Windows Explorer copy wrongly offers to merge folders

When copying a folder tree to an empty(!) location using Windows Explorer it often complains about folders already existing in the target location and offers a merge.
This is reproducible on all my machines:
Using Windows Explorer
select c:\windows
copy to an empty directory
Windows shows a dialog "Confirm Folder Replace", offering to merge Windows folder with different create date
I posted about this problem a long time ago, but did not get an explanation.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7itprogeneral/thread/f44f2402-809f-4a53-a009-df58463a0cac/#49661e88-1eed-43a0-9e74-dedcb07bfc0f

We have just experienced a similar problem for the first time and think we can at least partially explain it.  We are copying the "My Pictures" folder from our c: drive to an external disc drive, where we then rename it with the date appended. 
But when we tried to copy it again a month later, we got the erroneous merge dialog box, just like everyone else.  We tried renaming the old folder (with the date appended) to something completely different, but it didn't make any difference -- we
still got the merge message that said our two different folders had the same name.   Huh?!
We think the problem is related to this:  we saw in one of our Windows 7 books that "My Documents" is just a localized "display" name for the ACTUAL file system name
for that directory, which is just "Documents".  (The connection is made through some hidden Desktop.ini file that points to a system file named Shell32.dll ... don't go there!)
Anyway, this is a "feature" allows us to DISPLAY the name of the "Documents" folder as anything we want, in any language we want, without actually changing the name of the "Documents"
directory in the file system itself.  You can verify this by bringing up an old "DOS" command prompt window and using the DIR command to view the actual directory names in your user profile:  the actual file system directory name is still "Documents",
no matter what you (or Microsoft) has renamed it to be displayed as (in our case, "My Documents").
To our sorrow, we discovered that this property is "inherited" when we copied the "My Documents" to an external drive for backup and then renamed it with a date suffix, ie, "My Documents 2011-03-05".  As it
turns out, we were only renaming the folder
display name.  If we again use a command prompt to look at the directory structure on the
external drive, the actual file system directory name on the backup drive is still "Documents" (!!!!!).
Now, when you try to do a copy/paste of one of these folders, Windows 7 appears to be slightly schizo.  We think it looks at the
actual file system directory names when doing the paste, so (in our case) it sees a sub-directory already named "Documents" in the target folder and decides it's time to put up the folder merger
dialog. 
But when it generates the (erroneous) folder merger dialog window, is uses the local display names for those two folders (which are different).  So you end up with a ridiculous looking message
which, in effect, says "Your target already has a folder named "ABC" so do you want me to merge folder "DEF" into it?"  But at the file system level, it thinks you're trying to copy a directory named "Documents" into a parent folder that already
has a sub-directory with that same name.
We can even "catch" Windows 7 erroneously using the actual file system directory name if we click-hold-drag (in order to move) our renamed "My Documents 2011-03-05" folder from one folder to another folder on the external drive. 
The move operation works fine, BUT after the move, the name of the "My Documents 2011-03-05" folder has been altered to display as, you guessed it, simply "Documents". 
Yikes!!! Since when does a simple click-hold-drag to move a folder also RENAME that folder?
So far, we've only caught this happening on directories/folder-names that ship with the OS itself, such as "Documents"/"My Documents", "Pictures"/"My Pictures", etc.  It did
not happen with a "Windows Live Mail" directory that we are also periodically copying to our external drive, presumably because Windows Live Mail 2011 was installed separately from the OS.
Well, we don't think we can fight this bug, so we're switching to a new strategy for our backups.  We now create a new folder on the external drive with the backup date in it, ie "2011-03-05" and then copy the "My Documents",
"My Pictures" , etc. etc. folders to that new "dated" backup folder.  This avoids duplicate subdirectory names going into the same folder, and lets the OS call the copied folder name a-n-y-t-h-i-n-g it wants to!  Plus
we don't have to append the date to the copied backup folder names any more.  As an added bonus, when we see that the "2011-03-05" backup folder is so old that we don't need to keep it anymore, we can just delete that folder and all of its subfolders
and files, and that backup is history.   

