Websheet objects never valid

Trying to install websheet objects.
objects install no errors
run Validate websheet objects
get the following:
APEX$_ACL     Yes     Invalid     Valid     Valid     Valid
APEX$_WS_FILES     Yes     Invalid     Valid     Valid     Valid
APEX$_WS_HISTORY     Yes     Invalid     Valid     -     -
APEX$_WS_LINKS     Yes     Invalid     Valid     Valid     Valid
APEX$_WS_NOTES     Yes     Invalid     Valid     Valid     Valid
APEX$_WS_ROWS     Yes     Invalid     Valid     Valid     Valid
APEX$_WS_TAGS     Yes     Invalid     Valid     Valid     Valid
APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS     Yes     Invalid     Valid     Valid     Valid
APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTION_HISTORY     Yes     Invalid     Valid     -     -
run correct invalid objects and get
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTION_HISTORY drop column application_user_id;
alter table APEX$_ACL drop column username;
alter table APEX$_ACL drop column priv;
alter table APEX$_ACL drop column created_by;
alter table APEX$_ACL drop column updated_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column section_type;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column nav_include_link;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column chart_type;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column chart_3d;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column chart_label;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column label_axis_title;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column chart_value;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column value_axis_title;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column chart_aggregate;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column chart_sorting;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column created_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_WEBPG_SECTIONS drop column updated_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_ROWS drop column unique_value;
alter table APEX$_WS_ROWS drop column owner;
alter table APEX$_WS_ROWS drop column geocode;
alter table APEX$_WS_ROWS drop column created_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_ROWS drop column updated_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_HISTORY drop column column_name;
alter table APEX$_WS_HISTORY drop column application_user_id;
alter table APEX$_WS_NOTES drop column component_level;
alter table APEX$_WS_NOTES drop column created_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_NOTES drop column updated_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_LINKS drop column component_level;
alter table APEX$_WS_LINKS drop column show_on_homepage;
alter table APEX$_WS_LINKS drop column link_name;
alter table APEX$_WS_LINKS drop column created_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_LINKS drop column updated_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_TAGS drop column component_level;
alter table APEX$_WS_TAGS drop column created_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_TAGS drop column updated_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_FILES drop column component_level;
alter table APEX$_WS_FILES drop column name;
alter table APEX$_WS_FILES drop column mime_type;
alter table APEX$_WS_FILES drop column content_charset;
alter table APEX$_WS_FILES drop column content_filename;
alter table APEX$_WS_FILES drop column created_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_FILES drop column updated_by;
alter table APEX$_WS_FILES drop column image_alias;
alter table APEX$_WS_FILES drop column image_attributes;
click on correct
objects are still invalid
any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Wayne
Edited by: wcoleku on Jun 30, 2010 2:44 PM
Additional info
It appears that we have 2 tables with the same name for the websheet objects example below
APEX_APPS is the schema owner. Could this be causing my problem?
OWNER OBJECT_TYPE OBJECT_NAME
APEX_APPS TABLE APEX$_ACL
APEX_040000 TABLE APEX$_ACL
APEX_APPS TABLE APEX$_WS_FILES
APEX_040000 TABLE APEX$_WS_FILES

Hi Wayne!
How i understand websheet objects validating procedure compare structure tables in original scheme apex_040000 and scheme owner.
So what we can see:
desc apex_040000.apex$_acl;
Имя Пусто? Тип
ID NOT NULL NUMBER
WS_APP_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
USERNAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(255)
PRIV NOT NULL VARCHAR2(1)
CREATED_ON NOT NULL DATE
CREATED_BY NOT NULL VARCHAR2(255)
UPDATED_ON DATE
UPDATED_BY VARCHAR2(255)
desc apex_apps.apex$_acl;
Имя Пусто? Тип
ID NOT NULL NUMBER
WS_APP_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
USERNAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(255 CHAR)
PRIV NOT NULL VARCHAR2(1 CHAR)
CREATED_ON NOT NULL DATE
CREATED_BY NOT NULL VARCHAR2(255 CHAR)
UPDATED_ON DATE
UPDATED_BY VARCHAR2(255 CHAR)
Username in original apex scheme VARCHAR2(255) and in the owner scheme VARCHAR2(255 CHAR).
Next,
show parameter NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS
NAME TYPE
VALUE
nls_length_semantics string
CHAR
How i understand problem with nls_lenght_semantics parameter....
Some workaround solutions:
1) Manual modify table columns such as:
alter apex_apps.apex$_acl modify username varchar2(255 byte);
alter apex_apps.apex$_acl modify PRIV VARCHAR2(1 byte);
After that run validate websheet again and you will see that the columns of the table were correct and you can create websheet applications.
2) ALTER SYSTEM set NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS = BYTE scope spfile; (I'm not sure that this is a good solution)
Restart Database, Remove Websheet database objects and create again.
Best regards, Igor.

