WIP amount in Financial Statement.

Dear friends,
IN my financial statement huge amount has posted as WIP for a certain period.I settled those production orders already and no longer going to take production against those orders.The status of all those orders are teco,and also we took back the excess material issued agaist those orders and used for some other production orders. So ,now how to treat this WIP amount in Statement,or how to exclude this amount.
Please give me a solution.

Hi Arun,
WIP / variance settlement posting happens ALWAYS during settlement not during WIP calcaulation / variance calculation.
Check T-Code OKGC: there it is defined (depending on order status) when WIP is calculated/ created and when it is reversed.
A most common situation is that WIP is calculated if an PP-order has status PREL / REL and WIP will be canceled / reversed after order has status DLV / TECO (means the order is "finished").
After order has status DLV / TECO, variance calculation (if needed) is starting and after that order settlement posts/cancels WIP AND poste variances (if needed).
So check your process and try this steps for one order and view the results, if OKGC is maintained like described above the WIP should be reversed (if yoiu are calculating WIP in the period where TECO was set).
Best regards, Christian

Similar Messages

Display Financial Statement (S_ALR_87012284) in document currency amount

I would like to display financial statement in document currency amount. (T-CD:S_ALR_87012284)
Does anyone know how to do this?
I don't want to use the special evaluation tab of that T-CD, as it is requested to specify
rate and Key date for translation. I just want to display the amount in document currency.

Hi Ramanuja,
I meant that for the fiscal year 2009 G/L accounts don't have any values in SAP.
In this Company SAP has been installed in 2010 and in Financial Statements I'd like to obtain the comparison with the values of 2009.
What to do?
Thanks

Financial Statement

Hi all
I am creating a customized report of Financial Statement that contains monthly figures for every G/L account.
When I compared my report with the standard FS, I found out in standard FS, there are some G/L are taking amount from previous fiscal year. For example, when I choose to view FS for 2007, some G/L amount are included with amount from fiscal year 2006.
Can anyone explain this, is FS is normally like this. Is it have something related to open and closed items? I dont have deep Finance background anyway.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
az
Edited by: alawiyah zakaria on Feb 25, 2008 4:57 AM

Financial Statement include open items for chosen year and previous years and also close item for chosen fiscal year

Financial Statements report - F.01

Hello,
I posted this question to the abap forum, but maybe you can help me better. As you know, the account amounts from the financial statement report come from financial documents. And when you create a financial document you specify a document type(vendor invoice, vendor payment and many others). What i need to do is modify the report to show only amounts from certain types, not all types. For doing that, i need to know if there is a connection between the financial statement and the documents types. I searched the code of the report and i did not find anything relevant.
Maybe you met this requirement before and talked with an abaper. If that is the case, maybe you can give me a suggestion.
Thank you very much,
Efren

F.01 is build with the following tables. You may go through each table to see if they are document type specific. I would cautio if F.01 is the right report for you/your client.
TABLES:   t001, ska1, bhdgd,
          t011, skat,
          t011t, skb1,
          t009, skc1a,
          t004,
          t009b,
          t009y.
TABLES:   rfsdo.
TABLES:   tgsb.
TABLES:   fimsg.
TABLES:   faglfreesel.

Company Code restriction at Financial statement Version

Hi All,
We have a requirement from business for company code creation, and all elements will be same as existing company code like CHOA, FSV, PPV,FYV,CO Area etc, however my client create this company code fro recalculation of Accural amount, so they want that whatever the document posted should not be reflect to company's corporate books means financial statemen. As iam very new iin this requirement, so request you to kindly suggest that is it possible in SAP. IF yes then how do we restrict company code at Financial statement version.
Thank you for your support in advance.
Regards,
Jamuna

Hi Gaurav,
Thanks for your response, it would be great if you can detailing the same, how do we exclude this field, do i need to take any ABAPER help, and also if this field get excluded, so will business be able to execute this report at company code level by selecting another company code associated with respective COA.
Thanks,
Jamuna

GL & Financial Statement Mismatch

Dear Expert,
There is difference observed between GL & Financial Statement (F.01). An amount is showing in F.01 but it is not in GL (FBL3N). We have 2 ledgers for separate periods. In one ledger the amount shows but in another ledger it is not showing anything.
Please advise how to resolve this error.
Thanks,
Deb

Hi,
If your using New GL Run t code-FAGLGVTR it will update ledger balance
thanks
ashoka

Special Item Net Profit & Net Loss in Financial statement version

I have two queries related to the financial statement version special items of Net Result Profit & Net Result Loss. The SAP help says that "The financial statement profit or loss is determined from only those accounts assigned to assets or liabilities".
Does this mean that the difference of Assets & liabilities comes under either of these items or the amount is derived from the P&L result, please clarify. As per my understanding that we do not assign any accounts to these two nodes & the system determines the figure from assets & liabilities accounts.
Secondly where do we assign the retained earning account, in the liabilities node or in the P&L node.
Thanks

