Windows Explorer Displays Redirected Folders as a Different Name

Hi Guys,
Windows 2008 and Windows 2008 R2 has this new feature where it displays folders in which you have ownership of as "Documents" or "Start Menu" for Folder Redirection.
This only renames it when browsing it through Windows Explorer (explorer.exe).  If you browse the folders through a command prompt using DIR, it will display the correct name... %username%.
I think Microsoft did this to make it more user friendly, but HOW DO I TURN IT OFF its annoying!
I wrote this program in visual basic that takes ownership of a folder, Grants Administrators, SYSTEM and %username% full control.  It grabs %username% from the folder name as ususally with redirection the folder in which the data is redirected to =
%username%.  After setting the permissions correctly the program then gives ownership BACK to the user.
Anyway upon running my little application... look what explorer did.  I had Ownership of the folder for a split second before the application gave ownership back.  Because of this when I opened up the folder Explorer populated many of the
folders as "Application Data" when they should be displayed as %username%.
Even though the user now has ownership of the folders now, it still displays them as Application Data!  If I log into the file server as another user account, it displays them correctly.  Explorer is caching this meta data under the users
profile somewhere.
There is NO information on this on the internet.  Can someone at Microsoft give me some information to turn this functionality of explorer.exe off or tell me where this meta data is stored so I can blow it away without having to re-create the entire
profile?
Clint Boessen MCSE, MCITP: Messaging
Perth, Western Australia
Blog: http://clintboessen.blogspot.com/

All,
We have numerous customers running W2K8 SP & R2 environments, none of which have reported this issue. Oddly enough though we have recently provisioned a W2K8 R2 remote desktop
host farm for a custom who has a w2k3 R2 environment.
We performed all the pre requisites to host the farm in the W2K3 R2 domain, and added the GPO structure to one of the W2K8 R2 servers as you cannot make remote desktop GPO’s
with W2K3 R2 GPO’s.
User do not have profile or home directory paths defined in AD
Profile and home folder paths are defined in the GPO
Folder redirection is enabled for Documents and Application Data
BEHAVIOR:
To start with when users logged onto the RD Farm they had their home folder path correctly set and the folder names in the root of the share was correct.
\\server\share\username1\ect
Then after 3 months we noticed that users home folder path was no longer being created with the %username% structure and looked like this
\\server\share\my documents\ect
The profile and application data folder redirection is working 
as expected by creating a folder with the username.
The document folder redirection is not working correctly.
CONFIGURATION:
Set path for Remote Desktop Services Roaming User Profile
Enabled
Profile path
\\SERVER\profileshare\
Specify the path in the form,
\\Computername\Sharename
Set Remote Desktop Services User Home Directory
Enabled
Location:
On the Network
Home Dir Root Path:
\\SERVER\homeshare\
If home path is on the network, specify drive letter for the mapped drive.
Drive Letter
U:
Current GPO Settings:
AppData(Roaming)hide
Setting: Basic (Redirect everyone's folder to the same location)hide
Path:
\\SERVER\SHARE1\%USERNAME%\AppData\Roaming
Documentshide
Setting: Basic (Redirect everyone's folder to the same location)hide
Path: %HOMESHARE%%HOMEPATH%
ISSUE:
When enumerating via windows explorer on the Windows 2003 R2 or Windows 2008 R2 servers you see some document folders with
the correct %username% name, but mostly they are all enumerating as My Documents.
If you open a command prompt on the W2K3 R2 server and perform a DIR you will see a list of %username% folders correctly.
CONCLUTION:
I am going to dig deeper into file/folder level attribute flags set by default when creating folders by windows 2008, as I feel there is a problem with windows 2008 Server creating
data in a windows 2003 R2 server ntfs folder structure. I am aware NTFS has been upgraded and the version used in 2003 is not the same as 2008 and above.
If I find a solution I will update this ticket

Similar Messages

  • Windows Explorer always opens folders in a new window

    Yes, yes, I've googled it already.  And bing-ed it just for fun too.
    This doesn't work:
    http://windowsxp.mvps.org/samewindow.htm
    Nor does this:
    http://blog.hansmelis.be/2009/05/17/windows-vista-explorer-opens-folders-in-a-new-window/
    Yes, yes, I've checked the Open in same folder option in folder options.
    I've used shellex to disable context menu items.
    I've rebooted a hundred times.
    This is rediculous.  Windows should only recognize ONE setting for this and that is the one in folder options.  Anything else that affects it is a BUG!
    I'm on build 7100 RC.
    And I'm quite frustrated with this.
    Please help!
    Jared

