WBS Issue

Dear Experts,
We have created Project PO with following taxes(VAT 5%, Excise Duty 10.3% and Freight)and simultaneously done the GRN for the same,but the issue is that when we are checking the budget in CJ33 only BasicExcise dutyFreight value is assigned but VAT amount is not reflecting in respective WBS element.
Kindly provide me with the solution.
Thanks
Sonal

hi
check whether that GL is created as cost element.

Similar Messages

CATS WBS Issue - Cpro

Hi All,
In CAT2 transaction, if I manually create a data entry by copying the wbs element from the worklist and save then if I execute the program "DPR_CATS_CPR_TRANSF" the confirmation time is reflected in the Cpro system.
But if I upload data through the zdevelopment (WBS element taken from the worklist ) and run the standard program the confirmation time is not reflected in the Cpro.
Please let me know what to be done to make the confirmation time reflect in Cpro???
The path in Cpro is select any task goto 'Additional Fields' tab you will find Confirmation time in confirmation area.
Thanks & Regards,
Moni.

Hi
Did you cehck table CATSDB?
Once you upload the data, check CATSDB, mostly the data is not there .
If there is a data then run CAT5 to transfer data to SAP PS.
If the data is not updated in CATSDB then you need to check report
Niranjan
Let me know if it works
Points welcome if useful

CATS WBS Issue - PS

Hi All,
In CAT2 transaction, if I manually create a data entry by copying the wbs element from the worklist and save then if I execute the program "DPR_CATS_CPR_TRANSF" the confirmation time is reflected in the PS system.
But if I upload data through the zdevelopment (WBS element taken from the worklist ) and run the standard program the confirmation time is not reflected in the PS.
Please let me know what to be done to make the confirmation time reflect in PS???
Thanks & Regards,
Moni.

Please refer page no 125 of this link.
If yo you are using network than you data flow would be like Table CATSDB> Table CATSPS>via running report RCATSTPS to --> Table AFRU.
If you are not using network than it would be Table CATSDB>Table CATSCO>via running report RCATSTCO to -->Table COBK.
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/CATS/CATS.pdf
Regards
Nitin P.

CATS WBS Issue

Hi All,
In CAT2 transaction, if I manually create a data entry by copying the wbs element from the worklist and save then if I execute the program "DPR_CATS_CPR_TRANSF" the confirmation time is reflected in the PS system.
But if I upload data through the zdevelopment (WBS element taken from the worklist ) and run the standard program the confirmation time is not reflected in the PS.
Please let me know what to be done to make the confirmation time reflect in PS???
Thanks & Regards,
Moni.

and you have already approved the catshours with cats_apprv_lite and set through with CAT9 ?
perhaps there is a difference in handling between those
kind regards
arthur
Edited by: A. de Smidt on Apr 2, 2009 1:15 PM

WBS Updates in R/3 not Key in BW

In R3, POSID can be changed without impact to the WBS in R3, but with great impact to the WBS in BW, which understands the new POSID as a new WBS element. Only a full delete/load of both the WBS Master Data and Transaction Data into BW will keep the BW and R3 WBS records in full sync. This is not practical in the BW Production environment. Also, it would not be known when a user changes the POSID in R3, so full loads would need to be done daily to insure that all changes are captured. Again, not practical in Production.
Although costs are often posted to Networks rather than to WBS elements, especially upper level WBS elements, roll-up of costs under a WBS is often a very common form of reporting in BW, especially for Project Managers. These WBS "roll-up" reports in BW would report costs on the previous POSID unless full replace of WBS Master and Transaction records were done between BW Report run times.
Has anyone else run into this problem? One recommendation would be to change the current process with custom development. The "lowest impact" options in my opinion would be:
Block the ability of the users to change the WBS POSID on the R3 side.
Change the BW WBS Primary key from POSID to a concatenation of POSID/PSPNR, and create a Rule during BW WBS Extraction to check if the POSID for an existing PSPNR has changed if yes, replace the POSID for the existing PSPNR with the new POSID name.
Any thoughts?

