Waiting for the previously running task to complete issue

I am running the full extract process , and one task SDE_ORA_InventoryProductDimension running for 18 hours and its status is "Waiting for the previously running task to complete"
but all running tasked are completed and left tasks are queued by this task, so what make this issue happen?
I restart the informatica server and the task running now!
but for this task I run before it has ten million records , and it always make the dataware house server's cache full and server down,
so how to handle this problem?
Edited by: Yu Yang on Apr 16, 2013 4:58 AM

Check if /*+ FULL(PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F) */ hint existed in the SDE_ORA_INVENTORYPRODUCTDIMENSION_FULL mapping Source qualifier?.
I suggest you to raise an SR and check with your DBA's if they can do something to improve the Performance.
Mark helpfull if it helps.
Regards,
Veeresh Rayan

Similar Messages

Please wait for the group policy client - shutting down issues

Hi
I have issues with shutting down machines. When machine is connected to company's LAN everything works fine. However, if machine is connected to VPN - Juniper NC - 1 hour or more it always hangs when it is shutting down. When I shut down the machine
(verbose mode on), first stage is:
Please wait for the system Event Notification service.
This ends exactly
after 3 minutes. Next stage:
Please wait for the group policy client windows 7
...is never timed out (even after few hours). Machine never shuts down.
In Application logs there are always these 4 events when machine is unsuccessfully shutting down:
6005: The winlogon notification subscriber <Sens> is taking long time to handle the notification event (Logoff).
4627: The COM+ Event System timed out attempting to fire the Logoff method on event class {D5978650-5B9F-11D1-8DD2-00AA004ABD5E} for publisher and subscriber . The subscriber failed to respond within 180 seconds.
The display name of the subscription is "ISensLogon2". The HRESULT was 80010002.
6006: The winlogon notification subscriber <Sens> took 180 second(s) to handle the notification event (Logoff).
6005: The winlogon notification subscriber <GPClient> is taking long time to handle the notification event (Logoff).
Sens is timed out after 3 minutes while there is no 6006 event for GPClient and machine is stuck there for ages (Please wait for the group policy client
stage). I noticed in System logs that machine always hangs if there is this error
5783: The session setup to the Windows NT or Windows 2000 Domain Controller \\server for the domain X is not responsive. The current RPC call from Netlogon on \\machine to \\server has been cancelled.
I made a group policy log and below you can see part of GPSVC log when machine is unsuccessfully shutting down:
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0xe58
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Canceling pending calls
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x71a
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Cancelled pending calls
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Exiting with dwStatus = 0x0
GPSVC(438.1a04) 21:31:24:327 Waiting for user group policy thread to terminate.
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0xe10
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Canceling pending calls
GPSVC(218.c88) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x525
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x71a
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Cancelled pending calls
GPSVC(2d4.9c8) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0xdcc
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0x20cc
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(2d4.9c8) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0xd90
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Exiting with dwStatus = 0x0
GPSVC(218.d48) 21:31:24:342 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x525
GPSVC(218.d48) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC(218.1c04) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x525
GPSVC(218.1c04) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Exiting with dwStatus = 0x0
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0x2100
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Exiting with dwStatus = 0x0
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0x1264
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Exiting with dwStatus = 0x0
I tried with signing out from VPN before shutting down machine, I even switched off WiFi but machine still hung. If i tried to get GP results before shutting down machine it takes ages and it is stuck in "Getting the user name" stage.
Gpupdate /force never updates policy (It stops at Updating Policy...). I tired with installing different hotfixes which did not resolve the issue. I never have any
issues with logging in, no GP scripts are applied when user is logging off or on, no roaming profiles. The only issue is when machine needs to be shut down.
I excluded 1 machine from GP and left it on VPN for a few hours, several times. It always shuts down successfully. I applied GP back one by one and the one which is presumably causing an issue is Avecto which adds admin rights when VPN application
starts (event 100):
Process started with admin rights added to token.
Command Line: "C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\Juniper Networks\Setup Client\JuniperSetupClient.exe"
Process Id: 5540
Parent Process Id: 2252
Policy: EA-PrivilegeGuardSettings.UK Policy
Application Group: EA-PrivilegeGuardSettings.Applications Granted Admin Rights
Reason: <None>
File Name: c:\users\User\appdata\roaming\juniper networks\setup client\junipersetupclient.exe
Hash: 27D8463A913A802E555AEEF45717B122249AA993
Certificate: Juniper Networks, Inc.
Description: Juniper Setup Client
Application Type: exe
Product Name: Juniper Setup Client
Product Code: <None>
Upgrade Code: <None>
Product Version: 8.0.6.48695
I guess there is a DNS issues when machine is on VPN which leads that GP cannot be applied / updated. Not sure if or why Avecto would have an impact on this. When machine is trying to shut down it still somehow thinks it is connected to DC. What
I also noticed are several explorer crashes while machine is on VPN.
Does anyone have same issues? All machines are Dell with Juniper NC (VPN).
Thanks,

