WorkflowLab Beta 2 What you see in it?

The new Beta Version of WorkflowLab is very interesting
Here is the link video of Adobe TV about WorkflowLab:
http://adobe.ly/za4oVO
I'm really excited about this program is a bit similar (no interface) on the goal of software (Office Project). Just is focused towards the development of multimedia.
I guess that as more betas come we will see improvements in workflow (editing options and accurate preferences)
I hope to see the stable version soon

You should get exactly what you see in iPhoto on the printed sheet. Can you describe exactly the workflow you use in printing?
OT
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier versions) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
NOTE: this is not the same as routinely backing up your entire iPhoto library folder to protect your photos. It only protects the loss of your organizational efforts that the database file contains.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. There are versions that are compatible with iPhoto 5, 6, 7 and 8 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. Just put the application in the Dock and click on it whenever you want to backup the dB file. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.
NOTE: The new rebuild option in iPhoto 09 (v. 8.0.2), Rebuild the iPhoto Library Database from automatic backup" makes this tip obsolete.

Similar Messages

How Do You Print What OS X Renders and What You See Like the Lines on a Table on OpenOffice?

Hi. How do you print what you OS X's graphics is rendering (what you see is what you get). I'm trying to print a calling card on OpenOffice Apache, latest but it would not print the guidelines (the lines when you use table, columns and rows) and it would only print the letters.
Thank you in advance.
God bless.

If the lines are printing but they are too faint to see them easily, then there could be a rendering setting that could improve the line density.
But if the lines are not at all visible then maybe the application is set not to print them. So check the Preferences or the printing options for OpenOffice? There might be a setting about the printing of gridlines.
FYI - MS Excel has the gridlines disabled for printing but they can be enabled via the Excel print dialog.

I thought Dreamweaver was what you see is what you get... How do I eliminate the "gap"?

Someone. Please. Help. Me.
In one of my websites www.acsmechanical.net, the images aren't lining up with the background I created. It looks perfect in Dreamweaver itself, but when I upload it or preview it in a browser there is a "gap". I'm thinking it has something to do with the image alignment or positioning. But I really don't know. It's driving me crazy but it may be something simple.
Thanks, Maria

Nope. DW is not what you see is what you get. Never base your design on what you see in the preview window.
Try taking out the empty <p> tags from your code
<body >
<br />
<table width="925" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
    <td height="79" colspan="2"><p><img src="images/logo.gif" width="325" height="80" />
<tr>
    <td height="273" colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center">
        <p> </p>

LR4.2 printing multiple cell with overlap - What you see IS NOT what you get ?

Hi,
I am using LR4.2 and PS-elements. Epson 3800 for printing
PS - never an isue.
user is admin ..
I get a strange phenomena in LR4.2 when doing multiple cells on same print - with overlapping: At time what you see is not what's going to be printed! at times you will get the printout with some of the cells mising photos (even printing them to file will result in the same way..). Post the printing (ouch wasting of paper...) if I select the cell, I can "send it to the front, ad now it will be printed ok/.
Please advice - did you see this before >?
Ami

I have never tried printing overlapping photos. Can you describe how to a simple photo layout that demonstrates the problem so others can try? Or at least include a screen-capture of the layout that is showing the issue. It may have something to do with your particular printer driver even if you print to a JPG, but if others, with other printers have the same issue, then it is likely something within LR, only.

Smartforms - What you see is not what you get ?

I create a delivery note by smartforms.
Print Preview in the PC, the position of data is correct.
But printed on the paper, what you see in the PC is not what you get? The page format is custom, not standard.
Is there somebody know reason?
Thanks!!

I all really depends on the printer, the print drivers, and how the printer is setup on the basis side.
I have seen the same thing when printing one layout from two different printers. They didn't look the same.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

How do I add subtitles like what you see in a movie with black scripts both at the top and below?

How do I add subtitles like what you see in a movie with black scripts both at the top and below?

thank you so much that was it :). im retarded though i need to look this stuff up in the api. sorry just starting out and useally find things in the api like 75% of the time

I want to learn pro techniques like what you see on TV

I want to be able to do the cool effects you see on modern documentaries like on the History channel or TLC with zoom blur transitions, slick retiming effects, complete with "swoosh" sound fx just to name a few techniques. I've tried looking up tutorial sites but I haven't found any that details the pro techniques that I have in mind. Either my skills are sorely lacking or the pros must be using some other tools beyond FCS 1, which is what I'm using. Can anybody point me to good sources?

I think you'll find that a lot of this comes with time and patience as you practice using the software packages and learn how they best intergrate within each other. As you do this you will very quickly see how there is not one standard rule of thumb, but a multitude of methods to achieve a variety of results. As you learn more and more you soon begin to 'discover' various methods to achieve the results you are after.
You could start by going through the tutorials that Apple supplied when you bought FCS.
You could also find places that offer specialised courses in Post-Production. Apple offer a variety of courses from beginners through to 'Train The Trainers'.
But in terms of being 'able to do cool effects you see...like on the History Channel of TLC' - the professionals who did that didn't learn how to do it overnight while searching the net for quick tutorials.

