Wacom Wireless random brush strokes

Hi everybody!
Has anyone tested Wacom Intuos4 Wireless tuned with PhotoShop CS5 on MAC OSX Leopard (10.5.8)?
The thing is whenever I work wirelessly with any of brush/brushlike tools (brush itself, dodge, burn, sharpen, blur etc.)) in Photoshop CS5, straight lines are triggered randomly every now and then. Some guys on the forum have experienced a similar problem on Windows 7.
I’ve tried (heaps of times and applying different sequencies) the following for the remedy:
Uninstalled the driver
Unpaired Wacom Tablet
Updated PS5 (12.0.4 update)
Set PS5 to its default settings
Cleaned iMac
Repaired Disk Permissions
Reinstalled the driver (tried 4 different releases including the newest one).
Paired Wacom back etc...
etc ...as advised by Wacom support team.
Alas! None of the methods have worked.
I would really appreciate if anybody can cast some light on how to resolve the issue (prevent PS5 drawing/retouching tools from randomly triggering unwanted strokes).
Cheers!
P.S. I'm currently on Intel based iMac, OSX Leopard 10.5.8, 32 bit

Thanks Grant H!
Leopard 10.6 and latest versions are Leopard Snow updates. I'm currently on Leopard 10.5.8.
If I knew for sure that Leopard Snow fixes the bug, I would buy/upgrade to a newer OSX. It might as well be a Wacom Wireless "hardware bug", as one of a technical support representatives said when I called Wacom for help. I'm still looking for similar bugs from other www community guys. None relevant info has been found yet.
Probably, I need more feedback from the members of our Forum.
Cheers anyway, Grant H!

Similar Messages

PSE 8 brush strokes randomly change to heavy line thickness

I installed PSE 8 on a trial offer and when I use my Wacom stylus, the line thickness randomly changes to a heavy line. I've cleared prefrences, and reloaded the Wacom drivers and messed with sensitivity. Any suggestions?

Hi,
PSE allows user to change various parameters by the Pen pressure of the Wacom Tablet.
While using Brush tool, You will find an arrow icon on the tool bar at the end, Opening it, you will find several parameters whicj can be controlled by Wacom tablet Pen pressure. So while you are using brush with the Pen, the pressure you apply on the Wacom, increases the brush size.
In case you need to change the Opacity of the brush, you can set it from the options bar and continue using and do Wonders.
Try it. This is really good.
Thanks,
Swarnima

Adjustment brush applies brush strokes randomly

I'm running XP & when I use the adjustment brush it slows down and then applies brush strokes in areas that I have not painted.

I have the same problem with Vista. How did you
solve it?

How to achieve less smoothing with brush strokes and wacom?

Is there a smoothing setting for brushes? When I draw certain shapes with sharper corners (like squares) illustrator rounds them out very excessively. I know there has to be a certain amount of smoothing to convert a stroke made by the user into a vector, but is there a way to reduce the amount. Interestingly, if I draw the shape really fast, I get the desired result, however if I draw slowly, it rounds it tremendously. I would think it would be the other way around because with a slower stroke you are giving more input points and therefore more precision but this is obviously not the case. Basically, I want to achieve brush strokes that more accurately represent my input. Thanks in advance for the help.

thanks so much for the quick reply! It couldn't be any easier. I just lowered the fidelity setting to the minimum and it is behaving perfectly.

Brush strokes very slow to render in PS 2014

Running CC PS 2014 on a MacPro 3.7 GHz with 32Gb RAM
Large brush strokes take many seconds, sometimes tens of seconds, to render.
I bought the MacPro with lots of RAM thinking the problem would be solved.
I've fiddle with the GPU setting with no joy. I set the system on the MacPro via Migration Assistant from my 17" MBPro. The MBPro suffered the same problem despite 16Gb RAM.
The MBPro system was migrated from a 2010 MacPro where I originally encountered the issue.
My feeling is that somehow the issue has originated on the 2010 MacPro and has embedded itself on the current systems by using the Migration Assistant.
The issue is consistent with or without using a Wacom tablet and is obviously exaggerated depending on file size.
My files are consistently minimum 90mb and often go to 1Gb+.
Appreciate any help.