Hello,
For your first question, yes your understanding is correct. The difference of the items assigned to the Assets and Liabilities will come under the Net Result Profit or Net Result Loss, as the case may be.
For your second question, the retained earnings should be assigned to the Liabilities node.
Ideally, when you assign the retained earnings to the Liability node, the Net result Profit or Loss should become "zero" assuming that you had assigned all the GL accounts from your trial balance to the correct nodes in the Financial Statement Version.
Regards,
Mike

Financial Statement Version asper INcome Tax Act

I am trying to configure financial statement version as per income tax act , we have two depreciation area 01 is for Companies Act and other 15 is for Income Tax act, while configuring FSV Depreciation is posting normally in FSV asper Companies Act where in FSV as per Income Tax the depreciation amount is calculated from the Companies Act Depreciation area ie 01. can any one help me to solve these issue. urgent

Hi,
Please maintain the following:
u2022 In OBD4 create a new Account Group for GL Codes that will be used for posting Depreciation of Area 15.
u2022 Create GL Master Data under this New Account Group
u2022 Assign this GL Code to the FSV as per IT Act.
u2022 Map the GL Code in AO90 by selecting Area 15 specifically.
Please refer to the below links on this:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/4f/71fd71448011d189f00000e81ddfac/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/4f/71fd71448011d189f00000e81ddfac/frameset.htm
Regards,
Kiron Kumar T.

Financial Statement Hierarchy with Debit/Credit Indicator

Hi BW Gurus,
We have a requirement for Statutory reporting, wherein we have to seperate G/L accounts by Debits and Credits; i.e. if we have a Financial Statement hierarchy (G/L Account hierarchy), we would have the same G/L account in 2 different nodes, one showing the credit side of it and the other the debit. This hierarchy has been created in ECC, with the debit/credit indicators set accordingly in each node.
Financial Statement Hierarchy
Node 1
- G/L Account ABC - if Credit Balance Only
Node 2
- G/L account ABC - if Debit Balance Only
When I load this hierarchy into BW, we load it as a G/L Account hierarchy. We are nowhere considering the Debit/Credit indicators set for each account. Thus in the report, the credits and debits are not being seperated, defeating the purpose of creating such a hierarchy.
I believe there should be a way to get this working, the way desired. We do have the Debit/Credit indicator (SHKZG field) pulled in with the transaction data into BW. Could I use this as an External Characteristic to G/L Account and add it to my hierarchy? Would that help me in achieving what we are looking for?
Also, we have the Debit Amounts and Credits Amounts coming in seperately as Key Figures. I could create a G/L account structure in my query and restrict by Debit/Credit Indicator, but then we need certain accounts with the Debit Indicator and others with a Credit Indicator within the same node. This would make creating and maintaining the structure a huge effort.
As a thought, would 0GLACCEXT help me out?
We are currently on SAP BW/BI 7.0, Support Package 17, using BEx Analyzer 7.0 (BI Add-on 900).
Any help in this regards is appreciated. Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Vivek
Edited by: Vivek DV on Sep 23, 2009 10:02 AM

Hi Wolfgang,
Please refer to OSS note 663945. This will give you the transfer rule mapping for 0GLACCEXT.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Vivek

S_PL0_86000029 - Financial Statement: Plan/Actual Comparison

Dear Sir,
We are using ECC 6.0 NewGL split functionality in FI. We are using Fiscal Year Variant V3.
I have done Cost Centre planning for the period "8 i.e. for the month
of November" at Version 1 and this is properly getting updated at the
Profit Centre level.
I have not done the planning for the period "9 i.e. for the month of
December" till now.
But when I execute the report- S_PL0_86000029 - Financial Statement:
Plan/Actual Comparison for the period 9 to 9 i. e. December, the
system is giving the Cummulative amount of planning till the month of
November (period 1 to 8) as Planned amount for the period 9 even if I
give period 9 to 9 in the selection criteria.
Basically this report should not show me any planned value in planned
column for the 9th period as I have not done any planning for the 9th
month till now.
Please confirm whether this report (S_PL0_86000029 - Financial
Statement: Plan/Actual Comparison ) is cummulative report, even if we
select a particular period in the selection criteria? If this report is
of cummulative nature is there any other report through which we can
see the planned amount of a particular profit centre for a particular
period.
Plz help ...........we need this report very urgently.
Thank & Regards,
Bijay Kumar Deo

Please check Tcode FAGLGCLE. - Activate Update of plan line items

Financial Statement Verion

Hi Experts,
Can somebody tell me, where we can configure Rounding Off for Financial Statement Verion as I need to do this task as per revised Schedule VI....
Thanks in advance
Mumfico
Edited by: mumfico on Mar 15, 2011 9:09 AM

Hi,
There is only a rounding under Scaling in Selection screen, tab "output control"
The documentation reports following:
Scaling
The output amount can be controlled using this parameter. The default value 0/0 means that the amounts are output in the right currency and in full length.
The entry 3/1 would mean that the amounts would be output in thousands with one decimal place.
hope, this helps.
Regards
Hein