Keypad blocking what you see

When online and on internet somtimes when you have to log in or write text into something that is on bottom or near bottom of page and the text keypad comes up,,, YOU CAN'T SEE what you have been writing..... the keypad should go under the insert text box.....
Nokia,,,,,can this be updated?
thanks,
David Freyr
Iceland

If you had turned off the "Sticky Footer" feature for your page in Page Properties, or in Site Properties, I believe it would have provided the behavior you were looking for.
One gotcha with providing a WYSIWYG Design view is that every visitor will be viewing your site in a browser window of a different height. By default Muse positions your footer so it's no higher than the bottom of the visitor's browser. (The footer is "sticky" and thus sticks to the bottom of the browser window if the content is shorter than the height of the browser window.) If you would prefer your footer to appear in the middle of the browser window when the browser window is taller than your content, you can achieve that by turning off the "Sticky Footer" feature.

Merge to HDR Pro: What you see is not what you get?

I am using PSCC on an iMac (Mavericks). When I bring bracketed shots into PSCC's Merge to HDR Pro, I can work the settings and/or presets to get an image that looks OK. However, when I exit from HDR Pro by clicking OK, the image displayed in PSCC is very different from what I was just looking at in HDR Pro. The screenshots here show just one example, working in 16-bit mode. Other images show even greater differences. Working in 32-bit mode makes it even worse. This did not use to happen in my earlier versions of PS (perpetual license). Am I missing something or doing something wrong?
Image in HDR Pro:
Image in PSCC after clicking OK:

Trevor.Dennis wrote:
Yes I realised that. There are now quite a few applications for processing HDR, and IMO Photomatix has always been the best of them, and certainly did a better job than Photoshop. My point was that the old 'Merge to HDR Pro' workflow is now redundant if you have Photoshop CC, and that using Camera RAW as outlined by Julianne Kost, has suddenly leapfrogged all the competition by an order of magnitude.
So I strongly urge you to take Mr Prengel's advice. Output the image in 32bit, and use ACR to process it. Did you watch the video tutorial I linked to?
You certainly shouldn't get all pixel-peeper about how the 32bit image looks on your screen. It is not possible to show the tonal width of a 32 bit image on a computer screen, so you are seeing a 'representation' of how it might look after processing.
FWIIW I have taught HDR (and Photoshop) to some of the best photographers in the world at two PSNZ National Conventions back in 2010 and 2011, so I kind of have strong opinions about it. Not that I use it excessively, but it is a very handy tool to keep in your photographic skills repertoire.
Trevor,
I am sorry if I misunderstood your post. I am actually using the same workflow as Julianne Kost in her video (which I had watched prior to posting here). And, as I posted above, I do agree with Mr. Prengel that I should just take the 32 bit image into Camera Raw and do the toning there. As a matter of fact, that is what I have been doing in Photoshop CC (sending the pictures from Lightroom, same as Julianne Kosts does), and I can do a very good job, if I say so myself.
So the question I had was merely one of puzzlement at seeing the difference between the image just before exiting HDR Pro and what shows up in Camera Raw. In the examples I provided, and in many other cases, it clearly went beyond pixel-peeping: they were two very different images. But I think I understand now why this is, which you kindly pointed out: it is not possible to show the tonal width of a 32 bit image on a computer monitor. I had not considered that and I thank you for mentioning it.
It may be that in some cases (as in Julianne Kosts's video) the representation in HDR Pro is actually pretty close to the initial view in Camera Raw, but in other cases (my examples) it is not. Not really an issue, I agree.

What You see is not what you get when printing a adobe PDF file

Hi, we use adobe pdf files to send printing of maps to different customers. Quite often a pdf file looks Ok on the screen but printed on paper some lines is crossing the paper which should not be there.
It is easy to reproduce and seems to happen on different computers. Most of them use windows7. If we use another program than adobe for displaying and printing the same file the print is correct.
Is this a bug in print driver or in the Adobe reader which produce the data for the print driver. Most files is created by a thin print solution called UNIPRINT.

The text spacing also frustrates me, but I'm afraid is a drawback of the iWeb system. I always have to go back and re-tweak certain paragraphs that I try to squeeze into a smaller space. I've learned that it's best to allow for a little breathing room with the width and height of the text field. If the text field is exactly the width and height of your paragraph in iWeb, chances are the lines are going to bump down just a hair, creating an extra line of text which will decrease your line spacing if the height is also tight. Does that make sense?
As far as the hyperlinks go, I used to get freaked out because what I thought was the wrong formatting, but what I found out was just the formatting for having visited the linked site.
What iWeb does for those of us who don't know or don't care to mess with html code is an extremely complex process that I can't even begin to understand. And on top of that you add the relative unpredictability of the various browsers and systems that are out there. You have to roll with the punches and figure out these little discrepancies to get the finished product you want.
Good luck!

