Which Macbook Pro should I get (Iris Pro or no Iris Pro?)

I have an outdated MBP (2009) and want to get a newer one. I use it mostly for work --- web/editing images but expect to occasionally need to edit videos as related to my job.
I am looking at refurbished and it's between:
Refurbished 15.4-inch MacBook Pro 2.0GHz Quad-core Intel i7 with Retina Display for $1659. This one has Iris graphics
http://store.apple.com/us/product/FE...retina-display
or
Refurbished 15.4-inch MacBook Pro 2.3GHz Quad-core Intel i7 with Retina Display. No Iris Pro. $60 cheaper.
http://store.apple.com/us/product/FC...retina-Display
So, I guess my question is do I need Iris Pro for my purposes? I don't know much about computers but it looks like the processor on the one with Iris Pro Graphics is slower. Is that right?
Thanks.

I would choose the first one.

Similar Messages

  • Which MacBook Air should I get? 13 inch or 11 inch

    I want a MacBook Air for Reaktor 5, uploading videos to YouTube with iMovie, stuff I cannot do on my iPad, games (Assassins Creed, Bioshock), web browsing, etc. Should I get the Refurbished MacBook Air 11 inch 128gb SSD 4gb RAM intel core i7 2.0 ghz, or refurbished Macbook Air 13 inch 256gb SSD 4gb RAM intel core i5 1.8ghz. I am 12 years old so I need something more portable than the MacBook Pros.

    If you can afford, buy a new MB Air 13-inch with 256 GB storage and 8GB RAM.
    Otherwise go for "refurbished Macbook Air 13 inch 256gb SSD 4gb RAM intel core i5 1.8ghz".

  • Which Macbook Air should i get? 11 or 13 inch model

    Im 14 and i need a new computer. Mostly i use my computer for browsing, email, twitter, listening music, youtube and sometimes gaming. I like light laptops that i can when im in my bed, when im laying in sofa,... But now i cant decide what model should i get 11 or 13 inch model. I hope u guys  can help me.
                                                                                                                                                                 Jessica

    Hi Jessica,
    I think that the deciding factor concerning which size to get would be how you intend to use it.  People who tote their macbooks around alot, such as sales people or executives (road warriors) and also students who need to take their computers to school, surely would benefit from the smaller 11inch version.  In your case, if you are going to use it in a comfortable environment, such as in bed, or on the sofa, the larger 13inch model would be more beneficial,especially if you watch videos and play games fairly often.  Even if you lug it around a little, to Starbucks or a friends house, or take it with you on vacation once in a while, I feel the larger model would be suitable for you.

  • Which MacBook Air should I get?

    Somebody wants to buy me a MacBook Air as a present because I will be doing volunteer work starting in January helping some disabled people learn to use Macs on Sundays.
    I wonder which I should get.
    Does anybody know the difference between these two models (see screenshot - it's Japanese, but you should get the gist of it). One has 256 SSD and one has 256 "Flash Storage."  What's the difference? Is one just an older model?
    Should I add a little extra and go for a Pro model?
    This would be a "2nd computer" for me for travel and when out of the office. My main computer is my iMac.
    Opinions welcome!
    Thanks,
    Doug

    Apple MacBook Air 13-inch (Mid 2013) MD760 / MD761
    http://alatest.com/reviews/laptop-reviews/apple-macbook-air-md760ll-a-13-3-inch- laptop-newest-version/po3-200839803,30/
    http://www.aido.com/eshop/cl_2-c_278-pr_10856-p_112-i_11652/computers/laptops-an d-netbooks/apple-laptops/new-apple-macbook-air-13.3-inch-led-laptop-md232.html#. UrJTEvbe6Xw
    Network:Wi-Fi wireless networking (based on 802.11n specification, 802.11a/b/g compatible)
    http://www.kogan.com/au/buy/apple-macbook-air-13-13ghz-i5-256gb-md761/
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMkrKnd70EE
    You asked~~One has 256 SSD and one has 256 "Flash Storage."
    Same thing, that just means the very same thing
    Get the 2013 model much better
    2013 differences:
    2013 model has 802AC wifi, much faster
    dual mics
    cooler Haswell processor
    longer battery life
    id call Apple again to verify the models are the same, I dont speak Japanese, but from the pics, you can tell, because the 2012 dont have dual mics on the left side, 2013 does

  • Should i get a antivirus for my mac pro

    should i get a antivirus for my mac pro?

