Warning in DB13 Check DB "BR0970W Database administration alert"
Hi
We have an alert message in DB13 when we check the checkdb log. Log details are as below
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: WARNING, type: CRITICAL_FILE, object: /oracle/EPR/sapdata10/btabd_11/btabd.data11, value: (max_size) 30466040 KB (> 29439485 KB)
This warning is for all the datafiles; I did just give the sample log above.
Can you please suggest and help resolving this issue?
Thanks in advance.
Hi,
The issue here is that there is no enough disk space for the datafiles to extend. In this case you can turn off the auto extend or Increase the disk space of sapdata10 or decrease the max_size or you can move some of the datafiles to other directory or filesystem.
You can turn off the auto extend while the database is online. After turning off the auto extend, you need to monitor the datafile/tablespace size periodically.
Regards,
Varadhu
Similar Messages
-
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATIST
Dear all,
We have recently migrated 4.6c/oracle9i/solaris 6800 5.8 to 4.6c/oracle10g/HPUX11.23
After the migration everything was succesfull. Except the below error, when I run a dbcheck from db13.
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: FILE_OFFLINE, object: /oracle/DV2/mirrlogA/log_g1m2.dbf
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: FILE_OFFLINE, object: /oracle/DV2/mirrlogB/log_g2m2.dbf
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: FILE_OFFLINE, object: /oracle/DV2/mirrlogA/log_g3m2.dbf
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: FILE_OFFLINE, object: /oracle/DV2/mirrlogB/log_g4m2.dbf
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.APQD
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.APQI
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.ARFCRSTATE
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.ARFCSDATA
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.ARFCSSTATE
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.ATAB
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.CDCLS
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.COIX
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.COIX_DATA40
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DBTABLOG
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DDLOG
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DDNTF
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DDNTT
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DDXTF
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DDXTT
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.EPIDXB
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.EPIDXC
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.GLSP
Can anyone help us to overcome the above issue
Regards
SenthilThank you Warren. I shall do that reply to you.
Also I have received the below error messages
oracle9i/solaris 6800 5.d to 4.6c(Kernel46D)/oracle10g/hpux11.23.
Everything works fine except the below Three errors:
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: FILE_OFFLINE, object: /oracle/DV2/mirrlogA/log_g3m2.dbf
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: WARNING, type: IN_WRONG_TABLESPACE, object: (table) SAPR3.APQD, value: PSAPAPQDD
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: ERROR, parameter: LOG_ARCHIVE_START, value: FALSE (<> TRUE)
Can you help
Regards
Senthil -
BR0970W Database administration alert
I get this error in DB13 in CheckDB, .
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: MISSING_INDEX, object: (table) SAPCRM.VCSMONITOR
Please suggest the fix for this.
Thanks
ShajiHi Markus,
Thanks for your reply.
I checked in SE14, the table VCSMONITOR is Transparent table and the Status is "Not Actve" (Exists in the database).
List of all indexes (constraints) of the table
Index name Unique Short description
0 X Primary index
There are no secondary indexes
Checked for this table/objec in ECC/SRM/BW systems, in SE14 it reports as "object does not exist".
Could you guide me further please.
Regards
Shaji -
DB13 Check, Oracle BR0973W Database operation alert warning
Dear all master and Gurus,
when i run check DB process on DB13 it was completed with following errors. i've serched over googling, SDN, and others but couldnt get any exact answer.
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: aeghclvm.dsv, time: 2011-07-09 13.35.38, condition: Last successful 'dsv' operation older than 10 days
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: beghcgas.afd, time: 2011-07-09 12.30.18, condition: Last successful 'afd' operation older than 10 days
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: beenppkm.aff, time: 2010-11-10 22.35.48, condition: Last successful 'aff' operation older than 10 days
What is the meaning of dsv, afd , and aff?
Should I ignore these warning?
How to resolve ?