    <<...tried to import the key from that known-good windows installation ...... (but
    was 64bits)...>>
    importing x64 keys to an x86 installation may not work.  HKLM\WOW6432Node\Classes\Interface would have to be combined with (overwrite)
    the standard location and then that be copied/imported to the x86 install.  Even then, there might be some unanticipated problems. 
    It's good that you had a registry backup available in system restore.  Although I like the inherent security and reliability in the Vista/Win7 system restore implementations, one thing that I miss was being able to pluck only the registry files from
    a restore point; like I used to do with WinXP.
    <<...Yes, my case is precisely (Windows Explorer always opens folders in a new window) on
    Win7. ....>>
    Also, that is too general.  There is more nitty-gritty details that have to be verified, such as whether the issue is per-user,
    or whether the "Explore" option is in bold and works properly when manually selected.  In a lot of cases, that simply may not be in bold which means it's no longer the default action on double-click.  (requires different set of steps to resolve,
    focusing on another part of the registry)  But from what you've stated on JAVA update 20, there well could be some changes to the HKLM portion of that Interface key... don't know.  A before and after registry compare usually helps pin down the issue.
    EDIT 10y04m24d_130735:
     One other thing that occurs to me, is that the dreaded Yahoo toolbar often installs with Sun Microsystems's JAVA.  I've removed such toolbars on many browsers because they render IE8 unstable/unreliable with occasional to routine freezes/crashes.

  • I'm in iPhone 5.  I transfer photos to a Windows 7 PC, using the USB cable.  Lately, the photos are appearing in Windows Explorer within monthly folders, with gibberish titles.  The folder names will be 8 random letters and numeric characters.  I ten

    I'm in iPhone 5.  I transfer photos to a Windows 7 PC, using the USB cable.  Lately, the photos are appearing in Windows Explorer within monthly folders, with gibberish titles.  The folder names will be 8 random letters and numeric characters.  I tend to let photos build up, so there are about 2 years worth of these monthly folders… Between 20 and 25.  This is a huge hassle… I'm unable to tell what months are in each folder, by the folder name.…  Have to open each folder to see which month is in there.  I want to be able to look at all the photos on the iPhone in one view, as I was able to in the past.  How do I stop this foldering of photos, by months??  Thank you.  BC

    I have the same issue. I searched and finally got only one answer is -- Apple suggest customer using iMAC to transfer and backup photos instead of Windows. How great the solution is it!

  • Why does my Windows Vista computer say the wrong iPod Touch name? I have multiple iPod Touches and after updating one of them, Windows Explorer says they are all the same name now.

    Sorry for the exceedingly long title...
    I have multiple iPod touches, and I just updated one of them to the newest iOS (5.0.1). Now whenever I plug in any of the others, the name of the one I updated appears in Windows explorer. How can I make Windows able to determine which iPod is which again?
    64 bit vista home premium.

    iPod Classic are high drain USB devices, I hope you are not trying to connnect them simultaneously to iTunes, which will definitely hang your USB Host controller, thereby freeze iTunes.
    But here is an Apple Support Article on using multiple iPods for iTunes.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1495?viewlocale=en_US
    Have nice day!

  • Photos in Windows Explorer folders marked as empty

    I am using Windows 7 64 bit.  My photos are readily available in the appropriate folders when I look at them within Lightroom, Browser or Photoshop.  But if I open Windows Explorer, those same folders are marked as "Empty."  This did not happen until I added Lightroom 3 and imported all of my photos.  They are not marked as hidden either under properties.  What happened?

    When importing, LR can add photos from their existing location or it can move the photos somewhere else.  Are you sure you're looking at the same place in both LR and Explorer? 
    A test would be to right-click on one of the photos in LR and choose Show in Explorer and see where it opens Explorer.

  • HHActiveX.dll  - Windows Explorer open folders in separate window (Win7/ Vista)