Similar Messages

  • Acrobat icon in Windows Explorer is wrong

    Hi,
    I've got Adobe Acrobat 7 installed, but for some reason the Acrobat icon does not appear in Windows explorer. What appears is the 'unrecognized' program icon. PDF files still open with Acrobat, but I've noticed I cannot use Windows search to search for text strings in the PDF files. I tried reinstalling, installing Acrobat Reader, changing to other program icons and changing back, increasing the icon cache size, but I still have the same problem. I even downloaded and installed a trial version of Acrobat 9, but the problem persists.
    Thanks in advance for any help.
    -=j

    You are talking about 2 different things. Sometimes the icons seem to change - apparently a MS OS problem. Anyway, you can fix the icon from Windwos Explere to going to the TOOLS>Folder Options>file types menu and selecting a new ICON for PDF files.
    As for the text search, I think you are talking about the limited search that is the default with MS Win XP and later. There is a flag in the registry you can change to fix this so that XP will search ALL files, not just the ones in their favorite list (i.e. - OFFICE files). I ran into this a year ago after looking for a file I new existed but not being able to find it for almost a year (sometimes I am bad about filing some files). I found the flag and within 2 minutes found the file. You may still have some problems with a PDF since it is a binary file and the information should be able to be seen directly by the OS. You will have to do a search for the flag as I do not remember it.

  • Windows Explorer not showing all folders in mapped dfs drive

    I have a strange problem, a users does not see all of the folders in a mapped dfs drive. The drive has over 2000 folders but in explorer it only shows 400. If I open a command prompt I can cd to the drive and dir lists all folders. the explorer behavior
    is also the same if I browse to the folder via UNC path.
    Thanks

    Hi jerry.v,
    What is your current situation?
    When the client connects to DFS share and Access-Based Enumeration is enabled on these share folders at the same time, then Windows Explorer will not display files or
    folders that a user does not have right to access.
    The other concern is is the permission settings and the Hidden files and folder.
    More information, please check the blog shared by Jay.ke:
    Why can’t I see all files in a Shared folder?
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2008/10/07/why-can-t-i-see-all-files-in-a-shared-folder.aspx
    Best regards
    Michael Shao
    TechNet Community Support

  • HT201302 pictures not showing in windows explorer on my windows 7 computer, but they do show on another computer with vista

    My PC has windows 7 64-bit.  I can see my iphone in windows explorer, but I cannot see any folders underneath.  When I plug my iphone into a windows vista pc, I can see the iphone and the folders with pictures.  Does anyone else using windows 7 have this problem?

    Works perfectly fine for me on Windows 7, Vista, or XP.
    Are these pictures taken with the device?

  • Windows Explorer always opens folders in a new window

    Yes, yes, I've googled it already.  And bing-ed it just for fun too.
    This doesn't work:
    http://windowsxp.mvps.org/samewindow.htm
    Nor does this:
    http://blog.hansmelis.be/2009/05/17/windows-vista-explorer-opens-folders-in-a-new-window/
    Yes, yes, I've checked the Open in same folder option in folder options.
    I've used shellex to disable context menu items.
    I've rebooted a hundred times.
    This is rediculous.  Windows should only recognize ONE setting for this and that is the one in folder options.  Anything else that affects it is a BUG!
    I'm on build 7100 RC.
    And I'm quite frustrated with this.
    Please help!
    Jared