Hi,
According to event log, Winlogon process takes a long time to handle logoff event. That's to say winlogon process is waiting for response to logoff.
According to your description after, this problem is most probably caused by Avecto. You can try to disable or uninstall it temporarily for test.
To make further troubleshoot with this problem, you can try to use WPT (Windows Performance Tool) to make troubleshoot.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2013/03/22/troubleshooting-windows-performance-issues-using-the-windows-performance-recorder.aspx
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

On iphoto, my import was interrupted and now I can't exit or re-import my photos because it says that I need to wait for the previous import to finish. How can I fix that?

As I was Importing, it kept freezing, so I unplugged my phone and now I can't exit or do anything on iPhoto because I have to wait for my non existent download to finish.

Apple menu ==> force quit
LN

Yammer Directory Sync - Waiting for previously running sync to complete

We setup Yammer Directory Sync and after the initial testing we added just one user to synchronise however this user never appears in Yammer - The service log file indicates "Waiting for previously running sync to complete" - When we look in the
Yammer system we see that the last sync was when we initially setup the Yammer Directory Sync
Thanks for enabling Directory Sync
The Yammer Directory Sync utility has been enabled for your network. The last successful sync was at 04-29-2015 12:38 PM"
Is there somewhere or somehow we can have the Yammer Directory Sync realise that there is no previous sync running

Yes, I have the same issue here. Even thought that itunes match is switched off on both of my devices, they still see the music in cloud.
I have also tried to delete everything from itunes match to start over by creating new itunes library, loading itunes match and deleting everything, including playlists (normal ones as well as problemtic empty ones). Musis should be already deleted (my imac as well as macbook pro do not see any music now), but playlists are still there....
I am already in contant with apple support, so let's wait what she will come with. The worst thing is that I can not simply try restore, because I can not make a backup...

I ordered a battery for my laptop because it said to replace battery soon. How long can I let the new battery sit around as I wait for the old one to run out of more charge?

I ordered a battery for my laptop because it said to replace battery soon. How long can I let the new battery sit around as I wait for the old one to run out of more charge? Will the new one become less effective if it sits around too long?

How much capacity is remaining on your current battery?
Check your power status
From the  menu: Hold OPTION and click System Information... èHardware è Power
Copy and Paste in your reply.
The new battery will become less effective if you store it in a hot or humid environment. It should be stored at room temperature (22 C).
Long term storage (6 months):
Apple recommends that you store the battery with a 50% charge. If you store a battery when it’s fully discharged, it could fall into a deep discharge state, which renders it incapable of holding any charge. Conversely, if you store it fully charged for an extended period of time, the battery may experience some loss of battery capacity, meaning it will have a shorter life.
http://www.apple.com/batteries/

Posting an unplanned depreciation run for the previous period

Hi SDN forum,
May I just ask if it's possible to run an unplanned posting run for a previous period wherein the depreciation run has already been executed?
The scenario is more like a "repeat unplanned posting run"
I can't seem to include this unplanned depreciation whenever I select the repeat run for the previous period.
Please help.
Thanks

