Workflow Enhancements

We use HCM F&P and everything works well in the Production system.
We plan to make some enhancements to the Form like 1) Changes in Layout, 2) New Fields, 3) Changes in Workflow routing
We plan to introduce new container variables which will change workflow routing after the changes are done.
When we plan to release to the production system, what will happen to active workflows in the system?
(workflow which are not completed with old layout or does not have the variables set?)
What is the best way to minimize the impact to existing / work in progress workflows?

Sorry, I was fuzzy. My at work English does not translate well to decaf English. Many distractions. My apologies if I offended or sounded argumentative.
End result, we are "meaning" the same thing.
Let me re-explain my meaning to all,
SAP's WF Versions are misleading. What I meant by not a actual 'version' in prod, it creates a new version "number" in prod any time it gets transported to prod, regardless of versioning in dev. Period. But the version numbers probably won't match match up over time. i.e. ver 8 in dev may not match ver 8 in prod. You can't look at ver 8 in dev and expect ver 8 in prod to be same change.
If you DO create a new version in dev and transport it to prod, any inProcess WFs will maintain old template through completion.
If you DO NOT create a new version in dev and transport it to prod, any inProcess WFs will be a mix of old / new template.(i.e. mangled unusable mess sometimes).
Tasks of same number, overwritten regardless of version. Versioning "template" won't version Tasks.
Subflows? I don't recall. I suspect they would be treated like a Task.
All this is all verifiable by creating a test template in dev (or sand box). Create with a bunch of forks, tasks, conditions, outcomes, etc. Save. Create a bunch of WF instances at various states of completion. Then make modification to the template and see how it affects the running WFs and new WFs. Simple.
Create MANY test WFs in dev and Q and I know EXACTLY what it is going to do before it gets to prod. Personally, I like my weekends!
Again, apologies for any misunderstanding and length of this post. This is a very important concept WF'ers need to fully understand (and test) if you have complicated or mission critical processes.
Rick Sample

Similar Messages

N level-Approval for contract workflow (WS14000148) in SRM

Hi SDN'rs
I want to activate N level-Approval for contract workflow (WS14000148) in SRM
When I am creating the contract in SRM I can see the approvers in the approval preview.
But when I release the contract and look at the approval privew there are no approvers
and the status of the contract is released.
We are on SRM Server 5.5 and SP 07.
Here what I did
1. I implemented the BADI 'BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI' using the sample implementation and populated the approvers.
2. I activated events SAVED,CHANGEVERSIONSAVED for WS14000148 in OOCU transaction.
3. I see event linkages for WS14000148 for both events SAVED,CHANGEVERSIONSAVED in SWE2 transaction.
4. I assigned role SAP_EC_BBP_PURCHASER to for subworkflow N step for contract WS14000147.
( User who is creating contract has this role)
5. Consistency check for WS14000148 is green and WS14000147 is yellow in SWUD
6. Event simulation for BUS2000113 and events SAVED,CHANGEVERSIONSAVED shows WS14000148 successfully started.
I see dump in ST22 with errors TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED and SYSTEM_NO_SHM_MEMORY with WF-BATCH is this any thing to do with that?
If any one know what are the steps I am missing please let me know.
Thanks
A S

Hi
Please refer to these OSS notes which might help.
Refer to following OSS Notes ->
Note 735026 - Memory problems at BBP_GETLIST_INDEX_FILL
Note 932836 - BBP_GETLIST_INDEX_FILL: Activation not possible
879528 WS14000148: Send mail to initiator incorrect
901200 WS14000148 dia wrk item despite NO_FURTHER_APPROVAL_NEEDED=X
879873 BUS2000113: The Object_ID attribute may be empty
903015 BAdI Workflows: Events and parallel steps
901068 BAdI Workflows: Enhancement of Note 896556
769458 Dynamic workflows: No adjustment after document change
972757 Occurence of the SYSTEM_NO_SHM_MEMORY runtime error
741864 FinBasis: Termination TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED
864473 Deactivating the shared memory when searching by prefix
928642 Container factory: Shared memory dump update
Refer to these links.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/2c/e68d406b305537e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/26/0f8b41ed891609e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/6b/eca441eea7ef0be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/f7/a6a3415e34b05fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/6b/eca441eea7ef0be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm

