Windows not supporting Java after 2004

I read in a new flash a few months ago that Windows was not going to support java after 2004. Does that mean that everything written in java for windows will no longer run. Should I be looking for a different programming language if I want to write a program for window??

It isn't an issue of support so much as an issue of MS not being able to hose the java language. This was all part of the lawsuit Sun brought against MS for having an "imcompatible" version of java in the browser. They are simply not going to ship a browser that has a java VM in it. I say this is good news, for a couple of reasons:
1> applets suck
2> Sun will provide a downloadable (just like they do now) plug-in.
3> nobody has to deal with 1.1.4 or whatever the crappy version of java MS had written
Unless your bussiness is reliant on applets (higly unlikely) don't worry about it, Java will remain on the server side for a long time to come. However I would say this (please don't flame me unless you have experience with C# and disagree) C# is quit an improvement on Java (at least sytactically and symatics wise) if you only need to write for Windows (There is a project under way to port .NET to other platforms and C# was one of the first languages implemented).

Similar Messages

NOKIA lumia windows 8 phones not supporting JAVA

Hi Nokia lumia latest windows 8 phones not supporting java. I Think its a big draw back because we cant install any java apps like Mobile banking Apps. Java apps market increasing day by day. Why nokia avoid this feature. is there any solution for this problem.

no solution unfortunately, however you may be able to try your luck with the WebApps app from the Store, and then search for your particular mobile banking website within that app.
and no, it is not Nokia that is not implementing support for Java, it is part of the Microsoft Windows Phone 8 operating system. if you wish to leave feedback with them, you can do so over at http://windowsphone.uservoice.com

Load balancing 10g forms - Connection from new browser window not supported

Load balancing 10g forms - Connection from new browser window not supported
We're experimenting with using webcache to load balance between multiple applications servers running OC4J forms processes.
We currently have one machine with infrastructure and mid-tier (BI & Forms) installed, which is being used for the webcache functionality, this is load balancing between 2 other servers each of which just have the mid-tier (BI & Forms) installation
In order to get this to work, I had to follow the instructions in the Forms deployment guide : http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_11/web.1012/b14032/tuning.htm#sthref707
The main gist of this is that you need to set the following in the orion-web.xml file in order that the sessions are maintained:
<session-tracking
cookies="enabled">
</session-tracking>
This all works fine in most cases.
The problem I am having is if I do one of the following on the client machine:
1) From IE6 / IE7 run a copy of a forms application. Then open a new window using the "New Window" menu option, and attempt to run another forms application.
2) In IE7 or Firefox 2.0 open a copy of the forms application, and then open a new tab and try and open another forms application.
If I try either of these I get a FRM-92101 error, and the following is displayed in the java console:
oracle.forms.net.ConnectionException: Connection from new browser window not supported
From trawling various forums (including metalink and otn) it looks like a problem with the way coockies are handled.
Unfortunately the usual workaround is to ensure that the session tracking option in the orion-web.xml file is disabled.
The problem is that I need this enabled in order for the load balancing to work.
Does anyone know of any other workarounds or patches that might help resolve this?
We're using Application server 10.1.2.0.2 running on windows 2003 servers.

You were right. Carriage returns were stopping it from working (the document is laid out over separate lines, so I assumed it would make no difference...).
I've now managed to get it so the forms at least run, but they are all being run in the forms OC4J instance on the same machine as the OHS.
Has anyone actually managed to get this to work, or am I doing something wrong?
I did wonder if using an OHS instance on a machine with no forms installation would make any difference?
I had raised a support call via metalink on this subject, but they eventually came to the conclusion that the only way to do this is with a hardware load balancer (Despite several documents suggesting that webcache is the way to go (including the forms deployment manual)).
I'm at the point now of giving up and writing some custom scripts to do the job instead...

Version 3.6.14 has a bug & does not support Java to play Pogo games - How do I install a earlier version?

Pogo games plays on Java - the last version of Firefox 3.16.14 has a bug that does not support Java - I have been instructed by Pogo to install an earlier version of Firefox. How do I do that?

Firefox 3.6.15 was just released to fix that Bug.
You can use Help > '''Check for Updates''' to trigger an update to Firefox 3.6.15.