Hi
Through T.Code: ABAA you can able to post unplanned dep for previous period.
Executing AFAB for previous
1 - open FI Periods (OB52)
2 - Post Unplanned Dep T.Code: ABAA
3 - Run AFAB with Repeet run & Test run
you feel it is ok with test run execute production run
Regards
Viswa

I had to replace the hard drive on my computer. I am now trying to download Adobe Photoshop CS6, previously purchased. I get an error that files are missing after waiting for the whole download. I have Windows7

I had to replace the hard drive on my computer. I am now trying to download Adobe Photoshop CS6, previously purchased. I get an error that files are missing after waiting for the whole download. I have Windows7

The error msg said that the file archive part of Adobe photoshop CS6 is missing and that I need all parts in the same folder.

I tried to import 2 photos from an email. The photos are now on iPhoto, however, when I try to close iPhoto or turn off my computer, I get a notice that says, "Photos are being imported to the photo library. Please wait for the import to complete."

I tried to import 2 photos from an email to iphoto. The photos now appear in iphoto as the latest imports, However, when I try to close iphoto or log off of my computer, I get a message box that says, " Photos are being imported to the photo library. Please wait for the import to complete."
I can't get out of iphoto or log off of my computer, or turn the computer off. How do I stop the import or log out of iphoto???

Try Force-quit from the Apple-menu to close iPhoto.

I have an ipad 4 running ios 7 but i noticed ios 7 on my ipad seems laggy. I already did a factory reset but it seems doesn't change a bit. Are there any solution for this or I need to wait for the next ios 7 update?

Am I the only one who facing this problem or there someone else. I did a factory reset yesterday but it still laggy. Do I need to wait for the next ios 7 update or what?

Hi Amish,
I should have mentioned that I have signed out of the iCloud Control Panel several times and no syncing occurs.
Thanks for your response anyway. I appreciate your feedback.

Had desktop Mac Pro set up with recent operating system there is a message that say setting up your Mac on the screen do I have to wait for the this process to complete or is there a way out of this screen?

I took all of my devices in to the apple store in ridge hill in Yonkers, the rep helped me set up the new operating system on all my
Devices from my phone to my desk top tower at home. I powered up my desk top this morning and a message came up saying that
The system did not recognize a program that was not compatible with the new operating system and it went right into "Setting up your Mac"
Mode. Do I have to wait for the setup or is there a way to by pass this process?
Dee Brown

I think maybe wait for a bit. Usually, on startup and installing the new OS, the assumption is that the user might not know too much, and that compatibility must be checked, which may be helpful, or not. For now, I'd say ignore it, wait until it's done its thing, then update the program that's not compatible. If you can, Mr. Brown, find out which one isn't "making nice" with Mavericks. Hopefully it'll give you a name
John b

E61 sync problem: 'Waiting for the mobile phone to...

Setup: Nokia E61 Windows XP Pro w/Service Pack 2 PC Suite 6.80.53.3 Nokia supplied cable.
The body of this has been essentially copied from two other people who've had the same problem. One's problem spontaneously disappeared while the other's was solved by removing the phone's battery for a minute. My problem was not solved by that and I throw it to the group for its collective wisdom.
I have successfully synchronised my Outlook Contacts & Calendar for over a week. Now I can't. On selecting Synchronise Now in the Nokia PC Sync dialog, the blue & green bubbles continue to rotate and the message 'Connecting to E61'continues to flash for some 5 mins. The message then changes to 'Waiting for the mobile phone to send data'. This continues for approx. 3 mins, where upon synchronisation stops and the message Synchronisation Completed appears. However, 0 entries have been updated, despite several updates to contacts. Previously, having pressed the Synchronise Now button, synchronisation would take typically less than a minute and all updates would be transferred OK. I have tried everything I can think of. Included, completely de-pairing the phone from the PC, uninstalling PC Suite, installing again from scratch and re-establishing the connection. The other functions in PC Suite seem to be fine. For example, I can use the file manager to see what's on my phone. At the bottom of the PC Suite page it says that my phone is connected via USB. At the task bar at the bottom of the Windows screen it also shows everything OK. The icon there says"Nokia PC Suite Nokia E61 conected via USB". It's only when I press the synchronize button on PC Suite that the next screen pops up and says that it's trying to connect. Any suggestions to this vexing problem?