    1. This comment applies to malicious software ("malware") that's installed unwittingly by the victim of a network attack. It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to the victim's computer. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it. If you have reason to suspect that you're the target of such an attack, you need expert help.
    2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files, and to block insecure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user, but internally Apple calls it "XProtect." The malware recognition database is automatically checked for updates once a day; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
    The following caveats apply to XProtect:
    It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets (see below.)
    It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
    3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been another layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't actually been tested by Apple (unless it comes from the Mac App Store), but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. For most practical purposes, applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed can be considered safe.
    Gatekeeper doesn't depend on a database of known malware. It has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
    It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
    A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could find some other way to evade Apple's controls.
    For more information about Gatekeeper, see this Apple Support article.
    4. Beyond XProtect and Gatekeeper, there’s no benefit, in most cases, from any other automated protection against malware. The first and best line of defense is always your own intelligence. All known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore amounts to a battle of wits between you and the malware attacker. If you're smarter than he thinks you are, you'll win.
    That means, in practice, that you never use software that comes from an untrustworthy source. How do you know whether a source is trustworthy?
    Any website that prompts you to install a “codec,” “plug-in,” "player," "extractor," or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one, is untrustworthy.
    A web operator who tells you that you have a “virus,” or that anything else is wrong with your computer, or that you have won a prize in a contest you never entered, is trying to commit a crime with you as the victim. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn visitors who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
    Pirated copies or "cracks" of commercial software, no matter where they come from, are unsafe.
    Software of any kind downloaded from a BitTorrent or from a Usenet binary newsgroup is unsafe.
    Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, must be downloaded directly from the developer’s website. If it comes from any other source, it's unsafe.
    5. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related, despite the similarity of the names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform for running complex applications in a web page, on the client. That was never a good idea, and Java's developers have had a lot of trouble implementing it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been to a Windows-style "virus" affecting OS X. Merely loading a page with malicious Java content could be harmful. Fortunately, Java on the Web is mostly extinct. Only a few outmoded sites still use it. Try to hasten the process of extinction by avoiding those sites, if you have a choice.
    Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and by Oracle (the developer of Java.) Don't use either one unless you need it. Most people don't. If Java is installed, disable it — not JavaScript — in your browsers. In Safari, this is done by unchecking the box marked Enable Java in the Security tab of the preferences dialog.
    Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java on the Web can't be trusted. If you must use a Java applet for a specific task, enable Java only when needed for the task and disable it immediately when done. Close all other browser windows and tabs, and don't visit any other sites while Java is active. Never enable Java on a public web page that carries third-party advertising. Use it only on well-known, password-protected, secure websites without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you'll see a lock icon in the address bar with the abbreviation "https" when visiting a secure site.
    Follow these guidelines, and you’ll be practically as safe from malware as you can be.
    6. Never install any commercial "anti-virus" or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they all do more harm than good, if they do any good at all. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use the free software ClamXav — nothing else.
    Why shouldn't you use commercial "anti-virus" products?
    Their design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere.
    In order to meet that nonexistent threat, the software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
    By modifying the operating system, the software itself may create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
    7. ClamXav doesn't have these drawbacks. That doesn't mean it's entirely safe. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so will corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
    ClamXav is not needed, and should not be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful only for detecting Windows malware. Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else.
    A Windows malware attachment in email is usually easy to recognize. The file name will often be targeted at people who aren't very bright; for example:
    ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥!!!!!!!H0TBABEZ4U!!!!!!!.AVI♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.exe
    ClamXav may be able to tell you which particular virus or trojan it is, but do you care? In practice, there's seldom a reason to use ClamXav unless a network administrator requires you to run an anti-virus application.
    8. The greatest harm done by anti-virus software, in my opinion, is in its effect on human behavior. It does little or nothing to protect people from emerging threats, but they get a false sense of security from it, and then they may behave in ways that expose them to higher risk. Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.
    9. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use in the Sharing preference pane. All are disabled by default.

  • Which Macbook Air should I go with?

    I want to get an 11 inch Macbook Air, but do not know which one I should get.  Do you think the $999 Air (1.6ghz i5 processor, 2GB memory, 64GB flash storage) will be efficient using final cut and adobe illustrator? I create small video clips/highlights, slideshows and edit photos for my job a lot.  Or Should I get a more expensive air like the $1,199 (1.6ghz i5 processor, 4GB memory, 128GB flash storage)? Or even an upgraded Air with 1.8ghz, i7 processor, 256GB flash storage?  I will NOT use this computer to store music or any other types of media other than short video clips and photos.  I also have a large external hard drive to store any work I am finished with.  I'm on the road a lot so I need something small.  Thank you for your help!

