WIA support for the Canon MX922

Is there a WIA driver for the Canon MX922 multifunction printer? It doesn't respond to my version of Photoshop which requiresa scanner that is WIA compliant.

Hello.
The MX922 uses a TWAIN driver for scanning.
For many of the latest versions of Photoshop, a TWAIN plugin would have to be installed in order to use a TWAIN scanner with the program. Please visit www.adobe.com for information on how to update the plugin for your version of Photoshop.
If additional assistance is needed, feel free to call us at 1-800-OKCANON.
Did this answer your question? Please click the Accept as Solution button so that others may find the answer as well.

Similar Messages

What is going on with tethered support for the canon 70D?

I just saw the release of Lightroom CC, and it appears that the Canon 70D is still not supported for tethering. This camera has been on the market for almost 2 years, and there have been several releases of Lightroom, including this major one. What is going on here? This is a major feature that is missing and a huge inconvenience to workaround. When will this be fixed? What is holding it up?

This information is a couple of years old, so I can not vouch for how current it is. But it may be worth a try.
ColdFusion's Dedicated Account Managers
October 9, 2007
http://www.forta.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/10/9/ColdFusions-Dedicated-Account-Managers
Just a reminder (especially for those of you whose experiences when calling Adobe sales regarding ColdFusion were anything less than stellar) ...
Adobe has dedicated ColdFusion Account Managers (in the U.S. and Canada), all they do is ColdFusion, and they can help with purchasing, EULA and pricing questions, and more. Here are the contact details:
For users in AK, AR, AZ, CA, CO, HI, IA, ID, IL, KS, LA, MN, MO, MT, ND, NE, NM, NV, OK, OR, SD, TX, UT, WA, WI, WY (West of the Mississippi), ping Jason Graves at [email protected] or call (858) 847-7541.
For users in AL, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, IN, KY, MD, MA, ME, MI, MS, NC, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, SC, TN, VA, VT, WV (East of the Mississippi) as well as Eastern Canada & Ontario, ping Dominick Conte at [email protected] or call (858) 847-7451.
[revised]

Now Here! Support for the Canon PowerShot G1

After much trial and error, I have figured out how to support the Canon PowerShot G1.
I started with the settings for the hacked un-supported G2 (thanks to user jpugsley for this message: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=262930). Then I read the source code to the open source dcraw.c command line raw convertor. There I found Adobe's translation values for the G1 which has a CYGM filter array. I'd say this opens up opportunities for many other CYGM cameras to be supported.
The premul values seem to affect the color balance of the images. Adjusting the values very slightly may be helpful. I don't know what most of the other values are. The m2 array values came from dcraw.c You probably shouldn't touch those.
The images seem to open fine in Preview and Aperture. I hope Apple officially supports this camera soon (Aperture 1.1?).
How To:
All you have to do is paste the following XML into this file (make sure you save a backup of the file first). Rebooting is NOT needed:
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Frameworks/ImageIO.fram ework/Versions/Current/Resources/Raw.plist
<key>Canon-PowerShot G1</key>
<dict>
<key>blackReplace</key> <true/>
<key>black</key> <integer>32</integer>
<key>max</key> <integer>1023</integer>
<key>white</key> <integer>1023</integer>
<key>premul0</key> <real>1.00</real> <key>premul1</key> <real>1.2</real> <key>premul2</key> <real>1.1</real> <key>premul3</key> <real>1.11</real>
<key>m1</key>
<array>
<real>1.0507</real> <real>-0.4281</real> <real>-0.0161</real>
<real>-0.5540</real> <real>1.2938</real> <real>0.2909</real>
<real>-0.1205</real> <real>0.1844</real> <real>0.8335</real>
<real>-0.1566</real> <real>1.1051</real> <real>0.0577</real>
</array>
<key>m2</key>
<array>
<real>-0.4778</real> <real>0.9467</real> <real>0.2172</real>
<real>0.4743</real> <real>-0.1141</real> <real>0.4344</real>
<real>-0.5146</real> <real>0.9908</real> <real>0.6077</real>
<real>-0.1566</real> <real>1.1051</real> <real>0.0577</real>
</array>
<key>mc</key> <real>0.83355</real>
<key>otrc</key>
<array>
<real>0.00</real> <real>0.090</real> <real>1.467</real> <real>0.260</real> <real>1.842</real> <real>0.652</real> <real>1.040</real> <real>0.538</real>
</array>
</dict>