try recreating the sync settings from PC Sync, select settings - create bew settings - and run through the wizard. then sync

[Solved] systemd does not wait for the unit to finish

My problem is described in the title. I have made a test by enabling the following unit:
[Unit]
Description=/etc/rc.local Compatibility
[Service]
Type=forking
ExecStart=/bin/sleep 1000
TimeoutSec=0
RemainAfterExit=yes
After=network.target
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
The unit is well started (a process sleep 1000 exists). But with a type=forking, systemd is supposed to hang in this case. Instead, the graphical.target is launched, systemctl list-units mention it as dead, but the display manager is started before the sleep 1000 completes. Ho can I force systemd to wait?
Last edited by olive (2015-03-16 16:49:34)

olive, now you're making even less sense. I didn't say the sleep example was stupid and I didn't question your reasons for doing/wanting this.
I suggested you add "Before=display-manager.service" and you respond "I added Before=graphical.target and it didn't change anything."
I also tried to explain why systemd has no reason to delay the display-manager.service. You could have asked for further clarification, as berbae has now done. Let's try a longer explanation.
Service startup
Services can be started in different ways, as configured with Type=. This determines when a service is considered "started" (or when the service's start-up is considered finished). When a service reaches this state (some time after being started), units that are supposed to start After= this service will be started (and no sooner).
With simple systemd has no further information about the start-up process. It launches whatever you specify in ExecStart and this is the main process that continues to run till the service stops. systemd assumes this type of service is started immediately. All the other types have some way for the process to indicate to systemd (either directly or indirectly) when it has finished starting.
Actually oneshot is also a bit special and that is where RemainAfterExit comes in. For oneshot, systemd waits for the process to exit before it starts any follow-up units (and with multiple ExecStarts I assume it waits for all of them). So that automatically leads to the scheme in berbae's last post. However, with RemainAfterExit, the unit remains active even though the process has exited, so this makes it look more like "normal" service with
begin of unit/startup ---- end of startup ------ end of unit
This is the relevant behavior for this thread. First sleep starts, then after 1000 seconds, start-up finishes and follow-up units will be started. Then either the unit dies, or (with RemainAfterExit) it stays "active".
The man page describes how "end of startup" is determined for each Type.
Targets
Targets are meant to group units together, to provide synchronization points (and replace runlevels). When you start a target, all its units will be started (in parallel if possible). The man page says:
Unless DefaultDependencies= is set to false, target units will
implicitly complement all configured dependencies of type Wants=,
Requires=, RequiresOverridable= with dependencies of type After= if the
units in question also have DefaultDependencies=true.
This means that (by default) when a target is requested, all it units are started first. Only after all units have finished starting, the target itself will be started (and since the target doesn't do anything by itself, this startup is basically instantaneous). Without this dependency, the order between the target and its units is unspecified, so in theory the target could finish starting immediately while its units are still being started.
Back to olive
graphical.target has these DefaultDependencies, so it is not started until all its units (like display-manager.service) and other After= dependencies (like multi-user.target) have finished starting. Your sleep service has to be started before multi-user.target starts (again due to default target dependencies). So first display-manager and the sleep service are started and after 1000 seconds, the sleep service finishes starting and then (assuming all other dependencies were quicker) multi-user.target is started and graphical.target as well (assuming display-manager didn't need 1000 seconds).
If you want display-manager.service after the sleep service, add a Before/After line to specify that (this was your original goal and my suggestion).
olive wrote wrote:However, units that are parts of the graphical target are still launched before the graphical target become active. I am still unable to completely delay the starts of the graphical target before a specific unit completes.
It should be clear now how this works. "units that are part of the graphical target" can only mean "units that are wanted/required by the graphical target" but that is basically all the units that are started when you boot your system, because multi-user.target is a part of graphical.target. And your sleep service is a part of multi-user.target, so in fact you're saying you want to delay starting the sleep service until the sleep service completes
What you probably intended was to delay all units that are a part of graphical.target but not of multi-user.target until after the sleep service. I can't think of an easy (or even good) way to do this and this post is already too long, so I'll table that for now.

