Work order via Sub-Inventory level planning

Hello Team,
We want to create work order via Sub-Inventory level planning as standard program 'min-max planning report' is nor creating WIP Jobs at sub-inventory level.
Kindly guide me if this requirement is possible and if so do share your knowledge on it.
Thanks/Suresh

You can only create a Move Order or requisition from Min/Max at the Sub Inventory level. To create a job order it is organization level

Similar Messages

  • The onhand quantity at sub inventory level it is not showing correctly

    For an item the org level quantityt is showing correctly but at sub inventory level it is not showing correctly.
    1)For an item org level the avilablty as below :
                   On Hand / Avail to Reserve / Avail to Transact are
         oRG level          7     7          7
    STAGING           7     7          7
         STORES          0     0          0     
    2) Created an Sales order with quantity 5 ,then STAGING decreased by 5 which is correct.
              the avilablty as below :
                   On Hand / Avail to Reserve / Avail to Transact are
         oRG level          7     7          7
    STAGING           2     2          2
         STORES          0     0          0     
    3) Shipping Transaction not completed,Received 4 into Stores – Staging avail increased by 6 and even STORES also increased by 4 . Here we do not understand why STAGING increased to 6.
         the avilablty as below :
                   On Hand / Avail to Reserve / Avail to Transact are
         oRG level          7     7          7
    STAGING           6     6          6
         STORES          4     4          4     
    4)Ship Transaction Completed sucessfully now the values are showing correctly.
         The avilablty as below :
                   On Hand / Avail to Reserve / Avail to Transact are
         oRG level          7     7          7
    STAGING           2     2          2
         STORES          4     4          4

    Hi Patel,
    You can create a confirmations using CO11N for sub-operations, but you can only confirm hours, not yield quantity. The yield quantity requried to be confirmed in the operation. You can partially or fully confirm sub-operations.
    Enter the order number, sub -operation number all the related data will be displayed execpt greyed quantity fields.
    Can you see the "sub-operation" entry field below "oper./activity" in CO11N ?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ramagiri

  • Hold in sub-inventory level?

    Hello All,
    Can hold apply in sub-inventory level? if not,why? if yes, how?
    Advance thanks for all.
    Vinoth

    Hi Nagamohan,
    Gud work ..
    I have Flash Player presentations of OM cycles.. and there is a message in end of movie that for more presentations pls logon to http://fng.us.oracle.com ...
    Bt when Im trying to access the site it say that this webpage is not available .
    Can u tell me wt is that ..?
    And from where I got the another modules i.e. PO and INV movie slides.
    Waiting
    Warm Regards
    Amit Saroha.

  • How to stop the Job work orders to sub contractor failed to deliver goods?

    Dear friend,
    If  a job work vendor didn't deliver the goods in the stipulated time say 50 days this vendor to be stopped for further job work orders.  Each and every order follow's the abover rule.  How to configure the sap? Manual blocking not required. Automatic blocking is required.
    Regards,
    TS.
    Edited by: tadavarty srinivas on Feb 21, 2008 6:15 AM

    u nee to take help of source list but the thing is then system will not allow you to issue any type of po to this vendor
    to achive this
    stpe1 : activate source list at plant level(as u mentioned it has to be for all the vendors)
    step 2: create a source list for all the material (externaly procured material or sub contracter) 
    step 3:  mark the BLK check box in front of that vendor 
                                    or
    JUST BLOCK THAT PARTICULAR VENDOR USING TCODE XK05

  • User status profiles for work orders and sub-orders

    Hi Experts,
    I have the following question regarding status profiles for SAP PM work orders (but I guess it relates to all user status profiles).
    Customizing
    A status profile is defined for order type "PM_A", which contains an authorization key "OP" for certain user states (to be set by the ordering party)
    Situation
    The ordering party A creates an order of type PM_A for contractor B, and B then creates a sub-order of type PM_A for contractor C
    Problem
    - If I assign the authorization key "OP" only to roles of party A, then party B can't set the user states reserved for the ordering party (correct for the order A->B, but not for the sub-order B->C)
    - If I assign the authorization key "OP" to roles of party A and party B, then B could set certain user states reserved for the ordering party in the order A->B, which is also wrong
    Question
    Is there a way to restrict sub-orders differently than "non-sub-orders", or do I have to create a "sub-order order-type" for each order type, in order to assign them different status profiles and authorization keys?
    Thanks a lot!

    hi
    since you have 3 roles to be assigned to the same order type with different authorization ,it is better you create an seperate order type for sub order and assign the user status with authorization for B and C
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Planning at Sub-Assy Phantom Level - Work order&Sales order FG Level

