When we should use F-54 clear down payment

Hi,
When should I use T-code F-54 clear down payment? Is this necessary to perform this step?
1. F-47 down payment request
2. F-48 post down payment
3. MIGO post good receipt of PO
4. MIRO post vendor invoice
5. F-58 payment by check (for outstanding balance)
Any advice are welcome.
Thanks,
Wendy

Dear Wendy,
usually the steps to perform, when You're using DP,  are the following ones:
1. F-47 Down payment request
2. F110 Down payment
3. FB60 Invoice
4. F-54 Down payment Clearing
By F-54 that is the downpayment clearing, the System will close the
first line item of the downpaymewnt with PK 29A
by the first line item of downpaymewnt clearing with PK 39A;
and it opens a new vendor line item by the posting key 26.
This means that from the financial point of view the system transforms
the original downpaymen into a partial payment.
Therefore the downpayment clearing has an economic value.
It changes the Down payment (that is posted using a special G/L
indicator) into a partial payment (that does not have any special
G/L indicator).
I hope this can help You.
Mauri

Similar Messages

  • [svn] 4934: Fix a bug around when we should use NativeDragManagerImpl.

    Revision: 4934
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2009-02-11 16:21:31 -0800 (Wed, 11 Feb 2009)
    Log Message:
    Fix a bug around when we should use NativeDragManagerImpl. Before we were checking the player capabilities to see if it was "Desktop". However, some players that are actually AIR will return "Library" instead. So rather than keying off of the capabilities of the player, let's just see if NativeDragManagerImpl is there. If it is, use it. Otherwise, use DragManagerImpl.
    QE Notes: None
    Doc Notes: None
    Bugs: SDK-19079
    Reviewer: Jason
    tests: checkintests, mustella DragManager, Joann ran NativeDragManager ones
    Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-19079
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/managers/SystemManager.as

    Hello,
    >>Does Database initializer obsolete in EF 6.0?
    I do not know why you think so, if the team decides to make the database initializer obsolete, I think they would make a markup as Deprecated, however, there is not such a markup on that method on MSDN document. And the Database initializer method is useful
    when we play with automatic migration. In your case, the DropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges database initialization strategy, would delete the original database and create new one according your new model. Of course, data would be missing. If you are under a
    scenario need to make a test to recreate the database frequently, this one should be ok.
    Currently, there are four database initialization strategies could be used:
    CreateDatabaseIfNotExists<TContext> Class
    DropCreateDatabaseAlways<TContext>
    DropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges<TContext>
    MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion<TContext, TMigrationsConfiguration>
    You could use one of them for a proper scenario.
    Regards.
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Payment run error:Only clear down payment requests individually :DEFTAX 012

    Hi ,
    In the payment run, I get the error as "Only clear down payment requests individually"
    The error code is DEFTAX 012 . What is the reason and solution. It seems to be a downpayment.
    Please suggest the needful.
    Regards
    Rudra

    Check any of the following notes whether it helps you.
    1)  Note 1127049 - New deferred tax: DEFTAX025 when posting down payment clr.
    2)  Note 1154793 - Def.Tax: No Amounts in Local Currency; Wrong Amount Diff.
    3)  Note 1160939 - Deferred Tax: Error DEFTAX(023) for Payment of 2 DP Requests
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Clear Down payment against Vendor Invoice through Automatic Payment Program

    Hi
    We have to adjust vendor invoice against down payment (Advance) made through automatic payment program (F110)
    Please guide us is there any configuration require to consider Down payment transactions during F110 to clear against Vendor Invoice
    Ex :1. Advance payment made through special GL indicator 50K.
    2. Invoice document 75K posted in vendor.
    3. Now we have to clear down payment made (50K) against 75K through F110.
    Regards
    Sreenivasulu

    Hi srinivasulu,
    First u create down payment request through F-47 and define the spl gl indicator for down payment and assign the gl account for down payment gl code..
    Regards,
    Nivas

  • When we should use JMS based proxy services and when JMS Adapter in OSB

    Hi,
    Can somebody explain me when we could go for JMS Adapter and when we should go for JMS based service in OSB?
    The one scenerio i can think of is when my provider/consumer is using jms provider other than WLS jms provider we should use jms adapter.
    Edited by: user12883209 on Jan 5, 2012 5:29 AM