    Windows Explorer will open folders in a separate window when you double click them.
    Adobe RoboHelp HTML 8 with update 1 and 2 installed sequentially on Windows XP.
    HHActiveX.dll  8.0.0.203 registered by installer
    Problem:
    What we're seeing is, after installing HHActiveX.dll with our product suite on a 32-bit Windows 7 system (and probably Vista also), after rebooting the computer, Windows Explorer will open folders in a separate window when you double click them. This occurs even when Windows Explorer is set to open them in the same window.
    Solution:
    This seems to have something to do with the registration of actxprxy.dll and/or ieproxy.dll. Reregistering these DLLs and rebooting usually fixes this problem.
    This web article mentions side effects in Internet Explorer and a couple of other programs that also come from this.
    Here's a web page that outlines what we're seeing and how to fix it manually:
    http://www.davidmoore.info/2009/08/19/solution-explorer-open-each-folder-in-same-window-er ror-and-sql-management-studio-ie-and-team-explorer-errors/
    In Windows 7 (and probably Vista also), the GUID of this library has changed from {B8DA6310-E19B-11D0-933C-00A0C90DCAA9} to {C90250F3-4D7D-4991-9B69-A5C5BC1C2AE6}. Also, the registry entries that are concerned with actxprxy.dll are under HKCR\CLSID\{B8DA6310-E19B-11D0-933C-00A0C90DCAA9}; the last component in that registry path is the old GUID, and that's probably what is causing the problem.
    Questions:
    The previous approach provides a way to fix the problem by adding some code to reregister the two DLLs at the end of the install. The developer would prefer not to have to add install code to fix this problem in the first place.
    1) Is this a known issue with Adobe HHActiveX.dll and Windows 7 / Vista? (I didn't find much with a web search or in Adobe Forums.)
    2) Is a newer HHActiveX.dll available to fix this issue?
    3) Does Adobe have a fix for the Windows Explorer problem that this DLL is causing in Windows 7 (and probably Vista also).
    4) Any suggestions?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Here is what the developer did to fix the issue.
    MSI Install: The installer is unregistering actxprxy.dll and ieproxy.dll on Windows 7 32-bit PCs
    Problem: The problem was being caused by Adobe's HHActiveX.dll, a DLL that we have to install because of the browse sequences/ glossary in the new application help. This DLL was registering itself against actxprxy.dll using the GUID that was in use prior to Vista; and that in turn caused the Windows Explorer problem, among others.
    Fix: Added a custom action that is called after the application is installed (or reinstalled or upgraded) that reregisters the 32-bit actxprxy.dll and ieproxy.dll. (Since the problem doesn't manifest itself on 64-bit systems, the custom action leaves the 64-bit actxprxy.dll and ieproxy.dll as they are.) Rolled back the registry deletions that were done in the Shared - help third party merge module in the previous attempt to fix this bug, as those changes were found to be unnecessary.
    Cheers

  • Renaming libraries in Windows Explorer

    Hi there,
    I am trying to separate my business documents into separate libraries to manage my file limits a bit better.
    The site is called 'Condell Financial'.
    I have created several libraries within this site (e.g. 'accounting & tax', 'client files', 'staffing', etc). When I sync these libraries to windows explorer they show up with the file name 'Condell Financial - accounting & ta', 'Condell Financial
    - client files', etc.
    When I try to rename these libraries in explorer to make them shorter, it says "the action cannot be completed because the folder or a file in it is open in another program. Close the folder and try again."
    I have closed all of the files and folders on my PC but I still get this message.
    Its annoying because when the file names are too long, it just cuts off the end of them ('accounting & tax' is now 'accounting & ta').
    Is there a workaround for this?
    Any help would be much appreciated

    Once a Document Library is created, you cannot rename the DL hard coded  name which you access using explorer view. You can always delete and create a new DL.
    Moreover from Explorer view you can never create a DL, you can always create a folder. to create a DL you will have to use Designer or browser view.
    You can change the display name as below:
    https://reason.kzoo.edu/is/software/sharepoint/howto_rename/