Here is a note from SAP on the WBS issue. According to Colm O'shea (SAP support) they are going to try and put a fix in the next plug-in upgrade.
New and extended interfaces for integrating SAP R/3, SAP R/3 Enterprise, and SAP ERP Central Component (SAP ECC) will no longer be delivered with their own add-on (SAP R/3 Plug-In). As of SAP ECC 6.0, they will be contained directly in SAP ECC.
PI 2004.1 is therefore the final separate delivered SAP R/3 Plug-In release.
This means that:
SAP ECC 6.0 and subsequent releases will automatically contain all integration interfaces that so far have been contained in the SAP R/3 Plug-In and that ensured the technical integration with other SAP Components.
Customers who run SAP R/3 4.6C, SAP R/3 Enterprise 47x100 and 47x200, and SAP ECC 5.0 will receive additional integration interfaces in a Support Package for PI 2004.1 once a year. The delivery of this Support Package will be synchronized with that of mySAP Business Suite. The 2005 delivery is in November as part of Support Package 10. Information about the delievery from 2006 onwards are take place here
This rule applies only for customers with a SAP R/3 Plug-In release PI 2004.1. Customers with PI 2003.1 or older must first upgrade to PI 2004.1 or SAP ECC 6.0.
No new interfaces will be provided for integration between new SAP component releases and SAP R/3 3.1I to 4.6B.
Number              739182
Version             2 vom 25.05.2004
Status              Released for Customer
Set on             ,25.05.2004
Language            EN
Mastersprache       DE
Short text          PSBW: Renaming PS objects
Responsible         SAP AG
Component           BW-BCT-PS
                    Project System
Long text
Symptom
In the project system, you can rename the following objects: project
definition, WBS element, network and network activity. In this case,
only the external identifier of the objects is changed. The internal
identifier (object number and Guid) is retained.
In the BW content of the PS, the external identifier of the objects is
stored in the cubes.
If the objects in the source system are now renamed, the reference of
the transaction data already loaded for this object disappears in BW,
since this refers to the old external identifier.
Other terms
PSBW, 0PS_C01, 0PS_C02, 0PS_C03, 0PS_C04
Reason and Prerequisites
This is due to a design problem.
Solution
Currently the only solution is to load master data and transaction data
again into BW.
You can use the following authorizations to prevent renaming of the
external identifier in the source system (in this case, activity '45' is
responsible for renaming the external identifier):
    o Project definition: C_PROJ_... authorization object
    o WBS element: C_PRPS_... authorization object

PEC in Investment Orders and WBS

Dear Experts ;
Why some of investment orders and WBS issue errors of two hundered pecrcent amounts to be posted to Asset Under Constructions in period end closing ? How to solve this problems ?
Thanks : VYN

Plan data for Statistical wbs elements are not eligible for assesments/distributions and settlements.
In actuals , orders can be set as senders and receivers. Use trans KCAU to customize yur assesments.
I hope it helps.
Pan

Budget Commitment Report - S_ALR_87013558

We have an issue with the Budget Commitment Report S_ALR_8701355 as explained below.
Org Structure:
A* Projects are separate small Projects to track Capital and Operating Expenses
But all the Capital Purchases are done only through C* WBS. And accordingly Capex budget is maintained only for C* WBS. So AWBS has been linked to 3 CWBS ( SW, HW & Dev SW) in one of the user field of C*WBS.
Shopping Cart will be raised using CWBS in SRM. But once PR has been created it replaces the account assignment field with AWBS. And later even the Asset posting happens only with A*WBS
Issue:
While using Budget Commitment Report - S_ALR_87013558, CWBS is giving Budget and A WBS is giving Actual cost. This Actual Cost pertains to 3 C* WBS Elements (SW, HW & Dev SW). So now Business requires to merge the cost of A* WBS with respective C*WBS Element.
We are able ascertain the cost of AWBS but not able find a logic to distribute this cost across respective C WBS.
Current Logic of the Program:
Any document posted using WBS Element will update table RSPCO with just Amount, Period & Value Type (Actual/ Budget / Plan) . So Budget Commitment Report S_ALR_87013558 will fetch the details from this table alone.
Could any of you please let us know how to deal with this problem without altering the existing Org structure .

Hi Rajesh,
I think the report is showing correctly as per the logic. But please elobrate us why the PR created with account assignment C* WBSE is replacing by A* WBSE.
If the account assignment in PR and PO is replacing by A* WBSE then obviously actual cost will book against A* WBSE and report S_ALR_8701355 will display the same.
you can post cost from AWBSE to C WBSE uisng KB15N.
Regards,
Nag.

Report for Req Material and Issue Material for Project/WBS

Dear All,
My client need a report for a WBS element-wise material required and material issue with value.
Let me know if any standard report avialble for same??
Or Incase of devlopment which are the tables we can use to Get req qty and issue qty of materials?
Thanks and Regards,
Atul R. Rajmane

Dear Shirkant,
Thanks for your input. I am using CN52N report.
I this I have selected Req Qty, Qty Received, Qty Withdrawn, Shortfall Qty. I am getting figures in Req Qty, Qty Withdrawn, Shortfall Qty but I am not able to get Qty Received figure. Let me know how I can get it i.e. for this any Note is required or any other configuration??
If I can get this figure than I can use this report for requirement.
Thanks and Regards,
Atul R. Rajmane

Unable to close the WBS element because of inventory issue

Hello
We are facing one issue where we are trying to close one WBS element but getting error that stock still exsists.
When i checked in table MSPR i found that for one of the material in the WBS element the physical inventory process is still not complete
Physical Inventory Blocking Indicator ,Indicator that specifies that the stock is blocked for a physical inventory has value A(Physical inventory not yet completed for amterial) in that table for one of the materials.
KIndly advice how to complete the proces and close the WBS.

