WNR2000v4 issues public ip addresses

Hi all,
I would like to know if it's possibile to filter inbound traffic from remote to LAN based on macaddress. I would like to prevent a series of...

Hello
I am wanting to use the USBshare on the DGN2200v4 as a backup location for Windows8.1 and maybe Winserver2012. according to TechNet to do this...

Similar Messages

Verizon 4G LTE Broadband Router - Does Verizon Issue You With A Public IP Address?

Hi,
http://www.verizonwireless.com/home-office-solutions/4g-lte-broadband-router-with-voice/
Regarding the above Verizon 4G LTE Broadband Router, does Verizon issue you with a public IP address that can be accessed from outside of their network or do they issue you with a private IP addresss just like they do with their JetPacks?
Thank you!

That's an excellent question olimits7! It will be my pleasure to assist with your inquiry. Our voice and data services are transmitted using a 10-digit mobile number on our network. May I ask do you have the mobile number on your account? If you are interested in a private IP address then we can discuss options. Please advise so we can begin.
Thank you…
ArnettH_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Public ip address can't be used locally to access hosted websites

I have snow leopard server and I have successfully set up the server to be accessible via a public static ip address. Im hosting some test websites, and cannot access those sites locally using the public ip address, only using the private ip address. However, externally, I can access the sites using the public ip address.
In other words, while I'm at the office, I can only view the sites using the private ip address and not the public ip address. However, while I'm at home I can see the sites using the public ip address.
Why can't I access the public ip address locally?
I'm new to os x server ... New to any kind of server for that matter, so please keep explanations simple.
I'm at a serviced office, and the router here is not mine and I have no control over it. Some IT company manages it for the site, and they weren't very helpful. The basically told me there's nothing they can do and blamed Mac os x server - since they could just wash their hands of the matter since they don't deal with macs.
I was told by someone else, that this is common issue with some routers and that they could fix the issue on their end, but don't want to do it for what ever reason.
I could simply access the sites using the private ip address, but I'd rather use the public one as this is currently causing issues with some of the software we're using.
Any ideas how to resolve this?

The IT company (shock, horror) apparently doesn't understand IP routing, or didn't understand what you were asking. This case has nothing to do with Mac OS X nor Mac OS X Server, and everything to do with the capabilities of the gateway box.
I'm here going to refer to the firewall / gateway / router / DHCP server / box at the edge of your network as a gateway, because I really don't want to type all that stuff each time I describe this box. Your particular box might or might not be capable of all that.
Why? Likely because your particular gateway device is not capable of detecting and reflecting the connections back toward the target server.
IP routing. In small words.
If an IP address is within a range of IP addresses designated by the subnet mask, the packet goes directly to the target host.
If an IP address is not within that range, the packet is sent to the gateway.
The gateway will then send the packet to the next router on the way to the target. With a typical low cost firewall gateway box, that next router is likely the ISP's routers. With a somewhat higher-end box and with a smarter router within the gateway, the packets can go to other IP routers.
If the gateway is implemented for it, the gateway router's own address(es) will be recognized, and reflected back inwards. That means the address is public IP address on the way out, and is NAT'd when reflected, and sent back at the target host via whatever local processing rules or local port-forwarding rules might be defined and present within the gateway box.
Now what usually happens here ([once you get the hang of setting up DNS services|http://labs.hoffmanlabs.com/node/1436]) is called split-horizon DNS, and that's where your public DNS domain is also mostly-duplicated as one of the domains on your LAN and thus reachable in your LAN domain, and your local DNS server in your Mac OS X Server is then configured to return a private IP address (and one within the range of addresses defined by your IP subnet mask), and which entirely bypasses your gateway and allows the packet to go directly to the target box. Put another way, with split-horizon DNS, you insinuate your LAN DNS server into the network and configure it to pass out (or spoof) IP name-to-address translations for your public DNS names, and pass out local (direct, LAN, private) IP addresses.
The other option is to see if the IT company can switch the gateway box into what's usually called "bridged" mode, or swap in a box that acts as a bridge and not a router, and to install your own gateway behind it. Not all boxes permit that, but some do.