Which info object should be used for Financial statement line (BPS and BCS)

Hi experts.
A rather easy and straightfoward questions for someone out there.
In BPS as we know, we use the info object '0SEM_POSIT' (account groups, or financial statement line) to summamrize and store amounts from groups of accounts or for example data from COPA's value fields, and which is already an attribute of the info object '0ACCOUNT'.
I am told that there is another BCS related info object called '0CS_ITEM' that serves the same purpose, and uses it for the same reason for the purpose of consolidations.
We'd obviously like to use just the one of these info objects because of planning and reporting.
Can someone out there with knowledge in BCS recommend which one to use, and from their experience in the past how they combined the use of both (if you in fact did use both).
Also, is it true that in BCS you cannot use a two characteristic BW hierarchy for consolidations, and it can only consolidate a one characteristic BW hierarchy?
Thanks dearly

Hi Eugene,
I kind of understood what you said, but just incase, let me explain my situation a little clearer. In BPS I'm using 0SEM_POSIT for two reasons:
1) To create hierarchy based on 0SEM_POSIT info object, and making each node postable. This is because on this project we don't plan at account level. Only at a kind of account group/financial statement line level. So each node is postable so that they roll up to the higher levels.
2) I will have 0SEM_POSIT as an attribute of 0ACCOUNT (which is standard delivered as an attribute in BW). This will ensure that I derive the actuals at that the same level as the planned. This is required for two reasons:
                           a) I can have the actuals as comaprison column in the Planning
                               layout.
                           b) I can report on the Actuals vs. Plan at the postable node
                               level in BW queries.
So having explained this, what I understood from your explanation is:
a) I can continue to 0SEM_POSIT as my info object for my postable node hierarchy, and
b) I can also use 0CS_ITEM as a consolidation unit specifically for BCS only.
So what I really didn't understand is:
1) your explanation of the mapping of 0SEM_POSIT to 0CS_ITEM, and what this mapping actually does. For example does 0CS_ITEM derive the values from 0SEM_POSIT because of this mapping? Can you explain this a bit? Is Datastream a tool in BCS by which BCS readinf financial data from other components?
2) Can BCS use a 2 characteristic postable nodes hierarchy as a consolidation unit? For example, if I create ONE hierarchy using 0SEM_POSIT, and 0ACCOUNT. Both will be postable at any level of the hirarchy.
Can BCS consolidate using this 2 characteristic hierarchy structure? OR, must it use 0CS_ITEM info object?
3) How does both 0SEM-POSIT, and 0CS_ITEM co-exist together, in terms of planning, consolidation, and reporting. For example if I report using the 0CS_ITEM hierarchy, then I will not be able to read plan data, because plan data is posted on the 0SEM_POSIT? and vice versa......? This question kind of ties in with 1).
Sorry for the long message, but I wanted to make sure I explained it better.
Thanks for your help

Differences between GL A/C & Financial Statement

Hi all,
We have noted that there are certain differences between the amounts shown in the GL Accounts and the Financial statements.
We have investigated these differences in the depreciation posting and it has revealed that the amount posted in Asset Accounting was slighly lower than that of FI. This difference relates to a transfer from one asset number to another asset number through transaction ABUMN - Enter Asset Transaction : Transfer within Company Code.
Why this difference? Is there some configuration that needs to be done or updated?
Thanks for your help.
Nelmaz

Hi,
a.ABST2 to check/analyse the inconcistency between AA-GL
b.reverse the transfer, run depreciation, repost the transfer and run depreciation.
Rgds.

How to extract the Financial statement version from R/3 to BW

Hi all,
I've used the business content to extract the details of SAP R/3 G/L account details to BW. Now, I need to extract the Financial statement version also from R/3 to SAP. Is there any business content object available for the same?
Thanks in advance,
Sam.

Use cube: 0FIGL_C01 with 0GL_ACCOUNT. Load the text and attributes for 0GL_ACCOUNT and the hierarchy based on FSVs in R/3.Build your Balance Sheets and Income Statemments in this.
If your FSV has balance dependancies: say if the accounts in the FSV move from one node to another depending on their balance at run time, then you will have to use the virtual cube (0FIGL_VC1) along with info-object 0GLACCEXT. However from my experience with VC1, there are a lot of restrictions and inconsistencies that you will have to contend with while working with this cube.
Cheers
Anand

How to Extract Customized Financial Statement Version from R/3 to BW

Hi Gurus,
Could anybody tell me how to Extract Customized Financial Statement Version from R/3 to BW. Also send me docs on FICO and COPA extraction from R/3 to BW.
Thanks in advance...
Regards
Rafi

Sayed
Please see this BW Best Practice link
http://help.sap.com/bp_biv133/
http://help.sap.com/bp_biv235/BI_EN/html/BW/COPABaselineAnal.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_biv235/BI_EN/html/BW/ControllingAnalysis.htm
COPA Business content
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/28/3dc7393b26da1de10000000a114084/content.htm
Hope this helps
Thnaks
Sat

WIP amount in Financial Statement.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for