Also raise an OSS message with SAP as well.
Regards
- Atul

Workflow applet in approval preview (shopping cart) changed in SRM 5.0

Hi,
we have upgrade from EBP 3.0 to SRM 5.0.
The approval preview in the shopping cart transactions (f.e. BBPSC03) now shows only the approval state (in grahpic mode), not the step description from the workflow definition.
In EBP 3.0 was showed the step description.
How can we change the applet output ?
B.Rauer

Hi
Please specify the SRM version(Support packs) details in next reply.
Meanwhile, please go through the following SAP OSS Notes, which will definitely help ->
Note 798295 BADI workflow: SRM 3.0 upgrade to 4.0 approver list -> main
Note 748655 SC APPROVAL GRAPHIC PREVIEW NOT CORRECT FOR BADI APPROVERS
Note 843636 PO BADI WORKFLOW does not assign correct approvers
Note 861147 BAdI workflow: Adjusting step name to runtime
Note 883207 BBP_WFL_DIN_APPR_BY_RULE_GET: if BAdI not implemented
Note 713567 SRM-EBP-WFL: Limit is ignored in WS14000109
Note 923463 BAdI n-step approval - Container inconsistent for 1st step
Note 901068 BAdI Workflows: Enhancement of Note 896556
Note 898768 BADI Workflow: Determining current approvers
Note 861147 BAdI workflow: Adjusting step name to runtime
Note 688724 BADI workflow: Problems with substitute
Note 788584 BADI Workflow: empty WI_ID in approver table
Note 780021 BADI Workflow: subsequent approvers after rejection
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Urgent - Workflow (WF14000133)

Hello
We use SRM Server5.5(Classic scenario)
We implemented BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI for WF14000133
But agent is not assgined. When i check the workflow log using swi1, there is no agent. System show the message " all users can process this task", when i click the agent button.
And all users received the work item, even if they are not correct approver.
I found a lot of notes to solve this problem.
923463 BAdI n-step approval - Container inconsistent for 1st step
901068 BAdI Workflows: Enhancement of Note 896556
898768 BADI Workflow: Determining current approvers
909871 Error in BAdI workflow without approval
903015 BAdI Workflows: Events and parallel steps
894978 APPROVERLIST container element has incorrect approver status
870391 Programming for the BAdI workflow
910612
784408 Item approval: Rejected items in BADI
We have SRM server 5.5 and SP07.
Should i apply these notes? Or is there any solution?
Next week, we will take the 1st integration test.
Could you give me a solution or tip?
Thank you
Best Regards
SH

Hi So Hee Lee,
If the shoe fits! I'd most certainly apply the notes to the test system if they are applicable and match the problem description. I'd also test with the standard BADI before i go editing it. As your on such a high prod/support pack level, shouldnt these notes already be in the system??
Just make sure that your rules are correct. Check with help.sap.com
Hope this helps,
w

Approval workflow - email notification

Hi,
I was run out of idea how to complete my assigned job, need oracle expert to help on email notification workflow.
Currently I am working on workflow enhancement with oracle application E-Business Suite for our company.
My job is to add in new approval process to approve Bank Details transaction through AME.
For this Bank Details transaction, the existing approval process is will only route to HR.
Now my job is to add Admin & Manager approval, which mean once the transaction is submitted and the approval processes are as below:
Admin --> Manager --> HR
But this approval process will fall into 2 scenarios as below criteria.
Scenario1: If the selected Bank Name from List Of View (LOV) not "Other Bank" then the approval process is Manager --> HR
Scenario2: If the selected Bank Name from LOV is "Other Bank" (once Other Bank selected, user will need to enter the new Bank Name) then the approval process is Admin --> Manager --> HR
Once Admin approve, Admin will add the new Bank Name into LOV.
Both scenarios will auto trigger email notification to the approver once there is pending for Admin and Manager approval.
For scenario1, our email process package able to send out email notification to the manager.
But for scenario2, email notification not send to Admin. FYI, our Admin is a group of persons assigned to Admin group.
My doubt here is how to let this email notification able to send out to Admin group?
Hopefully anyone of oracle workflow expert could help me as soon as possible.
Thanks.

