mac mini server have the same hardware configuation as the regular mac mini with server software or is the hardware different (aside from the i7 quad core and dual hard drives)? I want a mini with a quad core i7...

    Your assumption is correct.  The server does however only
    have the Intel HD3000 graphics like the base model with
    no option, at this time, for the discrete graphics chip.  So,
    depending on what you are using it for, that could be a deal
    breaker.  Remember that your MBP does have a discrete
    graphics chip.
    I have a 2011 Mini Server connected to a Thunderbolt display
    that gets used as an engineering workstation and general
    personal use (some photo editing, LP restoraton, general
    internet browsing).  You simply just not enable any of the
    server services.  I find the combination to work quite well
    for my purposes.  I also have a 13" 2.7 GHz i7 Macbook Pro
    which is pretty much strictly for work.  As far as CPU
    power it is pretty much equivelent to your Mini.  For the most
    part I find the Mini does outperfom my MBP.  I heavily use
    Parallels and Windows7 virtual machines, so the more cores
    the better.
    So, If you do a lot of CPU intensive stuff that is multithreaded,
    the Server may help.  If it is graphics intensive and your software
    heavily leaverages the GPU, you may actually take a hit on
    performance.

  • Video Out from early 2009 Mac Mini

    Is there any way to go from one of the video outs on the Mini to a converter of some sort, then to video input or S video input on a TV monitor? I see that the Mini DVI to Video does not work with my version of the Mac Mini. Any other solutions?

    Grant Lenahan wrote:
    The additional pins do little. A DVI-I plug will work with either.
    What do you think wont work?
    A DVI monitor will work on DVI or DVI-I.
    A DVI-I monitor will work on DVI or DVI-I
    Dont believe me? Try it ( or read the spec).
    Grant
    You commented as to why make the special connector. I gave an answer based upon the original question to this post which is about +_getting a analog composite video or S-video signal to a Mini, NOT a DVI monitor_+.
    Apple makes and sells an adapter to provide composite and S-video from the DVI connector of certain Mac models of Macbook Pro and Mac Pro. (I use one.) But since the Mini does not produce the analog signals, the adapter will not work, even if you could physically plug it in to the Mini. So if Apple did as you say and made the computer with the connector to use either a DVI-D or DVI-I adapter, in my example, if the aforementioned person with lesser technical knowledge plugged in the S-video connector to the Mini, they'd be angry that it didn't work. Again to avoid the "Why would Apple sell something that wouldn't work on my computer if it fits?!" type of support calls.

  • General Mac Mini Questions/Inquiries

    I had recently complained to my mom about our old monitor on our PC and she surprised me with an HP 24" widescreen monitor. This was a great gift on her behalf, but I have this monster connected to a Dell Tower.
    I have a serious interest in shedding the Dell tower for a mac mini. My first question is, should their be a flawless transfer over if I shed the old tower and hook the fantastic new monitor up to a Mac Mini? Also, I see the Mac Mini runs on wireless G. Do you think that's substancially slower than the Wireless N band that the Imac posseses? Will I be able to run and use Imovie and Final Cut Pro nicely using the mac mini?
    Sorry for all the questions, but responses are greatly appreciated. Thanks!!!
    PS.
    Is their any advantage over using a new Imac vs. a Mac Mini and my HP monitor?

    I don't see any reason the monitor shouldn't work with the mini since the mini supports 1920x1200 resolution with the DVI connection (the same as your monitor). Check out all the mini's specs here:
    http://www.apple.com/macmini/specs.html
    With respect to overall performance of the mini versus an iMac, there will be less graphic performance with the mini due to the integrated Intel video processor as opposed to a dedicated video card. Also, the mini's hard drive and bus speeds are slower which gives overall diminished system performance compared to an iMac. For casual iMovie projects a mini is probably OK, but for more intensive video projects, it may not be the best mac for the job.

  • How about the Mac mini as an Apple TV with a HD?

    Has anyone tried a Mac mini with its HDMI output as a substitute for the now old model Apple TV? Yes, it is more expensive and needs a keyboard but it has a huge HD that could hold all your music photos and video and be located right at your TV. Once it booted you could use Front Row and a remote to control it. Once I saw that the Mac mini came with an HDMI output, I wondered if the days were numbered for Apple TV.
    Any obvious downsides?

    Has anyone tried a Mac mini with its HDMI output as a substitute for the now old model Apple TV?
    Yes, I did and it works great. It's a Mac, so it has the OS X desktop rather than the ATV media browser, but playing HD video through it's HDMI port is great. It can play all of my iTunes videos in addition to just about everything an ATV can't play. I'm using it mainly to watch Hulu Plus at present.
    It has been correctly pointed out in the past that some HD rentals from the iTunes store are available only through the ATV, but the new ATV does not have a hard drive, so direct purchases will be impractical. I expect that rental restriction will change in iTunes 10 as all content for the new ATV will have to stream from another location.

