WCS: Template Order in Config Group

Hello,
I'm trying to deploy a larger wireless lan installation using a WCS 7.0 with current controller versions.
Further I created configuration templates for deployment using a Config-Group.
The problem of the deployment with Config-Groups are apparently the order in which I run the templates. Some templates require the radio network or an SSID to be disabled for the template execution.
So what are my options here, when I want to change something in my radio policy or some parameters in an active SSID. A manual "disable"?
The wcs config-guide 7.0 says the following:
"The order of the templates is important when dealing with radio templates. For example, if the template list includes radio templates that require the radio network to be disabled prior to applying the radio parameters, the template to disable the radio network must be added to the template first".
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/wcs/7.0/configuration/guide/7_0mobile.html
I think they meant "....to disable the radio network must be added to the config-group first".
This works. I can choose, which template is added first.
But the problem is, after I save my selection of templates in the config-group the order is sorted and my order is lost.
Does someone have experience with that? What is the best way to deploy a config-group? Is it neccessary to disable all radios and WLANs manually prior to the execution of the config-group?
Kind Regards,
Florian

Hi,
Nice post!!
So as per the documentation..
"The order of the templates is important when dealing with radio templates. For example, if the template list includes radio templates that require the radio network to be disabled prior to applying the radio parameters, the template to disable the radio network must be added to the template first".
This means.. we need to push the template first to disable the Radios and then use the Config-groups.. are we doing the same??
While doing the above are facing any issues with losing the config-group list?? Make sure we are pushing the template first and then the config-groups.
lemme know if this answered your question..
Regards
Surendra
====
Please dont forget to rate the posts which answered your question and mark it as answered or was helpfull

Similar Messages

Config groups for a redundant controller

Hello,
I have a primary controller that I configured without using WCS templates.
I am now adding a secondary controller that I will use only for redundant purposes and I would like to sync up the config from the primary.
I know that I can achieve this by using config groups but the problem is that I don't have any templates applied to the primary.
Is there any way to create/import templates based on the existing config of the primary? Then afterwards take those templates and apply them to the config group. Or do I need to manually configure new templates and then add them to the config group?
Thanks for your input,
Justin

I agree... WCS will not push a full config and it's easier to do what nik mentioned.
Thanks,
Scott Fella
Sent from my iPhone

Different order of subgroups groups per configuration in order by clause

Hello,
I have a question regarding Order by and group by of SQL. I have three tables, Groupconfig and ItemConfig and Items.
Group has a extra field which will specify the sorting order of the items when read out from the database.
I have the choice of Sorting by alpa description of the item or a sorting order defined on the item table.
But when I write some SQL to retrieve all the items in the items table and join to the item config table, to get the description of the item and the sorting number,
then join again to the groupconfig table to get the sorting of each group.
Problem is that when I run the query the data is not quite returned in the correct order in each group as defined in the group config for each group.
I know there are differences with the NLS_SORT variable in Oracle but I have a feeling that this is more to do with my SQL can someone help?
I require the overall groups to be retuned by group ID, and within each group a different ordering.
SELECT * FROM
SELECT
GC.GROUPID GP_GROUPID,
GC.DESCRIP GP_DESCRIP,
GC.SORTING_ORDER GP_SORTINGORDER,
IC.SORTING_ORDER IC_SORDER,
IC.DESCR IC_DESCRIPTION,
IC.ITEMID IC_ITEMID,
RID.UNIT I_UNIT,
IC.SORTING_ORDER
FROM
RF_ITEMDETAILS RID,
RF_ITEMCONFIG IC,
RF_GROUPCONFIG GC
WHERE
IC.ITEMID = RID.ITEMID
AND GC.GROUPID = IC.GROUPID
ORDER BY
CASE WHEN GC.SORTING_TYPE = 'N' THEN IC.SORTING_ORDER END,
CASE WHEN GC.SORTING_TYPE = 'A' THEN IC.DESCR END
) GP
ORDER BY GP.GP_SORTINGORDER
But when I run this second group is correct and ordered by Numeric sorting but the first group by the sorting number field is never correct.
Doe this SQL look correct or does anyone know if a good performat way to do this?