Netopia 4686XL USA Public IP address to Linksys WRTU54G-TM for Netflix USA IP

I have a stack of public IPs on my Ethernet router Netopia 4686XL which is on a T1 connection in USA, I have multiple Linksys routers model WRTU54G-TM(T-Mobile @Home Router) Which I use as router at various locations other than my office. I would like to get an Public IP from my office Ethernet router(Primary router on a Static IP with T1 Speed) to get one of the public IP address on my Netfilx device through Linksys router which is at remote location with various ISPs(Cable vision, Optimum online, Verizon FIOS, Vidiotron.ca CANADA, Airtel INDIA, BSNL INDIA, And more) where I have Basic internet service. I want to get the USA IP address from my office Location so i can overcome the issue of Netflix. There is the Advance routing in Linksys router (»192.168.1.1/Advanced-Routing-Router.htm) Where I should be able to point the the public IP using static ip routing but do not know how to configure. I have setup static address on Linksys client so the device will always be on the Private address 192.168.1.100. Step by Step directions will be helpful due to many hours of research without any success.

Nick0618 wrote:
I have a stack of public IPs on my Ethernet router Netopia 4686XL which is on a T1 connection in USA, I have multiple Linksys routers model WRTU54G-TM(T-Mobile @Home Router) Which I use as router at various locations other than my office. I would like to get an Public IP from my office Ethernet router(Primary router on a Static IP with T1 Speed) to get one of the public IP address on my Netfilx device through Linksys router which is at remote location with various ISPs(Cable vision, Optimum online, Verizon FIOS, Vidiotron.ca CANADA, Airtel INDIA, BSNL INDIA, And more) where I have Basic internet service. I want to get the USA IP address from my office Location so i can overcome the issue of Netflix. There is the Advance routing in Linksys router (»192.168.1.1/Advanced-Routing-Router.htm) Where I should be able to point the the public IP using static ip routing but do not know how to configure. I have setup static address on Linksys client so the device will always be on the Private address 192.168.1.100. Step by Step directions will be helpful due to many hours of research without any success.
Hi there. Static Routing is actually possible but only through a local network. May I ask, what is the issue you are having by the way with Netflix?

BPF Package Manager won't open in remote connection using Public IP address

I have a problem to open BPF package manager.
Im able to open bpf package manager in my server and to all local bpc users but on the remote connection (vpn/web) they couldn't open the bpf.
Our server uses an private Ip address which is 10.1.25.81 (local LAN) but we also access BPC remotely using an
Public IP address (202.129.238.46 or http://servername.example.com/osft ) using a configuration of IP Forwarding in our router.
example:
(LAN)
User 1 on System 1 - does the BPF work?yes
User 1 on System 2 - does the BPF work?yes
User 2 on System 1 - does the BPF work?yes
User 2 on System 2 - does the BPF work?yes
(WAN/VPN)
User 1 on System 1 - does the BPF work?no
User 1 on System 2 - does the BPF work?no
User 2 on System 1 - does the BPF work?no
User 2 on System 2 - does the BPF work?no

When you are performing installation of BPC or after if you are looking into Server Manager - Server Option you will see for application server, web server and reporting services server you have two fields where you can specify name for internal and nae Example for application server:
Application Server name: FQDN (or IP)
External Application Name: FQDN (or IP)
Normally we recommedn to use FQDN (Fully qualified DNS name)
because if the DNS entry are set correct then you will be able to connect from internal and also from external without any problem.
The system will provide every time the correct IP.
In my opinion you used IP and the problem it is that internal the external IP is not recognized.
Please verify the configuration and provide more information about the landscape.
Only in this way we will be able to provide you the right sugestions to fix this issue.
Kind Regards
Sorin Radulescu

