Will java support swings along with sip protocol

sir i want the java and sip protocol to be used aside by aside by aside

Do you mean you want do use SIP from Java? Google for "sip java" and e.g. the first hit is about a SIP API for Java.

Similar Messages

I would like to use tethering for my camera Nikon D610 in lightroom (version 5.4 is installed). When will lightroom support this camera with tethering?

I would like to use tethering for my camera Nikon D610 in lightroom (version 5.4 is installed). When will lightroom support this camera with tethering?

We'll know when it happens, Lucht - software companies don't make support promises in advance.

When will Apple support h.264 with HE-AAC v2 (in AppleTV/Ipad) ?

Hello
When will Apple support h.264 with HE-AAC v2 (in AppleTV/Ipad) ?

Maybe because iPad2 has a faster processor

When will lightroom support tethered shooting with the NIKON D4S?

when will lightroom support tethered shooting with the NIKON D4S?

Okay so I should be asking Adobe direct, thanks.
I did find that Nikon released the developer software for the D4S back in february so just could'nt uderstand the delay especially as adobe never seems to be late taking my money each month.

My phone will not turn on along with its mophie case, which I believe is due to water damage. When it did resppnd, it cited error 1608. Is there a way around this

My phone will not turn on along with its mophie case, which I believe is due to water damage. When it did resppnd, it cited error 1608. Is there a way around this?
Thanks,
Raphael Minot

A way around what?

Hi All , Will Java supports Multiple Inheritance classes???

Hi All ,
Will Java supports Multiple Inheritance by classes???
Thanks in advance,
Prakash

No, Multiple inheritance would look like
public class A extends B,C {(You can do that in C++, but it's rarely a good idea).That's not true at all. It's not inherently harmful, in C++ or any other language. It's entirely possible to do it correctly when it truly makes sense.
Java just guarantees that nothing bad can happen to you by only allowing multiple inheritance of interface. You can't ever have multiple inheritance of implementation, that's all.
%

BBM with SIP Protocol (?)

Is there is a chance for BBM in the future to feature calling to land lines or cell phones? I don't know.. something like SIP protocol or whatever..?
I think it could be a nice advantage and a good way to monitize BBM for business and regular users

Hi Hamed_1983,
Please have a look at below article which talking about a C# based simple SIP (VOIP) call-out phone to see
if it helps.
Simple SIP (VOIP) based phone in C#
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/138484/Simple-SIP-VOIP-based-phone-in-C
Bob Shen
MSDN Community Support | Feedback to us
Develop and promote your apps in Windows Store
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

Will java programs become slower with generics?

This is not a question, more lika general discussion. I'd like to know what you think.
I fear that the average java developer will become accustom to the new features of java and write inefficient code. I have included a sample program that shows new code vs. old code. Altough the new code is esier to read, it's also alot slower.
For instance the foreach instruction is using an iterator which is created and then iterated. When the loop exits the Iterator is garanage collected. Better performance would be achieved if there was a "Getable" interface of some sort was implemented and that the foreach simply asked the collections class for the next object in line. Perhapps if the ArrayList cached it's Iterator objects, somehow. (I'm not suggesting any of the solutions above. I'm just trying to make a point.)
Also regarding generics and enumerations it's easy to see how they will slow down the application. It gets even scarier when you consider that important foundation classes are updated with these new features. A small change in some AWT class may have unforeseen repercussions throughout all gui applications.
Gafter, if you read this, is there any tests made to see if this is true. Is performance affected by the new features? Will old style code be replace by new style code in the foundation classes (awt/swing/.../... etc.).
ArrayList<String> ss = new ArrayList<String>();
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
// "new" java ... completes in 6.43 seconds
long t1 = System.nanoTime();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
     for (String s : ss)
System.out.println(System.nanoTime()-t1);
// "old" java ... completes in 2.58 seconds
long t2 = System.nanoTime();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
     for (int j = 0, size = ss.size(); j < size; j++)
          String s = ss.get(j);
System.out.println(System.nanoTime()-t2);

