Which transport protocol is most efficient in JMS adaptor and why..???

Hi all,
Which transport protocol is most efficient in JMS adaptor and why..???
Also can anyone tell me how to check queues in the integration server and in the reciever side....???
If any one explain it rather than providing any link...i will be delighted...
Thanks....
Biplab

<i>Which transport protocol is most efficient in JMS adaptor and why..???</i>
U have to select the JMS provider for the JMS adapter under Transport Protocol.
The selection of JMS provider could be according to ur cost estimation.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c1/739c4186c2a409e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
SONIQ MQ and IBM MQ series r widely used
<i>Also can anyone tell me how to check queues in the integration server and in the reciever side....???</i>
smq1 - outbound queues
smq2 - inbound queues
Regards,
Prateek

Similar Messages

Which compiler genrerates the most efficient code?

Does anybody know which compiler genrates the most efficient code? Jikes or javac? Or are there others more powerfull? If anybody has any information please submit a link to some benchmark test. I have tried both compilers, and I think that Jikes is compiling clearly faster, but does that mean that it is sloppy or doesn't it mean anything.

It's not so much the comiler but rather the jvm that is responsible for speed issues.
Of course if the compiler generates crappy bytecodes it doesn't help. But finally the jvm does the optimizing and running...

I just downloaded Firefox 6.0. The web page asked if I wanted to upgrade. What is the most recent version of Firefox and why can't I get it denoted in the propperties link? Also why is it not compatible with AVG Tool Bar?

I just downloaded Firefox 6.0. The web page asked if I wanted to upgrade. What is the most recent version of Firefox and why can't I get it denoted in the propperties link? Also why is it not compatible with AVG Tool Bar?

Firefox 6.0 is the current version.
Get what denoted in what properties link.
You can get the version number in Help -> About Firefox,
and in '''about:support''' typed into the Location bar, and you can use JavaScript to list the user agent -- javascript:navigator.userAgent
I'm not aware of any version of Firefox from Fx 2 on up to Fx 6 where "AVG Safe" is not a problem. Crashes aren't the only failures caused.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Problematic_extensions
* https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/blocked/
* https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/blocked/i6
* https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527135

Which one is the most efficient - ODI or DIM?

Hi,
Which is the most efficient of ODI&DIM to use as a middleware between Relational DB and Hyperion Planning? Please do let me know the benifits of them?
Thanks,
Luv

Hello, thanks for your rapid answer.
I have a macBook Pro (15"), with a Intel 2,3Ghz Core I7. 4Go 1700 Mhz DDR3. NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M 512 Mo, and OS X 10.8.4.
I have the following ports: FireWire 800, Thunderbolt, USB 3 (x2), SDXC card slot, audio In and audio out (headphones).
I bought a Belkin Mini DisplayPort to HDTV Cable (https://discussions.apple.com/message/22742775?ac_cid=op123456#22742775)
I have an HD TV from LG 32LH3000, with 3 HDMI inputs. I regularly use one of these HDMI input to watch movies, stored on an HDD.
Thanks again for your help.

Which sorting technique is most efficient?

Which of these four sorting technique is most efficient, And why?
Bubble sort, Insertion sort, or, Merge sort?
Just getting some opinions.

georgemc wrote:
punter wrote:
ejp wrote:
No need to actively mislead him thanks.I have given him my opinion,which he had asked for and not a hard and fast fact.If he is dumb enough to believe it,may be he deserves that.But what about the innocent noob who, in the course of doing the right thing and googling, comes across this thread and takes your opinion to be canon?Then they are dumb enough to be pushed out of the profession as well. Punter said this:
Bubble sort. Why ? Because I like that name "Bubble Sort".
It's not only obvious he's not being serious, it's equally obvious that he wasn't even trying to pretend to be serious.
His answer was like somebody asking "how fast is Java" and you answering "7". It's just too obviously non-applicable to the question to cause any harm.
Plus, he went on to encourage to the OP to do some research to test the validity of his own statement. Which is anything but misleading.
Edited by: endasil on 22-Dec-2009 12:21 PM

Which spanning tree protocol is preferred PVST or rapid-PVST and why?

I have WS-C2960G-24TC-L and Cisco 3750G switches, I have option to configure PVST spanning tree or rapid-pvst. Please let me know which is better and why? also send me some document explaining both protocols in detail.

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
As Alex has noted, normally rapid-PVST should be preferred.
Depending on needs (and device support), MST might be better yet.

