Budget Exceed Issue in work Order (P.O) in Production Server.

Hi Friends,
I am getting different type of budget exceed issue, that to only in Production server.
Here the issue is when I am creating the work order P.O (Acc.As. Cat.P, Itm Cat. D) with different service line items with respective WBSe with in the budget limit, then I am doing SES for some quantity, now when I am changing (I am decreasing not increasing) the same P.O line item available quantity and creating the new version now system is calculating the old version line item quantity + new version quantity (nothing but double) then giving budget exceed error.
One more strange thing is, if I change quantity for one line item then system is giving budget exceed error for another line item which is having the different WBSe which was saved with out giving any error at the time of P.O creation.
This issue is happening only in Production server ....same scenario I have run with the same values in both Dev. and Qau. (Where the config. is same in all 3 clients) but in both the clients it is working fine...but in production why the system is behaving in such a way I am not getting. 
In the below I have given the test scenario...
Service P.O Creation
Line Item
P.O Quanity
Value
WBS
Budget
Commitment
SES. Quatity
Actual cost
1
10
100
WBS 1
2000
1000
5
500
2
20
200
Wbs 2
4000
2000
10.00
1000
3
30
300
WBS 3
6000
3000
15
1500
4
40
400
Wbs 4
8000
4000
20.00
2000
Service P.O change with new version
Line Item
P.O Quanity
Value
WBS
Budget
Commitment
SES. Quatity
Actual cost
1
6
100
WBS 1
1000
1000
5
500
2
20
200
Wbs 2
2000
2000
10.00
1000
Budget exceed with the double value
3
30
300
WBS 3
3000
3000
15
1500
4
40
400
Wbs 4
4000
4000
20.00
2000
If any one has come across with this type of issue and solved ...please suggest me ..
Regards,
Srikanth

Hi,
I have face similar issue in deleting PO line items.
Even though I delete items, system check budget for deleted qty with the currency conversion + value & gives budget exceed error.
In some cases we have asked user to deactivated AVAC asked to do the transaction, which is not recommended.
You can try running CJBN & CJBV in sequence for affected WBS.
Thanks & reg,
Sam

Similar Messages

  • Budget Exceeded Issue - Activated budget profile for existing project

    Dear Experts,
    I have a Project and not using any budget profile, already actual data exist only in CJI3 no data in CJI5.
    Now I assigned Budget Profile in that project.
    While entering Budget in T-code CJ30, I can see values in assigned values for a wbs elements.
    Example -
    WBS Element - XXXXXX-02  - 2000 (Assigned) - Here Budget Profile not assigned in the project
    Same WBS Element - Once Budget Profile assigned, when am assigning same 2000 budget am getting budget exceeded issue.
    If I give 2500 I am not getting any errors, My tolerance as only Warning message.
    Please Suggest - Screenshot attached
    Thanks,

    Hi Pavan,
    As soon you enter your budgeting fig the availability control triggers, this check your assignment with available budget.this the reason you are getting error as you say there are already actual posting in CJI3.In this you need to balance first the fig which is appear in assigned column in CJ30.
    Its a good practice to give budget first release it & then start procurement,confirmation etc.
    Check this in budget profile availability control.
    Regards,
    Sachin.

  • How to block material issue to work order

    Dear Expert,
    How do block material issue to work order when the item have been flag for deletion in MM module and have also been block for procurement and inventory in mm module.
    Please help

    Hi,
    Thank you for the prompt reply, what you mean by the Standard SAP? can you provide the reference link? I am facing the problem that the item material have been flag for deletion and been block for procurement and inventory in MM module material master data however it still able to material issue to work order. Any ideal how to block the material issue to work order when the material item have been flag for deletion and block for movement in MM material.
    Please help.

