Wip work order conversion

CAN ANY ONE SEND ME THE documentation for work order conversion.
including the interface tables, base tables , concurrent program and validation columns .
Ineed a clear idea of what is happening. i gone throughed the documents in metalink and open interface documents but i cank get the clear idea how the two interface table is processed to create a work order. please help me
Message was edited by:
user595942

Hi,
Can you please make Ship To also as Primary Business Purpose?
Regards
Raghavender K

Similar Messages

  • How to prevent an error of [WIP work order ... is locked-]

    Hello experts
    Can someone tell me how to prevent an error which [The WIP work order associated with this transaction is currently locked and being updated by another user.  Please wait for a few seconds and try again.Transaction processor error].
    How can you prevent that error?
    P.S.
    Oracle support　told me [When you make data of mtl_transaction_interface, give same transaction_header_id to all data. Then, you kick worker with appointed transaction_header_id. Or, you set up being uncompatible with workers].
    I cannot allow that making with same transaction_header_id and being uncompatible with worker on my system.

    Hi santosh,
    You can implement badi BBP_DOC_CHECK to check vendor email and issue error message.
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • WIP Work Order Report pulling wrong customer

    In the Customer Name field on the WIP Work Order Report it pulls in the Bill To customer instead of the Ship To customer.  Please advise in this regard.
    Thanks in Advance.

    Hi,
    Can you please make Ship To also as Primary Business Purpose?
    Regards
    Raghavender K

  • ESYU: Canceled 상태의 WIP Work order나 Discrete job을 purge 할 수 있는 방법

    Purpose
    Oracle Work in Process - Version: 11.5.2 to 11.5.10
    WIP 사용자 중 Canceled status의 Discrete Jobs이나 WIP Work Orders를 purge
    하길 원하는 user가 있다.
    하지만 standard form은 closed discrete jobs만을 purge 할 수 있다.
    WIP user manual에 따르면 현재 closed 된 accounting period 안에서 closed 된
    discrete jobs에 대한 정보만을 purge 할 수 있다고 되어 있다.
    다음은 이에 대한 work around 이다.
    Solution
    Work Around:
    1. WIP: Discrete> Close Discrete Jobs> Close Discrete Jobs(Form)으로 이동한다.
    2. Find Discrete Jobs parameter에 아래와 같이 입력한다.
    From Job = Close를 원하는 Job
    To Job = Close를 원하는 Job
    Status = Canceled
    3. Tools menu에서 Close 1을 선택한다.
    Close 1을 선택하면 canceled Discrete Job이 closed 가 된다.
    이 때 job number를 기억하고 note 해 둔다.
    4. GL과 Inventory Accounting periods가 close가 될 때, canceled discrete jobs
    (현재는 closed 상태)를 Purge Job form을 이용하여 purge 할 수 있다.
    WIP: Discrete> Purge Discrete Jobs> Purge Discrete Josb from or SRS
    Reference
    Note 429489.1

  • WIP : Work Order Aging report

    Hello,
    Is there any standard program given by Oracle on WIP  as 'Work Order Aging report' ?
    I guess not.
    If its not, then is there any other program related to WIP Aging exists in Oracle?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    Can you please make Ship To also as Primary Business Purpose?
    Regards
    Raghavender K

  • PM Work Order Conversion Advice

    Experts,
    We are currently implementing ECC 6.08 and have a requirement to convert open and historical work orders during the implementation phase.  While we have already selected a BAPI to load the data into the target system, we are now struggling to understand what financial impacts we must watch out for, and how to reconcile related documents (purchase orders, reservations, etc.).
    Has any one completed a conversion of Open PM Work Orders (transaction IW31) in the past u2013 either manually or via an automated conversion?
    If so u2013 how did you manage the complexities of related documents, reconciliation of financial transactions, etc?
    Any advice, old documentation, or planning materials that you may have from a previous project would be fantastic!
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Ranganathan,
    You can use Tcode IW61 to create Historical Orders. The historical orders has no goods movements & settlement. You can directly enter the actual cost during historical order creation.Those orders can be used for cost analysis.
    Regards,
    senthil m

  • PM Work order conversion

    We have redeployment project from 4.6c to ECC6.0, the client wants to migrate the work orders both open and closed to new system. I understand that as a normal process we migrate the Open work orders. Has any one migrated the closed work orders?

    Hi Ranganathan,
    You can use Tcode IW61 to create Historical Orders. The historical orders has no goods movements & settlement. You can directly enter the actual cost during historical order creation.Those orders can be used for cost analysis.
    Regards,
    senthil m

  • Work Order Less Completion Form-Help

    Hello Guys i have a question on WIP- Work Order Less Completion Form.
    In the form when we enter the assemebly item and go to Components-->Lot/Serial, In Lot entry form there is a field called Lot number which has LOV and also allows user to enter his own Value what he needs.
    My question is is there any controls in Oracle where we can prevent user from entering his value in the LOt number field,instead he has to select it from LOV only.
    Please help me on this.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Please see if these documents help.
    Note: 112055.1 - Lot/Serial Control Setups
    Note: 338189.1 - When Receiving an RMA, Lot Number LOV Shows All Lots
    Regards,
    Hussein

  • Budget Exceed Issue in work Order (P.O) in Production Server.