Two things I would try doing.
Backup to another drive with SuperDuper.
Boot off the clone, see how it runs.
Repair the internal drive with DU and follow up with Disk Warrior.
Fixed things for me when I was getting ready for 10.5.2, but in the end, and because DW 4.1 wasn't yet available to upgrade, did a fresh install when 10.5.2 was available and things have been fine.
Leopard Cache Cleaner or Path Finder 4.8 can both I think delete all those ".DS_" files which might help.
Use to be a phrase "Finder Amnesia" where it was not or was slow to do things like show new files in Finder; not showing folder sizes even when selected (command option I could 'wake it up' somewhat).
Finder is suppose to have been "improved" but it is a huge pile of code.
The only way I find Finder and system to really feel responsive - for me - is to boot from a fast dedicated boot drive, and to have /User/account on another drive or better yet, on a stripped RAID. Not an option for most, and I don't think that should even be necessary but I liked 15K drives and RAID before and addicted to speed I guess.
Outside of faster drives and more memory, not much you can do, but the above cloning (and restore back) does seem to work and worth doing - I do it once or twice a year at least, generally when there is a .x update to OS X.
I would be more inclined to suspect corrupt caches, directory, prefs, DS_Store files.

Need info about making brush strokes into objects

I have been using a Wacom graphics tablet and Freehand to create my illustrations for many years (since Freehand v.2). Since Freehand's days are obviously numbered, I have finally decided to make the switch. So far, it hasn't been that difficult, but I seem to get stuck on one problem, and for me, it is a pretty big one.
In Freehand, I select the "variable stroke" tool in order to make a variable width line. It actually doesn't make a stroke, though. It makes a shape. I can then select the points anywhere on the edge of the shape and make adjustments.
In Illustrator, I do basically the same thing. I make a stroke, and the more pressure I put on the tablet the thicker the line gets. So far, so good. But, I can't do any adjustments to the thickness, make the ends of the line taper to a point, etc. So in order to make that stroke into a shape (with points along the outside edge) that I can adjust, I have to select the stroke, go to Object, then Expand Appearance for each stroke I make. This is a tremendous timewaster for me.
My question: Is there any way to make the "Expand Appearance" function stay on so that every stroke I make is automatically converted to a shape? Or, is there another function in Illustrator CS1 that I can select that will make all of my strokes shapes as I draw them?
If it will help, you can look at some of my work to see how I use the Variable Stroke tool and how essential it is to my style of illustration at: http://www.norrishallstudio.com