    Get a a model with 4gb of ram. You can't upgrade it once you've bought the laptop (it's soldered to the main board) and OS X Lion uses a lot of ram. 2gb will work, but it can become painfully slow at times, specially when you edit videos or photos.
    The $1,199 model you quoted seems to be the best choice for what you need.

  • Which IPad model should I get?

    Hi,
    I am considering buying an IPad for school and I don't know what to get. I need help choosing which one I should get.
    I have concerns for these things:
    ~ 3g or Wifi only? I have no Internet at home and no other sources for Internet. I currently go to a family members house to use Wifi.
    ~ IPad or IPad 2? I do not know which one is better. I am currently leaning towards the IPad 2, but I would like a second opinion.
    ~ 16gb, 32gb, or 64gb? I only put apps, a few TV shows, music, voice memos, and notes currently on my iPod touch (32gb).
    ~ Where should I get it? Should I buy it over the Internet or in-store? If I buy it from the Internet, I will most likely buy it from the Apple Store.
    ~ Can you engrave it in a store? Could an IPad be engraved when you buy it from a store and then be shipped to you?
                                     --thank you for trying to answer these questions!

    What are all the differences between the iPad 3rd Gen and the iPad 2? Is the iPad 2 worth the cost savings?
    http://everymac.com/systems/apple/ipad/ipad-faq/differences-between-ipad-3rd-gen -2012-ipad-2-2011.html
    What are all the differences between the iPad 3rd Gen models? Which should I buy?
    http://everymac.com/systems/apple/ipad/ipad-faq/differences-between-ipad-3rd-gen -early-2012-models.html
    Should I Buy a New iPad? Or an iPad 2?
    http://www.maclife.com/article/blogs/should_i_buy_new_ipad_or_ipad_2
    iPad 3 vs iPad 2 vs iPad 1- Feature comparisons with iOS 5
    http://ipadhelp.com/ipad-help/ipad-3-vs-ipad-2/
    iPad Q&A
    http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/ipad/ipad-faq/differences-between-ipad-3rd -gen-early-2012-models.html
    A Few Questions (and Answers) About the New iPad
    http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/15/a-few-questions-and-answers-about-the-   new-ipad/?ref=personaltechemail&nl=technology&emc=edit_ct_20120315
    New iPad: A Polishing of the Old
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/15/technology/personaltech/the-new-ipad-is-much-t he-same-only-better.html?nl=technology&emc=edit_ct_20120315
    iPad 1, 2 and New Specifications
    http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/ipad/index-ipad-specs.html
    16GB vs 32GB vs 64GB: Which new iPad storage capacity should you get?
    http://www.imore.com/2012/03/08/16gb-32gb-64gb-ipad-capacity/
    How much content will fit on my iPod or iPhone?
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1867
    If you think you may get an iPad 2:
    Refurbished iPad Prices
    http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/ipad
    New 16GB iPad 2 Prices
    http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_ipad/family/ipad/select_ipad2
    When iOS 6 comes out in the fall, the iPad 3 will get Siri, but the iPad 2 won't.
     Cheers, Tom

  • I would like to make animated short cartoons for youtube and facebook.  Which Adobe product should I get?

    I want to make animated short cartoons.  Which product should I get?

    Depends on the look and type of cartoon. Anything from Photoshop to Flash to After Effects.
    Mylenium

  • Which cooling pad should I get for my MacBook Pro?

    I have the mid 2012 Mac Pro (the $1500 one) and now it is going to get hot in my country.Like around 110F and it is 92 and my Mac is starting to get really hot.So I was thinking of which cooling pad I should get.

    Try the MacBook forums
    MacBook Pro
    https://discussions.apple.com/community/notebooks/macbook_pro 
    https://discussions.apple.com/community/mac_os?view=discussions
    http://www.apple.com/support/macbookpro

  • Which Macbook Pro should i get for use with Solidworks?