Should You Buy An iPhone Now, Or Wait For The Next One?

Great article by HuffPost Tech.
The most common thing I get asked whenever I tell anyone I'm a tech writer is some version of the question: "Should I get a new iPhone now, or should I wait until the next one comes out?" It is as though my business card should read not "Technology Writer," and instead "iPhone Psychic"
Not that I am not happy to prognosticate! And in that spirit, here's a look at the questions on everyone's mind: Should I buy an iPhone now? And if not now, when?
First, let me say that I am fascinated by the peculiar kind of panic that I encounter in people I meet who are deciding on a purchase date for their next Apple phone. I call it the iSenberg Uncertainty Principle: Potential iPhone buyers exist in a constant state of anxiety, perpetually worrying that purchasing an iPhone on any given day will mean that they will miss out on the inevitably cooler version with the mind-blowing new features soon down the road. The Cupertino Sword of Damocles constantly dangles over their heads, threatening to pierce them with unhipness and iShame.
Here is one solid piece of advice I can offer to help you avoid the Sword: Do not buy any new iPhone until September. Apple has an annual media conference each September, and every blog with the word 'Mac' in the title is reporting that Steve Jobs is going to do his black turtleneck thing and introduce some kind of new iPhone there. The September Media conference is generally used to present the new iPods, but as All Things Digital reports, Apple plans to "commandeer" the conference for its official iPhone announcement.
Apple is long overdue to release its new iPhone anyway, if history is any indication. Look at this handy little timeline:
June 2007: original iPhone released
June 2008: iPhone 3G released
June 2009: iPhone 3Gs released
June 2010: iPhone 4 released
June 2011: Nothing!
In other words, the 5th generation iPhone is already a month late, so it makes sense that the rumors are swirling. Apple's tardiness can be explained by the fact they've actually already released two iPhones in 2011 -- the Verizon iPhone in February and the unlocked iPhone 4 in June. Their schedule is all screwy, like a traveler trying to get over jet lag. But all signs point to them getting right with a September Apple iPhone release.
So what jaw-dropping new feature will this iPhone boast? We're hearing that the "iPhone 4S," as it is rumored to be called, won't be the dramatic re-imagining that many of us have come to expect with each new iPhone release. Tech blogThis Is My Next thinks that it will be thinner and lighter, and that it will run on a new chip; the New York Times thinks that it will be the same dimensions as the iPhone 4 but that it will be cheaper. Bloomberg agrees with This Is My Next on the chip and adds that the rear-facing camera will upgrade to 8 megapixels from 5 megapixels.
Now, even if you're just a normal, non-geek iPhone user, who doesn't care if the rear-facing camera doubles its megapixel count, or if Apple has changed the manufacturer of its data processors, or whatever, you still need to at least wait for the alleged iPhone announcement, and here's why: if history is any indicator, the introduction of a newer iPhone model is accompanied by a drop in price of older iPhone models. When the iPhone 3GS was announced, the price of the iPhone 3G dropped by $100; when the iPhone 4 was announced, the price of an iPhone 3GS also dropped by $100. Even if you know that you're not going to drop $400 on whatever iPhone Apple begins peddling in September, there is no sense in paying more money for an iPhone 4 or 3Gs now when the base price of both seem like locks to drop in two months.
But before we start fantasizing, how can we be so certain that Jobs is even going to announce an iPhone in September if Apple hasn't so much as indicated such a thing? How do we know that all of these rumors weren't just started by lonely nerds like me and my co-workers emailing each other from our mother's basements, inciting iPhone rumors all on our own?
Well, first of all, I don't live with my mother; and second of all, the new iPhone rumors have sprung forth from two reliable sources held in high journalistic regard.
The first is esteemed, award-winning tech journalist John Paczkowski of All Things Digital, who blazed iPhone prognostication trails by predicting back in April that an updated iPhone 4 would be unveiled at the September Apple music Conference and has steadfastly maintained the claim is true through June and into July. In fact, he confirmed as recently as July 5 that a shiny new iPhone looked to be in the early stages of supply chain production, and that people close to the company still believe that the new iPhone would be ready for the Jobs treatment in September.
So there is Reliable Source One.
Reliable Source Number Two is the Wall Street Journal, not exactly a one-laptop operation. The paper gives "the end of September" as a target launch date, which squares up with both Paczkowski's prediction of a September announcement and release. This doesn't even mention This Is My Next's separate prediction of a September release, nor 9to5Mac reporting that there are going to be two new iPhones in September, one low-end and high-end. But now we're falling down the rabbit hole and into the basement again, so let's focus:
There is likely to be a new iPhone in September. It will likely affect the price of all the other iPhones. The iPhones available now -- the iPhone 4 and the iPhone 3Gs -- will probably be cheaper in two months. Unless you drop your current iPhone in a pool, a bathtub or a volcano, do not buy an iPhone until Steve Jobs opens his beautiful brilliant mouth at the Apple conference in early September. When the post-turtleneckian dust settles, we'll have a clearer picture of whether or not this rumored new iPhone is worth the money. And then we can talk about--well, whether or not you should buy an iPhone now, or wait until the next one comes out.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/12/iphone-release-5-september_n_896345.html