Similar Messages

  • Error : Catalog object schema validation failed in OBIEE 11.1.1.5

    Hi all ,
    Facing the below error while accessing few reports present in a folder (Voice Tab) . But , able to access other reports present in the same folder .
    Catalog object schema validation failed: /users/weblogic/sayak/TPLAN reports/Voice Tab/Net revenue per minute (ILD\/NLD)
    Error Details
    Error Codes: AGFIXBO2:EIRWWH9E
    Location: saw.httpserver.processrequest, saw.rpc.server.responder, saw.rpc.server, saw.rpc.server.handleConnection, saw.rpc.server.dispatch, saw.threadpool, saw.threadpool, saw.threads
    Also while try to edit the analysis (Net revenue per minute (ILD\/NLD) from catalog , i am getting the above error .The Reports were fine till yesterday , What could be the issue ?
    Thanks

    Hi Devarasu ,
    Yeah .. I'm aware of this bug of 11.1.1.5 , but I'm puzzeled by the sudden impact of it . i.e , It didn't gave me the error while creating/editing the file yesterday and looked fine on dashboard as well .
    However , If there's no alternative other than applying patch , then please let me know the patch ID .
    And applying this patch means , just overwriting some configure files in the OBIEE home folder sructure ? or somthing else ?
    Thanks

  • AP_INVOICE_DISTRBUTIONS_ALL table has no data for "Never Validated" Invoice

    Hi,
    Our client requires to display the GL Account as it shows on the payables distributions screen.
    Till 11i, we never have this issue.
    But in R12, it looks weird that the AP_INVOICE_DISTRBUTIONS_ALL table, doesn't even have any data if the Invoice is in "Never Validated" status.
    But the frontend screen shows the distribution level details.
    This looks totally wierd.
    Can you please throw any light on this and provide me an information on where to pick up the information.
    Thanks,
    Kesava

    Hi,
    Thanks a lot for your response.
    It actually uses AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_V, but it doesn't show the record history in the front-end. It says Record History not available.
    I actually investigated more on this and got the issue. We actually have TAX Setup issues and the distributions are actually not saved to the database due to errors.
    But somehow they are shown once we return back to the same invoice distributions screen, but it has Distribution Class as "Preview" instead of "Saved" or some other status.
    Its a straight forward thing that the records are not available in the tables, if the Distribution Class is "Preview". This is a new functionality in R12.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Kesava

  • Check if element/object is valid

    Hi folks,
    Can I programatically say if an object is valid or not?
    Today, i'm returning true(1) or false(0) in the Validate event of the object but I want to do it using API/Programatically, for example, I have a TableRow1 and I want to do something like that:
    TableRow1.IsValid = true;
    Possible?
    Thanks,
    Yair

    If TableRow1 does not exist then an error will be generated indicating that there is no such object. I do not think you can do what you are thinking. Maybe if you describe your problem we can suggest a different approach.
    paul

  • Please put a cost object with valid JV data for GL accoutnt (line 001)

    Dear All,
    When the user is trying to post ASKBN, They are getting an error saying "Please put a cost object with valid JV data for GL accoutnt (line 001)"
    So we tried to look up the error, and the WBS, Cost center, profit center and JVA details are all available in place. Still cant understand why this error comes. And why the system is asking to put JV details when they are available.
    On checking, WBS has an AUC and AUC has the cost center which has the JV details and PC details. So I think everything is in place.
    Can someone help please and let us know if we are missing anything else that needs to be checked ?
    Thanks,
    Hari Dharen

    Dear Hari Dharen,
    if something else in missung you'll get a error message if you run ASKBN in testmodus.
    regards Bernhard
    Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Oct 5, 2010 8:55 AM