Hi Mike,
According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to use workflow to send emails to the approvers when a task process completed in SharePoint Designer 2010.
First, when you add the “Start Approval Process” action to create the workflow in SharePoint Designer 2010, you can click on “these users” to set the task process participants and you can choose “One at
a time (serial)” or “All at once (parallel)” to set how the tasks will
be created.
Then, if you want to send an email to the approver when a single task process completed, you can click on “Approval” in the
“Start Approval Process” step to edit the task process and click on “Change the behavior of a single task” in the “Customization”
to add the “Send a Task Notification Email” action in “When a Task Completes” section as below:
And if you want to send emails to the all approvers when all tasks are completed, you can click on “Approval” in
the “Start Approval Process” step to edit the task process and click on “Change the behavior of the overall task process” in
the “Customization” to add the “Send an Email” action in “When the Task Process Completes” section as below:
If you want to use the approval workflow to update the content approval status, then you can add the “Set Workflow Variable” action to set “Variable: EnableContentApproval” to “Yes” after you add the “Start
Approval Process” action in the workflow, and it should be added above the step “Start Approval Process”.
Please refer to the link below to add the “Set Workflow Variable” step in the workflow:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/b5bebacf-4bb9-4e43-84d7-6eb2714f071d/is-there-an-option-to-set-content-approval-status-according-to-approval-process-workflow?forum=sharepointcustomizationprevious
Best Regards,
Victoria
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Questions about export in OnLocation CS4

Hi, I was wondering if there is any benefit to using the export feature in OnLocation CS4 over merely opening the project folder and grabbing the files. It seems to just copy the files with an .xml file (?) into a new folder (which takes a long time) and is prone to crashing -which has happened to me twice. Any thoughts?
Thanks!
JP

Michael,
I've actually given up. The Export feature crashed on me twice doing... well... who knows? Easier and more reliable to just go into the folder and pluck the files myself.
The only purpose I can guess at is if you were working on a SAN or other networked storage. That way you could keep working/shooting while OnLocation copied the ready footage to your SAN for editing elsewhere. If you use the OS directly, it would drag all the resources. But that's my only guess.
Honestly, I am really disappointed with CS4. It seems that Adobe spent all this time incorporating "workflow enhancements" (like XML metadata, speech recognition, and that export feature) that they ignored, removed, or broke pieces that are crucial to the work to begin with. There are a few things I like (the new AME, the look of the interface, improved HDV/AVCHD handling) but it comes with sooooo many trade-offs.
JP

How do I change media start timecode?

I'm working on a project that was handed to me after a significant amount of capturing had already been done. Much of the footage (I'm praying that not all of it is like this) was captured using Capture Now, so there is no room left for pre-roll on any of the clips I am now trying to recapture (literally like 2 frames). I searched the forum and the web for a solution, but came up with some solutions that didn't work in my particular case. I have made the clips offline which for other users seems to have solved the problems of not being able to edit the Media Start/Media End timecode, but I still cannot get it to work.
Could it be that since I've used the clip in a sequence, it will not let me edit the timecode? Assuming there is some solution, and I am able to change the timecode, will any clips in sequences be trimmed to match the changes (for example, if I used the beginning of a clip in a sequence, and have now changed that clips beginning timecode, will it automatically trim the clip in the sequence or will it not reconnect at all?)
I'm working in FCP 4.5.
Thanks a bunch