    Hi Friends,
    I am getting different type of budget exceed issue, that to only in Production server.
    Here the issue is when I am creating the work order P.O (Acc.As. Cat.P, Itm Cat. D) with different service line items with respective WBSe with in the budget limit, then I am doing SES for some quantity, now when I am changing (I am decreasing not increasing) the same P.O line item available quantity and creating the new version now system is calculating the old version line item quantity + new version quantity (nothing but double) then giving budget exceed error.
    One more strange thing is, if I change quantity for one line item then system is giving budget exceed error for another line item which is having the different WBSe which was saved with out giving any error at the time of P.O creation.
    This issue is happening only in Production server ....same scenario I have run with the same values in both Dev. and Qau. (Where the config. is same in all 3 clients) but in both the clients it is working fine...but in production why the system is behaving in such a way I am not getting. 
    In the below I have given the test scenario...
    Service P.O Creation
    Line Item
    P.O Quanity
    Value
    WBS
    Budget
    Commitment
    SES. Quatity
    Actual cost
    1
    10
    100
    WBS 1
    2000
    1000
    5
    500
    2
    20
    200
    Wbs 2
    4000
    2000
    10.00
    1000
    3
    30
    300
    WBS 3
    6000
    3000
    15
    1500
    4
    40
    400
    Wbs 4
    8000
    4000
    20.00
    2000
    Service P.O change with new version
    Line Item
    P.O Quanity
    Value
    WBS
    Budget
    Commitment
    SES. Quatity
    Actual cost
    1
    6
    100
    WBS 1
    1000
    1000
    5
    500
    2
    20
    200
    Wbs 2
    2000
    2000
    10.00
    1000
    Budget exceed with the double value
    3
    30
    300
    WBS 3
    3000
    3000
    15
    1500
    4
    40
    400
    Wbs 4
    4000
    4000
    20.00
    2000
    If any one has come across with this type of issue and solved ...please suggest me ..
    Regards,
    Srikanth

    Hi,
    I have face similar issue in deleting PO line items.
    Even though I delete items, system check budget for deleted qty with the currency conversion + value & gives budget exceed error.
    In some cases we have asked user to deactivated AVAC asked to do the transaction, which is not recommended.
    You can try running CJBN & CJBV in sequence for affected WBS.
    Thanks & reg,
    Sam

  • Work order less completion

    Hi ,
    By mistake we have performed WIP Assembly Return through Work order less completion, due to this On hand got reduced.
    Could you please advice how to reverse this transaction.
    Regards
    Ravi

    Hi Ravi,
    Yes, system will not allow to transact the same schedule number again. New schedule number will be generated automatically when you perform the WIP Assy Completion transaction using Work Order-Less Completions window and all the accounting entries will be balanced in the system.
    Regards
    Shabbir

  • Work order via Sub-Inventory level planning

    Hello Team,
    We want to create work order via Sub-Inventory level planning as standard program 'min-max planning report' is nor creating WIP Jobs at sub-inventory level.
    Kindly guide me if this requirement is possible and if so do share your knowledge on it.
    Thanks/Suresh

    You can only create a Move Order or requisition from Min/Max at the Sub Inventory level. To create a job order it is organization level

  • KO8G open work order settlement

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

    Hey Vanessa,
    Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
    I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
    The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
    Problem solved.
    Do you see any other implications on this?
    Thanks again.
    Pradeep

  • Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

    Ashok,
    Thanks for the reply.
    We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
    Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
    Thanks
    Pradeep

  • Using a hierarchy but also showing work orders that are not in hierarchy

    good morning bi people,
    i have a requirement to show data from a hierarchy which includes Operation and Maintenance information. for example it has an account broken into labour/material/trucking and below this is the pm acivity type and secondary cost element (concatenated). this hierarchy is a manually created hierarchy that is uploaded to BW and is not in ECC. The users do not want to see the concatenated field at the end of the hierarchy, but instead, want to see the Work Orders that have the PM activity types.
    At the present time, we have the report using the hierarchy but we need the work orders to replace the pm activity type/secondary cost element concatenated field. the work order field is a free characteristic and when we drag in the work order in analyzer, it works correctly.
    1) is this possible to use the hierarchy and somehow map the work order field to the end of the hierarchy within crystal?
    2) do you have a suggestion to change the hierarchy, without being a manual nightmare?
    all conversations are welcome.
    Erik

    Good Day Ingo,
    i have created a word document with screen shots of the hierarchy from BW, a screen shot of the BEx showing the free characteristic of Maintenance Order and a screen shot of the crystal report with the PM Activity type concatenated to the Cost Element. Once again, we do not wish to see the concatenated field, but rather see the Maintenance orders that have a PM Activity type the same as the concatenated field. 
    here is the link.
    https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B1j5hXTptfntYWI1MDUzNGEtY2MxNy00YmMzLWJjZjEtZDA4OGZiYmMyNzFh&hl=en&authkey=CKq4xcgJ
    thanks Ingo,
    Erik

  • Preparing Report on Work Order

    I am preparing a report on Work Order used in EAM.
    I used EAM_WORK_ORDERS_V to get the details of work orders. But it shows some fields like WIP_ENTITY_ID, WIP_ENTITY_NAME. Does these field mean Work Order Id? I was actually trying to find Work Order Number, Work Order Name etc. Can any one let me know from which field can I get it?
    One more field shows WORK_ORDER_TYPE which has some numbers. There must be some other table where the work order Types are defined. Can any one please let me know which table shall give me the work order types?
    Thanks & Regards
    Hawker

    Wip_entity_name is the work order number.
    Wip_entity_id is a behind-the-scenes id that is used by Oracle to join other wip tables.
    You can get the work order type by using the following sql.
    SELECT lookup_code, meaning
      FROM fnd_lookup_values
    WHERE lookup_type LIKE 'WIP_EAM_WORK_ORDER_TYPE' Hope this helps,
    Sandeep Gandhi

Maybe you are looking for