I use mini i pad but is not support java ... Thi is whorse ..... Do somthing .... U r apple ... So u have to find a way to work the webpages that need java ...

Ill try to work with some pages that need java .... And apple not support java ???
How i work with java ? There is a way to work and downloding the pages ?

1. We are not Apple. This is a user to user forum.
2. Java is not supported because it does not meet Appleñs security criteria for their mobile OS.
3. You can download brwosers from the App store that support Java, though it may not be 100%. Search for "Java Browser" in the App store.
4. For feedback use the feedback link. http://www.apple.com/feedback/

I have recently purchased the latest ipad. Got to say I am extremely dissapointed that it does not support Java or Flash which are platforms needed to do online business banking. I am now faced with ditching it and replacing it with a competitors product

I have recently purchased the latest ipad. Got to say I am extremely dissapointed that it does not support Java or flash which are platforms needed to do online business banking. I am now faced with ditching an expensive toy for a competitors product that offers full business functionallity. Is there any way round this ? It seems extremely bad form on apples part not to support this or make it very clear of the products limitations at the time of purchase.

Well, my bank has an app but the website does not use Flash or Java. While my credit union doesn't have an app, their website doesn't require Flash or Java either.
I pay all my bills online, bank, and access my brokerage accounts. None of the sites I have encountered require Flash or Java. Some government sites do require Flash so I use Photon, it's a browser that does Flash content very well. So you might check out some alternatives browsers.
Otherwise I suppose you will either dump you bank, your iPad, or just not do online banking.

R3D File Format Not Supported (even after downloading the REDCINE-X plugin) . . . Help!

So I'm currently attempting to import my RED footage into Premier CS4.
I've all ready downloaded the Redcine-X plugin for Premier Pro.
The Problem(s):
(1) My media browser acknowledges the file however, it won't play in my
preview window nor will it import.
(2) I'm not given the RED Format Preset in my New Sequence window
when I attempt to make a new sequence.
I was wondering if anyone knows any solutions and could possibly help
me out, thoughts?

installing REDCINE-X won't do anything for CS4.
you need a CS4 plugin:
REDCODE CS4 Win 1.3.msi
SUMMARY: Provides native REDCODE media (R3D) support for
Premiere Pro CS4 (4.0.1 and later) and After Effects CS4 (9.0.1 and later).
Includes: REDCODE importer (v1.3.0), After Effects Settings Dialog
and workflow guide. Note: Supports RED ONE cameras up through Build 18.
unfortunately, it seems to be gone from the RED site.
hahahahahahaha!!!

QuickTime not supported on After Effects

Hey everyone
I have spent some time trying to figure this out on my own and looked at a whole bunch of the threads and forums on here to help figure out my issue, but alas I can't. I know that people have expressed an issue with this before, but After Effects was working fine for me until a couple days ago and this was the first time I saw this message
Before I begin.
I am working with Adobe CS5 Suite, so any and all other programs (premiere, media encoder) are saying that .mov (quicktime) files are not supported and they failed to import.
I am working on a windows 7 PC
64-bit operating system
This is the warning that pops up when I first open After effects.
I didn't understand this warning because I have QuickTime and it works fine.
I still wanted to check to see if I was able to import the file.
Even still, I tried importing a different file and the same message popped up.
I know that these files work. I have played them through QuickTime and tested them and they are not damaged. and the 01.mov file has been imported into after effects and premiere before, which was why I wanted to test this file as well.
And here is a shot that shows taht the file is playing, and that in the upper left you see the quicktime icon.
I changed my administrator permission for quicktime, thinking I didn't have permission anymore for some reason. re-installed QuickTime (now having the most up-to-date version) and the same message keeps popping up.
My QuickTime component folder was empty when I went to look at it. I remember reading elsewhere that maybe I needed to remove the components and see which one was the issue, but there is nothing in there.
I am unaware if there are any third party plug ins that could be causing this issue?
I also wasn't able to figure out how to allow communication with After Effects and QuickTime through the firewall software that I have
Maybe that would be the issue? I don't even know if they are or aren't communicating between themselves already or not.
What confuses me is that bringing in a .mov file was never an issue before. and then these error messages started to happen.
Here is another error message I was getting when working with Media Encoder. I tried bringing in the same file as above to see if I couldn't convert it.
This was the error message that I received.
I guess I'm asking if anyone else is still having this issue with .mov files trtying to be imported into After Effects, Premiere, and Media Encoder. And if so, how did you fix your issues?
Thank you for any input that you guys may have to help me fix this.
- Steve