Can't access webacc on server public ip address

This is new server with a fresh SLES11sp2 OES11sp1 install with GW2012 sp2.
All is working well except even a local workstation cannot access webacc using the server public ip. Server is behind a router. Makes no difference if firewalls are on or off. Same issue from a remote workstation on another network, i.e., cannot connect to webacc using the test server's public ip from a browser. Just one nic in the server and one private ip.
FYI, same issue exists for imanager, i.e., no public ip address access even from a local workstation, so I am thinking it may be a SLES network card configuration issue, but that's just because I seem to remember under Netware 6.5 I had to make some inetcfg configurations to relay through the router. Router is an older Linksys WRT610N as this is just a test system for the time being.
I started an SR and they couldn't suggest any fixes other than to tinker with the router. I have both the to default values and open in the router's port forwarding section.
Ideas? Including switching to a newer router (I'm trying to keep it under $300.00) if you have any suggestions. This server will be for no more than 10 workstations local (mixed wireless and wired) and/or remote workstations for very trusted users.
Help Mr. Wizard!!!
thanks.
johnb

On 10/04/2013 16:26, jbeuhler wrote:
> The sp2 is not a typo. I had a SR with a GW2012 sp1 problem during
> install, encountering a "line173 error" involving a python subdirectory,
> even using the --text switch. The engineer (the SR went up) gave me the
> link to try sp2. It installed okay, still a little glitch but I figured
> out how to get around the line 173 error by installing all of the GW
> products one after another without configuring in between product
> installs and then going back to do the product configurations, instead
> of install, configure, etc for each product. The SR said the line 173
> install error is a known error but not currently under review for a
> fix.
>
> If you would pass this post on the beta reporting or send me that
> direction I would appreciate it.
>
>
> I am assuming from your response that my problem is not a recognized
> problem?
I wouldn't assume that but since you're running software that's not
publicly released I'd go back to your SR/contact with this issue.
HTH.
Simon
Novell Knowledge Partner
Do you work with Novell technologies at a university, college or school?
If so, your campus could benefit from joining the Technology Transfer
Partner (TTP) program. See novell.com/ttp for more details.

Setting up AirPort Extreme, share public ip address

Hi there.
I have a problem with my AirPort Extreme, which is an older model (serial: 6F7040BGVYS, Version: 7.6.3)
It's connected to my Netgear router, and it works fine. BUT when another user goes on my wifi connection, the speed goes down seriously!
I contacted my internet provider, and they told me that it was a setting in the AirPort - something about sharing public ip address..? Changing Network > Router Mode from Off (Bridge Mode) to DHCP only. When I type in the DHCP Range, it will not accept, see alert below. I tried many different, so there must be somewhere else to configure..?
Invalid Value
Sharing a range of IP addresses using DHCP Only requires manually configuring your WAN IP address. If your ISP gives you a range of static IP addresses, you should manually configure your base station with the first IP address and distribute the rest via DHCP.
How do I setup my AirPort to share public ip?
Attached photo shows the AirPort Utility, and version.
Hope someone knows about this issue
Have a nice weekend!
Best from Jeppe

Hi..
I have this same question.
Yes i did change all those and have tried with all the possible settings.
Still the problem persists..It shows all the configuration and all is right and still it is not connecting to internet.
Cross checked with the ISP, Tried same configuration in the mac machine(It's working) everything else seems to be fine but only the Airport is not connecting to the Internet.
Any solution or clarification will be appreciated.
Thanks in Advance.

Public IP Address

Our son does online gaming with his new XboxOne and is reporting that due to "restricted" somethings he cannot connect and play with many of his friends due an "NAT" issue--apparently something new for those using the XboxOne. He says teh settings need to be either set to "moderate" or to "open". I do not fully understand the issue here, so trying my best to describe what he is telling us. He has asked whether we can have a public IP address instead of, or in addition to, our private IP address. I am not sure what this all means and what the security implications are of these settings. Can someone explain and guide me on this so I can make an informed and wise decision?