    <<...tried to import the key from that known-good windows installation ...... (but
    was 64bits)...>>
    importing x64 keys to an x86 installation may not work.  HKLM\WOW6432Node\Classes\Interface would have to be combined with (overwrite)
    the standard location and then that be copied/imported to the x86 install.  Even then, there might be some unanticipated problems. 
    It's good that you had a registry backup available in system restore.  Although I like the inherent security and reliability in the Vista/Win7 system restore implementations, one thing that I miss was being able to pluck only the registry files from
    a restore point; like I used to do with WinXP.
    <<...Yes, my case is precisely (Windows Explorer always opens folders in a new window) on
    Win7. ....>>
    Also, that is too general.  There is more nitty-gritty details that have to be verified, such as whether the issue is per-user,
    or whether the "Explore" option is in bold and works properly when manually selected.  In a lot of cases, that simply may not be in bold which means it's no longer the default action on double-click.  (requires different set of steps to resolve,
    focusing on another part of the registry)  But from what you've stated on JAVA update 20, there well could be some changes to the HKLM portion of that Interface key... don't know.  A before and after registry compare usually helps pin down the issue.
    EDIT 10y04m24d_130735:
     One other thing that occurs to me, is that the dreaded Yahoo toolbar often installs with Sun Microsystems's JAVA.  I've removed such toolbars on many browsers because they render IE8 unstable/unreliable with occasional to routine freezes/crashes.

  • Copy and paste files from Windows Explorer

    Hi everybody,
    For a part of my application I need to copy and paste files and folders from Windows explorer to the vi shown in the picture.
    Does anybody know how to implement this with the clipboard functionality.
    Also drag and drop would be very nice (but thats maybe a later step...)
    Best regards, Helmut

    Hello Friedr,
    drag and drop is the easy part!
    Use a path control, this will naturally allow drag and drop. If a file is dropped on this a 'Value Change' event is fired! with this event you can load the data into the picture. To get a nice drag and drop functionality you should make the path transparent and resize to the size of the picture control. This will work fluently!
    To use the clipboard, LV 8 has an functionality for this, I think it is an application event.
    Success Ton
    PS I didn't see you image maybe it was removed when you did a preview these have the bad habit of removing the attachments!
    Free Code Capture Tool! Version 2.1.3 with comments, web-upload, back-save and snippets!
    Nederlandse LabVIEW user groep www.lvug.nl
    My LabVIEW Ideas
    LabVIEW, programming like it should be!

  • I accidentally cut instead of copied a folder of previously imported raw files. When I pasted the folder back I could see it in Windows Explore but not in the LR library. How can I work with these files again?

    HI,
    My daughter will often ask me to give her raw files I've taken at family events so that she can process them in her own copy of LR. (I work too slowly, apparently.) Recently I inadvertently cut instead of copied a folder. When I pasted it back I could see it in Windows Explorer but not in my LR library. I thought that re-importing the files might work, LR gave me a message that they were already imported. I expect there is a way to make the files available again in LR and would be grateful for some advice.
    thanks
    Ken

    The solutions is either of the following:
    Adobe Lightroom - Find moved or missing files and folders
    Copy the photos back into the exact same folder and folder location that they were in before
    I don't know what you actually did "when I pasted it back" ... but the bigger issue is that you shouldn't be working with these files in your operating system, period. Once you import them into Lightroom, you don't manage these files in your operating system.

  • HHActiveX.dll  - Windows Explorer open folders in separate window (Win7/ Vista)