  • Windows Explorer misreads large-file .zip archives

       I just spent about 90 minutes trying to report this problem through
    the normal support channels with no useful result, so, in desperation,
    I'm trying here, in the hope that someone can direct this report to some
    useful place.
       There appears to be a bug in the .zip archive reader used by Windows
    Explorer in Windows 7 (and up, most likely).
       An Info-ZIP Zip user recently reported a problem with an archive
    created using our Zip program.  The archive was valid, but it contained
    a file which was larger than 4GiB.  The complaint was that Windows
    Explorer displayed (and, apparently believed) an absurdly large size
    value for this large-file archive member.  We have since reproduced the
    problem.
       The original .zip archive format includes uncompressed and compressed
    sizes for archive members (files), and these sizes were stored in 32-bit
    fields.  This caused problems for files which are larger than 4GiB (or,
    on some system types, where signed size values were used, 2GiB).  The
    solution to this fundamental limitation was to extend the .zip archive
    format to allow storage of 64-bit member sizes, when necessary.  (PKWARE
    identifies this format extension as "Zip64".)
       The .zip archive format includes a mechanism, the "Extra Field", for
    storing various kinds of metadata which had no place in the normal
    archive file headers.  Examples include OS-specific file-attribute data,
    such as Finder info and extended attributes for Apple Macintosh; record
    format, record size, and record type data for VMS/OpenVMS; universal
    file times and/or UID/GID for UNIX(-like) systems; and so on.  The Extra
    Field is where the 64-bit member sizes are stored, when the fixed 32-bit
    size fields are too small.
       An Extra Field has a structure which allows multiple types of extra
    data to be included.  It comprises one or more "Extra Blocks", each of
    which has the following structure:
           Size (bytes) | Description
          --------------+------------
                2       | Type code
                2       | Number of data bytes to follow
            (variable)  | Extra block data
       The problem with the .zip archive reader used by Windows Explorer is
    that it appears to expect the Extra Block which includes the 64-bit
    member sizes (type code = 0x0001) to be the first (or only) Extra Block
    in the Extra Field.  If some other Extra Block appears at the start of
    the Extra Field, then its (non-size) data are being incorrectly
    interpreted as the 64-bit sizes, while the actual 64-bit size data,
    further along in the Extra Field, are ignored.
       Perhaps the .zip archive _writer_ used by Windows Explorer always
    places the Extra Block with the 64-bit sizes in this special location,
    but the .zip specification does not demand any particular order or
    placement of Extra Blocks in the Extra Field, and other programs
    (Info-ZIP Zip, for example) should not be expected to abide by this
    artificial restriction.  For details, see section "4.5 Extensible data
    fields" in the PKWARE APPNOTE:
          http://www.pkware.com/documents/casestudies/APPNOTE.TXT
       A .zip archive reader is expected to consider the Extra Block type
    codes, and interpret accordingly the data which follow.  In particular,
    it's not sufficient to trust that any particular Extra Block will be the
    first one in the Extra Field.  It's generally safe to ignore any Extra
    Block whose type code is not recognized, but it's crucial to scan the
    Extra Field, identify each Extra Block, and handle it according to its
    type.
       Here are some relatively small (about 14MiB each) test archives which
    illustrate the problem:
          http://antinode.info/ftp/info-zip/ms_zip64/test_4g.zip
          http://antinode.info/ftp/info-zip/ms_zip64/test_4g_V.zip
          http://antinode.info/ftp/info-zip/ms_zip64/test_4g_W.zip
       Correct info, from UnZip 6.00 ("unzip -lv"):
    Archive:  test_4g.zip
     Length   Method    Size  Cmpr    Date    Time   CRC-32   Name
    4362076160  Defl:X 14800839 100% 05-01-2014 15:33 6d8d2ece  test_4g.txt
    Archive:  test_4g_V.zip
     Length   Method    Size  Cmpr    Date    Time   CRC-32   Name
    4362076160  Defl:X 14800839 100% 05-01-2014 15:33 6d8d2ece  test_4g.txt
    Archive:  test_4g_W.zip
     Length   Method    Size  Cmpr    Date    Time   CRC-32   Name
    4362076160  Defl:X 14800839 100% 05-01-2014 15:33 6d8d2ece  test_4g.txt
    (In these reports, "Length" is the uncompressed size; "Size" is the
    compressed size.)
       Incorrect info, from (Windows 7) Windows Explorer:
    Archive        Name          Compressed size   Size
    test_4g.zip    test_4g.txt         14,454 KB   562,951,376,907,238 KB
    test_4g_V.zip  test_4g.txt         14,454 KB   8,796,110,221,518 KB
    test_4g_W.zip  test_4g.txt         14,454 KB   1,464,940,363,777 KB
       Faced with these unrealistic sizes, Windows Explorer refuses to
    extract the member file, for lack of (petabytes of) free disk space.
       The archive test_4g.zip has the following Extra Blocks: universal
    time (type = 0x5455) and 64-bit sizes (type = 0x0001).  test_4g_V.zip
    has: PWWARE VMS (type = 0x000c) and 64-bit sizes (type = 0x0001).
    test_4g_W.zip has: NT security descriptor (type = 0x4453), universal
    time (type = 0x5455), and 64-bit sizes (type = 0x0001).  Obviously,
    Info-ZIP UnZip has no trouble correctly finding the 64-bit size info in
    these archives, but Windows Explorer is clearly confused.  (Note that
    "1,464,940,363,777 KB" translates to 0x0005545500000400 (bytes), and
    "0x00055455" looks exactly like the size, "0x0005" and the type code
    "0x5455" for a "UT" universal time Extra Block, which was present in
    that archive.  This is consistent with the hypothesis that the wrong
    data in the Extra Field are being interpreted as the 64-bit size data.)
       Without being able to see the source code involved here, it's hard to
    know exactly what it's doing wrong, but it does appear that the .zip
    reader used by Windows Explorer is using a very (too) simple-minded
    method to extract 64-bit size data from the Extra Field, causing it to
    get bad data from a properly formed archive.
       I suspect that the engineer involved will have little trouble finding
    and fixing the code which parses an Extra Field to extract the 64-bit
    sizes correctly, but if anyone has any questions, we'd be happy to help.
       For the Info-ZIP (http://info-zip.org/) team,
       Steven Schweda