Norris,
Illustrator 7 and earlier drew all brush strokes as filled shapes. (It only had calligraphic brushes.) The live centerline arrived in AI 8, along with the other brush types.
While Illustrator does not have any "auto Expand" option, and one could theoretically be added, I wonder if it might not instead be preferable to give direct user interface control over the data collected by the tablet.
For example, take the following brush stroke:
If expanded, it would look like this:
But even though the individual anchor points of the fill shape would then be editable, it would still not be convenient to do most kinds of editing. The centerline kind of edits would become very difficult. But even doing things that preserve the centerline, such as thickening the stroke or adjusting the apparent pen tilt, you would have to move anchor points on both sides, possibly adding some, adjusting handle lengths, etc.
What if there was an option, possibly available via a button on the Control Palette when a brush stroke was selected, to show control handles for the pressure and other tablet data, something like this:
The controls would have sensitive regions that activated different kinds of variation, similar to how the Bounding Box transform controls do. Possibly it would be workable to control them via the Direct Select tool, but if that turned out to interfere too much with other Direct Select tool operations (such as adjusting the direction handles of the centerline, which would be likely to often be near the pressure controls), then there could be a dedicated tool or mode for adjusting them.
There are up to 5 kinds of tablet data that are collected at each sample point: pressure, tilt, bearing, rotation, and stylus barrel pressure. But only at most four can have meaning for any brush stroke, since there are at most four brush options that can be assigned tablet data to vary by. (For calligraphic brushes, the options are angle, roundness and diameter. For scatter brushes, they are size, spacing, scatter and rotation.)
If the tablet data controls had the I-beam shape shown above, there are four easily distinguishable aspects of the control: its length, its angle relative to the centerline, the width of the crossbars, and the tilt of the crossbars relative to the I-beam vertical.
(One could imagine assigning more variation, such as controlling the two crossbars independently, or moving the I-beam offcenter, but the more variables one allows, the trickier it gets to manipulate.) One could say that the length controlled whichever tablet data point was attached to the diameter or size of the brush, the I-beam angle controlled whichever tablet data point was attached to the brush angle or rotation, the crossbar width controlled whichever tablet data point was attached to the brush spacing or roundness, and the crossbar tilt controlled whichever tablet data point was attached to the scatter distance of a scatter brush. (One could also imagine calligraphic brushes having a symmetry setting, that controlled whether the brush shape was elliptical or squashed like a pear, and attach that to the crossbar tilt.)
Since there would be way too much visual clutter to show every sample point, I think it should be sufficient to show them at anchor points, and possibly at max and min values for the variable data. If the user wanted to gain control at a position where there was no marker displayed, they could always add an anchor point.
Although I am calling it "tablet data", a path drawn with a mouse or with one of the shape tools could still have the controls. It would start initally with all "average" values since no data was collected, and tablet data would be artificially constructed by moving the controls and then saved.
If controls like that were available for live brush strokes, would you still prefer to auto-expand your brush strokes on mouse up instead of leaving them live?
(For all I know, there may be some third-party plugin that already provides some such controls. The tablet data can be accessed and modified through the AITabletData suite in the public SDK.)

"UNDO" & "BACKWARD" not working for brush strokes?

After making three consecutive brush strokes in my image:
Click on Undo once, History list backs up one step, but last stroke remains on screen. Press Undo again (Redo) and History list returns to last position, last stroke is still on screen. Click Undo again, History list backs up one step, but now brush stroke disappears as it should.
Or, after clicking Undo the first time, the brush stroke will disappear if I apply another stroke or enter a command, e.g. add new layer.
After making three consecutive brush strokes:
Use Backwards command, the History list backs up one step, but brush stroke remains on screen. Use Backwards command a second time, History list backs up another step, the last two brush strokes disappear from screen. Use Backwards a third time, History list backs up another step (now 3 steps total), and the first brush stroke disappears as it should.
These commands work fine when creating three consecutive layers, then undoing or moving backwards.
I am using CS 5.1 for Mac running OS Lion 10.7.4. This problem occurs using either a trackball, Wacom Intuos4 tablet or keyboard shortcuts. Can this be a screen-draw bug in the brush tool? Thanks.

*Rich* wrote:
I still don't know what Vertical Sync pertains to relative to OpenGL Settings. Anyone know? Thanks.
Only Adobe knows the exact implementation under the covers, but what it conceptually does is prevent display updates in the middle of a scan.
Keep in mind that what you see on the screen is sent pixel by pixel, row by row, to the monitor - much as it was done in the time of CRT displays and scanning electron beams, even though today most have LCDs.
Once the last pixel at the bottom has been sent, there is a time called the "vertical sync" time where nothing is sent, before the "scan" starts again from the top.
Setting the "Vertical Sync" option is supposed to limit display updates to only occur only during the vertical sync time.
As Conroy has said, this generally can make a display seem cleaner, as when moving something around you might see part of it moved more than another part without Vertical Sync. This is called "tearing" (as in "tearing a piece of paper in two and having the two parts not line up").
By definition the Vertical Sync option setting causes a difference in the timing and the sequence of display operations, and that may be working around a bug in the display driver on your system. It sounds kind of far-fetched, but it happens more than you might think. Adobe provides all these options to help work around problems.
-Noel

Brush preview size does not match brush stroke

The brush preview size does not match brush stroke. I've insert a pic of the problem. I tried allmost everythning, but nothing works.
Does anyone have a solution for this problem?
*I use a wacom tablet.