    Windows Explorer will open folders in a separate window when you double click them.
    Adobe RoboHelp HTML 8 with update 1 and 2 installed sequentially on Windows XP.
    HHActiveX.dll  8.0.0.203 registered by installer
    Problem:
    What we're seeing is, after installing HHActiveX.dll with our product suite on a 32-bit Windows 7 system (and probably Vista also), after rebooting the computer, Windows Explorer will open folders in a separate window when you double click them. This occurs even when Windows Explorer is set to open them in the same window.
    Solution:
    This seems to have something to do with the registration of actxprxy.dll and/or ieproxy.dll. Reregistering these DLLs and rebooting usually fixes this problem.
    This web article mentions side effects in Internet Explorer and a couple of other programs that also come from this.
    Here's a web page that outlines what we're seeing and how to fix it manually:
    http://www.davidmoore.info/2009/08/19/solution-explorer-open-each-folder-in-same-window-er ror-and-sql-management-studio-ie-and-team-explorer-errors/
    In Windows 7 (and probably Vista also), the GUID of this library has changed from {B8DA6310-E19B-11D0-933C-00A0C90DCAA9} to {C90250F3-4D7D-4991-9B69-A5C5BC1C2AE6}. Also, the registry entries that are concerned with actxprxy.dll are under HKCR\CLSID\{B8DA6310-E19B-11D0-933C-00A0C90DCAA9}; the last component in that registry path is the old GUID, and that's probably what is causing the problem.
    Questions:
    The previous approach provides a way to fix the problem by adding some code to reregister the two DLLs at the end of the install. The developer would prefer not to have to add install code to fix this problem in the first place.
    1) Is this a known issue with Adobe HHActiveX.dll and Windows 7 / Vista? (I didn't find much with a web search or in Adobe Forums.)
    2) Is a newer HHActiveX.dll available to fix this issue?
    3) Does Adobe have a fix for the Windows Explorer problem that this DLL is causing in Windows 7 (and probably Vista also).
    4) Any suggestions?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Here is what the developer did to fix the issue.
    MSI Install: The installer is unregistering actxprxy.dll and ieproxy.dll on Windows 7 32-bit PCs
    Problem: The problem was being caused by Adobe's HHActiveX.dll, a DLL that we have to install because of the browse sequences/ glossary in the new application help. This DLL was registering itself against actxprxy.dll using the GUID that was in use prior to Vista; and that in turn caused the Windows Explorer problem, among others.
    Fix: Added a custom action that is called after the application is installed (or reinstalled or upgraded) that reregisters the 32-bit actxprxy.dll and ieproxy.dll. (Since the problem doesn't manifest itself on 64-bit systems, the custom action leaves the 64-bit actxprxy.dll and ieproxy.dll as they are.) Rolled back the registry deletions that were done in the Shared - help third party merge module in the previous attempt to fix this bug, as those changes were found to be unnecessary.
    Cheers

  • Finder and Windows Explorer Functionality to be 'Merged'

    Right, before I start what I expect will be an epic battle, this is not what I intend this thread to entail...
    I have recently moved from being a purely windows user (Software Developer), to using OS X as well. My girlfriends study dictated that I recommended her buying a Mac. Consequently, her inexperience dictated that I should learn OS X in order to be her technical support. Everything until earlier this week was great, but I'm still a lover of the OS.
    The aforementioned 'until earlier this week' has caused one major usability gripe with which I have now read up on exstensively; the way that finder handles copying folders.
    Now to a certain extent I see why it was slightly naieve of me to think that copying a folder should ONLY replace the files within and not the whole folder, but thats because I have grown up basically Windows only.
    So I copied the folder structure (containing organised subfolders) of ALL of my girlfriends university work to date across to the Mac and misinterpreted what the copy would do, it turns out that this replaces the whole folder, and does not move the original folder to trash.
    AND NOW TO THE POINT OF THIS THREAD...
    As I began, I do not intend this thread to be a Windows vs Mac rantfest. I would merely like to rally up who can see the benefits of merging the way that OS X replaces the whole folder with the Windows options to only replace files within (merge).
    This would then allow the possibility of easily copying folders with nested sub-folders (a la windows), but also allow the original method of replacing the destined folder (keeping with the mac tradition).
    I don't want to go down the route of 'but every other OS merges folders' because this isn't every other OS, its OS X, and it seems that everything else that they have done, they've done well!
    If the proposed could be implemented, not only would it allow more options for existing Mac users, but also allow a smoother crossover for users from other OS's
    Perhaps something like below could work.
    'The folder <folder name> already exists, do you wish to replace this folder, or merge its contents with the current folder?'
    || Replace || || Merge || || Cancel ||
    As I am no expert of usability, the wording above should probably be changed.
    Given enough interest (and perhaps a little understanding from long term mac users ;o) ) I wish to inform Apple of this thread so we will all get the best of both worlds (and I won't have a nagging girlfriend with much lost work).
    I look forward to your interest/comments (but please keep it nice).
    Robsta
    Message was edited by: Robsta83