  • Catalog object schema validation failed(AGFIXBO2:EIRWWH9E)

    Hi,
    After copying my catalog from OBIEE 11.1.1.6.*0* (Build 120104.0800 64-bit) to 11.1.1.6.*7* (Build 121219.1257 64-bit).
    Many of my report (particularly those with graphs) was not valid.
    I have this message :
    Catalog object schema validation failed: /shared/...
    Error Details
    Error Codes: AGFIXBO2:EIRWWH9E
    Location: saw.httpserver.processrequest, saw.rpc.server.responder, saw.rpc.server, saw.rpc.server.handleConnection, saw.rpc.server.dispatch, saw.threadpool.socketrpcserver, saw.threads
    The current xml is invalid with the following errors: Bad xml instance! <?xml version="1.0"?> <saw:report xmlns:saw="com.siebel.analytics.web/report/v1.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" .... Message:Value 'actual' is not in enumeration .
    Please someone has any ideas to solve this issues.

    Hello,
    Check is post : Catalog object schema validation failed:  11.1.1.6.7 Patchset
    Also check this note : OBIEE 11g: Error: "Catalog object schema validation failed...Error Codes: AGFIXBO2:EIRWWH9E" After Upgrade [ID 1247125.1]
    Hope this helps. Pls mark if it does.
    Thanks,
    SVS

  • Catalog object privilege validation failed for user.

    Hi,
    I'm getting following error after adding the HTML tags in dashboard 11g.
    How to set the privileges?..Kindly let me know.Thank you.
    Error Massage:
    Catalog object privilege validation failed for user to path /users/User1/_portal/page 1.
    You do not currently have sufficient privileges to save a report or dashboard page that contains HTML markup. Dashboard contains custom HTML tags as part of static text.

    Hi User,
    Go to Settings -> Administrators -> Manage Privileges -> 'Answers'
    Here you can view - "Save Content with HTML Markup" next to it you will see 'Presentation Server Administrators'
    Click it and Change for 'Everyone'
    And, Save changes. Restart BI Services now you can add the contents and it will not popup any error messages.
    Thank you.
    Award Points and Close the Post as Answered to help others with same issue :)

  • AP: daily concurrent request runs but some invoices are never validated

    We have a process running every night (APPRVL module: Invoice Validation) to pick up invoice batches and this process should try to validate the invoices within each batch (we do not use approvals or workflow within AP). The APPRVL process always completes without error. Therefore every invoice within each batch should either have a status of 'validated' or 'requires re-validation'. I keep finding invoices within the batch with a status of 'never validated'. These invoices tend to have 'value' mismatch between the distribution total and the invoice total. I would therefore assume the APPRVL process to place a distribution variance hold on the invoice, but as i say the invoice remains at the status 'never validated' I have checked the log files for the APPRVL process : the logs contain details relating to each invoice picked up within the batch and whether APPRVL has validated successfully or not.
    I have searched through metalink and cannot find any reason why the invoices may be missed. These invoices can be manually validated, although they will require re-validation because of the distribution variance hold placed on it. however it proves that there is no data missing from the invoice
    Does anyone have any ideas as to why the invoices may be missed.
    many thanks for any help you can offer

    Hi,
    this is not normal ..however it is possible ... Can you check the configuration for the profile option "Allow Adjustments to Paid Invoice" set for your payables responsibility .. if this is set to YES, then your system allows modifications to the Invoices even after they are accounted and paid ...
    I guess that should be causing the issue ...
    For performing a test case in your Test/Supt environment, make sure the above profile option is enabled and create an Invoice, validate it and make payment to it ... now again query back the invoice and insert a new line and distribution ... this would make the invoice change to NEEDS REVALIDATION status i.e. match_status_flag = T .. and also placing LINE variance / DIST variance hold ...
    Regards,
    Ivruksha

  • Oracle AP match_status_flag goes to T (tested but never validated)