Hey Jack
]Thanks for your continued posts Peter.
Always happy to help out, but thankyou for the acknowledgment! Often busy stressed people on this board forget that essential ingredient of good manners! So thank you!
]Does that really solve it? I'm not sure that it does
Absolutely! I had exactly your situation a couple of years ago, when I took over a job from someone who hadn't left any room on clips. I gave adding extended handles a shot, and it worked.
Once again I am just sorry I did not remember this workaround sooner.
As always, I would do a little test run first. I have mentioned this previously on the board, but I will again because I find it an invaluable tip:
]A good little technique I have gotten into over the years is learning any new functionality in FCP with what I call my dummy project, dummy.fcp.
]This is just a normal FCP file with a couple of dozen clips, a few sequences and so on. Nothing too fancy, but designed to tap into most of the essential features, and broadly represent a typical type of job I do.
]Every time I want to try something new, and am worried I might damage existing work, I close the project I am working on, make a duplicate of dummy.fcp, and experiment on that. And I do it a couple of times, just to make sure for myself that the new functionality is well understood and predictable. I even try and do it wrong a couple of times, just to see what the results of mistakes would be like... Better learning through mistakes on your dummy ...
]If things go crazy, I have lost nothing, my current real-life project file is safe, and one of thee following is true:
] I am doing something wrong -- so I log on here
] I dont understand the functionality - so I log on here
] FCP might have a bug -- so I log on here
] All of the above -- so I log on here
I recommend that you -- and everyone else! -- make one of these dummy projects for yourself, and try this solution out. And keep a copy for later, when you come across that next possible workflow enhancement / project destruction tool.
Regards
Peter

Can you please tell the difference between FSCM 8.8 and 9.0

Hi,
Can you please tell me the difference b/n PeopleSoft FSCM 8.8 and 9.0.
What are major changes took place in application from 8.8 to 9.0 and also in tools 8.46 and 8.49.
Thanks

Well There is lots of Stuff but hey I will take a crack at it
First off you will have to go to PeopleTool 8.49 : you get new stuff for IB, XML publisher, Archive Mangers, and too much to cover here....Financials adds:
Credit Card Encryption
Workflow Enhancements
Expenses:
Save and Hold functionality
enable approvers to add transaction lines during the approval process.
Compare Totals
Payabales
Financial Santion Validations
Digital Sig on Electronic Invoices
Tons of Voucher enhancements : sales Use Tax, ssesion defualts, related documents page
Streamlined withholding process
Payment Processing Enhancements: mass payment cancellations
AM
Fair Market Value tracking
Depr. Write-off Reval. Method
Multiple Deprecation Enchnacements:
General Assets;
Operational attributes and creation of non-financial assets
Asset component hierarchy enhancements
Configurable attributes for asset definition
Other enhancements to the asset repository
General Ledger
Enhanced spreadsheet import.
Enhanced combination editing.
Enhanced audits of VAT report amounts.
XML Publisher for ChartField reporting

Approval Preview issue

Hi,
Recently we upgraded our production system to SRM 5.5 Server from SRM 3.0. We were using a custom N-step BADI workflow in SRM 3.0. After upgrading it to SRM 5.5 server(we are using the std N-step BADI workflow in our upgraded system), the PO workflows that were awaiting approval before upgrade are not showing the approvers in the approval preview. But the new PO's seems to work fine. The approver list in the wofkflow container for these PO workflows are empty. Have anyone faced this issue before?
Regards,
Maria.

Hi Maria,
   You need to apply several OSS notes based on the Support pack level for the BADI issues like no display of approvers in Apoproval preview,java applet error etc....
Some of them are listed below...Please cehck as epr your SP level whcih ones need to be applied....
Note 999528 - Adding Ad Hoc Approver fails due to comit error
Note 952108 - Incorrect error message when approvers are entered
Note 809157 - BBPPREVIEW: Error "Value too large" as of fourth approver
Note 994735 - All BAdI workflows: ApprovalIndex does not begin with 1
Note 924064 - FM BBP_WFL_DIN_FILL_APPROVER: Approvers may be incorrect
Note 983128 - Approval WF Fragment Has No User Assignment
923463     BAdI n-step approval - Container inconsistent for 1st step
901068     BAdI Workflows: Enhancement of Note 896556
909871     Error in BAdI workflow without approval
903015     BAdI Workflows: Events and parallel steps
894978     APPROVERLIST container element has incorrect approver status
903200     Note for approval status not getting updated
910612     additional note fro SC approval BADI's and WF's
649551     Approval status not getting updated-related note for SP8
690716     Approval status not getting updated-related note for SP8
930750     restart of classic WF's(issue is with Support pack 9)
525577     Approval Preview - Details for approver not displayed.
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Image flickering from adjustment layer

