WM problem - material is locked in 922 TR-ZONE

Dear All,
We are facing a problem.
There were MB1B 344 booking and their WM counterpart wasn't executed well. The result that we had stock in 922 TR-ZONE (example):
922 TR-ZONE
materialA 'blocked' 10 pc
materialA 'free' -10 pcs (free means stock for unrestricted use)
WH (location in WH)
materialA 'free' 1000 pcs
I wanted to move 10 pcs 'free' to 922 TR-ZONE. In the first step I moved 5 pcs of them:
922 TR-ZONE
materialA 'blocked' 10 pc
materialA 'free' -5 pcs (free means stock of unrestricted use)
WH (location in WH)
materialA 'free' 995 pcs
But after that I'm not able to move 'free' stock to 922 TR-ZONE any more because the material is locked in 922 (I can see it in LT10). (confirmations are OK)
(I can move the 'blocked' stock from 922 TR-ZONE)
There was problem with materilB also and similar bookings were carried out and the remaining minus 'free' quantity in 922 TR-ZONE became locked too.
What is the reason? How can we solve this?
Please help in this issue.
Thanks,
Csaba

Dear Jürgen,
Thanks for your help.
I think you are right:
1. Quality guys should have do MB1B 344 counterpart in WM
2. I shouldn't have posted stock to 922 TR-ZONE and I sohould have used LU04.
I think if I had moved from normal bin the whole qty to 922 TR-ZONE to eliminate the whole negative stock at once I would have succeeded.
I guess the problem is because I just partially eliminated the negative stock in 922 - that is why the remaining qty is locked.
I don't know exactly why it is so, but the situation is that this problem do exist and I have to solve it somehow.
(my idea was to eliminate the negative 922 qty and after that move the blocked qty from 922 to its destination).
What can I do now?
thx
Csaba

Similar Messages

While assigning batch material get locked in different plant.

Dear Guru,
After implementation ,frequently facing problem, In CO02 we are assigning the batch manually to the material but one material is configured with valuation type domestic / import. while assinging the bacth to the material system showes to another user who iis entering the same material in different plant is xxxx user is locked the material so u cant assign the batch, but batch we are maintiaining in material level. (batch maintianed in material level.)
currently we are going in sm12 transcationa and removing the lock, but we want to know why it is happening. what is the root cause for the error.
Please advice.
Thx
Nara

HI
It is Standard SAP at a time same material or its masters cannot be used by multiple users ids or with same user id also
system gives error material is locked.You can unlock it thru SM12 but be careful while soing so some the data which the another user using may be or may not be lost.
the better way is to ask the user to come out of that material or release it after doing his work
Regards
Anupam Sharma

TS3920 I have a problem after I lock my iphone or it is automatically locked , the time doesn't update. It just freezes at the last time of locking. Please help , it is iphone 5 running iOS7.1

I have a problem after I lock my iphone or it is automatically locked , the time doesn't update. It just freezes at the last time of locking. Please help , it is iphone 5 running iOS7.1
I check with my service provider as well as I synchronized with iTunes , changed time manually with the right time zone. Unfortunately the problem keeps showing

Hi Courcoul
Thanks for stepping by
To tell the truth I forgot to mention that I already did what you said, even more I tried all "reset" options including:
Reset all settings
Erase All content and settings
Reset Network settings
Etc
Even
Reset location and Privacy
It keeps showing the problem

TS1702 I had this Scrabble on my iPad2 and began to have connection problems, it would lock in the "connecting" position. This is not the first time Scrabble has had problems with interface. Typically customers delete the Ap then download it again to rein

I have contacted EA about this and can find no help. I had this Scrabble on my iPad2 and began to have connection problems, it would lock in the "connecting" position. This is not the first time Scrabble has had problems with interface. Typically customers delete the Ap then download it again to reinstall it. During the process you sign in and approve the purchase KNOWING that another window will open saying that you have previously purchased it and that there is no charge. So what happened this time? It will not connect and all of my saved and current games are wiped out. I want my money back, this game interface is pretty junk and operates like some ancient DOS program,,bug,bug,buggy. I want my money back.

