View Mapping Result between two Interface Mappings in ccBPM

Hello,
I've got a ccBPM which does two interface mappings. The second one fails. When I redo the steps manually in the Interface Mapping test mode everything works fine. Anyway, I want to get the message from the failed BPM that got out of the first interface mapping, which worked fine in the BPM as well, before entering the second.
Where can I get that message? In Monitoring I can only find messages that got sent.
Thanks for you help!
Regards,
Dirk

Hi,
Please check in Runtime Workbench.
Go to Adapter Engine --> Component Monitoring
Now select your Adapter.
Use Filter and below you will find message ids.
select one and you can see the audit log..where your appln fails.
You can also use SXMB_MONI.
Select the message giving error and in that goto outbound tab..click on link...select view details image button...select the component with error and go to container tab of it....there you will find trace entry....where log of your error will be stored..
Hope it helps.
Best Of Luck
Akhil
Edited by: Akhil Rastogi on Mar 18, 2008 11:08 AM

Similar Messages

Intermediate result between two message mappings

Hi,
we have a Scenario with an Interface mapping, which is created from two message mappings. The first one receives the source message and the second one sends the target message.
I have a trouble with finding the intermediate result between the two message mappings.
Do you have an idea, where to find it?
Thank you for your help.

hi,
the only way i think to do the same is to have a CCBPM.....
- here u should have the receive step,transformation step and a send step...
- and then go to sxmb_moni,then there go into the process engine and see the graphical view.
- here you will be able to view the intermediate result also clearly.
-we cannot do the same without a CCBPM because,in the normal method u can only see the source and target results and not the intermediated result as in the case of CCBPM

NAT between two interfaces

Good day,
I would ask if it is possible to do NAT between two Interfaces on the same device?
The problem is that I need access from my inside lan to the management interface on the ASA. We will not manage the ASA over the inside interface.
This is my current NAT statement:
nat (inside,mgmt) source static 172.20.200.0-24 192.168.3.222 destination static 192.168.3.0-24 192.168.3.0-24 unidirectional
This is my PacketTracer output:
Phase: 1Type: ROUTE-LOOKUPSubtype: inputResult: ALLOWConfig:Additional Information:in 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 mgmt
Phase: 2Type: ACCESS-LISTSubtype: logResult: ALLOWConfig:access-group inside in interface insideaccess-list inside extended permit ip 172.20.200.0 255.255.255.0 anyAdditional Information:Phase: 3Type: IP-OPTIONSSubtype:Result: ALLOWConfig:Additional Information:Phase: 4Type: NATSubtype:Result: ALLOWConfig:nat (inside,mgmt) source static 172.20.200.0-24 192.168.3.222 destination static 192.168.3.0-24 192.168.3.0-24 unidirectionalAdditional Information:Static translate 172.20.200.1/0 to 192.168.3.222/0Phase: 5Type: USER-STATISTICSSubtype: user-statisticsResult: ALLOWConfig:Additional Information:Phase: 6Type: FLOW-CREATIONSubtype:Result: ALLOWConfig:Additional Information:New flow created with id 244039047, packet dispatched to next moduleResult:input-interface: insideinput-status: upinput-line-status: upoutput-interface: mgmtoutput-status: upoutput-line-status: upAction: allow
So NAT seems to be working correct. I can reach other devices behind the mgmt network this is no problem. But I cant access the ASA on the mgmt interface 192.168.3.2.
Clould it be a problem with the traffic flow? Because in the PacketTracer output I see on Phase1 a Route-Lookup and later on Phase4 the NAT statement.
Is there a way to get this working?
Many thanks for your feedback.
Brgds,
Markus

Hi,
To my understanding its not possible to connect to an ASA interface through interface other than the interface where the IP address is located.
In other words you are not able to connect from behind "inside" to the IP address of "mgmt" interface
I will try to find you a link to some Cisco documentation stating this. (I have never really had to find it though)
- Jouni