Is your system cursor size set to something other than normal?
under Apple, System Preferences, Universal Access.

WHY DON'T YOU AT LEAST IMPROVE THOSE BRUSH STROKES?!

I'm a professional digital artist-illustrator for about 7 years now. using photoshop since early years of my career. CS2, CS4, CS5.. on more than several mashines, top line HP workstations and EliteBook.
and one thing that bothers me and most of my colleagues is the quality of the brush strokes that PS provides.
why don't you improve em for christsake?!?
I must admit, this is a software issue, not mashine. neither the resolution, some options or tablet series has anything to do with this.. and it's especially visible on thicker strokes.
we work on intuos3, intuos4, intuos5, apple, win and whatnot. ant it's most obvious that the brush lines are as ugly as hell in this program entirely through all series.
when it comes to non-vector lineart, thats' basically why most of the artists/designers go for other progams, such as paint tool sai, sketchbook pro, manga studio and etc, and do the effects/coloring only in PS.
here's an ex. how the brush lines end. + if you work slower/move your pen more precise they go even worse!
I won't go further, like talking about the LAG with mixer brtushes and etc. most of the CG forums and communities are allready full of those discussions. you cannot even compete on this issue with other products.
that might be also a solution to rise your sales around the globe. cos now - why to buy a <1200$ worth PS program in europe when you'll probably end up mainly using paint tool sai or sketchbook pro for around 90$ and go for GIMP (free software) for effects.

I can understand a certain level of frustration, PAUZAK, but really? Are you a part of the same universe I'm in?
Your answer seems defensive; I'm just trying to help.
Points answered:
>then why other products managed to make it work?
I was only commenting on the points made in the thread YOU linked to. Apparently at least some people see the shoelace thing in the Wacom control panel. Given that evidence, which I doubt was manufactured, your pretense seems to need questioning. I suppose it's possible (actually, a certainty) that some products send different commands to the drivers than others, and that the drivers are doing things wrong only under some conditions. That's why I asked whether the Smoothing setting affected your setup.
>just like this forum.. can't make a reply like in other normal forums, or edit anything
I'm having no problems replying, or editing using any of the major browsers, including Firefox. I can't edit posts on an iPhone or iPad (not allowed to even try), but if you're using an actual computer and you can't even make the forum work, you have problems on your system.
>adobe is. cannot make the most simple things to work right and not LAG
Some operations in Photoshop are complex and when done with big brushes and all kinds of stuff (fuzzy edges, mixing, etc.) turned on they slow down, but with reasonable sized brushes I've been able to paint stuff, and I certainly don't have the world's fastest computer by today's standards. And even so, I'm not sure that's a situation where it's not working right per se... Maybe just one where a better computer is needed to paint with really big brushes and all the fancy stuff turned on. That *could* be a better computer than any invented yet, but that's okay - see next year's lineup...
>looks like the staff is obviously looking somewhere else
Wow, and you posted that *right* after one of the senior Photoshop scientist/engineers at Adobe responded specifically to you. When's the last time an engineer from any other big software company responded to you?
>Photoshop is still a huge and expencive disappointment so far. ask any pro
Yeah, all the pros just avoid Photoshop. That's why Adobe is doing so poorly as a business. They can hardly sell any copies at all!
PAUZAK, I'll go out on a limb and say making things up and trolling for shock value and blaming the world for your own problems probably aren't going to help you reach a solution.
-Noel