Apple has two prototypes out testing now. One is a thinner totally redesigned case. The problem with it is that Foxconn can't seem to build it. Hence the delay. The other prototype uses the existing case, but with updated (read dual core) internals. If they can get production up by September the first phone will be released and will be the iPhone 5. If they cannot, then the second prototype will be released as the iPhone 4GS.

I have two hard drives on my mac 10.5.8 power pc and hear the clickking sounds of the first hard drive and think that it may be dying, can I install everything on the other hard drive also and wait for the first drvie to die before i use the other drives

I have two hard drives on my mac 10.5.8 power pc and hear the clickking sounds of the first hard drive and think that it may be dying, can I install everything on the other hard drive also and wait for the first drive to die before i use the other drives? Or, what is the best way to handle this?

I do not know what you are waiting for.
I'd make a backup of your important stuff before cloning the entire disk.
Carbon Copy Cloner will copy your startup drive to an external firewire drive. You can boot from the external drive to verify that you have a good clone. When you upgrade your existing startup drive, you can at any time boot from your external drive and go back to your existing system.
http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html
SuperDuper is the wildly acclaimed program that makes recovery painless, because it makes creating a fully bootable backup painless. Its incredibly clear, friendly interface is understandable, easy to use, and SuperDuper's built-in scheduler makes it trivial to back up automatically. And it runs beautifully on both Intel and Power PC Macs!

F110 Error Specify a lot number for the production run Message no.FS546

Hello Experts,
I am doing F110 Automatic payment Program.
All stpes i had done , but Click to start the payment run.
System give me error,
Specify a lot number for the production run
Message no.FS546
For that I had maintained T code FHCI
Maintain Check lot , But system can not pick check lot.
And Maintained Variant in that tab where we can give you House Bank , I'd , Check lot number (But it can not save)
Please tell me what should i do ?
Waiting for reply.
Regards,
Jemes

Sir
No sir check lot is not there.
Can you tell me in Varaint Field which field i have to fill.
Program run date:25.09.2009
Identification feature:P5
Paying company code:1000
Sending company code:1000
Payment method: C
Pmt meth. supplement:
Business Area:
House Bank: STD01
Account ID: STD01
Check lot number: 0
(Check Lot No. is not save inthis field)
Restart from Check Number:
Currency: INR
Payment document no.:
Print Control
Print Check:Tick
Print pay advice note:
no form summerysection :Tick
Do not Void any check:Tick
Please suggest what chnages i do ?
wating for reply.
regards,
Jemes
Edited by: Jemes on Sep 25, 2009 10:41 AM
Edited by: Jemes on Sep 25, 2009 10:47 AM

Waiting for the previously running task to complete issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for