    > We can't get the source (info-zip) program for test.
       I don't know why you would need to, but yes, you can:
          http://www.info-zip.org/
          ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/src/
    You can also get pre-built executables for Windows:
          ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/win32/unz600xn.exe
          ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/win32/zip300xn.zip
    > In addition, since other zip application runs correctly. Since it should
    > be your software itself issue.
       You seem to misunderstand the situation.  The facts are these:
       1.  For your convenience, I've provided three test archives, each of
    which includes a file larger than 4GiB.  These archives are valid.
       2.  Info-ZIP UnZip (version 6.00 or newer) can process these archives
    correctly.  This is consistent with the fact that these archives are
    valid.
       3.  Programs from other vendors can process these archives correctly.
    I've supplied a screenshot showing one of them (7-Zip) doing so, as you
    requested.  This is consistent with the fact that these archives are
    valid.
       4.  Windows Explorer (on Windows 7) cannot process these archives
    correctly, apparently because it misreads the (Zip64) file size data.
    I've supplied a screenshot of Windows Explorer showing the bad file size
    it gets, and the failure that occurs when one tries to use it to extract
    the file from one of these archives, as you requested.  This is
    consistent with the fact that there's a bug in the .zip reader used by
    Windows Explorer.
       Yes, "other zip application runs correctly."  Info-ZIP UnZip runs
    correctly.  Only Windows Explorer does _not_ run correctly.

  • Must close Windows Explorer when installing 7.2 on Vista OS.

    What's the story with that? When trying to install 7.2 on Vista Home Premium a box comes up telling me "The following programs are running which some files need to be upgraded, Please close these programs and try again." Well, that program happens to be Windows Explorer. Luckily I chose a different installtion path so I didn't upgrade over 7.1.1, after reading about all the problems people are having with 7.2. Can anyone tell me why a program would need the core of the OS to close? It makes absolutely no sense to me at all.
    Dell Dimension 5150   Windows Vista  
    Dell Dimension 5150   Windows Vista  

    Well, that program happens to be Windows
    Explorer.
    are you sure it isn't saying Internet
    Explorer? (if the QTPlugin has been used in that
    recently, the itunes/quicktime installer bundle will
    ask to close IE.)
    Nope, it was windows explorer, not IE.

  • After Firefox update, pages are redirected whenever I type a letter or try to enter url, different redirects based on letter I type. Opens a windows explorer window, goes to original login, opens Start/Run window with cmd in box etc.

    Please send some advice if you have any ideas of how to solve this issue.
    The info that is shown about my computer is not accurate. The machine with the problems below is running 64 bit Vista but I cannot access a site like this one due to the constraints listed below.
    I fell for what I thought was a Firefox update but since installing it, when entering a URL, I am redirected back to original computer log in / password entry box. If I use my browser window drop down list I can get into something like Facebook and move around but as soon as I try to type any letter into a 'comment' box, I am redirected to both a Windows Explorer type page showing my various drives and another Window from my Start/Run with the dialog box open with cmd entered in it already. Certain typed letters don't show up at all when trying to enter a 'comment' on Facebook while various letters get various different responses. It is impossible to enter any URL or use my browser other than the items in my drop down. Once there, say to my bank account, I cannot enter any password as I am immediately redirected to someplace else upon trying to type a letter or character. I don't know how to get my browser working. I have tried IE as well and the same thing happens. All started after the supposed upgrade of Firefox. Your help would be appreciated. Thank you.

    Please send some advice if you have any ideas of how to solve this issue.
    The info that is shown about my computer is not accurate. The machine with the problems below is running 64 bit Vista but I cannot access a site like this one due to the constraints listed below.
    I fell for what I thought was a Firefox update but since installing it, when entering a URL, I am redirected back to original computer log in / password entry box. If I use my browser window drop down list I can get into something like Facebook and move around but as soon as I try to type any letter into a 'comment' box, I am redirected to both a Windows Explorer type page showing my various drives and another Window from my Start/Run with the dialog box open with cmd entered in it already. Certain typed letters don't show up at all when trying to enter a 'comment' on Facebook while various letters get various different responses. It is impossible to enter any URL or use my browser other than the items in my drop down. Once there, say to my bank account, I cannot enter any password as I am immediately redirected to someplace else upon trying to type a letter or character. I don't know how to get my browser working. I have tried IE as well and the same thing happens. All started after the supposed upgrade of Firefox. Your help would be appreciated. Thank you.