maaher cant beleive I actually asked that question. thanks for your reply.
I have changed my SQL to build up the Orber by clause using the case statements like so....( and added Product Group table in also!)
SELECT
PC.PRODUCTID PC_ID,
PC.DESCR PC_DESC,
PC.SORTING_ORDER PC_SORT,
GC.GROUPID GC_GROUPID,
GC.DESCRIP GC_DESCRIP,
GC.SORTING_ORDER GC_SORTINGORDER,
IC.ITEMID IC_ITEMID,
IC.DESCR IC_DESCRIPTION,
IC.SORTING_ORDER IC_SORDER,
RID.UNIT ID_UNIT
FROM
RF_ITEMDETAILS RID,
RF_ITEMCONFIG IC,
RF_GROUPCONFIG GC,
RF_PRODUCTCONFIG PC
WHERE
-- Item Configuration
IC.ITEMID = RID.ITEMID
AND IC.VISIBLE = 'Y'
-- Group Configuration
AND GC.GROUPID = IC.GROUPID
AND GC.VISIBLE = 'Y'
-- Product Configuration
AND PC.PRODUCTID = GC.PRODUCTID
AND PC.VISIBLE = 'Y'
-- Order by
ORDER BY
PC.SORTING_ORDER,
CASE WHEN PC.SORTING_TYPE = 'N' THEN GC.SORTING_ORDER END,
CASE WHEN PC.SORTING_TYPE = 'A' THEN GC.DESCRIP END,
CASE WHEN GC.SORTING_TYPE = 'N' THEN IC.SORTING_ORDER END,
CASE WHEN GC.SORTING_TYPE = 'A' THEN IC.DESCR END

How to use order by within Group by clause

Hi All,
I need a help as to how should i use the Order by clause so that the data should be in order with respect to one column, and at the same time whole data is grouped by some other column...like
Select RaceNo,Venue,FP,BP from Race group by RaceNo
Here I want to order by FP in ascending order for each group. When i am using it , whole order is changing.
Can anybody suggest me how to use order by clause that would apply to each group of data.
Thanks .

order by clause should be used at the last in any query.......but in group by clause u can't use use that becoz u group according to column then no ordering is needed there......if u want to filter something then u can use having clause and later if u need to arrange then u can use order by clause.........
i hope this eg.l gives u some clarification....
e.g
select deptno,count(empno)
from dept
group by deptno
having count(empno) > 10
order by deptno

Custom list column not showing up in View Order by or Group by dropdown list

Hi All,
I have created a custom list with a custom column called "Description". Some items in the list do not have a description. What I wanted to do is create a view where the items with a description show first, and the items with no description are
at the bottom of the list. I thought I could make a simple view that uses the Order by or Group by on the description column.
The problem I am having is the description column doesn't show up in the dropdown list for either Order by or Group by within the custom view. Can someone please tell me why this happens and if there is anything I can do to rectify this problem.
I hope you can help
Colin

Hi,
I believe the "Description" field type is Multiple Lines of Text. Sorting doesn't allow in this field type. In order to do the sorting, you would require to create additional column like single line of text column (note that it supports only 255
chars and require to truncate the data if more than 255) and update the data using event receiver or workflow. and do the sorting with that column.
kmhsad

Error while converting planned order to production order for config materia

Hi experts,
While converting a planned order to production order for a configurable material.I am getting the following error meassage. Message No.CO684,
"You cannot make an assignment to make-to-order stock"
( DiagnosisThe component cannot be allocated to an individual stock because make-to-order production and engineer-to-order production cannot be executed with this order.
A possible cause is that you are trying to create an order with reference to a sales-order/project, where an account assignment to a sales order/project is not allowed in the settlement profile that is assigned to the chosen order type. This is inconsistant.
System ResponseThe following responses are possible:
Order processing is cancelled.
The system resets the special stock indicator back to the original value.
Procedure
Choose another order type).
I have checked some of the threads related to this error. But no where there is any solution.Please tell me if there is any settings to make so as to work on this scenario.
Thanks,
Sham

Hi,
This will be a MTO scenario. Please check your requirement type,Requirement class and strategy type config along with your Item category and schedule line category from SD.
Also check your Production order type config and settlement profiles.
I mean to say that you need new production order type to be configured for specific above mentioned combination.
Are you working on a production system..?? is it the first time you are creating the order for this config material..??
Regards,