    Hello,
    We have custom triggers that are auditing ap_invoices_all and ap_invoice_distributions_all to capture who validated the invoices, who re-validated and who paid them.
    Based on the documentation from mos they document the following. Since I want to capture when the invoice is validated I put a condition that if the flag is changed to A we capture that as a validated invoice. Some cases it never progresses to A but instead to T. I am not sure how to re-produce this case of T (tested but never validated) as I have created many invoices in our test system with the same holds, for the same vendor, same invoice type etc and validate them but the match status flag goes to A never T.
    I know I could re-build the auditing and rely on some other flag or maybe on ap_invoices_v to determine validation but what we have in place is working great with this one exception so I would rather not start from scratch.
    Can somebody just let me know what scenarios can cause this flag to go to T? That would help me a great deal.
    Here are the My oracle support details on this flag
    *+<Moderator Edit - deleted MOS Doc 301806.1 content - pl do not post such content - it is a violation of your Support agreement>+*                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

    Hi,
    this is not normal ..however it is possible ... Can you check the configuration for the profile option "Allow Adjustments to Paid Invoice" set for your payables responsibility .. if this is set to YES, then your system allows modifications to the Invoices even after they are accounted and paid ...
    I guess that should be causing the issue ...
    For performing a test case in your Test/Supt environment, make sure the above profile option is enabled and create an Invoice, validate it and make payment to it ... now again query back the invoice and insert a new line and distribution ... this would make the invoice change to NEEDS REVALIDATION status i.e. match_status_flag = T .. and also placing LINE variance / DIST variance hold ...
    Regards,
    Ivruksha

  • Help with instantiating objects and validating them please

    Hello,
    im working on an assigment where i have to make a milk tank object that simulates a Milk tanker (one of those things that carrys milk :P)
    It has a specific constructor that you can pass the volume and capacity to it. I was wondering how i could validate this and make it so the object doesnt instantiate and maybe return an error message if the volume of milk exceeds the capacity of the milk tanker?
    basically i just want to make sure an object is valid while it instantiates, otherwise bomb out and return an error..
    Thank you,
    Phill
    PS: im still learning java so some stuff might be over my head, but ive got a book next to me to help me understand :) (yes, ive checked and i cant find anything on this subject)

    public MilkTanker(int volume, int capacity) throws
    InvalidArgumentException
    if (volume > capacity)
    throw new InvalidArgumentException("Volume can't be greater than >capacity");
    this.volume = volume;
    this.capacity = capacity
    }This means that while trying to create a new object of this class you need to handle a possible exception:
    public static void main (String [] args){
       try {
          MilkTanker tank = new MilkTanker(100, 1000);
       catch (InvalidArgumentException _){
          System.err.println(_.getMessage());
    }In the case that an exception is thrown the object of this class will not be created and every line of code you might have after the constructor call (inside the try clause) will not be executed.
    Hope that helped
    afotoglidis

  • Websheet objects non-existent or invalid -- how to correct?

    OS: RHEL 5.4
    DB: 11gR2
    APEX: 4.1
    After upgrade of APEX to 4.1, websheet objects non-existent or invalid -- hence, can not create Websheet app. Any clues on how to correct and/or what may be wrong? Sample database applications imported and working fine.
    Cheers!

    Got this figured out...
    Just had to install the sample Websheets from the Application.
    Cheers!

  • Problem in using View Object for validation

    Hi,
    I have defined a simple swing form to practice. It has one Entity Object and two View objects. One of these view objects is an updatable VO based on the EO and the other one has a simple "select count(*)" from a table. I defined a method validation on one of the EO attributes to see how can i use the VO for validation. On the other hand i defined the Application Module to use both of my views. As far as i undrestood, when i define a VO for AM, the AM will instantiate it the first time it starts running. Here is the code inside the method validation for FirstName attribute:
    /**Validation method for FirstName
    public boolean validateFirstName(String data) {
    ViewObject vo = getDBTransaction().getRootApplicationModule().findViewObject("CountEmployeeInstance");
    if (vo == null) {
    System.out.println("vo is null");
    else {
    vo.executeQuery();
    if (vo.hasNext()){
    System.out.println("count = " + ((CountEmployeeRowImpl) vo.next()).getCount());
    else {
    System.out.println("vo has no next");
    return true;
    The problem is that vo.executeQuery() does not return any record. In fact the vo.hasNext() returns false and i get the message "vo has no next" on the console. Please pay attention that the VO's sql statement is SELECT COUNT(*) and it always returns a record. I found that if i use vo.closeRowSet() before vo.executeQuery() everything works fine.
    Please tell me that what is my problem and why is it working like this?
    Best Regards,
    Alireza Vali