  • How can I get iTUNES library to display renamed files and folders (renamed with Windows Explorer)?

    How can I get iTunes library to display the new names and organisation of tracks and albums (ie files and folders) that I have renamed and reorganised (using Windows Explorer) having previously imported them using iTunes?
    (Even when I relocate "lost" tracks in iTunes (using the drop down menu facility to view in Windows explorer), although iTunes will then play the track, and knows where to find it, it refuses to display the track with its correct (new) name, or show it the correct (new) album.  That means I have lots of things called "Untitled" and "Track 01" etc, all of which have actually been renamed, but iTunes does not seem to have the capability to recognise the changes and update its library listing.  Another example - a Tchaikovsky CD with 3 major works in 13 tracks insists on displaying in iTunes as 13 tracks in one album, despite the fact that I have reorganised the tracks into 3 albums - two being Swan Lake and The Nutcracker - and renamed the individual tracks to a more useable format.)

    Thanks for your replies ckuan
    I agree with Tgod that your first solution does not work.  It appears unpredictable whether the old or new file names are listed when you drag the folders into iTunes from Windows Explorer.  The folder structure is completely missing.  I reckon if you have to muck around spending days/weeks/months finding out how to fix links to a secret meta-file (obviously designed by some deep-cover microsoft worm working in the Apple!), then it's pretty obvious that almost any alternate way of doing this would be better.   Bye bye iTunes!!
    Incidentally, I tried several other things that (if the software was designed intuitively) should work, but give disastrous results:
    1) when deleting the library listing in iTunes, it gives you two options - one is to remove the listings to the Recycler.  Be aware that IF you select that option, it removes not only your library listing, but also your ACTUAL MUSIC FILES to the Recycler.  Moreover, it does NOT remove the insidious secret meta-file that is what apparently keeps rewriting old names over your carefully renamed file names, and keeps totally ignoring your carefully designed folder (album) structure.  OK - not a complete disaster, as I realised and went hunting through the chaos in the Recycler to recover all my files.  No thanks to the genius who designed this brilliant feature!
    2) after deleting the library listing in iTunes, I attempted to import just the folders that I wanted.  iTunes refused to allow me to do that, and proceeded to try to import every frigging music file it could find on my whole hard drive, in apparently random fashion into the library.  Whoever thought up that doozy either never ever tried to use or market test it, or has modified their mind rather too many times with artificial substances so their brain is like muesli chop suey.
    3) oh why go on, it's too depressing ...

  • How can I display the folders in an ftp site in Windows Explorer during a Firefox web browsing session?

    I would like to view and select multiple files from a folder on an ftp site and copy them to a folder on my computer, but with Firefox it seems I have to plod through one file at a time. In IE there is a Page button which has an option to display the site in Windows Explorer, which allows me to select and copy as many files as I want at one time.
    Does such a feature exist in Firefox, or an approximation?
    Thank you

    That is done via an onbeforeunload or onunload event that displays a JavaScript alert.
    *https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.onbeforeunload
    *https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.onunload
    You can try to search for a Greasemonkey script to reset and block such events.
    *http://www.greasespot.net/ - Greasemonkey
    *http://wiki.greasespot.net/Main_Page - GreaseSpot

  • Windows Explorer copy wrongly offers to merge folders

    When copying a folder tree to an empty(!) location using Windows Explorer it often complains about folders already existing in the target location and offers a merge.
    This is reproducible on all my machines:
    Using Windows Explorer
    select c:\windows
    copy to an empty directory
    Windows shows a dialog "Confirm Folder Replace", offering to merge Windows folder with different create date
    I posted about this problem a long time ago, but did not get an explanation.
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7itprogeneral/thread/f44f2402-809f-4a53-a009-df58463a0cac/#49661e88-1eed-43a0-9e74-dedcb07bfc0f