    Hi everyone,
    I'm searching for a way of setup my SAP to have my MPS loaded at the sub-assy(phantom) level and my work orders/sales orders loaded at the FG assy level.
    Loading the MPS at the sub-assy and exploding requirements to the components are working fine, the issue is that I need to create a work order/sales order on the FG assy level to be able to backflush the components, create FG stock and sell the product. When I create a work order on the FG assy level SAP is adding additional dependent requirements on the raw material level, duplicating the demand some times,I would like to avoid that. Iwanted to keep just dep requirements generated by the FCST loaded under the Phantom Sub-assy level........Do you have any ideas on how to solve this? Thanks

    Hi Dharma,
    I've tested this Strategy but it didn't work for my case........let me try to explain my issue in a different way.
    The way my BOM's are setup today, I have several Halbs(Which are setup as phantoms) that are options to the product I sell, and the customer is sending me forecast under these options only, not on the Ferts. I'm loading my LSF under this halb phantom level and this is demand is exploding to the ZROHS, which is what I want. When the customer wants to buy a product from me, they send me a PO under the FERT level (Each Fert has a different combination of Halbs). In order to backflush my ZROHs I have to create a work order under the FERT level(As the HALB is phantom) and this is generating additional dependent requirements on the ZROH level..........
    One example, if I receive a Forecast for 1000 pcs of the HALB A, I load the LSF on Product A and my raw material will have 1000 pcs as depreq. When I receive an order from the customer, let's say they want to buy 200 pcs(which should be already included on the demand I loaded under the Halb), I create the work order on the Fert level for 200 pcs. If I run the MRP at this moment the system will request me to buy the 1000 pcs already forecasted plus these 200 pcs that I got one order for....
    Hope I could explain better.
    Thanks for the help,
    Douglas

  • Collective Planned orders Scheduling for lower level orders with reference to the Superior order

    Hi All,
    Collective planned order scheduling.
    I have been trying to reschedule the superior planned order and i was expecting the lower level planned orders to reschedule based on the superior planned order.
    My problem is
    when i try to reschedule the superior planned order the system is not rescheduling the lower level planned orders.
    For example if i change the basic finish date of superior planned order as 30/09/2014 and reschedule the planned order it is only scheduling the header planned order and the lower level planned order is not scheduling.
    Could some one tell me why this is not happenning at planned order level.
    As the rescheduling of collective order will work at production order level but for some reason it is not happening at planned order level(as there is no option available to do so).
    Please give your thoughts on this asap.
    Mahee.

    Hello Mahee
    Please observe that your system is working as designed. Planned orders are scheduled independently, even when they are part of a network/collective order. Note 152319 explains the planned order scheduling in detail and it provides the following information:
    * No scheduling of overall networks is executed although a directly manufactured component is assigned.
    Note that no scheduling of the overall network is executed for planned orders. For the components requirements dates are determined. In order to cover them, planned orders are created in the next MRP run. Since the requirements are not managed using the exact time, the results of the planned order scheduling and of a scheduling of the overall network of the converted collective order can differ.
    BR
    Caetano

  • How to change the main work center and  work center of each operation when generating work order by maintenance plan

    Dear experts,
    I face a problem that system get main work center from equipment master data as a default main work center in maintenance plan when creating maintenance plan. however, if main work center in equipment is changed later, the change will not synchronize to related maintenance plan. if work order is generated from maintenance plan, main work order in order is defaulted from maintenance plan instead of updated work center in equipment.
    another problem is that, for those orders generated by maintenance plan, the work centers in  operations is defaulted from task list in maintenance plan. in most case, work center in task list is dummy. Actually the work is done by work center in equipment master data.
    My expectation is how to auto replace the main work center and work center of operations in work order with the one in equipment master data if order is generated by maintenance plan? is there any standard configuration or enhancement/BADi that can help with this requirement?
    thanks！
    Wesley

    Wesley,
    Sorry - development is the only way.
    Another option is to create a batch program that runs before your IP30 run(s) and updates any maintenance items and task lists with the correct work centres.
    PeteA

  • Work Order & Cost Center Commitment Management

    We have a business requirement to be able to view our work order commitments (Reqs and POs) from the work order as well as from the cost center assigned to the work order via a settlement rule. Our business users do not like the work order collecting all of the costs instead of the cost center where they perform their cost controlling.
    The actuals will settle to the cost center eventually but without the commitments they have no way of planning for future costs. Commitments management is activated for both the cost centers and work orders involved. I am open to any suggestions on how to achive this requirement. Thanks!

    Any thoughts?

