Wrong Base value in MIGO

Dear All
I have created a Import PO for a EOU. All the prices in the PO is correct. But while doing MIGO Base Value in the Excise Tab is different from the PO.
Pls guide me through
Regards
JK

This is the problem with pricing procedure,
check your pricing procedure

Similar Messages

TAXINN - Base Value in Migo for the item is ZERO

Hi,
We are using TAXINN Tax Procedure.
In MIGO Excise Item Tab, Base value is coming zero. Also it is updating in Excise Registers 23A part I & 2.
Can anybody tell me where i am doing a mistake.
Thanks in advance
KK

Hi Bharat,
Thank you very much for your quick response.
It is not intra company STO. This is normal procurement from the outside vendor.
Can you explain me why it is coming Zero
Hope it is clear for you
If you have any query, please do not hesitate to ask me
Thanks in advance
KK

Base value in migo

Dear all,
I'm creatng a import po
Gross Price-1,314,117.00
IMP INSURANCE IN VAL-1,280.00
Landed Price-13,153.97
IN Basic customs-66,427.55
IN CVD-223,196.57
Ecess on In CVD-6,695.90
Customs ECess on TD-8,889.61
IN additional duty-65,350.43
Neg.Landed Price-13,153.97
but my querry is that what value should come at the time of MIGO 3rd header excise item column
base value amount- how much amount .pls explain in detail points should be rewarded.
amin

Hi Bharat,
Thank you very much for your quick response.
It is not intra company STO. This is normal procurement from the outside vendor.
Can you explain me why it is coming Zero
Hope it is clear for you
If you have any query, please do not hesitate to ask me
Thanks in advance
KK

Problem Base Value in MIGO

Dear Consultant,
System not calculating BED amount properly at MIGO Transaction
Problem is described below
We created one Import PO with JCDB (10%) and ZCVD (10%) Condition and at MIGO Transaction system picking base value i.e 6,506.19 but BED is not calculating as per % maintained in PO i.e. 660.28
And if we use CVDN Condition type system not asking for Commercial Invoice No
Please suggest any suitable suggestion in this regards
Regards
Deepak

Hi,
You need to do below configuration for the same.
From M/06, open conditions ,and set accurals.
And in Pricing Procedure -M/08,define accural Key and account key.
This will resolve your issue.
Now GRN is already posted,so reverse the same , delete the line item 10 ,enter new details in new line item and Make GRN.
THis will resolve your Issue.
Regards,
Sandesh Sawant

Exchange rate for base value in Migo

Dear All
For Import Po , while posting GR after comr. invoice system taking all duties currectly, but excise base is calculate with diff exchange rate, It is trading plant and amount is posed RGD regiister,
please help from whr it pick up exchange rate , i maintain exchange rate while invoice, also maintain same in po,
pls help
Vipin

Hi
Thanks for reply
Yes system take rate from ob08, but now i want rate which i assign in comertial invoice and po,
but after chnging in OB08 system not update rate in migo,
pls help

Base value & excise amount during MRP MIGO & MIRO

Excise base amount & excise values are calulated & put during MRP based MIGO & similar process is again done during MIRO.Can't this duplicacy be avoided.
Hitesh Chaturvedi

Hi
You have to calculate excise base value during MIGO as well as MIRO because both these activities are done by different departments.
Some times the value calculated during MIGO is wrong and is corrected by excise dept during part2 posting in J1IEX as well.
So u cant avoid it doing twice

Exice wrong values in migo

Hi,
I'm geting wrong excise values during migo- excise capturing,
Base price - 1000
BED - 16% - 160
Ed cess 2% - 3.20
Se cess 1% - 1.60... this is the normal flow, where mine is flowed like
blw;
Base price - 1000
BED - 16% - 174
Ed cess 2% - 3.20
Se cess 1% - 1.60
pls tell me how to correct it..

condition record is the one possibility for this.
check the excise defaults in CIN setting i think there u have maitained the rs.14 as values colounm instead of 14% BED condition
Again check same in J1ID
the excise rates for chapter iD
regards,.
sujit

Base Value not changing in MIGO Excise Tab

Dear Gururs,
We are using MIGO to capture & Post Excise Invoice for our Import PO (PO type ZIMP). the problem is, when we change the qty in MIGO Qty tab, corresponding base value is not getting update in Excise tab. Please suggest a solution.