Go here:
http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/
and follow the instructions to report the issue to the iTunes Store.
Regards.

Material master lock authorization

Hi,
I would use the button lock material to lock fields of a material in material master.
Do you know what are authorization for this so that I can assign it only to some users?
Best regards

Hi All,
I have made a copy of the role SAP_ISR_MATERIAL_DISPLAY and I have changed some setting in order to hide some views of the Material Master for the user. It has worked finally but doing this the user doesn't have authorization for other Transactions Code of WM like LS24, LT*, etc... So, I guess, I have to merge some roles and/or authorizations or I have to create an own role to pack everything I want for this user. Anyway, this is another issue...
Thank you very much for your help, your answers have been very useful.
Best Regards,
David

Problem related to locking the table

Hi all,
i am facing a problem while applying locks on the oracle table.my intention is stop the accessing of table to other users, if the table is locked by one user.
for this i wrote the code as follows
Class.forName("oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver"); con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:oracle:thin:@192.168.2.123:1521:xe", "root", "paridb"); con.setAutoCommit(false); System.out.println("Successfully connected to " + "Oracle server using TCP/IP..."); String lock="lock table report@xe in exclusive mode";-------------------------------------->1 query to lock the table Statement stmt1=con.createStatement(); stmt1.executeUpdate(lock); System.out.println("lock is applied"); Statement stmt=con.createStatement(); for(int i=0;i<6;i++) { sql="insert into report values(1921682123,'device','host')"; stmt.executeUpdate(sql); }
after locking i inserted some data into table, after insertion i am not commiting it because if i commit,the lock will be release.next i am trying to insert data into that table from another system,acutually the data don't insert.but data is inserted. how it is happening like that ??
in another scenario, if execute the locking query on the database directly then trying to insert into database through java application, at that time it is not giving permission to access table.
plz guide me
thanks&regards,
nagaraju

Hi! Thank you so much for your reply. Yes, I´m using ADF. I attach you the iterator´definition from the page definition:
<iterator id="MovimientosCtbView3Iterator" RangeSize="10"
Binds="MovimientosCtbView3" DataControl="AppModuleDataControl"/>
If I set the RangeSize to 11, the problem is solved, but my project manager want to find out why this situation happens with RangeSize=10.
Thank you so much and sorry for bothering you

ALE-IDOC ISSUE(material getting locked for enhancement)

Dear all,
I have extended the idoc and enhanced inbound material master function module to suite the requirement .
The challenge is that the material is getting locked when the material sent from bd10 and prodction version view for which function module extended is not getting created.The error log says that "material is locked".But when the idoc is processed again from we19 the material is not getting locked and PV(production version is successfully created).
Can anybody guide me how this locking issue can be resolved?(have done unlock -lock before and after BDC for Production version).
Thanks.

Hi,
If some one using the same material in another session, definitely the idoc will fail as the material is locked... In order to overcome this first lock the material u want to send, if doing this u get foreign lock then u will know that already someone locked it , so once gain process the same record until the foreign lock is gone, once it is gone process ur record and then unlock the material.
Regards,
Nagaraj

How to avoid: Material data locked by another user

Hi,
'Material data locked by another user'
We want to avoid this kind of situation so that two different users can do the transactions on same material at same time.
Regards,

hi,
As per SAP std. configuration its not possible...And if we the reason...then it good for a user...
so, that once the user 1's work is not done fully user 2 can't work untill then and by this we avoid making of extra GR/IR or any of the duplicate documents...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Problem with exporting devices to non-global zone