OK so using premiere CC 2014 i get an awful flicker on video that I have applied adjustment layers to, if i remove the layer it plays cleanly but with the layer it flickers. whats the fix?

Hello Shane,
I would like to know if Adobe is working on a solution & when we might see a resolution.
Indeed. That would be nice if Adobe would even acknowledge this issue and state whether they are working on a fix or not. Even them stating that they are aware of it but not sure what the fix is would be nice too, at least we will no they are trying to work on it. As I said in a earlier in this thread, this started happening 2 versions ago. So here we are almost coming up on a year later and 2 versions later and still no fix (or acknowledgement that I'm aware of other than someone like Kevin asking for more info).
To my knowledge, no. As far as I know, we have not been able to reproduce the issue in house. If we can't reproduce the issue, we can't fix it. I've not seen the issue on my own systems.
If someone can list specific steps to reproduce the bug, and I can definitely reproduce them here on my own machine, I would be happy to write up the bug. That said, I have brought the issue up to the team and I've certainly acknowledged the issue on other threads.
For businesses problems like these are not welcome at all, and i believe most would much rather more focus on stability than new features.
My sentiment exactly. Every new update since the advent of the cloud model which seems to be approx every 4 months or so, Adobe always comes out with a bunch of new features, workflow enhancements, etc. Personally, I'd like to see an update or two with no new features and Adobe just concentrating on fixes. New features are great, but get the old features and kinks worked out first.
Yes, you see this from customers a lot. Focus on bug fixes/stability/etc, not new features. Thing is, we do fix a substantial amount of issues in every release. These issues come directly from customer reports, bug reports, our product improvement program, our beta testers, from internal testing, etc.
Here you go:
What's Fixed in Premiere Pro CC2014.2
What's New and What's Fixed in 2014.1
And these aren't even the complete lists of fixed items. The bottom line is that it is a very fine line to walk, balancing between what's wanted and what's needed. That said, focusing on certain areas of concern, like performance and stability are still done. For example, After Effects has had relatively few features over the past year because they are focusing on performance (and have indicated they are doing so).
If you'd like the Premiere Pro team to focus efforts on stability, for example, by all means, let those that are in charge of the product know how you feel in a feature request/bug report here: http://www.adobe.com/go/wish
IMO PP is the best editing software out there. I am understanding that no software is 100% perfect (bug free). There are endless different user configurations, hardware configurations, etc that there is no way PP will run 100% perfect on every system out there.
For sure. In my own configurations, my MacBook Pro has been solid in OS X 10.8.5 for some time now. I was gun-shy at updating to Mavericks because QuickTime is treated so differently now. I must say, that I've not seen any of these odd issues seen by Mavericks and Yosemite users at all.
My i7/Quadro 4000 Windows system on 8.1 has also been flawless.
For me, it's not easy testing these issues because everything I run "just works."
But if Adobe can at least address the most common major bugs such as this flickering one which appears a major problem across a broad spectrum of users that would be great.
We definitely would if we could reproduce the issue. If you have set steps to reproduce the issue every time, please let me know. I certainly would love to help solve the issue for users that are having the problem.
Thanks,
Kevin

Allow processing of Virtual Copies at lower resolutions than original RAW

At times an original image is slightly soft, but looks just fine when processed at a lower resolution. In ACR the ability to do the RAW processing itself with a preview of the image rendered at a lower resolution than the original is most helpful in such situations. It would be fabulous if in LR it was possible to create a VC of a file that was set to a lower resolution than the original, e.g. 5Mpx from an 8.2MPx RAW image, with all processing and previews of that Virtual Copy then being displayed with a 100% zoom being the 5MPx image. Currently you have to guess what a downsized export might look like, or take it into Photoshop, for what might be a simple operation.