    I don't think there are clear guidelines available, however here is my view.
    1) OSB 11gR1 is not certified with Oracle JMS Adapter. It is certified with Oracle FTP, Database, AQ and application adapters.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/doc.1111/e15867/interop.htm#OSBAG1403
    2) In addition of the Weblogic JMS, OSB can also integrate with following provider without using adapter.
    - WebSphere MQ
    - Tibco EMS
    3) if you need to integrate JMS with BPEL Process or Oracle SOA suite composite, it has built in support for generic Oracle JMS adapter. Oracle generic JMS adapter can integrate with AQ JMS (JMS providers OJMS 8.1.7, 9.0.1.4, and 9.2), TIBCO JMS, IBM Websphere MQSeries (IBM MQSeries JMS 6.0), Weblogic JMS, Apache, and Active MQ
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14571_01/integration.1111/e10231/adptr_jms.htm
    4) If you need to integrate OSB with Weblogic JMS, WebSphere MQ, Tbco EMS it does not need JMS adapter.
    Hope this helps !!!
    Jayesh Patel
    http://jayesh-patel.blogspot.com/
    http://www.yagnasys.com/

  • Wrong commitment reduction when clearing down payments

    Hi, we are implementing PSM-FM in ERP version 6.0. We have BCS and
    online payment update activated.
    We are having problems regarding down payment clearings.The commitment
    reduction is not working properly.
    Detailed explanation:
    1. We created a purchase order for a single material. FM Account
    assignments to a single funds center for $500.000.(doc number 11000006).
    FM integration ok!: a record for value type 51 (purchase orders), value
    $500.000 is created.
    2. We then create a down paymen request (trx F-47) for $100.000 with
    reference to the previous purchase order.
    No FM repercussion which is ok!
    3. We then pay (via F110) the down payment request. We got a down
    payment document for $100.000 (doc 90000008).
    FM integration ok!: a record for value type 61 (down payments), value
    $100.000 is created. A reduction (amount type 0200) for $100.000 also
    is recorded in value type 51 (purchase orders).
    4. We then make a partial goods receipt (MIGO) for $ 500.000.
    No FM repercussions / postings which is ok.
    5. Next, we make a partial invoice receipt (MIRO), for $110.000, total
    $134.200, including VAT for $24.200 (doc 300000030).
    FM integration ok!: a record for value type 54 (invoices), value
    $110.000 is created. A reduction (amount type 0200) for $110.000 also
    is recorded in value type 51 (purchase orders).
    6. Next we partially clear the down payment against the invoice. We
    need only to clear $20.000 from the original $100.000. We use trx F-54
    for this. (doc 300000031)
    FM integration ok!: a record for value type 61 (down payment), negative
    value $20.000 is created. A record (amount type 0200) for $20.000 also
    is recorded in value type 51 (purchase orders).
    7. We then pay the invoice (via F110), taking into account the credit
    for the previous $20.000. (doc 900000016)
    FM integration issues:
    7a)  For value type 54 (invoices) a reduction (amount type 0200) for
    value $93.606,56 is recorded.
    7b)  A "paid" (amount type 0250) for $93.606,56 also is recorded in
    value type 57 (payments).
    We do not desire nor understand why the system behaves like this. We
    are
    familiar with previous versions and the desired behavior in a 5.0
    system would have been:
       The total amount of the paid invoice ($ 110.000) be recorded as
       a "paid" (amount type 0250) in value type 57 (payments).
    If not, we would never see the total amount of the invoice as "paid".
    Please, can you help me?
    Regards,

    Hi Diego,
    I suggest you to review note 400924 since all existing critical business cases (already defined for RFFMS200) remain valid also for payment online update. I also suggest you to check the documentation using the F1 help in transaction OF29.
    Make sure notes 1150182, 1166048 and 1224438 are applied in your system.
    You can find information about the down payment functionality in consulting note 1279351 and also in its related notes 1001216, 532725. Also make sure your customizing is in accordance with the payment update online manual.
    I hope the information above helps you.
    Regards, Mateus

  • Lost Page on when you should use MVC vs when you should use web forms

    I read a page last week.  I think it was on MSDN.  It was talking about the relative merits of MVC and web forms.  However, unlike the page http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd381412.aspx,
    which merely states the advantages and disadvantages of each format, this page went on to state something like:
    You should use MVC:
    when building web apps that do this
    when you web app needs that
    when you are doing the other
    You should use web forms:
    when building these other kinds of web app
    when your web app does this other thing
    when your web app does this.
    Does anyone know the page to which I am referring?
    (Oh and since when did it become impossible to paste anything into a question or reply block in MSDN forums.  This makes it very difficult to paste in page links.)
    Also I am not seeing an appropiate forum in my forums dropdown list.  So if a moderator wants to move it to the right forum I would appreciate it.
    Edward R. Joell MCSD MCDBA