Hi,
I've problem with exporting devices to my solaris zones (i try do add support to mount /dev/lofi/* in my non-global zone).
A create cfg for my zone.
Here it is:
$ zonecfg -z sapdev info
zonename: sapdev
zonepath: /export/home/zones/sapdev
brand: native
autoboot: true
bootargs:
pool:
limitpriv: default,sys_time
scheduling-class:
ip-type: shared
fs:
dir: /sap
special: /dev/dsk/c1t44d0s0
raw: /dev/rdsk/c1t44d0s0
type: ufs
options: []
net:
address: 194.29.128.45
physical: ce0
device
match: /dev/lofi/1
device
match: /dev/rlofi/1
device
match: /dev/lofi/2
device
match: /dev/rlofi/2
attr:
name: comment
type: string
value: "This is SAP developement zone"
global# lofiadm
Block Device File
/dev/lofi/1 /root/SAP_DB2_9_LUW.iso
/dev/lofi/2 /usr/tmp/fsfile
I reboot the non-global zone, even reboot global-zone, and after that, in sapdev zone, there is no /dev/*lofi/* files.
What i do wrong? Maybe I reduce my sol 10 u4 sparc instalation too much.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks for help,
Marek

I experienced the same problem on my system Sol 10 08/07.
Normally, when the zone enters the READY state during boot, it's zoneadmd will run devfsadm -z <zone>. In my understanding this is to create the necessary device files in ZONEPATH/dev.
This worked well until recently. Now only the directories are still created.
It seems as if devfsadm -z is broken. Somebody should issue a call to sun.
As a workaround you can easily copy the device files into the zone. It is important not to copy the symbolic link but the target.
# cp /dev/lofi/1 ZONEPATH/dev/lofi
Hope this helps,
Konstantin Gremliza

Material(Article) locked after change

Hi All,
When i change any material (Article ) master through Tcode MM42 its getting locked forever. I am not able to edit the same material again, its giving me "The group data for the article 900000004 is locked by XYZ"
This problem is only in specific development client but in Qulaity server its working fine.
Regards,

Hello,
I can not tell you without connecting why it´s not working in both system. I would therefore advice you to open a ticket in the SAP Marketplace, so that someone can have a look at your system.
Best Regards,
Arminda

Problem with file locked by another user

I have a problem with a user on Windows 7 in my network when accessing a single .xlsx file. When Jane Smith opens said file, she gets a message that the file is locked by Jane Smith but she has checked and it was in use by another user, Roger Smith.
This happened over a weeks time and is not a one-off situation. Researching online, I tried one suggestion by going to Roger Smith's computer and into the registry under HKEY CURRENT USER, navigated to "Software\Microsoft\Office\15.0\Common\UserInfo",
expecting to see Jane Smiths name and initials. Nope, that wasn't the problem. I went ahead and deleted extra profiles on the computer and ran a repair on Roger Smiths Office 2013.
It was okay for a half a day then towards the end of the day, Jane Smith calls back to say again the same file is locked by Jane Smith yet this time Diana Smith had the file open.
So, the file is locked but why is Excel not reporting the correct user? What can I do to address this?

These all reference Office 2007 and 2010. As far as you know, all of these fixes still apply to Office 2013?
example: they give two updates to download.
Excel 2007 - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2598133
Excel 2010 - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2598143
No option for 2013.
but this could be useful no matter the version.
In the Shared folder or the File Server;
Open the folder where the Document is located.
Click Tools=>Folder Options
Click the View tab
Scoll down to Advanced Settings>Hidden files and folders
Select Show hidden files and folders and Unselect Hide protected operating system files
Look for a temp lock file and delete it. It should look something like
~$filename.xlsx or whatever file extension the it was saved in.
(In my case, this file had become corrupt and was stuck displaying an earlier modify date from a few days ago..)

Problems with CS4 Locking up after File I/O

I am running:
Vista Ultimate Service Pack 2
Photoshop CS4 with the opengl off
Problem: When I either create a new file or open an already established file the program becomes unresponsive. It locks and hangs. I have read through and tried the KB article that I was giving by support. I have not been able to figure out what is going on. As far as I can tell all of the services that should be running are. Is this a permissions issue with the OS? Just don't know. Please help if you can.
Thanks,

You can right click on the .exe file and choose properties, then compatibility, and select run as administrator.
Also try the ole fix all reset the prefs in this attachment:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/375776?tstart=0

