Workflow Item not created while processing draft PO from SOCO

Dear SAP SRM Experts,
In SRM 7.0, I've a scenario where I create a PO draft in sourcing.
In the 3step of the GAF, I've the option to
1. Edit the PO and order it.
2. Directly process the PO draft to create a PO..
While in case one the WF item is created with status awaiting approval, in the second case (when I directly process the draft) the workflow item is not created but the status is still 'Awaiting Approval' !!.
Use of PC workflow is done and the PO is not auto approved.
Any pointer regarding this would be very helpful.
The call stack is way different between the first step and second.
My understanding is if there is some error in the follow on PO, the work item would not be created. But the SC in soco is similar and while in first case it does create the workitem in second case it doesn't.
When does the decision to create workflow item is decided in second case?
Thanks.
Shushant

Hi Guys,
Thanks for your inputs.
The problem has been identified. The error is because  the vendors are deleted completly from the system. And those were  earlier used in shopping cart as preffered vendor. Thats why the system is throwing the error message. 
As we can not process this SC further we want to delete this SC (line item).  But again while deleting the SC the system is throwing the error message . "Business partner xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx not found."  Thus its not allowing us to delete the SC.
Do you have any ideas how we can delete the SC line items, or  SC ?  Any FM ?
Thank you,

Similar Messages

  • Outbound ORDRSP IDOC not created while processing  using ALE_PROCESSING .

    HI ALL,
    i have done all the requiured config for o/b message control for ORDRSP idoc along with config in sale for dist.. model and assigning msg type to model etc and when i save my PO i can see the o/p being proposed but when i process that with A as medium, it is incorectly processed and no ordrsp idoc is created.i am using std idoc_output_ordrsp FM,  when i debug the code the see an error in ALE_PROCESSING IN the perform new_dyn_perform
    can anyone pls tell me why the idoc is not created.
    thanks,

    Hi eswar,
    i have configured the partner profile for the LOGICAL SYSTEM that i hav created along with the message control deatils in msg ctrl tab( which i think should not really matter) as i have already created a distrib. model for my log. sys and attached my msg typ to that.
    when i debug the flow ( rsnast00-rsnasted-ale_processing-idoc_output_ordrsp) i think the error is somewhere in the call function tede1-routid( idoc_output_ordrsp) in the new_dyn_perform subroutine.
    but that FM is holding good for other ORDRSP idocs.i am really unable to understand where the error actually is.
    thanks

  • Item not created because service agent AG not in reference document

    While creating Shipment cost document through VI01 for inbound transportation getting the following error 'Item not created because service agent AG not in reference document '.  PLease advice how to resolve this
    Regards
    Somnath Das

    Hi,
    Please Refer the following link...it will solve your issue....
    VI01 - Item not created because service agent AG not in reference document
    Regards,
    Udaya.

  • VI01 - Item not created because service agent AG not in reference document

    Hello Experts,
    While creating Shipping Cost Document (VI01) no line items are getting created. And I am getting Log Message as mentioned below.
    Log Generated : "Item not created because service agent AG not in reference document"
    In reference document Service Agent is already there..
    Any inputs???
    Thanks in Advance..
    Regards,
    HP

    Hi,
    If you go to VT02N and in the lower part of the screen you have several tabs. If you go to the tab stages you should see 1 or more stages. In this stage there should also be a forwarding agent.
    It could also be that you're not able to create a costing document because the status does not allow it. You can check in SPRO/LOG EX/ Transportation/ Shipmpent costs/ Shipment cost document / Shipment cost types and item categories/ double click on shipment type and you will see what status a shipment must have in order to create a costing document.
    However, I expect that that is ok, else the error message would have been different.
    MdZ

  • MS Outlook 2010 Add in Create pdf - does not create pdf of draft emails- Adobe Acrobat Pro X

    In MS Outlook 2010 Add in Create pdf- does not create pdf of draft emails- this maybe the case, but just wanted to make sure this is normal for the program- though I guess one can print as an Adobe pdf but it does not maintain the hyperlinks of email addresses etc. the functionality is compromised in a print vs create a pdf.

    Here's a workaround by the team:
    Right click on the message from Explorer list view or folder view and chose the option to convert to PDF.