NAT-Open, Restricted and Moderate are XBOX-coined terms meaning that the XBOX has determined it is behind a Network Address Translating router. "Restricted" imply that the router does not support UPnP and blocks unsolicited incomming traffic. "Open" means that the router supports UPnP. "Moderate" means that it doesn't support UPnP but port forwarding has been put in the firewall to allow it to operate.
The U-verse RG is a NAT router and doesn't support UPnP. The most straightforward solution to your issue is to acquire a third party router that does support UPnP from BestBuy, etc. and install it behind your RG, configure the RG to put it in DMZplus or IP Passthrough mode, and let that take care of it. There are articles around on these forums around on that if you use SEARCH. The above will get you NAT-Open.
If NAT-Moderate is good enough, and you only have one XBOX that you want to connect to the Internet at the same time, you can just set up Port Forwarding. There are articles you can search the forums for to do that as well. If you have two Xboxen that you want to connect, then you either need to go the UPnP route, OR you'll have to purchase a block of additional public IP addresses. Which is way more complicated that you want to deal with and will cost you more each month.
Note that UPnP is a bit of a security hole, because it means things behind your firewall can open holes in your firewall without your knowledge or approval. Which is exactly what it's designed to do.

Public IP address requirerement for a Public facing SharePoint 2013 website.

I am planning to implement a public facing website on SharePoint 2013 platform. Following are the proposed server setup.
2 x Web Front End (WFE) hosting SharePoint 2013 (Load Balanced)
2 x Search and Application server hosting SharePoint 2013 (Load Balanced)
2 x Application Server (non-SharePoint with separate .NET web applications linked through SharePoint site)
2 x SQL 2012 Servers (Clustered with two instances for SharePoint and .NET applications)
I understand that SQL servers will not require a public IP. What about other servers? Also, there is no tight integration between the Application (# 3) and SharePoint servers. It is just a hyperlink provided on the WFE website. In
this scenario, do we need public IPs for # 2 and 3?
Thanks in advance!
LM

Hi,
In your scenario, if your Application servers run apps that need to be accessed from the Internet, these need to be published as well. Your Search And Application hosting SharePoint 2013 (SharePoint app servers) don't need to be connected to the internet.
So all in all, make sure you publish your WFE's (using your load-balancer IP) and your Application (Non-SharePoint, through load-balancer).
The best way to do this is using a reverse proxy to publish your SharePoint and application servers. This means you only need 1 public IP address in this scenario.
If you need more guidance, let us know.
Nico Martens
SharePoint/Office365/Azure Consultant

Create public facing web site of SharePoint intranet portal with Public IP Address

Hi,
I did below steps to create public facing URL and to access outside domain network (Internet).
1. Got a public IP Address.
2. Created an extending web application to existing Web Application (default zone - intranet) and Zone selected to Internet and host header given test.contoso.com.
3. Went to IIS and edit binding of Internet site. Provided public IP Address in 'IP Address' textbox and given host name as test.contoso.com.
Above are the 3 steps used to get access http://test.contoso.com in internet. But unable to access it and not seen any relavant message.
Please help me and provide me steps to achieve.

Did you actually register the contoso.com address on the Internet? And is it associated with the public IP Address? To access SharePoint from the Internet you are going to use http://test.contoso.com. The Internet DNS servers need to be
able to resolve that to your Public IP in order to find the SharePoint server.
Second, did you bind your external IP address to one of the network cards on your SharePoint server? Or is your Firewall or other gateway device forwarding traffic to the SharePoint server at that address?
Another problem you may have is whether that Internet IP address is even reachable on your internal network from the Internet. Most companies have Firewalls inplace to keep external users from accessing addresses inside your network.
It sounds like you've done all the SharePoint configuration correctly, but you also need to make sure that TCP/IP is correctly configured.
Paul Stork SharePoint Server MVP
Principal Architect: Blue Chip Consulting Group
Blog: http://dontpapanic.com/blog
Twitter: Follow @pstork
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves your problem.