64-bit, 32-bit Porting - Problem with file locking

Hi,
OS: Solaris 8
I am trying to port the existing 32-bit code to 64-bit. I am facing the following problem.
The executable works fine with 32-bit compilation, but fails with the 64-bit compilation. I am trying to lock a file, but it is failing with the errno = 9 [Bad file descriptor]
I have included the code. I would appreciate if some one can help me to solve this.
Many Thanks and Regards,
Srini
Please find below the compilation flags i used.
32-bit compilation:
cc -KPIC -Xa -mt -o coreflck coreflck.c
When i run the exe then the result is:
$coreflck
Done!!!!
64-bit compilation:
cc -KPIC -Xa -mt -xarch=v9 -o coreflck coreflck.c
When i run the exe then the result is:
$ coreflck
Error Occurred while locking errno:9
Done!!!!
Please find below the code (coreflck.c)
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/errno.h>
#include <malloc.h>
extern int errno;
int lock(
int fd,
int cmd,
struct flock *lcks
int op = 0;
int sts;
do {
sts = fcntl (fd, cmd, lcks);
} while (sts == -1 && errno == EINTR);
return sts;
int main ()
struct flock lock_struct;
int mode, junk = 0;
FILE *fp;
fp = fopen("/krb5/tmp/cc/krb5cc_1024", "rb");
memset( &lock_struct, 0, sizeof( lock_struct ));
lock_struct.l_type = F_WRLCK;
lock_struct.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
do {
mode = fcntl (fileno( fp ), F_GETFL, junk);
} while (mode == -1 && errno == EINTR);
if (mode == -1 )
printf("Error Occurred errno:%d\n",errno);
else {
/* If the file's mode is read-only then we
try for a shared lock; Otherwise, we
try for an exclusive lock. */
if( mode == O_RDONLY )
lock_struct.l_type = F_RDLCK;
if( lock( fileno( fp ), F_SETLKW, &lock_struct ) == -1 )
printf("Error Occurred while locking errno:%d\n", errno);
printf("Done!!!!\r\n");

I found the solution
I changed the line
if( mode == O_RDONLY )
to
if( (mode & O_ACCMODE) == O_RDONLY )
Since, if we use
F_GETFL
Get the file status flags and file access modes, defined in <fcntl.h>, for the file description associated with fildes. The file access modes can be extracted from the return value using the mask O_ACCMODE, which is defined in <fcntl.h>. File status flags and file access modes are associated with the file description and do not affect other file descriptors that refer to the same file with different open file descriptions.
Cheers,
Srini

N8 problem with side lock key

Hi,
Did anyone find any problem with N8 side locking key. Mine one has to be slided really hard to get it locked and unlocked, the mechanism is not as smooth as in the earlier phones.
Trying to wrap people in the cocoon of seamless connectivity during their mobility.

I also have this problem after installing version 5.0.0.508. It appears that I no longer have an option for locking the keyboard. When I select Options/Screen/Keyboard and select Left Side Convienence Key Options it does not show up in the list of selectable options.

Problem in setting locked song as ringtone in Noki...

I have had X6 for about a week now, previous phone was Nokia 1100. Now I am having a problem setting songs as ring tones.Now I just cant seem to do this with My new Nokia X6 as far as I can tell you have to go via settings...Personal...Profiles...Options...Personalise.. Ringing Tone. Also I have downloaded songs via Nokia and I can't seem to use those as a set ring tone. It says thay are locked... Wat to do?? Somebody help me!!!! ....
Solved!
Go to Solution.

If they are WMA files then you can't use them as ringtones, this is nothing to do with Nokia - it is a decision of the record companies who decided top license the tracks music playback only, not tones - it is the DRM (Digitial Rights Management) preventing the track being used as a tone.
Furthermore, if you have downloaded free using the Ovi Music Unlimited service the DRM is even tighter, restricting the tracks to being played on a single phone and a single PC registered to the OMU service. There is no such thing as a free lunch, not without heavy strings attached, anyway.
If you buy MP3 files from the paid Ovi Music Store, these have no DRM and can be used as tones.

WM problem - material is locked in 922 TR-ZONE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for