Hey Todd
Thank you for your input and help.
First, I do not have any issues anymore with my dynamic link and being able to export projects or convert file formats anymore. I do not know why I was unable to do so before, but i recently was able to connect and export 3 separate different projects since the post I added about a month ago. One of them being the project I am currently working on that I posted the QuickTime question about.
I also went to check for software updates under the Help drop down menu in After Effects and it said that all the software was up-to-date. (I have version 10.0.2 - maybe there is an update that my software isn't recognizing that I would need to install that could fix the issue?)
I can give more details that were listed in the "information I should provide.." link that you sent over.
I am running After Effects with the Creative Suite CS5.0 and the version of After Effects I have is 10.0.2
I also have an external Matrox Max for uploading some content onto my computer.
My desktop is a Windows 7 as previously stated.
12 GB RAM
64-bit operating system
Intel Core i7 CPU Processor x980 @ 3.33GHz
And the QuickTime that i have is 7.75.80.95
Maybe If I can't get a new software update for AE (if my AE is not up to date), I could try installing an older version of QuickTime? Maybe that would solve the issue?
I just tried deleting that folder from "AppData>Roaming>Adobe>After Effects>10.0" rebooted after effects and the computer, and that didn't work.

GTX 970 not supported? After Effects error: Ray-traced 3D: Initial shader compile failed ( 5070 :: 2 )

I am disappointed to find that my MSI GTX 970 is not supported for Ray-traced 3D in Adobe After Effects CC 2014.
My configuration:
Intel Core i7 4790k 4.4GHz
8GB DDR3 1333MHz RAM (Will be upgrading to 16GB soon)
MSI GTX 970 Gaming 4G
Windows 8.1 Pro x64
GPU Specs:
Fast Draft:
Available
Texture Memory:
1562 MB
Ray-tracing:
CPU
(GPU not available - incompatible device or CUDA driver)
OpenGL
Vendor:
NVIDIA Corporation
Device:
GeForce GTX 970/PCIe/SSE2
Version:
2.1.2 NVIDIA 344.75
Total Memory:
3.81 GB
Shader Model:
4.0 or later
CUDA
Driver Version:
Devices:
Current Usable Memory:
Maximum Usable Memory:
I do have the option to "Enable untested, unsupported CPU for CUDA acceleration or ray-traced 3D renderer" but when I do enable it I get an error saying:
"After Effects error: Ray-traced 3D: Initial shader compile failed. ( 5070 :: 2 )"
then
"After Effects error: Ray-traced 3D: Cannot create context for ray tracer ( 5070 :: 2 )"
then another
"After Effects error: Ray-traced 3D: Out of paged mapped memory for ray tracer. Your project may exceed GPU limits. Try closing other applications. Try updating the CUDA driver. ( 5070 :: 2 )"
I have the most recent Nvidia driver. Anyway to fix this? Or am I going to have to wait for Adobe to support my GPU?

Hi LMn0P,
LMn0P wrote:
I'm hoping Adobe plans to at least recognize these cards one day soon so they don't show up unsupported. If anything I would expect the newer adobe software to work better with newer cards than it should with 5 year old quadro cards.
I know a situation like this can be very frustrating, sorry about that.
Unfortunately, the newer Maxwell NVIDIA GPUs ship without the OptiX Library and acceleration of ray-traced 3D compositions is dependent on that. Therefore, acceleration of these comps will not ever be supported with those GPUs. You may want to reinstall that Quadro card if you plan on doing a lot of ray-traced 3D work.
The After Effects team does recommend that you move forward with Cinema 4D Lite, as that is what is being tested and supported currently and going into the future.
Thanks,
Kevin

Why nokia 500 will not support widgets after the b...