I have an issue with the address browser in mail in Yosemite

I am using IOS 10.10.1 now on an iMac and have discovered an issue with the address browser in mail.
Previously in my pending to send email toolbar there was a contacts icon which I clicked on to display my contacts list. I could hold down the Command button and select as many contacts I wanted (often up to 100), then select the field to send (to, ccc, bcc) and the contact would appear.
Now, I have to click the + sign at the end of the field line, and select recipients one at a time. Not only that, but I have to click twice to get to the email address, once on the name and then the email address drops down under the name and then I click on the email address. When I do that the drop down box disappears and the recipient's email address goes to the field. I have tried all combinations of buttons to be able to choose multiple addresses but haven't found the right one yet.
An Apple Support guy told me to open my regular Address book, and hold down the command button to choose multiple recipients then drag them to the field on my already opened send email.
This is one way around the issue (which wasn't an issue in Mavericks) but where some recipients have two or more email addresses listed in my contacts it means I have to manually go through the finished list on my emails to make sure the most desired one was selected. What a pain.
Also, previously, where I was sending out many emails and wanted to stop say half way down my list, and send, I could come back to that list for the next email and see where I'd got up to.
I don't want to make groups because my recipients vary depending on what I am sending so my lists change constantly.
Any suggestions?
Last point...who archives? On my regular email page I now have the Archive icon to the left of my Delete icon which I would prefer was to the left, first in the line as this is the icon I use mostly. With Folders, my Sent and Trash lists, who needs to archive?
Cheers,

Last point...who archives? On my regular email page I now have the Archive icon to the left of my Delete icon which I would prefer was to the left, first in the line as this is the icon I use mostly. With Folders, my Sent and Trash lists, who needs to archive?
I can help you only with the placement of the icon placement -- if you right-mouse click on the toolbar, then select Customize Toolbar, you can move an icon to where you want it to be.

How Can i Use two Different Public IP Addresses no my DMZ with ASA Firewall.

How To Using Two Different Public IP Address on My DMZ with ASA 5520
Postado por jorge decimo decimo em 28/Jan/2013 5:51:28
Hi everyone out there.
can any one please help me regarding this situation that im looking for a solution
My old range of public ip address are finished, i mean (the 41.x.x.0 range)
So now i still need to have in my DMZ another two servers that will bring some new services.
Remember that those two server, will need to be accessable both from inside and from outside users (Internet users) as well.
So as i said, my old range of public ip address is finished and we asked the ISP to gives some additional public
ip address to address the need of the two new servers on DMZ. and the ISP gave us the range of 197.216.1.24/29
So my quation is, on reall time world (on the equipment) how can i Use two different public ip address on the same DMZ
on Cisco ASA 5520 v8??
How my configuration should look like?
I was told about implementing static nat with Sub Interfaces on both Router and ASA interface
Can someone please do give me a help with a practical config sample please. i can as well be reached at [email protected]
attached is my network diagram for a better understanding
I thank every body in advance
Jorge

Hi,
So looking at your picture you have the original public IP address range configured on the OUTSIDE and its used for NAT for different servers behind the ASA firewall.
Now you have gotten a new public IP address range from the ISP and want to get it into use.
How do you want to use this IP address range? You want to configure the public IP addresses directly on the servers or NAT them at the ASA and have private IP addresses on the actual servers (like it seems to be for the current server)?
To get the routing working naturally the only thing needed between your Router and Firewall would be to have a static route for the new public network range pointing towards your ASA OUTSIDE IP address. The routing between your Router and the ISP core could either be handled with Static Routing or Dynamic Routing.
So you dont really need to change the interface configuration between the Router and ASA at all. You just need a Static route pointing the new public IP address towards the ASA outside IP address.
Now when the routing is handled between the ISP - ISP/Your Router - Your Firewall, you can then consider how to use those IP addresses.
Do you want to use the public IP addresses DIRECTLY on the HOSTS behind the firewall?This would require you to either configure a new physical interface with the new public IP address range OR create a new subinterface with the new public IP addresses range AND then configure the LAN devices correspondingly to the chosen method on the firewall
Do you want to use the public IP addresses DIRECLTY on the ASA OUTSIDE as NAT IP addresses?This would require for you to only start configuring Static NAT for the new servers between the inside/dmz and outside interface of the ASA. The format would be no different from the previous NAT configuration other than for the different IP addresses ofcourse
Of the above ways
The first way is good because the actual hosts will have the public IP addresses. Therefore you wont run into problems with DNS when the LAN users are trying to access the server.
The second way is the one requiring the least amount of configurations/changes on the ASA. In this case though you might run into problem with DNS (to which I refer above) as the server actually has a private IP address but the public DNS might reply to the LAN hosts with a public IP address and therefore connections from LAN could fail. This is because LAN users cant connect to the servers OUTSIDE NAT IP address (unless you NAT the server to public IP address towards LAN also)
Hopefully the above was helpfull. Naturally ask more specific questions and I'll answer them. Hopefully I didnt miss something. But please ask more
I'm currently at Cisco Live! 2013 London so in the "worst case" I might be able to answer on the weekend at earliest.
- Jouni