Drawing Inside Keeps Painting Behind Other Brush Strokes

I am currently using the draw inside feature on an object of mine. I find that when i come back to it, like if i save and close the program and then come back, whatever new stuff i paint vanishes behind rather than appearing on top. The main solid colored object I always have to send behind before i could paint over it every single time. But now that I have some details over top of that, they are cooperating the same way and need sent behind as well im assuming, with the main object being at the very back. I'd hate to try and select everything because everything around it would need locked and this and that to select what i need and its just allot of hassle, especially if i have to do it every time i re open the program. Shouldn't new brush strokes paint above everything rather than below? Any help would be highly appreciated.

I submitted something similar to this about two version back. I know
when I'm trying to draw a long line, it would be nice to be able to use
some sort of guide. I think I was imagining a tool that you could hold
with a second hand while drawing with the wacom pen. I think they really
could corner the market if they came up with something like this.
Unfortunately, I think they hold back...after all, if they give it all
away, they have nothing to upgrade to...right?
On a similar note, I vaguely remember back when ver 2or 3 of Illustrator
came out and one could fit graphics(text?) in an envelope. At the time,
it was a plugin that was subsequently removed.
For the next 50;) versions I whined about this. Finally, I think it was
version 9 or 10 that brought this feature back to Illustrator.
So given that track record, I think we might get it in version 17. Let's
cross our fingers. ;)

How can I change a brush stroke to a pencil stroke after I've drawn it?

How can I change a brush stroke to a pencil stroke after I've drawn it? Is this possible?

h,
As I (mis)understand it, (in effect) just by clicking the Reduce to Basic Appearance button in the Appearance palette (and setting the desired Stroke Weight, if different from 1pt).
The Pencil Tool creates a uniform width path like the Pen Tool, producing Anchor Points like the Artbrush Tool. So when you reduce to basic appearance you will get a path corresponding/identical to the one you would create with the Pencil Tool.

Significant delay at beginning of brush strokes on Microsoft Surface Pro 3?

Using Photoshop Elements 10, it takes an abnormally long time for a brush stroke to begin registering. This is a bit difficult to explain, so here is a visual example:
Here is what happens in photoshop elements 10 when I write 'hello':
And here is what happens if I do the same in Gimp:
As you can see, it takes a relatively long time for photoshop to begin accepting a brush stroke, but otherwise renders the line in real time. This causes significant issues when trying to draw, especially as the delay tends to vary wildly.
I have adjusted every setting I can find. I had a similar issue in Windows 7 which was fixed by disabling 'Flicks' commands, but that has had no effect here. I can find no meaningful settings in Elements 10 itself aside from adjusting its memory usage, and adjusting that has been ineffectual.
All help is appreciated - I can't stand to use Gimp another day.

Hello bblackstock-
Getting the most performance for your buck is important to me as well, but sometimes you need to save a little money and compromise on your technology solutions, so I understand your decision to go with the 64GB Surface Pro 3. I am sorry to hear that the 64GB did not live up to your expectations when you found that it had the i3 processor and you were no longer able to exchange it.
Per our Return & Exchange promise here, we do allow 15 days for most returns (30 days if you are a My Best Buy Elite member and 45 days if you are an Elite Plus member). Regrettably, beyond that time frame, we are unable to offer a return or exchange.
I apologize for any disappointment that this may cause you.
Sincerely,
Bill|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Enabling GPU in CS6 slows down brush strokes