  • Goods Issue against Work Order assigned to WBS - Report

    We are doing Goods Issue against Work Order with movement 261, the data picked up from work order is not including
    the WBS element mentioned on the work order. Through this WBS element report is created through MB51, with total receipts, total issues, transfer postings etc made against WBS element, but without WBS element No. in material document,
    we cannot pull this report through MB51, as we see material document No.created against work order but not the WBS
    No. there, so this report cannot be pulled from MB51 through WBS element.
    Does anyone know of any other report that I can pull From WBS No. as all these material documents are hitting WBS with
    total receipts, total issues, transfer postings against the said WBS mentioned in the work order.
    Doing Good issue against WBS is no problem, as the material document saves the WBS No.

    >
    Justin zhang wrote:
    > 1. Try to see CN52N whether meet your business requirments
    >
    > 2. I use two steps approach investigating material documents for project WBS element:
    >
    >     a.  use IW39 list the work orders by selection criteria of WBS (this is PM order list).
    >     b.  use SAP std. ALV copy functions and past work order numbers into MB51selection criteria
    >
    >
    > I'm interested in std. t-codes if others can provide. Thanks.
    >
    > Edited by: Justin zhang on May 19, 2010 10:17 AM
    Thanks Justin, your IW39 solution worked, as it has posting date selection defined there
    which I cant find in CN52N. My solution was take details from MB51, then pull report IW39 within
    posting dates and then export the WBS elements against work order to excel and then copy
    the WBS elements in the MB51 report created.

  • Work order operation number in Production Scheduling

    Hi,
    We are using production scheduling for scheduling the discrete jobs. In production pegging view, the work order operation is shown in number "xx:xx:xx:xx:xx" not the name of the operation. Is there any setup required to display operation name? Any patch required?
    Thanks,
    Anitha.

    Hi,
    I have face similar issue in deleting PO line items.
    Even though I delete items, system check budget for deleted qty with the currency conversion + value & gives budget exceed error.
    In some cases we have asked user to deactivated AVAC asked to do the transaction, which is not recommended.
    You can try running CJBN & CJBV in sequence for affected WBS.
    Thanks & reg,
    Sam

  • Works on dev, but not production server

    I am building a site using LCCS which works on my laptop, which runs ColdFusion 9 and Apache. But it does not work on my production server, which is ColdFusion 8 and IIS. I have made the various configuration changes and I can successfully create a room via CF from the production server.
    But my Flex app does not seem to load properly on the production server. It is basically a video-conferencing app, so the swf should display the "Start My Camera" button, but it doesn't. It works perfectly on my laptop though.
    I realize I am using very different environments, but I don't know why that would affect anything for the simple Flex-generated swf, especially when I am dynamically creating the room via production.
    I am sure it is something simple, but am out of ideas. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
    cheers,
    Steven

    It seems I figured out my problem (well, about this issue anyway).
    A while back, I un-installed .NET but then had to re-install it. In doing so, somehow IIS lost the ability to recognize .js files. It would return a 404 error whenever you tried to call any file with a .js extension. My hosting company did something to re-associate the file type with IIS. It seems I have the same problem with .swf files.
    fyi, I used Charles (a Firefox plugin) to diagnose this. I had assumed it was a permission issue. It never occurred to me to try to access my swf directly.

  • MRSS issue in work order.

    Hi all,
    i have need your help to solve the below mentioned issue.
    Right now i am doing a sap upgradation. in the part of testing i executed the iw31 tcode. afte entering all the data the i just saved it.
    while saving the order the warning came like" MRSS SAPLRSG_PM_ORDER" .
    can anyone have any idea about it kindly help.
    Siva-V

    Hello
    Please check SAP Note-1350600
    Br
    Rakesh

  • Project system: Budget exceeded issue.