This is stellar.
Thanks. It wasn't as hard as I thought it would be... I didn't think it was possible at first.
is this in fact all
there is to supporting a new camera RAW format --
providing a translation array in a plist file?
What follows is pure speculation... I really don't have a solid understanding of this at all.
Seems like all you have to do is get these Camera->XYZ trans values (trans may stand for transform or translate). The image is essentially monochrome with color filters over it. Some cameras use RGB filters, looks like Apple has supported a lot of those. Some are CYGM, so far Apple hasn't supported any of those. Apple has supported the Sony DSC F828 which is RGBE where E stands for Emerald. Total guess, but each set of three values in the m2 array is associated with a color. (9 total for RGB and 12 for CYGM and RGBE). Guessing, each of these sets of three values probably is used to calculate a response curve for each color.
Basically, when dcraw.c provided twelve values, I began to poke around Raw.plist and discovered the Sony F828 camera also had 12 values in its m2 array. It also had 4 premul (pre-multiplier) values, one for each set of 3 m2 values. So I took a leap of faith that CYGM could be supported because after all, a color is just a color. Does the computer really care if the value represents emerald or magenta? This produced a promising image but color was way off. I had to then tweak each premul value to bring the color in. Those values don't seem to be linear. A minor adjustment can either dramatically change everything or have no noticeable effect.
Are all RAW formats essentially supported via simply a
declarative filter array, or did it just happen to
work for G1 RAW, and other formats are different?
My amateur guess is many cameras are similar and a few stand out as different. For example, I'm guessing the Foveon cameras are an example of a different sort of RAW file. Thats just a guess based on looking at dcraw.c.
if this is all there is to
supporting a new RAW format, I wonder
- why more of the RAW formats weren't supported in the first place.
To get you to buy a fancy new camera on the Apple Store? Lazyness? Not enough time? Lack of cooperation from the manufacturer? All of the above?
- why RAW formats haven't been progressively added
since the Aperture release.
Seems like they could have had support for dozens of additional cameras. This took me only a matter of hours to figure out. Someone with a deep understanding could have done this in minutes.
The real time sink is when you almost have the colors correct and you are endlessly tweaking trying to get them perfect... as you will see, the colors will be fine in certain exposures and way off in others. Look at daylight vs. tungsten photos. It may take many hours to get the values of the camera correct to customers exacting standards. We, the photographers, are very picky.
Why don't we just contact Canon, Nikon, etc. and get
their translation values?
There are values for 83 additional cameras that aren't supported by Apple in the dcraw.c file. That's a place to start.

Will there be raw support for the Canon G10 before CS4?

Not complaining, just asking. I'll upgrade to CS4 eventually, probably sooner if my G10 is not convered in CS3/ACR.
Richard Southworth

Some it is definately that Adobe wants to make you upgrade, they need the
money like all businesses need the money. Anyone that thinks otherwise is
deluding themselves. However, the other part of it too is that with each new
version of Photoshop they add many new features to ACR, not just camera
support but new features. To upgrade the old version of ACR the last one for
CS3 for example they would need to maintain two seperate code bases and that
is a lot of work, that is going to increase the possibility of bugs and
other problems. It is far easier for Adobe to do it once and that is it.
This is why Lightroom and ACR are by and large updated together and why they
share the same code base, they only have invent the wheel once.
Now I am sure there is little reason why Adobe couldn't just make 5.1 work
with CS3. But, that goes back to the whole money thing. I guess you could
say ACR is a privilage and not a right. You earn the privilage to use the
lastest ACR by keeping your updates current.
This time around however, I have to say that Adobe did something that I
approve of very much and that is they release ACR 4.6 for CS3 AFTER CS4
shipped adding support for newer cameras. I would like to see Adobe do this
all of the time. That is do one final ACR update for the previous version of
Photoshop after the new version has shipped. I see this as a sort of thank
you.
Robert

Is there a manual for the canon MX922

Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi JM, thanks for posting1
Click on the link below for access to a free downloadable copy of the user's guide for your MX920 Series printer. Please note that you may need to choose your computer's operating system before downloading. We hope this helps!
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/support/consumer/printers_multifunction/pixma_mx_series/pixma_mx922#Br...

Will there be raw support for the Canon G10 before hell freezes over?

I know, patience. Just gripes my soul the P6000 made it and the G10 didn't. Sigh.
Richard Southworth

<[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected].. > Yes Eric, I understand there's no useful purpose to my post, just > catharsis. > > Richard Southworth Then there is a useful purpose to your post. Stress releif saves lives! Robert

Lightroom 3 does NOT support raw files for the Canon Sureshot S95

Have just bought the new Canon Sureshot S95
after contacting Adobe support I am told Lightroom 3 does NOT support raw files for the
Canon Sureshot S95.
Come on Adobe.....please provide an update asap.

(1) Well Boss I did what you said and used Canon DPP to convert to TIFFs. Choices are 8-bit TIFF or 16-bit TIFF - I chose 16-bit because part (90% part) of the reason for wanting to work in RAW is to keep the bit depth of teh original. On my EOS 40D it is supposedly 14 bits, which gives great scope to play with the levels & curves without seeing poster effects. If I choose 16 bit TIFF then each S95 image becomes a 70MB file, parallel to my JPEG and RAW. Hardly a satisfactory solution.
(I realise, however, that I don't actually know the bit depth of the S95 RAW file - anybody? ).
(2) SUGGESTION- even if you are adding S95 support to the next update (which I dearly hope), be kinder to those with new cameras in general and allow LR to import JPEGs if it cannot import the RAWs (overriding if necessary the 'ignore JPEG' preference setting). I am sure users with that preference would still prefer a JPEG than no picture at all!
Since I discovered this compatibility problem, I switched the camera to record RAW+JPEG*. To my great irritation LR3 ignores the JPEGs even though it cannot load the RAWs. So if I want to import from one supported camera (EOS40D) and one unsupported camera (S95) I have to keep going into preferences to switch on and off the 'ignore JPEG' function.
JJ
* (this seems to be a setting that needs doing in the various different modes of the camera, by the way).