    A slightly different angle of approach here can be viewed by how I think Superduper operates. Superduper has a really smart update function in its cloning. It will when updating the clone look for files on a bit by bit basis and see if there are changes to any specific file. If it sees changes, it will ensure that the files that are changed on the original get updated on the clone. It will ensure the files that are deleted on the original get deleted on the clone, and it will ensure that the files that are added on the original get added to the clone when the update is performed.
    Now here in is the problem. Some users actually want OLDER versions to be preserved on their backup but not the original when they copy to the archived backup. We've seen here people are complaining that their archived backup is not preserved by Time Machine:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6107525#6107525
    So the problem we are faced with here, is there are different needs for different people when copying files. While some are happy just to maintain a current copy of their files, others wish to manage archives when copying files. So a merge function would have to include the caveat of what does not get preserved when the merge happens. In the face of trying to be simple, you can't be all things for all people. As a freelance technician not working for Apple, I can just say, it probably is best for the user to see how an effort has been made to simplify the process, and work around it if necessary to achieve your needs.
    I've used Windows 2000 and XP Pro and know it asks me whether or not to replace each file that is identical each time I copy from one folder to another when the names are the same. This is a laborious process, saying OK, cancel, ok, cancel if it is done indefinitely. I can see the dialog box asking:
    "Do you want to replace all older files, some older files, with newer files of the same name, or do you want to replace newer files with some older files of the same name?"
    A new computer user would go "Huh???"
    Merge is nice for those of us who can keep track of it in real life.
    For the rest of us who are organizationally challenged, or time challenged, we just want it done right the first time. Unfortunately neither Apple, nor the computer can read everyone's mind.
    I agree a merge function would be nice, but I think it would overly complicate matters.

  • How can I display the folders in an ftp site in Windows Explorer during a Firefox web browsing session?

    I would like to view and select multiple files from a folder on an ftp site and copy them to a folder on my computer, but with Firefox it seems I have to plod through one file at a time. In IE there is a Page button which has an option to display the site in Windows Explorer, which allows me to select and copy as many files as I want at one time.
    Does such a feature exist in Firefox, or an approximation?
    Thank you

    That is done via an onbeforeunload or onunload event that displays a JavaScript alert.
    *https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.onbeforeunload
    *https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.onunload
    You can try to search for a Greasemonkey script to reset and block such events.
    *http://www.greasespot.net/ - Greasemonkey
    *http://wiki.greasespot.net/Main_Page - GreaseSpot

  • How can I get my files back in their proper folders in Windows Explorer?

    For over 10 years I have meticulously put my photos in folders according to month, event.  So a folder is in directory labeled 2013, with
    I've successfully used Adobe Bridge to browse, edit, final edit in Photoshop.
    Now I use Lightroom and everything is put into a Lightroom Catalog with weird numbers on the folders and all my pictures have vanished from my carefully created folders on Windows Explorer?
    How do I put the pictures back to where they were - short of going to my backup files.
    Also since using Lightroom, Photoshop is hanging saying it is waiting for Network I/O threads - so I cannot save (on my own disk - why Photoshop CC should look at the network for every task beats me - I had about 5 threads waiting on the network).
    All I'm trying to do is find my best 12 pictures from 2013 to make a Christmas letter and I've already spent a whole evening trying to get this to work.
    Is this how Lightroom works, or is it a terrible bug, or is there an option to not move the original files when making a Lightroom catalog?
    I am a single user, so don't need sharing, network, workflow.
    I only want Lightroom to Point to my files, not to move them.  Maybe I should go back to Bridge?