Adapting Neal's example for JDK 1.4:
    private static final String[] strArray = new String[0];
    private static void withToArray() {
        List ss = new ArrayList();
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
        long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            String[] ssArray = (String[]) ss.toArray(strArray);
            for (int j=0; j < ssArray.length; j++) {
                String s = ssArray[j];
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-t1);
    private static final String[] strArray100 = new String[100];
    private static void withToArrayAndCheatingOnLength() {
        List ss = new ArrayList();
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
        long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            String[] ssArray = (String[]) ss.toArray(strArray100);
            for (int j=0; j < ssArray.length; j++) {
                String s = ssArray[j];
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-t1);
    private static void withToArrayAndCheatingOnLengthLocalVar() {
        List ss = new ArrayList();
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
        final String[] localStrArray100 = new String[100];
        long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            String[] ssArray = (String[]) ss.toArray(localStrArray100);
            for (int j=0; j < ssArray.length; j++) {
                String s = ssArray[j];
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-t1);
    } Allocating the string[] every time: 5812
Allocating the correctly sized string[] once, as a private final static: 2953
Allocating the correctly sized string[] once, as a final local var: 3141
Interesting that the private final static is 90ms faster than the local variable, fairly consistently.
What's interesting about that though, is that we're not iterating strArray100, we're iterating over ssArray, so its not clear why it should make a difference. If I modify things a little more:
    private static void withToArrayAndLoopOptimization() {
        List ss = new ArrayList();
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
        long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            String[] ssArray = (String[]) ss.toArray(strArray100);
            final int length = ssArray.length;
            for (int j=0; j < length; j++) {
                String s = ssArray[j];
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-t1);
    private static void withToArrayAndLoopOptimizationLocalVar() {
        List ss = new ArrayList();
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
        final String[] localStrArray100 = new String[100];
        long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            String[] ssArray = (String[]) ss.toArray(localStrArray100);
            final int length = ssArray.length;
            for (int j=0; j < length; j++) {
                String s = ssArray[j];
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-t1);
    } With private static final and loop optimization: 2937
With local variable and loop optimization: 2922
Now the different has disappeared: in fact, the numbers are exactly the same on many runs. You have to make 'length' final to get the best speed.
I guess I'm disappointed that in 2004, Java 1.4 javac & Hotspot combined still cannot spot the simplest loop optimization in the book.... always assuming that's actually causing the preformance difference. My gut is telling me its something else causing the difference because all of the inner loops are iterating over ssArray, not strArray100 (wherever that happends to be declared).
Someone care to run Neal's example on 1.5 and see if they've managed to optimize further under the covers?

Java AWT/Swing coexisting with native Qt application

Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how to get a GUI application written in Java to work in a native Qt application by embedding the Java application in the Qt application.
Any suggestions on how to do this...

It requires creating a system window (possibly frameless) using a native API calls (e.g. WinAPI or Xlib). That window might be embedded in your application. You would have to send system messages to that window (WM_XXXXX on Windows and XEvent's on X).
For more information I suggest you to look at KDE sources where it is implemented for X Window (there is also a Java package, kjas which is a server for running applets in Konqueror.
Or if you have much time you could write AWT on top of Qt (there is one built with Gtk+) and give the JVM your classes instead of the original JDK.
The choice is yours. Happy Qt-ing!

HT201335 Will the audio mirrors along with the video ?

I was searching all over to figure out more on screen mirroring feature via Apple TV . Everywhere it talks about screen mirroring , does it mean that only video what is appearing on the iPhone 4s screen is mirrored ? How do I get the audio to the HD TV ?

iPhone 4S mirroring sends both video and audio to the TV provided airplay of the content is supported.
With non-mirroring Airplay certain things only send teh audio as teh content owners block video airplay, but I've never heard of anyone getting video not audio, only the reverse.
AC

Feature request: support the SIP protocol

Hello. I noticed the other day that google voice is compatible with "SIP" friendly adapters, like obihai style ones, but skype is not by default. Could I make a friendly request that Skype add SIP functionality so that I can use more devices with it?
Thank you.
-roger-

Skype has supported the SIP protocol for quite some time now. It is however not part of their normal service. If you want to use the SIP version of Skype you will have to pay a premium. The service is called Skype Connect. http://www.skype.com/en/features/skype-connect/

How to do pagination with oracle along with java

hi
i want to know how to use pagination codes along with java.

Are you sure that you're on the right forum? This is the forum for Berkeley DB, Java Edition, and we don't support SQL.
Linda

Any idea when we will get support for Java 7.5 in Safari?

I'm in school for a degree in software engineering and Java is a big part of it. As a regular Mac user who uses Safari as his main browser, it's disappointing that adoption of the latest Java versions in Safari seem to be lacking. Is there any way to get Safari to look at the latest versions of Java instead of being stuck on Java 1.6?
Thanks in advance for any help! :-)

Apple has kept up to date (more recently) with the latest releases of Java 6 (1.6.0_33), which is the current public release of Java. You can install the development Java 7 runtime from Oracle (currently on build 5), but this will not support many features and functions of the final release. All future updates to Java will be issued and maintained by Oracle as it's done on other platforms. Apple will not be offering an in-house Java runtime after Java SE 6. You can get the latest Java updates here: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html

When I install OS 10.6 will iMovie 6 still be compatible along with the 3rd party plug ins?

When I install OS 10.6 -Snow Leopard-will iMovie 6 still be compatible along with the 3rd party plug ins?
Also, Firefox says Apple no longer supports OS 10.5 as far as security goes. Now what do I do?
I like to use both Safari and firefox.

iMovie 6 works just fine, even in 10.8. The plug-ins may not work in 10.7 and 10.8 as most use PPC code.

I am having problems when i have minimized windows and try to open a new window it will open all minimized windows along with the new window. It just changed when mozzilla updated. It did not do this before the update.

I am having problems when i have minimized windows and try to open a new window it will open all minimized windows along with the new window. It just changed when mozzilla updated. It did not do this before the update. Before the update if i had minimized windows they would stay minimized when i opened a new window. Please help ,I would guess it is just a setting somewhere but i cannot figure out where the setting is. Thanks jason

This issue can be caused by the ASK.com Toolbar.
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

Will java support swings along with sip protocol

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for