How to assign a private IP address to a public IP address

Hello.
At the beginning sorry for my poor English. My company uses a Cisco 881 router and I have the following problem to resolve. I need to assign an local IP address from my private network to an public IP address (this is the public IP address of the SMTP server). As a result, I want to do the following thing: I would like to use an local IP address in the SMTP server settings of the email client instead of an IP address of the service provider. Device, which I have to configure with SMTP server is connected via a VPN and I can't use a public IP address of email provider. Thank you for any respond.

Hello.
At the beginning sorry for my poor English. My company uses a Cisco 881 router and I have the following problem to resolve. I need to assign an local IP address from my private network to an public IP address (this is the public IP address of the SMTP server). As a result, I want to do the following thing: I would like to use an local IP address in the SMTP server settings of the email client instead of an IP address of the service provider. Device, which I have to configure with SMTP server is connected via a VPN and I can't use a public IP address of email provider. Thank you for any respond.

MULTIPLE PUBLIC IP ADDRESSES ON OUTSIDE INTERFACE

Hi All,
We are configuring an ASA 5510 for remote VPN users using Any Connect.
Our question is:
We have a /29 block of public IP addresses and we want to configure 5 public IP addresses on the Outside interface so that VPN users can use different DDNS logins that terminate on one of the 5 addresses. 1 of the 6 hosts in the subnet is the gateway address to the ISP router.
Any suggestions on how to best achieve this requirement.
Regards,

What are the different groups used for? Are that different companies or just different departments of one company?
There are so many ways to achieve different VPN-Settings for the users and all of them only work with the one public IP-address your ASA has on the outside interface.
One "typical" way to configure different VPN-settings for different users is the following:
You configure one tunnel-group with the needed authentication-settings. The assigned group-policy only has the needed tunnel-protocol configured like sssl-client.
For each department you configure one group-policy with all needed parameters like split tunnel, VPN-filter, banner, DNS/WINS-servers domain and so on.
Your users get one of these group-policies assigned. That can be done with local authentication in the user-acount, or more scalable through a central RADIUS-server which can be the Windows NPS to authenticate the domain-users.

Multiple public IP addresses

ASA newb here. This question has been asked before but the configurations seem to be different so they don't really answer my question. I think mine is pretty simple but I can't find a clear "this is what you do" answer. I've been reading the Cisco doc's trying to figure it out but they have so many different scenarios and examples that its a little overwhelming. Plus none of the seem to match mine 100%.
ASA 8.4
I have 6 public ip addresses and want to use 2 of them. I have two servers running an application that needs port 1234 accesable externally for updates. Can't change port numbers and obviously can't route 1234 two different places.
Say my range is 4.4.4.4 to 4.4.4.10. I want to use 4.4.4.4 and 4.4.4.5. My network currently looks like so:
4.4.4.4 <--> ASA <--> 192.168.0.0/24
I want:
4.4.4.4,4.4.4.5 <--> ASA <--> 192.168.0.0/24
Any ideas?

none taken.
Let me make sure i've got this right. I'll describe what i see in ASDM.
Line 1: Source Intf - inside, Dest Inft - Outside, Source - server2, Destination - any, Service - tcp/1234, Source - server2-outside, Destination - --Orginal--, Service --Original--
Line 2: Source Intf - outside, Dest Intf - inside, Source - any, Destination - server2-outside, Service - tcp/1234, Source --Original--(S), Destination - server 2, Service --Original--
I'm not entering your server1 info because I already have that setup and working.
ACL: Source - any, Destination - 192.168.1.5, Service - tcp/1234, Action - permit
Server2 = 192.168.1.5
Server2-Outside = 4.4.4.6 (my other external address)

WNR2000v4 issues public ip addresses

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for