Dear,
Check the links:
Physical inventory block in material master
Re: Physical Inventory & Goods movement process
Cycle count not counting correct number of items
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Issue in BAPI_PS_PRECOMMIT in mass creation of WBS Elements

Hi,
I am facing a issue with BAPI_PS_PRECOMMIT.
we have the following WBS Hierarchy:
S - Proj, (level1)
S-XXX WBS Element (level2)
S-XXX-001 WBS Element (level3)
I have created a program for mass creation of WBS elements creation
which uses the following BAPI's
BAPI_PS_INITIALIZATION
BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI
BAPI_PS_PRECOMMIT
BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT
The proj: 'S' and the level2 WBS element: 'S-XXX' already exist in the system.
When I run the program for delta load, so as to create the following level3 WBS elements:
S-XXX-001
S-XXX-002
S-XXX-003
The system is throwing the following errors at the BAPI_PS_PRECOMMIT:
1. Final Check of the project definition and WBS elements: Error
2. Validation unsuccessful
Pls help me on this.
Thanks,
Deepak

Check the WBS elements doesn't exist already in your system.
Here is what I coded some days back for deletion of Network Activities, most of the things are same.
You are doing for WBS element.
* Call to initialization BAPI Before Delete
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_INITIALIZATION'.
* Call to Network Activity Deletion BAPI
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUS2002_ACT_DELETE_MULTI'
        EXPORTING
          i_number           = t_bapi_activity-network
        TABLES
          it_delete_activity = l_t_del_vornr
          et_return = l_t_bapiret2.
      DELETE l_t_bapiret2 WHERE type <> 'E'.
      READ TABLE l_t_bapiret2 INDEX 1.
      IF sy-subrc EQ 0.                                      "If error in Deletion
        MOVE: f_idoc_contrl-docnum TO t_idoc_status-docnum,
              l_t_bapiret2-type TO t_idoc_status-msgty,
              'CNIF_PI' TO t_idoc_status-msgid,
              l_t_bapiret2-number TO t_idoc_status-msgno,
              l_t_bapiret2-message TO t_idoc_status-msgv1.
              MOVE c_idoc_status_error TO t_idoc_status-status.
              APPEND t_idoc_status.
              ROLLBACK WORK.
              EXIT.
      ELSE.                                                  "If Delete is successful COMMIT
* Call to PreCOMMIT BAPI
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_PRECOMMIT'
         TABLES
           ET_RETURN       = l_t_bapiret3.
* Call COMMIT BAPI
*        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
      ENDIF.
The other solution is use BAPI_PROJECT_MAINTAIN.

WBS derivation through FMDERIVE in goods issue

Hi all,
For a unique goods issue scenario, we are trying to derive the WBS element based on valuation class in a goods issue posting through the MB1A transaction. In the test mode of FMDERIVE and activating the 'trace' feature in FMDERIVE, the WBS element is being derived and populated in the WBS element field. However, when the goods issue is posted and the accounting document is viewed, the WBS element field is EMPTY. We have tried really hard to figure out what is going on, but to no avail.
In one of the other postings, I found reference to a function module (PSPNUM_EXTERN_TO_INTERN_CONV) that changes the wbs element from an external number to an internal number - I do not know how this works or what exactly this does. Furthermore, i dont see this function module in our list in fmderive. What we do have is FMDT_CONVERSION_WBS_INT_TO_EXT - can i use this instead? What does this do?
If i were to use this function module what would the source and target fields be?
Can one of you please help?
Are there any other ways to accomplish this? or is it a standard functionality that WBS element is not derived in a goods issue posting?
Please let me know.
PSM

Hi,
FMDERIVE is used for FM documents basically to derive FM assignment based on the FI/CO/LO attributes of the original document. You cannot use this functionality if you want to substitute the value in FI/CO documents. For this, use FI (OBBH) or CO (OKC9) substitutions.
Regards,
Eli

Issue in Updating Customer specific fields in WBS using BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI

Hi Experts,
I am able to create the WBS element using BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI.But the issue is i am not able to update customer specific fields even after passing the fields as per specification in Function module documentation. I have also created an implementation of BADI as per below specification in FM documentation:
Procedure for Filling Standard Enhancements
Before you call the BAPI for each object that is to be created or changed,
for which you want to enter customer-specific table enhancement fields, add a
data record to the container ExtensionIn:
STRUCTURE: Name of the corresponding help structure
VALUEPART1: Key of the object + start of the data part
VALUEPART2-4: If required, the continuation of the data part
VALUPART1 to VALUPART4 are therefore filled consecutively, first with the
keys that identify the table rows and then with the values of the
customer-specific fields. By structuring the container in this way, it is
possible to transfer its content with one MOVE command to the structure of the
BAPI table extension.
Note that when objects are changed, all fields of the enhancements are
overwritten (as opposed to the standard fields, where only those fields for
which the respective update indicator is set are changed). Therefore, even if
you only want to change one field, all the fields that you transfer in
ExtensionIn must be filled.
Checks and Further Processing
Using the methods ...CREATE_EXIT1 or. ...CHANGE_EXIT1 of the BAdI
BAPIEXT_BUS2001, BAPIEXT_BUS2002, and BAPIEXT_BUS2054, you can check the entered
values (and/or carry out other checks).
In the BAdI's second method, you can program that the data transferred to the
BAPI is processed further (if you only want to transfer the fields of the CI
includes, no more action is required here).
But still i am unable to update fields though i am able to create WBS with rest of the fields except custom fields.
I am using attached code to achieve this.Do we need to code anything inside method create_exit1 or create_exit2 implementation for BADI or
Please help on priority

Hi Rahul,
First observation from your code is that i could not find the assignment for the field
GWA_WBS_EXTIN-STRUCTURE. I hope you are not filling this field, that could be one reason for failure. Try to do it and let us know if you still have the problem.
Br..
Dwaraka

Issue on distribution of quantity to WBS elements in invoice

Hi SAP Gurus,
I have an issue with the distribution of quantity to WBS elemements in SAP.
There is a purchase order with 6 line items. For the first line item a quantity of 3 is ordered and the same quantity of 3 is assigned to 7 WBS elements in the account assignment tab. There were 3 invoices created for this line item. For a particular WBS element a quantity of 1.050 was assigned and when we drilled down through the 3 invoices we found only a quantity of 1.028 is assigned to this Particular WBS element. Can someone please tell me as to why this mismatch has happened.
Thanks in advance

Hi Raman,
I am sorry but this is not the case . There are 7 WBS elements used for this PO. The quantity is distributed to 7 wbs elements as follows.
                                      Percentage                    Quantity
1st WBS element-                 8.7                             0.261
2nd WBS element                 17.4                            0.522
3rd WBS element                  18.2                            0.546
4th WBS element                  8.8                             0.264
5th WBS element                   6.4                             0.192
6th WBS element                   5.5                             0.165
7th WBS element                   35                              1.050
This is the assigned structure in the PO for all the 7 WBS elements. But when you look into the 3 invoices a quantity of 1.028 has been distributed to 7th WBS element and a quantity of 0.214 has been assigned to 5th WBS element which is causing the mismatch
Also in the 2nd and 3rd invoices only 6 wbs elements are used. Can you please tell me as to why there is a WBS element missing in the 2nd and 3rd invoices if the splitting is happening automatically.
Regards,
Dwarik

Issue in settlement of sub orders to WBS Element

Hi Team,
Request your help in getting the below issue resolved:
Our client would like to have the sub order cost details to be settled to the superior order settlement reciever (In our case it is WBS). So we have changed the configuration in the Distribution rule in SPRO to "DIstribution Rule from Main Order". With this change the WBS Settlement receiver is getting populated automatically during release of the sub order. But when we are trying to do the settlement in KO88 we get a message that "Either the order is settled or there is nothing to settle". Please let us know incase of any setting being missed out.
Thanks for your help in advance
Regards.
Priya

by moving thread to forum http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/project-systems or http://scn.sap.com/community/eam may generate favourable replies.
Thanks
Ritesh

Issue with order or sequence of wbs elements appearance in planning layout

Hi Experts
we have an issue with order or sequence of wbs elements appearance in BPS planning layout.
In BW - 0wbs element - hierarchy order is as below
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
but when we check the same wbs element in BPS planning layout, it appears as below
1
2
3
4
6
7
5
8
Request you to advice how to correct the order.
Best Regards
krishna

Hi,
I came across a similar situation once. I dont remember exactly.
We have two different DataSources on wbs hierarchy. The hiearchy was loaded using the two datasources.
By mistake we were trying to use the hierarchy created by Datasource2, instead of hier created by datasource1.
Can you check that.

WBS Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for