OBIEE: Incorrect SQL - with count function uses ORDER BY instead GROUP BY

I made a basic report that is a client count; I want to know how many clients the company have.
But, when I run this report, OBIEE generates a ORDER BY sentence, instead a GROUP BY. Remember that I'm using count function, that is a agregation.
The SQL generated was:
select 'N0' as c1,
count(*) as c2
from
(select distinct T1416.CLIENT_INTER_KEY as c1
from
(select *
from prd.D_SERVICE where SOURCE_SYS in ('ARBOR','PPB') and DW_SERV_ST_ID in (100000003,100000009)) T1836,
(select *
from prd.D_CLIENT) T1416,
(select *
from prd.D_CUSTOMER_ACCOUNT where SOURCE_SYS In ('ARBOR','PPB')) T1515
where ( T1416.DW_CLIENT_ID = T1515.DW_CLIENT_ID and T1515.DW_CUST_ACCT_ID = T1836.DW_CUST_ACCT_ID and T1836.MSISDN = '917330340' )
) D1
order by c1
The error that I receive is:
"Query Status: Query Failed: [nQSError: 16001] ODBC error state: S1000 code: -1005018 message: [Sybase][ODBC Driver][Adaptive Server Anywhere]Illegal ORDER BY item Order Item: 'N0',
-- (opt_OrderBy.cxx 429) .
[nQSError: 16011] ODBC error occurred while executing SQLExtendedFetch to retrieve the results of a SQL statement."
If I substitute ORDER BY with GROUP BY and test it in Sybase, Ithe query runs without any problem.
select 'N0' as c1,
count(*) as c2
from
(select distinct T1416.CLIENT_INTER_KEY as c1
from
(select *
from prd.D_SERVICE where SOURCE_SYS in ('ARBOR','PPB') and DW_SERV_ST_ID in (100000003,100000009)) T1836,
(select *
from prd.D_CLIENT) T1416,
(select *
from prd.D_CUSTOMER_ACCOUNT where SOURCE_SYS In ('ARBOR','PPB')) T1515
where ( T1416.DW_CLIENT_ID = T1515.DW_CLIENT_ID and T1515.DW_CUST_ACCT_ID = T1836.DW_CUST_ACCT_ID and T1836.MSISDN = '917330340' )
) D1
group by c1
Do you know why OBIEE generates this SQL??? Why uses, with a aggregation function, a ORDER BY and not a GROUP BY? How can I resolve this problem???
Regards,
Susana Figueiredo

Verify your repository design and make sure that you have defined count aggregate on fact column. You would also need to define the content level of each dimension in fact table.

Is this Oracle Reports bug – "break order property" in "group above" report

Is this Oracle Reports bug – “break order property” in "group above" report
Could anybody confirm that in "group above" report, we could only order the brake column's values with ""none" or "ascending" or "descending" provided by "break order property"?
In the following example, “Dept” is brake column. Oracle Reports allows us to order values in “Dept” with “descending” provided by “break order property”:
Dept 30
job ename salary
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx
Dept 20
job ename salary
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx
Dept 10
job ename salary
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx
or “ascending” provided by “break order property”:
Dept 10
job ename salary
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx
Dept 20
job ename salary
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx
Dept 30
job ename salary
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx
I need to do:
Dept 20
job ename salary
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx
Dept 10
job ename salary
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx
Dept 30
job ename salary
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx
Could I do this? Could anybody confirm that we could never ever do this, or If yes, how?
Millions of thanks for advice.
M.Z.
Edited by: jielan on Sep 18, 2010 8:23 AM

Why should that be a bug? You have a custom requirement and have to find a way to fulfill it. But, what is your actual sorting order? Do you have only this three departments? If so, you could add an addtional column in your query like
DECODE(DEPT, 20, 1, 10, 2, 30, 3, 4) SORTINGput that column in the same group as dept and sort after that new column.

WCS and WLC WLAN Config not fully in sync

Hi,
We're facing the issue WCS and WLC WLAN Config is not fully in sync. WLC showing server 1 is IP:10.160.22.151, Port:1812 but WCS server showing none even after click on “Audit” button. Any idea how to resolve this issue? Is this causing any wireless problem? Attached is screen captured. Thanks for your help.

You mentioned "audit". Have you done a WCS audit so the WLC and WCS are in SYNC?
If you make a change on the WLC you will not see it in WCS UNLESS they are SYNC. You will see the term "mismatch".
"Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin
‎"I'm in a serious relationship with my Wi-Fi. You could say we have a connection."

Default Page Template for Portal Page Group

Release 2 of Portal (9.0.2.2.22)
Created a page group and several templates.
Edit Page Group Properties, Configure, locate the Default Page Template drop list.
The drop list has only the templates from the shared object page group.
The online help states
=======
Choose the page template to apply to new pages in this page group if the page designer does not explicitly choose one.
Note: This list includes all the page templates in this page group and the shared objects page group.
========
I have several templates in this page group. Why don't they show in this drop list?