    Chris,
    1- Every thing is fine with the ADF model layer in this practice. I have tested it by using Test option on AM and it works. It works exactly the same as how it works throug swing UI that i use for it.
    2- The VO is beeing found and as you see in the code, i have tested it by "if (vo == null)" just after the statement which finds it and vo is not null which means it has been instantiated by AM as it was supposed to.
    3- The VO's SQL statement is "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM EMPLOYEE" with no where clause. I have 14 records in this table.
    Every thing is OK with swing form. It runs and shows the records and all the binded operations like "next record", "previous record" and so on work perfectly on the records.
    4- The code i used is a combination of two examples. Example 9-7 and 9-8 in pages 9-12 and 9-13 of mentioned document.
    Now my findings:
    I changed the code to the following:
        /**Validation method for FirstName
        public boolean validateFirstName(String  data) {
            ViewObject vo = getDBTransaction().getRootApplicationModule().findViewObject("MaxEmployeeIdInstance");
            if (vo == null) {
                System.out.println("vo is null");
            else {
                //vo.closeRowSet();
                vo.executeQuery();
                System.out.println("Row Count = " + vo.getRowCount());
                System.out.println("Default Slot = " + vo.getCurrentRowSlot());
                vo.next();
                System.out.println("Slot after next() = " + vo.getCurrentRowSlot());
                vo.reset();
                System.out.println("Slot after reset() = " + vo.getCurrentRowSlot());
                vo.first();
                System.out.println("Slot after first() = " + vo.getCurrentRowSlot());
                vo.last();
                System.out.println("Slot after last() = " + vo.getCurrentRowSlot());
                System.out.println("----------------------");
                vo.executeQuery();
                System.out.println("Deafault index = " + vo.getCurrentRowIndex());
                vo.next();
                System.out.println("Index after next() = " + vo.getCurrentRowIndex());
                vo.reset();
                System.out.println("Index after reset() = " + vo.getCurrentRowIndex());
                vo.first();
                System.out.println("Index after first() = " + vo.getCurrentRowIndex());
                vo.last();
                System.out.println("Index after last() = " + vo.getCurrentRowIndex());
                System.out.println("Slot Before First = " + vo.SLOT_BEFORE_FIRST);
                System.out.println("Slot Beyound Last = " + vo.SLOT_BEYOND_LAST);
            return true;
        }Here are the results :
    Row Count = 1
    Default Slot = 0
    Slot after next() = 3
    Slot after reset() = 0
    Slot after first() = 0
    Slot after last() = 0
    Deafault index = 0
    Index after next() = -1
    Index after reset() = 0
    Index after first() = 0
    Index after last() = 0
    Slot Before First = 2
    Slot Beyound Last = 3
    As you see, after the execution of the statement "vo.executeQuery()" the The RowIterrator pointer is not pointing to the slot before the first record but it is pointing to the first record itself. And that is why the statement "if (vo.hasNext()" returns false because we just have one record and RowIterrator Index is standing on that record and there is no next record present. The very important thing is that even reset() method does not set the index to the slot before the first record and it sends it to the first record.
    After that, i took the statemet "vo.closeRowSet()" out of the comment and here are the results:
    Row Count = 1
    Default Slot = 2
    Slot after next() = 0
    Slot after reset() = 2
    Slot after first() = 0
    Slot after last() = 0
    Deafault index = -1
    Index after next() = 0
    Index after reset() = -1
    Index after first() = 0
    Index after last() = 0
    Slot Before First = 2
    Slot Beyond Last = 3
    These are the exact things that we expected from the first. After query execution, the pointer is set to the slot before first record and the reset() method does its defined job which is sending the pointer to the slot before the the first record.
    My Assumptions:
    The Rowset which is created by AM is somehow different from the RowSet which you create in your program. I am absolutely sure that this functionality is not a bug but a design decission. I look at my simple program and see that when it runs, the data is queried and shown on the screen which is all done by AM by instantiating my VO and executing the query on it. AM reasonably must put the RowSet pointer on the first record and not the slot before first record. And i am sure that if i use reset() method on the shown RowSet, the pointer goes to the first record and the data on the screen does not get cleared. Whe we use vo.closeRowSet() and execute the query again, the AM made RowSet is closed and a new one is created and the new RowSet is your's not AM's so it functions as you expect.
    Best Regards,
    Alireza Vali

  • DIR not visible from attached sap object and validation check problem

    Hi Experts,
    I have created new sap object link for table BUT000 and transaction code is BP.
    Now
    1) when I am creating DIR through CV01N, I am able to view Object link column with one filed called PARTNER.
    If I enter wrong or Invalid partner here, system is not performing any validation, it accepts it and if I save DIR it gets saved with invalid business partner.
    2) secondly lets say i have entered valid business partner and saved the DIR, then in transaction code BP, I am not able to view any DIR for that business partner.
    Need your valuable Input on this.