    I discovered a wonderful blog that explained:
    Lightroom is a database and it holds the pictures
    Bridge is a browser that browses files on the disk
    I'm getting used to Lightroom, even though I have many pictures because I organize them and only look at recent ones, it does seem that Bridge is better for me - so I am not locked into Adobe's database.
    All is clear now - except Photoshop is hanging a bit - maybe graphics driver or memory problem. Sometimes it works, sometimes it seems to time out.

  • One of the folders of Robo Help Project Manager is listed twice in Windows Explorer.

    Hello Everybody,
    One of the folders of Robo Help Project Manager is listed twice in Windows Explorer. One has all the subfolders and topics of it and the other has all the subfolders but not the topics. How did I get into this kind of situation? Why do I have two folders? Can somebody please answer on this?
    Since my RH project is attached to Visual Source Safe (VSS), the same structure is mirroring in VSS.

    Hi there
    After reviewing the image I see that what you might think are two of the same folder are two different folders similar in name.
    One is named Advanced_Functionality. The other is named Advanced_Funtionality (note the missing C).
    I'm assuming this is the folder you are referring to?
    Cheers... Rick
    Click here for Adobe Authorized Captivate and RoboHelp HTML Training
    Click here for the SorcerStone Blog
    Click here for RoboHelp and Captivate eBooks

  • Windows Explorer Refuses to Open Folders In Same Window

    I have Windows Vista Ultimate SP1. Under Organize->Folder and Search Options->Browse folders I have the radio button, "Open each folder in the same window" checked. However, Vista refuses to do so and opens each folder in its own window. This does not work well for me because I end up with tons of open windows and its a pain to close them. This behaviour just started. Yesterday it did not do this. This is a fresh install with only Visual Studio 2005, Visual Studio 2008, SQL Server 2005, Expression Studio 2, Adobe CS3 and InstallAware installed.
    Also worth noting is that if I right click on a folder, the default action of Open is in bold. If I click it then it will open the folder in the same window. However, every time I double click it opens a new window.
    Please help as I really don't want to have to switch to a third party file management tool over this.
    Thanks!

    Guys,
    This problem has been driving me nuts for weeks now. I've cruised this and several other forums, and tried every damn "fix" out there.
    WINDOWS 7 HOME PREMIUM (All updates applied)
    I've done registry edits, registered .dll files, changed folder option settings back and forth, uninstalled software, re-installed software,  etc, etc.. Ad nauseam. (I
    don't have IE8 or Source Gear Vault) Although both of these seem to come up often in these discussions. 
    I bumbled into something on one these forums, and    ** I FOUND THE SOLUTION!**
    It is very easy to do
    Presumably SAFE (It comes from Microsoft) 
    I suggest you bookmark this site for future use. (I did, and plan on using it for some of my clients computers
    when having weird problems)
    Go to this web site: http://support.microsoft.com/fixit/
    Then, in section 2 click on "Use desktop features, or open programs and files"
    In the window below will be a list of solutions. Simply "Run Now" the one called : Diagnose and repair Windows File and Folder Problems automatically 
    After running the "fixit" my problem of a new window opening all the time in Windows Explorer went away! Worked perfect!
    Ps.  In my Browser rather than running when I clicked "Run",  it downloaded the file. So I ran it locally. No big deal, they suggest doing that anyway if you need the file to run on a computer that is not online. When I ran the program I chose
    the second option, which is to NOT fix the problem automatically, but to see a list of repair options first. (rather than choosing to repair automatically)
    My results were two things:
    Rebuild my icon cache (didn't really have troubles with that anyway)
    Repair folder options
    I decided to let it "fix" both problems, even though I haven't had any problems with icons. After the program finished (about 20 sec) I checked and no longer had the problem of a new window opening in explorer, however the acid test was going to be will
    it continue to work properly after I re-boot. Guess what? PROBLEM WAS FINALLY SOLVED!
    Anyway, I hope this works for any of you guys too. I see that "some" of these other solutions worked for some of you, but none of them worked for me until I ran the "FIXIT" program from Microsoft. There is also a
    ton of other AUTOMATIC FIXIT's on the site for various other computer problems. I hope they all work as well as this one did! (I'll try to post this in some of the other forums, but feel free to do so yourself)
    Good luck everyone.....
    Mark