  • I am unable to save a service work order designated and configured as MRS work order

    Every time I try to create a SM work order, and save it, I get the following message"
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
        The current ABAP program "/MRSS/SAPLRSG_PM_ORDER" had to be terminat
         it has
        come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
        In include "/MRSS/LRSG_PMCS_APPSCHEDF02 ", in line 93 of
    "/MRSS/SAPLRSG_PMCS_APPSCHED             ", the following syntax er
        have occurred:
        The row type of the table "G_APPOINTMENT_LIST" is not compatible wit
        field symbol type "<APPOINTMENT_LIST>".
        Author and last person to change the include are:
        Author         SAP
        Last changed by "SAP         "
    Any help or advise that would allow me to successfully create the work order and then open the planning board to view both the demand and the resources? I would appreciate any help. Thanks

    Hi Hussein,
    I found a SAP note 2030049 that is relevant to the problem: http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2030049
    But when attempting to implement the note, it showed a syntax error.
    Will likely log this with SAP for resolution.
    Regards, Warren

  • Error while creating Work Order

    Hello Experts,
    I am getting below error while creating work order via add-on named beas but the error seems to coming from SBO.
    Please advise.
    Thanks
    Deepak

    Hi,
    Plz check this thread:
    What does this error mean?

  • IW21 Retrieving the maintenance cycle text while creation of work order

    Hi Experts,
    My requirement is to display the maintenance cycle text on the print preview while creating a work order via transaction IW21.
    Since the print preview is clicked before saving the work order, the data from the work order has not been updated in the database tables (AFVC, PLWP).
    Hence, the maintenance cycle text will have to be accessed through a runtime structure.
    The text has to be fetched in a subroutine program which is called from the SAPscript.
    I tried accessing the global data while debugging. However, the maintenance cycle text does not seem to be present.
    Please help.
    Regards,
    Anusha

    It is inappropriate to produce a SAPScript prior to save, IMHO.  What prevents the user from changing something after the print preview was done in this case?
    At any rate, you'll find that some data values, like document numbers, etc., are not set until the user has saved the document.   The document needs to be saved, and SAPScript generated at the end of that process.

  • ESTF Requisitions generated from Work Orders (IW31)

    I am generating purchase requisitions from work orders via IW31. I can edit field selection key ESTF to open certain fields for editing in transaction ME52N.
    However if I generate a service requisition the service line item fields are not available in field selection key ESTF. Where can I allow the service fields to be edited for requisitions generated from work orders. What field selection key should I update?
    Any guidence or ideas would be greatly appreciated.

    ML90 - IW31 controls what fields are available for change in the work order transaction IW31. It does not control what fields are available from ME52N. The issue face is that our maintenance staff are creating purchase requisitions from work orders. Purchasing then needs to be able to adjust the pricing on the service lines in the requisition, however since these originated from a work order the fields are unavailable for input.
    We were able to get around this issue by editing field selection key ESTF in the requisition screen layout config. This works for material purchase requisitions but not services. I am looking for an extension of ESTF in transaction ML90 if that makes sense. Any guidence you could provide would be appreciated.

  • Changing Profit Centre in IW32 of a Work Order

    Hi Gurus,
    I am trying to change a Profit centre in a Work Order  via IW32 as Profit Centre is greyed out.I know it has to done via changing the Functional Location.But although i have changed Function Location still Profit Centre remains unchanged..
    Is there any way to change Profit Centres in WOs?
    Also please let me know are there restrictions on WOs status for changing Profit centres?
    please help me its very urgent.....

    hi
    The system proposes the profit center in the cost center belonging to the responsible work center. You can overwrite this, however.
    If you change the responsible work center in the order, the system does not automatically overwrite the profit center on the additional data header screen. If required, change this manually.
    You can change the profit center in the order, provided that no actual data exists for the order yet
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Estimated Costs are Zero in PM03 work orders

    Hi experts,
    I had an issue in PM03 (Preventive Maintenance ) work orders.
    While Work orders kicks out from the plan work orders are creating with REL status. And here i can see the Estimated costs as Zero in costs Tab of the work order.
    Please suggest if anything is missing from config end or how to proceed on this.
    Br,
    Sandeep

    Hi Sandeep,
    There are some threads available to get the plan cost copied to Estimated cost.
    Estimated Cost & Planned Cost : Maintenance Order  SAP PM
    Use below to maintain value categories.
    Plant Maintenance and Customer Service - Maintenance and Service Processing - Basis Settings - Setting for Display of Cost
    You can explorer certain things those OSS notes, some notes are released for updating estimated cost. So refer it.
    I have not worked on this, so you need to think about updating estimated cost when the plan is generating the order and before releasing it, whether this can gets updated.
    Regards
    Terence

Maybe you are looking for