    Dear Sir or Madam,
    This issue is related to project system.  We have overall budget and annual budget.  If annual budget in a year is exhausted is it possible to make the system look at overall budget since there are sufficient funds in overall budget. 
    Thanks
    Joseph

    Hello Joseph,
    Unfortunately not. You may however change the assigned budget profile so that the overall budget is
    checked (transaction OPS9->tab "Availability Control->flag the field "overall") and rebuild availability control of the project in transaction CJBN afterwards.
    But there is definitely no "combination" of both possible.
    Greetings
    Florian

  • Work Order - Maintenance Planning plant change

    Hi Gurus,
    Is there any way to change the maintenance planning plant in a created work order? We are having an issue on work orders and we need to tranfer our open work orders to another plants to solved the issue. Please me let me know if this is possible to do in SAP. And let me know how to do it in SAP.
    Thanks in advance,

    Hi,
    The start of the plan is not option as this will surely have an impact. Anyway, work around for this issue was provided and this is OK now. We will continue with the old orders untill such time they will finally be closed. No postings will be created against this old orders and if there's a need to do GR new orders will be created in new plants for the postings.
    Thanks for you help,

  • Best practice - over issue of move orders in WIP

    Hi Business analyst guru's,
    I am working for a electronics manufacturing industry. I am trying to use work orders functionality across our organizations. I am stuck with a logic. Please advise me what you do in this scenario.
    BoM : I have a a board assembly which requires 10 components say one of each component on BoM.
    Setups:
    all component's WIP supply type is push, Supply subinventory blank for all BoM components
    Release backflush components is not enabled in WIP parameters.
    one fine day I want to build 100 board assemblies and created the work order for 100, and released the move order through compoentn pick release form with transaction type as WIP component issue.
    Now the warehouse picker went into warehouse to pick 100 of each component with a move order with 10 lines on it. 2 components are in reels which he can not split the reel and split reel can not be used in production floor (reel size is 1000). He can issue 1000 against on the move order
    Now all the material went into production and build the assembly by 100 units. But two reels are left over with 900 of each. here I can do a WIP component return against the job.
    But expectation is if I want to build another work order (say qty by 100 again) this 900 of two components should be available for the next work order. If I do component pick release, the move order should request only 8 components.
    Is this possible? If not what is the best practice to avoid WIP return transaction and avoid splitting the reel size?
    Thanks
    Veerakumar

    1) If you have these items as Push, you will get a move order line for 100. Therefore, even if you move a whole reel the floor, only 100 will get transacted out of warehouse. Someone will have to manually transact additional 900 to the floor otherwise your inventory accuracy will go for a toss.
    Have you considered making those items pull?
    1) As and when the worker needs reel, he raises a signal. (different ways of doing this - could be Oracle kanban, could be a visual signal, could be a holler - whatever works for you)
    2) You transfer 1000 to the fllor
    3) As and when jobs complete, the 100 units get issued to work order
    4) Whatever is left over (say 800 after the 2 work orders) and not needed is transferred back to warehouse and you do a subinv xfer transaction.
    2) If you can't make them pull, then you will be forced to move the 900 back to warehouse when the first job is done.
    3) If you can't make them pull, you do a component pick release (CPR) for multiple jobs at a time? You can group your pick tickets by destination operation. This way, upon component release, you will have 1 move order line with qty =200. The picker transacts the move order line for 200 and a subinv xfer to WIP for 800.
    4) Here is the best case scenario. Don't know if your floor layout or factory processes will support this.
    You make the items pull on BOM. You have a temporary holding area on the floor (aka supermarket) . When operator needs the item, a visual signal is raised. The supervisor (aka spider) checks the supermarket and brings a reel to the operator. Upon completing the job(s), whatever is left of the reel goes to the supermarket. Once the reel is no more needed for the day (or week or month), you do a subinv xfer from supermarket to warehouse of whatever is left. The components get issued to work order upon completion (of operation/assembly).
    Do the best you can out of this scenario. :)
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • GI Consignment item in work order

    Hi,
    When issue a work order with consignment item, we will need to identify which vendor to select.
    But what should we do if one vendor didn't has sufficient stock on hand?
    Is it possible to select 2nd vendor in one WO issue operation, to avoid another WO makes the GI as unplanned issue status.
    regards,
    Steven