please reply....why nokia 500 willnot support widgets after the belle update...i buy this phone for belle and all its specs...
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Having read the FAQ on the Nokia Homepage (I'm assuming this is what you meant...) this is what is mentioned.
"Nokia Belle is specifically tailored to each phone model, including the Nokia 500. Due to technical specifications, Nokia Belle for Nokia 500 differs to other Nokia Belle phones in the following aspects:
Nokia 500 with Nokia Belle only supports 4 homescreens.
Nokia 500 does not support NFC.
FM transmitter and widget are not supported in Nokia 500.
Nokia 500 includes Nokia Maps 3.06 instead of 3.08.
Additionally, Nokia 500 will get Angry Birds with the Nokia Belle update"
Basically, due to technical limitations, you will get
1) 4 homescreens
2) There is no NFC or FM transmitter therefore you do not get THOSE widgets.
You SHOULD get all the other widgets (the only reason you will not get the FM and NFC widgets is because you don't have that hardware. That's how I read it anyway.
Hope this helps.

Why does Apple not support Java Runtime Environment?

I am a U.S. Armed Forces Service Member, and I have ran into this problem so many times along with millions of other people, and I would like to ask Apple why don't you support JRE? My job requires me to use websites that is designed for government use to run on Java. I travel a lot, and I work on the go; I love using my apple products such as the IPad, but when it comes down the sites that I must use, I can't. It is very frustrating and impossible to get the job done without accessing these sites. Apple, you would get so much more support/business if you would allow your faithful followers to have access to Java. Specifically JRE 1.5+. I still do not understand the reason why Apple has consistently refuse to work with Java based application. Apple, please swallow your pride and give your supporter something to keep going with. Thank you.
Regards,
U.S. Navy Service Member.

One take on it here:
http://www.codenameone.com/3/post/2013/01/why-oracle-wont-issue-java-for-ios-any time-soon.html
As James said, you can comment to Apple, but given the many serious security problems that have and continue to be discovered in Java, the chance of Apple implementing or allowing a Java engine in iOS is vanishingly small.
Expanding on what Phil said, there is at least one app/service combination, VirtualChrome, which says it supports Java. But you could achieve the same result with probably more control over security by just taking control of a desktop system running Java.
Regards.

After updating it to ios 7.0.3 my BBM is not supporting images, after updating it to ios 7.0.3 my BBM is not supporting images

after updating my iphone5 to ios7.0.3 my BBM is not supporting images

I guess it is.
Do you have a question, or are you just sharing your experience with us?

Windows XP does not support Java!

I was not surprised to see the statement from Microsoft that they will remove the JVM from their new operating system Windows XP, as it is "unecessary files for the user".
This causes a huge problem for all companies basing themselves on making applets. The reason for using applets is to provide web functionality without having to download plug-ins, but now this is no longer workable.
As a solution I request that Sun should come to the rescue here, as Microsoft surely will not be helpful.
What we need is a TINY file that will replace the functionality of the MS Java for the Internet Explorer. No huge 1.3 libraries, only the most basic things needed to run 1.1 applets like the MS virtual machine could. This system should be EXTREMELY easy to install for the end user. Just one click, and only the very, very basic files needed to replace the functionality should be installed. And only for the browser, to save space.
Basically what we need is a Java applet viewer plugin for Internet Explorer, that downloads extremely fast and that has installation procedures almost invisible to the end-user.
I emphasize on TINY (no 5MB huge beast!) and EXTREMELY easy to install. I am aware there exists solutions today, but they do not follow these criterias. This would be like a Java Browser Micro Edition for applets. Also, new VMs seem to be almost in practice non-functinal running applets written for Java 1.0 or 1.1, as we have seen in Netscape 6 which can run only a few existing applets, and very poorly. Please use the 1.1. standard, this will also save downloading time.
I expect Sun to take this seriously, as an applet free web would surely void a lot of work put into this branch of Java. And as a Java developer through several years, I would not think twice leaving Java in favour of C# if Sun does not provide a web browser solution for me, and everyone else depending on applets on the net. Not because I want to, but I see no other real world functional options now.