Hi,
If you are doing a MIGO for Import consignment, duties are flow from Invoice booked thru MIRO, so doutful if you can change corresponding base value in MIGO.
Regards,
Vikas

Reg: Base value in Excise tab in MIGO for imports po

Hi All.
I have a doubt how is the base value claculated in excise tab while doing MIGO for imports PO does this value is picked up from the materila master ?!!!1
regards,
Abilash V

hi
for import MIGO u r entering the doc no of excise (miro doc )
using this system calculates the base value in MIGO
when u do MIGO for imports at start only system will ask u for doc no of MIRO
regards
KI

Wrong depreciation calculated for base value 04 + EA-FIN activated

Hi,
after activating EA-FIN, depreciation for assets using base value 04 (= half of replacement value) is calculated wrong.
While AW01 for a particular asset shows depreciation values based on the FULL replacement value (like it would be base value 03) AW01_AFAR (the u201Coldu201D asset explorer) shows the correct depreciation for base value 04.
The wrong base value can also be seen using the "display depreciation calculation" button in both transactions.
There are no enhancements for base value determination active.
I didnu2019t find any SAPNET notes nor SCN entries regarding this case, any ideas?
Best regards, Christian

For what it's worth, I did a search and didn't find anything either.
It sounds like you've already tried this, but if the base value (the actual $$ value) is different in the trace on both tcodes then you have a problem. I would be sure to recalculate the values when you enter AW01 and AW01_AFAR to ensure that it's correct before looking at the trace.
The formula for the replacement value is:
( u_ganlc-kansw + u_ganlc-answl +
               u_ganlc-kmafa + u_ganlc-mafav + u_ganlc-zusma +
               u_ganlc-mafam + u_ganlc-mafal +
               u_ganlc-kaufw + u_ganlc-aufwv +
               u_ganlc-aufwp + u_ganlc-aufwl ) / 2 .
I'd look at ANLC for the asset and do the calculation yourself to confirm the value.
You've probably done all of that so I predict an OSS message in your future !
-nathan

Excise Base value wrong in MIGO

Hello ,
PB00 and some Z condition types are used in Pricing Procedure....And Excise is calculted
on the addition of PBoo+Z condition types, The BED and ECS and SECess is calculted correctly
While capturing the excise invoice in MIGO
We are using Ecc 6.0
While MIGo iam planng to capture the excise Invoice, while in Excise Invoice Tab, iam selecting
the "only Capture Excise Invoice"(In header)
In Item level Excise tab... we may see the BED.ECS,SECess and excise base value
We are getting the BED and ECS and SECESS is calculting the values correctly BUT
The Excise Base Value showing in the Base value field is wrong... why?
It is only showing the PB00 value here means PB0O value * Qty....... Here it is not giving the
addttion of Z condition types
But the BED and remaining values are calculated on PB00 and Z condition type. But why system
is taking only PB00 value in Base value tab in MIGO.
Regards
sapman man

Hello.
In this Z conditions are Stastical .... and We are not asigning any Account keys to them.....
In This case..... while Procurning the material for manufacturing plant..We are get the BED and ECS and SECEss are calculated on ZMRP-ZABT charges....
He re in our case the BED and ECS and SECess are correct. means it is calculated on ZMRP-ZABT charge...... But In MIGO the Base value shown is worng.... i,e is only showing us the PB00 value(means PB00 X Qty)
How to get the correct excise base value
Regards
Sapman man

Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO while Depot

we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman man

Please check ur setting of maintainexsice defaults.
BED condition type should be properly maintained.
regards,
Sujit

Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO and J1IG

Hi,
we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman man

Dear,
Use Z condition before PB00. The same should be statastical as PB00.
Check the excise default settings as well as,
Check the classify condition types
regards,
sujit

In MIGO wrong excise base value in import po

Hi,
We have done import PO applied the excise tax code EI, then we try to create MIGO except miro, but in MIGO in we changed the qty for example in PO 100qty and price 100 so total amount is 10000 so we get excise base value is 1000, but now we change the qty in mIGO as 10qty we get same excise base value as 1000 its not calculted.
please suggest me the any config
Thanks
Shital

Hi,
i have test in SAP note u suggested
Excise base defaulted incorrectly at the time of excise invoice capture in the imports scenario with ADC (additional duty of customs) being applicable. The excise duty values are picked from the commercial invoice captured but the excise base value is being calculated incorrectly.
but my scenario is different
Thanks
Shital

MIGO Base Value.

Dear Expert
Please help me on below scenario.
My client is raising PO. The Material cost is 100 INR. While goods receipting, Knowing that material cost is 120 INR.
So i am changing the Base value 100 to 120 INR in detail data (Excise item) tab while doing in MIGO.
After posting the MIGO (Accounting entries) showing as per PO Value. It is not showing as per MIGO Base Value.
Please help me. How i resolve this issue?

gawas11 wrote:
Hi,
>
> How i change the PO price after release of 5 Level?
>
> Thanks & regards
> Nitesh
I think this 5 level release is not delivered by SAP, it is homemade customizing.
In general the release was made on wrong values, isn't it?
And it was not probably not considered that a price need to be changed after PO creation.
From my point of view you may rethink about this release strategy customizing and how you want live the process in such a case. This either results in changing of release strategy to reflect such cases in future or in an organisational procedure that outlines what you have to do in such a case.

Wrong Base value in MIGO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for