ASA5510 - Verifying NAT is fully disabled between two interfaces

Hello,
I am trying to configure two inside interfaces without NAT. I am not using nat-control and I have added exemptions for the two networks. I can communicate between the two networks and to the Internet just fine.
I would like to verify that NAT is disabled between the two interfaces. I also need to make sure that the Interface IP (specifically for the traffic from inside-test to the inside network) is not added to packets between the two networks. I would like to be able to verify this as well. In other words I need to have the Source IP address from the originating connection on the inside-test network passed along through to the Inside network device without being replaced by the Interface's IP address. This is a test config for a production environment that will be using a load balancer. The config I have may be working in this regard and the load balancer may be replacing this IP address (that is what I am trying to test), but I am not certain.
So far I have the following NAT related running-config command (in regards to these two interfaces):
access-list NAT_Exempt extended permit ip 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0 interface inside
access-list NAT_Exempt extended permit ip 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 interface Inside-test
access-list NAT_Exempt extended permit ip 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0
access-list NAT_Exempt_2 extended permit ip 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0 interface inside
access-list NAT_Exempt_2 extended permit ip 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 interface Inside-test
access-list NAT_Exempt_2 extended permit ip 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 0 access-list NAT_Exempt_2
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
nat (Inside-test) 0 access-list NAT_Exempt
nat (Inside-test) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
global (outside) 1 interface
global (Inside-test) 1 interface
Let me know if more information is needed for you to assist me futher.
Thank you.

Thank you Jennifer for your responses.
Do I need to include access-list commands for both directions for each interface as listed in my full config above, or do I just need one for one direction on one and one direction on the other interface (plus the exempt for the 69.x.x.x network)?
Would this config suffice?
access-list NAT_Exempt_2 permit ip 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0
access-list NAT_Exempt_2 permit ip 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 69.87.157.192 255.255.255.224
access-list NAT_Exempt permit ip 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0
access-list NAT_Exempt permit ip 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0 69.87.157.192 255.255.255.224
nat (inside) 0 access-list NAT_Exempt_2
nat (inside-test) 0 access-list NAT_Exempt
Will I need to clear xlate to see the results of this or will this take affect immediately? I can't really do that during business hours, but should be able to after hours if I need to.
Can you clarify what the global commands do? I keep thinking that it adds the IP of the Interface to packets as they go through the interface and that I should use a different config for the Inside-test network.
I will try the xlate detail to verify and let you know what I find.
Thank you.

Load balancing between two interfaces on 2811

Hi,
We have a 2811 router with VPN and NAT configured. We have two internet connection from different ISPs. The speed of our original connection is 2MB up and down. The speed of our new connection is 1MB up and down. We want to configure load balancing between the two connections. Our new ISP has provided us with a CISCO 837 router. We want to connect that router into our 2811 on one of the free WIC card and then configure load balancing between the two interfaces on our 2811. The third interface has a local address configured. Please suggest where to start. I tried searching on net for any configuration example but I was unable to find any particular example with commands. I am new on CISCO platform. Any help will be hugely appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Raju,
you have two choices as far as I can see. If you want to use static routing over the WAN to your branch, you could duplicate your static routes to the branch and point them to the secondary router. You will have two identical sets of static routes in the primary router, one set pointing to the WAN interface and the other one pointing to the secondary router.
ip route x.x.x.x "WAN-interface"
ip route x.x.x.x "secondary router"
ip route y.y.y.y "WAN-interface"
ip route y.y.y.y "secondary router"
etc.
As a result the primary router will have two routes to the branch and will load-balance. If one next-hop fails (either the WAN interface or the secondary router), only the other will be used. If the next-hop comes back up, load-balancing will resume.
The other choice would be to use EIGRP over the WAN, and make sure the two routers become EIGRP neighbors. Then you can use the "variance" command to achieve unequal cost load-balancing between the two routers. Let me know if you need more information about this, but i think static routes will be sufficient in your situation.
HTH, Thomas

How to add Two Interface Mappings to One Receiver(BPM) Help needed urgently

I have a requirement where i get a flat file and split into multiple files and send to BPM.
For each split file I created Interface Mapping using Java Mapping Program.
In the Configuration how to add more Interface Mappings?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Regards
Sudha

You can use Enhanced Interface Determination to split one message to Multiple hence to multiple Interfaces.
You have to change the Occurance of Messages in Message Mapping and their Corresponding Interfaces in Interface Mapping. That would create Multiple Files with Multiple Interfaces to Receiver (BPM)
1) You need not to use Multilpe Interface Mapping
2) You will use Extended Interface Determination for this.
regards.
Jeet.

The order doesn't work in my view with join between two lists. And now?