You have to make the templates public. Edit the template properties - on the Main tab click "Make Public".

Delivery & Billing block at item level when I create order with config mat

HI All,
I am getting delivery & Billing block at item level when I create an order with config material.
And I am unable to remove the blocks manually since they appear in display mode even in change mode of sales order.
but I could see a biiling document for this order in document flow with 0 value.
Note:
1. The item does not have any reason for rejection
2. Ther is no block set at schedule line category too.
Please give me your valid suggestion as soon as possible since it is production issue.
Thanks & Regards

Dear chandrashekar,
Goto VOV8 , select your order type - Billing - Billing block - keep this field as blank .
Second one , take the default billing type in order type (VOV8) , and Goto OVV4 and click on selection criteria and select billing type , enter your billing type and choose , you will now get the listing of that biling type and check your settings are correct.
saravanan

Using WCS templates

Hi, would like to create a WCS template to disable/enable APs. Does anyone know what existing template to modify or how to create new template? Appreciated.

It doesnt seem possible from a wcs template.
I searched and could not find it.

Authorization role - Purchase Order by Material Groups

Hello experts,
I would like to create an authorization role where he could limit the creation of purchase orders by material groups. However, I checked all the authorization and noticed that at the level of purchases there is no authorization that allows me to such behavior. Is there any way to limit the creation of purchase orders for material group, that is, I have two material groups, and intend to have a function that only allows me to create purchase orders with materials of material group X and another function that only allow me to create purchase orders with materials of material group Y.
To limit the creation of material master by material group I used authorization:
Materials Management: Master Data MM_G
Material Master: Material Groups M_MATE_WGR
There exist any authorization to use for Materials Management: Purchasing - MM_E that allows me to limit the purchase orders by materials group?
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,
José Pereira

Hi,
There is not such Authorisation Object in Standard SAP which will control the PO creation/change/display based on Material Groups.
You need to create a Z-Authorisation object in T-code SU21 under Object Class MM_E and then same to be added for T-Codes ME21N/ME22N/ME23N.
And then you need to call user exit or BAdi (ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST) and call this object with help of ABAPer.

RTF Template: sums with nested groups

Hi all,
i've got quite a pickle of a problem it seems ...
my data structure looks something like this:
<COMPANY>
--<STORE>
----<DEPARTMENT>
------<ITEM></ITEM>
----</DEPARTMENT>
--</STORE>
</COMPANY>
multiple companies can have multiple stores, which in turn have multiple departments, which also in turn can have multiple items.
my select statement looks something like this:
select company_id,
store,
department,
item,
sum(qty) as my_sum
from
table_1, table_2, table_n
where ...
group by ...
order by company_id;
my xml data template grouping looks something like this:
<group name="G_company" ...
--<element name="E_company" ...
--<group name="G_store" ...
----<element name="E_store" ...
----<group name="G_department" ...
------<element name="E_department" ...
------<group name="G_item" ...
--------<element name="E_item" ...
--------<element name="E_item_total" value="my_sum" ...
------</group>
------<element name="E_department_total" value="G_item.E_item_total" function="SUM()" />
----</group>
----<element name="E_store_total" value="G_department.E_department_total" function="SUM()" />
--</group>
</group>
my report currently looks something like:
------------------Store--------Dept---------Dept---------Item-----------Item---------------Store-----------Dept----------Item-----------Item
Company---Townsville---TDept_1------TDept_2-----TDItm1----------TDItm2-------------Newcastle------NDept1----------NDItm1--------------NDItm2
---CompanyA------2----------------4------------3---------------2---------------1------------------1-------------------3----------------2-------------------4
---CompanyB------1----------------2------------4---------------5---------------2------------------1-------------------6----------------3-------------------1
if i just focus on the Store --> Department --> Item, i achieved this in my RTF template by doing something like the following:
<table>
--<tr>
----<td><?for-each-group@column:G_store;E_store?>Store</td><td><?for-each-group@column:G_department;E_department?>Department</td><td><?for-each-group@column:G_item;E_item?>Item<?end for-each-group?> <?end for-each-group?> <?end for-each-group?> </td>
--</tr>
--<tr>
----<td><?for-each-group@column:G_store;E_store?><?E_store_total?></td><td><?for-each-group@column:G_department;E_department?><?E_department_total?></td><td><?for-each-group@column:G_item;E_item?><?E_item_total?><?end for-each-group?> <?end for-each-group?> <?end for-each-group?> </td>
--</tr>
</table>
as you can see, the store --> department --> item go across the report horizontally.
my problem is i want to have grand totals for each column, like:
------------------Store--------Dept---------Dept---------Item-----------Item---------------Store-----------Dept----------Item-----------Item
Company---Townsville---TDept_1------TDept_2-----TDItm1----------TDItm2-------------Newcastle------NDept1----------NDItm1--------------NDItm2
---CompanyA------2----------------4------------3---------------2---------------1------------------1-------------------3----------------2-------------------4
---CompanyB------1----------------2------------4---------------5---------------2------------------1-------------------6----------------3-------------------1
---Total------------3----------------6------------6---------------7---------------3------------------2-------------------9----------------5-------------------5
so i did a SUM on each of the E_store/department/item_totals like:
<?sum(current-group()/E_store_total)?>
now that works for E_store_total ... but not for E_department_total and E_item_total!
it seems BI Publisher doesn't like sums used with inner loops.
because if i extract just the column for E_department, the grand total value at the bottom is correct!
but once i put back the outer store loop, it breaks.
what i am currently getting with this is:
------------------Store--------Dept---------Dept---------Item-----------Item---------------Store-----------Dept----------Item-----------Item
Company---Townsville---TDept_1------TDept_2-----TDItm1----------TDItm2-------------Newcastle------NDept1----------NDItm1--------------NDItm2
---CompanyA------2----------------4------------3---------------2---------------1------------------1-------------------3----------------2-------------------4
---CompanyB------1----------------2------------4---------------5---------------2------------------1-------------------6----------------3-------------------1
---Total------------3----------------4------------3---------------2---------------1------------------1-------------------3----------------2-------------------4
it is doing the grand total for Store correctly, but it just gives me the first row for the other grand totals.
i have tried:
1. using the CUBE function in my SQL query, which gives me the results i want with all the totals i want, except i cannot seem to translate it into XML.
2. trying to use the pivot table option but i can't seem to ever get it to work the way i want.
3. using a separate sql query to retrieve the grandtotals but that doesn't work either because of the multiple looping required.
i'm at a complete dead end, any help would be really appreciated!
ps. i'm a very fresh newbie