As a solution I request that Sun should come to the rescue here, as Microsoft surely will not be helpful.<<<You are right. Sun should come to the rescue here. Sun is not only helping us, but also helping Sun itself.
What we need is a TINY file that will replace the functionality of the MS Java for the Internet Explorer. No huge 1.3 libraries, only the most basic things needed to run 1.1 applets like the MS virtual machine could. This system should be EXTREMELY easy to install for the end user. Just one click, and only the very, very basic files needed to replace the functionality should be installed.<<<Good spec!!!
I expect Sun to take this seriously, as an applet free web would surely void a lot of work put into this branch of Java. <<<To get Sun's attention, we should help Sun realize that Java will become un-popular, maybe even disappears, because of this. I am not sure they really care there is a lot of work put into this branch of Java (sorry if I am wrong).
I just don't understand why this type of solution is not available today. Everybody (including a guy like me who is always in the dark) could see what MS would do even two years ago.
Sun, if you don't give us a solution, I will switch to C#, "Not because I want to, but I see no other real world functional options now."
Did I get somebody's attention? Could we get more people to talk to Sun?

Talk about XP not supporting Java!?!

had to move to an XP machine recently.
i don't get BSOD, compile errors, runtime errors (yet)
but when i use the XP Search Companion to look for files containing certain words, it will not return the files if the file extension is .jsp or .java. for example:
1. created a new folder C:\New and file menu.jsp in it containing one line with the words "focus focus focus." i used the following settings in the search dialog:
- A word or phrase in the file: focus
- Look in: New
- Type of file: (All Files and Folders)
DID NOT WORK
2. changed the file extension of menu.jsp to menu.txt and did the same search.
IT WORKED!!!
3. changed the file extension back to .jsp and used following search settings:
- A word or phrase in the file: focus
- Look in: New
- Type of file: Java Server Pages source
DID NOT WORK.
4. changed the file extension to .java and used the following search settings:
- A word or phrase in the file: focus
- Look in: New
- Type of file: (All Files and Folders)
DID NOT WORK.
5. changed the file extension to .xml and used the following search settings:
- A word or phrase in the file: focus
- Look in: New
- Type of file: (All Files and Folders)
IT WORKED.
6. did the same tests on a friend's XP machine, same results
7. i've also tried the following but to no avail:
- XP repair reinstall
- My Computer > Tools > Folder Options > View and unchecked "Hide protected operating system files"
not good. i use this tool a lot. esp when figuring out source code.
i must be missing something real basic here. please post if you know what's going on, have a fix or workaround, have any suggestion, have pointer to where i can look for more help.
thanks much,
--meg

well, Windows NT/2000 has been kind to me in the past years. i wanted it on the new machine but the computer dealer wouldn't support it anymore :(
i'm glad the search is back. grep worked fine for a day but i missed being able to just click on sort columns, click on files and delete/open/rename them, all right in the results window.
little things like this have kept me on windows for development. fortunately, java is quite portable and not much needs changing when moved to the unix production server.
now if only i can pry me away from emacs...
but i digress.
thanks for the replies.
--meg

Fix for iTunes and Windows not recognizing iPod after 7.7 upgrade...

..it worked for me!
XP wanted drivers for the iPod, and I used the method in this doc with one exception:
iPod is not recognized properly by computer when USB drivers are not installed properly or are out of date
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305136
...when the wizard came up and asked to look for the driver, I clicked "Search for the best driver in these locations" except instead of windows/inf I went to system32/drivers and found a subfolder with USBAAPL.SYS [the driver name] in the title... it was a hidden folder so you'll have to have them visible to see it. Using that folder as the target for the search picked it up immediately and then everything was fine.

Hello Overdrive_king,
And welcome to Apple Discussions!
I'm assuming you also tried using different USB ports (preferably ones attached directly to the motherboard) as well as using a different USB cable as well just for good measure?
If you choose Computer from the Start menu, does your iPod show up as a mounted drive there? What happens if you put it into disk mode using the instructions provided here.
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1363
It might also help to try the other solutions mentioned in this article related to your issue as necessary (I know you have already tried a number of them).
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1369
And lastly, it wouldn't hurt to remove and re-install the necessary drivers for your iPod.
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1538
B-rock

Windows not supporting Java after 2004

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for