  • Opinions about the Mac Mini

    Hey!
    I wanna know if Mac mini is good performance.
    I would like to use it mainly for Web Design (Photoshop) and Video Editing (less than Web Design though)
    What's your opinions about it.

    Hello,
    The Mac Mini is a great computer. And, it is capable of doing everything you are asking about.
    But, you will potentially find it less pleasurable to use for intensive graphics work than an iMac.
    The Mac Mini uses an Integrated Video system that borrows it's memory from the system's memory. So, it's performance is going to be lower when compared to the iMac.
    This primarily affects things being drawn to the screen, not the processing of information / graphics data.
    So, you won't find a problem in terms of crunching information and producing stuff. But, you may observe in some situations that the video / pictures being displayed on the screen may lag a bit.
    But, you'll usually only notice that in something with a high frame-rate (such as animations) or in 3D drawing or animation.
    Otherwise, it's a perfectly fine computer.
    It's price is a bit high for the lower performance it offers in comparison to the iMac systems. So, if you really want the best performance and the most for your money, then look towards the iMac.
    But, if the performance of the Mac Mini is acceptable to you, and you already have a large monitor that you like, then the Mini may be a good buy for you.
    My main complaints are that the CoreDuo model has rather humble specs compared to the iMac and it costs $800 before you add the additional memory that you will definitely want.
    The iMac starts at $1299, but comes with a monitor built-in, a much faster microprocessor, a significantly larger hard drive, and a dedicated graphics controller with it's own memory. So, you really get a good deal for your money.
    So, the way I see it, the Mini is an excellent computer, but hardly a deal when you compare what you get for your money.
    The iMac costs a bit more, but you get a lot for your money.
    And, you can always buy a refurbished iMac from Apple, and get the price as low as $1099.
    Apple Certified Refurbished Products
    Either way you go, you'll get a great computer. You just need to decide how much computer you want for your money.
    If you want a system with a large (and fast) hard drive, a fast graphics card, fast processor, and large screen, then go with the iMac.
    If you just want a computer that will get the job done, and have your own monitor already, then the Mac Mini may be a good purchase for you.
    You should also consider that Adobe has not upgraded their programs to be "Universal" yet. So, they will run using the slower and more demanding "Rosetta" translator built-into OS X.
    This means that you will need more memory (to hold the translated code). It also means that the performance of those programs will be slower. So, you'll want the fastest processor you can get (or afford) to help off-set the reduced performance.
    Basically, Rosetta is a translator that converts PowerPC code to run on Intel processors. This translated code is stored in memory while you are using the program, and therefore requires more memory to operate. So, you'll observe a decrease in performance if you start running low on memory. So, you'll want as much memory as you can get (1 GB or 2 GB would be preferable).
    Additionally, running in Rosetta is slower. So, you'll want a faster processor to help speed things up a bit when using older PowerPC programs.
    It has been said that Photoshop will run acceptably on the iMac, but it is noticeably slower. I could only imagine that it would be even slower on the Mac Mini due to it's slower processor.
    I hope this helps.

  • Is there a way to use the iMac's display mode with a Mac mini with out logging in first on the Mac mini

    Is there a way to use the iMac's display mode with a Mac mini with out logging in first on the Mac mini (late2014)
    im currently useing my Mac mini as a portable computer, I take it to the university and use the iMacs there as a monitor but before I can do that I have to log in to my Mac mini first which means doing it blind
    is there a way to put the IMacs into display mode with out logging into my Mac mini first
    or is there a portable monitor that I can use that will not require me to login first

    This
    Target Display Mode: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) - Apple Support
    says:
    How do I enable TDM?
    Make sure both computers are turned on and awake. 
    Connect a male-to-male Mini DisplayPort or ThunderBolt cable to each computer.
    Press Command-F2 on the keyboard of the iMac being used as a display to enable TDM.
    Note: In Keyboard System Preferences, if the checkbox is enabled for "Use all F1, F2, etc. keys as standard functions keys," the key combination changes to Command-Fn-F2.
    How do I exit TDM?
    To leave TDM, press Command-F2 on the keyboard of the iMac that is in TDM. You can also exit TDM if you shutdown or sleep either computer or detach the cable.
    Can I use a third-party keyboard or older Apple keyboard to enable TDM?
    Some older Apple keyboards and keyboards not made by Apple may not allow Command-F2 to toggle display modes. You should use an aluminum wired or wireless Apple keyboard to toggle TDM on and

  • What Monitors WILL work with the Mac-Mini?

    If the new Mac-Mini does not put out analog video and Apple does not state this, what monitors will work with it?

    I was able to get an Apple Studio Display to work via the adapter in the Mac Mini box combined with that huge DVI to ADC adapter they had sold me years ago. In the Apple Store I really had to press them to assure me my display would work as they told me they'd charge me a re-stock fee if I had to bring the Mini back. I pressed the point that Apple should know if a monitor it made works with a computer it made. The rep asked around and we both searched the web and then she was able to confirm it would work. They really need a list of acceptable monitors. If anyone locates such a list, please let us all know!

Maybe you are looking for