Any advise is needed, Thanks
Gustria WekaHi
When a backup of database or archive log is triggered, it writes a log file and the extension is based on the type of backup executed
Names of the BRBACKUP Detail Logs
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/EN/0d/d30ec54a0c11d182b80000e829fbfe/content.htm
Names of the BRARCHIVE Detail Logs
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/EN/0d/d30ec54a0c11d182b80000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
SBK -
Hi
here i am posting the issue as below:
BR970W Database administration alert - level: WARNING, type: CRITICAL_SEGS, object: (table) SAPR3./BMC/YGR_AVAILAB, value: 640 K
as i checked with SAPDBA -f, i am getting an error
a - Tablespace: PSAPYBMCD
b - Log checks: no
c - Free space and fragmentation of all tablespaces
d - Check free space of objects in all tablespaces
e - Check free space of objects in tablespace PSAPYBMCD
f - Alter tablespace PSAPYBMCD add data/temp file
g - Drop tablespace PSAPYBMCD
h - Display all tablespaces and data/temp files
r - Display raw device drivers in /dev
q - Return
Please select ==> f
SAPDBA: Error getting file system space information of
'/oracle/sid/sapdata7'.
(Such entry does not exist.)
Press <return> to continue ...
as i checked.............
bdf | grep /oracle/sid
/oracle/SID/sapdata1
so my Q is how to change the filesystem to /oracle/SID/sapdata1 from sapdata7.
sap : 4.6c
oracle : 9.2.0.8.0
os : hp-ux
so can anyone help me in changing the filesystem path?
Thanks in advancesHi,
It seems that environment variable SAPDATA<n> are not comfiture properly?
But why dont use brspace?
e.g. +brspace f tsextend -t PSAPYBMCD -f SAPDATA1 -s <size>+
Nahum -
Dear all
I have install a quality server now is working perfectly
but when use the db 13 then when i excute the
1-check database.
2-check and update optimizer staitics
not excuted please guide , will we configre any location ?
thanks
with best regards
venkatHi,
which database you are using?
check following notes might helps you.
Note 1072066 - DBA Cockpit: New function for DB monitoring
Note 1027146 - Database administration and monitoring in the DBA Cockpit
if you are using SQL Server then check following notes.
Note 1027512 - MSSQL: DBA cockpit for basis release 7.00 and later
Note 1057855 - DB13/DBACOCKPIT database jobs fail after SP12
regards,
kaushal -
Oracle BR0973W Database operation alert warning
Hello experts,
I hope you can help me with the following:
In transaction DB13 the checkdb job reports the following errors:
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: sdvgirhz.dbp, time: 2007-05-14 15.46.27, condition: Last 'dbp' operation failed with rc = 4
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: sduxubpz.tse, time: 2007-03-30 08.58.27, condition: Last 'tse' operation failed with rc = 4
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: sduxuaou.dfa, time: 2007-03-30 08.46.40, condition: Last 'dfa' operation failed with rc = 2
I would like to get rid of these messages in dbcheck but can't figure out how to do it.
I searched the notes database, google and this forum and still couldn't find an answer.
Some data regarding oracle and sap versions:
SAP_ABA 700 0009 SAPKA70009 Cross-Application Component
SAP_BASIS 700 0009 SAPKB70009 SAP Basis Component
PI_BASIS 2005_1_700 0006 SAPKIPYJ76 PI_BASIS 2005_1_700
ST-PI 2005_1_700 0003 SAPKITLQI3 SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
SAP_BW 700 0006 SAPKW70006 SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0
SAP_AP 700 0003 SAPKNA7003 SAP Application Platform
BBPCRM 500 0003 SAPKU50003 BBPCRM
ST-A/PI 01I_CRM500 0000 - Application Servicetools for CRM 500
Database system ORACLE
Release 10.2.0.2.0
Thanks in advance for helping.
Regards
Dirk Visserthe operations mentioned were not succesfully done...check the corresponding logfiles
-> dbp = alter database parameter (brspace)
-> tse = extend tablespace (brspace)
-> dfa = alter data file (brspace)
GreetZ, AH -
Dear SAP Gurus,
We are getting the following error in Check Database in DB13
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: LOG_BUFFER, value: 14254080 (>< 4096,512 KB)
The current Parameter : 14254080
We have change the parameter as per SAP Note#830576, still the same error is comming.
Kinldy Help.
Thanks in advance.Hi Vijay,
Are you trying to change log_buffer to a smaller size and you can't? If you on Oracle 10g, you won't be able to reduce log_buffer as according to Oracle Metalink 351857.1, "The Log_buffer Default Size Cannot Be Reduced In 10g R2".
If you are concern about the warning in DB13, go to txn DB17 to change the condition will help to get rid of the warning.