    We have just experienced a similar problem for the first time and think we can at least partially explain it.  We are copying the "My Pictures" folder from our c: drive to an external disc drive, where we then rename it with the date appended. 
    But when we tried to copy it again a month later, we got the erroneous merge dialog box, just like everyone else.  We tried renaming the old folder (with the date appended) to something completely different, but it didn't make any difference -- we
    still got the merge message that said our two different folders had the same name.   Huh?!
    We think the problem is related to this:  we saw in one of our Windows 7 books that "My Documents" is just a localized "display" name for the ACTUAL file system name
    for that directory, which is just "Documents".  (The connection is made through some hidden Desktop.ini file that points to a system file named Shell32.dll ... don't go there!)
    Anyway, this is a "feature" allows us to DISPLAY the name of the "Documents" folder as anything we want, in any language we want, without actually changing the name of the "Documents"
    directory in the file system itself.  You can verify this by bringing up an old "DOS" command prompt window and using the DIR command to view the actual directory names in your user profile:  the actual file system directory name is still "Documents",
    no matter what you (or Microsoft) has renamed it to be displayed as (in our case, "My Documents").
    To our sorrow, we discovered that this property is "inherited" when we copied the "My Documents" to an external drive for backup and then renamed it with a date suffix, ie, "My Documents 2011-03-05".  As it
    turns out, we were only renaming the folder
    display name.  If we again use a command prompt to look at the directory structure on the
    external drive, the actual file system directory name on the backup drive is still "Documents" (!!!!!).
    Now, when you try to do a copy/paste of one of these folders, Windows 7 appears to be slightly schizo.  We think it looks at the
    actual file system directory names when doing the paste, so (in our case) it sees a sub-directory already named "Documents" in the target folder and decides it's time to put up the folder merger
    dialog. 
    But when it generates the (erroneous) folder merger dialog window, is uses the local display names for those two folders (which are different).  So you end up with a ridiculous looking message
    which, in effect, says "Your target already has a folder named "ABC" so do you want me to merge folder "DEF" into it?"  But at the file system level, it thinks you're trying to copy a directory named "Documents" into a parent folder that already
    has a sub-directory with that same name.
    We can even "catch" Windows 7 erroneously using the actual file system directory name if we click-hold-drag (in order to move) our renamed "My Documents 2011-03-05" folder from one folder to another folder on the external drive. 
    The move operation works fine, BUT after the move, the name of the "My Documents 2011-03-05" folder has been altered to display as, you guessed it, simply "Documents". 
    Yikes!!! Since when does a simple click-hold-drag to move a folder also RENAME that folder?
    So far, we've only caught this happening on directories/folder-names that ship with the OS itself, such as "Documents"/"My Documents", "Pictures"/"My Pictures", etc.  It did
    not happen with a "Windows Live Mail" directory that we are also periodically copying to our external drive, presumably because Windows Live Mail 2011 was installed separately from the OS.
    Well, we don't think we can fight this bug, so we're switching to a new strategy for our backups.  We now create a new folder on the external drive with the backup date in it, ie "2011-03-05" and then copy the "My Documents",
    "My Pictures" , etc. etc. folders to that new "dated" backup folder.  This avoids duplicate subdirectory names going into the same folder, and lets the OS call the copied folder name a-n-y-t-h-i-n-g it wants to!  Plus
    we don't have to append the date to the copied backup folder names any more.  As an added bonus, when we see that the "2011-03-05" backup folder is so old that we don't need to keep it anymore, we can just delete that folder and all of its subfolders
    and files, and that backup is history.   

  • User cannot access redirected Documents folder, but can connect to share in Windows Explorer and access folder on server

    I am in the final stages of a cross-forest migration.  Users have Windows 7 workstations with redirected folders on a Windows Server 2012 box running in the old forest.  User accounts were not migrated.  The accounts in use have always
    been in the "new" forest.  One of our challenges was the large volume of data in redirected folders.  I made sure users in the target forest had continued to have access to their redirected folders in the old forest and robocopied
    the entire users share, copying the permissions with the files.  By doing incremental robocopies, we can get a final copy done now in about six hours.  The plan was simple: copy the files, do an incremental copy every night, on the night of the cutover
    change the folder redirection policy Documents path from
    \\oldserver\users\%USERNAME% to
    \\newserver\users\%USERNAME%. The policy is configured to NOT copy user files from the existing folder to the new redirected folder.  Everything was going well until I tested the policy change.  After the folder redirection policy is updated
    and applied, the user cannot access the private Documents folder.  For example, user Chester Tester logs on as ctester.  I open Windows Explorer and click the Documents shortcut.  I see one subfolder, which is subfolder of Public Documents. 
    So I can look at Public Documents but when I click on the Documents folder (Under the Documents library link) I get an access denied error.  Now for the kicker, if I open another Windows Explorer window and edit the address bar to
    \\newserver\users\ctester, I can navigate the Documents folder tree and see my thousands of documents. What the ....?
    I'm hoping this is something really simple to fix!
    TIA