    @Darnie Graceline Selvamary Thangalazar
    The first link is not what I was looking for as it tells the difference between MVC and Web Forms but not which is better for what.
    The second link does get more into which is better in certain situations but doesn't really analyze each type of project and specify that this is good for web forms and this is good for MVC.  However, it does provide some ways to analyze if your
    "situation" would be best served by using web forms and which would be best served by using MVC. 
    It specified that if reaction time is an issue then MVC is the answer.  This is good because with our excruciatingly slow network we need apps that take inherantly as little time as possible to load.
    I took another look at the link provided by gaurav.  Turns out that link has a link to an article by Dino Espisito which actually has the statement that I referred to above i.e. if your app has a lot of busines data.  After two years, that
    is as much as I remember of that page.  So in fact indirectly gaurav found the page I was looking for.
    Too bad I did not re-read this link when I started the current project, though.  One thing each of them says is that if your team (in this case me) has not had much experience in handling html elements directly then MVC is not a good fix for them. 
    For the last 6 months theis has been a major learning process in using JQuery, AJAX, and MVC to accomplish tasks which I've could have done using server controls and web forms with my eyes closed.  Too bad they don't make MVC so that you can use server
    controls with it.
    However since this thread is so old and unlike "Whose Line is it Anyway?" the points
    do matter. I am going to award the answer to gaurav.  Thanks everyone for providing some very interesting links on MVC.
    Edward R. Joell MCSD MCDBA

  • F-29 Down payment not clearing down payment request

    Hello,
    I'm working to configure milestone billing plans in our sandbox environment. I'm able to create a sales order with the new order type that's linked to the billing plan, and I have successfully created the down payment request. I can see the two FM postings for value type 83 (the negative to 0100 and the positive to 0200). Then I post the F-29 down payment. I've referenced the sales order in the down payment. But I'm not seeing an FM posting for value type 58 to reduce the down payment request. The down payment request is not being cleared by the down payment. Do you have any suggestions for any of the following:
    - configuration I may have missed
    - information that may have been entered incorrectly on the F-29
    I can see the uncleared down payment itself when I pull up the customer account of the payer. Did I miss a step to match up the F-29 to the down payment request? I've configured the step for automatic down payments in public sector management, and I made sure that the sales order type is the one indicated in that step and the document type of the F-29 is the down payment document type indicated in that step. Any guidance would be appreciated.
    Thank you,
    April

    Check what is the accounting doc type for the down payment request.
    If it is RV then use tcode F-28 to receive payment for the transaction, as you are receiving payment against invoice.
    Hope this can assist you. Or contact your FI team member for understanding.
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • Clearing Down payments through F-58

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    My client has made a down payment of 90% to a vendor by F-48. He wishes to clear the same and pay the remaining amount by using F-58. In F-58 when Spl GL Indicator is given as "A" the down payment is appearing and in simulation also it is showing the full entries i.e. of the down payment, balance payment and the difference amount. But when he goes to post the document, the system is giving an error "Down Payment does not exist." Can anyone help me in this please?

    hi
        down payment made entry(F-48) , after the purchase invoice (TC:F-43) posting  ,,Aafter this step u can transfer the down payment from special gl to recs account throw this TC:F-54 after this step, u can saw this open item (TC:FBL1N),next u can pay the remaining amount throw this (TC:F-58), after the posting this entry u can saw the cleared items in(TC:FBL1N).
       if it's helpful plz assign points
        regards
    sivareddy

  • Clear Down Payments at the time of Invoice Posting

    Hi,
    At the time of invoice posting (customer/vendor) we will a message on exsting down payments.  Is it possible to link the down payment with current invoices??   Please let me the possibilities.
    Thanks
    Partha

    Down payment flow- first we have creatw the sundray creditors nad Advance sundray creditor gl a/c dreation
    2.the link bet sundry creditors and advance sundray creditor in OBYR.
    3. and posting the f-48 advance to vendor
                                 f-43 posting invoive
                                 f-58 transffer to specil gl a/c to normal gl/a/c
                                 f-44 clearing
    and customer also same prosures and link between in sundry debtors and advance debtor and (obyx)

  • Clearing Down Payment on Percentage basis

    Hi MM Experts,
    Please let me know how to configure MM settings such a way that the downpayment is cleared on percentage basis or amount against the partial billing from the Vendor against the single purchase order. Valuable inputs in this regard shall be highly appreciated!  
    Regards!

    hi
    u can give some amount as down payment
    Follow the below mentioned steps for Advance Payment against the PO / Contract;
    1. F-47 - Create Down Payment Request (Here in selection screen specify all the necessary details (Doc Type - KA) and press enter, on this screen specify amount to be paid in advance and also specify the PO Document and line item and SAVE)
    2. F-48 - Down Payment Entry w.r.t. Down Payment Request No
    3. F-54 - Down Payment Clearing
    At the time of MIRO, it will pop-up that advance payment is done to this vendor against this PO.
    Also take help of your FI Consultant if required.
    Note: - Prerequisite for Advance Payment: - Go to FS00, and check Filed Status Group for Vendor Reconciliation Account, then go to OBC4, check the Filed Status Group, what you have maintained for the Vendor reconciliation account. Here go To Material management segment and put optional entry for the field of Purchase Order and save.
    regards
    kunal