Regards,
Annie -
Dear all:
Running the CheckDB in the transaction DB13 and i get the following
message of error:
"BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: DB_BLOCK_CHECKSUM, value: TRUE (<> FALSE)"
Other Details :-
OS :- Win 2003 server
DB :- Oracle 10g
So please help on this issue.
Thanks.
RegardsHi,
Oracle allows customers to use advanced block checking features to enable a higher protection against hardware and software problems.
Also with block checking/checksum turned on, it is absolutely necessary to verify your database. Enabling this feature will only find blocks which are touched (read into the SGA).
Advanced block checking can be enabled by setting either
db_block_checksum = true
or
db_block_checking = true
The reason for this warning is given in the following SAP Note 923919 - Advanced Oracle block checking features
Default recommended by SAP is TRUE.
If this information is helpful please reward points.
Regards,
Suhas -
BR0973W Database operation alert in DB13 - XI Production
Dear All
I am getting following error on DB13 on our XI Prd system..i serch ove the web & SDN but couldnt get any valid reason for this ..can some one assist me in resolving this warning ..
"BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: sechrknv.dfa, time: 2010-01-08 11.33.19, condition: Last successful 'dfa' operat
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: secehvio.tse, time: 2009-12-21 15.56.50, condition: Last 'tse' operation failed
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: secdecqf.tse, time: 2009-12-15 14.51.01, condition: Last successful 'tse' operat"
Regards
BuddhikeHi,
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: sechrknv.dfa, time: 2010-01-08 11.33.19, condition: Last successful 'dfa' operat
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: secdecqf.tse, time: 2009-12-15 14.51.01, condition: Last successful 'tse' operat"
You are getting some warning messages for different functions which are already performed.
such as,
dfa Alter data file
tse Extend tablespace
which are done by BRSPACE program.
You can ignore these warnigns.
If you check trx DB14, click 'Function ID's you will see where each one comes from.
Run, Clean Up Logs Job from DB13.
And Please Weekly Schedule/Run DB13 T-Code and Run Job - Clean Up Logs.
Using the cleanup parameters in the Initialization Profile init<DBSID>.sap you can determine how old the objects are before they are deleted.
The check conditions are specified in the control table DBCHECKORA. You can change these with transaction DB17
Regards,
Bhavik G. Shroff -
Hi Gurus,
I made some changes in rz10 for client copy like:
icm/host_name_full [email protected]
login/accept_sso2_ticket 1
login/create_sso2_ticket 2
icm/server_port_1
PROT=HTTPS,PORT=443$$,PROCTIMEOUT=600,TIMEOUT=600
icm/server_port_0
PROT=HTTP,PORT=80$$,PROCTIMEOUT=600,TIMEOUT=600
login/no_automatic_user_sapstar 0
After to make changes effective, i stopsap & startsap.
But unfortunately db is not coming up. I checked startdb.log it showing
error as " ASE instance not available
*** ERROR:ASE instance possibly left running when system
went down(system crash?).
Notify Database Administrator."
Please help us to resolve this issue, i have also added startdb.log for
your reference.
Regards,
PiyushHi Piyush,
Did you solved this issue.
We are facing the same issue and only this thread is there in SCN for this issue.
If you solved this issue,Kindly share the solution.
Thanks and Regards,
Mathan A -
Pre-requisite for lab setup for database administration track.
Hi, does anybody know what setup is required to participate in Lab for database administration track on Feb 11?
The code you have in the rules file looks like it is incorrect. PCon would not be defined automatically and would therefore return zero. I think what you are actually looking for is something like:
Call Hs.Con ("",HS.Node.PCon(""),"")
Note that you can determine if the consolidation rules are used from you metadata under AppSettings. Look for the setting called ConsolidationRules. If you set this to Y, it uses the rules under Sub Consolidate(), if you set it N, it will automatically consolidate even if you have nothing under Sub Consolidate().
Further, you can affect what gets consolidated in the metadata. Some of your accounts etc. may not be set correctly. Some things to check:
For Accounts, make sure that IsConsolidated is checked and the AccountType is correct
Also for Accounts, ensure that EnableCustom1Aggr ... is checked
Finally, if the Entities have different currencies, check if you are getting data up to [Parent Total]. If not, the problem is your translation and not your consolidation. -
New in DB2 database administration
Dear Friends,
I have installed ECC 6.0 with DB2 database , at SAP service started successfully. Also login possible. But i am new in DB2 database administration, so can you help me the list of DB2 command to check on OS level.