Does LR6 support tethering for the Canon EOS 70D

Hi
does LR finally support tethering for the Canon EOS 70D ?
Uli

Hi Ulrich,
It seems Canon EOS 70D is still not support in Lightroom6.
Please refer the following the list of supported cameras.
Tethered camera support in Lightroom
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sumit Singh

Can't install the software for the Canon MX870 series because it is not currently available from the Software Update server.

I'm trying to setup my Canon MX870 USB ink jet printer plugged into my Airport Extreme's USB port. However, I keep getting a message of; "Can't install the software for the Canon MX870 series because it is not currently available from the Software Update server." And then I have to click cancel.
The "Print & Scan" from System Preferences, can see the printer as it has the NAME: Canon MX870 series, and the LOCATION: 'the name of my network', and USE: MX870 series. But after clicking "Add", it tries to install the software (I've already installed the latest drivers however on my Mac Pro) and that's when I get this message;
"Can't install the software for the Canon MX870 series because it is not currently available from the Software Update server."
Any ideas, help would be greatly appreciated!
Marty

Hello Marty,
It sounds like you are not able to add your Canon printer in System Preferences. I found an article with steps you can take to resolve this:
Resolution
USB printers and Bonjour-enabled network printers
Follow these steps until the issue is addressed:
Make sure that the printer is powered on, has ink / toner, and that there are no alerts on the printer’s control panel. Note: If you cannot clear an alert on the printer's control panel, stop here and check the printer's documentation or contact the manufacturer for support.
Ensure the printer is properly connected to a USB port on the Mac or AirPort base station / Time Capsule. If the printer is a network-capable printer, make sure that it is properly connected to your home network.
Use Software Update to find and install the latest available updates. If an update is installed, see if the issue persists.
Open the Print & Scan pane or Print & Fax (Snow Leopard) pane in System Preferences.
Delete the affected printer, then add the printer again.
If the issue persists, try these additional steps:
Reset the printing system, then add the printer again.
If the issue still persists, reset the printing system again. Download and install your printer's drivers. Then, add the printer again.
Contact the printer vendor or visit their website for further assistance.
You can find the full article here:
Troubleshooting printer issues in OS X
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3147
Thank you for posting in the Apple Support Communities.
Best,
Sheila M.

What easy setup do I use for the Canon A1 1080i60?

What easy setup do I use for the Canon A1 1080i60?

I called tech support and they were no help.
G5 Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Is there an owner's manual for the pixma mx922?

is there an owner's manual for the pixma mx922?

Hi ecolloff,
Did you download the PDF version of the manual from the Recommended for You section, or the other version of the manual from the Guides and Manuals section?
If this is a time-sensitive matter, additional support options are available at Contact Us.
Did this answer your question? Please click the Accept as Solution button so that others may find the answer as well.

Camera Raw for Elements 10 for the Canon EOS 7D MkII? Downloading

Is there a "Camera Raw" for "Elements 10" for the "Canon EOS 7D MkII"?
If so could I please have the link to where I can download it?
Thanks

Hi,
The Canon 7D Mk II is currently not supported by any version of camera raw.
It is expected that Camera raw 8.7 will include support and we are hoping that it will be released soon.
PSE 12 has ceased to be updated - you will either need to update to PSE 13 or use the DNG 8.7 converter (when it becomes available) to convert the CR2 files to DNG files - PSE 12 will then beable to use the DNG files.
Brian

RAW Support for the New EOS 5D

Please update the RAW plug-in to support the new Canon EOS 5D!

Andrew,
Version 3.2 of Camera Raw has unofficial support for the 5D (in other words it works NOW). Download version 3.2 and install it in the PROPER location. If the thumbnails still don't appear you should purge the cache for the folder containing the 5D images - assuming you installed it correctly it WILL work
BTW: if you'd gone to the camera Raw forum you would have already to the above info!

HT203088 Any ideas when RAW support for the Nikon D7200 will be available?

Hi
I have recently bought the Nikon D7200. However Apple have not released their support for the RAW files. I am wondering what the likely timeframe is for support to be released? I do not want to make the switch to Adobe to get support and Nikons software isn't much fun at all so want to avoid that.
In the meantime I am stuck using jpg...
Any realistic timeframe estimates appreciated...
James

It used to be pretty quick with Nikons and Canons - some even before the camera was released! But now in the new Photos regime, we can't really say.

HT4757 RAW support for the SONY RX100?

Anyone know when will Apple be adding RAW support for the SONY RX100?

Unfortunately this is a user forum, so no-one can answer that one for you. You can use the feedback option in aperture to request it though. More than likely it wont come until Canon or Nikon release some more DSLRs, which is usually what prompts an update. For what it's worth you can use the Adobe DNG converter which will convert the sony .arw file into a .dng file that Aperture can read. It is another step to your workflow but you can do it.

WIA support for the Canon MX922

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for