  • CO-PA document is not created while doing the sale order cycle

    Dear Experts,
    I have 4 company codes in my controlling area. I did all CO-PA configuration. But CO-PA Document is generated in Only one company code. Remaining company codes CO-PA document is not created while doing the sale order cycle
    I’ve carried a standard sales cycle that contains sales order (VA01),
    and (VF04,VF02). System should generate 4
    documents as follows
    1) FI Document
    2) CO Document
    3) Profit Center Accounting Document
    4) COPA Document
    But in my case for 3 company codes only 3 documents are generated instead of CO-PA. But for one company code 4 documents are generated.
    In my case i did all settings Operation concern level and assign to controlling area. I can,t Understood why system is generating CO-PA document for Only one company
    Please suggest me where i miss the settings..
    Regards,
    Krishna.V

    Dear Ajay,
    Cost element category is 01. Because hear is one another company they have FI only all transactions they maintain through FI only. so hear we maintain Cost elements category 01.
    I think it is not a problem. because hear i got CO-PA document from one company. Remaining 3 company is not generated.
    Hear we maintained all gl's chart of acc level and cost elements also.
    Please suggest me...
    Regards,
    Krishna. v

  • HT4060 My USB charger is not supporting while i am connecting from PC to iPad for charging (showing as " Not Charging"), Kindly advice me

    My USB charger is not supporting while i am connecting from PC to iPad for charging (showing as " Not Charging"), Kindly advice me

    Hi Folks,
    I have tried most of what have been said here ( thank you for the great Job) but unforunatally it didn't solve the issue.
    However, now the "Not Charging" message in the right corner disappeared and my iPad is charging normally from my laptop.
    The reason behind that is using the USB3.0 port in my Dell inspiron N5110. Earlier, I was using the USB 2.0  ports and that is why it was showing that message but as sooon as I pluged it in the eSATA USB 3.0 port , the message disapeared and the iPad started charging normally.
    So don't waste ur time here and there try to plug it to USB 3.0 port and it will works, Insha ALLAH.
    Cheers
    KoRn

  • Line items are not appearing while processing F-44

    With transaction F-44, to clear vendor account, the system displays only one open item, whereas there are 2 open items on the line item report (FBL1N). Further there are two line items in BSIK.
    Please help

    Hello,
    There are two line items in the Vendor account, the details are as follows:
    Date             Amount                  PK                 DR/Cr
    31.03.2008   12,050.00                38                      Cr
    05.06.2008   12,050.00                28                      Dr
    of above while processing F-44, we are able to see only debit item dated 05.06.2008.other line item is not appearing. When tried by putting document number, it says "NO OPEN ITEMS FOUND"

  • Approvers of Rejected line items not getting removed -Process controlled WF

    I have developed shopping cart approval using process controlled workflow. We are using SRM 7.0, patch level 9.
    Decision set used is item based approval for partial documents (Type 4)
    While testing I observed that when I reject any item, the corresponding approvers of that items are not getting removed.
    As per your requirement, if we create SC with 2 items A and B. Based on various conditions
    2 process levels are determined for item A, say approver X and approver Y at respective level.
    3 process levels are determined for item B, say approver X, approver Z1 and Z2.
    Approver X, rejects item A and approves item B. Since one item is rejected, the work item is sent to requestor for acceptance. All process levels are of type "Approval". Once the requestor clicks on "Accept" button, the item A, which is rejected gets deleted from the shopping cart.
    However now when I see the Approval Process Overview, the current approver shown is Y. The work item is sent to approver Y and the value of the shopping cart is shown as 0.00. Logically the approver Y should have been removed from approval process.
    Could you let me know if I am missing any step or do I need to do some coding to get rid of approvers of rejected items.
    Regards,
    Manish.

    We were using N-step process level on the item level contrast to example provide by SAP of N-step process leve on Header level. SAP uses standard tables /SAPSRM/D_WF_015 and /SAPSRM/D_WF_016 to implement the logic. We have customized the solution with logic on same line of sap but using bespoke tbale ZSAPSRM_D_WF_016. Let me know if anyone needs solution.