Which one of these two drives would you recommend and why

Hello,
I am planning on adding an external HD to be used with Time Machine.
I was looking at a WD My Book Studio LX 2 TB FireWire 800, then I saw another WD - 2 TB My Book Studio II.
While the first look very nice and sleek with its aluminum case, and judging by WD website, offers more features, the second one seem to be faster (7200 rpm vs 5400 rpm) and it also offers 5 years of warranty compared with only 3.
I am not a computer geek, therefore I am throwing the question here: which one should I buy and why? Do I really need that RAID technology?
Thanks in advance for your answers.
Regards,
Loerincz

IMHO, you want neither. I've heard enough bad things about WD drives on these forums that I wouldn't touch them with a ten-foot pole. Try [Other World Computing|http://www.macsales.com>. They've got quality stuff.
As for RAID, you probably don't need that. RAID is a way to make multiple separate drives act like one larger drive, but that's major overkill for most home backup needs.

Transport Protocol Support by CIDX,IDOC,JMS Adapter

Hi Frnds,
I want how many protocol formats support by below adapters
JMS
IDOC
CIDX
MAIL
can any one help me..
Regards,
raj

Transport protocols;
CIDX - HTTP 1.1 and HTTPS at sender and Receiver side
JMS - Sonic MQ JMS provider, Websphere MQ(non JMS), Access JMS prov with JNDI, Acces JMS prov generically, (Read)JMS provider administerd Objects from file---at sender and Reciever side
Mail - SMTP and IMAP4 at receiver side
IMAP4 and POP3 at sendr side
IDOC - File at sender side
tRFC and File at receiver side
Regards,
Kiran Bobbala

How to go from Firewire 800 or Thunderbolt to HDMI? Which one is the most efficient?, How to go from Firewire 800 or Thunderbolt to HDMI? Which one is the most efficient?

I have no HDMI port on my macbook, but only Thunderbolt and FireWire 800, and I need to connect to my digital TV that requires an HDMI port.

Hello, thanks for your rapid answer.
I have a macBook Pro (15"), with a Intel 2,3Ghz Core I7. 4Go 1700 Mhz DDR3. NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M 512 Mo, and OS X 10.8.4.
I have the following ports: FireWire 800, Thunderbolt, USB 3 (x2), SDXC card slot, audio In and audio out (headphones).
I bought a Belkin Mini DisplayPort to HDTV Cable (https://discussions.apple.com/message/22742775?ac_cid=op123456#22742775)
I have an HD TV from LG 32LH3000, with 3 HDMI inputs. I regularly use one of these HDMI input to watch movies, stored on an HDD.
Thanks again for your help.

Which is better? Photoshop CS6 or Elements? And why?

Wife is an avid photographer and likes to be able to fix photos, make collages. Confused on which is better, Photoshop CS6 (and what is Extended?) or Elements? What are the pros and cons of each? Thank you for your time.

The Photoshop & Elements users hang out in those software forums. You should post there. This area is for MBP technical problems.

Most efficient way to open a new TextEdit doc at a specific place

Suppose I've navigated in the Finder to some deep dark location in the folder hierarchy... I want a new text file titled "notes" in this folder, i.e. to this path.
Assuming TextEdit is already open, what is the most efficient way of creating and begin adding text to a new TextEdit file in that location?
Tried this: Maybe the usual Save dialog is aware of the current folder, so I can choose "New Document" in TextEdit's Dock icon pulldown, and then choose that path when I do File --> Save, choose the Save dialog's expanded view, and pull down the Where: selection. Nope. The current path is not there.
Tried this: Keeping an empty TextEdit document named untitled on my desktop. Drag-copying that to the current folder. Rename the file to "notes", open it, and start editing That works, except it is clumsy.
Is there a better way?
Please forgive me if I'm missing something incredibly obvious.

The problem with that is a new file has nothing in it.
If you save a dummy file on the desktop someplace or use a real file in each of your locations, you could right click and duplicate it, then doubleclick to open it in the program of choice.
Another option would to be to create a AppleScript that took the current open windows pathname and create and save a Textfile there.
You save the app in the Dock and only have to click on it once, it automatically quits when mission accomplished.