This seems to be a very frequently requested feature, and fo rus it would certainly be the #1 missing functionality.
We use Lightroom to work on large batches of event/wedding photographs, all taken in RAW format.
1. With current 'absolute' presets, there's no telling what it will do to any given photograph: a "antique photograph" preset will do wildly different thing to a photograph under tungsten, as to a photograph under sunlight or fluorescent or flash.
2. Similarly, our workflow is interrupted: instead of being able to colour/exposure correct all images and then apply a preset to this _fixed_, 'normalized' version, for consistency of look; we have to play with images one by one, or go to workarounds like export/import: all of which defeat the point of Lightroom as a workflow-enhancing app.

Email Scheduler Now Works! (Apple Script!)

Hey everyone,
For all wondering how to schedule emails ahead of time to go out, the programmer has updated the "Schedule Delivery" Apple Script and it now works. I tried this 2 years ago and it was a pain after 10.5 as it was very buggy. But now it's up and running!
Mail Scripts - 2.9.1
Workflow-enhancing AppleScripts for Mail & Address Book
http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/16217

thanks a lot for the info. this ability is often requested. MailScripts was the only tool to offer it but it didn't work in leopard. of course, Apple really ought to have this functionality built in...

LR 3 Requests

Before LR 3 is locked down some of my requests from the Flickr LR forum, mainly workflow issues rather than feature requests, so hopefully pretty easy to implement - it's about making LR a faster to use software more than anything else, a lot of this is based on PhotoMechanic, a very fast and mature image browser used by news photographers. <http://camerabits.com/site/index.html>
Sequence renaming to be continuous rather than resetting to 001 whenever a new export is started. Obviously a reset button would be required.
Automatically use portions ITPC/EXIF data into all the editable fields like the 'variables' feature of PhotoMechanic. Once you get your head around how powerful a feature this is, you wonder how you ever survived without it before. Having the date, day of the week and photographer's name entered into the caption field automatically is a godsend, especially if you are editing more than one photographers work.
Code Replacement, again a PhotoMechanic feature.
www.sportsshooter.com/news/1951
www.sportsshooter.com/message_display.html?tid=20381
www.jasonowatson.com/blog/2008/12/27/using-photo-mechanic...
If LR is to be a complete workflow tool, then these workflow enhancements will really speed up the users experience and remove a lot of user error, especially with complicated names and dates.
All of the above would be pretty simple to implement into the keywording/metadata portion of LR.
Easily split the exporting of large numbers of images into batches in one go to take advantage of the multiple export speed up tip - or an option to export using more than one 'core' or whatever it's called.
FTP of individual images to remote servers
Sending of individual images to email clients
Sort by File size,
Sort by dimensions
This helps with sorting legacy files and the various iterations if they have been re-sized for the web etc.
In a perfect world, bolting on PM to the front end of LR, so you could do an immediate first edit on deadline, using PM's speed and metadata tools, send to develop and then export and FTP away would be heaven, whilst the rest of the folder imported into LR in the background for DAM purposes, alternatively licence the Develop module to CameraBits (makers of PM) for them to incorporate into PM. Never gonna happen but one can dream of a perfect world ;-))
Consistency of keystrokes between toggling a function and a keystroke doing a single task.
E.G.
B can either remove an image from the target collection or add it depending on it's status. Whereas the simpler and less prone to making mistakes is the single keystroke for a specific action.
P,U and X all have very clear results and when working fast and under deadline I don't wish to have to confirm what action has taken place - either what I want or the opposite of it.
A keystroke to switch off or on the adjustments in the different develop panels rather than the small click toggle like on Camera Raw in PS.
Adding a conditional key to the 1-5/0 keystrokes and [ ] for the star rating attributes , it is too easy to change an image's rating when changing the brush size. - And as the view auto updates the image is then gone from the selection - annoying.
To be able to have the Info displayed in "loupe" in LIbrary but have the option to not have it display in the develop view.
I want to be able to see the info when making my selections but it's distracting to have the info displayed when making image corrections, it would be great not to have to cycle through the views, just more unnecessary keystrokes.
Shortcut consistency
Using the hand tool in develop panel - zoomed view, don't use the spacebar to move around the image, that changes the zoom level, however you must use the space bar (like Photoshop, which is good) to move around the image when using the adjustment brush at a zoomed view.
Bad workflow, not being consistent in the keystrokes, to do the same operation in different 'views'
These are all about making the user think about the image and the adjustments rather than the computer and having to think about whats to do next.
Thanks