    Hi King Fischer,
    After you have released an Order, if you delete a Component or an Operation with Component and saved. You cannot re-set the deteltion Indicator.
    By going to the path Edit --> Deletions --> On/Off. You can only see deleted entries but cannot re-set the same.
    If you want, please input the line again.
    Also please refer my post on the same previously
    Re-Activation of Deleted Operations / Components in Maintenance Orders
    Regards,
    MLN Prasad

  • Cost Centers for Work Orders

    HI Guru's,
    I have an issue with work orders for our maintenance team. The orders are being settled to the incorrect cost center.  I believe this is happening because they have not been set up correctly.  Please can you tell me if there a way to transfer these into the correct cost center?  and how can I change the set up on these work orders?
    Please can you help.
    Best Regards,
    Yasmeen

    It sounds like you need to change the settlement rule on the work orders so they settle to the correct cost center.  Go to IW32 -> Goto->Settlement rule
    To move previous postings, you can do an CO only reposting using transaction KB11 to move CO postings to the correct cost object.
    Good luck!
    Tammy

  • PR on work order

    Hi gurus,
    Currently the i have set my work order as Collective PR.
    The problem is there are time that the PR was already converted into PO and i input a new non stock item to the work order the system includes it in the old PR number.
    What the business want is when the PR is already converted into PO and a new component was included in the work order this should trigger a new PR number.
    How can i configure this.
    Thank you so much!

    Hi,
    I think that user exits are used for having different Purchasing Doc Types.
    The issue is: Work order does not generate a new PR number if there is an existing PR on the work order. Instead it opens the released PR and adds a line to it.. What the business wants is a new PR number if the old PR number is already converted into PO.
    Thanks!

  • TFS work item store is not connecting in production server using server side event handler code

    Server side plugin code to connect to work item store
    tfs = new TfsTeamProjectCollection(new Uri(tfsUri));
    store = (WorkItemStore)tfs.GetService(typeof(WorkItemStore));
    I used the above code and accessed work item store in my TFS DEV server without username and password. But the same plugin code is not working for the TFS Production server.
    Exception:
    Account name:
    domain\TFSService Detailed Message: : TF30063: You are
    not authorized to access http://localhost:8080/tfs/xx. Exception Message: TF30063: You are not
    authorized to access http://localhost:8080/tfs/xx
    Please guide

    Hi divya,
    From the error message, you might not have the permissions to get the work item store in TFS production server. You can check the permissions on your production server by using
    tfssecurity command in VS command line.
    Please execute tfssecurity /imx “domain\username” /collection:url, for more information about tfssecurity /imx, please refer to:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms400806.aspx 
    If you have the permission, then you can also clean team foundation cache and try again.
    Best regards,

  • Goods return against maintenance work order exceeds goods issue

    Is there a way to prevent returning more quantity (262 movement type done within MB1A) than was issued (261 movement type done within MIGO_GI) against a maintenance work order component?
    Thanks in advance,
    Rick

    Hi,
    Movement Types 261 and 262 works in Planned as well as in Unplanned both ways.
    If you do Goods Issue w.r.t. Maintenance/Work Order (Movement Type - 261) then components and their quantity get defaulted from the reservation created automatically during order creation and system does not allow us to issue more that the quantity in reservation.
    Similarly when you cancel the Goods Issue Document then it hits Movement Type 262 automatically and does not allow to edit the quantity.
    The above two processes are planned ways.
    Now when you want to do extra consumption of components against Maintenance/Work Order then you do not do Goods Issue > Order, instead of this you do Goods Issue > Others and then specify all the necessary details manually (Like; material, quantity, etc...) and enter Maintenance/Work Order as an Account Assignment on which the cost is getting loaded.
    Similarly when you are receiving materials from Maintenance/Work Order using option Goods Receipt > Others then here also there is no control and you can receive any quantity from Maintenance/Work Order since here also Maintenance/Work Order is working as an account assignment not a control document.
    The above two processes are unplanned ways.
    So in short, there is not any control on this movement when it is unplanned.

Maybe you are looking for