  • Transfer Order not created while performing GR for Production order

    Hi, I am facing a problem while recieving stock from a production order. The system does not create a transfer requirement or a TO.
    Let me give you a brief background.
    This is a new functionality introduced in ECC 6.0 for working with kanban in WM.
    Supply area is created for WM location.
    Control cycle is created for material, supply area. Warehouse, storage type and Bin is maintained in control cycle record. When the GR is done for production order material is recieved in this bin.
    1) Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
    2) Once the production order is confirmed the material automatically shows up in the bin.
    A material document is created which shows IM movement type 101 and WM movement type 103. Also in material document Immediate auto TO checkmark is blank.
    3) *PROBLEM* - System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin. How can we enable an auto TR and TO creation.
    Following are the settings which I have already checked:
    1) In IMG, WM movement type 103 has auto TO indicator set.
    2) IM-WM interface for 102 movement type and 103 movement type is maintained.
    The main problem is: Although the material document displays WM movement type 103 and the stock lies in WM bin, System never created a Transfer requirement or a Transfer order.
    I would really appreciate if anyone can help me in this.
    Thanks

    Hi Mike,
    I do not know this function in SAP, so these are just my ideas:
    1.
    System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin.
    I think it's a normal SAP behaviour. If you do GR against a PO the quant(s) will appear in interim storage bin w/o TO. The TO is to move the quants from one bin to another, but in this case the quant comes from 'nothing' and arrives at the bin.
    If you make confirmation and consume the components refering to a PrdOrd, the components will disappear w/o TO from storage type 100 + dynamic bin, because there's no TO that could move them from dynamic bin to 'nothing'.
    So, these 'movements' are to change the WM stock level and TOs are not designed for this.
    2.
    There's difference between auto creation of TO and immediate TO creation. Please check what SAP help says in case of TOs for outbound deliveries:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f8406c4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    3.
    Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
    So, if you remove the stock from the Kanban it triggers the creation of a PrdOrd. This is very logical in a Kanban system because it is a pull system. but your problem is not this, it's clear.
    If you just created an automatic TO and would remove the stock from Kanban-bin, a new PrdOrd would be generated, and so on. As many times you remove the stock a new PrdOrd is created and this might be the reason why no TO is crated automatically. In this case this would be a push system and not kanban system.
    I do not know this process but if we concentrate only on the pull system, maybe this Kanaban is to store the FG until an event (e.g. shipment) should trigger the stock removal from this bin. (just my assumption)
    Please try to mark the TR creation for the movement type w/o auto / immediate TO and tell us the result (whether you get the TR if you confirm the PrdOrd).
    Regards,
    Csaba

  • Need to deactivate task that generates workflow items not needed anymore

    Hi,
    Some users are currently getting workflow items with the error message: "Header del.date/Qty different than line item;..." for inbound orders. The users don't want to receive this error message anymore on their inboxes.
    I found out this error message is generated by the TS90100001. How can I find out if this task only generates this error message or if it is used to something else? And also, if this is the case, how can I deactivate this task?
    Thanks!
    Andrea

    Hi,
    I don't have access to TCode SWE2, if you think it would be useful for me, I'll request the access.
    I entered to see what the task does and found out the name of it which is: Order Change after post processing error.
    Object Category: BO BOR Object Type
    Object Type: ZBUS2032
    Method: CHANGE
    Not familiar with this sorry
    Thanks,
    Andrea

  • GRC AC v10 SPM WF - Workflow Item not showing up in WF Inbox

    GRC AC v10 - SP12
    The outlook email notification for the Workflow Item goes out, but there is nothing in the NWBC Inbox for the WF Item. Subsitution is setup correctly.
    Any ideas?
    -john

    Hi John
    this is probably be a silly question but what substitution did you set up for ZFF_CTL_01? I assume the item is in that user's inbox. Which user is meant to be receiving?
    I also noticed this KB article (1589130) which mentions the delegated person needs GRAC_REQ authorisation. Have you checked if security access issue?
    There was also mention that the delegated approver does not appear in the MSMP instance runtime (your screen shot suggests same situation unless you have not set up the delegation). SP14 delivers the fix or refer to  1915928 - UAM: Delegated Approver is not visible in the Instance status
    Possibly have a look at both of them to see if they resolve your issue.
    Regards
    Colleen

  • Multiple document numbers not created while creating multiple idocs.

    Hi Experts,
    we have developed one the interface file to idoc, whenever invoice number change it will create a multiple idocs.
    but i am facing some issue with context handling, can you suggest the suitable mapping / UDF for the below issue.
    Our customized idoc structure has header and line items and both are in not same level-its parent child structure.
    in our sample file there are three different invoice number and as per the requirement its creating three idocs and corresponding headers but not line item details.
    all line item details creating in 1st idoc itself and 2nd and 3rd idoc has only header items no line items. but tried fix with graphical mapping context handling for this problem but not resolved. please advise.
    Regards,
    Krushi.