Hi,
I work with sharepoint 2010.
I did the join between two list follow this
post.
I did it and everything is ok, but the order doesn't work.
What can be it?
Thanks
K2rto'4 - Analista Sharepoint
"Hoje melhor do que ontem, amanhã melhor do que hoje!" 改善

Hi,
I've two lists in my view with join. The list A and the list B.
I'm ordering the view with the column list A.
The column list A it's a column for type lookup to list B's column.
In my view i'm ordering with the column list A of type lookup.
The view with join is not ordering in order growing.
I want the view will be ordering by order growing.
Do you understood?
Hugs
K2rto'4 - Analista Sharepoint
"Hoje melhor do que ontem, amanhã melhor do que hoje!" 改善

Problems with materialized view and fk between two db

Hi,
i have two databases db1 and db2 and from db1 is a table(DM_MESSDATEN) which contains a foreign key to a table(DM_FAUNA) in db2.
Now I want to write my done steps to get more clearification and hopefully someone can point out my wrong steps.
1st
i create the tables inside db1 without a foreign key to the table in db2.
2nd
i create a database link inside db1 to db2
create public database link DATENBANK2 connect to phantomas identified by bachelor06 using 'DMDB2';
3rd
now and here i stuck want to create a materialized view inside db1
create materialized view DATAMART_MVW AS
select * from DM_MESSDATEN, DM_FAUNA@DATENBANK2
where DM_MESSDATEN.FAUNA_ID=DM_FAUNA.FAUNA_ID;
or should the view be created inside of db2?
4th
and then i want to reactivate the foreign key inside the table of db1- but can't because of
problems in step 3 :(
So it would be nice if someone could help me
thanks a lot
thomas

I think you haven't been clear in your statement of your problem:
now and here i stuck want to create a materialized view inside db1Why are you stuck? If you want to enforce a froeign key locally using data from a remote database then you need to build a materialized view on your local table tablespace that sucks data across from the remote database. You can then create a foreign key on your local table using the local MV.
If the remote table is updated frequently and you want the local MV kept in sync then you will need to put soem further replication in place. For instance you may need to create a materilaized view log on the remote database.
Cheers, APC

Mapping attributes between two resources

Hi All,
Is there a way to map attributes of one resource to another?
If so let me know how it can be done?
regards,
Zebra8

Hi,
Can you please be more clear in your reply. I am not able to get what you want to say.
Thanks,
Shankar

Interface Mappings are not displayed in Receiver Determination

Hi friends,
 I'm doing Enhanced Receiver determination.. but in this if i select Extended radio button in the receiver determination .. I'm not gettting any search help for selecting my Interface mappings..
what misteqe i did.. for getting those interface mappings does we need to do..any special things .
i followed the bellow blog.. but like that i'm not getting... and how many interface mappings do we need to create for this..
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
plz suggest me..
thanks
BABU

Hi Prabhu..
 Thank you for ur spontenious respnose ..I Mentioned the receiver business services in the user defined function which i creted in the message mappings .. is there any other place also do we nned to mention..
actuvally , i have one source struturce that and Two Receiver strutures..
1) Sendor_DT
 PERSON
 NAME
 AGE
 ADRESS
2) Receiver_DT_1 ( this is for Male person details )
 PERSON
 NAME
 AGE
 ADRESS
3) Receiver_DT_2 (this is for Female Person Details )
 PERSON
 NAME
 AGE
 ADRESS
for this.. i created Three message mappings.. ( one for soource to first recevier )
and next for ( source to second receiver)
and for third for source to RECEIVERS ( MESSAGE TYPE FROM SAP -BASIS component )
in the mapping
i created one user defined function and i map that to split message..
in that user defined function i wrote the bellow coding
int i;
int mr=0;
int ms=0;
for(i=0; i<a.length;i++)
 if( a.substring(0,2).equals("Mr") && mr==0)
 result.addValue("AATRNG_TEST_4_BS_IB1");
 mr=1;
 if( a.substring(0,2).equals("Ms") && ms==0)
 result.addValue("AATRNG_TEST_4_BS_IB2");
 ms=1;
</textarea>
and i created two interface mappings .. and i created three business services.. three communication channels. and two recever aggriments.. and two interface determinations .. and one sendor aggriment and receiver determination with EXTENDED . and i used those interface mappings in recever detrmination ....
but why file was not loaded into receiver side..
thanks
Babu