Hi Vetsrini,
thank you very much!
when you said to use current-group i was confused because i thought i was using it, but when i opened up the RTF template i realized you meant the actual looping.
so instead of doing:
<?for-each-group@column:G_DEPARTMENT;E_DEPARTMENT?>
<?sum(current-group()/E_STORE_TOTAL)?>
i should have been doing:
<?for-each-group@column:current-group()//G_DEPARTMENT;E_DEPARTMENT?>
<?sum(current-group()/E_ITEM_TOTAL)?>
thanku!
S.

Win7 Computer Config group policy not applying

Hi all: I am having a bit of trouble getting a Computer Configuration group policy to apply in Windows 7 using ZCM 11.2.3. I have two group policies, one for User Configuration settings and the other for Computer Configuration settings. User Config GP is associated with users and Computer Config GP is associated with Workstations. ZCM shows both policies as being successfully applied. Yet, if I run rsop.msc to generate a resultant GP set, all Computer Config settings show up as undefined.
I have used this same technique in XP for many years without issue. I suspect the User Config GP is overwriting all GP settings as it is the last to be applied, but since that policy is ONLY for User Config settings I do not see how. Can someone show me the "errors of my ways"?
Thanks a bunch, Chris.

I have an identical policy setup - a policy wherein "Computer configuration" is checked and configured (I don't even touch the User related settings) and is applied to workstations as well as a second policy with "User configuration" checked and configured (as with the computer policy, I don't touch the Computer related policy in this User policy) and applied to users. I set it up that way because I want general settings specific to our environment to exist and be effective for all users including IT staff in the Computer policy. I then want to restrict users within the User Policy. I have no Active Directory.
The computer settings apply intermittently with no rhyme or reason, which makes it difficult to troubleshoot. I have Internet Zone Assignments configured in the Computer policy, so specific users have problems when this policy is not effective which is how I became aware of the problem. I found that I can run "gpudate /force" as the user and the computer policy becomes effective, which is what I do most of the time since it's a quick fix and I can move on to other things. I've tried changing the order the policies are applied. I am considering creating a single policy with both computer and user settings and associating it with users in hopes that it will always apply, but thought I'd check out the forum before doing so. ZCM 11.2.3 and Windows 7.

WCS: Template Order in Config Group

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for