Regarding JMS Adaptor

Hi @,
I need to know details related to JMS adaptor and their config
Regards

Check these links will be very helpfull
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/4d/a3bc97ff55c742af7faed661635baf/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bankanalyzer50/helpdata/en/10/b1b4c8575a6e47954ad63438d303e4/content.htm
http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/SAP%20XI%20adapters_DS.pdf#search=%22JMS%20adapter%20with%20XI%22
Confi recv JMS adapter:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/10/b1b4c8575a6e47954ad63438d303e4/content.htm
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/07/04/read-excel-instead-of-xml-through-fileadapter
/people/kan.th/blog/2007/02/05/exploring-jms-and-sap-xi-jms-adaper
/people/alessandro.guarneri/blog/2006/01/04/jms-sender-adapter-handling-too-short-lines
/people/william.li/blog/2006/11/13/how-to-use-saps-webas-j2ees-jms-queue-in-exchange-infrastructure
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f02d12a7-0201-0010-5780-8bfc7d12f891

Is there any way to send IDOC in one line through JMS Adaptor?

Hi Frnds,
I have an issue with JMS adaptor and it is as folllow:
I configured JMS sender Communicaiton Channel and its working fine but client wants header and item records in one line with out any lines in between these records. Is it possible to send Header and Item records in one line through JMS Sender?
Thanks
Rajeev.

Rajeev,
The XSL is generally created via an XML development tool and then imported to the design as an Imported Archive. Then in your Interface Mapping select a mapping program of type XSL and choose your XSL mapping.
FYI - Here is a simplified version of Michals blog.
I have created cdata.xml as input.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<aa>
<bb>1</bb>
     <cc>1</cc>
     <cc>2</cc>
     <cc>3</cc>
</aa>
The XSL mapping program cdata.xsl
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
     <xsl:template match="/">
          <inside>

                    <xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes"><![CDATA[<![CDATA[]]></xsl:text>
                    <xsl:copy-of select="aa"/>
                    <xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes"><![CDATA[]]]]></xsl:text>
                    <xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes"><![CDATA[>]]></xsl:text>

          </inside>
     </xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
And the result
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<inside><![CDATA[<aa><bb>1</bb><cc>1</cc><cc>2</cc><cc>3</cc></aa>]]></inside>
The strikethrough is an interpretation of the forum editor.
The actual result is square bracket <aa><bb>1</bb><cc>1</cc><cc>2</cc><cc>3</cc></aa> square bracket
Using the above code you can test this and see for yourself
The idea would to pass the single string to JMS.
This should get you over the line. Also refer to XI / PI help to clarify XSL mapping.
Regards,
Mike

Missing AQ and JMS Transport protocols

Hi,
It seems that after a Purge the AQ and JMS transport protocols have disappeared from the user interface. I recall something similar happened with the SFTP protocol a few patches ago. That could be solved by running $ORACLE_HOME/jdk/bin/java oracle.tip.seed.SFTPSeedDriver. Can something similar be done for the AQ and JMS transport protocols?
Thanks

Thanks for the reply.
the patch number is 7556011.
It is possible that it is as you say and something went wrong during patching. I assumed it was deleted because of the Purge since the AQ and JMS were missing similar to the SFTP case described earlier. When comparing the transport protocols with another installation (with the same patch level and that has not had any purges done) only these two protocols were missing. Worth noting is that the SFTP and TCP transport protocols are still visible in the GUI.

Most Efficient Adapter

Hi All,
I am interested to know that for example if we are asked to transfer data in below scenarios which adapters are most efficient and why.
ECC to Third Party system
Third Party to Third Party system
Third Party to ECC system
Say you have the choice to choose which Third Party system you would recommend to the client for most efficient data transfer and why would that be? From all the standard SAP adapters like File or SFTP or SOAP or JMS or JDBC. I do understand that business need would come up as the first criteria but if are solely responsible for suggesting the client which is the best option. Transfer data from DB using JDBC or simple File transfer or SFTP or via web using SOAP adapater. Also do mention your reason for such suggestion.
Regards,
Shaibayan

Hi,
Check with your third party system ,what protocol it supports .
Some only supports FTP if they have file server installed in there machine .If the third party system is outside your BLAN then you need to make sure ports open b/w your machine and third machine to communicate .We do have FTP/SFTP/FTPS flavors in file transfer .
If they want to insert into there db then you can propose for JDBC/SOAP.
If they want to communicate from web then propose HTTP/HTTPS
If they have JMS queues/Topics go with JMS
When comes to SAP ECC it supports IDoc/RFC/Proxy
give 1st preference to Proxy for async scenarios,if you have standard IDoc then go with IDoc.If you have huge payload go with proxy.
//ly for synchronous scenarios go with proxy first,if insisted for rfc then go with that.
Frankly speakings many factors will impact on coming to conclusion .Discussions with end systems/business req narrow down the options.
Regards
Venkat

Which transport protocol is most efficient in JMS adaptor and why..???

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for