IWeb 09 - what you see is NOT what you get

I upgraded from iWeb 08 to iWeb 09. In a nutshell: oops.
I altered one page of my website (the text inside of the text boxes and the colored boxes that I had layered beneath the text boxes) and uploaded it. What looked perfectly good in iWeb was completely out of whack once I uploaded it. New text that I had typed in was showing up as double spaced rather than single spaced. The text boxes were longer or wider than they should be - or the colored boxes were longer or shorter, however we want to look at it.
The text in separate text boxes that I had lined up so it appeared as though they were in columns were totally out of whack. To top it all off, once I got it right on my Mac I had to keep running back and forth across the street to check it on a PC because it showed up differently on IE.
Is this a known bug of iWeb 09? I was gobsmacked. . .it's not like some new and slightly buggy functionality was added - we're talking basic WYSIWYG functions. If it's a bug, is there a fix for it?
If there's no fix then I want to go back to iWeb 08 until 09 becomes usable - there's no way I'm going to go through all of this every time I update the site, which is several times per week.
aaauuugggghhh!
Suggestions?
Thanks,
roxpat

Well, this may be a silly suggestion, but have you tried holding "shift" while you refresh the page? I've only had my pages show up wacky just a few times (including unpublished pages sitting on my desktop), and that always works for me.

CR for VS2010 - font when printing (what you see is not what you get)

If anyone can help resolve this issue, I would be very grateful!
We use VS 2010 with the production Crystal Reports for VS 2010. I deployed a web site to production on a Win 2008 r2 server with IIS 7.
When the user runs a report (we have it set to be pdf), the font used by the report displays properly. When printing, it prints with a different font. The correct font is Old English. I believe it is printing in arial.
I installed the font on the server. I gave rights to the fonts directory for the web site. I ran the redistributable. I'm not sure what else to try.

Yes, I do mean client-side.
Also, the crystal report viewer control print mode set to pdf instead of Active X.
We had issues with users being able to install the Active X viewer.
The font has been installed on the client.
When you stated "Print Control is via binary page descriptors, where the font composition is turned to printable images on the client-side" --- Does that mean that certain fonts or even font types may not work?
Thank you for your help.

What you see is not what you get

I have successfully created a blog using iWeb '08 (on an '07 macbook OS 10.4.11) but my blog archive page when viewed with Safari shows a mis-arrayed menu bar arranged letter by letter vertically down the left side of the page. When viewed with Firefox, the blog archive page shows a vertically arrayed menu bar. While working on the page, no menu bar whatsoever is visible on the blog archive page.
1) How do I access the navigation bar on the iWeb working blog archive page to try to correct the problem?
2) How to solve the browser issue: Why does a page look different on different browsers? Is there a setting to use that avoids this problem?

The text spacing also frustrates me, but I'm afraid is a drawback of the iWeb system. I always have to go back and re-tweak certain paragraphs that I try to squeeze into a smaller space. I've learned that it's best to allow for a little breathing room with the width and height of the text field. If the text field is exactly the width and height of your paragraph in iWeb, chances are the lines are going to bump down just a hair, creating an extra line of text which will decrease your line spacing if the height is also tight. Does that make sense?
As far as the hyperlinks go, I used to get freaked out because what I thought was the wrong formatting, but what I found out was just the formatting for having visited the linked site.
What iWeb does for those of us who don't know or don't care to mess with html code is an extremely complex process that I can't even begin to understand. And on top of that you add the relative unpredictability of the various browsers and systems that are out there. You have to roll with the punches and figure out these little discrepancies to get the finished product you want.
Good luck!

In Aperature, how do you keep photos in the order you changed them to while editing? When you go to burn them to a disk, the order changes from what you see on the screen.

I need to know how to save my photos to a disk for a client in the order I changed them while working on them. I photographed a party with another photographer and joined both photographers photos. Now I want to keep them in the order the event took place and how I rearranged them.

The exported photos will show on the disk like any sequence of files, sorted by date, name, filetype, etc. To help your client to sort them according to your sequence, rename the files and append a sequence number. You can rename them on export by using an export preset, for example the name format "Custom name with index". That will append a number to the filename, according to the position in the album you are exporting.

What you see is not what you get (gradient fills in text boxes do not reder

I have a web page that has a lot of text boxes with gradient fills. Some of these render correctly in Safari but many do not. They all look fine in iWeb. I copied one that rendered correctly and the pasted version did not. (the gradient fill did not cover the entire text box) Text boxes with two lines of text seem to have the most problems. Most copied text boxes also have problems.

Using a shape with a gradient fill and dragging a plain text box on top of it instead of just filling a text box with a gradient fill does work. However, Im not sure the problem is converting my text to an image as the html still has my text inside of tags even with the gradient fill. It seems like iweb should produce web pages that look exactly like what is shown in iweb.
So my question is not completely answered, but I do have a work around. Thanks
Russ

WorkflowLab Beta 2 What you see in it?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for