    I want to get a Macbook Pro but unsure whether to go for the higher end 13 inch or the lower end 15 inch.
    I will be running Solidworks(CAD) a lot as im in my final year of an engineering degree.
    Has anyone got either and had any problems etc?
    Thanks

    Yes, the MBP you've suggested will do fine with MainStage but at the same time, I'd recommend you getting the fastest machine you can realistically afford as MS is still a very resource-hungry beast.....especially once you get to know it and decide that you want to do extra stuff that you didn't originally intend to do with it!
    I also run a MOTU Ultralite MK3 and can recommend this as a very good bang-for-buck interface.....especially the new hybrid model (which I don't have) that has both firewire AND USB. Apart from Apogee interfaces - which are apparently phenomenal (and phenomenally expensive!) - I've also heard extremely good things about the RME Fireface 400 and 800 interfaces.
    But back to the MOTU Ultralite MK3: it has heaps of I/O, is half-rack space (so very portable), is bus-powered (with A/C option), has onboard DSP FX, the latency is very low, is easy to set up and use, and is quite affordable for what you're getting. And MOTU is pretty good with tech support and the drivers are very high quality. Can't go wrong, really.
    The only other thing I'll mention about using a MBP is that having a decent screen size can really help if you're using it live at gigs. I have the current top of the line 17" model and really notice the screen size difference compared to friends who have the 13" or 15" models.....there's a HUGE difference in screen "real estate" with the 17" screen.
    BTW, it's rumored that Apple will soon be announcing the next MBP models and so you may want to wait till the end of April before you decide to buy something.

  • Which Macbook pro should I get? 2.53 vs 2.66

    Does anyone have a good reason to get the 2.66 over the 2.53 macbook pro?
    Both are 15" both have 4GB ram
    2.53 3MB cache:
    250GB 5400RPM Hard drive.
    Nvidia 9400M shared graphics.
    1 fan
    2.66 3MB cache:
    320GB 5400RPM Hard drive.
    Nvidia 9400M + 9600M GT (w/dedicated 256MB ram)
    2 fans
    I'm not a game player, I am not sure I'd see a huge speed increase (.13 ghz) and the extra 70GB isn't that enticing. So normally, I'd say it's not worth it, but I wonder if there's other apps that would make use of the 9600GT now that OpenCL has been included in 10.6
    Thoughts please! Convince me to stay at 2.53 or move higher!

    I'm always a proponent of more RAM for performance, but I'm using a late 2007 MBP 2.6 GHz with 4 Gig of RAM and feel that is sufficient for my needs. My biggest users of resources are 2 virtual machines (Fusion 2.0.6 right now, 3.0 within a month I'm planning). I also run XCode occassionally (mostly for iPhone, but sometimes for Mac). Also do some website development with MAMP Pro. To date I've never run low on RAM with this configuration.
    For better Virtual Machine performance I would seriously consider an external drive. No matter how you slice it having 2 OSs use the same drive will create some resource contention. SSDs may pretty much eliminate that with near zero seek time, but it is my understanding SSD write performance is about the same as a 7200 RPM traditional disk.
    What I did to speed up I/O was to purchase a RAID 0 external disk. I am currently using it via Firewire 800. Originally I was connecting it via eSATA (not an option for the newer 15" MBPs) which may have had a bit more performance, but not significant.
    To me the more significant difference between the 2.53 & 2.66 models is the separate graphics card. With Snow Leopard being able to use the processing power in that card for general purposes you will likely see a greater performance difference than just the .13 GHz of the respective CPUs.
    I always try to get the best non-upgradeable specs on a computer as I can afford. As you have implied at some point you can put in more memory or upgrade to a faster hard drive (whatever the technology at the time) but the CPU speed and graphics capabilities are fixed for the life of the computer.

  • Which MacBook Pro should I get?

    I'm gonna do it. Question is, which one?
    The 1.83 is $500 cheaper, which leaves some extra $$ for upgrading RAM, and going with the 100 GB 7200 rpm HD. I'm guessing the performance difference between the 1.83 and the 2.0 would be negligible. However, I noticed the 1.83 has 128 mb of video ram while the 2.0 has 256, and it's not possible to upgrade the 1.83. I'm wondering how significant this will be, especially since I use Aperture and from what I understand it relies heavily on the graphics chip.
    What do you think? Should I go with the 1.83 or bit the bullet and get the 2.0?
    Thanks...

    Thanks for your feedback.
    The question (and I think it's a valid one), is how much of a difference will the extra 128 MB on the video card and the .17 Ghz on the chips make? Will it be noticeable, or simply somethinig that can be measured by speed tests in a lab?
    I know with G5 desktops for example I can't tell a huge difference in day-to-day usage between the dual 2.0 and the dual 2.3. The major speed bumps, in my experience, tend to come from hard drive speed, RAM and graphics chip.

  • What size Macbook Pro should I get?