    hi Hareesh,
    thank you for your quick response.
    after the File Adapter FCC, below is the inbound payload, first four feilds we mapped to header and rest for line items.
    <SettlementDetails>
    <row>
      <PaymentType>CHECK</PaymentType>
      <Filler></Filler>
      <Currency>IN</Currency>
      <Filler1></Filler1>
      <Invoice>100410-133MT5-MH</Invoice>
      <Filler2></Filler2>
      <SettlementMethod>4</SettlementMethod>
      <Filler3></Filler3>
      <PreferredTradingPartnerIdentifier>MT</PreferredTradingPartnerIdentifier>
      <Filler4></Filler4>
      <FinalPayAmount>12.00</FinalPayAmount>
      <Filler5></Filler5>
      <ProductIDUnformatted>55111064001</ProductIDUnformatted>
      <Filler6></Filler6>
      <Filler7></Filler7>
      <Filler8></Filler8>
      <PaytoPreferredTradingPartnerIdentifier>MT</PaytoPreferredTradingPartnerIdentifier>
      <ClaimType>ORIG</ClaimType>
      <CMSRecordID>FFSU</CMSRecordID>
    </row>
    </SettlementDetails>
    multiple settlement details will be there.
    regards,
    krushi.

  • Lockbox: Partial payment is not creating when processing Lockbox file

    Hello experts,
    I am processing the Lockbox EDI 823 file but it is not creating the partial payment instead of that it is creating the Residual. I already check my config OBAY and I have "Partial Payment" checked.
    MY business really doesnu2019t want to have original invoice cleared and create the new one in case of over/under payment outside the tolerance limit. Please let me know how I can resolve this issue.
    Thanks
    Farooq

    Hi Hema,
    Is the SAP document is from the same company code, where the lockbox is configured or it is a different company code?
    If you have an user exit and if all the company codes having same document numbering, then the lockbox program may not able to pick up the correct invoice number, if you have the same invoice number in more than one company code. To my understanding, the lockbox program first tries to identify the customer based on MICR number and then see all the open invoice in that customer and if it finds a match it will apply or else it will post on account on that customer otherwise it will not process it.
    So, can you please check whether
    1. You have a valid MICR number in the customer master and if the same MICR number is available in the lockbox,  then the lockbox will identify customer and apply based on the invoice details available.
    2. If it is a new MICR number, then Lockbox program, should identify the customer through a SAP document, if there is a user exit, it will see whether that document is OPEN in any of the company codes and identifies the customer based on that.
    If any of these conflicts, then it may not able to process that check.
    Regards,
    Vijay

  • Tds line item not simulating while posting as reference with FBR2

    Dear All
    When I am posting an Invoice using previous document as reference with Tcode FBR2 WTax line Item not simulating, but while I am posting  without reference  i.e. with Tcode FB60 it is simulating, this problem i am facing in production server from this fiscal year but in development server it is working properly.
    what is the possible cause and how to solve this problem.

    Hi,
    For WHT cannot be deducted by using F-02 OR FB01.  It seems system is using the same transaction in background and not FB60 and hence tds is bnot getting deducted.
    Regards
    Milind Sonalkar

Maybe you are looking for

  • ITunes wouldnt start on my Windows 7 64bit, I found the fault!!

    My windows 7 64bit computer would not load the new iTunes 9, all downloaded and installed with no issues but it just would not fire the program up when the icon/or program from file was selected. Sorted it tho!! After hours of fiddling I have found t

  • Home Sharing in iTunes no longer working with Lion....

    Anyone else having this problem?? I have not seen it as a topic. We have 2007 iMacs so chips do not support Air Drop. However, I would not think Air Drop would be required for home sharing in iTunes. Moving to Lion has not been a very good experience

  • Cannot resume external display/monitor after sleep

    Hi, I am using the latest MBPr with yosemite OS. I connect to second display using the thunderbolt to VGA adapter. After returning from sleep stage, the external monitor will not display anything. It just say no signal from my MBPr. I need to disconn

  • LV2011 bug - Error wired to boolen function breaks when saving for previous version

    I just downloaded LabVIEW 2011 this morning. I created this VI and saved it for LV2010 to see how it would deal with it. I opened the VI in LabVIEW 2010SP1 and the error wire is broken. There were no warnings about problems saving this VI as an earli

  • ITunes freezes and becomes unresponsive when I plug in my iPad.

      I have Windows 7, and iTunes works perfectly fine, until I plug in my iPad or any device (I have a iPod touch 4 generation and iPhone 4s). The second I plug in my iPad, iTunes completely freezes and becomes unresponsive. It also becomes unresponsiv