Question on use of multi-mappings in interface mappings

We have the following scenario :
1. XI receives a orders05 idoc - xml and does a first message map - splitting this xml into two - a lookup key msg type and a copy of orders05 msg type ( 1:n )
2. These two messages from the first mapping are used in a second message mapping ( of type multi-mapping too ) ( n:1) to create the final orders05 message.
3. These two message maps are put sequentially in the interface mapping.
orders05 -> MessageMapping1 -> MessageMapping2 -> orders05 . Please note that our objective is to send one single ORDERS05 idoc into the end R3 system - using the idoc adapter. The use of multi-mapping is in the interim - and not in the idoc adapter.
Issues:
a. the "ns0:Messages" and "ns:Message[n]" tags are not being created automatically.
b. In the interface determination we do not see the interface mapping when we select the 'enhanced' option.
Any ideas, pointers as to what I am missing here ? I am on a critical timeline to implement this and can't understand whats going wrong ?

Michal,
In your suggestion - to use two interface mappings - how I can configure the two interface mappings as a part of a single interface determination so that they execute one after the other . Or is it two interface determinations - one for each interface mapping - how do I relate these two ?
Also, I assume that since the message mappings in the interface mappings are multimappings , I need to use enhanced interface determination .
Could you share one of the scenarios wherein you had two interface mappings execute in a series - ? Thanks for your time.

CISCO ASR901 BRIDGE BETWEEN 2 INTERFACES

Hi All!
I'm looking for some way to make a transparent bridge between two interfaces of a Cisco router ASR901 , is there any possibility? I ask this because I have a scenario where I would use the ASR901 to the following question :
POP01 (                       ) ASR901 g0 / 6 -------- > ISG_7206
POP02 ( MPLS CLOUD )               g0 / 7 -------- > ISG_7206
POP03 (                       )
The ASR901 will focus EoMPLS with other points in the network and pass on to ISG routers , ie , VLANs would have to be two ports with XConnect to a remote router , the configuration would be something like this :
interface GigabitEthernet0/6
Core description : MPLS CONC PPPOE02
no ip address
negotiation auto
hold- queue 1024 in
hold- queue 1024 in October
service instance 4095 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 4094
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
interface GigabitEthernet0/7
Core description : 7206_PPPOE_01
no ip address
negotiation auto
service instance 4095 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 4094
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
end
L2VPN XConnect context TEST
ethernet interworking
member 201.55.127.202 1212 encapsulation mpls group TEST
member GigabitEthernet0 / 7 service -instance TEST 4095 group priority 1
member GigabitEthernet0 / 6 service -instance 4095
redundancy group delay 1 3 TEST
But without an interface that was redundant of other , what I need is the 2 interfaces in " bridge " making a XConnect to a remote router , and these 2 interfaces connected ISGs in 2 to make a balance .

Hi,
This discussion is for IOS-XR related questions. You should post your question under Service Provider > MPLS.
thanks,
rivalino

CISCO ASR901 BRIDGE BETWEEN 2 INTERFACES WITH XCONNECT

Hi All!
I'm looking for some way to make a transparent bridge between two interfaces of a Cisco router ASR901 , is there any possibility? I ask this because I have a scenario where I would use the ASR901 to the following question :
POP01 (                            ) ASR901 g0 / 6 -------- > ISG_7206
POP02 ( MPLS CLOUD )                   g0 / 7 -------- > ISG_7206
POP03 (                            )
The ASR901 will focus EoMPLS with other points in the network and pass on to ISG routers , ie , VLANs would have to be two ports with XConnect to a remote router , the configuration would be something like this :
interface GigabitEthernet0/6
Core description : MPLS CONC PPPOE02
no ip address
negotiation auto
hold- queue 1024 in
hold- queue 1024 in October
service instance 4095 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 4094
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
interface GigabitEthernet0/7
Core description : 7206_PPPOE_01
no ip address
negotiation auto
service instance 4095 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 4094
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
end
L2VPN XConnect context TEST
ethernet interworking
member 201.55.127.202 1212 encapsulation mpls group TEST
member GigabitEthernet0 / 7 service -instance TEST 4095 group priority 1
member GigabitEthernet0 / 6 service -instance 4095
redundancy group delay 1 3 TEST
But without an interface that was redundant of other , what I need is the 2 interfaces in " bridge " making a XConnect to a remote router , and these 2 interfaces connected ISGs in 2 to make a balance .