How listener start for DB2 database and so on.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
SachinHi Sachin,
DB2 LUW/UDB does not have a separate listener like Oracle.
You're not stating what OS you're running but the follow commands are useful no matter what OS(i.e. Windows or UNIX/Linux):
Check the patchlevel:
db2level
Start DB2:
db2start
Stop DB2:
db2stop
(You can add force as a parameter if you wish to shutdown it down more forcefully)
To list all the parameters for the DBM:
db2 get dbm cfg
To list all the DB parameters:
db2 get db cfg for db <SID>
Show progress of running backups etc
db2 list utilities show detail
I really would like to recommend the IBM online help for DB2:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/db2luw/v9r5/index.jsp
Regards,
Martin -
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: STATISTICS_LEVE
Hi,
While doing DBCheck one of my system i found this error
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: cdvkvbva.sta, time: 2007-06-07 06.05.02, condition: Last update optimizer stati
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 13165, time: 2007-06-07 22.53.58, message:
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 13184, time: 2007-06-07 22.55.23, message:
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 13203, time: 2007-06-07 22.57.35, message:
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 13590, time: 2007-06-08 00.09.04, message:
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: STATISTICS_LEVEL, value: TYPICAL (set in parameter file)
How to resolve please help what to check in DB17
Thanks
PunitBR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: cdvkvbva.sta, time: 2007-06-07 06.05.02, condition:
After seeing into file we found this error
BR0301E SQL error -20000 in thread 4 at location stats_tab_collect-18, SQL statement:
'BEGIN DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS (OWNNAME => '"SAPR3"', TABNAME => '"/BI0/0P00000025"', ESTIMATE_PERCENT => 10, METHOD_OPT => 'FOR ALL COL
ORA-20000: Unable to analyze TABLE "SAPR3"."/BI0/0P00000025", insufficient privileges or does not exist
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 13149
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 13179
ORA-06512: at line 1
BR0886E Checking/collecting statistics failed for table SAPR3./BI0/0P00000025
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 13165, time: 2007-06-07 22.53.58, message:
"checkpoint not complete" error
SAP 79341 - Checkpoint not complete
The note which you have suggested is not suited to my environment what are the other possibilities the above error i am facing in one of the server does there i any data loss
Thanks the 3 rd problem is solved
Punit -
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: OPTIMIZER_INDEX
Hai Experts
When I executes DBChek i am getting following error
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ, value: 20 (<= 20)
already checked the database parameter for OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ is 20,
Thanks in advance
KHSHello,
Please, read slowly the message you are getting:
K Hari Shankar wrote:
> BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ, value: 20 (<= 20)
Lets try to understand it.
1.- It is telling you that your parameter is currently set to 20 (and that is a correct value as per relevant SAP note that you have checked)
2.- it is telling you that the current value is lower or equal to a specified valued to be checked against (<=20)
so, what could be the "problem", your parameter setting is OK, and the check is telling you the true, but you do not want the "warning"
perhaps the check is not properly configured?
of course 0.o
it should be checking if the value is different than 20, not lower or equal to 20
therefore, you have to change the check
this is done with DB17, go to that transdaction and change the check (perhaps it is DB16, right now I'm not 100% sure which one is display and which one is for change)
Maybe you are looking for
-
I wish to migrate the software of my operating system into my raid disk array
I have not found anything from Intel orMicrosoft software to migrate my operating system and I was told that there were a couple other companies to software to move my O.S. off the solid-state drive that it's on and put it on my RAID 5 array that's i
-
File-to-file --File adapter deployment
Hi all, When I'm trying to create communication chanel, unable to see File adapter. How to check whether file adapter was deployed are not. Regards, venu
-
Gathering all possible IDs for rights?
Hello, I am working with BOBJ security for a few objects in my environment and see there is an ID assigned to every possible right that can be granted within BOE. (i.e. - "Add objects to the folder" = 1, "View Objects" = 3, etc..) Moving beyond th
-
I don't know what version of Firefox I was using. I think it was 4.0 I have just downloaded the newest version 4.0.1 and will see if this continues or has been fixed. It has never done this while browsing with I. Explorer so I assume it to be a brows
-
Over-saturated colors in editor
I've been using PSE for years. Now suddenly with a new PC all the colors are oversaturated in the editor. Images that look fine in other programs (Faststone, Irfanview, Windows Photo Viewer) look terrible in PSE. They also look OK on my TV connected