    HI Vivian,
    Thank you for your reply.  Yes, the path in Group Policy Folder Redirection Root Path was updated to
    \\NEWSERVER\users.  I had planned to point this to the distributed file system, so the first used was actually
    \\domain\dfs\users.  To simplify things I have backed off to copying to just a normal share
    \\newserver\users. 
    We are using BASIC folder redirection and we create a folder for each user under the root path. 
    We did not want the policy to move content, as we were seeing users requiring 15-20 minute logon times  (or higher) after the policy is changed.
    Grant the User exclusive right to Documents - Disabled
    Move the contents of Documents to the new location - Disabled
    Related folder settings
    Video - Follow Documents
    Music - Follow Documents
    Pictures - Follow Documents
    Now when I change the folder redirection from old server to new server I now have TWO My Documents folders in the user's redirection folder on the server.  The redirected Documents points to an empty folder set.  The copied folders with all user
    data are there, but folder redirection refuses to recognize the original folder.
    I am looking at the full view of the folder, nothing hidden, so I'm wondering how a folder can have two subfolders with the exact same name.  For now, I just want the redirection to move from the old server to the new server properly.  I deleted
    the new My Documents folder, rebooted the user's workstation and tried again.  The behavior repeats itself, i.e., a new My Documents folder is always created when the redirection policy is changed from the old server to the new server.  The environment
    has about 1500 users with approximately 1.3TB of data in the redirected Documents folders.  OUCH!

  • Windows Explorer no longer displays the LAN computers

    Hi
    I use Windows 7 SP1 Ultimate 64 bit, I'm in
    a local area network (peer to peer), I not do use the homegroup service and I have no
    firewall/antivirus activated.
    Now, I have a computer that has problems of
    resource sharing:
    1) When opening Windows Explorer from
    this computer, the LAN computers are no longer
    displayed. If I access these computers
    via \\<Computer-Name>, I see
    only their resources but I do not see
    their shared folders. How come?
    2) All the resources shared
    on this machine are no longer accessible to
    other computers. How come?
    Thanks
    Bye
    Balubeto

    Hi,
    This behavior may also be caused by following factors:
    •NetBIOS over TCP/IP is not turned on (enabled).
    •The Computer Browser service is not started or is turned off.
    •Then File and Print Sharing for Microsoft Networks is corrupted.
    Please follow these steps to check these factors:
    Step 1: Enable NetBIOS over TCP/IP
    1.Click Start, click Control Panel, and then click Network and Internet Connections.
    2.Right-click Local Area Connection, and then click Properties.
    3.Click Internet Protocol version 4 (TCP/IPv4), and then click Properties.
    5.Click the General tab, and then click Advanced.
    6.Click the WINS tab.
    7.Under NetBIOS setting, click Enable NetBIOS over TCP/IP, and then click OK two times.
    8.Click Close to close the Local Area Connection Properties dialog box.
    9.Close the Network Connections window.
    Step 2: Start the Computer Browser service
    1.Click Start, type services in Search box, and then click Services.
    2.On the right side, right-click Computer Browser, and then click Restart.
    3.Close the Service window.
    Step 3: Install File and Print Sharing for Microsoft Networks
    1.Click Start, click Run, type ncpa.cpl, and then click OK.
    2.Right-click Local Area Connection, and then click Properties.
    3.Highlight File and Print Sharing for Microsoft Networks, and then click uninstall.
    4.Repeat above steps and check on File and Print Sharing for Microsoft Networks to install this item again.
    If the issue still persists, please post back the error message when you try to access the shared folder or files.
    Kate Li
    TechNet Community Support
    I tried all your suggestions but all
    is remained unchanged and no error is displayed.
    Now, what can I do to fix this problem?
    Thanks
    Bye
    Balubeto

Maybe you are looking for

  • My hotmail does not work on my ipad

    Hi I have just bought an i pad 3 and , with help it is now up and running..phew. But I cannot get it to access my hotmail account. Wi Fi is on as I can use safari. I put in my email and my hotmail password.... it says I cannot access the server. On m

  • 865PE Neo2 -FIS2R Problems

    I purchased a brand new MSI 865PE Neo2-FISR along with a P4 2.4C(OEM), a Thermaltake Spark 5c cooler and a Corsair XMS Twinpack(TWINX512-3200C2PT) of DDR400 memory. The install went fine, the system booted and ran very well right out of the box.  I i

  • How can i delete unwanted songs from iTunes match?

    With a limit on how many songs that can be uploded to iTunes match, how can i remove songs that i didn't want uploaded to the Cloud?

  • 24" LED Cinema Display with my MacBook (2008)

    I would be so grateful for some assistance and advice .... Today I received my new 24" LED Cinema Display ... unfortunately, it did not come with any written instructions or directions. I tried to hook it up to my MacBook using the USB connection, bu

  • How do I get to this particular menu?

    Hi there, I just bought my first ipod touch. I was just holding it in my hand while music was playing on it, and I was glancing at my computer monitor and reading something. Then I looked back at my ipod and I noticed a menu I had never seen before.