  • Applications opening inside Excel when they should use their own setup

    I have downloaded Windows Media player and when I go to open it, the code gets opened in Excel and it does not try to open the installation. Suggestions on how to get the download to execute itself would be appreciated?.
    imac core duo 24in Mac OS X (10.4.8)

    Hi, b.
    1. What browser are you using? I suspect the .bin file in this case is a compressed Mac Binary. Safari should have decompressed this, but you might need the free StuffIt Expander. Tiger, unlike prior versions of Mac OS X, does not include StuffIt Expander: see "Mac OS X 10.4: Where is StuffIt Expander?"
    A free download of StuffIt Expander is available from Smith Micro (nee Allume Systems) here.
    2. Your launch services database may be corrupted. See my "Resetting Launch Services" FAQ.
    3. As FYI, WMP is no longer supported by Microsoft. See Flip4Mac WMV player, which is now available as a Universal Binary for Intel-based Macs.
    Good luck!
    Dr. Smoke
    Author: Troubleshooting Mac® OS X
    Note: The information provided in the link(s) above is freely available. However, because I own The X Lab™, a commercial Web site to which some of these links point, the Apple Discussions Terms of Use require I include the following disclosure statement with this post:
    I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise, from my recommendation or link.

  • What the meaning of Bounding Leaf, and when we should use it

    hi, i have read book about java 3d programming that provide by sun .
    In chapter 3 i read about Bounding Leaf but i can't get the point, would someone explain it to me in simple way and easy to understood?
    thanks

    Basically, when you use, say, a BoundingSphere, you're setting the bounding region to be symmetric about the point (0, 0, 0) of the local coordinate system of the object it is bounding/activiating/scheduling.
    A BoundingLeafNode specifies an alternate coordinate system about which to bound the behavior, allowing to to be non-symmetric, and allowing items in different positions to share the same bounding region.
    The API Specification Guide provides a good example of where this could be useful.
    Let's say you were designing a room with three point lights, in different spots about the room. You want the reqion inside the room to be the bounding region. But each light will see that region differently, because their local coordinate systems are different. A boundingLeafNode would define the room from a single local coordinate system, and all the lights would see that region the same.
    Ok, you say, but you could still have used a BoundingBox object. Correct. But now imagine that there are 30 lights. I certainly don't want to design 30 Bounding Boxes so that each one specifies the room in it's own coordinate system. And imagine if these lights were moving. Lets say you want to simulate a disco-ball. Now, the bounding region would have to change each time the lights move. But not if the bounding region is specified by a static coordinate system.
    That should give you a pretty good idea of what the advantages are.
    - Adam

  • When we should use JAAS?

    Hi
    Thank you for reading my post
    Is it suitable to use JAAS to design and develope a security and authentication framework?
    thanks

    I don't think there are clear guidelines available, however here is my view.
    1) OSB 11gR1 is not certified with Oracle JMS Adapter. It is certified with Oracle FTP, Database, AQ and application adapters.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/doc.1111/e15867/interop.htm#OSBAG1403
    2) In addition of the Weblogic JMS, OSB can also integrate with following provider without using adapter.
    - WebSphere MQ
    - Tibco EMS
    3) if you need to integrate JMS with BPEL Process or Oracle SOA suite composite, it has built in support for generic Oracle JMS adapter. Oracle generic JMS adapter can integrate with AQ JMS (JMS providers OJMS 8.1.7, 9.0.1.4, and 9.2), TIBCO JMS, IBM Websphere MQSeries (IBM MQSeries JMS 6.0), Weblogic JMS, Apache, and Active MQ
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14571_01/integration.1111/e10231/adptr_jms.htm
    4) If you need to integrate OSB with Weblogic JMS, WebSphere MQ, Tbco EMS it does not need JMS adapter.
    Hope this helps !!!
    Jayesh Patel
    http://jayesh-patel.blogspot.com/
    http://www.yagnasys.com/

  • When should use request scope

    hi
    i don't know when i should use request scope, the example is use session scope always.
    Can anyone help me?
    thanks!

    SpiderFromMars wrote:
    > What are the best practices for using the variables
    scope versus using the
    > request scope when assigning variables.
    >
    > In other words, when should I use <cfset variables.x
    = 'barf'> and when
    > should I use <cfset request.x = 'barf'>?
    >
    The variables scope is only accessible in the current
    template. The
    request scope is accessible in the current template and any
    other
    template, such as a custom tag or include file, that is used
    to build
    the current request.
    I.E
    <!---index.cfm--->
    <cfset variable.x = "foo">
    <cfset request.x = "bar">
    <cfoutput>#variable.x##request.x#</cfoutput>
    <cf_myCustomTag>
    <!---myCustomTag.cfm--->
    <cfset variable.x = "bob">
    <cfoutput>#variable.x##request.x#</cfoutput>

Maybe you are looking for