hsbn has the right answer.
In the D7000 Setup menu > Auto image rotation > ON.
LR 3.3RC displays the portrait orientation photos correctly.

Creating files in cs5.5 trial...

If I create a file in DW CS 5.5 Trial, will I be able to edit it in DW CS 5.1 Full Version?
We have Adobe Creative Suite 5.1 where I work, but I would like to work on a personal project, at home, with the trial, then be able to stay after hours when I need to to tweak any last minute things and then publish.

Trial versions of Adobe's software are full versions that are usable for a limited amount of time.
Adobe's Dreamweaver (all versions) creates HTML files with CSS stylesheets. While version 5.5 has a number of workflow enhancements and understands the HTML5 and CSS3 proposed standards better than earlier versions, all versions of Dreamweaver can open the files and edit them.
I have both Dreamweaver CS3 and Dreamweaver CS5.5 on my Mac. Both coexist and can read each others' files. I have a lot of older sites that are defined in Dreamweaver CS3 that I don't open in CS5.5 because I don't have those sites defined in CS5.5 but I suppose I could.
If you are uploading files from your copy of Dreamweaver, make sure that the older versions are not overwritten by the work people. One may consider doing check in and check out of files in that case, though I would recommend that you upload from one particular computer and not make that your home computer.
Take your work on a thumb drive. Many complete websites will fit on a thumb drive. Move your new stuff (created at home) onto your defined site using the operating system, overwriting the older files. Then upload to the server at work.

N Step Approval BADI - BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI

We have implemented this BADI and are having problems with the agent determination.
When creating and ordering the cart the approval preview shows the correct approval agents.
When clicking the 'Agents' button within the workflow log via SWI1, the message 'No selected agents' (Message no. WL795) is shown.
The buffers have been refreshed via SWU_OBUF and the indexes and organisational environment have been refreshed.
Has anyone had this problem before, and if so what steps did you have to undertake to cure it ?
Thanks
Keith

Hi
Please specify the SRM version(Support packs) details in next reply.
Meanwhile, please go through the following SAP OSS Notes, which will definitely help ->
Note 798295 BADI workflow: SRM 3.0 upgrade to 4.0 approver list -> main
Note 748655 SC APPROVAL GRAPHIC PREVIEW NOT CORRECT FOR BADI APPROVERS
Note 843636 PO BADI WORKFLOW does not assign correct approvers
Note 861147 BAdI workflow: Adjusting step name to runtime
Note 883207 BBP_WFL_DIN_APPR_BY_RULE_GET: if BAdI not implemented
Note 713567 SRM-EBP-WFL: Limit is ignored in WS14000109
Note 923463 BAdI n-step approval - Container inconsistent for 1st step
Note 901068 BAdI Workflows: Enhancement of Note 896556
Note 898768 BADI Workflow: Determining current approvers
Note 861147 BAdI workflow: Adjusting step name to runtime
Note 688724 BADI workflow: Problems with substitute
Note 788584 BADI Workflow: empty WI_ID in approver table
Note 780021 BADI Workflow: subsequent approvers after rejection
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Workflow Enhancements

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for