Hello, I'm currently using Adobe Photoshop CS6 Extended and I am experiencing a performance issue with the brush tool when the GPU option is enabled in the performance preferences.
When the GPU option is disabled I am able to draw lines and marks very quickly with all of the default brush tools available. Even when options such as scattering and dual brush are turned on simultaneously the brush strokes are rendered so quickly on the canvas it feels instantaneous. This is great for me because I use Photoshop and other programs for digital drawing and painting.
However with the GPU disabled I am unable to use functions such as canvas rotation, flick panning, scrubby zoom and so on - features that I find incredibly useful. Also at different zoom levels images become highly pixelated and smooth lines appear very jagged. This obviously makes images very difficult to work with!
As soon as I turn on the GPU option, even at the most basic setting the brush tool renders much slower across the canvas than when it was turned off. However other operations such as zooming, flick panning, saving etc appear to be very fast.
This is quite confusing (and disappointing) as the brush tool is by far the most important tool I use in Photoshop. I spend more time painting marks and drawing lines than anything else. My understanding is that the brush tool should be just as fast to use (if not faster?) when the graphics processor is enabled as when it is disabled.
Here is the setup I am using:
Windows 7 Home Premium (64 bit)
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Extended (64 bit) with latest updates as of 28/11/14
Asus Geforce GTX 560 Direct CU with the latest driver 344.75
16GB available RAM
Intel i7 Quad Core CPU 3.07 GHz
As my GPU does not appear to be working hard at all when Photoshop is running even with advanced settings turned on, I can only guess that this is a problem with the Nvidia driver or Photoshop itself? It seems as if the opengl drawing mode is not communicating properly with the Nvidia driver. That's my guess so far as I'm no tech expert.
I have followed every step of the Photoshop CS6 GPU FAQ multiple times http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/photoshop-cs6-gpu-faq.html
But the problem always persists.
I have also followed the advice of others by turning brush spacing up to 10% or higher which does help a little bit but this obviously does not solve the problem!
I would be extremely grateful if anyone could help me to solve this problem - perhaps someone from Adobe can test this on a similar hardware and software setup? I would be very interested to learn what exactly is going on that is causing the slowdown.
I will also notify Nvidia and see if they are aware of the problem.
Many thanks,
Calum

Yes, it sounds like something is wrong with your video card driver.
Until Apple releases a fix, you can keep OpenGL drawing disabled.

Brush strokes show in history but not reflected on mask

I have CS4 Extended, Dell Precision M0, WinXP 64bit and 20GB of Ram (overkill I know). This issue happens most often in the 32bit version of PS which I need to use for certain filters. It also happens in the 64bit version but takes longer to manifest itself.
When I apply a filter to a duplicate layer and then add a layer mask OR of I add an adjustment layer and try to fine tune the effect by painting on the mask, the brush strokes show up in history but they have no affect on the mask. It typically happens mostly on very large files such as those from my 5DMKII but also happens if I've added several layers and masks to smaller files.
As a workaround, I can make selections and fill the area on the mask with black and it works. This is time consuming as you can imagine.
The brush problem is only related to masks. I can create a new layer, for instance, and paint on it with black or any color.
I've also had this issue when trying to use the spot removal tool or when cloning. Again...very large files.
I've entered every imaginable query and haven't had any luck! I'm hoping someone here has a clue.
Thanks in advance.

Thanks for your reply. I sure wish it were that simple but no....that is not the problem. I'm an advanced PS user and know the workings of a computer well. I've been through every imagineable possibility and now am wondering if my video card isn't up to the task of redrawing the brush strokes on huge files. I'm grasping at straws.
Thanks anyway.

Scale a Paint's "path" without distorting the Brush "strokes"?

Anyway to scale a Paint Brush "stroke's" "path" along only one axis without distorting the brush strokes?

Besides having no idea what you're trying to say, I don't think you're considering the problem.
Here's the same issue, solved with regards lines and their strokes distorting:
scale a line, not it's outline/stroke...
That's a particularly cool trick.
But I don't see anything similarly possible with Paint Brush based "strokes".
Please, consider that this is what I'm "painting" the line with, so I'd like the circles (dots) to not distort into ovals when scaling the path in only one dimension, see my answer at bottom:
Small Circles (dots) on a path instead of dashes?

Wacom Wireless random brush strokes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for