    My 2012 Macbook Pro recently bit the dust and won't recognize the hard drive. It would cost about as much to ship and fix it than to purchase a new one. I am a commuter student attending Truman State University and take my computer with me on some days. I plan on purchasing a Macbook Air in the near future, and use it for class and my Macbook Pro for the heavy lifting task (writing papers, doing research, online class work, etc.). I do not know which one of the following to purchase. I am financing, so the price does matter but about $10 separates the 15 inch from the 13 inch.
    13-inch: 2.6GHz
    with Retina display
    Specifications
    2.6GHz dual-core Intel Core i5
    Turbo Boost up to 3.1GHz
    8GB 1600MHz memory
    256GB PCIe-based flash storage1
    Intel Iris Graphics
    Built-in battery (9 hours)2
    $1,399.00
    Education financing for 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display 256GB flash storage 2.6GHz dual-core Intel Core i5From $37.53 per month
    13-inch: 2.8GHz
    with Retina display
    Specifications
    2.8GHz dual-core Intel Core i5
    Turbo Boost up to 3.3GHz
    8GB 1600MHz memory
    512GB PCIe-based flash storage1
    Intel Iris Graphics
    Built-in battery (9 hours)2
    $1,699.00
    Education financing for 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display 512GB flash storage 2.8GHz dual-core Intel Core i5From $45.58 per month
    15-inch: 2.2GHz
    with Retina display
    Specifications
    2.2GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
    Turbo Boost up to 3.4GHz
    16GB 1600MHz memory
    256GB PCIe-based flash storage1
    Intel Iris Pro Graphics
    Built-in battery (8 hours)2
    $1,899.00
    Education financing for 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display 256GB flash storage 2.2GHz quad-core Intel Core i7From $50.00 per month
    Thank you so much!

    In my opinion your interests would be best served by a Macbook Air rather than a Macbook Pro.  Unless you are taking a photography/video course or scientific studies that use applications that require lot of CPU/GPU resources, the Air will do everything you need to do very efficiently.  Combine that will the ease of portability and vastly superior battery run time. it is an ideal notebook for college work.  It will also be less expensive!
    Ciao.

  • New macbook pros should I get 802.11g or 802.11n

    I'm about to get one of the new Macbook Pro's with the Intel Core Duo 2's. I'm getting a new wireless router as well. I was planning on getting the Linksys WRT54GL, which is 802.11.
    Would I gain anything by getting an 802.11n router instead? If so, anyone have any recommendations?
    macbook pro 2.16 Intel Core 2 Duo    

    I have the Belkin Pre-N Router and it has been great with my MBP Core Duo. My new Core 2 Duo MBP has a different card and it is working very well also. No one is sure what the nature of the wireless adapter in these new books is, but it appears to be some sort of N-like technology, however, Apple has it behaving as if it is the same as the others. The reason being that there is no established N yet and they are waiting. My guess is that we will receive a firmware update to get them running at N speeds once the specs for N are official. Until then, I would not spend too much money on a Pre-N or Draft N router because it could very well be useless for N speeds when N is released. I got the Belkin for $100 and the speed is very nice and the range is exceptional. Anyhow, that is my two cents...if it's worth that much.

  • What kind of Mac Book Pro should I get as a filmmaker?

    I'm not sure how I should customize a Mac Book Pro so that it would be perfect for editing HD videoclips from an HD camera (like a Canon XH-A1). I want it to last me a long time for the money I'm paying. My budget is no more than $2500 for the computer and all software included.
    I was looking at these specs? Can sdmeone please ell me what I don't need for the MacBook Pro or what I should add to these specs in order for the computer to still be amazing for a filmmaker's needs? Thanks!
    MacBook Pro, 15-inch, Aluminium
    2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    2GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x1GB
    250GB Serial ATA @ 5400
    SuperDrive 8x (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)
    Backlit Keyboard (English) / User's Guide
    Final Cut Express preinstalled
    Accessory kit
    AppleCare Protection Plan for MacBook
    Cart Subtotal: $2,507.00
    This is also my first time dealing with Macs so keep that in mind. Thanks!

    Editing HD-Video is one of the most intensive applications you can run.
    Generally maxing out CPU und RAM should be a priority (Especially RAM since its not that expensive).
    The SSD-Drive might be a good idea (speedwise) to, but it´s very expensive
    Keep in mind that any MBP config should be able to handle the HD-Video. They just take longer on slower models.
    If you are a professional and work wih video all day long you might want to consider an Mac Pro instead of a MacBook Pro.

Maybe you are looking for