  • Build a tool for controlling a copy file operation base on its file size in any folder of Window Explorer

    Hi all,
    We are developing a tool which will control a copy file operation in any folder of Window Explorer base on file size limit.
    If these copied files are not satisfied the file size condition (its size is larger than a predefined value), the copy/move operation must not be executed.
    My question is that: "Are there any availability support of Windows API/tool for implementing this feature?"
    BR,
    Mr_Le

    Hi Mr_Le,
    Thank you for posting in the MSDN forum.
    Based on your description, I’m afraid that it is not the correct forum for this issue, since this forum is to discuss:
    Visual Studio WPF/SL Designer, Visual Studio Guidance Automation Toolkit, Developer Documentation and Help System, and Visual Studio Editor.
    To help you find the correct development forum for this issue, please tell me the real project type (Winforms or others) and the real development language (C#, VB or others) you want to use.
    If you are not very sure that which kind of project fulfils this requirement, maybe the language development forum would be better for this issue:
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/home?category=vslanguages&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc
    If there's any concern, please feel free to let me know.
    Best Regards,
    Jack
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • How can I get iTUNES library to display renamed files and folders (renamed with Windows Explorer)?

    How can I get iTunes library to display the new names and organisation of tracks and albums (ie files and folders) that I have renamed and reorganised (using Windows Explorer) having previously imported them using iTunes?
    (Even when I relocate "lost" tracks in iTunes (using the drop down menu facility to view in Windows explorer), although iTunes will then play the track, and knows where to find it, it refuses to display the track with its correct (new) name, or show it the correct (new) album.  That means I have lots of things called "Untitled" and "Track 01" etc, all of which have actually been renamed, but iTunes does not seem to have the capability to recognise the changes and update its library listing.  Another example - a Tchaikovsky CD with 3 major works in 13 tracks insists on displaying in iTunes as 13 tracks in one album, despite the fact that I have reorganised the tracks into 3 albums - two being Swan Lake and The Nutcracker - and renamed the individual tracks to a more useable format.)

    Thanks for your replies ckuan
    I agree with Tgod that your first solution does not work.  It appears unpredictable whether the old or new file names are listed when you drag the folders into iTunes from Windows Explorer.  The folder structure is completely missing.  I reckon if you have to muck around spending days/weeks/months finding out how to fix links to a secret meta-file (obviously designed by some deep-cover microsoft worm working in the Apple!), then it's pretty obvious that almost any alternate way of doing this would be better.   Bye bye iTunes!!
    Incidentally, I tried several other things that (if the software was designed intuitively) should work, but give disastrous results:
    1) when deleting the library listing in iTunes, it gives you two options - one is to remove the listings to the Recycler.  Be aware that IF you select that option, it removes not only your library listing, but also your ACTUAL MUSIC FILES to the Recycler.  Moreover, it does NOT remove the insidious secret meta-file that is what apparently keeps rewriting old names over your carefully renamed file names, and keeps totally ignoring your carefully designed folder (album) structure.  OK - not a complete disaster, as I realised and went hunting through the chaos in the Recycler to recover all my files.  No thanks to the genius who designed this brilliant feature!
    2) after deleting the library listing in iTunes, I attempted to import just the folders that I wanted.  iTunes refused to allow me to do that, and proceeded to try to import every frigging music file it could find on my whole hard drive, in apparently random fashion into the library.  Whoever thought up that doozy either never ever tried to use or market test it, or has modified their mind rather too many times with artificial substances so their brain is like muesli chop suey.
    3) oh why go on, it's too depressing ...

Maybe you are looking for