Hello,
I do not believe that the ASR901 will do this without help from an upstream device. If I understand correctly, you want to build a bridge-domain with 3 EFPs: 2 physical ports, and one pseudowire. As of the last IOS revision that I have configured on this platform, the 901 doesn't support the pseudowire on a bridge-domain, only a service instance.
It seems to me that you would need an upstream box involved to support this.
Either:
Build 2 pseudowires to an upstream box that supports this configuration (like an ME 3600x, ME3800x, or 9k).
or
Associate both service instances to a common bridge domain that is extended to an upstream box that is initiating the pseudowire. More platforms would support this, since it does not require supporting the pseudowire on a bridge domain.
...Unless you are looking to build an LACP channel-group on the interfaces connected to the ISGs to load-balance. The 901 supports LACP, and it also supports building an EFP (service instance) on the channel-group interface. This technically makes the 2 physical interfaces one EFP. The part of this that I have not tried is building a pseudowire on an EFP on a channel-group.
Hope this helps.
Jason

Problem mapping a 1:M relationship between two entity EJBs w/ a compound PK

I am having trouble trying to implement a 1:M relationship in OC4J 9.0.3 between two EJB2.0 entity beans using an EJBQL query. I have an ApplicantEJB, which contains a collection of phone numbers. The applicant table in the database has one primary key, applicant_id. The applicant_phones database table has a compound primary key--applicant_id and phone_type_id--so I have implemented a custom PK class to represent this, PhonePK. I have implemented a findByNameAndPhone method in my ejb-jar.xml file with the following syntax:
SELECT object(a) FROM applicants a, applicant_phones p where a.applicantID = p.applicantID and a.name = ?1 and p.phoneNumber = ?2
If I deploy this, Orion/OC4J translates the query in the orion-ejb-jar.xml with an incorrect reference to the applicant_phones.applicant_id column:
SELECT a.applicant_id FROM applicants a , applicant_phones p WHERE ((a.applicant_id = p.applicantID ) AND (a.name = ?) AND (p.phone_number = ? ))
I must have something wrong with my ApplicantEJB and PhoneEJB primary key mappings in my orion-ejb-jar.xml file, but I have tried many different combinations of values and keep getting them overwritten by the container with each deployment. Why is Orion/OC4J defaulting the applicant_id reference Long postings are being truncated to ~1 kB at this time.

Sure. Here's the <entity-deployment> for my applicant entity:
<entity-deployment name="ApplicantEntityEJB" location="ApplicantEntityEJB" table="applicants" data-source="java:/OracleDS">
<primkey-mapping>
<cmp-field-mapping name="applicantID" persistence-name="applicant_id"/>
</primkey-mapping>
<cmp-field-mapping name="name" persistence-name="name"/>
<cmp-field-mapping name="phones">
<collection-mapping table="applicant_phones">
<primkey-mapping>
<cmp-field-mapping name="applicantID">
<entity-ref home="ApplicantEntityEJB">
<cmp-field-mapping name="applicantID" persistence-name="applicant_id"/>
</entity-ref>
</cmp-field-mapping>
</primkey-mapping>
<value-mapping type="test.entity.PhoneEntity">
<cmp-field-mapping>
<entity-ref home="PhoneEntityEJB">
<cmp-field-mapping>
<fields>
<cmp-field-mapping name="phoneTypeID" persistence-name="phone_type_id"/>
<cmp-field-mapping name="applicantID" persistence-name="app[i]Long postings are being truncated to ~1 kB at this time.

View Link between two query views

Hi is it possible to create a view link between two views having the where clause bind variables.
How you set the bind variables at the run time for the View objects. It is giving hard time for me to use the Master view in the XmlData bean to generate the Xml document.
I am able to set the Master views bind variables, but for view link destination view
where clause bind variables are not able to set ( link object link condition bind variables are binded run time but the views where chause bind variables of destination view are unable to setand bind)
Thanks
null

Easiest way to do this is to add additional transient attributes to your master view object, and then include those additional transient attributes in the list of source attributes for your view link. This way, you can get BC4J to automatically refer to their values with no additional code on your part.

View Mapping Result between two Interface Mappings in ccBPM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for