    Hi Ravindra,
    While adding the screen I had copy pasted logic from screen 1204 as per guidelines to add the screen.
    One more thing added in guide line was, 'Please do not make any changes in it'.
    I think this is the system check which is already there when we copy paste logic from 1204 but due to some reason it has got problem.
    For the 2nd screen also I have given the same logic which is in 1204 screen of CV130.
    But here the problem is when I double click on any Module or any perform it asks me to create.
    That means this module and performs does not exist in function group CV140, they all exist in function group CV130.
    I try creating the same modules in CV140 also but there are many variables, internal tables which does not exist in CV140.
    Any help on this will be appreciated.

  • BPM Objects in valid values

    Hi,
    I want to display a combo box showing some strings to the user, but having something else in the background. Using e.g. an integer in the background is easy. But is there a way to put complex objects (i.e. BPM objects) "behind" the string values?
    Thanks & Regards
    Matthias

    Hi,
    we usually use this way to show objects in combo box: BPM object has an id attribute (Integer). We will associate combobox with this id. Open attribute properties if 'id'. Mark 'dynamic method' on valid values. Mark 'method return descriptions' too. You have to create a method thats returns a String[int]. This will contain text displayed on combo box associated to this id. Users will see the text but you get the id of the selected object.
    Regards,
    Juan Escot

  • EJB P.R.O.narrow method returns a null reference though object is valid

    All,
    I'm trying to deploy a simple stateless session bean to SUN server. The client code keeps failing because PortableRemoteObject.narrow returns null, even though the reference is located in JNDI tree.
    I read somewhere that turning on RMI stub generation might help, but it didn't do it in my case.
    This is a local server (SUN App Server, as downloaded from java.sun site).
    JNDI tree contains the following entries:
    UserTransaction
    test.Dummy
    jdbc
    ejb
    test.Server
    Neither test.Dummy nor test.Server (the beans I deployed) want to load.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks!
    Mark

    Never mind. For some reason changing initial context creation from:
    Properties p=new Properties();
    p.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,"whatever factory");
    p.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL,"whatever url");
    InitialContext context=new InitialContext(p);
    to:
    InitialContext context=new InitialContext();
    fixed the problem. Which is strange, since JNDI tree was listing both objects, and they both could be resolved when using the first code snippet. Only the actual object creation was failing.
    If anyone knows why this is so, please explain.
    Cheers,
    Mark

Maybe you are looking for

  • I just bought an iphone 4s from someone off of Craigslist and I am using my consumer cellular sim but it's saying I need to contact the carrier to unlock the phone?

    I bought an iphone 4s from someone off of craigslist. I went to update to ios7 (it was running ios5 for some reason) and when it finally updated it said the phone needed to be unlocked by the carrier. I don't know who the original carrier of the phon

  • Local Machine not present in local configuration store

    Having trouble getting Lync 2013 installed on a Windows Server 2012R2 OS. Pool consists of Lync Server and SharePoint Server.  Using Enterprise version so Databases are on separate SQL 2012 server. All machines domained. Logged in as myself who has d

  • How to use Transaction RATRACE0N

    Hello All, If i am using transaction RATRACE0N in my system i am getting an following message "It is not possible to display the depreciation calculation Message no. AY818 Diagnosis Information on the calculation of depreciation is not available on t

  • Apple ID not verified

    Im trying to sign into find my iphone app on my iphone and ipad and keep getting the apple id not verified.  I was able to login without any problems for months.  I went to appleid.apple.com and my email address is verified.  I also have no problems

  • (CanoScan 9000F) of SERIAL no. -

    I have canon scanner (CanoScan 9000F) , I want to ask from where we can change the DPI  settings and what is the highest resolution? and what is the DPI of the scanned JPG document when we do auto scanning? <Serial Number removed as per Forum Guideli